Content uploaded by Aristotelis Komianos
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Aristotelis Komianos on Oct 28, 2019
Content may be subject to copyright.
Available via license: CC BY-NC
Content may be subject to copyright.
335
1 INTRODUCTION
Inrecentyears,aremarkabledevelopmenthas
attractedtheattentionoftheshippingandmaritime
sector,namelythe“Unmanned”and/or
“Autonomous”(AtS)shipprojects.Combinedand
reinforcedbyInformationandCommunications
Technology(ICT)inventions,theseprojectshave
broughtrevolutionarychangestotraditionalshipping
practicesandrevealanewdimension,leading
owners,operators,andmanufacturerstoan
innovativerethinkingofshipping.(LloydsRegister,
2016).
Theseconceptshavegainedgroundamongstthe
shippingindustry’sresearchprojectsand,asanew
trend,havegeneratedseveralongoingprototypeand
explorationendeavours.However,thereareseveral
issuestobeaddressedbeforetheyarefullyfunctional
anduniversallyacceptedassafe,secure,andviable
meansoftransportation.Anincreasinglypositive
attitudeintheshippingindustrytowardstheissuesof
autonomy,automation,unmannedoperations,Big
Data,enterprise‐gradeconnectivity,andanalyticsis
steadilyexpandingtheshippingandmaritime
agenda.
UsingthelatestICTsystems,shipsarebuiltwith
enhancedcontrolcapabilities,communication,and
interfaces,andtheywillsoonberunbyremoteland‐
basedoroffshoreservices,wheneverandwherever
theyarerequired.Thesesystemshavethepotentialto
enhancethesafety,reliability,andperformanceof
shippingcompanies,butalsoposechallengesand
risksthatmustbeidentified,understood,and
addressedsothatnewinnovativetechnologies
integratewiththedesignandoperationoftheshipsto
ensuresafety.
BecausetheAutonomousandUnmannedships
consistofseveralinterconnectedsystems,anddueto
therapidevolutionoftechnology,itcannotbe
assumedthatsuchvesselswillbesafe,based
exclusivelyonknowledgegainedfromearlier
systems.Therefore,aholisticsystemapproachis
needed(totalsystems)‐asystemthatconsidersallthe
differentsystems(asystemofsystems)onboardand
ashore,howtheyaredesignedandinstalled,how
The Autonomous Shipping Era. Operational,
Regulatory, and Quality Challenges
A. Komianos
TheNauticalInstitute,London,UnitedKingdom
ABSTRACT:ThearticleprovidesadescriptionoftheAutonomousship,studiesexistingrelevantprojects,and
examinestherelatedOperational,Regulatory,andQualityassurancechallengesraisedduetothedevelopment
andactualdeploymentofsuchvesselsinthenearfuture.Afterreviewingthemainoperationalprocedures,
existingregulations,andqualityassurancestandards,anumberofpossiblesolutionsandapproachesto
overcometheidentifiedchallengesareindicated.Someoftheconclusionsmaybeusednotonlyinthe
Autonomousshipsbutalsointraditionallymannedvessels.
http://www.transnav.eu
the International Journal
on Marine Navigation
and Safety of Sea Transportation
Volume 12
Number 2
June 2018
DOI:10.12716/1001.12.02.15
336
theyrelate,andhowtheywillbemanagedand
regulated.
Comparabletoadrone,theunmannedvesselis
alreadyinuseformilitary,aerospace,orscientific
purposes.Submersibleunmannedvehicles,suchas
theautonomousunderwatervehicles(AUV)orthe
remotelyoperatedvehicles(ROV)whichareusedfor
deep‐seaexplorationoftheseabedorofwrecks,in
additiontocruisemissiles,surfacetoairmissiles,air
toairmissiles,airtosurfacemissiles,andintelligent
torpedoesareallexamplesofatechnologywhichis
alreadyinuseandcontinuestodevelop.
The“Autonomousvessels”willbeequippedwith
systemsallowingself‐steeringbysensor‐based
detectionofobjectssuchasobstaclesandwillbeable
toself‐initiateanactione.g.toavoidcollisionswith
otherobjects.Thismaybeachievedbytechnical
systemsinstalledon‐board,whichuseprogrammed
algorithmsandinputdatagatheredbysensors.The
introductionoftheAutonomousshipconcepttothe
shippingindustrymightstartaneweraandbecomea
gamechangerintermsofcostefficiency,accident
prevention,andhumanresources.AccordingtoRolls‐
Royce(aleadingcompanyinAutonomousship
research)andothersupportersoftheproject,themain
advantageofsuchshipsisthattheymightreduce
maritimeaccidentscausedbyfatigueandalcohol
abuse(Rolls‐Royce,2015).
Animportantissuefortheshippingindustry,
accidentsaremostoftenrelatedtohumanfactors,
suchasfatigue,duetoanincreasingworkloadanda
decreaseinthecrewsizepership,andalcoholor
drugabuse.Althoughtheshortageofseafarersis
becomingaglobalissue,apotential(andhopefully
controlled)decreaseinthenumberofseafarers
neededonboardcouldeaseandresolvethisproblem.
Paradigmsofappliedunmannedsystemscan
alreadybefoundinothermodesoftransport,suchas
airplanes,trains,andintheautomobileindustry,
whichisalreadytryingtodevelopautonomous
vehicles.However,averydistinctandserious
problemexistsintheshippingandmaritimesectors,
namely,thelackofAutonomousships’coverageand
inclusioninrelevantsafety,security,and
environmentalprotectionconventionsand
regulations.Theinitiationofanewperspectiveis
thereforeneededbeforeAutonomousshipscanbe
introducedtocommercialshipping,inordertoensure
thepreventionofmaritimeaccidentsandthe
protectionoftheenvironment.
2 BACKGROUND
Thenumberofautonomousvehiclesbeingusedinthe
air,ontheground,andintheseaisincreasing.As
Mindel(2015)states,humansrepeatedlyfind
manned,“remoteandautonomousvehiclesevolving
together,eachaffectingtheother”.
Therearealreadyseveralsmall‐sizeunmanned
andautonomouscraftsinthemaritimesectorwhich
havebeenengagedinsurfacenavigation,research
andscientificactivities,underwateroperations,and
specificmilitaryactivities.Provensafe,thesevessels
arethepathtowardstheeliminationofhumanerror
andthusaccidentminimization[32].
TheEuropeanTechnologyPlatformdescribesthe
autonomousshipasanextgenerationmodular
controlandcommunicationstechnologysystemof
systemswhichwill“enablewirelessmonitoringand
controlfunctionsbothonandoffboard.Thesewill
includeadvanceddecisionsupportsystemsto
provideacapabilitytooperateshipsremotelyunder
semiorfullyautonomouscontrol”[31].
Therearetwogenericalternativesthatare
combinedinanautonomousship,namely“the
remoteshipwherethetasksofoperatingtheshipare
performedviaaremote‐controlmechanisme.g.bya
shorebasedhumanoperator”,and“theautomated
shipwhereadvanceddecisionsupportsystemson
boardundertakealltheoperationaldecisions
independentlywithoutinterventionofahuman
operator”.
TheMaritimeUnmannedNavigationthrough
IntelligenceinNetworks(MUNIN)startedin2012
andendedin2015.ItwasfundedbytheEuropean
Commission(EC),withthepurposeofinvestigating
thetechnical,economic,andlegalfeasibilityof
unmannedships[31].Themostimportant
characteristicsofthisprojectincludetheabilityofthe
shiptobeoperatedbyanautonomousshipping
systemonboard(whilehavingtheabilitytobe
supervisedandcontrolledbylandoperators),its
abilitytominimizetheriskofcollisionandcomply
withtheConventionontheInternationalRegulations
forPreventingCollisionsatSea(COLREG),andthe
factthatitssafetyandoperationsensorscanbeused
tosearchforobjects.
ThislastcharacteristicdoesnotsatisfyRule5of
COLREG,whichrequiresproperlook‐outbyeyeand
earoneveryshiptoassessthesituationandtherisk
ofcollision.
Figure1.TheMUNINproject.www.unmanned‐ship.org
(AccessedOctober2017)
Anotherexampleofsuchaprojectisthatofthe
AdvancedAutonomousWaterborneApplications
Initiative(AAWA).LaunchedbyRolls‐Roycein2015,
itspurposeistobringtogetheruniversities,ship
designers,equipmentmanufacturers,and
classificationsocietiestoexploretheeconomic,social,
legal,regulatory,andtechnologicalfactorswhich
needtobeaddressedinordertomakeautonomous
shipsareality.Itwillproducethespecificationand
preliminarydesignsforthenextgenerationof
337
advancedshipsolutions.“Autonomousshippingisthe
futureofthemaritimeindustry”arguesMikael
Makinen,presidentofRolls‐Royceʹsmarinedivision,
inawhitepaperpublishedbythecompany.“As
disruptiveasthesmartphone,thesmartshipwill
revolutionisethelandscapeofshipdesignandoperations”
[35].
Figure2.TheAdvancedAutonomousWaterborne
ApplicationsInitiative.ImagefromtheRolls‐Royce
www.rolls‐royce.com(AccessedOctober2017)
AthirdprojectistheReVolt,anunmanned,60‐
metre‐long,zero‐emission,shortseavessel,
developedbyDNVGL.Thevesseliscrewless,fully
batterypowered,autonomous,and,accordingtothe
company’swebpage1,itoffers“asolutiontothe
growingneedfortransportcapacity”.Theprojectwas
startedinordertomanagethetrafficcongestionin
urbanareasontheEU’sroadnetwork.Thisbecame
anissuebecausepopulationgrowthhascreateda
demandfortransportationthatexceedsthecapacity
ofexistingroads.
