ArticlePublisher preview available

Brief Report: A Survey of Autism Research Priorities Across a Diverse Community of Stakeholders

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

Inclusion of stakeholder voices in the allocation of research funding can increase the relevance of results and improve community engagement in research. We describe the results of an online survey that gathered input from community stakeholders regarding autism research priorities. A demographically diverse sample of respondents (N = 6004; 79.1% female; 72.5% ages 30–59; 86.4% USA) completed the survey. Results indicated a preference for applied relative to basic science topics, though both basic and applied science areas were rated as important. Respondents gave their highest ratings to research focused on co-occurring conditions, health and well-being, adult transition, and lifespan issues. These results can guide decision-making by public and private funders when developing science funding priorities and engaging in science dissemination activities.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
1 3
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (2018) 48:3965–3971
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3642-6
BRIEF REPORT
Brief Report: ASurvey ofAutism Research Priorities Across aDiverse
Community ofStakeholders
ThomasW.Frazier1· GeraldineDawson2· DonnaMurray1· AndyShih3· JessicaSnyderSachs4· AngelaGeiger4
Published online: 15 June 2018
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018
Abstract
Inclusion of stakeholder voices in the allocation of research funding can increase the relevance of results and improve com-
munity engagement in research. We describe the results of an online survey that gathered input from community stakeholders
regarding autism research priorities. A demographically diverse sample of respondents (N = 6004; 79.1% female; 72.5% ages
30–59; 86.4% USA) completed the survey. Results indicated a preference for applied relative to basic science topics, though
both basic and applied science areas were rated as important. Respondents gave their highest ratings to research focused on
co-occurring conditions, health and well-being, adult transition, and lifespan issues. These results can guide decision-making
by public and private funders when developing science funding priorities and engaging in science dissemination activities.
Keywords Autism· Research priorities· Caregivers· Funding· Stakeholders· Adult transition
Introduction
Over the last two decades, research has identified and
begun to explain the etiologic and phenotypic heteroge-
neity of autism (de la Torre-Ubieta etal. 2016; Georgia-
des etal. 2014). Increases in public and private/non-profit
research funding have been an important part of promot-
ing autism research advances. From 2008 to 2015, autism
research funding in the US (public and private) expanded
from $222million to $343million, with projected increases
to $496million by 2020 (source: NIH Reporter) (National
Institutes of Health 2017). Expanded funding has paralleled
increases in the number of autism publications, from < 500
in 2000 to > 3500 in 2015 (source: US National Library of
Medicine PubMed database search) (Ncbi Resource Coor-
dinators 2017). Similarly, the number of patent applications
relevant to autism increased from 4 in 2001 to almost 60
in 2014 (source: US Patent and Trademark Office AppFT)
(US Patent and Trademark Office 2017). While not every
research area has received strong funding, investigations
have proceeded on a wide front, with topics ranging from
genetics and basic neuroscience to cognition and behavior
to clinical trials and quality of life. As the cohorts of young
children diagnosed during the expansion of autism aware-
ness have progressed to adolescence and early adulthood,
research into understudied topics such as adult transition has
also increased. However, absolute funding levels for services
and lifespan research—areas important to the quality of life
of many individuals and families—lag behind (Interagency
Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC) October 2017).
Understanding the wide range of needs and desires of
people that are directly affected by autism, including per-
sons on the spectrum and families, as well as providers
(clinicians and educators) and researchers, is important in
setting priorities regarding autism research funding. (Pel-
licano etal. 2014a, b). Including viewpoints of those with
autism and their families as well as those who work directly
with persons on the spectrum, such as therapists and teach-
ers, in decision-making can increase the benefits that future
research delivers to individuals and families, iteratively
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this
article (https ://doi.org/10.1007/s1080 3-018-3642-6) contains
supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
* Thomas W. Frazier
thomas.frazier@autismspeaks.org
1 Science Department, Autism Speaks, 1 East 33rd Street 4th
Floor, NewYork, NY10016, USA
2 Department ofPsychiatry andBehavioral Sciences, Duke
University, Durham, NC, USA
3 Global Autism Public Health, Autism Speaks, NewYork,
USA
4 Autism Speaks, NewYork, USA
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... Our qualitative approach based on focus group discussions also has inherent limitations. Its small sample size may not fully represent the wider autistic community's diversity [40]. The dynamics of focus groups can introduce conformity biases. ...
