ArticlePDF Available

Illegal pangolin trade in the Philippines

Authors:
  • Monitor Conservation Research Society

Figures

No caption available
… 
Content may be subject to copyright.
TRAFFIC Bulletin Vol. 30 No. 1 (2018) 37
S H O R T R E P O R T
preliminary study of the pangolin trade in the Philippines
by Schoppe and Cruz (2009), much of the trade in the
Philippine Pangolin is localised to meet demand for food
and for use in traditional medicine. They also revealed,
to a lesser extent, some international trade which is
suspected to be destined for Malaysia, from where it
then enters tracking chains to East Asia. However,
in general, there is very little documented data on the
exploitation of animals in Palawan, or to what extent
trade feeds a domestic or international market, let alone
the impact trade is having on the species’s population
(Cruz et al., 2007). The Philippine Pangolin is protected
in the Philippines which means no trade or hunting of
the species is allowed, not even by indigenous groups
for food or traditional medicine (Schoppe and Cruz,
2009). Similarly, as an Appendix I-listed species under
the Convention on International Trade in Endangered
Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) all international
commercial trade in wild-caught specimens is prohibited.
This study documents all known illegal trade of the
Philippine Pangolin through an analysis of seizures that
have occurred between 2001 and 2017 as well as through
anecdotal observations of trade in the country.
Methods
Seizure data for the period 2001–2017 were extracted
from a variety of sources, including unpublished PCSD
apprehension reports, Department of Environment and
Natural Resources (DENR), TRAFFIC publications, open
source media, the CITES Trade Database, grey literature
and from several non-governmental organisations in
the Philippines. All records involving the Philippines
as a known origin, transit point or end destination were
Introduction
Pangolins are currently among the most heavily-
tracked mammals in the world (Newton et
al., 2008; Challender and Waterman, 2017).
Persistent demand continues to put pressure on
all eight extant pangolin species (Challender,
2011; Challender and Hywood, 2012; Gomez et al.,
2016a; Nijman et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2016). At least
67 countries and territories across six continents were
implicated in the tracking of pangolins between 2010
and 2015 indicating the global scale of illegal trade
and the associated threat to pangolins (Heinrich et al.,
2017). Pangolins are especially sought after in Africa and
Asia for their meat and scales, with the latter used for
traditional medicinal purposes (Wu et al., 2004; Wu and
Ma, 2007; Zhang and Yin, 2014; Nijman, 2015; Gomez
et al., 2016a, 2016b), while their meat is consumed as
a luxury dish or local source of protein (Mohapatra et
al., 2015; Shairp et al., 2016). As pangolin populations
in China and in neighbouring countries in South-east
Asia have dwindled over recent decades, harvesting
for the trade has moved southwards across the Asian
continent, with Malaysia and Indonesia currently among
the most important regional suppliers in international
tracking (Semiadi et al., 2009; Sopyan, 2009; Tuuga,
2009; Challender, 2011, IUCN SSC Pangolin Specialist
Group, 2016; Gomez et al., 2017). Increasingly there has
also been some shift in trade from Asian species (likely
due to dwindling populations) to African species, with
intercontinental trade records involving large quantities
of pangolin scales (i.e. several tonnes) (Challender and
Hywood, 2012; Challender et al., 2016; Gomez et al.,
2016a; Heinrich et al., 2017; Hung and Chung, 2018).
The Philippines is home to one species of pangolin,
the Philippine or Palawan Pangolin Manis culionensis,
so named due to its restricted range on Palawan and
adjacent islands (Gaubert and Antunes, 2005; Lagrada
et al., 2014). According to Schoppe and Cruz (2009),
pangolins are unevenly distributed across the Palawan
faunal region, where they are considered more common
in the northern and central parts and rare in the south,
though further research on the status of the species is
needed. It is currently listed as Endangered on the IUCN
Red List of Threatened Species as wild populations are
believed to have declined by more than 50% over a
period of 21 years. However, since 2015, the Palawan
Council for Sustainable Development (PCSD) has listed
M. culionensis as Critically Endangered through the
issuance of PCSD Resolution No. 15-521. Aside from
its restricted range and habitat loss, subsistence hunting
and exploitation for trade (national and international) are
the biggest threats causing population declines (Schoppe
and Cruz, 2009). The full extent of illegal trade in the
Philippine Pangolin is unknown, but reportedly has
increased over the past decade (CITES, 2016). Based on a
An adult male Philippine Pangolin Manis culionensis
that was rescued from a street in Metro Manila, 2018.
EMERSON Y. SY / TRAFFIC
ILLEGAL PANGOLIN TRADE IN THE PHILIPPINES
Lalita Gomez and Emerson Y. Sy
TRAFFIC Bulletin 30(1) 1 May 2018 FINAL.indd 39 5/1/2018 5:04:43 PM
S H O R T R E P O R T
38 TRAFFIC Bulletin Vol. 30 No. 1 (2018)
included in this analysis. Unsubstantiated seizure records
were removed from the dataset. For this study, a “seizure
country” is dened as the country where the seizure took
place, a “source country” is dened as the rst known
point of a trade route, a “transit country” a country which
has functioned as both an importing and a re-exporting
country in the trade route, and a “destination country”
the last known point of a trade route. It should be noted
that the reported seizures likely represent an unknown
fraction of illegal trade, and therefore underrepresent its
true extent. In addition, due to inherent biases in the way
seizure data are reported (given varying levels of law
enforcement, reporting and recording practices, language
biases, NGO eorts and advocacy in dierent countries,
for example), this dataset should be interpreted with
caution and not presumed to be representing absolute
tracking trends or volumes.
