Few could deny that the body is a site of intense scrutiny and debate in the contemporary world. Neoliberal frameworks invest a set of meanings and obligations in the body, policing and politicizing it, rendering it usable in myriad ways beyond the physical. Meanwhile complex arguments about power and the ever-more devolved rhetoric of surveillance make autonomy and empowerment endlessly more complex. Traditional studies of screen culture and power invariably include Laura Mulvey's seminal work on the gaze (1975). Varied responses and re-readings have resulted in meaningful work on other forms of the gaze; the female gaze, the oppositional gaze, the matrixial gaze and others, each rejecting the totalizing categories of previous incarnations. This collection approaches the complex and unstable surveillant gaze; the gaze at and within the digital screen, where bodies, arguably most often those of women, are subjugated by being broken down into data, into knowable and quantifiable components. The very term "digital" refers to the breakdown of the body into digits , numbers and code. Digital data can be replicated with complete accuracy the infallible reproduction can be seen to be symbolic of a lack of authenticity, of meaning, and of the random quirks of individual life. Endless reproduction renders digital life both replaceable and meaningless while simultaneously investing digital life with new meanings. The central-ity of the terrified body to many of these digital narratives suggests new forms of terror and angst, where bodies are subjected to an endless knowing look. As Julia Leyda states "the cameras are superior, all-seeing witnesses that cannot intervene, and force us also to witness helplessly" (2016). The increased privatization of modes of consumption affects viewing experiences and introduces new and meaningful interstices. Not least of these is a power disruption where individual platform users engage in different Introduction 2 ways with the film image. The new digital prosumer, to use Alvin Toffler's (1980) term, consumes and produces content at the same time, and this co-creation which is facilitated by the digital image is open to use and misuse and the further creation of power systems far beyond the male gaze. From "Visual Pleasure" to "Digital Dreams" The various contributions in the collection approach contemporary iterations of the "gaze" and the peculiarly modern phenomena of voyeur-ism as it is experienced through digital technology. In the past decades, vast volumes of work have developed Mulvey's original work; feminist, psycho-analytical, structuralist, semiotic and anti-essentialist theories have excavated the representation of bodies onscreen and the ubiquity of dead or terrified women onscreen. This collection attempts to tease out some of the nuances of contemporary iterations of power as they are played out on digital screens, and contemporary narratives. It examines how the digital realm might engage the active/passive dichotomy in new ways. The particular perils of the digital age can be seen on, by, and through screen bodies as they are made, remade, represented, and used. If the body is now seen as a source of knowledge, that knowledge can be excavated either by digital means, monitoring practices or techno-interference. Privacy, autonomy and freedom now haunt screen depictions of bodies. As such, authenticity and objective testimony are continually challenged. The essays here tease out the machinations of voyeurism in the digital age and the realization of power through digital visual forms. Much work has been done on and via digital feminisms, by which digital and virtual formats enable activism and theory. While the digital realm facilitates feminism for the digital age, there is still much work to do in unpacking the interrelation between body politics at the micro and macro level and to address what Oliver (2017) terms the male gaze's "symptomatic psychic delusions of possession and control." The digital format can be seen to buttress this delusion by allowing the distortion of the image; all that is needed is ownership of a device. Sarah Banet-Weiser claims that today feminism is limited by capitalism; the neo-liberal feminism is based on ever expanding markets, which create spaces for women and indeed foreground them while at the same time they negate larger actions by focusing on the individual. Many of the essays within this collection attest to this devolving of women's autonomy through and within the digital realm, alongside the noticeable lack of large-scale action. As Banet-Weiser has noted, "a crucial Introduction (Flynn) 3 component of popular feminism has been to call attention to rape culture, to reveal its pervasive and normative presence" (2018: 55). This normative presence can be felt within the digital realm, where ownership and the act of viewing create a potential synergy of violence, voyeurism and power. This collection is not intended to be a feminist text per se, not to engage in distinctly feminist approaches; many volumes of theory have already covered much of this ground. Instead this collection focuses on the critical edges, on the intersections of film theory and various theoretical lenses. In the spirit of the times, this work aims to be inclusive, by including a range of academics at varying career points from a variety of backgrounds and geographical locations. It celebrates established and unestablished voices using various disciplinary approaches to tease out some of the nuances around the digital screen and its history of violence and voyeur-ism, and it questions whether historical depictions of female bodies have changed in this new digital era. New screens encroach on life as never before, handheld or in pockets, purses and schoolbags, in waiting rooms and planes, in potentially every room in our home, available at a touch. The potential to freeze-frame and expand, to disrupt the screen body presents distinct possibilities in regard to the power of and over the image. As Rombes (2017) observes, "the mobility of the screen erodes the boundary between the place of dreams and everyday life." In order to critically address some of the changes wrought upon screen culture by the information age, by computerization and dig-itization, it is necessary to examine questions of technological power and agency, technological determinism and social constructivism. While digital effects play a sizeable role in contemporary entertainment, we must consider digital effects' function in sustaining a number of ideologies and/or myths, particularly around the gaze, voyeurism and power structures. In many contemporary genres, digital effects are coupled with narratives of fear and violence. These iterations of the digital call for new and nuanced critiques of contemporary screen bodies. The essays within this collection therefore seek to offer critical comments on the somatic solutions offered by cinema. The various scholars in this collection map how power has been iterated on and by the screen, and the ways that this has developed in the digital age. It is hoped that by examining how cultural productions depict the act of watching others, of being voyeurs to violence and power, of power regimes and engagement with power, this collection will open new routes for discussion. Our current moment in history, seen by many as a time of social and political crisis, renders such conversations vitally important. The