Content uploaded by Marcos Gabriel Becerra
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Marcos Gabriel Becerra on Jun 28, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Heterodonty and double occlusion in Manidens condorensis: a unique
adaptation in an Early Jurassic ornithischian improving
masticatory efficiency
Marcos G. Becerra
1
&Diego Pol
1
&Gertrud E. Rössner
2
&Oliver W. M. Rauhut
2
Received: 27 March 2018 /Revised: 31 May 2018 /Accepted: 2 June 2018
#Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018
Abstract
New materials of the ornithischian dinosaur Manidens condorensis highlight a strong heterodonty between the upper and lower
dentitions and reveal a novel occlusion type previously unreported in herbivorous dinosaurs. The diamond-shaped maxillary
teeth have prominent cingular entolophs in a V- to Z-shaped configuration that are absent in dentary teeth. These cingular
entolophs bear denticles and serrations with vertical wear that is coplanar with the apical wear facets, supporting their involve-
ment in chewing. The separated apical and basal wear in dentary teeth is consistent with the apical and cingular wear in maxillary
teeth, indicating an alternate occlusion, an orthal jaw motion, and shearing interactions between marginal and cingular edges in a
double occlusion. Measurements of the length and wear area along the marginal and cingular edges indicate that the latter are
functionally equivalent to adding eight teeth to a maxillary toothrow of ten, almost doubling the lengths of cutting edges and the
degree of intraoral processing, while maintaining a plesiomorphic skull anatomy, an adaptation to herbivory unique in
Ornithischia.
Keywords Manidens condorensis .Ornithischia .Maxillary dentition .Heterodonty .Jaw mechanics
Introduction
The diversity of ornithischian dinosaurs was low before the
Middle Jurassic in comparison with sauropodomorph and the-
ropod clades (Irmis et al. 2007; Barrett et al. 2009). In contrast,
ornithischians occupied herbivorous niches at low to interme-
diate highs of the vertical tiering during the second half of the
Mesozoic and evolved the most sophisticated jaw mechanics
among archosaurs (Cuthbertson et al., 2012; Williams et al.
2009; Sereno et al. 2010; Ösi et al. 2014; and references
therein). Common craniomandibular adaptations of ornithis-
chians to herbivory include a horny beak, an increase in num-
ber and decrease in size of teeth, the integration of individual
teeth into sophisticated tooth batteries, medial displacement of
the toothrow, ventral displacement of the jaw articulation, and
increase of jaw adductor musculature and bite force
(Nabavizadeh 2016; Strickson et al. 2016; MacLaren et al.
2017; and references therein). Heterodontosauridae represents
the first radiation of ornithischians and possibly the first
adapted to herbivory (Butler et al. 2008), including basal spe-
cies with low, triangular, and well-spaced denticulated tooth
crowns (Sereno 2012) and derived forms with tall and
diamond-shaped teeth in a closely packed dentition, with
oblique wear facets (Norman et al. 2011). Manidens
condorensis from the late Early Jurassic of Argentina has been
interpreted as a morphologically intermediate stage in the evo-
lution of Heterodontosauridae in terms of its dentition (Pol et
al. 2011; Becerra et al. 2014). Here, we report new materials
that preserve its maxillary dentition and reveal an unreported
occlusion pattern interpreted as an adaptation to herbivory that
increases masticatory efficiency.
Communicated by: Sven Thatje
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article
(https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-018-1569-6) contains supplementary
material, which is available to authorized users.
*Marcos G. Becerra
mbecerra@mef.org.ar
1
CONICET- Museo Paleontológico Egidio Feruglio, Fontana 140,
U9100GYO Trelew, Chubut, Argentina
2
SNSB, Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie,
andDepartmentforEarthandEnvironmentalSciencesand
GeoBioCenter, LMU München, Richard-Wagner-Str. 10,
80333 Munich, Germany
The Science of Nature (2018) 105:41
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-018-1569-6
Materials and methods
All materials were recovered from the Cañadón Asfalto
Formation (Pol et al. 2011) and are housed at Museo
Paleontológico Egidio Feruglio (Trelew, Chubut). Micro-
tomography in MPEF-PV 3211 and 3809 was conducted at
Staatliche Naturwissenschaftliche Sammlungen Bayerns in
Munich. DICOM datasets processing to 3D reconstructions
was made with 3DSlicer version 4.3.0 (Fedorov et al. 2012).
The measurement of chewing margins and wear facets in
MPEF-PV 3809 was made with ImageJ (Schneider et al.
2012). More details are presented at the Online Resource 2.
Results
Teeth The dentary teeth of Manidens have an asymmetrical
diamond-shaped outline, with the length of the mesial carina
about 60% the distal carina, one to two denticles mesially and
four to six distally, showing a mesial cavity and crenulated
edges of the denticles (Online Resource 1). The dentary
toothrow is notably heterodont in terms of size and shape
including the presence of a large caniniform in the first tooth
position (Pol et al. 2011).
