ArticlePDF Available

Factors Associated With Early Deaths Following Neonatal Male Circumcision in the United States, 2001–2010



We sought to quantify early deaths following neonatal circumcision (same hospital admission) and to identify factors associated with such mortality. We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent circumcision while hospitalized during the first 30 days of life from 2001-2010 using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Over 10 years, 200 early deaths were recorded among 9,833,110 subjects (1 death per 49,166 circumcisions). Note: this figure should not be interpreted as causal but correlational: it may include both under-counting and over-counting of deaths attributable to circumcision. Compared to survivors, subjects who died following newborn circumcision were more likely to have associated co-morbid conditions, such as cardiac disease (OR: 697.8 [378.5-1286.6] p<0.001), coagulopathy (OR: 159.6 [95.6-266.2] p<0.001), fluid and electrolyte disorders (OR: 68.2 [49.1-94.6] p<0.001), or pulmonary circulatory disorders (OR: 169.5 [69.7-412.5] p<0.001). Recognizing these factors could inform clinical and parental decisions, potentially reducing associated risks.
Factors Associated with Early Deaths Following
Neonatal Male Circumcision in the United States, 2001-
Authors: Brian D. Earp1, Veerajalandhar Allareddy2, Veerasathpurush Allareddy3, Alexandre
T. Rotta4
Affiliations: 1 Yale-Hastings Program in Ethics and Health Policy, Yale University and The Hastings Center
2Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Stead Family Children’s Hospital, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA;
3Department of Orthodontics, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Dentistry; 4Division of Pediatric
Critical Care Medicine, UH Rainbow Babies & Children’s Hospital, Case Western
Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.
Key words: Circumcision, Predictors of Mortality, Neonates.
We sought to quantify early deaths following neonatal circumcision (same hospital
admission) and to identify factors associated with such mortality. We performed a
retrospective analysis of all infants who underwent circumcision in an inpatient hospital
setting during the first 30 days of life from 2001-2010 using the National Inpatient Sample
(NIS). Over 10 years, 200 early deaths were recorded among 9,833,110 subjects (1 death
per 49,166 circumcisions). Note: this figure should not be interpreted as causal but
correlational as it may include both under-counting and over-counting of deaths attributable
to circumcision. Compared to survivors, subjects who died following newborn circumcision
were more likely to have associated co-morbid conditions, such as cardiac disease (OR:
697.8 [378.5-1286.6] p<0.001), coagulopathy (OR: 159.6 [95.6-266.2] p<0.001), fluid and
electrolyte disorders (OR: 68.2 [49.1-94.6] p<0.001), or pulmonary circulatory disorders
(OR: 169.5 [69.7-412.5] p<0.001). Recognizing these factors could inform clinical and
parental decisions, potentially reducing associated risks.
Key words: circumcision, risks, death, complications, co-morbid conditions
This is the authors’ copy of an accepted manuscript, now published. Citation for the published version:
Earp, B. D., Allareddy, V., Allareddy, V., & Rotta, A. T. (in press). Factors associated with early deaths
following neonatal male circumcision in the United States, 2001-2010. Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 57, No.
13, 1532-1540.
Version of record:
Factors Associated with Early Deaths Following
Neonatal Male Circumcision in the United States, 2001-
Male circumcision is a surgery that removes part or all of the penile prepuce or foreskin.1,2 In
rare instances, the procedure is medically indicated, as in patients with recurrent, pathologic
phimosis due to balanitis xerotica obliterans.3,4 Most often, however, it is performed
nontherapeutically on healthy newborns and other male minors.5 In the United States,
circumcision is typically performed by a physician shortly after birth. With an out-of-hospital
rate of approximately 55% as of 2010,6,7 such newborn male circumcision is the most common
pediatric surgery performed in the USA.8 With the exception of Israel, it is much less common in
other Western developed nations.9,10 It is the only pediatric surgery regularly performed on
children who have not been diagnosed with a disease.
Like any surgery, circumcision carries risks. These include infection, bleeding, inflammation,
development of fistulae or skin bridges, acquired torsion, buried penis, meatal stenosis, partial
or complete penile amputation or other injury to the penis, and death.1113 Death is typically
characterized as a rare complication of circumcision, insofar as the surgery is performed in a
modern clinical setting by a well-trained provider.14 However, precise estimates of death rates
following such medicalized newborn circumcision have been notoriously difficult to establish. In
this study, we attempt to provide a large-sample estimate of the frequency of early deaths (that
is, deaths occurring during the same hospital admission) associated with newborn circumcision,
along with an account of the major factors that are correlated with such mortality.
Study Design and Description of Database
We performed a retrospective descriptive analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) for
the years 2001 to 2010. The NIS is the largest all-payer inpatient database in the United States
that provides information on close to 100 patient and hospital level variables during the index
hospitalization.15 NIS is a component of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
family of databases that include the State Inpatient Databases, Nationwide Emergency
Department Sample, State Emergency Department Databases, Ambulatory Databases, and
Hospital Re-admission Databases. The HCUP is sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ).
Up to the year 2010, the NIS database was designed such that approximately 20% of all acute
care hospitals provided data. Each of the included hospitals provided information on 100% of
hospitalizations that occurred in the selected years. Each hospitalization in the NIS database is
assigned a discharge weight variable that can be used to project to nationally representative
estimates of approximately all hospitalizations in the United States. Thus, the NIS can be used
to examine close to 20 million hospitalizations occurring in the United States annually.16 The NIS
databases have been extensively validated and to date over 1000 publications have resulted
from its analysis.17 The NIS provides information on variables such as age, sex, race, insurance
status, type of admission, co-morbid conditions, primary reason for hospitalization, procedures
performed during hospitalization, disposition status, hospital charges, length of stay in hospital,
type of hospital, geographic region of hospital, etc. The NIS has been designed to answer
questions pertaining to health care utilization, health costs, and health outcomes, including
those associated with uncommon conditions, procedures that are performed infrequently, or
outcomes that are designated clinically rare events (such as death). Using single-center studies
for examining these issues would be unviable owing to the lower statistical power with limited
samples of data and a lack of generalizability or external validity.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval
The present study used de-identified secondary datasets already in existence. The Office of
Human Subjects Oversight Board at the University of Iowa deemed this project not to meet the
regulatory definition of human subjects research and hence institutional review board (IRB)
approval was not needed.
Subject Selection
Males with ages between 0 and 30 days who underwent a circumcision procedure were
selected for inclusion in the present study. Circumcision procedures were identified by using
ICD-9-CM procedure codes in the 15 procedure fields available in the database.18 All subjects
meeting these criteria were selected regardless of race, disposition status, or other related
Key Variables
The following variables were examined in the present study.
