ArticlePDF Available

Future Work and Enterprise Systems

Authors:

Abstract

From its earliest days, research in business and information systems engineering (BISE) has been dedicated to envisioning how information technology will change the way we work and live. Today, technological innovation happens at a faster pace and reaches users more quickly than ever before. For example, while it took 75 years for the telephone to reach 100 million users, it was 16 years for mobile phones, 7 years for the World Wide Web, four and a half years for Facebook (Dreischmeier et al. 2015), and only a few weeks for Poke´mon GO (Moon 2016). The rapid acceleration of technological diffusion confronts BISE researchers, who usually study technological innovations from the perspective of socio-technical systems (Bostrom and Heinen 1977). Work systems are conceptualized as an interplay of tasks, technologies, and people (vom Brocke and Rosemann 2014), systems ‘‘in which human participants and/or machines perform work (processes and activities) using information, technology, and other resources to produce specific products/services for specific internal and/or external customers’’ (Alter 2013, p. 75). Against this background, much of the current discourse about future work systems addresses automation, as work is increasingly performed by machines. For example, blockchain and smart contracts can automate large parts of the supply chain (Mendling et al. 2018), and machine learning now facilitates automation in business areas that were once too unstructured for automation (Willcocks et al. 2015). In such settings, people are likely to contribute to work systems by means of creative work and exploration (as opposed to exploitation), a distinction that O’Reilly and Tushman (2013) referred to as organizational ambidexterity. Therefore, from the perspective of BISE research, the future of work poses questions about the interplay of people and machines, as Lehrer et al. (2018) outlined in their work on digital service innovation. In this discussion, we differentiate between the social intensity and the technical intensity of work and define four basic types of work systems, as shown in Fig. 1.
A preview of the PDF is not available
... Rather, the skills and abilities required to structure and process knowledge are gaining importance. Job profiles have thus shifted toward interdisciplinary, ambiguous, and creative tasks (vom Brocke et al. 2018). Educational institutions must evolve their curricula when it comes to the composition of skills and knowledge conveyed (Jung andLehrer 2017, Topi 2018). ...
Article
Full-text available
Argumentation is an omnipresent rudiment of daily communication and thinking. The ability to form convincing arguments is not only fundamental to persuading an audience of novel ideas but also plays a major role in strategic decision making, negotiation, and constructive, civil discourse. However, humans often struggle to develop argumentation skills, owing to a lack of individual and instant feedback in their learning process, because providing feedback on the individual argumentation skills of learners is time-consuming and not scalable if conducted manually by educators. Grounding our research in social cognitive theory, we investigate whether dynamic technology-mediated argumentation modeling improves students’ argumentation skills in the short and long term. To do so, we built a dynamic machine-learning (ML)–based modeling system. The system provides learners with dynamic writing feedback opportunities based on logical argumentation errors irrespective of instructor, time, and location. We conducted three empirical studies to test whether dynamic modeling improves persuasive writing performance more so than the benchmarks of scripted argumentation modeling (H1) and adaptive support (H2). Moreover, we assess whether, compared with adaptive support, dynamic argumentation modeling leads to better persuasive writing performance on both complex and simple tasks (H3). Finally, we investigate whether dynamic modeling on repeated argumentation tasks (over three months) leads to better learning in comparison with static modeling and no modeling (H4). Our results show that dynamic behavioral modeling significantly improves learners’ objective argumentation skills across domains, outperforming established methods like scripted modeling, adaptive support, and static modeling. The results further indicate that, compared with adaptive support, the effect of the dynamic modeling approach holds across complex (large effect) and simple tasks (medium effect) and supports learners with lower and higher expertise alike. This work provides important empirical findings related to the effects of dynamic modeling and social cognitive theory that inform the design of writing and skill support systems for education. This paper demonstrates that social cognitive theory and dynamic modeling based on ML generalize outside of math and science domains to argumentative writing.
... This, in turn, has the potential to transform the organizational context. As a result, IS has recently begun to explore the future of work and the distribution of capabilities between humans and AI (Dellermann et al., 2019;Dolata et al., 2019Dolata et al., , 2022Feuerriegel et al., 2020;Maedche et al., 2019;Seeber et al., 2020;vom Brocke et al., 2018). A better understanding of the division of labor mechanisms could contribute to a better understanding of human-AI collaboration regarding social impact, explainability, and performance. ...