Toeasetheseproblems,administrationsallover
theEUare“tryingtomovesomeofthefreightvolume
fromroadstowaterways.However,profitmarginsinthe
short‐seashippingsegmentaresmall”.
Figure3.ReVoltdockarrivalImagefrom
https://www.dnvgl.com(AccessedSeptember2017)
Theresultofamulti‐disciplinary,team‐based
developmentproject,ReVoltisbasedonan
assessmentofcurrentrequirementsalongshort‐sea
routes.Theshipwilloperateataspeedof6knots
witharangeof100nauticalmilesandacargo
capacityof100twenty‐footcontainers.Beingcrew‐
less,therewillbenoneedforaccommodationwhich
usuallyformsthevessel’ssuperstructure.Compared
toadiesel‐runship,thevesselcouldsaveuptoUSD
1https://www.dnvgl.com/technology-
innovation/revolt/index.html
34millionduringitsestimated30‐yearlifetime,
savingmorethanamillionUSDannually,duetothe
resultingincreaseinloadingcapacityandthelow
operatingandmaintenancecosts.ThevisionofDNV‐
GListheextensionoftheprojecttoinvolveland‐
basedchargingfacilitiesandcapacitiesaswell.
TheendeavourdevelopedbyLloyd’sRegister(LR)
isnamedtheCyber‐enabledshipproject,which
discussestheproceduresandguidancefor
autonomousshipoperations.UnderLRguidancefor
Cyber‐enabledships“Deployinginformationand
communicationstechnologyinshipping–Lloyd’s
Register’sapproachtoassurance”,thecyber‐enabled
shipisperceivedasa“systemofsystems”[28].
Figure5.Lloyd’sRegisteredLevelsofAutonomy
www.lr.org/cyberAccessedOct2017
As such, six main risks have been identified,
namely the System, the Human-system, the
Software, the Network and communications, the
Data assurance, and last but not least the Cyber
security. For each of these risks, the guideline
describes the aspects which should be studied in
addition to a short description of cyber-enabled
systems. Furthermore, “Cyber-enabled ships:
Ship Right procedure – autonomous ships” was
developed, naming seven levels of autonomy
ranging from a Manual-no autonomous function
to a fully autonomous operational mode.
This approach identifies the proper actions
needed, based on the desired level of autonomy.
More specifically, during the Manual – no
autonomous (AL 0) function, all actions and
decisions (such as navigation, surveillance, etc.)
are performed manually by humans on board,
although some systems may have a level of
autonomy, with ‘human in/on the loop’ such as
the Periodical Maintenance System (PMS) and
the engine control.
RegardingOn‐shipdecisionsupport(AL1), the crew
onboarddecidesandactswiththeoptionalaidof
decision support tools on the shipsuchastheDynamic
Positioning (DP) capability. The Onandoff‐shipdecision
support(AL2) is similar to (AL 1) with theadditionofa
data provision option,providedbysystemsonboardor
fromashorefacility,e.g.routingplanning(onboard)
andweatherrouting(shorebasedguidance).
Withregardsto‘Active’humanintheloop(AL3), all
decisionsandactionsonboardareperformed
autonomouslyunderhumansupervision.Datamay
338
beprovidedasin(AL 2),butdecisionswhichmay
seriouslyimpactthesafetyandsecurityofthevessel
requirehumanintervention.
Similarly,asregardstheHumanontheloop–
operator/supervisory(AL4),humansupervisionmay
intercedeandover‐rideautonomouslyperformed
decisionsandactionswhichmayhaveaserious
impact.AFullyautonomous(AL5)system,which
allowssomeaccessduringamission,isan
unsupervisedorrarelysupervisedoperationduring
whichdecisionsandactionsaremadebythesystem.
Finally,aFullyautonomous(AL6)system, which
allowsnoaccessduringmissionfunction,isatotally
unsupervisedoperationduringwhichdecisionsare
madeandactionedbythesystem.
AnotherrelevantprojectistheAutonomousMarine
OperationsandSystems(AMOS)Project3,whichwas
developedbytheDepartmentsofMarineTechnology
andEngineeringCyberneticsattheNorwegian
UniversityofScienceandTechnology(NTNU)in
collaborationwithinternationalandnational
partners. Itisrelatedtotheunmannedshipsand
focusesonthefollowingtopics:Autonomoussystem
andpayloadarchitectures,Coordinatedoperationofa
sensornetworkofunmannedvehiclesandfloating
nodes,Integratedunderwaternavigationand
mapping,Autonomousobjectdetectionandtracking
inmarineenvironmentsusinginfraredsensors,
Sensor‐basedguidanceandpathoptimization,
Coordinatedandcooperativecontrolarchitecturesfor
intelligenttaskexecution,andcollisionavoidancein
uncertainmaritimeenvironments[32].
Figure6.NTNUresearchareas.Imagefrom
www.ntnu.edu/amos(AccessedSep2017)
Oneofthelatestprojectsrelatedtothe
AutonomousShipistheʺYARABirkelandʺ (YB).
YARAandKONGSBERGhaveenteredinto
partnershiptobuildtheworld’sfirstfullyelectric
containerfeedervessel.Theprojectstartedin2017as
amannedvessel,isworkingtowardsremote
operationby2019,andisscheduledtogofully
autonomousby2020.Byremovingupto40,000truck
journeysinpopulatedurbanareas,itwillreduceNOx
andCO2emissions,improveroadsafety,alleviate
trafficcongestion,andwillthuscontributetothe
achievementofUNsustainabilitygoals2.
2 https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/?menu=1300
Figure7.TheʺYARABirkelandʺ/www.km.kongsberg.com
(AccessedOctober2017)
This120TEU(Twenty‐footEquivalentUnits)open
topcontainervesselwillbebattery‐powered(fully
electrical)andispreparedforremotecontroland
autonomousoperation.Duringthefirststageofthe
project,abridgewithcrewfacilitieswillbeusedina
containerisedform.
Thiscompartmentwillbeliftedoffduringthe
autonomousoperationphase.Electriccranesand
relevantequipmentwillbeusedforautomaticload
andunloadcargooperations.Insteadofballasttanks,
theshipisdesignedtouseherbatterypacksas
permanentballast.Additionally,shewillbeabletobe
berthedautomaticallyorgounderwaywithoutany
humaninterventionbyusinganautomaticmooring
system,whichwillnotrequireanyspecialdock
structureorextraportfacilities.
Thevesselwillbeprogrammedtosailwithin12
nauticalmilesoftheNorwegiancoast,betweenthree
portsofthecountry’ssouthernareawhichissafely
coveredbyTheNorwegianCoastalAdministrationsʹ
VTSsystematBrevik.Threecontrolcentreswith
diverseoperationalprofileswillhandleall
operationalissuesinadditiontoanyemergency
situations,orothersafetyandsecurityaspects.
Inadditiontotheabove‐mentionedprojects,a
numberofresearchpapersareveryinformative.“The
productionofunmannedvesselsanditslegalimplications
inthemaritimeindustry”UniversityofOslo(UiO
FacultyofLaw),arguesthatanylegalproblemsposed
byunmannedvesselsareofanorganizationalrather
thanatechnicalnature[38].
Thiskindofshipdesignissonew,duetotherapid
scientificdevelopmentsinthemaritimeindustry,that
suchvesselsarenotyetcoveredbyanyinternational
ruleorregulation.TheInternationalMaritime
Organization(IMO)hasnotgivenanyapprovalfor
thistypeofvesselnorhasitreceivedanyproposal
fromthecontractinggovernmentstoregulate
unmannedvessels.
Giventhelackofproperregulatoryframeworkfor
unmannedvessels,theresearchfocusedon“howthe
unmannedvesselscomplywiththeframeworksetby
presentinternationalmaritimeConventionssuchas
SOLASandISMCode6”.Thepaperconcludedthat
althoughtheexistingmaritimetechnologymaycover
anysafety,environmental,andcommercialconcerns,
thelackofaproperregulatoryframeworkmaydelay
theactualuseofsuchvessels.
Thisregulatoryvacuumgeneratesvariousissues
suchastheinabilityoftheclassificationsocietiesto
339
certifythevessels.Lackingtheclassification
certificates,thevesselscannotbeinsured,thusthey
cannotsail,andeventuallytheywillnotbechartered.
Althoughsomeregulatoryaspectsofmannedvessels
arealsoapplicabletounmannedvessels,suchas
specificclausesoftheISMCode,thereareseveral
internationalregulationsthatneedtobeamended.
“Apre‐analysisonautonomousships”(2016)byM.
Blanke,M.Henriques,J.Bang,theTechnical
UniversityofDenmark(DTU),istheresponseofthe
TechnicalUniversityofDenmark(DTU)toarequest
fromtheDanishMaritimeAuthority.Theconcept
includedresearchintothe“connectionandplanningof
taskstobeincludedincomingeffortstoshedlightonthe
importanceofunmannedshipstoBlueDenmark”.The
paperbrieflydescribesvariouslevelsofoperation,
rangingfromthecompletelymanual(lowest),to
higherlevelsofdecision‐support,whereautomation
fulfilsmoretasks,uptotheleveloftotalautonomy.
