Content uploaded by Holley Moyes
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Holley Moyes on Jun 26, 2020
Content may be subject to copyright.
ARYS -
A, R S
V N:
SILVIA ALFAYÉ VILLA ED.
DIRECTOR
J A E
(Universidad Carlos III de Madrid)
SECRETARIO
J R C G
(Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia)
R A
Biblioteca de la facultad de Humanidades
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
C/ Madrid, 135
28903 Getafe (Madrid) ESPAÑA
E-Mail: imuro@db.uc3m.es
Tlfno: 916 24 92 07
COMITÉ CIENTÍFICO
R A
(Universidad Babe-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca)
J B
(University of Edimburg)
N B
(École Pratique des hautes études à Paris)
C B
(Université Toulouse II)
A G
(Univ. Franche Comte)
M J H V
(Universidad de Salamanca)
R L
(Universita degli Studi di Peruggia)
F M S
(Universidad de Zaragoza)
J N
(University College London)
D P S
(Universidad Complutense de Madrid)
M T
(Università della Calabria, Cosenza;
Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei)
H S. V
(University of Leiden)
CONSEJO DE REDACCIÓN
M M M S
(Universidad de Cantabria)
J I S V G
D A
(Universidad de Oviedo)
A D M
(Universidad Autónoma de Madrid)
A I
(Universidad del País Vasco)
R R R
(Universidad de Castilla La Mancha)
J L L C
(Universidad de Almería)
Reservados todos los derechos.
No se pueden hacer copias por ningún
procedimiento electrónico o mecánico,
incluyendo fotocopias, o grabación
magnética o cualquier almacenamiento de
información y sistemas de recuperación
sin permiso escrito de los escritores.
ARYS: Antigüedad, Religiones y Sociedades
gura indizada en CIRC, Dialnet, DICE, ERIH
PLUS, Interclassica, Latindex, MIAR, RESH. So-
bre la política de la revista e instrucciones para
los autores, ver últimas páginas del volumen.
El precio anual de la subscripción
es de 18€ (individual) y 30€ (instituciones).
Para subscripciones fuera de España el precio
es de 30$ (individual) y 50$ (instituciones).
Toda la correspondencia para subscripción,
permisos de publicación, cambios de dirección
y cualquier otro asunto debe dirigirse a:
SUBSCRIPCIONES
DISEÑO Y MAQUETACIÓN
Syntagmas (www.syntagmas.com)
&%*5"
Volumen 14- 2016 - ISSN: 1575-166X
Depósito Legal M-32333-2014
%ZLJOTPO4-XXXEZLJOTPODPN
*OTUJUVUPEF)JTUPSJPHSBGÓB
+VMJP$BSP#BSPKB
6OJWFSTJEBE$BSMPT***EF.BESJE
"TPDJBDJØO"3:4
PRÓLOGO
T :
Silvia Alfayé Villa (Universidad de Zaragoza)
MONOGRÁFICO
E :
Francisco Diez de Velasco (Universidad de La Laguna)
C :
, (.
V-II ...)
Carmen Rueda Galán y Juan Pedro Bellón Ruiz (Universidad de Jaén)
N -
7
23
43
V N:
81
109
153
C . L ‘’ -
R
José A. Delgado Delgado (Universidad de La Laguna)
L :
R
Silvia Alfayé Villa (Universidad de Zaragoza)
F E
Clelia Martínez Maza (Universidad de Málaga)
X, L M:
Holley Moyes (University of California, Merced))
VARIA
U
M G A B
Daniel Sánchez Muñoz (Universidad de Granada)
RECENSIONES
MI, G: A Family of Gods: e Worship of the Imperial
Family in the Latin West. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 2016.
Carmen Alarcón Hernández (Universidad de Sevilla)
171
193
223
A, , [-] -
X, L M:
X, P F:
C A M U
R
Las cuevas eran un elemento desta-
cado de la cosmología maya que encar-
naban el inframundo de Xibalba. Como
describe el mito, su propio nombre sig-
nica “lugar del miedo o el terror”. Aún
así, los antiguos mayas se adentraban
en la obscuridad de las cavernas para
celebrar rituales destinados a divinida-
des asociadas con la lluvia, la fertilidad,
y los ominosos Señores del Inframun-
do. Aunque se ha escrito poco sobre las
prácticas rituales del período maya clá-
sico, los artefactos encontrados en las
Holley Moyes
U C, M
@.
A
Caves were a salient feature of Maya
cosmology that instantiated the under-
world of Xibalba. Described in myth,
its very name meant the place of fear
or fright. Yet, ancient people journeyed
deep into the darkness to conduct ritu-
als for deities associated with rain, fer-
tility, and the ominous Lords of the Un-
derworld. Although little was written
about ritual practices in the Classic pe-
riod, the artifact record attests that an-
cient people le oerings of ceramics,
household items, incense, jewelry and
://././.. - A, , [-] -
P
Xibalba, religión maya, topografía del
miedo, cueva, inframundo, ritual, cos-
mología maya, mito, ofrendas.
Fecha de recepción: 08/11/2016
K
Xibalba, Maya Religion, Fearscape,
Cave, Underworld, Ritual, Maya Cos-
mology, Myth, oerings.
Fecha de aceptación: 30/07/2017
H M
cuevas documentan que los antiguos
mayas dejaron ofrendas de cerámicas,
objetos domésticos, incienso, joyería,
y en ocasiones también víctimas sacri-
ciales, para los poderosos seres que
habitaban los espacios subterráneos. De
hecho, estas cuevas poseen todavía una
consideración sagrada entre las actuales
comunidades mayas, lo que atestigua la
resiliencia de la religion y la cosmología
mayas, así como el poder del mito.
sometimes sacricial victims for the
powerful beings that inhabited caves.
ese sites are still considered sacred in
Maya communities today, a testament
to the resilience of Maya religion and
cosmology and the power of myth.
A, , [-] -
“en went One Hunahpu and Seven Hunahpu, gui-
ded by the messengers as they descended along the path
to Xibalba. ey went down steep steps until they came
out again upon the banks of turbulent river canyons”.
