Content uploaded by Palash Dutta
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Palash Dutta on Sep 26, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
DOI: 10.4018/IJITSA.2018070103
Volume 11 • Issue 2 • July-December 2018
Copyright © 2018, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
31
Soumendra Goala, Dibrugarh University, Didrugarh, India
Palash Dutta, Dibrugarh University, Dibrugarh, India
This article describes how serial crimes are very interesting for study in the absence of proper and
solid evidence. From a high volume of criminal cases of similar types, it is difficult to detect the
crimes that were committed by the same offender or not. The process of linking of crimes which
were committed by the same offender or offenders is called Crime Linkage Analysis. In this article,
a new hesitant fuzzy distance measure has been introduced and a fuzzy multicriteria decision-making
approach has been proposed to help Crime Linkage Analysis, which enables us to find to what extent
a pair of crime shares a common offender or offenders.
Crime Linkage, Fuzzy MCDM, Hesitant Fuzzy Distance Measure, Hesitant Fuzzy Set
The objective of crime linkage analysis is to analyze a group of crimes and to find the crimes linked to
each other by a common offender or co-offenders. In the presence of sufficient evidence like forensic
evidence, DNA or fingerprints or proper digital evidence, the task of linking of crimes becomes nearly
certain. But in the absence of such kind of information, the process of linkage analysis becomes a
difficult task.
Every person is different from the other in psychological level. During a crime, an offender
makes decision consistently for target selection, site selection, time selection etc. The actions of the
offender are influenced by his behavior, psychological view, and past experience. For this reason,
each and every action of an offender is a reflection of his or her personality. Whatever is the situation
there should be some similarities between two crimes committed by the same offender due to the
behavior of the offender, called behavioral linkage. An offender may commit two crimes differently
if they are presented similar situation, although some basic similarities will be there. There are three
basic assumptions for crime linkage analysis (Bennell et al. 2005; Goodwill 2006; Grubin et al. 2001;
Woodhams et al. 2007):
1. Although criminal acts differently in different situations, some basic behavioral variables remain
consistent in all crimes.
2. As every person is different from each other by personality, there is some distinctiveness of
behavior of different criminals.
3. The behavior of criminal can be observed, measured, recorded, and coded.
Volume 11 • Issue 2 • July-December 2018
32
The process for crime linkage analysis has the steps of collection and processing of data which
includes collection of data from the crime scenes and coding of the physical description of the
scene and behavior of the offender (Woodhams, Bull, & Hollin, 2007). For example, location of the
scene, timing, used technique, and victim’s characteristics have to be coded in an appropriate way
to interpret logically. After coding the crimes, they are compared depending on the behavioral or
situational variable.
In practical two crimes were never found to be identical. That is why the terms similarity or
distinctiveness between two crimes are itself uncertain. Sometimes proper information is not found
at the crime scenes. Therefore, the mathematical interpretation of such kind of information is not
certain most of the time and hence fuzzy in nature. In this paper, a fuzzy MCDM approach has been
introduced to help crime linkage analysis by linking crimes pairwise from a collection of crimes.
The crimes have been represented by hesitant fuzzy set in terms of evidence, as it has the efficiency
to cope with the uncertainty that comes into play due to missing information and different pieces of
evidence’s different level of interpretation.
Basically there are two approaches in multi-criteria decision making problems (a) multiple
attribute decision making (MADM), in which decision has to be taken in discrete space and focused
on how to select different alternatives from existing alternatives and (b) multiple objective decision
making (MODM) in which decision has to be taken in continuous apace and several objective
functions are to be achieved simultaneously. The concept of the fuzzy set theory was first introduced
by Zadeh (1965). Then Bellman and Zadeh (1970) and Zimmerman (1978) gave an approach to
multi-criteria decision making using fuzzy sets. Yager (1978) illustrated that in fuzzy multi-criteria
decision making (FMCDM), the best alternatives have the highest membership grades. Saaty (1980)
developed Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Later Saaty (1996) developed Analytical Network
Process (ANP). Fan et al. (2002) proposed a new approach to solve the MADM problems. Hawang
and Yoon (1981) developed TOPSIS, the technique where similarity is measured to ideal solutions.