Thestudy,besidesotherscientificinputs,wasbased
onself‐propelledcars,unmannedaircraftexperience,
andknowledgefromongoingsimilarautonomous
shipprojects.
“Existingconventionsandunmannedships–need
forchanges?”(2016),byTomotsuguNoma,theWorld
MaritimeUniversity(WMU),researchesthenecessity
forchangesinexistingconventionswhenthe
unmannedshipsareintroducedintothemaritime
transportationsystemand,amongothersubjects,his
researchfocusesonsurveyschemes,especiallywith
respecttoregulationsofSOLASChapterV.Having
studiedexistingsurveyschemesandhaving
identifiedthechallengesrelatedtosurveysand
technical,operational,administrative,andregulatory
problems,thepaperprovidesdefinitionsof
unmannedships,listingthemaincharacteristics[32].
Theimplementationofanautonomousvesselwill
providetheopportunitytoincreasetheefficiencyof
shipoperationaswellasenhancethe‘sustainability’,
whichisthegreatestdriverinanyindustry[37].
AsBenCucksonofLloyd’sRegisterargues,
minimalsafetyrisk,minimalenvironmentalimpact,
andmaximumcommercialbenefitsarethemost
importantdimensionsofasustainabledevelopment
intheshippingworld.Thesefactorsareillustratedin
Figure8.
Figure8.Marineindustry’ssustainabledevelopmentfactors
(Source:Cuckson,2015)
ReportsfromDrewryShippingConsultants
predictthateconomiesofscale(whichgavebirthto
theMega‐ships’constructionanduse)willsoonbein
decline.AMcKinseyanalysiscalculatedthat“slow
steaminghadaddedaround3daystotransits,costing
shippingcustomers$5.7billioninadditionalannual
inventoryandobsolescencecostsworldwide”
(AutonomousShipWhitepaper,2016).The
constructionofintelligentvesselswouldchangethis
situation,creatingabetter,moreprofitable,and,
hopefully,safershippingmarket.InanearlierUnited
StatesCoastGuard(USCG)report,themarine
causalitiescaused(tosomeextent)byhumanerror
wasbetween75‐96%[36].
Burmeisteretal.claimedthatthedevelopmentof
autonomousvesselssuchasthoseintheMUNIN
Projectwillofferawide‐rangingsolutiontomeetthe
mainchallengesofthemaritimetransportindustry,
resultinginadecreaseintheoperationalexpenses,
betterenvironmentalprotectionpractices,andhuman
fatigueminimization[4].However,thereareseveral
challengestobeovercomebeforesuchvesselsare
commerciallyacceptedintheinternational
frameworksobservingtheIMO’s(International
MaritimeOrganisation)rulesandregulationsonthe
seas.
Althoughhighlyadvancedtechnologieswhich
enablethedesignandconstructionofautonomous
vesselsalreadyexistinthemarket,thesesystems
createanumberofchallengesespeciallyinthesocial,
economic,andregulatoryareas.Ontheotherhand,
theupcomingintroductionofautonomousshipsin
themarketreinforcestheexpectationsofapotential
decreaseinaccidentscausedbyhumanerroranda
likelycostreduction,andintensifiestheanticipation
ofbetterservicesinshippingoperations.
StudiesconductedbyBryant[3],Mccallumet
al.[30],andRothblum[36]amongstothers,discovered
thattheproportionofmaritimeaccidentscausedby
humanerrorwasashighas64%to96%.These
errorsweretheresultoffatigue,poormaintenance
andstandards,inadequateknowledgeand
information,andpoorcommunicationskills[36]).
Regardingtheexpectedcostreduction,themain
shipoperationexpensesconsistmostlyoffuelcost
andcrewcompensation.Accordingtothe2011
Drewryreport,crewcostswere“onaveragebetween
31and36%ofthetotalshipoperationcosts”forbulk
carriers.
Apartfromthepreviouslymentionedchallenges
whichmayarisefromtheintroductionofthe
autonomousshipstothemaritimeindustry,Zakirul
arguesthatnewdesignsandtechnologicalfeatures,
whileaffectingthenewbuildingcosts,theavailability
androbustnessofsystems,cybersecurity,and
harmonisedstandardsdevelopments,“arenot
primarilycausedbytechnicalobstaclesandtheyare
arguablytheintegrationoftheautonomousshipinto
theexistingmaritimeoperation”[40].
Regardingthehumanelementintheautomatic
systems,Endsley&Jonesconsiderthe“human‐out‐
of‐the‐loopsyndrome”tobeanimportantissue
becauseanAutonomousshipmayberegardedas
riskiercomparedtoatraditionallymannedvessel,
andthe“socialacceptability”factormustbevery
340
seriouslyconsideredespeciallyinpassengerships.In
addition,amassiveshiftinthefuturefrommannedto
semi‐autonomousorunmannedshipsmayproduce
unwantedresults,suchashighunemploymentinthe
seafaringprofessionandsocialdiscomforttosea
nations[11].
Asforthecomplianceoftheautonomousships
withexistingregulationsatseasuchasSOLAS(Safety
ofLifeatSea)andCOLREGS(CollisionRegulations),
thereisaneedtoupdateoradjustexisting
internationalconventionstoembracethe
developmentofsuchsystems.Updatedtechnicaland
operationalstandardswillbeneededtocoverthe
developmentoftheautonomoussystemsincluding
thecommercialagreementse.g.chartering,
management,andinsurance[34].Moreover,the
memberstatesofIMOmustagreeonthe
implementationoftheautonomousvesselsandthe
liabilityforanyaccidentsinwhichtheseshipsmaybe
involved.
Thecostimpactfortheoperationofthe
autonomousshipsseemstobeconcentratedmostlyin
newbuildingexpensesduetothenoveldesignsand
innovativetechnologicalfeatures,withoutexcluding
newinfrastructurerequirementsfortheshiptoshore
commandi.e.thecontrol,communication,
information,andoperationcentre(e.g.anadvanced
VTScentre).Althoughcostsrelatedtothecrewon
boardtheshipwillbereduced,additionalcostsfor
land‐basedservicessuchasthecontrolcentre,
equipment,maintenancecrewsinportexpenses,and
shorepersonnelwageswillbeincreased[4].
Allautonomousvehiclesshouldoperatesafely
andeffectivelyinareal‐worldenvironmentwhile
doingoperationsofdirectcommercialvalueand
shouldbemanufactured,maintained,deployed,
operated,andretrievedatanacceptablecost[34].
Furthermore,Koopman&Wagnerarguethatthe
challengesofdevelopingsafeautonomousvehicles
aresignificant[27].Indeed,ensuringthatvehiclesare
saferequireseitherfollowingtheISO26262V
process,ordemonstratingthatasetofequally
rigorousprocessandtechnologypracticeshasbeen
applied.InOctober2017,RollsRoycemarine
announcedthatitwilluseGoogle’sCloudMachine
LearningEngine“acrossarangeofapplications,designed
tobothmaketoday’sshipssaferandmoreefficient,andto
launchtheshipsoftomorrow”.Theprojectisenvisaged
toproduceafullyautonomousshipthatwillsetsail
by2020[12].
Justtwoyearsbeforethisannouncement,D.
Mindelinhisbook“Ourrobotsourselves,robotics,and
themythsofautonomy”(2015)hearguesthat,“wehave
themythoffullautonomy,theutopianideathatrobots,
todayorinthefuture,canoperateentirelyontheirown.
Yes,automationcancertainlytakeonpartsoftasks
previouslyaccomplishedbyhumans,andmachinesdoact
ontheirowninresponsetotheirenvironmentsforcertain
periodsoftime.Butthemachinethatoperatesentirely
independentlyofhumandirectionisauselessmachine.
Onlyarockistrulyautonomous,andevenarockwas
formedandplacedbyitsenvironment”.
3 ANALYSIS
ThemainOperationalfeaturesofaseaadventure
maybesummarisedasfollows:Seaworthiness,
desirablePropulsionandElectricPower,pre‐planned
Endurance,safeNavigation,properMaintenance,
reliableCommunications,CollisionandGrounding
avoidance,continuousRiskAssessment,danger
Mitigation,timelyResponsetoANYsafetyorsecurity
issues,Environmentalprotection,safeandon‐time
DeliveryoftheCargo,andLiability/Insurance
coverage.
RegardingthemostimportantRegulationsthat
applytotheshippingindustry,nouniformseasafety,
securityorenvironmentalprotectionrulesfor
internationalshippinghadinitiallyexistedsincethe
creationoftheIMO(InternationalMaritime
Organization)in1948undertheauspicesofthe
UnitedNations(ChurchillR.andLoweA.,1992).This
oversightwascorrectedbycreatingaframeworkof
regulationsfortheshippingindustrythatis“fairand
effective,universallyadoptedanduniversally
implemented”3.Abriefoutlineofthemostimportant
signedconventionsfollows:4
TheSafetyofLifeAtSeaconvention(SOLAS).
TheInternationalManagementCodefortheSafe
OperationsofShipsandforPollutionPrevention
(ISMcode).
TheInternationalConventionofStandardsof
Training,CertificationandWatchkeepingfor
Seafarers(STCW).
ConventionontheInternationalRegulationsfor
PreventingCollisionsatSea(COLREG)
TheInternationalConventionforthePreventionof
PollutionfromShips(MARPOL).