... As a result and due to the rise in the usage of artificial intelligence (AI)-supported working environments among individuals worldwide, the field of computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW) has centered around novel and effective ways of supporting and instructing users with regards to the ever-changing landscape of working environments (e.g., research ranging from more established works [19,116] up to recent research considering the role of AI in CSCW [61,64,153]). Specifically, in collaborative work environments, interdisciplinary and creative tasks are becoming more relevant and demand higher-order thinking skills such as critical reasoning and problem-solving skills [131]. This shift of skills is a result of an ever-increasing amount of readily available data, entailing a shift in educational institutions, which need to equip learners with the necessary skill set for a future career and thus have to adapt their teaching methods and learning material. ...
Conference Paper
Providing argumentation feedback is considered helpful for students preparing to work in collaborative environments, helping them with writing higher-quality argumentative texts. Domain-independent natural language processing (NLP) methods, such as generative models, can utilize learner errors and fallacies in argumentation learning to help students write better argumentative texts. To test this, we collect design requirements, and then design and implement two different versions of our system called ALure to improve the students’ argumentation skills. We test how ALure helps students learn argumentation in a university lecture with 305 students and compare the learning gains of the two versions of ALure with a control group using video tutoring. We find and discuss the differences of learning gains in argument structure and fallacies in both groups after using ALure, as well as the control group. Our results shed light on the applicability of computer-supported systems using recent advances in NLP to help students in learning argumentation as a necessary skill for collaborative working settings.
... The strategy involves an orientation program on how to address these issues and the establishment of a preventive performance monitoring system designed to tackle performance problems as soon as they are detected so as not to interfere with ongoing processes. Brocke et al. (2018) pointed out that other practices, such as system updates and adaptive strategies, are relevant in a bid to maintain an organization's functions while incurring few hitches. ...
Article
Full-text available
Workflow automation plays a vital role in developing efficient government operations. Anchored on the Technology Acceptance Model, this descriptive-correlational study evaluated the efficiency of using automation tools in key work processes of a Philippine government agency. A census of the population was used to gather data from the 31 employees directly involved in the subject agency’s automation processes. Data were collected through a researcher-structured, validated questionnaire via Google Forms. These data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, weighted mean, multiple linear regression, ANOVA and Pearson r correlation analysis. The findings indicated that automation tools significantly enhanced the efficacy of key work processes in terms of speed, accuracy, and collaboration. Moreover, the study also revealed that employees are generally satisfied with performing routine and repetitive tasks because of the benefits of automation tools. However, the efficacy of key work processes is not significantly related to their overall job satisfaction. The study also revealed that the perceived impact of automation tools on key work processes is not affected by the demographic profile of the employees. This study also revealed that staff resistance and system integration issues are major barriers to the adoption of workflow automation. Furthermore, the study confirmed that there was no statistically significant correlation between perceived ease of use and problems encountered with automation tools. A strategic roadmap is proposed to improve workflow automation efficiency and address adoption-related challenges. This study also offers valuable insights for other government agencies seeking to introduce and assess similar technologies to enhance workflow and operational efficiency.
Article
Purpose The legal sports betting market in the United States has rapidly grown into a multi-billion-dollar industry. As a result, a secondary industry for sports betting recommendations has emerged. Because sports betting is widely considered as skill-based gambling, consumers may turn to experts for recommendations. While many sports betting recommendations come from humans, technological advances have enabled recommendations from artificial intelligence (AI). Therefore, we investigate how an AI versus human recommendation source affects consumer perceptions of expertise and subsequent likelihood to follow the sports betting recommendation. Design/methodology/approach We conducted three lab experiments, with three distinct undergraduate samples. We manipulated the recommendation source as either AI or human. We examined the impact of recommendation sources on consumer perceptions of expertise and subsequent likelihood to follow the sports betting recommendation via ANOVA, ANCOVA and the PROCESS macro. The collection of human data was performed according to the ethics standards established by the Declaration of Helsinki 2013 and was approved by the local Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects at the authors’ respective institutions. All participants gave informed consent prior to completing any experiment. Findings Across all lab experiments, we found that an AI (vs human) recommendation source decreased consumer perceptions of expertise and subsequent likelihood to follow the sports betting recommendation. Originality/value As the legal sports betting market continues to grow, both firms and consumers are investing in sports betting recommendations—including recommendations from AI. However, we are not aware of any research that examines sports betting recommendations from AI. We found that an AI (vs human) recommendation source decreased consumer perceptions of expertise and subsequent likelihood to follow the sports betting recommendation.
