ArticlePDF Available

Nuclear Power in Italy: Lost and Potential Role in Decarbonizing the Electric System


Abstract and Figures

In December 1988 Italy decided to abort the construction of the Montalto di Castro nuclear power plant (two reactors of 982 MWe each). Two years later, Trino Vercellese (260 MWe) and Caorso (880 MWe) reactors were finally shut down, thus officially heralding the end of the Italian nuclear electricity production. In this study we analyse the impact of these decisions on the Italian energy policies, primarily in terms of failed reduction of GHG emissions. Our retrospective analysis assumes Trino and Caorso plants being kept in operation up to forty years since the first grid-connection, as well as the commercial operation of Montalto reactors hypothetically starting in 1992. The study further examines the potentiality of new nuclear power capacity installation in shaping the Italian future energy mix, by means of two modeled scenarios: 1) a basic scenario in which the thermoelectric power from coal is merely replaced and 2) an advanced scenario in which the share of low-carbon electricity production becomes predominant by means of the new nuclear generation capacity share as opposed to a sole increase of wind and solar power. We estimate the cumulative and yearly values of GHG emissions for new power installations considering the Life-Cycle Assessment data available in literature. For postulated additional nuclear power we model a suited unit plant from average technical features of reactors which became operational since 2011. In the advanced scenarios we also evaluate the land use intensity (unit area needed per unit energy output) and the overall reliability of the electric mix. In particular, we quantify the land use avoided thanks to the increase in electricity generation from nuclear power plants in place of wind or solar power generation. Modeled GHG emission reductions emissions are compared to those calculated starting from the projections of the EU Reference Scenario 2016, which includes policies and measures adopted by EU Member States by December 2014.
Content may be subject to copyright.
A preview of the PDF is not available
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Full-text available
This study presents roadmaps for each of the 50 United States to convert their all-purpose energy systems (for electricity, transportation, heating/cooling, and industry) to ones powered entirely by wind, water, and sunlight (WWS). The plans contemplate 80-85% of existing energy replaced by 2030 and 100% replaced by 2050. Conversion would reduce each state’s end-use power demand by a mean of ~39.3% with ~82.4% of this due to the efficiency of electrification and the rest due to end-use energy efficiency improvements. Year 2050 end-use U.S. all-purpose load would be met with ~30.9% onshore wind, ~19.1% offshore wind, ~30.7% utility-scale photovoltaics (PV), ~7.2% rooftop PV, ~7.3% concentrated solar power (CSP) with storage, ~1.25% geothermal power, ~0.37% wave power, ~0.14% tidal power, and ~3.01% hydroelectric power. Based on a parallel grid integration study, an additional 4.4% and 7.2% of power beyond that needed for annual loads would be supplied by CSP with storage and solar thermal for heat, respectively, for peaking and grid stability. Over all 50 states, converting would provide ~3.9 million 40-year construction jobs and ~2.0 million 40-year operation jobs for the energy facilities alone, the sum of which would outweigh the ~3.9 million jobs lost in the conventional energy sector. Converting would also eliminate ~62,000 (19,000-115,000) U.S. air pollution premature mortalities/yr today and ~46,000 (12,000-104,000) in 2050, avoiding ~$600 ($85-$2,400) bil./yr (2013 dollars) in 2050, equivalent to ~3.6 (0.5-14.3) percent of the 2014 U.S. gross domestic product. Converting would further eliminate ~$3.3 (1.9-7.1) tril./yr in 2050 global warming costs to the world due to U.S. emissions. These plans will result in each person in the U.S. in 2050 saving ~$260 (190-320)/yr in energy costs ($2013 dollars) and U.S. health and global climate costs per person decreasing by ~$1,500 (210-6,000)/yr and ~$8,300 (4,700-17,600)/yr, respectively. The new footprint over land required will be ~0.42% of U.S. land. The spacing area between wind turbines, which can be used for multiple purposes, will be ~1.6% of U.S. land. Thus, 100% conversions are technically and economically feasible with little downside. These roadmaps may therefore reduce social and political barriers to implementing clean-energy policies.
Full-text available
This report presents the state-level results of a spatial analysis effort calculating energy technical potential, reported in square kilometers of available land, megawatts of capacity, and gigawatt-hours of generation, for six different renewable technologies. For this analysis, the system specific power density (or equivalent), efficiency (capacity factor), and land-use constraints were identified for each technology using independent research, published research, and professional contacts. This report also presents technical potential findings from previous reports.
Full-text available
Several states and countries have adopted targets for deep reductions in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, but there has been little physically realistic modeling of the energy and economic transformations required. We analyzed the infrastructure and technology path required to meet California’s goal of an 80% reduction below 1990 levels, using detailed modeling of infrastructure stocks, resource constraints, and electricity system operability. We found that technically feasible levels of energy efficiency and decarbonized energy supply alone are not sufficient; widespread electrification of transportation and other sectors is required. Decarbonized electricity would become the dominant form of energy supply, posing challenges and opportunities for economic growth and climate policy. This transformation demands technologies that are not yet commercialized, as well as coordination of investment, technology development, and infrastructure deployment.
This Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Special Report (IPCC-SRREN) assesses the potential role of renewable energy in the mitigation of climate change. It covers the six most important renewable energy sources - bioenergy, solar, geothermal, hydropower, ocean and wind energy - as well as their integration into present and future energy systems. It considers the environmental and social consequences associated with the deployment of these technologies, and presents strategies to overcome technical as well as non-technical obstacles to their application and diffusion. SRREN brings a broad spectrum of technology-specific experts together with scientists studying energy systems as a whole. Prepared following strict IPCC procedures, it presents an impartial assessment of the current state of knowledge: it is policy relevant but not policy prescriptive. SRREN is an invaluable assessment of the potential role of renewable energy for the mitigation of climate change for policymakers, the private sector, and academic researchers.
This is the electronic version of the book which is also available in hardback and paperback.
Italy, after the vote of the referendum in 1987, stopped producing electricity from nuclear fuel for the energy demand. This paper analyses the current Italian energy outlook and clarifies how the choice to abandon the nuclear option damaged our economy. Nowadays, the possible reintroduction of civil nuclear option is hindered by groups claiming that nuclear energy is not convenient and is incredibly dangerous. In this paper it is clarified with international references how this is not correct and why Italy should start thinking seriously and without prejudices at future energy options.
  • D Romano
  • C Arcarese
  • A Bernetti
  • A Caputo
  • M Contaldi
  • R De Lauretis
  • E Di Cristofaro
  • A Gagna
  • B Gonella
  • E Taurino
  • M Vitullo
Romano, D., Arcarese, C., Bernetti, A., Caputo, A., Contaldi, M., De Lauretis, R., Di Cristofaro, E., Gagna, A., Gonella, B., Taurino, E., Vitullo, M., Italian Greenhouse Gas Inventory 19902015, Report 261/2017, Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale, 2017