TheInternationalConventiononMaritimeSearch
andRescue(SAR).
TheInternationalConventiononLoadLines(CLL
68/88)whichdefinestheminimumfreeboard,
watertightintegrity,andsurvivabilityofships.
Otherimportantregulatoryandtechnology
innovationfactorsthatstrengthenthesafetycultureof
internationalshippinginclude:
TheInternationalConventionoftheMaritime
SatelliteOrganization(INMARSAT).
TheInternationalConventionforSafeContainers.
TheDoubleHull/DoubleBottom(DH/DB)
regulation,whichplaysanimportantroleinoil
spillpreventionandtheInertGasSystem(IGS)
whichoperatesinsuchawaythatitrendersthe
atmosphereofthecargotanksnon‐flammableand
maintainsincombustibility.
Theminimizationofhumanfactorerrors5(dueto
poorjudgment,stress,inadequatestaffing,poor
livingconditions,fatigue,etc.)byimprovingtraining,
safety,thecultureofenvironmentalawareness,and
communicationbetweenmulticulturaland
multilingualcrewsandPortStateControl(PSC),an
internationallyagreedregimewhichhasbeenan
3www.imo.org (Accessed 20 September 2017)
4With no policing powers the IMO can only argue the
implementation of these conventions and rely on the
efficacy of flag and port state control.
5The U.S Coast Guard defines human error as acts
or omissions or personnel which affect successful
performance.
341
importantsafetyandsecuritycompliancetoolsince
1982,6havealsocontributedtosafetyandsecurityin
themaritimeindustry.
ThemainQualityassuranceissuesidentified
throughtheresearchare,inshort,thevessel’s
construction,design,equipment,information
technology,dataprocessing,software,algorithms,
communications,trainingofshorebasedpersonnel,
safetyandsecurityprocedures.
3.1 SOLAS
TheConventiononSafetyoflifeatsea(SOLAS)
specifiestheminimumacceptablestandardsfor
construction,equipment,operations,andrequired
certificationsofships.Theresponsibilityof
complianceisgiventotheflagstates,inadditionto
theinspectionrightofforeignvesselsvisitingtheir
ports.(Adopted:1974‐Intoforce:1980).Following
theTitanicimmersion,itwasinitiallyenteredinto
forcein1914andproperlyamendedtoitslatest
version.ContractingGovernments(FlagStates),must
ensurethatallshipsundertheirflagsatisfythe
requirementsofSOLAS.Whentherequirementsare
met,acertificateofcomplianceisissued[20].
Intheeventthatashiporitsequipmentbreach(or
thereisasuspicionofviolationof)these
requirements,aPortStateControl(PSC)authorityis
allowedtoinspecttheshipwhenenteringtheareaof
PSC’sresponsibility.Oneofthemostimportantissues
whichmaychallengetheveryessenceofthe
AutonomousshipisChapterVRegulation14of
SOLAS,regardingthemanningofships.Theother
oneisRegulation33(DistressSituations:Obligations
andProcedures)ofthesamechapter,whichwillbe
analysedunderparagraph3.5SearchAndRescue.
TheAutonomousshipisnotexcludedfrom
ChapterI,thusthephrases“shallbesufficientlyand
efficientlymanned”and“shallbeprovidedwithan
appropriateminimumsafemanningdocumentor
equivalent”,meansthatsomehowtheserequirements
mustbefulfilled,otherwisetherulemustbeadapted
toreflectthenewrealityofashipwithoutcrewon
board.Ontheotherhand,asalreadymentioned,most
oftheAutonomousshipprojectsincorporateatleast
oneRemoteControlCentre(YaraBirkelandproject
willusethree).Theseremotestationswill(hopefully)
bemannedwithsufficientpersonnel,whilethe
“efficiency”requirementmaybecoveredbythewide
rangeofhigh‐techsystems(varioussensors,
computers,automations,remotecontrolledmachines
etc.).Thiscombinationwillassisttheremote
commandandcontrolofthevessel,andwillfulfilthe
requirementsofRegulation14.
3.2 STCW
TheSTCW(InternationalConventiononStandardsof
Training,CertificationandWatchkeepingfor
Seafarers)establishedthebasicinternational
6Vessels using port facilities may be subject to
inspections and additional control measures.
standardsinthisfield[21].TheConventionwas
adoptedin1978andwentintoforcein1984.
Todayitisapplicabletopersonnelonboardaship
(a.k.a.seafarers,crewetc.)notpersonswhoare
responsibleforoperatinganAutonomousshipfroma
remote‐controlcentre(RCS)basedonshoreoratany
otherrelevantlocationotherthantheshipherself,nor
theprogrammerswhohavepre‐programmedher
autonomouscoursebeforeshegoesunderway.These
personnelarenotregulatedbySTCW,althoughthey
havebeendelegatedtheauthoritytocontrol
Autonomousships.
Additionally,underUNCLOS,Art.94(4)(b),flag
statesmustensurethateachshipis“inthechargeofa
master...whopossess[es]appropriatequalifications,in
particularinseamanship,navigation,communicationsand
marineengineering”.AsVealandTsimplisargue[39],
theobviousquestionis“whetheritispossibleforan
unmannedship,byitsverydefinition,tohaveamaster”.
Furthermore,theworkloadoftheonshorepersonnel
fortheRemote‐ControlCentresisexpectedtobequite
heavy.A“shorebasedmaster”assistedbyoneto
threeoperatorsmaycontrolasmallflotillaof
autonomousvesselssimultaneously.Theminimum
numberofsuchvesselswhichareallowedtobe
handledatoncehasnotyetbeendetermined.
Theconditions,whichvarydependingonthe
geographicalarea,thetypesofcargo,theweather
conditions,whetheravesselisarrivingatorsailing
fromaport,thesafety,thesecurity,thefatigueofthe
operators,whattheacceptedminimumprevious
experienceonboardsameorsimilartypesofshipsis,
andtheupdatedcompetencytests,allhavetobe
seriouslyconsidered.Theseprerequisitesmustbe
incorporatedintoexistingSTCW,orasimilar
conventionspecificallytailoredfortheneedsof
Autonomousships.Inaddition,trainingrequirements
andcertificationschemesmustbeadoptedinline
withtheinternationallyacceptedstandardssimilarto
thosewhichapplytotheVesselTrafficServices(VTS)
operators.
Finally,althoughlabourlawwouldapplytothe
operatorsoftheRemoteControlCentresor thepre‐
programmersofatotallyAutonomousship,specific
rulessimilartothoseapplicabletoseafarers(suchas
thedutytoreportsignalsofdistress,etc.),mayneed
tobeadjustedandappliedaswell.
3.3 COLREG
TheConventionontheInternationalRegulationsfor
PreventingCollisionsatSea(COLREG)(Adopted:
1972‐Intoforce:1977),revisedtheInternational
RegulationsforpreventingCollisionatSeaof19607.
TheyarepublishedbytheInternationalMaritime
Organization(IMO)andamongotherissues,they
definethenavigationrules(a.k.aʺRulesoftheroadʺ)
tobefollowedbyshipsandothervesselsatseato
preventcollisionsbetweentwoormorevessels[5].
7Marsden, Reginald. G, (2003), Collision at sea,
Sweet and Maxwell
342
Theyapplytoallvesselsuponthehighseasandin
allwatersconnectedtherewithnavigablebyseagoing
vessels.UnderRule3“GeneralDefinitions”
paragraph(a),theexplanationofthewordʺvesselʺis
givenas“everydescriptionofwatercraft,includingnon‐
displacementcraftandseaplanes,usedorcapableofbeing
usedasameansoftransportationonwater.”This
definitiondoesnotexcludetheAutonomousship
from beingcharacterisedasa“vessel”.Rules2,5,6,
7,8,17,19and20willbeanalysedinrelationto
Autonomousshipoperations.
Rule2:Thisrulemustbeadjustedtoreflectthe
absenceofmasterandcrewontheAutonomousship.
Apossible“transfer”ofresponsibilityfromtheon‐
boardmasterandcrewtotheshore(orelsewhere)
basedpersonnel(e.gControlCentreetc.)mustcover
the“ordinarypracticeofseamen”.Thisseemstooblige
anyfutureControlCentremanningschemetoinclude
personnelwithadequateseamanshipexperience.
Rule5:Althoughitmaybepossibletosubstitute
thehuman“sightandhearing”withtechnicalmeans
suchassupersensitivemicrophonesandultra‐high
analysisandvisioncameras,thisRuleisthesubjectof
muchdebateregardingtheeffectivenessofsuch
means.Theexpression“properlook‐outbysightand
hearing”followedbythephrase“aswellasbyall
availablemeansappropriateintheprevailing…”indicates
thatALLothertechnicalmeanshavealreadybeen
considered,andtheimportanceofhumansenses(in
particularthefacultyofsight,andhearingbywhich
thebodyperceivesexternalstimuli),judgmentand
experiencedreaction,isdeemednecessaryasalast
resorttoavoidacollision.
Rule6:Thedefinitionof“safespeed”and“proper
andeffectiveaction”isrelatedtothecollision
avoidance.Intheeventthatacollisionfinallyoccurs,
thespeedthatwaschosenwouldbecharacterisedas
“unsafe”becauseoftheresult.Thisrulecombined
withpreviousrule,Rule5,makesitessentialto
adjusttheexpressionordefineotherprotective
measures.Asuitableamendmentmightread,‘an
autonomousshipwithsuchcharacteristics(shape,
cargoload,etc.)sailingundertheseweatherandsea
stateconditions,muststayclearofanyothervessel
byadistanceofxwhenunderwaywithspeedofy.’