Demographics: The demographic variables that were examined included race and insurance
status (any governmental insurance programs, private insurance, or uninsured).
Co-morbid Burden: For each patient in the study cohort, the co-morbid burden severity was
assessed using the NIS co-morbid severity files.15 NIS severity files provide data on the presence
of multiple comorbid conditions (deficiency anemias, rheumatoid arthritis/collagen vascular
diseases, chronic blood loss anemia, congestive heart failure, chronic pulmonary disease,
coagulopathy, diabetes [uncomplicated], diabetes [with complications], hypertension, liver
disease, lymphoma, fluid and electrolyte disorders, metastatic cancer, neurological disorders,
obesity, paralysis, peripheral vascular disorders, pulmonary circulation disorders, renal failure,
solid tumor without metastasis, peptic ulcer disease excluding bleeding, valvular disease, and
weight loss). For the purpose of this study, congestive heart failure, hypertension, and valvular
disease were clustered as cardiovascular disease. The presence of different co-morbid
conditions was coded as a binomial variable: “1” for presence of a specific co-morbid condition
and “0” for absence of a specific co-morbid condition. In accordance with the data user
agreement with HCUP-AHRQ, any individual cell count with ≤ 10 events was not reported.
When such low cell counts were encountered, the term “DS” was used. “DS” refers to
“discharge information suppressed.”
Hospital Characteristics: These included bed size of hospital (small, medium, or large bed-size
hospitals as defined by HCUP-AHRQ), teaching status of hospital (teaching or non-teaching
status as defined by the American Hospital Association), location of hospital (rural or urban
location), and geographic region of hospital.15
Outcome: The outcome of interest in the present study was “early” or in-hospital death. Thus,
for the purpose of this study, early circumcision deaths were deaths that occurred following the
circumcision procedure but prior to discharge, that is, within the same hospital admission as
the circumcision.
Analytical Approach
Simple descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data, including patient and hospital
related variables. The descriptives were summarized by in-hospital mortality status. For
computing nationally representative estimates, the discharge weight variable assigned to each
hospitalization was used. The stratification unit was the stratum to which each hospital
belonged. The stratum to which a hospital belonged was based on its geographic region
(Northeast, Midwest, South, or West), locality (rural or urban), hospital ownership, teaching
status of hospital, and bed size (number of beds in hospital based on geographic region and
location). Descriptive statistics were computed using SAS Version 9.4, SAS Callable SUDAAN
Version 11.0.1, and SigmaPlot Version 13.0 software.
During the study period, we identified 9,833,110 subjects who underwent a circumcision
procedure within the first 30 days of life in an inpatient hospital setting. Among these, there
were 200 deaths within the same hospital admission as the procedure, or 1 death occurring
shortly after every 49,166 circumcisions (10.2 deaths per 500,000 circumcisions). The
distribution of early circumcision deaths per study year is shown in Table 1.
Subjects who died soon after circumcision were predominantly white (63.9%), and had medical
care funded by private insurance (52.1%) or Medicaid (39.7%) (Table 2). Most deaths occurred
at teaching hospitals (80.1%), large bed-size hospitals (59.6%), and those predominantly located
in the South (33.8%) or Midwest (33%) (Table 3).
The most prevalent co-morbid conditions for this sample are shown in Table 4. Compared to
survivors, subjects who died soon after being circumcised were significantly more likely to have
associated co-morbid conditions. The presence of cardiovascular comorbidities was associated
with significantly greater odds of death (OR: 102.9 [61.7 – 171.5] p<0.001). Likewise, the
presence of coagulopathy (OR: 159.6 [95.6-266.2] p<0.001), fluid and electrolyte disorders (OR:
68.2 [49.1-94.6] p<0.001), pulmonary circulatory disorders (OR: 169.5 [69.7-412.5] p<0.001),
and neurological disorders (OR: 111.7 [45.9 – 271.6] p<0.001), were significantly associated
with greater odds of death following circumcision.
Data from this large national cohort of infants who underwent circumcision in an inpatient
hospital setting in the first 30 days of life can help to inform estimates of the risk of early death
following this procedure, especially in patients with co-morbid conditions. In the present
analysis, we identified 1 early death for every 49,166 newborn inpatient circumcisions, or 10.2
early deaths per 500,000 newborn inpatient circumcisions. We stress that this figure refers to
deaths that occurred subsequent to the circumcision but prior to discharge within the same
hospital admission; it should not be taken to refer to the frequency of deaths caused by
newborn circumcision, as the present data cannot directly support such an inference. To see
this, consider the following hypothetical cases:
Case A. Infant Adam is a seemingly healthy newborn infant who has a ritual circumcision
performed as an outpatient. He develops severe bleeding immediately following the
procedure, and is transferred to the local hospital where he requires multiple blood
transfusions. Unfortunately, he does not respond to treatment and dies two days later.
Tests later confirm that he had hemophilia.
Case B. Infant Ben is thought to be a healthy newborn delivered by cesarean section and
has a circumcision on the first day of life. On day 3, he develops refractory shock and
dies. An autopsy reveals an undiagnosed ductal-dependent cardiac lesion (interrupted
aortic arch).
Case C. Infant Charlie is circumcised in the first days of his life in a hospital inpatient
setting, but suffers a severe hypoxic-ischemic brain injury due to cardiorespiratory
arrest that occurred during the procedure. Six years later, still with severe neurologic
sequelae, Charlie dies from acute respiratory failure following aspiration pneumonia.
Case D. Infant David is circumcised in the first days of his life in a hospital inpatient
setting, but suffers a complication: too much skin is removed, leaving a tight scar around
his penis, ultimately preventing urination. A month later, David is re-admitted to the
hospital for a correction surgery to relieve his urethral obstruction, but dies due to
complications from anesthesia.
In the case of Adam, the death would be appropriately causally attributed to the newborn
circumcision in conjunction with undetected hemophilia; however, Adam’s death would not be
included in our data set since the circumcision itself was performed in an outpatient setting
whereas we looked only at data from inpatient circumcisions (according to a recent study,
between 1970 and 1996, an average of 45.4% of all circumcisions were non-hospital based or
post-discharge, i.e., “unrecorded”).19,20 Adam, then, would be an instance of undercounting a
death due to newborn circumcision for our purposes.
By contrast, Ben would be an instance of overcounting such a death: although he died during
the same hospital admission as his circumcision, and would thus be included in our data set, it
would not be appropriate to causally attribute the death to the circumcision, because of the
significant confound of the undiagnosed cardiac defect.
