ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

The straight line inertial path will be examined from the perspective that it is caused by pressure equilibrium in a sea of tiny aethereal whirlpools that are pressing against each other with centrifugal force while striving to dilate. This is opposite to the traditional perspective whereby centrifugal force is considered to be a consequence of the tendency of a body to move in uniform straight line motion in the absence of any Newtonian forces.
1
Straight Line Motion
Frederick David Tombe,
Northern Ireland, United Kingdom,
sirius184@hotmail.com
31st May 2018
Abstract. The straight line inertial path will be examined from the perspective that it is
caused by pressure equilibrium in a sea of tiny aethereal whirlpools that are pressing
against each other with centrifugal force while striving to dilate. This is opposite to the
traditional perspective whereby centrifugal force is considered to be a consequence of
the tendency of a body to move in uniform straight line motion in the absence of any
Newtonian forces.
The Centrifugal Field
I. Long ago mankind knew that space is rendered into tiny whirlpools that are
pressing against each other with centrifugal force while striving to dilate [1], [2],
[3]. Whirlpools have a rotation axis and so they exhibit cylindrical symmetry
which makes it difficult for some people to imagine how they would bond
together with their neighbours. It is proposed that in the absence of any radial
force fields that the individual rotation axes of these tiny whirlpools form
concentric rings around a moving object. The moving object’s line of motion
would be at right angles to the centrifugal pressure being exerted on it by the
tiny whirlpools striving to dilate. When this centrifugal pressure field (inertial
field) is symmetrical, the motion will constitute the straight line inertial path.
When many objects are simultaneously in motion in this all pervading sea of
tiny whirlpools, their superimposed centrifugal pressure fields are the reason
why a centrifugal force exists between any two objects that share mutual
transverse motion.
The inertial field is proposed to be the general principle that underlies both
the inertial forces and the magnetic field surrounding an electric current [4]. It’s
a geometrical fact that a moving object has a centrifugal acceleration to every
point in space that does not lie along its path of motion. This fact largely goes
unnoticed, disguised in the straight line inertial path, but it manifests itself as a
physical reality when the moving object is opposed by a centripetal force. A
centripetal force creates an imbalance in the inertial field. See the full
mathematical analysis at section VI in “Pythagoras’s Theorem in Seven
Dimensions[5].
At very high speeds, the inertial field surrounding a moving object would
be Doppler shifted backwards into the shape of a cone.
2
The Coriolis Field
II. The Coriolis field is a transitory aspect of the inertial pressure field. Its roots
lie in the gyroscopic behaviour of the tiny whirlpools which align to form the
inertial (centrifugal) field. This fundamental gyroscopic behaviour is the
tendency of the whirlpools in the immediate vicinity of a moving object to
realign so as that their rotation axes form solenoidal rings around the path of
motion. This is the basis of Ampère’s Circuital Law as explained by Maxwell in
his 1861 paper “On Physical Lines of Force” (equation (9) in Part I) [4]. On the
large scale however, centrifugal and Coriolis forces are dependent on the choice
of origin, and a physical effect that is deemed to be a centrifugal force from one
perspective could be deemed a Coriolis force from another perspective. The
inertial forces are not absolute quantities in kinematics. We can illustrate an
example of Coriolis force through a set-up like a freely rotating platform with a
radial groove. If we roll a marble outwards along the radial groove, the
tendency of the marble to move in its straight line inertial path will result in it
pressing against one side of the groove wall causing the turntable to angularly
decelerate, and vice-versa if we roll the marble towards the centre of the
turntable.
As a rule, we talk about Coriolis force when a radial motion is transversely
deflected in a rotating system. In the turntable example, it was only because of
our choice of origin that we called the transverse inertial force a Coriolis force.
The physical interaction between the marble and the wall of the groove was no
different in principle than had we considered a marble rolling around a circular
groove resulting in an outward centrifugal force pressing against the outer wall
of the groove. However, when we extrapolate the Coriolis force to the elements
of a pivoted precessing gyroscope, the very real anti-gravity effect is tied up
with a tendency for the rotation axis to realign, similar in principle to that which
occurs within the tiny whirlpools during the formation of the inertial field. The
gyroscopic behaviour of the tiny whirlpools that leads to the inertial field in the
first place is therefore replicating itself on the large scale within a laboratory
gyroscope indicating a consistent pattern of behaviour across different scales [6].
The tiny whirlpools that fill all of space are in effect the prototype
gyroscope. It would seem that the matrix of the universe is a compressed sea of
tiny fluid gyroscopes. These naturally self-align along their mutual rotation axes
forming solenoidal double helix magnetic or inertial lines of force [7], [8].
Conclusion
III. The inertial forces are real but they are not Newtonian forces. They are
relative and not absolute since they are origin dependent. They arise as a
consequence of Newton’s first law of motion but they are not included among
3
the forces that are relevant for the purpose of this law. Since centrifugal force is
most commonly encountered in the context of circular motion it is often hard
for people to grasp the fact that it is primarily a product of motion and not of
curvature. While they generally understand that curvature of the path of motion
is caused by an inward acting centripetal force, they can find it hard to accept
that the centrifugal force exists anyway due to the motion, independently of any
curvature or any centripetal force. In cases where a centripetal force has been
induced in a constraint by a moving object pushing or pulling against it, this
leads to an action-reaction pair across the two bodies, but the inertial centrifugal
force itself is never a reaction to a centripetal force as is often wrongly believed.