... One example is autistic people's deep enjoyment of and reliance upon "samefoods", that is, personalized subsets of foods often serving as the core of an autistic person's diet, that can offer comfort or delight, particularly due to their dependable taste, smell, temperature, or texture [72][73][74][75][76]. In terms of trial design, autistic stakeholders can offer insight as to whether prospective food changes (and their resulting sensory changes) truly hold a high enough value to autistic people themselves to merit a dramatic dietary shift [77][78][79], or whether nutritional supplement formats (pills, powders, drops) would be preferable to changes to preferred routine dietary intakes. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) commonly experience sensory processing that differs from general-population norms, and the autistic lived experience of eating includes preferences for routine, and sensory processing difficulty related to scents, tastes, temperatures, and textures of food. Meanwhile, research indicates that nutrients involved in one-carbon metabolism (OCM) may be related to sensory processing. Methods: This study enrolled 33 school-aged children with autism to assess whether OCM nutrient intake is associated with sensory processing. Parents completed two parent-report assessments: the youth and adult food frequency questionnaire (YAFFQ), and a sensory processing tool, Sensory Profile 2 (SP2). Results: Participant data showed generally good nutritional profiles mirroring those of general-population U.S. children. A group-binarized linear regression model showed the following relationships (p < 0.05): vitamin B12 consumption had a negative association with the SP2 Oral and Sensor domain scores. Choline intake had a positive association with the SP2 Avoider domain score. Vitamin B1 showed a positive association with the SP2 Visual domain score. Conclusions: These results support the possible existence of a relationship between sensory symptoms and OCM nutrient consumption levels in school-aged children diagnosed with autism. Future research is needed to confirm and explore the potential for causality.
... Given the great degree of coincidence between cilia-related disorders and autism, including congenital heart disease, hydrocephalus, asthma, and blindness (Sigmon et al. 2019;Rosenthal et al. 2021; Al-Beltagi 2021; A. J. Duy et al. 2022;Jin et al. 2017;Pili et al. 2021), these findings suggest that the role of cilia should be considered further in autism and in commonly co-occurring and oft-disabling medical conditions like epilepsy, gastrointestinal disorders, congenital heart disease, respiratory issues, sleep disorders, and sensory sensitivities (Al-Beltagi 2021; Danesh et al. 2021). Indeed, a survey of autistic individuals and their family members revealed that understanding commonly co-occurring conditions is of highest importance to autistic people (Frazier et al. 2018). ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Hundreds of high confidence autism genes have been identified, yet the relevant etiological mechanisms remain unclear. Gene ontology analyses have repeatedly identified enrichment of proteins with annotated functions in gene expression regulation and neuronal communication. However, proteins are often pleiotropic and these annotations are inherently incomplete. Our recent autism functional genetics work has suggested that these genes may share a common mechanism at the cilium, a membrane-bound organelle critical for neurogenesis, brain patterning, and neuronal activity–all processes strongly implicated in autism. Moreover, autism commonly co-occurs with conditions that are known to involve ciliary-related pathologies, including congenital heart disease, hydrocephalus, and blindness. However, the role of autism genes at the cilium has not been systematically investigated. Here we demonstrate that autism proteins spanning disparate functional annotations converge in expression, localization, and function at cilia, and that patients with pathogenic variants in these genes have cilia-related co-occurring conditions and biomarkers of disrupted ciliary function. This degree of convergence among genes spanning diverse functional annotations strongly suggests that cilia are relevant to autism, as well as to commonly co-occurring conditions, and that this organelle should be explored further for therapeutic potential. One-Sentence Summary Autism genes of diverse functional annotations converge at cilia, deepening our understanding of underlying autism biology and co-occurring conditions.
... Adopting a co-designed approach to discovery research can inform allies of the autistic community on how to better support people with sensory processing differences who are not currently accommodated and enable autistic people to participate in the world in ways they prefer (Jagosh et al., 2015;Jaswal & Akhtar, 2019;Milton & Bracher, 2013). Furthermore, such research should address how we might maximize the autonomy of people with sensory processing differences and how certain sensory differences contribute positively to flourishing autistic lives (Frazier et al., 2018;Gillespie-Lynch, Kapp, Brooks, Pickens & Schwartzman, 2017;Pellicano et al., 2022). ...