Finally, Charlie and David, like Adam, would also represent cases of undercounting: both deaths
are plausibly attributable to circumcision, in that, had the circumcision not occurred, neither
would the deaths from the more immediate causes21 (although this is less certain in the case of
Charlie). However, the deaths occurred sometime after the original hospital discharge and so
would not be included in our data set.
To summarize, our figure of 10.2 early deaths per 500,000 newborn inpatient circumcisions
may (1) include some deaths that were not caused by such circumcision, as well as (2) exclude
some deaths that were caused by such circumcision. It is not possible to determine how many
instances of each of these is represented in our data set. However, it must be emphasized that
our data do not cover outpatient, post-discharge, or ritual circumcisions, which, as noted, may
make up nearly half of all US circumcisions. Thus, any deaths caused by such circumcisions are
invisible to our study. This makes it likely that we have underestimated the total number of
deaths associated with newborn circumcision in the United States during the study period. With
these important caveats in mind, we ask: How does our figure compare with the previous
Prior death estimates
In 1953, Speert reported 1 death from newborn circumcision over the period 1939-1951, based
on records from the New York City Health Department.22 The total number of newborn
circumcisions during this period was unknown, but based on the assumption of a 61.27%
circumcision rate (the rate observed at a single hospital, Sloane Hospital, generalized to all
hospitals in New York City) and the further assumption that this rate remained constant over
the 12 year period, Speert estimated 1 operative death per 566,483 newborn circumcisions
(i.e., 61.27% of the 924,569 known live male births in New York City). This corresponds to <1
death per 500 000 newborn circumcisions; the death was attributed to fatal hemorrhage
following a ritual circumcision performed at-home by a Jewish mohel. The limitations of this
estimate include: (1) it is more than six decades old, and (2) its denominator is based on an
extrapolation from 1 hospital combined with data from a single city. Therefore, generalizability
may be limited.
In 1982, King reported in a commentary that 500,000 consecutive neonatal circumcisions were
performed over an unidentified period of time in New York City without any fatalities, which
entails less than 1 death per 500,000 circumcisions.23 As with the Speert estimate, this figure
concerns a single city, and therefore cannot speak to death rates elsewhere, much less
nationally. In addition, King did not provide any references for his claim, including who
performed the circumcisions, in what setting, with what instruments, etc., rendering it difficult
to interpret. In fact, it is possible that King was simply alluding to the earlier study by Speert
from nearly 30 years earlier.
In 1989, Wiswell and Geschke reported no deaths from circumcision during the first month of
life over a series of 100,157 circumcisions performed at US Army hospitals between 1980 and
1985.24 The authors acknowledge that an unknown number of circumcised boys may have later
been admitted to a civilian hospital, in which case any complications or deaths would not have
been included in their records review. There is also uncertainty about the extent to which such
findings can be generalized to non-Army hospitals during the period in question. Finally, the
estimate is more than three decades old.
In 2010, based on an analysis of US hospital discharge records, Bollinger estimated that 117
deaths related to newborn circumcision occurred in the United States in 2007 out of a total of
1,299,000 circumcisions estimated to be performed that year. This amounts to 9.01 deaths per
100,000 circumcisions or 45.03 deaths per 500,000 circumcisionsfar higher than the earlier
estimates as well as our own.25 However, Bollinger’s figure included deaths that occurred
during the entire neonatal period, up to 28 days of life. When only “early” deaths are
included—that is, deaths occurring prior to hospital release, as in our studyBollinger’s
estimate drops to 14.5 deaths per 1,299,000 circumcision procedures, or 5.6 deaths per
500,000 circumcisions, a figure that is more closely aligned with ours.
Morris et al. have critiqued the estimate by Bollinger, arguing that he must have mistakenly
assumed that sex differences in infant mortality in the United States are entirely due to
newborn circumcision, when in fact similar sex differences occur in countries with low rates of
such circumcision.26 However, Morris et al. appear to have misinterpreted the report by
Bollinger. While Bollinger does refer to a 40.4% relative higher death rate for infant males
compared to infant females in the United States, this is not reported as an overall relative death
rate, but rather one from causes that are associated with male circumcision complications,
such as infection and hemorrhage, specifically during the period of one hour after birth to
hospital release (day 2.4), the time frame in which circumcisions are typically performed.
Constraints on estimation
One of the major challenges in estimating the number of deaths in which newborn circumcision
is likely to have played a contributory role is that death certificates typically fail to mention the
underlying condition or procedure that led to the subject’s death, and instead list only the
immediate cause of death such as exsanguination or overwhelming sepsis.27 For example, a
study of children with heritable disorders who died while in a pediatric intensive care unit
showed that that the underlying disorder was left off the death certificate 41% of the time.28
Adding to the challenge is a lack of adequate record-keeping in countries where newborn
circumcision remains customary. For example, if complications are treated in a hospital or clinic
other than the one in which the original circumcision was performed, the general inability to
cross-link register data in countries such as the United States that do not have a unique medical
ID for every citizen can make it difficult or impossible to confirm that the complications were in
fact circumcision-related.29
Yet another problem is “the natural tendency of physicians not to ascribe a poor outcome to an
elective procedure,” which may lead to “gross underestimates” of the frequency of life
threatening infectious complications from circumcision.30 In support of this view, Cleary and
Kohl draw attention to a significant gap in the relevant data (internal references omitted):
In one retrospective series of more than 900,000 male births, there were no deaths
attributed to infection. The incidence of neonatal sepsis is estimated at 1:300 to 1:1,600
live births. With the usual male predominance (approximately 2:1), one might have
expected between 700 and 3,900 in this large study. Since the rate of circumcision
during the years of study was 61%, there must have been many males who were
circumcised and who became septic but in whom the two events were not judged to
have been related.30
According to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the “true incidence” of surgical
complications attributable to newborn circumcision is unknown.6 This lack of certainty is due to
disagreements about appropriate diagnostic criteria for certain complications as well as other
limitations with existing data, such as those described above.31 Other risks, including risks to the
developing nervous system and long-term risks to neuroendocrine and immune system stress
responses are even less well-studied.32 These issues should be a priority for future research.33
Our study has several limitations inherent to its retrospective design, including the lack of
granularity involving patient-level observations that is typical of a large de-identified dataset.
Nevertheless, we believe that the use of a large multi-year national dataset was the only way to
capture this relatively rare outcome that may follow neonatal male circumcision along with its
associated factors. We chose to include a more remote (2001 to 2010) sample to decrease the
likelihood that one could attempt to re-identify low prevalence events from this de-identified
sample. In addition, the NIS data sampling strategy was constant between 2001 and 2010,
changing in 2012 and once again in 2015 with the implementation of ICD 10 codes.
Another obvious limitation of our study is that it lacks a control group of intact (non-
circumcised) newborns, which would not have been possible given the design of the study.