Rule7:Thisrule,combinedwithRule5andRule6
dictatestheimportanceofappropriatejudgementand
seamanshipto“determineifriskofcollisionexists”.
Althoughitisplausibleforthiskindofrisk
assessmentandmitigationtobegeneratedfroma
remote‐controlstation,the“scantyradarinformation”
phraseindicatesonceagaintheimportanceofthe
audioandvisualinformationtoahumanpresenceon
board.
Rule8:AsinRule2,goodseamanshipisdeemed
essentialforthepreventionofcollision.The
InternationalConventionofStandardsofTraining,
CertificationandWatchkeepingforSeafarers(STCW)
whichintroducedthebasicinternationalstandardsin
thisfield,mustbetheguide(inpartoratleastasa
goodreference)forthebasictrainingoftheshore‐
basedoperatorsoftheAutonomousships.
Rule17:Thereisdoubtconcerningtheefficient
andeffective“manoeuvreofthelastsecond”without
theinterventionofahumanpresenceonboard.
However,thereisthephysicaldelayofthehuman
brainasitdecidestheexecutionofthemanoeuvre.
Absolutelyreliable,safe,anddelay‐free
communicationscoupledwithsecureandfastdata
transferbetweentheautonomousshipandthecontrol
centremustexist.
Rule19:Thehearingofthefogsignalofanother
vesselasdescribedinRule19,obligesthevesselin
questiontotakeallappropriatemeasuresforaltering
herspeedand/orcourseinordertonavigateinsuch
awaythatwillavoidthecollision.Onceagainand
similartoRule5,theword“hears”impliestheneedof
ahumanpresenceonboard.
Rule20:Navigationallightsandshapesare
paramounttothesafetyoftheshipswhenunderway.
Inahypotheticalscenariowhereallavailable
electromagneticandelectroacousticnavigationaland
surveillancemeansoftheshipsinquestionare
operatingproperly,safenavigationandcollision
avoidancearemostlyassured.Unfortunately,there
areplentyofrecordedaccidentsatseawherethe
aboveweretrue,buttheoperators(Officerofthe
watch,Navigator,Radaroperatoretc.)duetofatigue
orotherreasons,failedtoproperlyevaluateor
processthe“message”fromthemachines.
Fortunately,therearenumerousotherexamplesof
last‐secondcourseand/orspeedalterationand
collisionavoidancesduetotherecognitionofthe
navigationallightsandshapesshown“withthe
keepingofaproperlook‐out”.
3.4 MARPOL
MARPOL(TheInternationalConventionforthe
PreventionofPollutionfromShips,1973),as
amendedin1978,setsthestandardsforthe
preventionofpollutionbyoil,chemicals,harmful
substances,andgarbage.Ithasbeeninforcesince
1983anditsobjectiveistopreservethemarine
environmentfrompollution[17].Beingcrewless,an
Autonomousshipwillhavenogarbageandhuman
wasteofwhichtodispose.
Inaddition,theintentionalpollutionbyoil,
chemicals,andotherharmfulsubstances,whichmay
occurwiththecomplicityofsomeorallthemembers
ofacrew,isnotpossible.Strictregulationsandrecord
keepingofallelectronicorders(e‐Orders)fromthe
RemoteControlCentretotheAutonomousshipwill
preventanysuchactions.
However,unintentionalpollution,eitherasthe
resultofanaccident(collision,malfunction,
cyberattack,virus,etc.)orduetounforeseenreasons
(heavyweather,capsize,explosion,etc.)would
continuetobeaproblem.Insuchsituations,atimely
andefficientresponseisofparamountimportance,
andisfurtheranalysedinparagraphs3.7and3.8.
3.5 SAR
TheSARconvention(InternationalConventionon
MaritimeSearchandRescue)wasadoptedin1979
andisaimedatdevelopinganinternationalSARplan
[19].Therescueofpersonsindistressatseais
coordinatedbyaSARorganizationorbyco‐operation
343
betweenneighbouringSARorganizationswhen
necessary.Theobligationofshipstoassistvesselsin
distresspreviouslyexistedbothintraditionandin
internationaltreatiessuchasSOLAS.Withthe
adoptionoftheSARConvention,aninternational
systemwascreated,coveringsearchandrescue
operationsonaworldwidescale.SARandGuidelines
ontheTreatmentofPersonsRescuedatSea
(RESOLUTIONMSC.167(78)adoptedon20May
2004)involvemannedvesselsandnoreferenceis
madetoAutonomousones.
SARRegulation3.1.9specificallyreferstothe
masterofthevessel,whileUNCLOSArticle98(1)
Dutytorenderassistance,demandsthateveryState
“requirethemasterofashipflyingitsflag,insofarashe
candosowithoutseriousdangertotheship,thecrewor
thepassengers:(a)torenderassistancetoanypersonfound
atseaindangerofbeinglost;(b)toproceedwithall
possiblespeedtotherescueofpersonsindistress,...(c)
afteracollision,torenderassistancetotheothership,its
crewanditspassengersand,...”
Anyseafarerwhohaseverbeeninvolvedina
SearchandRescueoperation,knowsverywellthe
mental,psychological,emotional,andphysicalstress,
thechallenges,andthedifficultyinproperlyfulfilling
suchatask.Thiskindofoperationinvolvestherescue
oflifeindangeratseaandassuch,generatesnotonly
operationalandinsuranceobligationsbutalsoethical
ones.TheresponsibilitiesofContracting
GovernmentsandMastersincludetheassistanceand
embarkationofrescuedsurvivorson‐boardtheir
vesselswhenpossibleandanumberofother
supportiveactionsinrelationtotheoperation.
IntheeventthatanAutonomousshipiscloseto
suchaninstance,shemostprobablywillnotbeable
toprovidetherequiredassistanceanditmayalsobe
difficulttoavoidamanoverboardoranunconscious
castaway.
FortheAutonomousship,suchactionsrangefrom
beingverydifficulttobeingimpossibletoperform.A
properadjustmentoranexemptionofAutonomous
shipsfromtheSearchandRescueoperationsseemsto
bethemostappropriatesolution.However,itshould
benotedthatanexemptionofANYkindofvesselat
seafromtheSARinvolvementandobligations,may
raisetheconcernofseafarerswithrespecttohowthe
shippingindustry,variousregulatorybodies,and
relativeorganizationsregardtherescueoftheirlives
atsea.
3.6 RISKASSESSMENTANDRESPONSETO
EMERGENCIES
ExtensiveresearchonthetopicofRiskAssessment
andResponsetoEmergencieshasalreadybeen
conductedintheMUNINproject,includinganalysis
oftopicssuchastheUnmannedshipandShore
ControlCentre,Unmannedmaintenanceand
technicaloperationprinciples,Heavyweather
implications,Sensorsystems,andCybersecurity.
Chaptertwoof“MUNIND9.2:Qualitative
assessment”describesindetailtherisksrelatedtothe
operationofanunmanneddrybulkcarrier.Potential
hazardswereidentified,theexpectedfrequenciesand
consequencesofincidentsrelatedtothehazardswere
rated,andtheriskwascalculatedasafunctionofthe
frequencyandconsequencesofanincident.A
completelistoftheidentifiedhazardswiththeresults
oftheriskratingprojectcanbefoundinAnnexB:
HazardAnalysisresultsoftheMUNIND9.2paper.
InregardtotheresponseofanAutonomousship
duringanemergencysituation,thereareanumberof
issuesthatmustbeanalysed.Forexample,under
UNCLOSArticle98(1)assistanceindistresssituations
istheobligationofallvesselssailingintheareaofthe
incident,althoughtheriskssuchassistancecould
posetothecrew,itspassengers,andtheshipitself
mustallbetakenintoconsideration.
TheArticledelegatestheauthorityandburdenof
initiatingthetasktothemaster,havinginmind
mannedvesselsandnotacrewlessship.Ifweassume
thatthisobligationistransferredautomaticallytothe
“masteronshore”,anewissuearises,thatofthetime
neededforaresponsefromshoreduringemergency
situations(Hapag‐Lloyd,2016).
Totacklethesesituations,properequipmentcould
beinstalledonboardtheAutonomousship.Afterits
efficacyhadbeenverified,thisparticularsolution
wouldhavetobeacceptedanditmayincreasethe
overallstructuralcost,minimizingtheeconomic
benefitsofthecrewlessvessel.
3.7 MAINTENANCE
Oneofthemostimportantfactorsofthesafetyand
seaworthinessofashipistheproper,daily,
periodical,andtimelymaintenanceofallhersystems,
structures,andhull.
Alonglistofperiodicalmaintenanceprocedures,
butalsoofemergency(orunforeseenfailure)fixes
existsonboardallships.Well‐trainedexperienced
personnelarethekeyfactorresponsibleformeeting
theserequirementssuccessfully.Thefollowingrule
setsthebasicprerequisitesforsuchactions.