Popol Vuh
1.
T M of their world as a three-tiered universe,
consisting of a sky creating the dome of the heavens, the four-sided earth that is the
abode of humans and the world beneath the earth-the netherworld2. e earth itself
oats on a watery base, oen associated with the underworld. Connecting the three
levels is the axis mundi or center of the universe, usually represented by a tree whose
branches are in the sky, whose trunk rises through the earth and whose roots spring
from the underworld. In the Quiché Mayan language, the netherworld was referred
to as Xibalba, the “place of fear”3 or “place of fright”4, Maya peoples in the Yucatan
peninsula refer to the underworld as Metnal or of “place of the dead”5. erefore, the
underworld is characterized as a watery place beneath the earth associated not only
with fear and death, but the life-giving properties of plants that spring from the earth
itself, like the world tree.
e sky, the earth, and the underworld were all homes to deities. Ancestors
inhabited the sky. Benecent deities, mischievous or dangerous spirits lived in cre-
1. Translated by CHRISTENSON, A. J: Popol Vuh: e Sacred Book of the Maya, Norman, 2007.
2. FREIDEL, D., SCHELE, L., and PARKER, K.: Maya Cosmos: ree ousand Years on the Shaman’s
Path, New York, 1993; THOMPSON, J.E.: Maya History and Religion, Norman, 1970, 195; BASSIE-
SWEET, K.: From the Mouth of the Dark Cave: Commemorative Sculpture of the Late Classic Maya,
Norman, 1991; EAD.: At the Edge of the World: Caves and Late Classic Maya World View, Norman, 1996.
3. CHRISTENSON: Popol Vuh…, 114.
4. MILLER, M.E., and TAUBE, K.: e Gods and Symbols of Ancient Mexico and the Maya: An Illus-
trated Dictionary of Mesoamerican Religion, 1993, London, 177.
5. MACLEOD, B., and PULESTON, D: “Pathways into Darkness: e Search for the Road to Xibal-
ba”, GREENE ROBERTSON, M., and JEFFERS, D.C. (eds.), Tercera Mesa Redonda de Palenque, Vol. 4,
Monterrey, 1978, 71-77 (71).
X, P F
A, , [-] -
vices and canyons, and the underworld was the home of the dreaded Lords of the
Underworld who were the bringers of death and disease described in the ancient
Maya creation myth, the Popol Vuh. Although considered to be a Postclassic docu-
ment, Preclassic Maya iconography suggests that the mythic creation narratives of
the text date as far back as 100BCE6, and may have deeper antiquity as evidenced
in the monuments at Izapa in the piedmont area of Guatemala7. e earliest known
hieroglyphic version was rst translated into Spanish orthography in the 16th cen-
tury, probably no later than CE 1558. Between CE 1701 and 1703, a Spanish priest,
Francisco Ximénez, copied the text and added his Spanish translation8.
Based on the Popol Vuh as well as on ethnographic accounts reported by J. Eric
omson9, archaeologists B. MacLeod and D. Puleston were the rst to argue that
the ancient Maya conceptualized caves as entrances to the underworld10. e mythic
pages of the Popol Vuh describe a journey of two pairs of Hero Twins and their des-
cent to Xibalba, arguably through the mouth of a cave. e rst set is a man and his
brother and the second set are his twin sons. In the story, the twins are summoned to
the underworld to play ball with evil lords of death and disease. e lords have names
such as One and Seven Death, Gathered Blood, Pus Demon, Jaundice Demon, Skull
Sta and Bloody Teeth to name a few11. e rst set of twins lose the game and are sa-
criced by the evil lords, but aer many trials and tests, the second set of twins defeat
the lords and destroy their power over humans. ey resurrect their father who arises
as the Maya maize deity, but remains to dwell in the underworld. eir acts clear the
way for the universe to be set into motion, the sun to rise, and the stars to begin their
journey across the sky12.
In this paper, I illustrate that among the ancient Maya, caves were thought of
as underworld places as well as transitional spaces beneath the earth that were, and
in many traditional communities today still are, conceptualized as some of the most
sacred features of the natural landscape. Archaeological research as well as ethno-
graphic accounts demonstrate that caves were not spaces to be revered from afar, but
places where humans could propitiate and placate both benecent and dangerous
deities. e archaeological record attests to their use among the ancient Maya, and
6. SATURNO, W.A., ET AL.: e Murals of San Bartolo, El Petén, Guatemala, Part 1: e North Wall,
Ancient America No. 7, Barnyardsville, 2005.
7. See for discussion GUERNSEY, J.: e Performance of Rulership in Mesoamerican Izapan Style Art,
Austin, 2006, 96-102.
8. CHRISTENSON: Popol Vuh…, 35-42.
9. THOMPSON: Maya History....
10. MACLEOD and PULESTON: “Pathways into Darkness…”, 71-77.
11. CHRISTENSON: Popol Vuh….
12. FREIDEL, SCHELE and PARKER.: Maya Cosmos….
H M
A, , [-] -
elaborate architectural modications at some sites suggest that they served as salient
backdrops for large public ceremonies.
Caves as Entrances to the Underworld
ough the Popol Vuh never mentions caves specically, D. Stuart argues that Clas-
sic period glyphic associations for ancient Maya caves contain elements such as the
skull, bone, and mandible invoking death and underworld aliations13. One cave
glyph is drawn as a detached eye within a half-darkened eld, looking out of a cave
(Figure 1). is is interesting because it suggests this outward-looking perspective.
e ancient Maya tended to be very practical and many of their iconographic depic-
tions as well as their beliefs were based on real-world characteristics of their environ-
ment. For instance, not only among the Maya, but in all of Mesoamerica, entrances
into the earth are depicted as giant anthropomorphic gaping mouths with teeth. is
anthropomorphic entity, called the witz, which is depicted an animated mountain14,
is discussed further below.
