The camp is the space that is opened when the state of exception begins to become the rule. . . Insofar as its inhabitants [are] stripped of every political status and wholly reduced to bare life, the camp [is] also the most absolute biopolitical space ever to have been realized, in which power confronts nothing but pure life, without any mediation.'' 1 I N Italian philosopher Giorgio Agamben's concept of the ''state of exception'', human beings are reduced to a condition of ''bare life'', banished from the dignities of citizenship and the protections of ordinary rights. While Agamben considers the Nazi concentration camps as the paradigm case, he warns that under conditions of global economic and ecological crisis and rampant militarism, growing numbers of people find themselves stripped of ordinary rights or even ''the right to have rights'' . 2 These include not only the detainees in militarised sites of the US-led war on terror, but also the millions of internally displaced and transnational migrants and refugees fleeing war, ethnic and armed conflict, tsunami, hurricanes, floods and other disasters. By the end of 2006, according to estimates by the United Nations High Commission on Refugees (UNHCR), nearly 33 million men, women and children worldwide qualified for humanitarian assistance: refugees, asylum-seekers, internally displaced persons (IDPs), returnees, and stateless persons. This was an increase of 56% over the available statistics for 2005, reflecting escalating armed conflicts, e.g. in Iraq, Lebanon, Sri Lanka and Timor-Leste. 3 The immediate – and in many cases long-term – result has been the wholesale concentration of ''forced migrants'' in camps and other displacement centres. It is hardly surprising that the face of disas-ter – whether natural or conflict-induced – is highly gendered, as well as marked by divisions of class, race, ethnicity and age. Confronting this reality, increasing numbers of researchers, advocates and agencies have begun to address the gender dimensions of disaster, particularly those related to sexual and reproductive health and sexual and other forms of violence. More-over, as articles in this volume by Judy Austin et al and Audrey Macklin examine, beginning in the mid-1990s with the International Confer-ence on Population and Development (ICPD) in Cairo* and reactions to the crises in Bosnia and Rwanda, a series of international and inter-governmental initiatives have attempted to secure the access of both refugees and internally dis-placed persons to basic health care services, including reproductive health services and family planning. These efforts have included the work of the Inter-Agency Working Group on Repro-ductive Health in Crises and its Field Manual on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations; the Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium; the Minimum Initial Service Pack-age that became part of the 2004 revised Sphere Minimum Standards for response to disaster; and UNHCR documents, including most recently, its 2008 Handbook for the Protection of Women and Girls.