Ashipunderwayisaremotesystemusually
sailingfarfrommaintenancecentres,shipyards,ports
orotherrepairfacilities.Althoughcertainincidentsor
malfunctionsmayberepairedremotelyeitherby
softwareupdates,orbythefuturisticuseof“robots
insidearobot”(i.e.aremote‐controlled
maintenanceroboton‐boardanAutonomousship),
therewillbecertaincircumstanceswherethe
presenceofanexperiencedhumanteamwouldbe
indispensable.Insuchcases(iftimeconstraintsand
thesituationpermit),theremustbetherequired
proceduresinplace,sufficientinfrastructurefacilities,
andappropriatearrangementstoreceivesuchateam.
3.8 FIREFIGHTINGANDDAMAGECONTROL
Itisexpectedthatavarietyofsensorsandsystems,to
dealwithfiredetectionandextinguishmentbutalso
damagecontrolandrepairs,willbepresentonboard
theAutonomousship.Thelevelofsophistication,the
minimumrequirements,andtheaccepted
effectivenessshallberegulatedandproperly
enforced.
344
ThecosttoprotecttheAutonomousvesselwith
suchsystemsfrompotentialfire,waterinflowor
otherdamagewillmostprobablybeconsiderable
comparedtothecostofmethodsalreadyusedon‐
boardmannedships.Intermsofareacoverage,time
efficiency,diversityofincidentmanagement,
sequenceofunpredictablefactors,andeffectiveness,it
isdifficulttoduplicatethemobilityandfocused
interventionofthefirefightinggroupsanddamage
controlparties(varyingfromonetoeightdepending
onthetypeoftheship)whodealwiththesesituations
onmannedvessels.
3.9 ISPSCODE
InresponsetotheterroristactsofSeptember11th
(2001)intheUnitedStates,theneedtoprotectthe
internationalmaritimetransportsectoragainstthe
threatofterrorismwasrecognised.Thus,onJuly1st
2004,anewmaritimesecurityregulatoryregimewas
introducedintotheInternationalConventionforthe
SafetyofLifeatSea(SOLAS),namelychapterXI‐2on
Specialmeasurestoenhancemaritimesecurity,which
includestheInternationalShipandPortFacility
Security(ISPS)Code.TheISPSCodeenteredinto
forceinDecember2002andistheresultof
cooperationbetweenGovernments,Government
agencies,localadministrations,andshippingandport
industries[16].
Inparticular,SOLASRegulationsXI‐2andXI‐3of
ChapterXI‐2–“Specialmeasurestoenhancemaritime
security”preservestheInternationalShipandPort
FacilitiesSecurityCode(ISPSCode).PartAofthe
Codeismandatory,whilepartBcontainsguidanceon
howtobestcomplywiththemandatory
requirements.
UnderRegulationXI‐2/8,“Themastershallnotbe
constrainedbytheCompany,thechartereroranyother
personfromtakingorexecutinganydecisionwhich,inthe
professionaljudgementofthemaster,isnecessaryto
maintainthesafetyandsecurityoftheship.Thisincludes
denialofaccesstopersons(exceptthoseidentifiedasduly
authorizedbyaContractingGovernment)ortheireffects
andrefusaltoloadcargo,includingcontainersorother
closedcargotransportunits”.Additionally,“If,inthe
professionaljudgementofthemaster,aconflictbetween
anysafetyandsecurityrequirementsapplicabletotheship
arisesduringitsoperations,themastershallgiveeffectto
thoserequirementsnecessarytomaintainthesafetyofthe
ship.Insuchcases,themastermayimplementtemporary
securitymeasuresandshallforthwithinformthe
Administrationand,ifappropriate,theContracting
Governmentinwhoseporttheshipisoperatingorintends
toenter.Anysuchtemporarysecuritymeasuresunderthis
regulationshall,tothehighestpossibledegree,be
commensuratewiththeprevailingsecuritylevel.When
suchcasesareidentified,theAdministrationshallensure
thatsuchconflictsareresolvedandthatthepossibilityof
recurrenceisminimised.”
Otherregulationsinthischapterrequireallships
tobeequippedwithashipsecurityalertsystem,to
provideinformationtotheIMO,andtobeinfull
controlinport(whichincludesdealingwith
circumstancessuchasadelay,detention,anda
restrictionofoperations,includingmovementwithin
theportorexpulsionofashipfromport).
Inordertoaccomplishtheseobjectives,SOLAS
ContractingGovernments,portauthorities,and
shippingcompanies“arerequired,undertheISPSCode,
todesignateappropriatesecurityofficersandpersonnel,on
eachship,portfacilityandshippingcompany”.These
securityofficers,designatedPortFacilitySecurity
Officers(PFSOs),ShipSecurityOfficers(SSOs),and
CompanySecurityOfficers(CSOs)mustassess,
prepare,andimplementeffectivesecurityplansthat
areabletomanageanypotentialsecuritythreat.
AsfarastheAutonomousshipisconcerned,the
absenceof“securityofficersandpersonnel”,presentsa
serioussecuritygapwhichmustberemediatedeither
byapplyingappropriateriskmitigationsystemsand
methods,orbyexcludingthisparticulartypeofvessel
fromthisobligationduringdeep‐seanavigation.The
lattermaybeachievedbyassigninggeographicareas
closetothePortLimitswhereateamofproperly
trained,qualifiedpersonnelwillattestthatthevessel
issafeandsecuretoleaveorentertheport.
3.10 CYBERSECURITY
AccordingtotheMerriamWebsterdictionary,the
definitionofcybersecurityis“measurestakentoprotect
acomputerorcomputersystem(asontheInternet)against
unauthorizedaccessorattack”,whiletheonlineOxford
dictionarydefines‘cybersecurity’as“Thestateofbeing
protectedagainstthecriminalorunauthorizeduseof
electronicdata,orthemeasurestakentoachievethis”.
ISO/IEC27032defines“Cybersecurity”or
“Cyberspacesecurity”,asthe“preservationof
confidentiality,integrityandavailabilityofinformationin
theCyberspace”.TheCyberspaceisdefinedas“the
complexenvironmentresultingfromtheinteractionof
people,softwareandservicesontheInternetbymeansof
technologydevicesandnetworksconnectedtoit,which
doesnotexistinanyphysicalform”8
TheInternationalTelecommunicationsUnion
(ITU),whichisa specialized United Nations agency for
information and communication technologies, initsITU‐
TX.1205(4/2008)document,definescybersecurityas
“thecollectionoftools,policies,securityconcepts,security
safeguards,guidelines,riskmanagementapproaches,
actions,training,bestpractices,assuranceandtechnologies
thatcanbeusedtoprotectthecyberenvironmentand
organizationanduserʹsassets.Organizationanduserʹs
assetsincludeconnectedcomputingdevices,personnel,
infrastructure,applications,services,telecommunications
systems,andthetotalityoftransmittedand/orstored
informationinthecyberenvironment.Cybersecurity
strivestoensuretheattainmentandmaintenanceofthe
securitypropertiesoftheorganizationanduserʹsassets
againstrelevantsecurityrisksinthecyberenvironment.
Thegeneralsecurityobjectivescomprisethefollowing:
Availability,Integrity(whichmayincludeauthenticityand
non‐repudiation)and,Confidentiality.”
SincetheAutonomousshipconceptwilldepend
heavilyoninformationtechnologysystemson‐board
andashore,thereisafargreaterlikelihoodofacyber‐
8http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?c
snumber=44375
345
attackwhencomparedtoaconventionalvessel,
althoughthismightnotbethecaseundercertain
circumstances.Theadvanceoftechnologyhasalready
“digitised”awidespectrumofprocessesand
proceduresonboardshipsfromsteering,propulsion,
andcargocontroltoECDIS,GPS,AIS,and
communicationsystems.Alltheabovecomputerised
processesarepotentialcyber‐attacktargets.Onthe
otherhand,marineinsuranceforcyber‐attackperilsis
notnew,andthustheautonomousshipconceptmay
wellbeincludedinsuchprovisions.Althoughthe
threatofacyber‐attackisgenerallyexcludedfromthe
InstituteCyberAttackExclusionClause(CL380)
10/11/2003(forloss,damage,orliabilitycausedeither
directlyorindirectlybytheuseofacomputerandits
associatedsystemsandsoftware),intheProtection
andIndemnityInsurancesector,alimitofUS$30
millionpershipexiststomitigatesuchthreats(unless
theattackisanactofterrorismorwar).Althougha
plethoraofdefinitionsandaholisticapproachtothe
issueexists,ashasalreadybeenshowninthe
previousparagraph,on23rdofNovember2017,IHS
FairplayDailymaritimeshippingnewsrevealedthat
duringFebruaryofthesameyear,hackerstook
controlofacontainership’snavigationalsystemsfor
almost10hours.ThevesselwasnotanAutonomous
orremote‐controlledvessel,buta“conventional”
containership.
3.11 INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY
TheAutonomousshipwillbedependentoncomputer
systemsnotonlyforthevariousrequiredfunctionsto
sailwithsafety,butalsoforaseriesofupdatesrelated
totheconditionofthevesselwhenatsea,duetothe
factthatphysicalinspectionswillmainlybepossible
inport.AsRødseth,H.,BrageMo,B.(2014)observed,
theuseofKeyPerformanceIndicators(KPIs)willbe
veryusefulinmonitoringdifferentpartsoftheship.
Variousdatawillberecorded,measured,and
analysedinordertomonitortheintegrityoftheship’s
structureandthefunctionalityoftheequipmentand
themachinery.TheRemoteControlCentrewillplay
animportantroleduringthisprocessbycoordinating
andschedulingmaintenanceusingthedatareceived
fromtheship.