Including intact neonates as a control group would have captured deaths that occurred in
children with severe co-morbidities that were deemed too ill to undergo circumcision, but who
otherwise would have been circumcised, or children with non-survivable malformations and
those for whom life support measures had been limited. In this context, it should be noted that
circumcision is typically performed only when the physician or other operator believes that the
newborn is stable and healthy enough to undergo surgery. Such judgments are of course
sometimes mistaken, for example when proper screening is not undertaken. However, an
infant that has been deemed to be in sufficiently good health to be operated on, and then dies
shortly after the operation, is relatively unlikely to be one with sufficiently severe co-
morbidities that these would independently explain his death without the operation. Thus,
although we emphasize once again that our findings should be taken as correlational rather
than causal, it is clear that baby boys can and do die as a result of their circumcision
procedures, including in hospital settings.3444
In keeping with the correlational nature of our results, we observed a significant increase in the
odds of death following circumcision in children with certain co-morbidities, including cardiac
disease, coagulopathy, fluid and electrolyte disorders, and pulmonary circulatory disorders.
Many, if not all of these co-morbidities can be identified a priori in neonates and their presence
should inspire caution as to whether these more vulnerable neonates are indeed able to
tolerate this particular surgical procedure and its attendant consequences (for example, pain
and related sequelae).4548 Pending further research, we suggest that the specific co-morbidities
we have identified in this study should be considered as potential contra-indications for
newborn circumcision.
In this study, using a validated multi-year national dataset, we identified 1 early death for every
49,166 newborn inpatient circumcisions, or 10.2 deaths per 500,000 newborn inpatient
circumcisions; however, this figure cannot be simply interpreted as a causal relationship, since
our study design allows for both undercounting and overcounting of deaths due to such
circumcisions and we do not know the true proportion of over-counted versus under-counted
In addition, we identified a number of co-morbid conditions that were associated with a
significant increase in the odds of death following newborn circumcision, and we have
suggested that these may need to be considered as potential contra-indications for the surgery
pending further research.
According to the AAP, repeated exposure to painful stimuli soon after birth can cause
immediate and long- term adverse outcomes, including physiologic instability and altered brain
development, as well as abnormal somatosensory and stress response systems, which can
persist into later childhood.48 The AAP therefore recommends that “every health care facility
caring for neonates should implement a pain-prevention program that includes strategies for
minimizing the number of painful procedures performed.”48 Since newborn circumcision is a
surgical procedure that inevitably causes pain as well as carries other risks, up to and including
death, and since it is performed on a healthy subject who does not require surgery on medical
grounds, it is a clear candidate for a procedure whose incidence should be minimized, all things
In this context, it should be remembered that the disvalue of any given risk is a function of its
likelihood as well as its magnitude, which is in turn affected by which alternative courses of
action are available.49 While the most common surgical risks associated with circumcision, such
as pain, bleeding, or infection may be considered tolerable when a surgery is medically
necessary, their disvalue to an individual is much greater when he is healthy and does not
require surgery.50 In addition, while other risks associated with circumcision may be less
common, they may also be extremely serious—as in the case of death—and must therefore be
weighted more heavily in assessments of the value or disvalue of performing the surgery.51
An abstract based on these data was presented at the 2017 National Congress of the American
Academy of Pediatrics in Chicago, IL.52 We thank Professor Dominic Wilkinson of the University
of Oxford for valuable feedback on an earlier draft of this manuscript.
Author contributions
BDE drafted the Introduction and Discussion sections as well as revised the entire manuscript.
VA and VA carried out and reported all data analyses and revised the entire manuscript. ATR
drafted the Methods and Results sections and revised the entire manuscript.
1. Cold CJ, Taylor JR. The prepuce. BJU Int. 1999;83(S1):3444.
2. Taylor JR, Lockwood AP, Taylor AJ. The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision.
Br J Urol. 1996;77(2):291295.
3. Rickwood AMK. Medical indications for circumcision. BJU Int. 1999;83(S1):45-51. doi:10.1046/j.1464-
4. Sneppen I, Thorup J. Foreskin morbidity in uncircumcised males. Pediatrics. 2016;137(5):e20154340.
5. UNAIDS. Neonatal and child male circumcision: a global review. Jt U N Program HIVAIDS. 2010:1-103.
6. AAP. Male circumcision (technical report). Pediatrics. 2012;130(3):e756-e785. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-1990
7. Maeda JL, Chari R, Elixhauser A. Circumcisions Performed in U.S. Community Hospitals, 2009. Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012.
8. Witt WP, Weiss AJ, Elixhauser A. Overview of hospital stays for children in the United States, 2012. Healthc
Cost Util Proj. 2006;statistical brief #187:1-17.
9. Morris BJ, Wamai RG, Henebeng EB, et al. Estimation of country-specific and global prevalence of male
circumcision. Popul Health Metr. 2016;14(4):1-13. doi:10.1186/s12963-016-0073-5
10. Wallerstein EJ. Circumcision: the uniquely American medical enigma. Urol Clin North Am. 1985;12(1):123-
11. Frisch M, Simonsen J. Cultural background, non-therapeutic circumcision and the risk of meatal stenosis and
other urethral stricture disease: Two nationwide register-based cohort studies in Denmark 19772013. The
Surgeon. 2016:in press. doi:10.1016/j.surge.2016.11.002
12. Krill AJ, Palmer LS, Palmer JS. Complications of circumcision. Sci World J. 2011;11:2458-2468.
13. Lau G, Kim J, Schaeffer A. Identification of circumcision complications using a regional claims database. In:
The Societies for Pediatric Urology. San Francisco; 2018.
14. Hutcheson JC. Male neonatal circumcision: indications, controversies and complications. Urol Clin.
2004;31(3):461-467. doi:10.1016/j.ucl.2004.04.011
15. NIS. Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). 2001 - 2010. Agency
Healthc Res Qual Rockv MD. 2018. Accessed March 6, 2018.
16. HHS. HCUPnet - national statistics on all hospital stays. Agency Healthc Res Qual - US Dep Health Hum Serv.
2018. Accessed March 6, 2018.
17. NIS. Publication Search Engine: Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project
(HCUP). Agency Healthc Res Qual Rockv MD. 2018. https://www.hcup- Accessed March 4, 2018.
18. CDC. Classification of diseases, functioning, and disability. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth
Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). US Cent Dis Control Prev. 2015. Accessed March 4, 2018.
19. Morris BJ, Bailis SA, Wiswell TE. Circumcision rates in the United States: rising or falling? What effect might
the new affirmative pediatric policy statement have? Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89(5):677-686.