A concentric inertial pressure field surrounds all moving objects, and when
the pressure is symmetrical, a straight line inertial path will result. The magnetic
field around an electric current is a special case of the inertial field. The inertial
field is comprised of tiny aethereal whirlpools which naturally align along their
mutual rotation axes and trace out concentric rings around the path of motion.
These tiny whirlpools press against each other with centrifugal force while
striving to dilate and this pressure is the deeper physical cause that underlies all
kinematics and electromagnetic phenomena. The sea of tiny whirlpools serves
as the medium for the propagation of light.
References
[1] O’Neill, John J., PRODIGAL GENIUS, Biography of Nikola Tesla, Long Island, New York, 15th July 1944
http://www.rastko.rs/istorija/tesla/oniell-tesla.html
Long ago he (mankind) recognized that all perceptible matter comes from a primary substance, of a tenuity
beyond conception and filling all space - the Akasha or luminiferous ether - which is acted upon by the life-
giving Prana or creative force, calling into existence, in never ending cycles, all things and phenomena. The
primary substance, thrown into infinitesimal whirls of prodigious velocity, becomes gross matter; the force
subsiding, the motion ceases and matter disappears, reverting to the primary substance”.
[2] Whittaker, E.T., “A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity”, Chapter 4, pages 100-102, (1910)
“All space, according to the younger Bernoulli, is permeated by a fluid aether, containing an immense
number of excessively small whirlpools. The elasticity which the aether appears to possess, and in virtue of
which it is able to transmit vibrations, is really due to the presence of these whirlpools; for, owing to
centrifugal force, each whirlpool is continually striving to dilate, and so presses against the neighbouring
whirlpools.”
[3] Lodge, Sir Oliver, “Ether (in physics)”, Encyclopaedia Britannica,
Fourteenth Edition, Volume 8, Pages 751-755, (1937)
http://gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Historical%20PapersMechanics%20/%20Electrodynamics/Download/4105
In relation to the speed of light, The most probable surmise or guess at present is that the ether is a perfectly
incompressible continuous fluid, in a state of fine-grained vortex motion, circulating with that same enormous
speed. For it has been partly, though as yet incompletely, shown that such a vortex fluid would transmit waves
of the same general nature as light waves i.e., periodic disturbances across the line of propagationand
would transmit them at a rate of the same order of magnitude as the vortex or circulation speed”
[4] Clerk-Maxwell, J., “On Physical Lines of Force”, Philosophical Magazine, Volume XXI, Part I, page 171,
Equation (9), Fourth Series, London, (1861)
http://vacuum-physics.com/Maxwell/maxwell_oplf.pdf
4
[5] Tombe, F.D., “Pythagoras’s Theorem in Seven Dimensions (2018)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322559041_Pythagoras's_Theorem_in_Seven_Dimensions
[6] Tombe, F.D., “The Inertial Helicopter” (2017)
http://gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Research%20Papers-Gravity/Download/6856
[7] Tombe, F.D., “Magnetic Repulsion and the Gyroscopic Force” (2014)
http://gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Research%20Papers-Mathematical%20Physics/Download/6220
[8] Tombe, F.D., “The Double Helix and the Electron-Positron Aether” (2017)
http://gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Research%20Papers-Mechanics%20/%20Electrodynamics/Download/7057
... These vortices press against each other with centrifugal force while striving to dilate, and their mutual rotation axes trace out the prevailing magnetic lines of force. See "Straight Line Motion" and "The Significance of the Inertial Forces" [8], [9]. ...
... where ̂ is the unit vector in the transverse direction, and where θ̇ is the angular speed about the polar origin. Taking the time derivative again we obtain the expression for the particle's acceleration in the inertial frame, ̈=̈̂+θ̇̂+θ̇̂+ θ̈̂− θ̇2̂ (3A) 8 which can be rearranged as, ...
Article
Full-text available
Centrifugal force is a well-known concept. It is the familiar outward acting force that is induced in rotating systems. It has many practical applications in engineering, and its mathematical formula plays a crucial role in planetary orbital analysis. It is important therefore to investigate why the physics establishment shies away from embracing this concept to the full. We hear talk about centrifugal force not being a real force, or that it is merely an equal and opposite reaction to a centripetal force, or that it only exists in a rotating frame of reference, or that it doesn’t exist at all. This unfortunate attitude will now be investigated in full.
... When the inertial wind blows through a moving body, a mutual interaction occurs such that the tiny aethereal vortices align along their mutual rotation axes forming concentric solenoidal rings of force around the moving body, in the likeness of a magnetic field. This is in essence a disc-like centrifugal pressure field at right-angles to the direction of motion, [7]. Meanwhile the constituent atoms or molecules of the moving body itself are caused to precess with their precession axes aligned along the direction of the body's motion. ...