3.12 LIABILITY
Liability,asapartoftheinsurancesystem,protects
theinsuredfromtherisksposedbylawsuitsand
claimsalike.
Someofthemostimportantareascoveredarethe
seaworthiness(ashipʹsabilitytoperformthe
contractedvoyagesafely,eitherundercommonlaw,
orwheneverthecontractedpartiesvoluntarilyaccept
the‘Hague‐Visby’Rules),thecharter‐party(acontract
usuallybetweenaship‐ownerandacharterer),the
billoflading(adocumentsignedonbehalfofaship‐
ownerregardingtheloadedcargoʹsquantity,
condition,potentialharmfulness,andother
parameters),thecollision,andtheliabilityofthemaster.
Althoughmaritimeregulatorymattersareusually
enforcedundertheauspicesoftheIMO,liability
issuesaresubjecttovariousnationaljurisdictions.
Thelawsapplicabletoamarinedisputeandthecourt
towhichthisdisputemaybebrought,dependon
factorssuchaswheretheepisodehappened,its
nature,theflagofthevessels,andthenationalityof
thecrews.
Additionalcontractualprovisionsandlegal
requirementssuchasTheHague‐VisbyRules,require
theimplementationofcertainresponsibilitiesbythe
masterandthecrew,thuscreatingadilemmafor
Autonomousships.
Forexample,underTheHague‐VisbyRules,
Art.IIIr.2thecareofcargorequiresaphysical
inspectionandhumaninterventionwhenrequiredfor
somegoodssuchasthedangerousones.Wheneveran
unsafeorhazardouscargoneedstobejettisonedor
neutralisedwhileanAutonomousshipisunderway,
onlytheexistenceofacrewon‐boardislikelyto
preventaccidentsandkeepthevesselseaworthy.
3.13 INSURANCE
Marineinsurancecoversawidespectrumofissues
varyingfromtheHull,Machinery,andCargotoother
Third‐Partyliabilitycoverageandisregulated
throughtheMarineInsuranceActof1906(MIA),
underEnglishlaw.NotonlydoestheActaffect
marineinsuranceforships,cargos,andtheProtection
andIndemnitycover,butithasalsoinfluencedthe
subjectmatterworldwideandhasbeenadoptedby
otherjurisdictionsaswell.Twomodernstatutes,the
ConsumerInsurance(Disclosureand
Representations)Actof2012(“CIDRA”)andthe
InsuranceActof2015,havemadeamendmentsto
insurancelaw.TheInsuranceActof2015inparticular
(2015c.4,aUnitedKingdomActofParliament)makes
significantreformstoinsurancelaw.
Awidelistofprerequisitesischeckedandagreed
beforeashiporitscargo(orboth)areinsured.Oneof
themostimportanttermsinmarineinsuranceisthe
“seaworthiness”ofaship,whichdependsonvarious
factors.AndrewBardot(theexecutiveofficerofthe
InternationalGroupofP&IClubswhosemembers
insure90percentoftheglobalfleet}arguesthat
“Unmannedshipsareillegalunderinternational
conventions,whichsetminimumcrewsizes.Ifdrones
don’tcomplywithsuchrules,they’dbeconsidered
unseaworthyandineligibleforinsurance”9.
3.14 QUALITYASSURANCE
UNCLOSArt.94(4)(a)requiresthat“eachship,before
registrationandthereafteratappropriateintervals,is
surveyedbyaqualifiedsurveyorofships”.Althougha
numberofclassificationsocietiesarealready
preparingsuitablechecksandcompetentsurveyors
forAutonomousShips,nostandardisationhasbeen
agreedonorintroduced.Anothercodeoftheutmost
importance,notonlyforthesafetybutalsoforthe
QualityAssuranceofthemaritimeindustryistheISM
Code.Thecodeanditscompulsorynaturewillbe
analysedinmoredetailinChapter5,whichfollows.
9http://www.synergy.ie/index.php/articles/health‐safety/item/375‐rolls‐royce‐
are‐developing‐drone‐ships
346
Inadditiontotheseregulatoryobligations,there
areanumberofQualityStandards,self‐imposedby
theindustry,whicharemostlybasedonthe
InternationalOrganizationforStandardization(ISO),
aSwiss‐basedprivateinternationalstandards
developmentandpublishingbodycomposedof
representativesfromvariousnationalstandards
organizationswithmultiplecommittees.Such
standardsincludeamongstotherstheISO9000:2015
(Internationalstandardsforqualitymanagement)
series,theISO28007‐1:2015Internationalstandards
forShipsandmarinetechnology–Guidelinesfor
PrivateMaritimeSecurityCompanies(PMSC)
providingprivatelycontractedarmedsecurity
personnel(PCASP)onboardships(andproforma
contract),andtheISO/TS29001:2010International
standardsforPetroleum,petrochemical,andnatural
gasindustriesandSector‐specificquality
managementsystems,layingdowntheRequirements
forproductandservicesupplyorganizations.As
previouslymentioned,someclassificationsocieties
havealreadystartedtolaythebasisforquality
standardsfortheautonomousship.However,thereis
notasyetasystematicapproachtothesubject.
4 ISMCODEANDTHEAUTONOMOUSSHIP
TheInternationalManagementCodefortheSafe
OperationsofShipsandforPollutionPrevention
(ISM),whichformschapterIXofSOLAS,was
introducedafteranumberofseriouspollution
accidents.(Adopted:1993‐Intoforce:1998).This
ChaptermakestheInternationalSafetyManagement
(ISM)Code,whichrequires“asafetymanagement
systemtobeestablishedbytheshipowneroranyperson
whohasassumedresponsibilityfortheship(the
ʺCompanyʺ)”,compulsory[15].
TheobjectivesoftheCodearethepreventionof
humaninjuryorlossoflife,theavoidanceofdamage
totheenvironment,andtoensuresafetyatsea.Its
aimistoapplyasafetymanagementsysteminorder
totrainthepersonnelinvolvedintheoperationofa
shiptoreactappropriatelyduringpossibleemergency
situations.Everyorganisation(shippingcompany)is
allowedtodevelopitsownSafetyManagement
System(SMS)usingpolicies,procedures,instructions,
andinternalauditsinordertodiscover,report,and
correctanydeficiencies.
Paragraph5“Masters’Responsibilityand
Authority”,andparagraph6“Resourcesand
Personnel”oftheCodemustbeeitheralteredby
includingadefinitionofa“Shore‐based”masterand
“crew/remotecontroloperators”withthesame
responsibilitiesoftheon‐boardMasterandcrew,or
beadjustedtothenewautonomousship’screwless
naturebyexcludingsuchvesselsfromthe
responsibilitiesofparagraphs5.1.1to5.1.4,6.2,6.6ʺ,
6.7,andparagraph’s7phrase“thesafetyofthe
personnel”.Paragraphs5.1.5,5.2and6.1,6.3,6.4,6.5
and7(withoutthephrase“thesafetyofthepersonnel”)
shouldcontinuetoapply,regardlessofwhetherthe
crewisonboardorinremotecontrolcentres.
5 CONCLUSIONS
Atpresent,internationalconventions,rules,and
codessuchastheUNCLOS,SOLAS,COLREG,
MARPOL,STCW,ISM,andSAR(tonamebuta
few)donotincludetheAutonomousshipconcept
asadefinition,orasapotentialmodusoperandi.
Furthermore,theexistingregulationsandthe
traditionallyusedphrasingchallengeratherthan
facilitatetheoperationaldeploymentofsuch
vesselsinthefuture.
Acautiousreviewofallrelevantregulatory,
operational,andqualityassuranceframeworks,
followedbytheproperamendmentsisneededin
ordertolegallyshieldandtechnicallyassurethe
Autonomousshipconceptthusmakingitaccepted
byandfavourabletothemaritimecommunityand
theshippingindustryalike.
Throughouttheresearch,itwasobservedthat
therewereanumberofaccidentscausedby
humanerror,affirmingtheusefulnessofthe
Autonomousshipconcept.Nonearaccidentsor
potentialcatastrophespreventedbyhuman
interventionwerementioned(althoughtheyvery
oftenoccur),whichmakesanycomparisontothe
disasterscausedbyhumanmistakesimpossible.It
issuggestedthatfurtherexaminationofsuchnear
incidentswillhelpinunderstandingthe
Autonomousship’srealcontributiontomaritime
safety.
Finally,furtherresearchonissuessuchasthe
ethicalconcernsregardingtheuseofautonomous
systemsreplacinghumans,thepsychological
impactonseafarersofsuchause,thedegradation
ofseamanship,andthepotentiallossoftimeatsea
thatwouldbeexperiencedbyasignificantnumber
ofcompetencemariners,shouldbeconsidered.
REFERENCES
[1]Autonomousships‐WhitePaper(2016),Future
MaritimeNautics,(AccessedMay2017)
http://www.futurenautics.com/2016/11/white‐paper‐
autonomous‐ships
[2]BlankeM,HenriquesM,BangJ,(2016)“Apre‐analysis
onautonomousships”theTechnicalUniversityof
Denmark(DTU).
[3]BryantD.T.(1991)TheHumanElementinShipping
Casualties.ReportpreparedfortheDept.ofTransport,
MarineDirectorate,UnitedKingdom.