Article
Full-text available
We need to combine sensory data from various sources to make sense of the world around us. This sensory data helps us understand our surroundings, influencing our experiences and interactions within our everyday environments. Recent interest in sensory‐focused approaches to supporting autistic people has fixed on auditory processing—the sense of hearing and the act of listening—and its crucial role in language, communications, and social domains, as well as non‐social autism‐specific attributes, to understand better how sensory processing might differ in autistic people. In this narrative review, we synthesize published research into auditory processing in autistic people and the relationship between auditory processing and autistic attributes in a contextually novel way. The purpose is to understand the relationship between these domains more fully, drawing on evidence gleaned from experiential perspectives through to neurological investigations. We also examine the relationship between auditory processing and diagnosable auditory conditions, such as hyperacusis, misophonia, phonophobia, and intolerance to loud sounds, as well as its relation to sleep, anxiety, and sensory overload. Through reviewing experiential, behavioral and neurological literature, we demonstrate that auditory processes interact with and shape the broader autistic profile—something not previously considered. Through a better understanding of the potential impact of auditory experiences, our review aims to inform future research on investigating the relationship between auditory processing and autistic traits through quantitative measures or using qualitative experiential inquiry to examine this relationship more holistically.
... Indeed, experimental animal models may be inappropriate for autism research. Such studies are a lower priority for many autistic community members (Frazier et al., 2018), perhaps in part because autism is a uniquely human condition characterized by complex social behaviors and differences in communication modalities (Kapp, 2019) that are not easily replicated in animals. Autism research studies commonly examine organisms (such as mice) whose social behavior is considerably more divergent from human social behavior (Bauman and Schumann, 2018;Watson and Platt, 2012). ...
Article
This perspective piece addresses critical challenges in oxytocin-based interventions for autism, drawing on neurodivergent perspectives to highlight key issues in research relevance and inclusivity. Although oxytocin has been posited to modulate social and routinized behaviors in autistic individuals, empirical findings on its efficacy remain inconsistent. We argue that these behavioral targets may reflect neurotypical biases, often disregarding autistic individuals' perspectives, thereby limiting intervention acceptability and efficacy. Past research has frequently excluded marginalized autistic populations, such as individuals with intellectual disabilities or gender-diverse identities, exacerbating generalizability issues. This piece advocates for a reorientation of research objectives in autism, proposing a shift from modifying core autistic behaviors towards enhancing quality of life through participatory research. By integrating autistic perspectives into study design and outcome selection, researchers can avoid deficit-oriented frameworks and instead prioritize socially valid outcomes, such as reducing anxiety and improving adaptive functioning. Further, the perspective piece critiques the reliance on animal models, which often lack translational validity due to autism's complex social and communicative dimensions. In closing, we underscore the importance of inclusive, reproducible autism research practices that align with the lived experiences and priorities of autistic individuals. Embracing participatory research, alongside rigorous methodological adjustments, can foster advancements that effectively support the well-being of the autistic community.
... Those new to undertaking autism research, and in particular non-autistic autism researchers, may find it more difficult to navigate the saturated and complicated landscape of autism organisations, advocates and individuals, all of whom purport to represent the shared and collective best interests of the autistic community. For postgraduate and early career autism researchers, peer-reviewed published papers about community priorities are one of the recommended starting points to understanding the potential benefit of a new project (Benevides et al., 2020;Frazier et al., 2018;Roche et al., 2021). Autism advocacy groups and their position statements may also provide guidance and direction in planning. ...
Chapter
Since the notion of ‘Research Paradigms’ was introduced by Kuhn in 1962, these theoretical and conceptual frameworks have guided how research is designed, implemented and shared. Autism research is fast-moving towards adopting increasingly participatory practices, which aim to place autistic people as a neurominority in a position of partnership with researchers. Although this shift is well-intentioned, autistic autism researchers increasingly recognise the limitations of current research paradigms, processes and practices in fulfilling autistic needs. Autistic autism researchers seeking to make a positive and meaningful contribution to the lives of autistic people face a myriad of well-ingrained organisational and societal challenges. Written by two autistic autism researchers, this chapter provides a comprehensive overview of their autistic approaches to autism research, built upon eight case studies conducted over seven years. Combining their professional and personal experiences as academics who were researchers prior to the discovery and disclosure of their autistic identities, they offer a way forward for experienced and novice autism researchers alike. Although their research qualifications were steeped in traditional non-autistic assumptions, powerful personal experiences of cognitive dissonance from reading peer-reviewed publications led by non-autistic autism researchers spurred the development and implementation of autistic approaches and methods in autism research.