Based on seizure data, a minimum number of
pangolins recorded in trade from parts seized was
estimated by either: counting whole or near-whole
specimens observed/seized (e.g. live animals, skins,
carcasses); or tallying quantities of body parts per seizure
(e.g. scales and meat) that form one whole individual.
Where the weight of an animal was given (e.g. meat in
kg), but no count, a minimum and a maximum gure of
whole estimated animals of the Philippine Pangolin was
calculated using 1.3–5.5 kg/animal (juveniles and adults)
(estimates based on data from Schoppe and Cruz, 2009,
and a seizure of three pangolins in which a combined
weight of 16.6 kg was reported). For scales, the authors
used 0.361 kg of scales per animal, following Zhou et
al. (2012) for the Sunda Pangolin as this is assumed to
be the closest value to the Philippine Pangolin, for lack
of any other reference. In all incidents, the minimum
and maximum estimated number of individual animals
was calculated, and a rounded average was used for
subsequent analysis.
Results and Discussion
A total of 39 seizure incidents were found in which the
Philippines was either implicated as a source country or
place of seizure. The total tracked volume was estimated
to be 3,537 pangolins. However, this number was largely
attributed to one incident in which 2,870 pangolins
were seized from a vessel that ran aground in a coral
reef in Tubbataha Reefs Natural Park (PCSD, unpubl.
report). The vessel was manned by Chinese nationals
and according to the arrested crewmen, the pangolins
were from Indonesia en route to China (Gomez et al.,
2017). The animals involved were later conrmed to be
Manis javanica based on molecular analysis (Luczon
et al., 2016) and this particular seizure has therefore
been omitted from further analysis considering that
the Philippines was not a source, transit or destination
country. Tracked volumes of pangolins in the remaining
38 incidents amounted to 667 individuals (Fig. 1).
Based on these data, seizures in the Philippines
appear to have increased slightly after 2010, peaking in
2012 and 2014. Similarly, the volume of pangolins seized
on average increased from 2010 onwards. Commodities
seized were individual specimens (it is uncertain whether
these were of live or dead animals) (n=12 incidents),
dead whole animals (n=12 incidents), meat and scales
(n=9 incidents) and live animals (n=5 incidents) (Fig. 2).
The majority of the seizures occurred within Palawan
province (n=29 incidents), with the remaining incidents
occurring on Luzon (n=5), Mindoro (n=2), Negros (n=1)
and Tablas (n=1). Fig. 3 shows the main trade hotspots
and volumes involved.
In most cases, the Philippines was implicated as a
source country as well as an end-use destination. Based
on the seizure incidents that occurred outside Palawan
province, there appears to be a local demand for pangolin
meat as a luxury food item and scales for traditional
medicine, particularly in Metro Manila. There were
at least ten seizures that implicated Manila as a major
market for pangolins, including a mixture of live and
Fig. 1. Total no. of seizures and total estimated no. of
animals seized involving the Philippines, 2001–2017.
Fig. 2. Pangolin trafcking volumes by commodities
seized, 2001–2017. Note: n = 667 animals seized; whole
animals, comprising live, dead and individuals = 323 animals;
meat and scales involving estimated number of whole
pangolin as described in the methodology = 344 animals.
No of seizures
No of seizures
No of animals
No of animals
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
TRAFFIC Bulletin 30(1) 1 May 2018 FINAL.indd 40 5/1/2018 5:04:44 PM
TRAFFIC Bulletin Vol. 30 No. 1 (2018) 39
S H O R T R E P O R T
frozen animals, presumably for the exotic food industry.
More recently, between January and March 2018, there
have been a further seven incidents of pangolins found
roaming the streets of Metro Manila and an additional
seizure of two live pangolins that were oered for sale,
but no arrests have been made to date in any of these
cases (TRAFFIC, 2018; Sy and Gomez, unpubl. data).
Foreign nationals (for example from mainland China
and Taiwan) residing in the country have also been
implicated in several seizures (Anon., 2012; Arcellaz,
2016; Palatino, 2017; DENR, unpubl. data). Whether this
feeds a local market catering to visitors and/or foreign
nationals residing in the country or an international
market remains uncertain. Live or frozen pangolins and
cooked pangolins, based on recent market observations
sell for PHP12,000 (USD233) and PHP14,000 (USD272),
respectively, in Metro Manila (Sy, unpubl. data).