One of the best Maya examples of this is from the San Bartolo (Guatemala)
murals on the north wall. ese murals were very well -preserved and dated to ap-
proximately 100BC15 (Figure 2). e gures in the painting are staged within an
anthropomorphic mouth complete with a fang hanging from the top that is clearly
a stalactite. Any caver can attest that at the entrances to many caves, stalactites hang
along the drip lines. When viewed from the interior, this resembles the upper teeth
of a giant mouth. In this photo of Actun Isabella in western Belize, the resemblance
of a giant creature with a wide open maw is uncanny as one looks out from the cave’s
interior (Figure 3). is perspective, as suggested in the Maya cave glyph, is the kind
of real-world observation that was clearly not lost on ancient people.
ere are numerous ethnographic accounts that relate caves with the un-
derworld. In his work in Momostenango in highland Guatemala, G. Cook16 reports
that caves represent the entrance to the underworld and are inhabited by the human
dead and liminal beings from other world orders or past creations. Working in the
13. See VOGT, E.Z., and STUART, D.: “Some Notes on Ritual Caves Among the Ancient and Modern
Maya”, BRADY, J.E, and PRUFER, K.M. (eds.), In the Maw of the Earth Monster: Mesoamerican Ritual
Cave Use, Austin, 2005, 155-185 (157-159).
14. STUART, D.S.: “e Hills are Alive: Sacred Mountains in the Maya Cosmos”, Symbols, 14, 1997,
13-17.
15. SATURNO ET AL.: e Murals of San Bartolo….
16. COOK, G.: “Quichean Folk eology and Southern Maya Supernaturalism”, GOSSEN, G.H. (ed.),
Symbol and Meaning Beyond the Closed Community: Essays in Mesoamerican Ideas, New York, 1986, pp.
139-154 (154).
X, P F
A, , [-] -
same area, B. Tedlock found that the underworld is “an evil location that is entered by
human beings at death, through a cave, or the standing waters of a lake or ocean”17.
A. Christenson also working in highland Guatemala argues that today, caves are con-
ceptualized as portals to the “other world,” which is the domain of ancestors, saints
and deities18.
While there are clear associations between caves and entrances to the Maya
underworld, caves are also envisioned by many Maya peoples today as places related
to the earth and earth deities. erefore, based on ethnographic analogies primarily
from highland Guatemala, some archaeologists19 have discounted their underworld
aliations. However, as Scott acknowledges20, it is likely that there is considerable
disjunction between the highland Guatemalan groups studied and the Classic period
Maya. Also, to understand how cave space is conceptualized in Maya cosmologies
we need to revisit our understanding of the three-tiered universe. We tend to forget
that in traditional Maya thought one does not move directly between the earth and
sky or earth and underworld, but both the sky and the underworld are comprised of
many levels. erefore, there are transitional zones that are traversed when moving
between the earth and the mythical realms. is is well reported ethnographically
but has been somewhat ignored by archaeologists. To name a few examples, J. E.
ompson21 writes that the sky was thought to have 13 layers and the underworld
composed of 4 steps descending from the earth’s western horizon to a h level. is
is reminiscent of the journey of the Hero Twins in which they descend “stairs” on
their way to Xibalba. e Tzotzil of Chamula22 envision the sky as having three con-
centric layers and the underworld as a single layer supported by Miguel, the Earth
Bearer. Caves are considered part of the earth, though they are associated with water,
dampness, darkness, and lowness, suggesting that they are in fact transitional zones
between the middle world and the underworld. Nearby, the Tzotzil Maya of Larraín-
17. TEDLOCK, B.: Time and the Highland Maya. Revised Edition, Albuquerque, 1992, 173.
18. CHRISTENSON, A.: “Places of Emergence: Sacred Mountains and Cofradía Ceremonies”, STA-
LLER, J.E. (ed.), Pre-Columbian Landscapes of Creation and Origin, New York, 2008, 95-121 (108).
19. BRADY, J.E., and PRUFER, K.M.: “Maya Cave Archaeology: A New Look at Religion and Cos-
mology”, PRUFER, K.M., and BRADY, J.E. (eds.), Stone Houses and Earth Lords: Maya Religion in the
Cave Context, Boulder, 2005, 365-380; BRADY, J.E., and PRUFER, K.M.: “Introduction: A History of
Mesoamerican Cave Interpretation”, BRADY, J.E., and PRUFER, K.M (eds.), In the Maw of the Ear-
th Monster: Mesoamerican Ritual Cave Use, Austin, 2005, 1-18; SCOTT, A.M.: Communicating with
the Sacred Earthscape: An Ethnoarchaeological Investigation of Kaqchikel Maya Ceremonies in Highland
Guatemala, unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, 2009.
20. SCOTT: Communicating with the Sacred…, 190.
21. THOMPSON, J.E.: Maya History…, 195.
22. GOSSEN, G.H.: Chamulas in the World of the Sun: Time and Space in a Maya Oral Tradition,
Cambridge, 1974, 21.
H M
A, , [-] -
zar23 understand the sky to have 13 levels and the underworld 9. Humans live in the
bottom two levels of the sky and earth deities are located within the sky’s lowest level.
Both earth and underworld deities live in caves. e ninth level of the underworld
constitutes Olontik or the “Land of the Dead”. So, in these modern accounts, Earth
deities appear to be associated with the more supercial areas, whereas underworld
denizens would be expected to reside primarily in lower levels24.
Cave as the Homes of Deities
A number of dierent deities are associated with caves today that can be traced di-
rectly to the Classic period. For instance, among the Q’eqchi’ of Alta Verapaz, the
in-dwelling earth spirits or Tzuultaq’a (meaning literally “mountain valley”), thought
to be protector deities, are propitiated deep within caves, which are conceptualized
as their “houses”25. Ethnographer R. Wilson26 later points out that mountains are
thought of as living beings (yo’yo), a point corroborated by S. Garza who was told that
caves are “alive”27. is belief likely has classic period antecedents. e Maya glyph
for mountain has been deciphered as witz or wits and is represented iconographically
as an anthropomorphic being with large eyes and a cle of cracked head28. D. Stuart
argued that these symbols, which oen adorn pyramids, mark them as anthropomor-
phic mountains. He noted that royal burials within these sacred articial mountains
created an ancestral landscape of power as a backdrop for royal public ritual. Entran-
ces to the inner sanctums of pyramids are oen marked with the toothy mouth of the
cave illustrated by the entrance to Building II at Chicanna (Figure 4a) and the Temple
of the Magician at Uxmal in Yucatan or at Temple 22 at Copan, Honduras (Figure
4b) reinforcing the ideological nexus of caves, mountains and ancestral beings. is
also helps to explain why caves are oen depicted as the homes of ancestral beings.