The maxillary dentition of the holotype of Manidens
(MPEF-PV 3211) was 3D reconstructed based on micro-CT
data (Fig. 1a, b; Online Resource 1). A new isolated maxilla
(MPEF-PV 3809) preserves ten maxillary teeth and replace-
ment teeth (Fig. 1c–e; Online Resource 1) and can be referred
to Manidens condorensis on the basis of autapomorphies in
tooth morphology.
Wear has erased the apical features of the anterior maxillary
teeth in MPEF-PV 3211 (M2–M5) and 3809 (M3–M4), but
these are present in MPEF-PV 3818, an isolated, apicobasally
tall, and slender crown (Fig. 1b, d–f). Some teeth in MPEF-PV
3211 (M6–M8) and 3809 (M5–M10) show two to three den-
ticles symmetrically distributed around the apical denticle,
each forming a rather low apex (Fig. 1b–e). The mesial cavity
is present from M5 onwards in both specimens (Fig. 1c,
Online Resource 1), although all the maxillary dentition is
closely packed, in contrast to the dentary dentition (Becerra
et al. 2014). In both specimens, an oblique distal ectoloph is
evident from position M4 onwards and an oblique distal
entoloph from M3 onwards (Fig. 1d, e; Online Resource 1).
A mesial entoloph appears from positions M5–M6, obliquely
oriented in M6 and almost horizontally in M7–M8 in MPEF-
PV 3211, and similarly oblique for M5–M7 and horizontal for
M8–M10inMPEF-PV3809(Fig.1b, d–e). Cingular
entolophs are apically oriented and extend over half of the
crown, gradually changing from a V- to a Z-shaped configu-
ration; their mesiodistal length and medial prominence in-
crease posteriorly (Fig. 1d, e). Additionally, the cingular
entolophsin MPEF-PV 3809and isolated maxillary teeth bear
ornamentations, with large denticles at the mesial entolophs
(two to three denticles in M5–M6), and small serrations at the
distal entolophs (M5–
M7). Maxillary and dentary cheek den-
titions share the same size heterodonty (Becerra et al. 2014).
Maxillary teeth have thickened enamel over the cutting edge
of the denticles instead of crenulated margins, evident in iso-
lated teeth (Online Resource 1). Isolated teeth show up to
seven denticles in their mesial entoloph and an extra mesial
ectoloph that morphologically varies from a rounded promi-
nence to a denticulated edge (Fig. 1g, h), features possibly
increasing posteriorly along the toothrow (Online Resource 1).
Manidens differs from other heterodontosaurids and ornith-
ischians in the marked morphological differentiation between
the upper and lower toothrows (Fig. 1i, j). The symmetric
distribution of denticles of the diamond-shaped maxillary den-
tition of Manidens is shared with Echinodon,whiletheasym-
metrichand-shapeddentaryteetharesimilartothoseof
Pegomastax (Sereno 2012). Cingular protuberances were re-
ported in other heterodontosaurids: distal ectolophs in
Lycorhinus angustidens, and slight ectolophs in Tianyulong,
the posterior teeth of Echinodon, and the largest crowns of
Fruitadens (Sereno 2012, and references therein). Outside
Heterodontosauridae, some species of Thyreophora, basal
Ornithopoda, Pachycephalosauria, and basal Ceratopsia have
evolved cingular edges in their dentition (exhaustive compar-
ison in Online Resource 2). Nevertheless, upper and lower
tooth rows in these species are morphologically similar and
specularly arranged (Weishampel et al. 2004).
Wear facets Wear on dentary teeth of Manidens is character-
ized by a near vertical orientation of distinct apical and basal
facets (Becerra et al. 2014), identified in the type specimen
and isolated teeth (Online Resource 1). Apical wear facets
face posteriorly in distal denticles and the crown apex, and
anteriorly in the facets of mesial denticles. Basal wear facets
are also located either distally or mesially on the base of the
crown and are coplanar with the apical facets.
Wear facets on maxillary teeth are present at the apical and
lingual cingular margins. As in dentary teeth (Becerra et al.
2014), the facets are almost vertically oriented (67°/77° for
apical/cingular wear with respect to the horizontal plane)
and are flat to concave, depending on the degree of develop-
ment (Fig. 1d, e). Anterior teeth have apical wear facets larger
than the cingular facets, but in posterior teeth, the apical facets
are smaller than those of the cingular entolophs. The wear
facets show a step at their basal enamel-dentine boundary
(trailing edge) and a continuous transition at their apical limit
(leading edge) (Online Resource 1). As in dentary teeth, apical
and basal wear facets located on the distal half of the crown
face slightly posteriorly, while those on the mesial half face
anteriorly (Fig. 2a–f). Additional wear is present at the non-
occlusal surface of some of the dentary and maxillary teeth
(Online Resource 1).