International trade routes could not be determined
from the seizure data. This is due to the fact that many
of the records are without background information aside
from location of seizure and type and quantity of pangolin
parts seized. Most of the seizures occurred within cities
or municipalities in the Philippines, barring ve incidents
at the Puerto Princesa International Airport in Palawan
and two at the Palawan ports of El Nido Seaport and
Liminangcong Pier, respectively. However, the seizure
data demonstrate that the Philippine Pangolin is actively
being sought for local, national, and likely international
tracking, to meet demand for its meat and scales,
despite being a Critically Endangered endemic species
and one that is protected in the Philippines.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Considering its threatened status, the Philippine
Pangolin may be facing as perilous a fate as its other
Asian counterparts if immediate action is not taken
to clamp down on poaching and tracking of this
species. While there are scant data on wild populations,
available evidence suggests they are increasingly rare
and in decline. This is supported by decreasing catch of
pangolins by poachers in some areas, from an average
of 12 individuals a month in the 1990s to only one
a month, if at all, in 2013 (Challender and Waterman,
2017). Such declines are expected to continue if demand-
driven poaching of the species persists. This is further
exacerbated by their extremely restricted range to only
six islands in the Palawan faunal region and the loss of
suitable habitat occurring here (CITES, 2016). While
the PCSD and the Philippine Operations Group on Ivory
and Illegal Wildlife Trade (POGI) have been enforcing
applicable laws, many regional wildlife oces are
relatively inactive. The authors urge the national and
regional wildlife authorities to enhance enforcement
eorts and to take immediate and appropriate action
against anyone found hunting, selling or in possession
of pangolins and to prosecute them to the full extent
of the law. Greater resources should also be allocated
to investigate and identify primary traders, poachers
and corrupt practices at seaports and airports involved
in pangolin tracking, and appropriate charges led
in court. Conservation organisations should continue
to monitor the trade in pangolins and assess the scale
of the threat, including its impact on local and national
populations, and inform authorities of emerging trends
in order to secure the long-term survival of this species.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Chris R. Shepherd, Kanitha Krishnasamy
and Dan Challender for providing valuable input to improve
a previous draft of this paper, Adelina Benavente-Villena
(PCSD) and Mundita Lim (Biodiversity Management
Bureau-DENR) for providing unpublished apprehension
reports on pangolin seizures in the Philippines, and local
contacts, who shall remain anonymous, for providing
critical information. They also thank Hauser Bears and
an anonymous donor for their support and generous funds
that make their work on pangolins possible.
Fig. 3. Key locations of pangolin seizures in the
Philippines and quantities seized between 2001
and 2017 based on available data.
Note: the locations represent the general region where
the seizures took place.
TRAFFIC Bulletin 30(1) 1 May 2018 FINAL.indd 41 5/1/2018 5:04:44 PM
S H O R T R E P O R T
40 TRAFFIC Bulletin Vol. 30 No. 1 (2018)
Newton, P., Nguyen, V.T., Roberton, S. and Bell, D. (2008).
Pangolins in peril: using local hunters’ knowledge to
conserve elusive species in Vietnam. Endangered Species
Research 6:41–53. DOI: 10.3354/esr00127.
Nijman, V. (2015). Pangolin seizure data reported in the
Indonesian media. TRAFFIC Bulletin 27(2):44–46.
Nijman, V., Zhang, M. and Shepherd, C.R. (2016). Pangolin
trade in the Mong La wildlife market and the role of
Myanmar in the smuggling of pangolins into China. Global
Ecology and Conservation 5:118–126.
Palatino. C. (2017). 2 patay na pangolin, nakumpiska mula
sa Taiwanese (Two dead pangolins, conscated from
a Taiwanese). Online at: http://news.abs-cbn.com/
news/04/19/17/2-patay-na-pangolin-nakumpiska-mu-
la-sa-taiwanese. Viewed on February 2018.
Schoppe, S. and Cruz, R. (2009). The Palawan Pangolin
Manis culionensis, pp. 176–188. In: Pantel, S. and Chin,
S.Y. (Eds). Proceedings of the workshop on trade and
conservation of pangolins native to South and Southeast
Asia: 30 June–2 July 2008, Singapore Zoo. TRAFFIC
Southeast Asia, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
Semiadi, G., Darnaedi, D. and Arief, A.J. (2009). Sunda
Pangolin Manis javanica conservation in Indonesia: status
and problems, pp. 12–17. In: Pantel, S. and Chin, S.Y. (Eds).
Proceedings of the workshop on trade and conservation of
pangolins native to South and Southeast Asia: 30 June–2
July 2008, Singapore Zoo. TRAFFIC Southeast Asia,
Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
Shairp, R., Verissimo, D., Fraser, I., Challender, D. and
MacMillan, D. (2016). Understanding urban demand
for wild meat in Vietnam: implications for conservation
actions. PLoS ONE 11(1):e0134787.
Sopyan, E. (2009). Malayan Pangolin Manis javanica trade in
Sumatra, Indonesia, pp. 134–142. In: Pantel, S. and Chin,
S.Y. (Eds), Proceedings of the workshop on trade and
conservation of pangolins native to South and Southeast
Asia, 30 June–2 July 2008, Singapore Zoo. TRAFFIC
Southeast Asia, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
TRAFFIC (2018). Philippine Pangolins lost in the big city.
http://www.trac.org/home/2018/1/31/philippine-pango-
lins-lost-in-the-big-city.html. Viewed on February 2018.
Tuuga, A. (2009). Pangolin trade in Sabah, Malaysia. Pp.
21–24. In: Pantel, S. and Chin, S.Y. (Eds), Proceedings
of the Workshop on Trade and Conservation of Pangolins
Native to South and Southeast Asia, 30 June–2 July 2008,
Singapore Zoo. TRAFFIC Southeast Asia, Petaling Jaya,
Selangor, Malaysia.