Article
Predictive maintenance represents a promising application of Artificial Intelligence in the industrial context. The evaluation and selection of predictive maintenance algorithms primarily rely on statistical measures such as absolute and relative prediction errors. However, a purely statistical approach to algorithm selection may not necessarily lead to the optimal economic outcome, as the two types of prediction errors are negatively correlated, thus, cannot be jointly optimized, and are associated with different costs. As the current literature lacks corresponding guidance, we developed a decision model for industrial full-service providers, applying an economic perspective to selecting predictive maintenance algorithms. The decision model was instantiated and evaluated in a real-world setting with a European machinery company providing full-service solutions in the field of car wash systems. Building on sensor data from 4.9 million car wash cycles, the instantiation demonstrates the applicability and effectiveness of the decision model with fidelity to a real-world phenomenon. In sum, the decision model provides economic insights into the trade-off between the algorithms’ error types and enables users to focus on economic concerns in algorithm selection. Our work contributes to the prescriptive knowledge of algorithm selection and predictive maintenance in line with the consideration of different types of cost.
Article
Employee support is a vital component for enterprise digital transformation, and a clearer understanding of its mechanism is crucial to the success of such transformation. Drawing upon the transactional theory of stress, we examine why employees (not) support enterprise digital transformation. A field study of 121 employees in a company undergoing digital transformation demonstrates that challenge and hindrance appraisals are two countervailing mechanisms that mediate the relationship between enterprise digital transformation and employee digital transformation support. The results further show that employees’ regulatory foci moderate the indirect effect of enterprise digital transformation on employee digital transformation support through their challenge or hindrance appraisal of the digital transformation. Specifically, employees with a higher promotion (prevention) focus are more likely to engage in challenge (hindrance) appraisal and support (not support) enterprise digital transformation. Our research has theoretical and managerial implications for employee management for enterprise digital transformation.
Conference Paper
The integration of digital technologies into the modern workplace has transformative implications for organizations and professionals. Digital business professionals, who play a central role in implementing digital tools, automation, and data-driven decision-making processes, are at the heart of these transformations. This qualitative study explores the main benefits and burdens of workplace digitalization as perceived by digital business professionals. Based on semi-structured interviews with 10 professionals from Austrian companies and qualitative content analysis, we identified 36 benefits grouped into 7 categories (e.g., task automation and process simplification) and 68 burdens grouped into 10 categories (e.g., the need for training and change management support). Our findings highlight the dual nature of workplace digitalization, emphasizing the need for proactive strategies to balance its benefits and burdens. By addressing these challenges, organizations can foster a harmonious coexistence between people and digital technologies, ensuring productivity and well-being in today's increasingly digitalized work environments.
Article
Full-text available
This paper reports on an exploratory, multisite case study of four organizations from the insurance, banking, telecommunications, and e-commerce industries that implemented big data analytics (BDA) technologies to provide individualized service to their customers. Grounded in our analysis of these four cases, a theoretical model is developed that explains how the flexible and reprogrammable nature of BDA technologies provides features of sourcing, storage, event recognition and prediction, behavior recognition and prediction, rule-based actions, and visualization that afford (1) service automation and (2) BDA-enabled human-material service practices. The model highlights how material agency (in the case of service automation) and the interplay of human and material agencies (in the case of human-material service practices) enable service individualization, as organizations draw on a service-dominant logic. The paper contributes to the literature on digitally enabled service innovation by highlighting how BDA technologies are generative digital technologies that provide a key organizational resource for service innovation. We discuss implications for research and practice.
Article
Full-text available
This article identifies Digital Work Design (DWD) as a research area and a (grand) challenge of business information systems engineering. Building on a thorough understanding of existing human work practices and the subsequent design and implementation of ICT artifacts, DWD reinstates the human worker at the core of information systems development efforts. This requires an integrated, interdisciplinary, participative, and agile approach, which allows identifying, analyzing, and supporting human work practices and their context in a predominantly digital environment. DWD aims to facilitate current and future work practices of employees through digital technologies. After identifying DWD’s roots in long-standing traditions of workplace studies, we elaborate its key characteristics. Next, we demonstrate through examples how DWD can be applied in manufacturing – from the initial data collection up to the iterative solution development cycle and possible outcomes. To conclude, we mention key points where DWD stands out from other approaches and present an outlook on the future in the form of research questions.