For instance, there are a set of polychrome vases from the classic period that depict
a couple in a cave with crossed legs that some refer to as “dancing.” J. Nielsen and J.
23. HOLLAND, W.: Highland Maya Folk Medicine: A Study of Culture Change, unpublished disserta-
tion, University of Arizona, Tucson, 1962, 94-96.
24. HOLLAND: Highland Maya Folk…, 126-133.
25. WILSON, R.: Mountain Spirits and Maize: Catholic Conversion and Renovation of Traditions among
the Q’eqchi’ of Guatemala, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of London, London, 1990, 69, 98.
26. WILSON, R.: Maya Resurgence in Guatemala: Q’eqchi’ Experiences, Norman, 1995, 53.
27. GARZA, S.: “An Ethnoarchaeological Approach to Maya Caves”, paper presented at the 68th An-
nual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Milwaukee, 2003, unpublished.
28. STUART: “e Hills are alive…”, 15.
X, P F
A, , [-] -
Brady29 as well as others30 suggest that the couple is in fact copulating and that this is a
fertility symbol that refers to ancestral emergence of humans from caves. ough not
copulating, similar couples are also pictured within the eyes of the animated moun-
tain known as the witz discussed above31. e eyes of the mountain, like the mouth
of the cave provide windows into the earth and the spirits that inhabit these realms
can be viewed within.
Rain deities are also thought to dwell in caves. is well-illustrated for the Clas-
sic period Maya where Chac the rain deity is depicted sitting in his cave/house on a
Classic period vase32 (Figure 5a). Depictions of Chac seated in his cave are also found
in two of the last surviving Maya books, the Dresden Codex on pages 30a and 67b33
and the Madrid Codex pages 29 and 7334. Additionally, there are iconographic de-
pictions from the Maya Classic Period that illustrate Chac, the rain god sitting in his
cave. A reied example of this is found at the cave of La Pailita in Guatemala where
a life-sized sculpture of Chac sits on his throne in the cave’s interior (Figure 5b)35. As
a corollary to this, it is reported ethnographically among the Tzotzil that clouds are
thought to form inside of mountains and emerge from caves36. Again, this is a notion
that is played out in the natural environment. In fact, clouds do at times emerge from
caves as mist. I witnessed this on the summer solstice in 2014 when a cloud literally
emerged from the mouth of the cave at Las Cuevas in Belize (Figure 6).
ere are also explicit associations with caves and the Maya maize god. e
mythology in the Popol Vuh clearly states that the resurrected maize deity is le to
dwell in the underworld, which may help to explain Classic period iconography. In
the San Bartolo mural illustrates a woman handing tamales to the maize deity who
stands with a gourd of water in hand. is suggests a scene of primordial sustenance
to K. Taube and his colleagues37. In the Late Classic period a series of vases illustrate
29. NIELSEN, J., and BRADY, J.E.: “e Couple in the Cave: Origin Iconography on a Ceramic Vessel
from Los Naranjos, Honduras”, Ancient Mesoamerica, 1, 2006, 203-217.
30. STONE, D.: e Archaeology of Central and Southern Honduras. Papers of the Peabody Museum of
American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Vol. 49, No 3, Cambridge, 1957.
31. STUART: “e Hills are alive…”, 16; VOGT and STUART: “Some Notes on Ritual Caves…”, 155-
185.
32. COE, M.: Lords of the Underworld, Princeton, 1978, 78, no. 11.
33. BASSIE-SWEET: From the Mouth…, 91-95.
34. BASSIE-SWEET: At the Edge…, 98-103.
35. GRAHAM, I.: “Discovery of a Maya Ritual Cave in Peten, Guatemala”, Symbols, 1997, 28-31.
36. THOMPSON: Maya History…, 267-272; VOGT, E.Z.: Zinacantan: a Maya Community in the
Highlands of Chiapas, Cambridge, 1969, 387; VOGT and STUART: “Some Notes on Ritual Caves…”,
164-165.
37. SATURNO ET AL.: e Murals of San Bartolo….
H M
A, , [-] -
the maize god springing from the v-shaped element in the head of the witz illustra-
ting his emergence from a cle in the mountain.
So, in sum we nd that in Classic period epigraphy and iconography there are
deities and mythic events associated with caves, and that in some traditional commu-
nities today, caves are still considered sacred spaces where rituals take place to both
honor deities that dwell within the earth or to ask the spirits for special favors. is
helps explain why caves were used in Classic period rituals, but there is little in the
ancient written sources that speaks directly to specic rituals occurring in caves38.
What does seem clear is that there were many dierent rituals associated with caves
and that the archaeological record itself provides some of the best evidence for un-
derstanding ancient Maya cave use.
Cave Use in the Classic Period
In the Maya area, there is some evidence that hunter/gatherers entered and explored
deep caves, but there are no clear signs of ritual use prior to the Early Preclassic pe-
riod (1100-650 BCE). ere are co-occurrences of stone and bone tools with Pleisto-
cene animal bone at Loltún Cave in northern Yucatan39 that may date between 40,000
and 15,000 years ago, and Pleistocene mammal bones have also been found in Actun
Halal, associated with early crude lithics40. However, the earliest known ritual cave
use in the Maya Lowlands comes from the site of Chechem Ha (Poisonwood Water)
in western Belize, Central America. e cave exhibits thick layers of charcoal from
human use and a small accumulation of ceramic sherds beginning between 1100-
1300 BCE when the very rst settlers of the Belize Valley made day-long pilgrimages
to the site41. ese villagers made their way to the center of the cave and conducted
rites beneath a huge stalactite chandelier hanging above a pool of water. is was the
38. HELMKE, C.G.B.: Ancient Maya Cave Use as Attested in the Glyphic Corpus of the Maya Lowlands
and the Caves of the Roaring Creek Valley, Belize, unpublished dissertation, University College of Lon-
don, London, 2009, 523.