20. Jenkins I. Bias and male circumcision. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89(11):1588. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.09.001
21. Darby R. To avoid circumcision complications, avoid circumcision. Can Urol Assoc J. 2014;8(7-8):231.
22. Speert H. Circumcision of the newborn: an appraisal of its present status. Obstet Gynecol. 1953;2(2):164-172.
23. King LR. Neonatal circumcision in the United States in 1982. J Urol. 1982;128(1):1135-1136.
24. Wiswell TE, Geschke DW. Risks from circumcision during the first month of life compared with those for
uncircumcised boys. Pediatrics. 1989;83(6):1011-1015.
25. Bollinger D. Lost boys: an estimate of U.S. circumcision-related infant deaths. Thymos J Boyhood Stud.
2010;4(1):78-90. doi:10.3149/thy.0401.78
26. Morris BJ, Tobian AAR, Hankins CA, et al. Veracity and rhetoric in paediatric medicine: a critique of Svoboda
and Van Howe’s response to the AAP policy on infant male circumcision. J Med Ethics. 2014;40(7):463-470.
27. Svoboda JS, Adler PW, Van Howe RS. Circumcision is unethical and unlawful. J Law Med Ethics.
2016;44(2):263-282. doi:10.1177/1073110516654120
28. Cunniff C, Carmack JL, Kirby RS, Fiser DH. Contribution of heritable disorders to mortality in the pediatric
intensive care unit. Pediatrics. 1995;95(5):678-681.
29. Frisch M, Earp BD. Circumcision of male infants and children as a public health measure in developed
countries: a critical assessment of recent evidence. Glob Public Health. in press.
30. Cleary TG, Kohl S. Overwhelming infection with group B beta-hemolytic streptococcus associated with
circumcision. Pediatrics. 1979;64(3):301-303.
31. Earp BD, Shaw DM. Cultural bias in American medicine: the case of infant male circumcision. J Pediatr Ethics.
32. Fitzgerald M, Walker SM. Infant pain management: a developmental neurobiological approach. Nat Clin
Pract Neurol. 2009;5(1):35-50. doi:10.1038/ncpneuro0984
33. Earp BD, Darby R. Circumcision, sexual experience, and harm. Univ Pa J Int Law. 2017;37(2-online):1-57.
34. Fagen CR. Tot’s shock hosp death. New York Post.
Published May 5, 2011.
35. Newell TEC (Coroner). Judgment of Inquiry into the Death of McWillis, Ryleigh Roman Bryan. Province of
British Columbia - Office of the Chief Coroner; 2002.
36. Rachter P. Grand jury to probe death of baby after circumcision. The Des Moines Register. Published November 20, 1982.
37. Scurlock JM, Pemberton PJ. Neonatal meningitis and circumcision. Med J Aust. 1977;1(10):332-334.
38. Vogel-Hockley S. Death of local baby subject of investigation. The Penticton Western. Published August 31, 2002.
39. Curtis P. Police probe death of baby after circumcision. The Guardian. Published February 17, 2007. Accessed
March 6, 2018.
40. Hiss J, Horowitz A, Kahana T. Fatal haemorrhage following male ritual circumcision. J Clin Forensic Med.
2000;7(1):32-34. doi:10.1054/jcfm.1999.0340
41. Offit PA. Ban the ritual that can kill Jewish newborns. The Daily Beast. Published
April 22, 2017. Accessed July 22, 2017.
42. Robbins L. Infant’s death renews debate over ritual circumcision. The New York Times.
ritual.html. Published March 7, 2012. Accessed March 6, 2018.
43. Edler G, Axelsson I, Barker GM, Lie S, Naumburg E. Serious complications in male infant circumcisions in
Scandinavia indicate that this always be performed as a hospital-based procedure. Acta Paediatr.
2016;105(7):842-850. doi:10.1111/apa.13402
44. Sauer LW. Fatal staphylococcus bronchopneumonia following ritual circumcision. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1943;46(4):583. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(15)30033-8
45. Frisch M, Simonsen J. Ritual circumcision and risk of autism spectrum disorder in 0- to 9-year-old boys:
national cohort study in Denmark. J R Soc Med. 2015;108(7):266-279. doi:10.1177/0141076814565942
46. Macke JK. Analgesia for circumcision: effects on newborn behavior and mother/infant interaction. J Obstet
Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2001;30(5):507-514. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2001.tb01570.x
47. Taddio A, Katz J. The effects of early pain experience in neonates on pain responses in infancy and childhood.
Pediatr Drugs. 2005;7(4):245-257. doi:10.2165/00148581-200507040-00004
48. AAP. Prevention and management of procedural pain in the neonate: an update. Pediatrics.
2016;137(2):e20154271. doi:10.1542/peds.2015-4271
49. Allhoff F. Risk, precaution, and emerging technologies. Stud Ethics Law Technol. 2009;3(1):1-27.
50. Hutson JM. Circumcision: a surgeon’s perspective. J Med Ethics. 2004;30(3):238-240.
51. Fox M, Thomson M. Short changed? The law and ethics of male circumcision. Int J Child Rights.
52. Earp BD, Allareddy V, Allareddy V, Rotta AT. Factors associated with early deaths following neonatal
circumcision. Pediatrics. 2018;42(1-meeting abstracts):224-224.