[4]BurmeisteraH‐C,,BruhnaW.etal.(2014),“Can
unmannedshipsimprovenavigational
safety?”,(AccessedMay2017)
http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/19820
7/local_198207.pdfTransportResearchArena2014,
Paris.
[5]COLREG(1972),ConventionontheInternational
RegulationsforPreventingCollisionsatSea,IMO.
[6]ChrisHolder,VikramKhurana,FayeHarrison,Louisa
Jacobs(2016),Roboticsandlaw:Keylegaland
regulatoryimplicationsoftheroboticsage(PartIofII)
ComputerLaw&SecurityReview32pp383–402.
[7]ChrisHolder,VikramKhurana,JoannaHook,Gregory
Bacon,RachelDay(2016),Roboticsandlaw:Keylegal
andregulatoryimplicationsoftheroboticsage(partIIof
II)ComputerLaw&SecurityReview32pp557–576.
[8]DavidAMindell(2015)Ourrobotsourselves,robotics
andthemythsofautonomy,NewYork:Penguin
RandomHouse.
347
[9]DezeenLimited.(2016).Rolls‐Royceremote‐controlled
cargoshipas“futureofthemaritimeindustry.”
RetrievedMay2,2017,from
https://www.dezeen.com/2016/06/29/rolls‐royce‐remote‐
controlled‐autonomous‐self‐driving‐cargo‐ship‐future‐
maritime‐industry/
[10]DNV‐GL,Maritime,(AccessedMay2017)
https://www.dnvgl.com/maritime/index.html
[11]Endsley,M.R.andJonesD.G.(2012)Designingfor
SituationAwareness:AnApproachtoUserCentered
Design(2ndEdition),TaylorandFrancis,London.
[12]Forbes,(23Oct2017),“Rolls‐RoyceAndGoogle
PartnerToCreateSmarter,AutonomousShipsBasedOn
AIAndMachineLearning”,ArticlebyBernardMarr
https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2017/10/23/r
olls‐royce‐and‐google‐partner‐to‐create‐smarter‐
autonomous‐ships‐based‐on‐ai‐and‐machine‐
learning/#3ddceba16dfe(AccessedOct2017)
[13]Hapag‐Lloyd.(2016).“Containershipssoontosail
unmanned?”RetrievedOctober2017from
https://www.hapag‐lloyd.com/en/news‐insights/
insights/2015/08/container‐ships‐soon‐to‐sail‐
unmanned_42532.html
[14]InternationalUnderwritingAssociationofLondon
Limited,(2016),CyberRisksandInsurance.An
IntroductiontoCrossClassCyberLiabilities,London
(AccessedNOVEMBER2017)http://www.
maritimelondon.com/wp‐
content/uploads/2016/01/005_Cyber_Risks_Combined_1
10116.pdf
[15]INTERNATIONALMARITIMEORGANIZATION.
(1997).Internationalsafetymanagementcode(ISM
code)andguidelinesontheimplementationoftheISM
code.London,InternationalMaritimeOrganization.
(AccessedOctober2017)http://www.imo.org/en/
OurWork/HumanElement/SafetyManagement/Pages/IS
MCode.aspx
[16]IMO(2003).ISPSCode:InternationalShipandPort
FacilitySecurityCodeandSOLASamendmentsadopted
12December2002.London,
Ihttp://www.imo.org/blast/mainframe.asp?topic_id=897
(AccessedNov2017).
[17]IMO(2011).MARPOLConsolidatededition2011:
articles,protocols,annexesandunifiedinterpretationsof
theInternationalConventionforthePreventionof
PollutionfromShips,1973,asmodifiedbythe1978and
1997protocols.http://www.imo.org/en/about/
conventions/listofconventions/pages/international‐
convention‐for‐the‐prevention‐of‐pollution‐from‐ships‐
(marpol).aspx(AccessedNov2017).
[18]IMOe‐Navigation,InternationalMaritime
Organization,http://www.imo.org/ourwork/safety/
navigation/pages/enavigation.aspx(AccessedMay2017)
[19]IMO,InternationalConventiononMaritimeSearchand
Rescue,(1979),1403UNTS,availableat:
http://www.refworld.org/docid/469224c82.html
(AccessedDecember2017)
[20]IMO(1974),InternationalConventionfortheSafetyof
LifeatSea(SOLAS),http://www.imo.org/
en/About/Conventions/ListOfConventions/Pages/Intern
ational‐Convention‐for‐the‐Safety‐of‐Life‐at‐Sea‐
(SOLAS),‐1974.aspx(AccessedOctober2017)
[21]IMO,&INTERNATIONALCONFERENCEON
TRAININGANDCERTIFICATIONOFSEAFARERS.
(1993).STCW1978:InternationalConventionon
StandardsofTraining,Certification,andWatchkeeping
forSeafarers,1978:withresolutionsadoptedbythe
InternationalConferenceonTrainingandCertification
ofSeafarers,1978.London,(AccessedNovember2017)
http://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/humanelement/trainin
gcertification/pages/stcw‐convention.aspx
[22]ISO9000:2015internationalstandardsforquality
management.Genève,Switzerland,International
OrganizationforStandardization.
https://www.iso.org/standard/45481.html(Accessed
Nov2017)
[23]ISO9001:2015internationalstandardsforquality
managementsystemsrequirements.Genève,
Switzerland,InternationalOrganizationfor
Standardization.https://www.iso.org/iso‐9001‐quality‐
management.html(AccessedNovember2017)
[24]ISO28007‐1:2015(en)InternationalstandardsforShips
andmarinetechnology—GuidelinesforPrivate
MaritimeSecurityCompanies(PMSC)providing
privatelycontractedarmedsecuritypersonnel(PCASP)
onboardships(andproformacontract).Genève,
Switzerland,
https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:28007:‐1:ed‐
1:v1:en(AccessedNovember2017)
[25]ISO/TS29001:2010Internationalstandardsfor
Petroleum,petrochemicalandnaturalgasindustries ‐‐
Sector‐specificqualitymanagementsystems‐
Requirementsforproductandservicesupply
organizations.Genève,Switzerland,
https://www.iso.org/standard/55499.html(Accessed
November2017)
[26]Jokioinen,E.(2016).Remoteandautonomousships‐
thenextsteps.(AccessedMay2017)http://www.rolls‐
royce.com/~/media/Files/R/Rolls‐
Royce/documents/customers/marine/ship‐intel/aawa‐
whitepaper‐210616.pdf
[27]KoopmanP.&WagnerM.(2016),Challengesin
AutonomousVehicleTestingandValidation.
[28]Lloyd’sRegister(2016),“Cyber‐enabledships.
Deployinginformationandcommunicationstechnology
inshipping”–Lloyd’sRegister’sapproachtoassurance
Firstedition,February2016.
[29]MarineInsurance(1906)Act
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Edw7/6/41/conte
nts(AccessedNovember2017).
[30]McCallumM.C.,RabyM.,andRothblumA.M.(1996),
“ProceduresforInvestigatingandReportingHuman
FactorsandFatigueContributionstoMarineCasualties.
Washington,D.C.:U.S.Dept.ofTransportation,U.S.
CoastGuardReportNo.CG‐D‐09‐97.AD‐A323392.
[31]MUNIND9.3:Quantitativeassessment(2015)–FP7
GA‐No314286.
[32]NomaTomotsugu,(2016)ʺExistingconventionsand
unmannedships‐needforchanges?ʺ.WorldMaritime
UniversityDissertation527.http://commons.wmu.se/
all_dissertations/527(AccessedOctober2017).
[33]RødsethH.,BrageMoB.(2014),“MUNINDeliverable
D6.7:Maintenanceindicatorsandmaintenance
managementprinciplesforautonomousengineroom”.
[34]RodsethH.(2015),“RiskAssessmentforanUnmanned
MerchantShip”,TransNav,TheInternationalJournalon
MarineNavigationandSafetyofSeaTransportation
Volume9Number3September2015.
[35]ROLLSROYCEWHITEPAPER:Shipintelligence‐
Transformingfuturemarineoperations,
http://www.rolls‐royce.com/products‐and‐
services/marine/ship‐intelligence.aspx#section‐
discover/research(AccessedOctober2017).
[36]RothblumA,(2000),“HumanErrorandMarineSafety”,
U.S.CoastGuardResearch&DevelopmentCenter.
(AccessedSeptember2017)http://bowles‐
langley.com/wp‐
content/files_mf/humanerrorandmarinesafety26.pdf
[37]UnitedNations,(2008),“AchievingSustainable
DevelopmentandPromotingDevelopment
Cooperation”,NY,NewYork.Retrievedfrom
http://www.un.org/en/ecosoc/docs/pdfs/fina_08‐
45773.pdf(AccessedMay2017)
[38]UniversityofOslo(UiOFacultyofLaw),(2014)“The
productionofunmannedvesselsanditslegal
implicationsinthemaritimeindustry”
[39]VealR.,TsimplisM.(2017),“TheIntegrationOf
UnmannedShipsIntoTheLexMaritima”,Lloydʹs
MaritimeandCommercialLawQuarterly.
348
https://www.i‐law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=376831
(AccessedNovember2017).
[40]ZakirulBhuiyan(2016),ArticleonBDMarinersfoundat
http://bdmariners.org/bmcs‐magazine‐2016‐
autonomous‐ships‐and‐the‐future‐zakirul‐bhuiyan‐
23/#sthash.U5CVsEIB.dpbs(AccessedMay2017).