39. VELÁZQUEZ VALADÉZ, R.: “Recent Discoveries in the Cave of Loltun, Yucatan, Mexico”, Mexi-
con, 2, 1980, 53-55.
40. GRIFFITH, C.: “Excavations and Salvage Operations in Actun Tunichil and Actun Uayazba Kab,
Roaring Creek Valley, Belize”, AWE, J.J. (ed.), e Western Belize Regional Cave Project: A Report of the
1997 Field Season, Durham, 1998, 37-70; LOHSE, J.C., and COLLINS, M.B.: Lithic Artifacts Recovered
in Association with Pleistocene Fauna from the Actun Halal Cave, Western Belize, manuscript on le with
the Western Belize Regional Cave Project and Institute of Archaeology, Belmopan, 2004.
41. MOYES, H.: e Sacred Landscape as a Political Resource: A Case Study of Ancient Maya Cave Use
at Chechem Ha Cave, Belize, Central America, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New
York at Bualo, 2006; EAD.: “e Archaeology of Chechem Ha Cave, Belize: A Late Classic Hiatus in
Usa ge”, Research Reports in Belizean Archaeology, 3, 2006, 225-234.
X, P F
A, , [-] -
focus of ritual cave use for almost 400 years before they began using other parts of
the cave. Chechem Ha exhibited continuous usage from this early time until the Ter-
minal Classic period sometime prior to 960CE, when according to the radiocarbon
dates, the entrance was blocked o until it was rediscovered in 1989.
In a study of 28 sites throughout Belize42, the Belize Cave Research Project
found that there is a gradual increase in the number of caves used over time cul-
minating in the Late Classic period (700-900 CE). e uorescence of ancient cave
use occurs in the Late-Terminal Classic period (700-950CE), and frequency of use
drops o abruptly in tandem with what is referred to as the “Maya Collapse.” e
collapse was a period in the Late Classic period in which societies in the eastern
lowlands underwent major social changes including the fall of kingships and severe
population reduction43, which has been demonstrated in the paleoclimate records to
coincide with a megadrought44. e increase in the number of caves being used and
concurrent changes in ritual practice suggest that caves became the focus of a Late
Classic drought cult during this stressful time45. In the northern lowlands in Yucatan,
the pattern is dierent and cave use is continuous through to and during the Colonial
Period46, whereas Postclassic and Colonial use is rare elsewhere.
In many cases, we nd that cave use predates human occupation of a region. For
instance, at Chechem Ha, the cave was used hundreds of years before structures were
built on the surface and the valley occupied. is pattern is noted in extensive cave
surveys such as K. Prufer’s work in the Maya Mountains of Belize47 and D. Rissolo’s
42. MOYES, H., KOSAKOWSKY, L., and RAY, E.: e Chronology of Ancient Maya Cave Use in Belize.
Research Reports in Belizean Archaeology, 14, Belmopan, 2017.
43. DEMAREST, A.A., RICE, P.M., and RICE, D.S.: “e Terminal Classic in the Maya Lowlands:
Assessing Collapse, Transition, and Transformation”, DEMAREST, A.A., RICE, P.M., and RICE, D.S
(eds.), e Terminal Classic in the Maya Lowlands: Collapse, Transition, and Transformation, Boulder,
2004, 545-572.
44. KENNETT, D., ET AL.: “Development and Disintegration of Maya Political Systems in Response
to Climate Change”, Science, 338, 2012, 788-791.
45. MOYES, H., ET AL.: “e Ancient Maya Drought Cult: Late Classic Cave Use in Belize”, Latin
American Antiquity, 20, 1, 2009, 175-206.
46. ANDREWS, E.W.I: Balankanche, rone of the Tiger Priest, New Orleans, 1970; BROWN, C.T.:
“Caves, Karst, and Settlement at Mayapán, Yucatán”, BRADY, J.E., and PRUFER, K.M. (eds.), In the Maw
of the Earth Monster: Mesoamerican Ritual Cave Use, Boulder, 2005, 373-402 (391); RISSOLO, D.A.:
Ancient Maya Cave Use in the Yalahau Region, Northern Quintana Roo, Mexico, Riverside, 2001; ID.:
“Beneath the Yalahau: Emerging Patterns of Ancient May Ritual Cave Use from Northern Quintana
Roo, Mexico”, BRADY, J.E., and PRUFER, K.M. (eds.), In the Maw of the Earth Monster: Mesoamerican
Ritual Cave Use, Boulder, 2005, 342-372; STONE, A.: Images from the Underworld: Naj Tunich and the
Tradition of Maya Cave Painting, Austin, 1995, 54-55.
47. PRUFER, K.M.: Communities, Caves, and Ritual Specialists: A Study of Sacred Space in the Maya
Mountains of Southern Belize, Ph.D Dissertation, Southern Illinois University, 2002.