Article
Full-text available
The rattleback (Celtic stone) is the most mysterious phenomenon in classical mechanics. It freely undergoes a complete reversal of its angular momentum without the involvement of any apparent external torque. This mystery will now be investigated at the molecular level.
... The explanation for convectively induced centrifugal force is extrapolated from Maxwell's explanation for Ampère's Circuital Law, whereby the rotation axes of the tiny molecular vortices form concentric solenoidal rings of force around the path of motion of the electric current, [5], [8]. This constitutes a magnetic field, equivalent to a centrifugal force field. ...
Article
Full-text available
Centrifugal force is an inertial effect which is induced by motion through the Minkowski 4D space-time continuum. While it can act in opposition to gravity, there is evidence from Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, that gravity, if strong enough, can affect the physical structure of the 4D space-time continuum in such a way as to destroy the centrifugal force and convert it into an electrostatic force of attraction that augments the gravity. The physical nature of centrifugal force and the manner in which it can be altered by gravity will now be investigated.
... This interaction leads to the formation of vortex rings, concentric on the line of motion, and centred on the moving body. This will be the weak magnetic field associated with the Barnett effect and it will exist in conjunction with a gyroscopic stability in the atoms and molecules of the moving body, resulting in the uniform straight-line inertial path [6]. In the case of two bodies in relative motion, unless they are bonded to the luminiferous medium in the vicinity of their centrifugal force fields, then they will have no direct physical impact on each other, but in the case of planetary bodies undergoing orbital motion, their gravitational fields should be strong enough to entrain the luminiferous medium, hence transferring the physical interaction to the interface between the two gravitational fields. ...
Article
Full-text available
When a theory of electromagnetism promotes the idea that the medium for the propagation of light waves is an elastic solid comprised of electric particles, the question is always going to be asked as to why this medium would not generate friction in the planetary orbits, such as would cause the planets to spiral into the Sun. It would be impossible for a moving body to completely avoid any physical interaction with these electric particles, and so, in order to comply with Kepler’s Laws of Planetary Motion, this interaction must be the actual cause of the inertial forces, as opposed to being the cause of any dissipative friction.
... In this case though, the magnetic fields that are generated by the two moving charged particles will be the source of the centrifugal force. See the article "Straight Line Motion", [5], which explains how a magnetic field is in fact a centrifugal force field. The two magnetic fields will repel each other since the electron and the positron will be moving in opposite transverse directions*, and their mutual motion will become increasingly transverse as they approach each other. ...
Article
Full-text available
The purpose is to show that the equation E = mc^2 was already implicit in Maxwell's 1861 paper "On Physical Lines of Force" and that it doesn't mean that mass is equivalent to energy, but rather it relates to the propagation of electromagnetic radiation through a sea of rotating electron-positron dipoles which pervades all of space.
... This inertial pressure must be the same thing as kinetic energy, because we know that centrifugal force is the radial gradient of transverse kinetic energy. See the article "Straight Line Motion" [6]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The modern teaching is that centrifugal force only exists as a fictitious force in a rotating frame of reference, and that the only force acting in an inertial frame of reference when a body undergoes circular motion is an inward acting centripetal force. On the contrary however, it is here proposed that a rotating frame of reference, rather than creating a fictitious centrifugal force, actually masks the existence of a very real inertial centripetal force that has gone unrecognized in the literature. When the books are correctly balanced, it will be demonstrated that centrifugal force is a real force, closely related to kinetic energy, and observable in any frame of reference.
... As a mechanical body follows its straight-line inertial path, it will similarly induce the background dipolar vortices to angularly accelerate as it shears past them, while inducing a centrifugal force field akin to a weak magnetic field [9]. Conclusion VIII. ...
Article
Full-text available
This article follows on from the double helix theory of the magnetic field. A closer look will be taken at the relationship between electromagnetic radiation on the one hand and a magnetic field on the other.
Article
Full-text available
It will be argued that if Pythagoras’s Theorem can hold outside of three dimensions, then the only possibility might be in the special case of seven dimensions, but that even this would be highly doubtful.
Article
Full-text available
This article takes a closer look at the bonding and stability mechanisms within the electron-positron dipole sea and how these result in the double helix theory of the magnetic field. The physical connection between the inertial forces and magnetic repulsion will be further investigated.
Article
Full-text available
A sea level object that is moving horizontally at a speed greater than 8km/sec is already in orbit and it will rise upwards due to centrifugal force. Two such objects tethered together while moving in opposite directions should therefore spiral upwards like a helicopter. It will be proposed that the atom is a dipole, and that it is the fundamental helicopter.
Research
Full-text available
The counterintuitive gravity defying behaviour that is exhibited by a pivoted gyroscope suggests the involvement of an active spin-induced force, similar in nature to the magnetic force, F = qv×B. The phenomenon of gyroscopic stability exhibits a strong spin-induced reactance which cannot be accounted for by the moment of inertia alone. The physical connection between the inertial forces and magnetic repulsion will be investigated.