Wu, S.B. and Ma, G.Z. (2007). The status and conservation of
pangolins in China. TRAFFIC East Asia Newsletter 4:1–5.
Wu, S.B., Liu, N.F., Zhang, Y.M. and Ma, G.Z. (2004).
Assessment of threatened status of Chinese Pangolin
(Manis pentadactyla). Chinese Journal of Applied and
Environmental Biology 10:456–461.
Xu, L., Guan, J., Lau, W. and Xiao, Y. (2016). An overview
of pangolin trade in China. TRAFFIC Brieng Paper,
TRAFFIC, Cambridge, UK.
Zhang, L. and Yin, F. (2014). Wildlife consumption and
conservation awareness in China: a long way to go.
Biodiversity Conservation 23:2371–2381.
Zhou, Z.M., Zhao, H., Zhang, Z.X., Wang, Z.H. and Wang, H.
(2012). Allometry of scales in Chinese pangolins (Manis
pentadactyla) and Malayan pangolins (Manis javanica)
and application in judicial expertise. Zoological Research
33(3):271−275.
Lalita Gomez, Programme Ocer, TRAFFIC
E-mail: lalita.gomez@trac.org
Emerson Y. Sy, Consultant, TRAFFIC
E-mail: consultantPHPO1@trac.org
References
Anon. (2012). Pangolin scales seized in Palawan junk shop.
http://news.abs-cbn.com/nation/regions/01/18/12/pangolin-
scales-seized-palawan-junk-shop. Viewed on February 2018.
Arcellaz, P.C. (2016). NBI nabs Chinese mammal smuggler.
http://www.sunstar.com.ph/pampanga/local-news/2016/
04/27/nbi-nabs-chinese-mammal-smuggler-470373.
Viewed on February 2018.
Challender, D. (2011). Asian pangolins: increasing auence
driving hunting pressure. TRAFFIC Bulletin 23(3):92–93.
Challender, D. and Hywood, L. (2012). African pangolins under
increased pressure from poaching and intercontinental
trade. TRAFFIC Bulletin 24(2):53–55.
Challender, D., Baille, J., Waterman, C., Pietersen, D., Nash,
H., Wicker, L., Parker, K., Thomson, P., Nguyen, T.V.,
Hywood, L. and Shepherd, C.R. (2016). On scaling up
pangolin conservation. TRAFFIC Bulletin 28(1):19–21.
Challender, D and Waterman, C. (2017). Implementation of
CITES Decision2 17.239 b) and 17.240 on Pangolins
(Manis spp.). Prepared by IUCN for the CITES Secretariat.
SC69 Doc.57 Annex 1.
CITES (2016). Consideration of Proposals for Amendment of
Appendices I and II: CoP17 Prop. 10, Seventeenth meeting
of the Conference of the Parties Johannesburg (South
Africa), 24 September–5 October 2016.
Cruz, R.M., Beukel, D., Lacerna-Widmann, I., Schoppe, S. and
Widmann, P. (2007). Wildlife trade in Southern Palawan,
Philippines. Banwa 4(1):12–26.
Gaubert and Antunes (2005). Assessing the taxonomic status of
the Palawan Pangolin Manis culionensis (Pholidota) using
discrete morphological characters. Journal of Mammalogy,
86(6):1068–1074, December 2005.
Gomez, L., Leupen, B.T.C. and Tian, K.H. (2016a). The trade
of African pangolins to Asia: a brief case study of pangolin
shipments from Nigeria. TRAFFIC Bulletin 28(1):3–5.
Gomez, L., Leupen, B.T.C., and Heinrich, S. (2016b).
Observation of the illegal pangolin trade in Lao PDR.
TRAFFIC, Southeast Asia Regional Oce, Malaysia.
Gomez, L., Leupen, B.T.C. and Krishnasamy, K. (2017). Scaly
Nexus: Mapping Indonesian pangolin seizures (2010-2015).
TRAFFIC, Southeast Asia Regional Oce, Malaysia.
Heinrich, S., Wittman, T.A., Ross, J.V., Shepherd, C.R.,
Challender, D.W.S., and Cassey, P. (2017). The Global
Tracking of Pangolins: A comprehensive summary of
seizures and tracking routes from 2010–2015. TRAFFIC,
Southeast Asia Regional Oce, Malaysia.
Hung, C.H. and Chung, J. (2018). Thousands of
disembowelled pangolins found. Taipei Times, 3
February 2018. http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/
archives/2018/02/03/2003686943. Viewed on February 2018.
IUCN SSC Pangolin Specialist Group (2016). Status, trends
and conservation of pangolins (Manis spp.): information
document for the 17th meeting of the Conference of Parties
to CITES. 24 September–5 October 2016, Johannesburg
South Africa. IUCN SSC Pangolin Specialist Group,
London, UK.
Lagrada, L., Schoppe, S. and Challender, D. (2014). Manis
culionensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
2014: e.T136497A45223365. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/
IUCN.UK.2014-2.RLTS.T136497A4522 3365.en. Viewed
on February 2018.
Luczon, A.U., Ong, P.S., Quilang, J.P. and Fontanilla, I.K.C.
(2016). Determining species identity from conscated
pangolin remains using DNA barcoding. Mitochondrial
DNA Part B: Resources 1(1):763–766.
