We propose a framework for routing protocols in wireless multi-hop Networks (WMhNs). In
this framework we model, simulate and compare impact of link availability probability , path
stability and route stability. For this analysis, we select most widely used routing three reactive
protocols; AODV, DSR, DYMO and three proactive protocols; DSDV, FSR and OLSR. Number
of connections, number of nodes (node density) and relative velocity of nodes are the performance
evaluation parameters. A novel contribution of this work is to improve the efficiency of protocols
as MOD-AODV, MOD-DSR, MOD-DYMO, MOD-FSR and MOD-OLSR. The comparison-based
on simulation of both default and modified routing protocols is carried out under the performance
parameters; Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), Average End-to-End Delay (AE2ED) and Normalized
routing Overhead (NRO). Further we analyze the impact of both factors; routing protocols (default
and modified) and node density in performance parameters using 2k Factorial method that how they
are affecting them with different variations. From extensive simulations, we observe that MODDSR,
DSR, MOD-DYMO and DYMO outperform all the remaining routing protocols in terms of
link availability probability, path duration and route stability at the cost of higher values of NRO.
While analyzing with 2k Factorial method, it is observed that MOD-DSR and DSR performing
good enough by showing higher values in PDR, whereas low values in AE2ED at the cost of high
value of NRO. For the simulation work we use Network Simulator NS-2 and Matlab to verify the
results observed from NS-2.
Content may be subject to copyright.