Table 1. Annual distribution of early deaths following neonatal circumcision
DS = Discharge information suppressed due to low cell count (as per data user agreement with AHRQ)
Table 2. Insurance status and demographic information
DS = Discharge information suppressed due to low cell count (as per data user agreement with AHRQ)
Year of
n= 200
n= 9,832,910
938,253 (9.5%)
28 (14%)
991,608 (10%)
952,707 (9.6%)
33 (16.5%)
962,683 (9.7%)
21 (10.5%)
987,666 (10%)
20 (10%)
997,218 (10.1%)
26 (13%)
1,031,720 (10.4%)
15 (7.5%)
1,012,361 (10.2%)
15 (7.5%
973,589 (9.9%)
36 (18%)
985,105 (10%)
n= 200
n= 9,832,910
96 (48%)
4,450,060 (45.3%)
30 (15%)
1,049,500 (10.7%)
408,820 (4.2%)
Asian/Pacific Islander
274,481 (2.8%)
Native Americans
46,288 (0.5%)
Other Races
293,779 (3%)
Missing race information
50 (25%)
3,309,982 (33.7%)
19,635 (0.2%)
80 (40%)
3,112,608 (31.7%)
104 (52%)
6,031,235 (61.3%)
369,369 (3.8%)
Other insurance
279,114 (2.8%)
Missing insurance information
20,949 (0.2%)
Table 3. Hospital characteristics
Table 4. Co-morbid condition and odds of death following circumcision
DS = Discharge information suppressed due to low cell count (as per data user agreement with AHRQ)
n= 200
n= 9,832,910
Bed size
30 (15%)
1,139,914 (11.6%)
50 (25%)
2,512,696 (25.6%)
120 (60%)
6,131,148 (62.4%)
49,152 (0.5%)
Hospital region
26 (13%)
1,972,353 (20.1%)
66 (33%)
3,551,793 (36.1%)
67 (33.5%)
2,842,030 (28.9%)
40 (20%)
1,466,734 (14.9%)
Hospital teaching
40 (20%)
4,903,235 (49.9%)
160 (80%)
4,880,522 (49.6%)
49,153 (0.5%)
n= 200
n= 9,832,910
Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Cardiovascular disease
16 (8%)
8,304 (0.084%)
102.9 (61.7 171.5)
16 (8%)
5,355 (0.054%)
159.6 (95.6 266.2)
Fluid and electrolyte
47 (23.5%)
44,090 (0.448%)
68.2 (49.1 94.6)
Pulmonary circulatory
1,487 (0.015%)
169.5 (69.7 412.5)
Neurological disorders
2,257 (0.023%)
111.7 (45.9 271.6)
... In technical errors, there may be injury to penile tissues like glans injury, urethral injury or partial or complete penile amputation [3]. Non-technical factors may involve diseases involving defect in blood coagulation or bleeding diathesis or other comorbids [4]. In Pakistan, where majority of circumcisions are being done by non-medical personnel, it is expected that both of above factors contribute to post circumcision bleeding imposing health costs secondary to preventable issues. ...
Full-text available
Objective: To determine the frequency of post-circumcision bleeding and its outcome in terms of need of admission, blood and blood product transfusions and surgical procedure to secure hemostasis in children presenting to NICH. Materials and Methods: It was a cross sectional descriptive study conducted at NICH for 1-year duration. A total of 126 patients of post circumcision bleeding were included. Results: The study was done from 2-12-2013 to 4-12-2014 for duration of 1 year and 2 days. Age and weight were stratified according to mean. All patients presenting with injury to penile tissues leading to bleeding were included. 29 (23%) patients needed admission and blood transfusion. Statistically significant association found between need for admission and person or/and method of circumcision. Most severe injuries were caused by paramedic and nonmedical persons. Conclusion: Circumcision is a minor procedure when done by experienced and trained circumciser. There is need to raise awareness that it is more of a surgical procedure than just a ritual. Education of parents is needed in conjunction with training of the circumciser to prevent life threatening complications.
Full-text available
The World Health Organization (WHO) condemns all medically unnecessary female genital cutting (FGC) that is primarily associated with people of color and the Global South, claiming that such FGC violates the human right to bodily integrity regardless of harm-level, degree of medicalization, or consent. However, the WHO does not condemn medically unnecessary FGC that is primarily associated with Western culture, such as elective labiaplasty or genital piercing, even when performed by non-medical practitioners (e.g., body artists) or on adolescent girls. Nor does it campaign against any form of medically unnecessary intersex genital cutting (IGC) or male genital cutting (MGC), including forms that are non-consensual or comparably harmful to some types of FGC. These and other apparent inconsistencies risk undermining the perceived authority of the WHO to pronounce on human rights. This paper considers whether the WHO could justify its selective condemnation of non-Western-associated FGC by appealing to the distinctive role of such practices in upholding patriarchal gender systems and furthering sex-based discrimination against women and girls. The paper argues that such a justification would not succeed. To the contrary, dismantling patriarchal power structures and reducing sex-based discrimination in FGC-practicing societies requires principled opposition to medically unnecessary, non-consensual genital cutting of all vulnerable persons, including insufficiently autonomous children, irrespective of their sex traits or socially assigned gender. This conclusion is based, in part, on an assessment of the overlapping and often mutually reinforcing roles of different types of child genital cutting—FGC, MGC, and IGC—in reproducing oppressive gender systems. These systems, in turn, tend to subordinate women and girls as well as non-dominant males and sexual and gender minorities. The selective efforts of the WHO to eliminate only non-Western-associated FGC exposes the organization to credible accusations of racism and cultural imperialism and paradoxically undermines its own stated goals: namely, securing the long-term interests and equal rights of women and girls in FGC-practicing societies.
Full-text available
The word "circumcision" comes from Latin circum (meaning "around") and caedere (meaning "to cut"). Cultural and religious justifications are employed to convince members of the community as well as outsiders that circumcision is reasonable and just. The purpose of the discussion is to suggest some cardinal changes to the practice of male circumcision in order to make it more humane and less painful to its subjects. Balancing between group rights and the rights of the child, it is essential to avoid unnecessary suffering. It is one of the liberal state's obligations to protect the best interests of vulnerable third parties. The article opens with some preliminary data about male circumcision and then explains its importance in Judaism. It examines the medical reasons for male circumcision and the risks involved in the practice; subsequently, it discusses the critique of male circumcision. The article also highlights the points of agreement and disagreement between those supporting and opposing the ritual and insists that male circumcision should be performed by using anaesthesia. The final part of the article includes a proposal for humane male circumcision that considers religious sentiments and the rights of the child, aiming to strike a reasonable balance between competing interests. I hope the proposal will be debated in parliaments in the western world. If we are to achieve a richer culture, rich in contrasting values, we must recognize the whole gamut of human potentialities, and so weave a less arbitrary social fabric, one in which each diverse gift will find a fitting place.
Full-text available
Objective: To systematically evaluate evidence against male circumcision (MC). Methods: We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. Results: Database searches retrieved 297 publications for inclusion. Bibliographies of these yielded 101 more. After evaluation we found: Claims that MC carries high risk were contradicted by low frequency of adverse events that were virtually all minor and easily treated with complete resolution. Claims that MC causes psychological harm were contradicted by studies finding no such harm. Claims that MC impairs sexual function and pleasure were contradicted by high-quality studies finding no adverse effect. Claims disputing the medical benefits of MC were contradicted by a large body of high-quality evidence indicating protection against a wide range of infections, dermatological conditions, and genital cancers in males and the female sexual partners of men. Risk-benefit analyses reported that benefits exceed risks by 100-200 to 1. To maximize benefits and minimize risks, the evidence supported early infant MC rather than arguments that the procedure should be delayed until males are old enough to decide for themselves. Claims that MC of minors is unethical were contradicted by balanced evaluations of ethical issues supporting the rights of children to be provided with low-risk, high-benefit interventions such as MC for better health. Expert evaluations of case-law supported the legality of MC of minors. Other data demonstrated that early infant MC is cost-saving to health systems. Conclusions: Arguments opposing MC are supported mostly by low-quality evidence and opinion, and are contradicted by strong scientific evidence.