Mohapatra, R.K., Panda, S., Acharjyo, L., Nair, M. and
Challender, D.W. (2015). A note on the illegal trade and
use of pangolin body parts in India. TRAFFIC Bulletin
27(1):33–40.
TRAFFIC Bulletin 30(1) 1 May 2018 FINAL.indd 42 5/1/2018 5:04:44 PM
... Existing knowledge of Philippine pangolin trade is limited to analysis of seizure records (Gomez and Sy, 2018;Sy and Sources: GOVPH (1997), Schoppe et al. (2020) and Sy and Krishnasamy (2020). ...
... Records from 2000-2006 show the Philippine pangolin to be the 11th most frequently traded animal in Palawan Province (Cruz et al., 2007). Since then, trade in the species is thought to have grown, with an increase in pangolin seizures in the Philippines post 2010 (Gomez and Sy, 2018), and a nine-fold increase in seizures between 2018 and 2019 compared to the previous two years (Sy and Krishnasamy, 2020). These records could reflect a growth in law enforcement efforts rather than a rise in pangolin trade, as biases that can influence seizure records (e.g., Underwood et al., 2013) were not accounted for. ...
... These records could reflect a growth in law enforcement efforts rather than a rise in pangolin trade, as biases that can influence seizure records (e.g., Underwood et al., 2013) were not accounted for. However, the volume of pangolins seized on average has also increased from 2010 onwards (Gomez and Sy, 2018), suggesting (but not confirming) an actual rather than perceived increase in pangolin trade levels. Within Palawan Province, pangolin seizures have been reported from Puerto Princesa City, Roxas, Taytay, El Nido and Coron municipalities (Gomez and Sy, 2018;Sy and Krishnasamy, 2020) and there is evidence of pangolins being exported internationally to Malaysia from southern Palawan (Schoppe and Cruz, 2008), alongside the domestic trade of pangolins from Palawan to Manila (Sy and Krishnasamy, 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
The illegal wildlife trade represents an urgent conservation challenge, but measuring, understanding, and designing interventions to address it is a complex task. As some of the world's most illegally trafficked wild mammals, pangolins are regularly observed in the illegal wildlife trade, but little is known of the intricacies of the trade at local levels, particularly for lesser-known species such as the Philippine pangolin (Manis culionensis). This research represents the first range-wide study to concurrently document local use and trade of the Philippine pangolin across Palawan Province, Philippines, and provides new information on trade actors, dynamics, and the conditions that help to facilitate this industry. The study was carried out across 18 Palawan municipalities, covering all mainland municipalities, Araceli Island, and the Calamianes Island group. A mixed methods approach was used, combining 1,277 bean count surveys to investigate consumption and hunting levels, alongside 59 in-depth key informant interviews to better understand trade logistics and dynamics. Our results suggest that local use of the species is geographically widespread, but trade hubs were most frequently reported from northern municipalities. Several enabling conditions help facilitate trade across the province, and our data suggest the species may be contributing to the international pangolin trade at levels considerably higher than seizure records indicate.
... A previous study from 2017-2018 indicated that the prices for live or frozen (Fig. 6) and cooked pangolin were PHP10,000 (USD197) and PHP14,000 (USD276) per animal, respectively (Gomez and Sy, 2018). However, a minimum two-fold increase in price has taken place since in Metro Manila, ranging from PHP10,000-20,000 (USD197-394) for live or frozen pangolins and a cooked pangolin dish for PHP30,000-40,000 (USD591-788). ...
... by Trade: The Ongoing Illegal Pangolin Trade in the Philippines Despite national legislations and international trade regulation providing protection to the Philippine Pangolin, poaching and trafficking continue. Seizure data analysis from 2000-2017 documented 38 cases involving an estimated 667(Gomez and Sy, 2018) to 740 (based on estimation method in this study: see methodology section below), with no incidents recorded in 2000. Additionally, over 10 tonnes of frozen Sunda Pangolins involving 2,870 animals were confiscated from a Chinese vessel that crashed into protected coral reefs at the Tubbataha Reefs Natural Park in 2013(Gomez and Sy, 2018). ...
... Seizure data analysis from 2000-2017 documented 38 cases involving an estimated 667(Gomez and Sy, 2018) to 740 (based on estimation method in this study: see methodology section below), with no incidents recorded in 2000. Additionally, over 10 tonnes of frozen Sunda Pangolins involving 2,870 animals were confiscated from a Chinese vessel that crashed into protected coral reefs at the Tubbataha Reefs Natural Park in 2013(Gomez and Sy, 2018). In the last two years, several incidents of individual pangolins found roaming the streets of the National Capital Region (NCR; also known as Metro Manila) and nearby provinces, and arrests of pangolin traffickers have been reported in the news(Anon, 2018;Fabro, 2019;Felipe, 2018;Giron, 2019; TRAFFIC, 2018). ...
Technical Report
Full-text available
Seizure data analysis from 2000–2017 documented 38 cases involving an estimated 667 to 740 Philippine Pangolins. Additionally, 10 tonnes of frozen Sunda Pangolins involving 2,870 animals were confiscated from a vessel in 2013. In the most recent period from 2018–2019, a total of 28 incidents comprising seizures and retrievals involving an estimated 6,894 Philippine Pangolins.The more than nine-fold increase in Philippine Pangolin seizures in the last two years alone is alarming. Recommendations are made, in line with outcomes from the Conservation Planning Workshop for the Philippine Pangolin in 2018, to address the ongoing illegal trade of pangolins in the country.