Liang (1992) presented FMCDM on the basis of an ideal solution and anti-ideal solution. Then Yoong
and Hawang (1995) proposed the advance fuzzy TOPSIS procedure. Later due to the flexibility and
reliability of the TOPSIS procedure it is developed and used gradually. These are some MADM
approaches used for decision making under fuzzy environment most of the time. Similarly, Fuzzy
Linear programming, Goal Programming, mixed integer programming are some example of MODM
approaches.
Many Researchers discussed crime prevention, prediction in serial crime and linkage analysis
from the background of Fuzzy Mathematics. Queck et al. (2001) introduced a pseudo outer product
based fuzzy neural network (POPFNN), which detects similarity between two fingerprints and decide
whether they belong to the same person or not. Grubestic (2006) used fuzzy clustering to detect
crime hot-spot in a city. Sheng et al. (2010) gave an intelligent decision support system to uncover
the crime pattern and relationship between the pattern with police duty deployment using fuzzy
time series analysis and fuzzy self-arranging map network. Nurul et al. (2012) gave an analysis to
detect most crime potential area using AHP approach, combining with the geographical information
system. Stofel et al. (2012) introduced a fuzzy clustering based approach to detect a pattern of crime
data from original forensic data. Shrivastav et al. (2012) used fuzzy time series to make a prediction
of crime. Albertetti et al. (2013) used Multi-attribute utility theory (MADM) approach to crime
linkage analysis in high volume crimes. Adeyiga et al. (2016) proposed a fuzzy clustering technique
for criminal profiling to provide investigator an intelligent system to detect and prevent crime. The
fuzzy system is used to identify the trait of an individual. Gupta et al. (2015) took five different
characteristics like economic status, family background, educational level, alcoholic or drug addict
and criminal history for mapping of crime potential areas with the help of fuzzification and after
defuzzification, the value helps in detecting crimes.
18 more pages are available in the full version of this
document, which may be purchased using the "Add to Cart"
button on the product's webpage:
www.igi-global.com/article/a-fuzzy-multicriteria-decision-
making-approach-to-crime-linkage/204602?camid=4v1
This title is available in Computer Systems and Software
Engineering Collection - e-Journals, e-Journal Collection,
Library Science, Information Studies, and Education e-
Journal Collection, Computer Science, Security, and
Information Technology e-Journal Collection, Engineering,
Natural, and Physical Science Discipline e-Journal
Collection, Education Knowledge Solutions e-Journal
Collection, Computer Science and IT Knowledge Solutions e-
Journal Collection. Recommend this product to your librarian:
www.igi-global.com/e-resources/library-
recommendation/?id=163
Related Content
Imagination in Creative Design: Towards Conceptual Clarification and
Integration around the Key Notion of Insight Moments
Stefan Wiltschnig (2013). Multidisciplinary Studies in Knowledge and Systems
Science (pp. 79-94).
www.igi-global.com/chapter/imagination-creative-design/76223?camid=4v1a
Negotiating Knowledge Gaps in Dispersed Knowledge Work
Rashmi H. Assudani (2011). International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations
(pp. 1-21).
www.igi-global.com/article/negotiating-knowledge-gaps-dispersed-
knowledge/55598?camid=4v1a
The Role of Citizen Science in Environmental Education: A Critical
Exploration of the Environmental Citizen Science Experience
Ria Ann Dunkley (2017). Analyzing the Role of Citizen Science in Modern Research
(pp. 213-230).
www.igi-global.com/chapter/the-role-of-citizen-science-in-environmental-
education/170191?camid=4v1a
Agile Alignment of Enterprise Execution Capabilities with Strategy
Daniel Worden (2010). Knowledge Management Strategies for Business
Development (pp. 45-62).
www.igi-global.com/chapter/agile-alignment-enterprise-execution-
capabilities/38462?camid=4v1a