Full-text available
Cambridge Core - Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine - Female Genital Cosmetic Surgery - edited by Sarah M. Creighton Link:
Full-text available
Female Genital Cosmetic Surgery - edited by Sarah M. Creighton February 2019
Full-text available
Background Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is the most common cause of postneonatal unexplained infant death. The allostatic load hypothesis posits that SIDS is the result of cumulative perinatal painful, stressful, or traumatic exposures that tax neonatal regulatory systems. Aims To test the predictions of the allostatic load hypothesis we explored the relationships between SIDS and two common phenotypes, male neonatal circumcision (MNC) and prematurity. Methods We collated latitudinal data from 15 countries and 40 US states sampled during 2009 and 2013. We used linear regression analyses and likelihood ratio tests to calculate the association between SIDS and the phenotypes. Results SIDS mortality rate was significantly and positively correlated with MNC. Globally (weighted): Increase of 0.06 (95% CI: 0.01-0.1, t = 2.86, p = 0.01) per 1000 SIDS mortality per 10% increase in circumcision rate. US (weighted): Increase of 0.1 (95% CI: 0.03-0.16, t = 2.81, p = 0.01) per 1000 unexplained mortality per 10% increase in circumcision rate. US states in which Medicaid covers MNC had significantly higher MNC rates (χ̄ = 0.72 vs 0.49, p = 0.007) and male/female ratio of SIDS deaths (χ̄ = 1.48 vs 1.125, p = 0.015) than other US states. Prematurity was also significantly and positively correlated with MNC. Globally: Increase of 0.5 (weighted: 95% CI: 0.02-0.086, t = 3.37, p = 0.004) per 1000 SIDS mortality per 10% increase in the prematurity rates. US: Increase of 1.9 (weighted: 95% CI: 0.06-0.32, t = 3.13, p = 0.004) per 1000 unexplained mortalities per 10% increase in the prematurity rates. Combined, the phenotypes increased the likelihood of SIDS. Conclusions Epidemiological analyses are useful to generate hypotheses but cannot provide strong evidence of causality. Biological plausibility is provided by a growing body of experimental and clinical evidence linking aversive preterm and early-life SIDS events. Together with historical and anthropological evidence, our findings emphasize the necessity of cohort studies that consider these phenotypes with the aim of improving the identification of at-risk infants and reducing infant mortality. Relevance for patients Preterm birth and neonatal circumcision are associated with a greater risk of SIDS, and efforts should be focused on reducing their rates.
Full-text available
Critics of non-therapeutic male and female childhood genital cutting claim that such cutting is harmful. It is therefore puzzling that ‘circumcised’ women and men do not typically regard themselves as having been harmed by the cutting, notwithstanding the loss of sensitive, prima facie valuable tissue. For female genital cutting (FGC), a commonly proposed solution to this puzzle is that women who had part(s) of their vulvae removed before sexual debut ‘do not know what they are missing’ and may ‘justify’ their genitally altered state by adopting false beliefs about the benefits of FGC, while simultaneously stigmatising unmodified genitalia as unattractive or unclean. Might a similar phenomenon apply to neonatally circumcised men? In this survey of 999 US American men, we find that greater endorsement of false beliefs concerning circumcision and penile anatomy predicts greater satisfaction with being circumcised, while among genitally intact men, a trend in the opposite direction occurs: greater endorsement of false beliefs predicts less satisfaction with being genitally intact. These findings provide tentative support for the hypothesis that the lack of harm reported by many circumcised men, like the lack of harm reported by their female counterparts in societies that practice FGC, may be related to holding inaccurate beliefs concerning unaltered genitalia and the consequences of childhood genital modification.
Full-text available
In 2012 the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) released a policy statement and technical report stating that the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks. In response, a group of mostly European doctors suggested that this conclusion may have been due to cultural bias among the AAP Task Force on Circumcision, since their conclusion differed from that of international peer organizations despite relying on a similar evidence base. In this article, we evaluate the charge of cultural bias as well as the response to it by the AAP Task Force. Along the way, we discuss ongoing disagreements about the ethical status of nontherapeutic infant male circumcision, and draw some more general lessons about the problem of cultural bias in medicine.
Full-text available
Surgically modifying the genitals of children—female, male, and intersex—has drawn increased scrutiny in recent years. In Western societies, it is illegal to modify the healthy genitals of female children in any way or to any extent in the absence of a strict medical indication. By contrast, modifying the healthy genitals of male children and intersex children is currently permitted. In this journal in 2015, Stephen R. Munzer discussed a controversial German court case from 2012 (and its aftermath) that called into question the legal status of nontherapeutic male circumcision (NTC), particularly as it is carried out in infancy or early childhood. Whether NTC is legal before an age of consent depends partly upon abstract principles relating to the best interpretation of the relevant laws, and partly upon empirical and conceptual questions concerning the degree to which, and ways in which, such circumcision can reasonably be understood as a harm. In this article, we explore some of these latter questions in light of Professor Munzer’s analysis, paying special attention to the subjective, personal, and individually and culturally variable dimensions of judgments about benefit versus harm. We also highlight some of the inconsistencies in the current legal treatment of male versus female forms of nontherapeutic childhood genital alteration, and suggest that problematically gendered assumptions about the sexual body may play a role in bringing about and sustaining such inconsistencies.
Full-text available
Background: Meatal stenosis is markedly more common in circumcised than genitally intact males, affecting 5-20 per cent of circumcised boys. However, no population-based study has estimated the relative risk of meatal stenosis and other urethral stricture diseases (USDs) or the population attributable fraction (AFp) associated with non-therapeutic circumcision. Methods: In two nationwide cohort studies (comprising 4.0 million males of all ages and 810 719 non-Muslim males aged 0-36 years, respectively), we compared hospital contact rates for USD during 1977-2013 between circumcised and intact Danish males. Hazard ratios (HRs) were obtained using Cox proportional hazards regression, and the AFp estimated the proportion of USD cases in <10 year-old boys that is due to non-therapeutic circumcision. Results: Muslim males had higher rates of meatal stenosis than ethnic Danish males, particularly in <10 year-old boys (HR 3.44, 95 per cent confidence interval 2.42-4.88). HRs linking circumcision to meatal stenosis (10.3, 4.53-23.4) or other USDs (5.14, 3.48-7.60) were high, and attempts to reduce potential misclassification and confounding further strengthened the association, particularly in <10 year-old boys (meatal stenosis: 26.3, 9.37-73.9; other USDs: 14.0, 6.86-28.6). Conservative calculations revealed that at least 18, 41, 78, and 81 per cent of USD cases in <10 year-old boys from countries with circumcision prevalences as in Denmark, the United Kingdom, the United States and Israel, respectively, may be attributable to non-therapeutic circumcision. Conclusion: Our study provides population-based epidemiological evidence that circumcision removes the natural protection against meatal stenosis and, possibly, other USDs as well.