H M
A, , [-] -
study of caves in the Yalahau Region of Yucatan48. In our study of caves surrounding
the site of Uxbenkà in southern Belize49, Keith Prufer and I suggest that Kayuko Naj
Tunich (Canoe Cave) is tied to settlement based on its early dates and architectural
modications. We argue that the site was a “foundational” shrine that served to le-
gitimate early rulers and establish their ties with the land by propitiating the indwe-
lling deities. Our work is supported by a number of ethnohistoric studies, the most
notable of which was conducted by A. García-Zambrano50 who investigated early
Spanish land titles to understand how indigenous boundaries were established and
maintained. He found that in deciding where to settle, immigrants sought an ideal
location based on cosmological principles that mirrored the three-tiered universe
of the cosmos creating a primordial landscape where earth’s fundamental elements
interacted. e most sought-aer landscape consisted of a valley surrounded by four
mountains, one in each cardinal direction, irrigated by water holes, rivers, lakes, and/
or lagoons. A h mountain, ideally containing springs and caves located in the cen-
ter, protruded in the middle of the valley. Within the central mountain, a natural
cave containing water provided the water used for community rituals. e special
function of caves in ideal cosmological landscapes helps to explain why cave sym-
bols are oen incorporated into Classic period place names (toponyms) or politically
charged emblem glyphs representing Maya political realms51.
e sacred landscape is oen represented in the built environment and in archi-
tectural placement. ere are a number of instances where pyramidal structures were
constructed over cave entrances52. For instance, at the site of Dos Pilas, Guatemala53,
the royal palace complex was built above the Cave of the Bats (Cueva de Murciéla-
gos). e cave served as an outlet for an entire drainage system of the site, so that
during heavy rains water gushed from the mouth of the cave with such force that the
roar could be heard half a kilometer away. J. Brady and his colleagues suggested that
48. RISSOLO: Ancient Maya Cave…
49. MOYES, H., and PRUFER, K.M.: “e Geopolitics of Emerging Maya Rulers: A Case Study of
Kayuko Naj Tunich, a Foundational Shrine at Uxbenká, Southern Belize”, Journal of Anthropological Re-
search, 69, 2, 225-248; MOYES, H., ROBINSON, M., and PRUFER, K.M.: “e Kayuko Mound Group:
A Festival Site in Southern Belize”, Antiquity, 90, 349, 2016, 143-156.
50. GARCÍA-ZAMBRANO, A.J.: “Early Colonial Evidence of Pre-Columbian Rituals of Foundation”,
ROBERTSON, M.G., and FIELD, V. (eds.), Seventh Palenque Round Table, 1989, San Francisco, 1994,
217-227.
51. STUART, D.S.: Cave References in Maya Inscriptions, manuscript on le, Department of Anthro-
pology, Harvard University, 1999; VOGT and STUART: “Some Notes on Ritual Caves…”, 155-185.
52. See for discussion MOYES, H., and BRADY, J.E.: “Caves as Sacred Space in Mesoamerica”, MO-
YES, H. (ed.), Sacred Darkness: A Global Perspective on the Ritual Use of Caves, Boulder, 2012, 151-170.
53. BRADY, J.E. ET AL.: “Glimpses of the Dark Side of the Petexbatun Regional Archaeological Pro-
ject: e Petexbatun Regional Cave Survey”, Ancient Mesoamerica, 8, 1997, 353-364.
X, P F
A, , [-] -
this was a sensory cue that announced the beginning of rainy season, the purpose of
which was to reify the power and control of the king over life giving water. J. Brady
and W. Ashmore54 suggest that this is a prime example of one of the mountain/cave/
water complex, one of the most salient features of Mesoamerican cosmology that re-
ferences the three-tiered model of the universe in which the pyramid represents the
sacred mountain and water the underworld.
e mountain/cave/water complex is also manifest at the Classic Period site of
Las Cuevas in the Mountain Pine Ridge in western Belize55. Here one of the site’s lar-
gest temple constructions (Temple 1) sits directly atop a large natural cave (Figure 7).
e entrance is accessed by a pathway that leads down into a dry cenote or sinkhole.
Within the cathedral-like entrance chamber is a natural perennial spring that lls
with water during heavy rains. Stairways descend to the pool and cut stone blocks
line the water hole. Monumental architecture including rooms and terraces surround
the spring attesting to its ritual importance. e constructions surrounding this natu-
ral feature create a strong cosmological statement and a salient venue for large public
performances.
In Yucatan at the site of Mayapán, settlement is dictated by the karstic landscape
and the location of cenotes (sinkholes) and caves56. ese karstic features are thought
to be integral to social organization. Additionally, the Temple of Kukulcan, arguably
the most important architectural feature at the site was built at the edge of a cenote
lled with water and a cave ran beneath the temple57. Excavations revealed death
imagery modeled in stucco on the southeast corner of the temple’s substructure, the
corner of the building nearest the cenote. ese features are likened to the three-
tiered universe with clear underworld associations.
54. BRADY, J.E., and ASHMORE, W.: “Mountains, Caves, Water: Ideational Landscapes of the An-
cient Maya”, ASHMORE, W., and KNAPP, A.B. (eds.), Archaeologies of Landscapes: Contemporary Pers-
pectives, Oxford, 1999, 124-145.
55. DIGBY, A.: “A New Maya City Discovered in British Honduras at Las Cuevas and an Underground
Necropolis Revealed”, e London Illustrated News, 232, 1958, 274-275; MOYES, H.: “Constructing the
Underworld: e Built Environment in Ancient Mesoamerican Caves”, BRADY, J.E. (ed.): Heart of Ear-
th: Studies in Maya Ritual Cave Use, Austin, 2012, 95-110; MOYES, H., ET AL.: “Dreams at Las Cuevas:
A Location of High Devotional Expression of the Late Classic Maya”, Research Reports in Belizean Ar-
chaeology, 12, 2015, 239-249.
56. BROWN: “Caves, Karst…”, 373-402.
57. BROWN: “Caves, Karst…”, 391.
H M
A, , [-] -
Cave Assemblages
Classic period assemblages inside of caves support interpretations of caves as un-
derworld venues as well. Human remains found in caves connote clear underworld
associations with death. Human bone is found in many, perhaps most, caves and may
be classied as burials, sacrices, and problematic deposits such as single non-arti-
culated bones. Burials may be single or multiple, elite or non-elite58. ey can range
from rare royal tomb internments such as those found at Naj Tunich cave in Guate-
mala59, to ossuaries that contain large numbers of scattered bone such as the Preclas-
sic cemetery located in Gordon’s Cave 3 at the site of Copan in Honduras60. ere are
a number of examples of rockshelters that appear to be used as cemeteries primarily
for local non-apical elite or commoners. For example, almost 200 individuals accom-
panied by grave goods were found in the Caves Branch rockshelter in Belize61. Single
non-articulated bones or teeth are perhaps the most commonly featured class.