... No attempt was made to compare the three sources by any measure of effectivity, as their scope, methodology, and level of detail are quite different. Also, while it is recognized that other sources of illegal wildlife capture exist and are of considerable importance, such as TRAFFIC and the various works of Emerson Sy (Sy 2013, Sy 2018, Gomez and Sy 2018, Shepherd and Sy 2018, these were not included since the focus is on official government records. By highlighting the illegal activities (i.e. from confiscations and wild captures) in the CITES records and consolidating these with the local government records, taxa with historically high levels of exploitation through the illegal wildlife trade (IWT) can be identified and appropriate measures can be proposed. ...
Article
Full-text available
The Philippines is a biodiversity hotspot. It is a recognized source, destination, and transit point for the global wildlife trade, which drives biodiversity loss. There is an abundance of data from the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) on the Philippines, but this data has not been assessed for historical trends. Confiscation data reflecting the illegal trade is scarcer, coming from recent (2008 onward) records of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources – Biodiversity Management Bureau (DENR-BMB) and the Palawan Council for Sustainable Development (PCSD). CITES data from 1975 to 2018 include over 16 million units of animals or animal parts from 20,728 trade records. Birds are the most traded taxon at 43.92% of all trade records, and the USA has been the largest importer of wildlife from the Philippines. DENR-BMB and PCSD records show that birds and reptiles each account for 36.46% of confiscated species. Reptiles, particularly sea turtles, are the most frequently traded in the illegal markets. Many species of animals that appear in all three databases are endemic to the Philippines but not afforded enough protection by CITES or national laws and documents such as the Philippine Red List. Temporal trends in both legal and illegal wildlife trade should strongly influence conservation strategies and policies aimed at controlling the trade of wildlife from the Philippines, including reassessment of the conservation status and possible inclusion in CITES Appendices of problematic endemic species.
... In Southeast Asia, illegal and unsustainable trade in wildlife threatens the conservation of numerous species (Duckworth et al., 2012;Nijman et al., 2012;Eaton et al., 2015), and the Philippines is no exception (Cruz et al., 2007;Gonzalez et al., 2018;Gomez and Sy, 2018;Sy, 2018). While there is no scientific study to support claims that Tokay Gecko population in the Philippines is declining, the species is traded in unsustainable and vast numbers from across their range, largely to supply demand in China, or for use in traditional Chinese medicine in other parts of Asian region. ...
Article
Full-text available
The Tokay Gecko Gekko gecko is traded internationally in the millions annually for use in traditional medicines and to a lesser extent, for the pet trade. The vast majority of Tokay Geckos are collected in the wild and apparent captive-bred individuals may be in fact wild-caught as well. A get-rich-quick scheme involving the trade of Tokay Gecko across Southeast Asia began in 2009. Foreign buyers were purportedly willing to pay PHP1,000,000-500,000,000 (USD20,000- 10,000,000) for Tokay Geckos weighing 300-1,000g per individual to cure human immunodeficiency virus (HIV/AIDS), impotence, and cancer. Seizure data between 2010 and 2012 from seven islands in the Philippines documented 24 cases involving 2,092 Tokay Gecko individuals. A proposal to list the Tokay Gecko in the CITES Appendix II was submitted by the Philippines, European Union, India, and the United States to monitor, regulate, and assist in preventing illegal and unsustainable trade and was eventually accepted by the Parties during the 18th meeting of the Conference of Parties (CoP18) in August 2019. We strongly recommend CITES Parties make full and effective use of CITES in preventing over-exploitation of the Tokay Gecko.
... collection of guano). M. culionensis is hunted for local consumption as a luxury food item (Gomez & Sy 2018). Anecdotal evidences also suggest that the species is hunted for the international wildlife trade, specifically for the traditional Chinese medicine market. ...
Article
Full-text available
In 2004, the Philippines' Department of Environment and Natural Resources issued the National List of Threatened Fauna Species. Between 2015 and 2017, this was reviewed by assessing 1994 taxa, including 57 mammals, 683 birds, 355 reptiles, 115 amphibians, and 784 invertebrates, using the threatened categories specified in the 2001 Wildlife Resources Conservation and Protection Act. Another group evaluated the initial assessment if the criteria were properly applied and the taxa were assigned to their appropriate categories. Fifty-five percent or 1105 species were placed under four threatened categories: Critically Endangered (CR) – 60; Endangered (EN) – 61; Vulnerable (VU) – 439; Other Threatened Species (OTS) – 545. For the first time, invertebrates were included in the assessment and accounted for nearly 70% of species listed. Among the vertebrates, an increase in the number of taxa in all categories was notable and most pronounced in birds in all threatened categories. For reptiles, the number doubled but half of these were under OTS. For amphibians, the increase was due to species classified under CR and OTS. For mammals, the number of threatened species also increased except under VU. The number of threatened endemic species increased to 168 species, representing 15% of all threatened taxa.
... Mt. Isarog hairy- (Gomez & Sy 2018). Anecdotal evidences also suggest that the species is hunted for the international wildlife trade, specifically for the traditional Chinese medicine market. ...
