A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
1 3
Journal of Comparative Physiology B (2018) 188:877–888
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-018-1168-z
ORIGINAL PAPER
Seasonal variation inenergy expenditure inarodent inhabiting
awinter-rainfall desert
RebeccaRimbach1 · StéphaneBlanc2· AlexandreZahariev2· MariaGatta1,3· NevillePillay1· CarstenSchradin1,2
Received: 12 January 2018 / Revised: 23 May 2018 / Accepted: 29 May 2018 / Published online: 8 June 2018
© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018
Abstract
Animals that spend more energy than they obtain risk entering allostatic overload, reducing survival and fitness. They are
predicted to adjust their daily energy expenditure (DEE) during periods of food scarcity. Adjustments of DEE to changes
in food availability have been well-studied in species in temperate zones during winter, but less so in species enduring sea-
sonal droughts. Likely mechanisms regulating DEE involve adjustments of activity and maintenance metabolism. Species
that experience seasonal droughts and changes in food availability, like the African striped mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio),
are appropriate model organisms to study the regulation of seasonal changes of DEE. We quantified DEE using the ‘doubly
labelled water’ method, measured resting metabolic rate (RMR), and concomitantly determined activity levels using all-day
focal observations of 69 free-living striped mice in the cold moist season with high food availability and the hot dry season
with low food availability. Striped mice decreased their DEE in the food scarce dry season using multiple mechanisms,
especially reductions in RMR, and reduced overall physical activity. This was further facilitated passively by reduced ther-
moregulatory costs. Our study demonstrates that animals reduce DEE via active and passive mechanisms in food-restricted
environments, and highlights that several environmental factors should be considered simultaneously when aiming to under-
stand how animals cope with harsh environments.
Keywords Drought· Eco-physiology· Energetics· Field metabolic rate· Physical activity level· Phenotypic flexibility
Introduction
An individual’s fitness is affected by the balance between
acquisition and expenditure of energy, which is essential for
maintenance, growth, survival and reproduction (Krackow
1989; Boutin 1990). In nature, availability of food, the
primary source of energy for animals, varies both on a
spatial and a temporal scale. For many species, seasonal
changes in rainfall and temperature cause significant varia-
tion in food availability, often characterized by one season
with super-abundant food (often the breeding season), and
one season with low food availability, which has to be sur-
vived to reach the following breeding season. While climate
change might increase the likelihood of periods of food scar-
city, such as droughts and extreme weather events, so far we
do not know in how far animals are able to reduce their daily
energy expenditure (DEE) as an adaptive response to such
events. When energy expenditure exceeds energy acquisi-
tion, allostatic overload occurs, which leads to a decrease
in body condition, reduced fitness, pathologies and finally,
if it persists, death due to starvation occurs (McEwen and
Wingfield 2003; Romero etal. 2009). When energy acquisi-
tion is reduced and migration to other areas is not possible,
decreasing energy expenditure is the only adaptive solution
to avoid or reduce allostatic overload.
During food shortages, energy investment into repro-
duction is typically the first expenditure that is ceased
Communicated by H.V. Carey.
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this
article (https ://doi.org/10.1007/s0036 0-018-1168-z) contains
supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
* Rebecca Rimbach
rrimbach@gmail.com; Rebecca.Rimbach@wits.ac.za
1 School ofAnimal, Plant andEnvironmental Sciences,
University oftheWitwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits,
Johannesburg2050, SouthAfrica
2 IPHC, UNISTRA, CNRS, 23 rue du Loess,
67200Strasbourg, France
3 Institute ofEnvironmental Sciences, Leiden University, PO
Box9518, 2300RALeiden, TheNetherlands
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.