41 Page 2 of 5 Sci Nat (2018) 105:41
Discussion
Scratch orientation in wear facets of maxillary (apical and
cingular) and dentary (apical) teeth (with angles ranging
around 80–105° and variable lengths), together with the lead-
ing and trailing edges located apically and basally in these
facets, support a simple orthal jaw closure (Fig. 2e, f,
Online Resource 1). Wear at the non-occlusal surface of teeth,
with smoothened boundaries and few randomly oriented
scratches, is likely due to food abrasion (Fig. 2a,
Online Resource 1). No wear was identified within the
paracingular fossa (Fig. 2a), indicating that the apex of the
antagonistic crown did not fit within this fossa (as the cusp-
basin occlusion of tribosphenic mammals). The different
orientation of wear facets in mesial and distal regions in
maxillary and dentary crowns indicates an imbricating,
and, probably, precise occlusion of the opposing toothrows
(Fig. 2e). The coplanar orientation of apical and basal wear
facets indicates that the apical carinae of dentary teeth oc-
cluded with the apical and cingular margins of maxillary
teeth, forming a double sequential occlusion (Fig. 2f).
Thus,inadditiontotheshearingmotionofapex-apexcon-
tact, the apical carinae of dentary teeth formed a second
shearing interaction with the cingular entolophs of maxil-
lary teeth during the same masticatory cycle, a feature pre-
viously unknown in other dinosaurs.
Fig. 1 a,c3D reconstructions of
MPEF-PV 3211 and MPEF-PV
3809 in right and medial views
highlighting the functional
(orange/darker gray) and
replacement maxillary teeth
(yellow/brighter gray). b
Maxillary teeth M7–M8 of
MPEF-PV 3211 in lingual view.
d,eDentition of MPEF-PV 3809
in lingual view. fMPEF-PV 3818
in lingual view. g,hMPEF-PV
3820 in labial and lingual views,
respectively. Additional isolated
maxillary teeth in
Online Resource 1.i,jHypothetic
reconstruction of dentition in
Manidens condorensis in qlabial
and rlingual views, based on this
work and unpublished informa-
tion (MPEF-PV 3808, gray
caniniform; Becerra et al., in
prep.). Abbreviations: awf, apical
wear facet; cwf, cingular wear
facet; dec, distal ectoloph; den,
distal entoloph; mcd, mesial
cingular denticle; mec, mesial
ectoloph; men, mesial entoloph;
nwf, wear at the non-functional
face
Sci Nat (2018) 105:41 Page 3 of 5 41
The double shearing mechanism of Manidens improves the
masticatory efficiency of the toothrow. The length of shearing
apical margins of the upper toothrow is subequal to the length
of shearing margins of the entoloph (21.76 versus 19.83 mm;
Fig. 2b, c). Similarly, the area of the apical wear facets is
3.615 mm
2
and that of the cingular wear facets is
2.895 mm
2
(80.1% of the apical wear; Fig. 2b, d). Thus,
both the length and area of the occlusal surface provided by
the cingular entolophs in Manidens almost double the mas-
ticatory efficiency by adding a shear power equivalent to
6.4 to 8.2 additional teeth (based on the sum of marginal
area or length) if only the apical carina was functional
(Online Resource 3).
The unique characteristics of the jaw mechanics of
Manidens (plesiomorphic orthal occlusion and a double
cutting edge) were achieved through minor morphological
modifications that almost double the masticatory efficiency,
ultimately reducing the energy spent in tooth formation and
mandibular motion. This deviates from previous evolutionary
trends in Ornithischia (Sereno 1997;Belletal.2009;Erickson
et al. 2012; and references therein), in which improvements in
mastication efficiency were commonly achieved through the
development of dental batteries, the increase in rostral length
of the skull, or by acquiring a complex jaw motion. These
new data of the dentition of Manidens reveal previously
unrecognized functional and morphological adaptations in
Heterodontosauridae during the first radiation of ornithis-
chians in the Early Jurassic, adding to the already diverse
array of herbivorous adaptations known in ornithischian
dinosaurs.
Fig. 2 aSEM imaging of MPEF-
PV 3820 in occlusal view. lines
indicate the interaction facets with
two antagonistic teeth, dots
indicate food abrasion facets, and
hues differentiate apical from
cingular wear. bSchematics of
the dentition of MPEF-PV 3809,
lines and dark areas representing
the length and wear facet
measurements as they were taken.
c,dPlots depicting measured
values of length (c) and wear area
(d) on each tooth position, with
hypothetic values for M2. e
Hypothetical staggered tooth
occlusion based on wear
development (contact of different
opposing tooth in blue, red, and
yellow or hues of gray), with f
two shearing interactions at the
same masticatory cycle in a
double occlusion
41 Page 4 of 5 Sci Nat (2018) 105:41
Acknowledgements Dr. Y. Herrera (UNLP), the institution and stafffrom
the Staatliche Naturwissenschaftliche Sammlungen Bayerns (Munich),
and the reviewers are thanked.