Article
Full-text available
In 2004, the Philippines' Department of Environment and Natural Resources issued the National List of Threatened Fauna Species. Between 2015 and 2017, this was reviewed by assessing 1994 taxa, including 57 mammals, 683 birds, 355 reptiles, 115 amphibians, and 784 invertebrates, using the threatened categories specified in the 2001 Wildlife Resources Conservation and Protection Act. Another group evaluated the initial assessment if the criteria were properly applied and the taxa were assigned to their appropriate categories. Fifty-five percent or 1105 species were placed under four threatened categories: Critically Endangered (CR) – 60; Endangered (EN) – 61; Vulnerable (VU) – 439; Other Threatened Species (OTS) – 545. For the first time, invertebrates were included in the assessment and accounted for nearly 70% of species listed. Among the vertebrates, an increase in the number of taxa in all categories was notable and most pronounced in birds in all threatened categories. For reptiles, the number doubled but half of these were under OTS. For amphibians, the increase was due to species classified under CR and OTS. For mammals, the number of threatened species also increased except under VU. The number of threatened endemic species increased to 168 species, representing 15% of all threatened taxa.
Article
Full-text available
Local ecological knowledge (LEK) can provide cost-effective baseline ecological data across large geographical areas, and is increasingly seen as an important source of information for rare and cryptic species. However, to date its use as a practical tool for prioritising conservation action is limited. Pangolins are the world’s most heavily trafficked wild mammals and all species are in decline. The Philippine pangolin (Manis culionensis) is Critically Endangered but conservation efforts are hindered by a lack of knowledge on where populations still exist and where in situ action should be prioritised. We conducted the first range-wide systematic survey for the species using household interviews (n=1,296) to provide new data on pangolin distribution, status and threats, and to assess the use of LEK for highlighting priority areas for conservation. LEK about pangolins was high (87% of respondents recognised pangolins and provided further information), with evidence of pangolin occurrence in 17 of the 18 municipalities surveyed. The majority (70%) of respondents had seen a pangolin, but most (72%) perceived pangolins to be ‘rare’ or ‘very rare’, and local use of pangolins was reported across the species’ range. Spatial differences in sighting frequencies, perceived abundance and reported population trends were observed, providing an important baseline to identify priority sites for targeted research and community-based pangolin conservation.
Technical Report
Full-text available
Pangolins are currently the most heavily trafficked wild mammals in the world. Their meat is considered a delicacy, and has been attributed to have a medicinal/tonic value, their scales are used in traditional medicines, and pangolin skins are processed into leather products. All eight species are listed as threatened on The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species TM. An estimated one million pangolins have been trafficked in the period 2000–2013, however, there is little understanding of the trafficking routes used to transport pangolins globally. In this report, the illegal pangolin trade from 2010–2015 was investigated, focusing on the global trade routes used to traffic pangolins and their derivatives. A total of 1270 seizure incidents were collated, which included at least 20 749 kg and an additional 7154 individual pangolin body parts, 55 251 kg and an additional 5613 individual pangolin scales, and 44 475 kg and an additional 46 760 individual whole pangolins. This excluded a total of 7.6% of all incidents where no quantitative information was available. A subset of these data (excluding domestic trade) was used to study international trafficking routes. An average of 33 countries and territories were involved in international pangolin trafficking per year. Notably, an average of 27 new trade routes were identified each year, highlighting that wildlife trafficking occurs through a highly mobile trade network with constantly shifting trade routes. The seizure incidents involved 67 countries and territories across six continents; demonstrating the global nature of pangolin trafficking, which is not limited to Asian and African range countries. China and the United States of America (US) were identified as the most common destinations for international pangolin trafficking during the six-year period. China was the main destination for large-quantity shipments of scales (here defined as shipments involving ≥1000 kg of scales) and whole animals (here defined as shipments involving ≥500 pangolins), while the US was the main destination for large-quantity shipments of body parts (here defined as shipments involving ≥100 body parts). Europe was identified as an important transit hub, mostly for African pangolins (and their parts and derivatives) being transported to Asia. Germany, France and Belgium were particularly prominent. An exception was the Netherlands, which was reported as a destination for large-quantity shipments of body parts and scales from China and Uganda respectively, as well as a common destination for shipments from China. However, most international trafficking of pangolins (and their parts and derivatives) occurred within Asia, both in terms of number of incidents and quantity. Of the top ten countries and territories involved in the most trafficking incidents, seven were in Asia, namely China, Viet Nam, Malaysia, Hong Kong SAR, Thailand, Lao PDR, and Indonesia. The remaining three were the US, Nigeria, and Germany. Body parts (including a variety of raw derivatives or processed commodities, such as skins, trophies, leather products, and medicinals) were significantly more likely to be from an Asian pangolin species relative to other commodities in trade and species origins, but the transport mode for body part shipments was largely unreported. The analysis of large-quantity shipments indicated that 80% of the trade in body parts was from China and Viet Nam and destined almost exclusively for the US, with the exception of one case, where the Netherlands was the reported destination. Trafficking of scales was significantly more likely to be of African origin and to be transported by air, relative to other transport modes and origins. Analysis of large-quantity shipments involving scales indicated that 55% of these shipments were of African origin, namely from Cameroon, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, and Uganda. The number of large-quantity shipments of scales, as well as the weight of such shipments, increased significantly through time, as did the number of incidents involving African pangolin species. China was the main destination for the large-quantity shipments of scales, but other destinations for these shipments were Hong Kong SAR, the Netherlands, and Viet Nam. Whole animals were significantly more likely to be transported by land, relative to the other transport modes and commodities, and large-quantity shipments involving whole animals were exclusively traded within Asia. Of these large-quantity shipments, Indonesia and Malaysia were the most common origin countries, although Malaysia was also identified as an important destination and transit country. Other destinations for large-quantity shipments of whole pangolins included China, Singapore, Thailand, and Viet Nam.