... Similarly, feeding difficulties are also a prevalent issue in children diagnosed with autism. Behaviours such as refusal of solid food, chewing disorders, excessive food selection and, less commonly, overeating and eating inedible substances have been observed [1,4,18]. It has been demonstrated that additional psychiatric disorders are present in 40-70% of individuals diagnosed with autism. ...
Article
Full-text available
Autism is a developmental disorder with an early onset and lifelong duration that impairs social interaction and communication, with the condition being repeatedly diagnosed. To gain scientific knowledge about autism, one must observe these patients, perform a series of investigations and examinations, and finally obtain a general title. The first stage of getting to know children diagnosed with autism is one of the most important conditions for studying their psychology and inner world. Therefore, studying the psychology of children diagnosed with autism is also considered a responsible task for psychologists. The article presents the results of assessing the level of anxiety, stress, depression, attention and memory indicators in children with autism, which is an actual problem in recent times, in different age groups. The studies were conducted at two different locations: the Special Support, Special Training and Rehabilitation Centre (Tatvan district of Bitlis, Turkey) and the Psychological Centre Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Development Centre “PRIM” (Baku, Azerbaijan). Conducting studies in two different regions will reveal whether there is a difference between patients diagnosed with autism. The study examined children diagnosed with autism aged 6-12 years of both sexes (44 in Turkey; 51 in Azerbaijan). The results obtained in the study were compared with normal test limits. Psychological testing was conducted on an individual basis, and for the comprehensive study, the same child was tested repeatedly, with a certain frequency and with special attention. Although more boys than girls were included in the confirmed cases, since the aim was not to study gender differences, care was taken to obtain generalisable results. The attempt to clarify a complex topic such as stress in a broad topic such as autism characterises a very complex situation. Therefore, we have endeavoured to obtain more accurate results through the use of comprehensive tests. The main objective of the research work is to obtain certain results by using comprehensive psychological research methods in determining the level of stress and anxiety in children diagnosed with autism and to study the main characteristics of autism by comparing them with psychological indicators considered within the normal range. The results of studies conducted in Turkey and Azerbaijan showed the presence of low levels of attention and memory processes, behavioural disorders, aggressive and depressive behaviour in all age groups against the background of increased arousal. Children diagnosed with autism exhibit similar symptoms regardless of their geographical location, indicating that this disease has common characteristics regardless of national, racial, religious, and regional peculiarities.
... Autistic 1 advocates and their families prioritize research and clinical services focused on outcomes [3][4][5][6]. Prominent among these outcomes is quality of life (QoL), which the World Health Organization defines as "an individual's perception of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards, and concerns" [7]. Maximizing QoL among autistic individuals is often identified as a goal across a wide range of disciplines in autism research [8]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Quality of life (QoL) is identified as a clinical and research priority by the autistic community. Researchers have the responsibility to ensure that instruments used to measure QoL do so reliably and accurately among autistic participants. Methods Our study evaluated measurement invariance of Emotional Distress (Depression, Anxiety, Anger, Psychological Stress) and Subjective Well-Being (Life Satisfaction, Positive Affect, and Meaning & Purpose) scales of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) among groups of autistic (N=140, n per scale=132–140) and general population (N=1,224, n per scale=406–411) teenagers (14–17 years). These scales were included in the PROMIS Autism Battery-Lifespan, which uses PROMIS scales to measure QoL domains most relevant for autistic people. Results Multi-group confirmatory factor analyses using permutation tests demonstrated that Depression and Positive Affect scales exhibited scalar invariance between groups, indicating that scores can be meaningfully compared across autistic and general population teens. Anger and Psychological Stress scales demonstrated metric invariance between groups, indicating that these scales measure the same latent trait in both groups, but group comparisons are not supported. Conclusion We provide guidance as to how these scales can be used in psychometrically supported ways to capture constructs relevant for understanding QoL among autistic teens.
Chapter
Work aimed at characterizing the biological bases of autism has revealed a multiplicity of neural and genetic factors potentially associated with the condition. Combining information from multiple modalities and focusing on a specific, more homogenous subpopulation within the spectrum will help to parse this heterogeneity. In this chapter, we first briefly review major findings regarding the neural and genetic bases of autism broadly speaking, as well as a leading theory related to the etiology of autism, specifically in persons assigned female at birth (the “female protective effect” hypothesis). Thereafter, we discuss existing literature (N = 14 studies identified via systematic review) addressing the intersection of genetic and neural factors in the emergence and expression of autism in individuals assigned female at birth. These reports implicate sex differences in striatal, oxytocinergic, and neuroimmune systems, but further research in independent cohorts is needed to replicate and extend these findings. To conclude, we briefly review ethical considerations related to autism neurogenetic work, particularly concerns raised within the autism community, and provide recommendations for neurogenetic researchers.