Sacricial victims can also be found in caves and cenotes. Entire skeletons lac-
king graves goods are found in the depths of a number of caves. One example is in
the Main Chamber in Actun Tunichil Muknal in western Belize62. e cave contains
an interior water source and a river must be traversed to reach the chamber located
over 500m from the cave entrance. e chamber dates to the end of the Late Clas-
sic period based on two almost identical AMS dates (2-δ Calib. A.D. 710-950, A.D.
720-960). Distributed throughout the 4,450 m2 chamber are 15 skeletons and several
58. SCOTT, A.M., and BRADY, J.E.: “Human Remains in Lowland Maya Caves: Problems of Inter-
pretation”, PRUFER, K.M., and BRADY, J.E. (eds.), Stone Houses and Earth Lords: Maya Religion in the
Cave Context, Boulder, 2005, 263-284.
59. BRADY, J.E.: An Investigation of Maya Ritual Cave Use with Special Reference to Naj Tunich, Peten,
Guatemala, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 1989; STONE: Images from the
Underworld….
60. BRADY, J.E.: “A Reassessment of the Chronology and Function of Gordon’s Cave #3, Copan, Hon-
duras”, Ancient Mesoamerica, 6, 1995, 29-38.
61. GLASSMAN, D.M., and BONOR, J.L.: “Mortuary Practices of the Prehistoric Maya from Caves
Branch Rock Shelter, Belize”, PRUFER, K.M., and BRADY, J.E. (eds.), Stone Houses and Earth Lords:
Maya Religion in the Cave Context, Boulder, 2005, 285-296; WROBEL, G.D.: “Report on the Caves
Branch Rockshelter Excavations: 2006 and 2007 Fields Seasons”, HELMKE, C.G.B., and AWE, J.J. (eds.),
e Belize Valley Archaeological Reconnaissance Project: A Report of the 2007 Field Season, Belmopan,
2008, 1-19.
62. GIBBS, S.A.: “Human Skeletal Remains from Actun Tunichil Muknal and Actun Uayazba Kab.”,
AWE, J.J. (ed.), e Western Belize Regional Cave Project: A Report of the 1997 Field Season, Department
of Anthropology Occasional Paper, 1, Durham, 1998, 71-92; EAD.: An Interpretation of the Signicance
of Human Remains from the Caves of the Southern Maya Lowlands, Master’s esis, Trent University,
Trent, 2000; LUCERO, L.J., and GIBBS, S.A: “e Creation and Sacrice of Witches in Classic Maya
Society”, TIESLER, V., and CUCINA, A. (eds.): New Perspectives on Human Ritual Sacrice and Ritual
Body Treatments in Ancient Maya Society, New York, 45-73.
X, P F
A, , [-] -
unarticulated bones that may represent a 16th. Of these 14 were located by the Wes-
tern Belize Regional Cave Project. Due to the cave’s high humidity the bones were in
poor condition but did allow for some analyses by S. Gibbs63. Of the 13 she analyzed,
ve were children under the age of three years, two were sub-adults, and the remai-
ning six were adults ranging in age from their early 20’s to approximately 40. Of the
adults, two were likely to be female and three, possibly four, male. Not one of the 13
individuals were “buried” but all of the bodies were located on the cave’s surface. Ele-
ven of the 14 were placed in intermittent pools suggesting that water was an integral
element in the sacricial rites.
Archaeological caves sites have yielded enormous artifact assemblages that
may include organic remains due to the sometimes excellent preservation in caves.
For instance, at Chechem Ha cave in Belize small corn cobs were found inside of
a large jar64. ese were identied and “rst fruits” attesting to agricultural rituals
performed at the site. Animal bones are a common nd as well though their ritual
signicance is unclear. Mary Pohl makes a good argument based on ethnohistori-
cal, ethnographic, and iconographic data that cuch or renewal rites related to the
accession of rulers may have occurred in caves and suggests that it is evidenced by
deer bones found in some assemblages65. However, one might argue that the bones
are a result of hunting rites66.
One of the most common objects placed with oerings in caves are spe-
leothems or dripstone formations. roughout the Maya area there is speleothem
breakage, movement, caching, and removal67. Brady argues that they are objects
of power that contain a powerful essence similar to Polynesian mana. is is har-
dly surprising considering that the Yucatec term for speleothems is xix ha tunich or
“drip-water stone”68 indicating that the Maya conceived of stalactites and stalagmites
as having been formed from water that was “suhuy” or ritually pure.
Caves may also contain a wide variety of objects such as jewelry, spindle whorls,
celts (stone ax heads), stingray spines, lithics, crystals, grinding stones, and pyrite
mirrors69, and may produce unique nds. For instance, in Petroglyph Cave a snake
63. GIBBS: “Human Skeletal…”, 71-92; EAD.: An Interpretation of the….
64. MOYES: e Sacred Landscape...
65. POHL, M.: “Ritual Continuity and Transformation in Mesoamerica: Reconstructing the Ancient
Maya Cuch Ritual”, American Antiquity, 46, 1981, 513-529.
66. BROWN, L.A.: “Planting the Bones: Hunting Ceremonialism at Contemporary and Nineteenth-
Century Shrines in the Guatemalan Highlands”, Latin American Antiquity, 16, 2005, 131-146.
67. BRADY, J.E. ET AL.: “Speleothem Breakage, Movement, Removal, and Caching: An Aspect of
Ancient Maya Cave Modication”, Geoarchaeology, 12, 6, 1997, 725-750.
68. BARRERA VÁSQUEZ, A.: Diccionario Maya Cordemex, Merida, 1980, 946.
69. MOYES, H.: e Cave as a Cosmogram: e Use of GIS in an Intrasite Spatial Analysis of the Main
Chamber of Actun Tunichil Muknal, A Maya Ceremonial Cave in Western Belize, M.A. thesis, Florida
H M
A, , [-] -
skeleton was found propped up on a speleothem, possibly the only occurrence of its
kind70. But, despite the number of exotic items that may be associated with caves, the
bulk of cave assemblages are composed of household items, primarily ceramics71.