Article
Full-text available
Illegal wildlife trade is one of the key threats to biodiversity. A requisite in combating illegal wildlife trade is through effective and efficient identification of confiscated wildlife or wildlife remains. This can be done through DNA barcoding. In this study, DNA barcoding was employed on several cases of poaching in the Philippines involving 85 unidentified pangolin remains. Of these, 73 specimens confiscated from Palawan were identified as the Palawan endemic Manis culionensis, but no deep divergences were observed, suggesting that the samples originated from a single locality. The other 12 individuals, which were part of a large haul of pangolin carcasses recovered from a foreign fishing vessel that ran aground in Tubattaha Reefs, Philippines, were identified as the Malayan Pangolin, M. javanica. They split into two groups with 3.3% mean genetic distance, suggesting at least two geographic origins.
Article
Full-text available
Vietnam is a significant consumer of wildlife, particularly wild meat, in urban restaurant settings. To meet this demand, poaching of wildlife is widespread, threatening regional and international biodiversity. Previous interventions to tackle illegal and potentially unsustainable consumption of wild meat in Vietnam have generally focused on limiting supply. While critical, they have been impeded by a lack of resources, the presence of increasingly organised criminal networks and corruption. Attention is, therefore, turning to the consumer, but a paucity of research investigating consumer demand for wild meat will impede the creation of effective consumer-centred interventions. Here we used a mixed-methods research approach comprising a hypothetical choice modelling survey and qualitative interviews to explore the drivers of wild meat consumption and consumer preferences among residents of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Our findings indicate that demand for wild meat is heterogeneous and highly context specific. Wild-sourced, rare, and expensive wild meat-types are eaten by those situated towards the top of the societal hierarchy to convey wealth and status and are commonly consumed in lucrative business contexts. Cheaper, legal and farmed substitutes for wild-sourced meats are also consumed, but typically in more casual consumption or social drinking settings. We explore the implications of our results for current conservation interventions in Vietnam that attempt to tackle illegal and potentially unsustainable trade in and consumption of wild meat and detail how our research informs future consumer-centric conservation actions.
Article
Full-text available
We report on the illegal trade in live pangolins, their meat, and their scales in the Special Development Zone of Mong La, Shan State, Myanmar, on the border with China, and present an analysis of the role of Myanmar in the trade of pangolins into China. Mong La caters exclusively for the Chinese market and is best described as a Chinese enclave in Myanmar. We surveyed the morning market, wildlife trophy shops and wild meat restaurants during four visits in 2006, 2009, 2013–2014, and 2015. We observed 42 bags of scales, 32 whole skins, 16 foetuses or pangolin parts in wine, and 27 whole pangolins for sale. Our observations suggest Mong La has emerged as a significant hub of the pangolin trade. The origin of the pangolins is unclear but it seems to comprise a mixture of pangolins from Myanmar and neighbouring countries, and potentially African countries. Myanmar, on the basis of its geographic position, size and weak government, has emerged as an important transit country for the smuggling of pangolins to China. Data from 29 seizures from Myanmar and 23 from neighbouring countries (Thailand, India, China) implicating Myanmar as a source of pangolins or as a transit point for pangolins sourced in other countries, in the period 2010–2014, illustrate the magnitude of this trade. Combined these seizures amount to 4339 kg of scales and 518 whole pangolins, with a retail value in Myanmar of US$3.09 million. Trade in pangolins, their parts of their derivatives is illegal in Myanmar and CITES II listing with a zero-quota preclude international trade in them. We urge the Myanmar government to liaise with regional authorities to curb the trade in pangolins and recommend that the Myanmar and Chinese CITES authorities in particular come together urgently as to resolve the illicit trade of pangolins and their parts across their borders.
Article
Full-text available
An attitudinal survey on wildlife consumption and conservation awareness was conducted in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Kunming and Nanning of China recently. Comparison with the results from a similar survey we did in 2004, after 8 years, the proportion of respondents who had consumed wildlife was dropped slightly from 31.3 % down to 29.6 %. It showed that the rates of wildlife consumed as food and as ingredients for traditional medicines in Guangzhou and Nanning ranked in the top. The consumptions in these two cities were mostly driven by utilitarian motivation, and mainly for food. Meanwhile, the rate of consumers taking wildlife as food was declining significantly in Beijing after 8 years. The results also showed that 52.7 % agreed that wildlife should not be consumed, which was significantly increased comparison with the survey result of 42.7 % in 2004. In addition, respondents agreed that wildlife could be used significantly decline from 42.8 to 34.8 %. It’s indicated that wildlife conservation awareness was raised in China in the past years. We also founded that consumers with higher income and higher educational background were having higher wildlife consumption rate. It suggested that to strengthen the law enforcement and to promote the public awareness were keys to reduce wildlife consumption in China.