Article
Full-text available
In this study, we explore the role of Chief Digital Officer (CDO) through the perspectives of CDOs in thirty-five organizations. In enacting their emerging role, CDOs must navigate the existing institutionalized context of established information technology (IT) roles and respective jurisdictional claims. We find that CDOs intentionally draw on the term “digital” to distance themselves from existing executive roles in order to gain legitimacy. CDOs as institutional entrepreneurs take a focal role in both: (1) articulating and developing the emerging “digital” logic of action, and (2) enacting this digital logic through strategies such as grafting, bridging, and decoupling to navigate tensions between the existing and emerging approaches to innovation with digital technologies.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Digitalization gives rise to dynamic forces shaping future working structures. In practice, companies are increasingly interested in using their own employees as an internal crowd. Drawing on socio-technical systems (STS) perspective, organizations must understand how they can embed an internal crowdsourcing system effectively in order to exploit its potential. In particular, organizations need assistance in designing internal crowdsourcing systems. Thus, we follow an action design research approach and develop comprehensive design guidelines for designing an internal crowdsourcing system. The paper in hand develops the design guidelines by deriving the requirements from literature, developing them further in a bank project and evaluating them with external experts. Furthermore, we assess what tools can cover which part of the system and implement the system. The short paper will present the derived requirements, the first design of the internal crowdsourcing system and explain next steps of the full paper as well as the contribution.
Article
We develop and estimate a dynamic structural framework to analyze the social-media content creation and consumption behavior of employees within an enterprise. We focus, in particular, on employees’ blogging behavior. The model incorporates two key features that are ubiquitous in blogging forums: users face (1) a trade-off between blog posting and blog reading; and (2) a trade-off between work-related and leisure-related content. We apply the model to a unique data set comprising the complete details of the blog posting and reading behavior of employees over a 15-month period at a Fortune 1000 IT services and consulting firm. Despite getting a higher utility from work-related blogging, employees nevertheless publish a significant number of leisure posts. This is partially because the creation of leisure posts has a significant positive spillover effect on the readership of work posts. Counterfactual experiments demonstrate that leisure-related blogging has positive spillovers for work-related blogging, and hence a policy of abolishing leisure-related content creation can inadvertently have adverse consequences on work-related content creation in an enterprise setting. When organizations restrict leisure blogging, the sharing of online work-related knowledge decreases and this in turn can also reduce employee performance rating. Overall, blogging within enterprises by employees during their work day can have positive long-term benefits for organizations. This paper was accepted by Lorin Hitt, information systems.
Conference Paper
As information technologies (IT) are both, drivers of highly engaging experiences and sources of disruptions at work, the phenomenon of flow - defined as "the holistic sensation that people feel when they act with total involvement" [5, p. 36] - has been suggested as promising vehicle to understand and enhance user behavior. Despite the growing relevance of flow at work, contemporary measurement approaches of flow are of subjective and retrospective nature, limiting our possibilities to investigate and support flow in a reliable and timely manner. Hence, we require objective and real-time classification of flow. To address this issue, this article combines recent theoretical considerations from psychology and experimental research on the physiology of flow with machine learning (ML). The overall aim is to build classifiers to distinguish flow states (i.e., low and high flow). Our results indicate that flow-classifiers can be derived from physiological signals. Cardiac features seem to play an important role in this process resulting in an accuracy of 72.3%. Hereby, our findings may serve as foundation for future work aiming to build flow-aware IT-systems.
Conference Paper
Despite the increasing importance of digitization for economy and society, there is few structuring of the very heterogenous kinds of digital work. Representatives from business, politics and science need a basis for the development of strategies to encounter the challenges that result from this digitization. We aim at delivering a contribution to that basis by systematically investigating what different types of digital work exist and by developing a taxonomy. As a first important step towards this goal, we investigate in this paper what digital work tools exist since such tools are a major constituent element of digital work. Using a hybrid approach including both a deductive conceptual-to-empirical and an in-ductive empirical-to-conceptual procedure, we create an artifact that gives business leaders an overview of existing digital work tools as a basis for strategic decisions and at the same time provides researchers with stimuli for future investigations in the dynamic domain of digital work.
Article
Research Summary: This study introduces the notion of attention allocation in networks to argue that individuals with different types of network structure produce good ideas via different pathways. Using survey data on communication networks at a software company, we find that people with highly constrained networks generate good ideas by following a logic of interrogation, by which they focus their attention on information from a particular contact. Conversely, individuals with less constrained networks produce good ideas by following a logic of recombination, whereby they divide their attention to information coming from across multiple contacts. The results show that in highly constrained networks, interrogation is a more reliable pathway to good ideas than recombination. We discuss the implications of these findings for behavioral strategy, social networks, and innovation. Managerial Summary: People can develop good ideas when they recombine diverse information inputs shared by non‐redundant communication partners that span multiple local clusters. But, in an organization, most individuals are embedded in constrained networks of people who know each other and thus typically receive redundant information from work colleagues. This study suggests that they can innovate via a different pathway: through interrogation. We find that people who focus their attention on information coming from a particular person succeed at generating good ideas because they deeply interrogate local knowledge and develop domain‐specific insights.