Article

Is interoceptive sentivivity linked to interoceptive awareness in Alexithymia?

DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.03.135
Authors:
Cristina Scarpazza at University of Padova
Cristina Scarpazza
H. Huang
H. Huang
H. Huang
  • This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.
Andrea Zangrossi at University of Padova
Andrea Zangrossi
Sebastiano Massaro at The Organizational Neuroscience Laboratory | University of Surrey | Warwick University
Sebastiano Massaro
  • The Organizational Neuroscience Laboratory | University of Surrey | Warwick University
Download citation
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.

What Do Measures of Self-Report Interoception Measure? Insights from A Systematic Review, Latent Factor Analysis, and Network Approach
Article
Full-text available
Recent conceptualizations of interoception suggest several facets to this construct, including "interoceptive sensibility” and “self-report interoceptive scales", both of which are assessed with questionnaires. Although these conceptual efforts have helped move the field forward, uncertainty remains regarding whether current measures converge on their measurement of a common construct. To address this question, we first identified -via a systematic review- the most cited questionnaires of interoceptive sensibility. Then, we examined their correlations, their overall factorial structure, and their network structure in a large community sample (n = 1003). The results indicate that these questionnaires tap onto distinct constructs, with low overall convergence and interrelationships between questionnaire items. This observation mitigates the interpretation and replicability of findings in self-report interoception research. We call for a better match between constructs and measures.
View
What Do Measures of Self-Report Interoception Measure? Insights from A Systematic Review, Latent Factor Analysis, and Network Approach
Preprint
Full-text available
  • Jan 2021
Recent conceptualizations of interoception suggest several facets to this construct, including "interoceptive sensibility” and “self-report interoceptive scales", both of which are assessed with questionnaires. Although these conceptual efforts have helped move the field forward, uncertainty remains regarding whether current measures converge on their measurement of a common construct. To address this question, we first identified -via a systematic review- the most cited questionnaires of interoceptive sensibility. Then, we examined their correlations, their overall factorial structure, and their network structure in a large community sample (n = 1003). The results indicate that these questionnaires tap onto distinct constructs, with low overall convergence and interrelationships between questionnaire items. This observation mitigates the interpretation and replicability of findings in self-report interoception research. We call for a better match between constructs and measures.
View
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.