Article
Full-text available
Engagement with stakeholders is an essential part of the research process. This is particularly the case for early autism research with infant cohorts and their families, where a range of ethical issues are pertinent. Here, we report on a large survey of parents who have a child on the autism spectrum (n = 1040) which specifically probed attitudes to early autism research. The large majority of parents showed positive attitudes overall, and these were associated with greater access to services, higher service quality ratings and higher rates of intellectual disability among their children. Parents valued the scientific goals of research, but half of parents also reported that an intervention component would be an essential prerequisite for them to participate in research. If enrolled in a study, parents were positive about most commonly used measures though less favourably disposed towards brain scans for children. They valued direct contact with the research team and openness in data sharing. We interpret our findings in terms of lessons for the early autism research community and for stakeholder engagement projects.
Article
Full-text available
The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) provides a large suite of online resources for biological information and data, including the GenBank® nucleic acid sequence database and the PubMed database of citations and abstracts for published life science journals. The Entrez system provides search and retrieval operations for most of these data from 37 distinct databases. The E-utilities serve as the programming interface for the Entrez system. Augmenting many of the Web applications are custom implementations of the BLAST program optimized to search specialized data sets. New resources released in the past year include iCn3D, MutaBind, and the Antimicrobial Resistance Gene Reference Database; and resources that were updated in the past year include My Bibliography, SciENcv, the Pathogen Detection Project, Assembly, Genome, the Genome Data Viewer, BLAST and PubChem. All of these resources can be accessed through the NCBI home page at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
Article
Full-text available
Investigation into the earliest signs of autism in infants has become a significant sub-field of autism research. This work invokes specific ethical concerns such as use of ‘at-risk’ language, communicating study findings to parents and the future perspective of enrolled infants when they reach adulthood. This study aimed to ground this research field in an understanding of the perspectives of members of the autism community. Following focus groups to identify topics, an online survey was distributed to autistic adults, parents of children with autism and practitioners in health and education settings across 11 European countries. Survey respondents (n = 2317) were positively disposed towards early autism research, and there was significant overlap in their priorities for the field and preferred language to describe infant research participants. However, there were also differences including overall less favourable endorsement of early autism research by autistic adults relative to other groups and a dislike of the phrase ‘at-risk’ to describe infant participants, in all groups except healthcare practitioners. The findings overall indicate that the autism community in Europe is supportive of early autism research. Researchers should endeavour to maintain this by continuing to take community perspectives into account.
Article
Full-text available
Identifying biomarkers for autism can improve outcomes for those affected by autism. Engaging the diverse stakeholders in the research process using community-based participatory research (CBPR) can accelerate biomarker discovery into clinical applications. However, there are limited examples of stakeholder involvement in autism research, possibly due to conceptual and practical concerns. We evaluate the applicability of CBPR principles to biomarker discovery in autism and critically review empirical studies adopting these principles. Using a scoping review methodology, we identified and evaluated seven studies using CBPR principles in biomarker discovery. Results and conclusions The limited number of studies in biomarker discovery adopting CBPR principles coupled with their methodological limitations suggests that such applications are feasible but challenging. These studies illustrate three CBPR themes: community assessment, setting global priorities, and collaboration in research design. We propose that further research using participatory principles would be useful in accelerating the pace of discovery and the development of clinically meaningful biomarkers. For this goal to be successful we advocate for increased attention to previously identified conceptual and methodological challenges to participatory approaches in health research, including improving scientific rigor and developing long-term partnerships among stakeholders.
Article
Full-text available
There has been a substantial increase in research activity on autism during the past decade. Research into effective ways of responding to the immediate needs of autistic people is, however, less advanced, as are efforts at translating basic science research into service provision. Involving community members in research is one potential way of reducing this gap. This study therefore investigated the views of community involvement in autism research both from the perspectives of autism researchers and of community members, including autistic adults, family members and practitioners. Results from a large-scale questionnaire study (n = 1,516) showed that researchers perceive themselves to be engaged with the autism community but that community members, most notably autistic people and their families, did not share this view. Focus groups/interviews with 72 participants further identified the potential benefits and remaining challenges to involvement in research, especially regarding the distinct perspectives of different stakeholders. Researchers were skeptical about the possibilities of dramatically increasing community engagement, while community members themselves spoke about the challenges to fully understanding and influencing the research process. We suggest that the lack of a shared approach to community engagement in UK autism research represents a key roadblock to translational endeavors.