Full-text available
In December of 2014, an anonymous working group under the United States’ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a draft of the first-ever federal recommendations regarding male circumcision. In accordance with the American Academy of Pediatrics’ circumcision policy from 2012 - but in contrast to the more recent 2015 policy from the Canadian Paediatric Society as well as prior policies (still in force) from medical associations in Europe and Australasia - the CDC suggested that the benefits of the surgery outweigh the risks. In this article, we provide a brief scientific and conceptual analysis of the CDC’s assessment of benefit vs. risk, and argue that it deserves a closer look. Although we set aside the burgeoning bioethical debate surrounding the moral permissibility of performing non-therapeutic circumcisions on healthy minors, we argue that, from a scientific and medical perspective, current evidence suggests that such circumcision is not an appropriate public health measure for developed countries such as the United States.
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) is the most common cause of postneonatal infant death. The allostatic load hypothesis posits that SIDS is the result of perinatal cumulative painful, stressful, or traumatic exposures that tax neonatal regulatory systems. To test it, we explored the relationships between SIDS and two common stressors, male neonatal circumcision (MNC) and prematurity, using latitudinal data from 15 countries and over 40 US states during the years 1999-2016. We used linear regression analyses and likelihood ratio tests to calculate the association between SIDS and the stressors. SIDS prevalence was significantly and positively correlated with MNC and prematurity rates. MNC explained 14.2% of the variability of SIDS's male bias in the US, reminiscent of the Jewish myth of Lilith, the killer of infant males. Combined, the stressors increased the likelihood of SIDS. Ecological analyses are useful to generate hypotheses but cannot provide strong evidence of causality. Biological plausibility is provided by a growing body of experimental and clinical evidence linking adversary preterm and early-life events with SIDS. Together with historical evidence, our findings emphasize the necessity of cohort studies that consider these environmental stressors with the aim of improving the identification of at-risk infants and reducing infant mortality.
The foreskin is a complex structure that protects and moisturizes the head of the penis, and, being the most densely innervated and sensitive portion of the penis, is essential to providing the complete sexual response. Circumcision—the removal of this structure—is non-therapeutic, painful, irreversible surgery that also risks serious physical injury, psychological sequelae, and death. Men rarely volunteer for it, and increasingly circumcised men are expressing their resentment about it. Circumcision is usually performed for religious, cultural and personal reasons. Early claims about its medical benefits have been proven false. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the Centers for Disease Prevention and Control have made many scientifically untenable claims promoting circumcision that run counter to the consensus of Western medical organizations. Circumcision violates the cardinal principles of medical ethics, to respect autonomy (self-determination), to do good, to do no harm, and to be just. Without a clear medical indication, circumcision must be deferred until the child can provide his own fully informed consent. In 2012, a German court held that circumcision constitutes criminal assault. Under existing United States law and international human rights declarations as well, circumcision already violates boys› absolute rights to equal protection, bodily integrity, autonomy, and freedom to choose their own religion. A physician has a legal duty to protect children from unnecessary interventions. Physicians who obtain parental permission through spurious claims or omissions, or rely on the American Academy of Pediatrics' position, also risk liability for misleading parents about circumcision.
Objective: As a consequence of the discussion on whether the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks and the discrepancies in reported figures of complications, we evaluated the incidence and morbidity of foreskin surgery due to medical indications in boys from the Capital Region of Denmark in 2014. Methods: Medical records from all boys operated on the foreskin due to medical reasons in the Capital Region in 2014 were reviewed. Patients with hypospadias, ritual circumcision, and redo-surgery because of complications to nontherapeutic circumcision were excluded. Results: A total of 181 patients were included. The cumulative risk of undergoing foreskin operation before 18 years of age was 1.7%. Forty patients had histologic verified balanitis xerotica obliterans (BXO) corresponding to a total risk of 0.37% of developing BXO. Mean age at surgery was 10.1 years (range 1-17). Phimosis was the most frequently reported indication (95.0%). The remaining 5.0% underwent surgery because of frenulum breve causing problems during erection. Before surgery, 27.1% had foreskin-related voiding problems and 17.1% had at least 1 episode of balanitis. Circumcision was initially performed in 44 cases. The remaining 137 patients had a foreskin-preserving operation performed. Nine boys had secondary circumcision after initially having foreskin-preserving operation. Fifty patients initially had preputial histology performed. BXO was verified in 37 patients. Of the 9 patients with redo-surgery due to recurrent phimosis, a further 3 had histologically verified BXO. Conclusions: Childhood foreskin-related problems in a region with no tradition of newborn male circumcision should not be neglected.
Aim: More than 7,000 male circumcisions are performed in Scandinavia every year. Circumcision is regulated in different ways in Sweden and Denmark and Norway. This study reviewed and described factors associated with complications of circumcision in infant boys in Scandinavia over the last two decades and discussed how these complications could be avoided. Methods: Data on significant complications following circumcision on boys under the age of one in Scandinavia over the last 20 years was collected. Information was retrieved from testimonies of circumcisers, witnesses, medical records and verdicts. A systematic review was performed of fatal cases in the literature. Results: We found that 32 cases had been reported to the health authorities in the three countries and we identified a total of 74 complications in these cases. These included four boys with severe bleeding and circulatory shock, which ended in the death of one boy. Other less serious complications may have occurred in other boys, but not been reported. Conclusion: Complications following male circumcision in Scandinavia were relatively rare, but serious complications did occur. Based on the analyses of the severe cases, we argue that circumcision should only be performed at hospitals with 24-hour emergency departments. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
The prevention of pain in neonates should be the goal of all pediatricians and health care professionals who work with neonates, not only because it is ethical but also because repeated painful exposures have the potential for deleterious consequences. Neonates at greatest risk of neurodevelopmental impairment as a result of preterm birth (ie, the smallest and sickest) are also those most likely to be exposed to the greatest number of painful stimuli in the NICU. Although there are major gaps in knowledge regarding the most effective way to prevent and relieve pain in neonates, proven and safe therapies are currently underused for routine minor, yet painful procedures. Therefore, every health care facility caring for neonates should implement (1) a pain-prevention program that includes strategies for minimizing the number of painful procedures performed and (2) a pain assessment and management plan that includes routine assessment of pain, pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies for the prevention of pain associated with routine minor procedures, and measures for minimizing pain associated with surgery and other major procedures.