Cave ceramic assemblages possess unique properties. For instance, most objects
in caves are highly fragmentary and may have been ritually smashed and the pieces
stacked or scattered within a small area. is has been well-documented in the sys-
tematic study at Actun Tunichil Muknal72, a cave with little subsurface sedimenta-
tion. In situ retting demonstrated that the farthest a sherd fell from its associated
sherds was 5 m. In many cases, sherds were stacked together and placed in niches or
small alcoves73. Although many vessels could be retted they were invariably missing
fragments suggesting that some sherds were removed from the cave. Brady simi-
larly noted that when retting vessels at Naj Tunich, some portion of the vessel was
always missing74. Also, single sherds were brought into the cave as oerings in and of
themselves. Sherd scattering events are a hallmark of Late Classic caves use and are
found at almost every site in that time period. For instance, at the cave at Las Cuevas,
32,000 sherds were found scattered on the oor concentrated in Chambers 2 and 3.
ese had been trampled, imbedding them into the clay matrix of the oor forming
a “sherd carpet.”
Not only ceramics, but almost all artifacts in cave assembles exhibit some kind
of breakage, however small or large. Some light may be shed on this practice by tur-
ning to the Popol Vuh. At the end of the story, aer defeating the evil Lords of the Un-
derworld, the triumphant twins threaten to kill the people of the underworld, but ins-
tead decide to spare their lives and chastise them by limiting the oerings that were
able to receive from humans. e punishment was that oerings could only consist of
“… scabrous nodules of sap… just griddles, just gourds, just brittle things broken to
pieces”75. Bearing these words in mind, it should come as no surprise that oerings
le for deities in an underworld setting such as a cave, should be fragmentary.
Atlantic University, Boca Raton, 2001; PRUFER, K.M.: Communities, Caves, and Ritual Specialists: A
Study of Sacred Space in the Maya Mountains of Southern Belize, Ph.D Dissertation, Southern Illinois
University, Illinois, 2002, 626-627.
70. REENTS-BUDET, D., and MACLEOD, B.: e Archaeology of Petroglyph Cave, Cayo District, Be-
lize, unpublished manuscript in author’s possession, 1997.
71. BRADY, J.E, and PETERSON, P.A.: “Re-envisioning Ancient Maya Ritual Assemblages”, FOGE-
LIN, L. (ed.), Religion, Archaeology, and the Material World, Illinois, 2008, 78-96.
72. MOYES.: e Cave as a Cosmogram….
73. MOYES: e Cave as a Cosmogram…, 73-75.
74. BRADY.: An Investigation of Maya Ritual…, 86.
75. TEDLOCK, D.: Popol Vuh: e Denitive Edition of the Mayan Book of the Dawn of Life and the
Glories of the Gods and Kings, New York, 1996, 138.
X, P F
A, , [-] -
Conclusion
When we consider Maya cosmology and belief, it becomes apparent that caves are
one of the most sacred places for the ancient Maya. is paper has presented only a
limited synthetic compilation of what has been learned about cave use over the last 40
years. is overview demonstrates that caves functioned as ritual spaces for the ear-
liest settlers and were important sacred features of the landscape that inuenced site
planning and social organization. Caves functioned as underworld spaces in the rei-
cation of Mesoamerican cosmological principles and the embodiment of mytholo-
gical narratives. e archaeology of caves provides insight into how the ancient Maya
conceptualized these spaces as the homes of deities, both evil and benecent where
these beings could be propitiated. e archaeological record demonstrates that caves
were used as multi-purpose ritual venues ideally suited for earth-based rites such as
rain, fertility, and renewal ceremonies. eir netherworld associations were made
manifest by ritual practices occurring within caves and in their use as repositories for
human remains. e mythic associations with the trials of the twins from the Popol
Vuh and the sacrice of humans deep within caves further enforces their underworld
connections. rough ethnography, epigraphy, iconography and the archaeological
record, we have a good understanding of the Maya underworld and its complex role
in Maya thinking, cosmology, and the lives of ancient Maya people.
H M
A, , [-] -
X, P F
L F
F . Ancient Maya glyph meaning och
ch’een “enters the cave” illustrates the cave sym-
bol as an eyeball looking out from the darkness
(aer VOGT and STUART: “Some Notes on
Ritual Caves…”, 161, drawn by D. Stuart).
F . Image from the north wall of the San Bartolo murals
illustrating the maize deity standing before a cave entrance. A
woman hands out tamales and the maize deity hold a gourd of water
(SATURNO ET AL.: e Murals of San Bartolo…).
A, , [-] -
H M
F . Cave opening of Actun Isabella in western Belize resem-
bles a giant open toothy maw (photograph by author).
F . a) Photograph of temple façade of Structure II, Chicanna (Getty Ima-
ges); b) Drawing of reconstructed façade Temple 22 Copan (drawing by N. Allen in
collaboration with J. Schwerin in SCHWERIN, J.: “e Sacred Mountain in Social
Context. Symbolism and History in Maya Architecture: Temple 22, at Copan, Hon-
duras”, Ancient Mesoamerica, 22, 2011, 271-300 (283)).
A, , [-] -
X, P F
F . a) Chac the rain deity is depicted sitting in his cave/house on
a Classic period vase (COE: Lords of the Underworld, 78, no.11); b) A
life-sized sculpture of Chac sits on a throne inside the cave of La Pailita in
Guatemala (GRAHAM: “Discovery of a Maya…”).
F . A cloud emerges from the cave at Las Cuevas on the
summer solstice in 2014 (photo courtesy of the Las Cuevas
Archaeological Reconnaissance).
A, , [-] -
F . Artistic rendering of the cave at Las Cuevas that sits below
an eastern pyramid (drawing by Mesa Schumacher, courtesy of the Las
Cuevas Archaeological Reconnaissance).
H M
A, , [-] -