Article
Full-text available
Participatory research aims to increase the relevance and broaden the implementation of health research by involving those affected by the outcomes of health studies. Few studies within the field of neurodevelopmental disorders, particularly autism spectrum disorders, have involved autistic individuals as partners. This study sought to identify and characterize published participatory research partnerships between researchers and individuals with autism spectrum disorder or other neurodevelopmental disorders and examine the influence of participatory research partnerships on the research process and reported study outcomes. A search of databases and review of gray literature identified seven studies that described participatory research partnerships between academic researchers and individuals with autism spectrum disorder or other neurodevelopmental disorders. A comparative analysis of the studies revealed two key themes: (1) variations in the participatory research design and (2) limitations during the reporting of the depth of the partner’s involvement. Both themes potentially limit the application and generalizability of the findings. The results of the review are discussed in relation to the use of evaluative frameworks for such participatory research studies to determine the potential benefits of participatory research partnerships within the neurodevelopmental and autism spectrum disorder populations.
Article
Should we continue to refer to autism as a ‘disease’ or ‘disorder’, or is the framework of ‘neurodiversity’ a more humane and accurate lens through which to view people with autism? Evidence at the genetic, neural, behavioural and cognitive levels reveals people with autism show both differences, and signs of disability, but not disorder. Disability requires societal support, acceptance of difference and diversity, and societal “reasonable adjustment”, whilst disorder is usually taken to require cure or treatment. These are very different frameworks. It will be important to see how the concept of neurodiversity is applied to the 300 diagnoses in DSM-5, and if it revolutionizes both the science and the practice of psychiatry.
Article
Objective: To illustrate the process of community-partnered participatory research (CPPR) to develop and evaluate interventions for children with autism in urban school districts METHODS: We formed partnerships of school personnel, parents, and researchers to guide the project. We then conducted focus groups, key informant interviews, and town halls to explore how public schools currently serve students with autism. We used findings from these activities to adapt interventions for public schools. We then tested interventions in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Results: Community input indicated a particular need for interventions to improve children's social interaction and instructional supports to promote their success throughout the day. Based on this input, we adapted two interventions: Remaking Recess for improving peer engagement during social times; and Schedules, Tools, and Activities for Transition (STAT) for facilitating successful transitions between activities throughout the daily routine. Results of the RCT of Remaking Recess are not yet available. The RCT of STAT involved 150 children and 56 teachers. Teachers reported high buy-in and increased their proficiency at implementing STAT; children with ASD reduced their disruptive behavior and made progress toward teacher-nominated goals. However, teachers' implementation remained inconsistent, and children did not reliably improve in academic engagement or independence. Conclusions: The findings suggest that, although CPPR has limitations, it can assist in selecting interventions to address community priorities and produce some favorable outcomes for children with autism in public schools. An important next step is to evaluate the sustainability of the interventions introduced in this project.
Article
Progress in understanding the genetic etiology of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) has fueled remarkable advances in our understanding of its potential neurobiological mechanisms. Yet, at the same time, these findings highlight extraordinary causal diversity and complexity at many levels ranging from molecules to circuits and emphasize the gaps in our current knowledge. Here we review current understanding of the genetic architecture of ASD and integrate genetic evidence, neuropathology and studies in model systems with how they inform mechanistic models of ASD pathophysiology. Despite the challenges, these advances provide a solid foundation for the development of rational, targeted molecular therapies.
Article
The latent class structure of autism symptoms from the time of diagnosis to age 6 years was examined in a sample of 280 children with autism spectrum disorder. Factor mixture modeling was performed on 26 algorithm items from the Autism Diagnostic Interview - Revised at diagnosis (Time 1) and again at age 6 (Time 2). At Time 1, a "2-factor/3-class" model provided the best fit to the data. At Time 2, a "2-factor/2-class" model provided the best fit to the data. Longitudinal (repeated measures) analysis of variance showed that the "2-factor/3-class" model derived at the time of diagnosis allows for the identification of a subgroup of children (9 % of sample) who exhibit notable reduction in symptom severity.