Funding information The Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
(DAAD) financed the travel for M.G.B. to Germany (ID 57130097);
fieldwork and research were supported by Agencia Nacional de
Promoción Científica y Técnica to D.P. (ANPCyT, PICT 1288 and
0808), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to O.W.M.R. (DFG,
RA1012/9-1), and National Science Fundation to Dr. G. Rougier (NSF,
DEB 0946430 and DEB 1068089).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.
References
Barrett PM, McGowan AJ, Page V (2009) Dinosaur diversity and the
rock record. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:2667–2674
Becerra MG, Pol D, Marsicano CA, Rauhut OWM (2014) The dentition
of Manidens condorensis (Ornithischia; Heterodontosauridae) from
the Jurassic Cañadón Asfalto Formation of Patagonia: morphology,
heterodonty and the use of statistical methods for identifying isolat-
ed teeth. Hist Biol 26:480–492
Bell PR, Snively E, Shychoski L (2009) A comparison of the jaw me-
chanics in hadrosaurid and ceratopsid dinosaurs using finite element
analysis. Anat Rec 292:1338–1351
Butler RJ, Upchurch P, Norman DB (2008) The phylogeny of the ornith-
ischian dinosaurs. J Syst Palaeontol 6:1–40
Cuthbertson RS, Tirabasso A, Rybczynski N, Holmes RB (2012) Kinetic
limitations of intracranial joints in Brachylophosaurus canadensis
and Edmontosaurus regalis (Dinosauria: Hadrosauridae), and their
implications for the chewing mechanics of hadrosaurids. Anat Rec
295:968–979
Erickson GM, Krick BA, Hamilton M, Bourne GR, Norell MA,
Lilleodden E, Sawyer WG (2012) Complex dental structure and
wear biomechanics in hadrosaurid dinosaurs. Science 338:98–101
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC,
Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J
(2012) 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the
Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 30:1323–
1341
Irmis RB, Parker WG, Nesbitt SJ, Liu J (2007) Early ornithischian dino-
saurs: the Triassic record. Hist Biol 19:3–22
MacLaren JA, Anderson PS, Barrett PM, Rayfield EJ (2017) Herbivorous
dinosaur jaw disparity and its relationship to extrinsic evolutionary
drivers. Paleobiology 43:15–33
Nabavizadeh A (2016) Evolutionary trends in the jaw adductor mechan-
ics of ornithischian dinosaurs. Anat Rec 299:271–294
Norman DB, Crompton AW, Butler RJ, Porro LB, Charig AJ (2011) The
Lower Jurassic ornithischian dinosaur Heterodontosaurus tucki
Crompton & Charig, 1962: cranial anatomy, functional morphology,
taxonomy, and relationships. Zool J Linn Soc-Lond 163:182–276
Ösi A, Barrett PM, Földes T, Tokai R (2014) Wear pattern, dental func-
tion, and jaw mechanism in the Late Cretaceous ankylosaur
Hungarosaurus. Anat Rec 297:1165–1180
Pol D, Rauhut OWM, Becerra MG (2011) A Middle Jurassic
heterodontosaurid dinosaur from Patagonia and the evolution of
heterodontosaurids. Naturwissenschaften 98:369–379
Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH image to ImageJ:
25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675
Sereno PC (1997) The origin and evolution of dinosaurs. Annu Rev Earth
Pl Sc 25:435–489
Sereno PC (2012) Taxonomy, morphology, masticatory function and phy-
logeny of heterodontosaurid dinosaurs. ZooKeys 226:1–225
Sereno PC, Xijin Z, Lin T (2010) A new psittacosaur from Inner
Mongolia and the parrot-like structure and function of the
psittacosaur skull. Proc R Soc Lond B 277:199–209
Strickson E, Prieto-Márquez A, Benton MJ, Stubbs TL (2016) Dynamics
of dental evolution in ornithopod dinosaurs. Sci Rep-UK 6:28904
Weishampel DB, Dodson P, Osmólska H (2004) The Dinosauria, 2nd
edn. University of California Press, Berkeley
Williams VS, Barrett PM, Purnell MA (2009) Quantitative analysis of
dental microwear in hadrosaurid dinosaurs, and the implications for
hypotheses of jaw mechanics and feeding. P Natl Acad Sci USA
106:11194–11199
Sci Nat (2018) 105:41 Page 5 of 5 41