Content uploaded by Emerson Y. Sy
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Emerson Y. Sy on May 03, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
TRAFFIC Bulletin Vol. 30 No. 1 (2018) 37
S H O R T R E P O R T
preliminary study of the pangolin trade in the Philippines
by Schoppe and Cruz (2009), much of the trade in the
Philippine Pangolin is localised to meet demand for food
and for use in traditional medicine. They also revealed,
to a lesser extent, some international trade which is
suspected to be destined for Malaysia, from where it
then enters tracking chains to East Asia. However,
in general, there is very little documented data on the
exploitation of animals in Palawan, or to what extent
trade feeds a domestic or international market, let alone
the impact trade is having on the species’s population
(Cruz et al., 2007). The Philippine Pangolin is protected
in the Philippines which means no trade or hunting of
the species is allowed, not even by indigenous groups
for food or traditional medicine (Schoppe and Cruz,
2009). Similarly, as an Appendix I-listed species under
the Convention on International Trade in Endangered
Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) all international
commercial trade in wild-caught specimens is prohibited.
This study documents all known illegal trade of the
Philippine Pangolin through an analysis of seizures that
have occurred between 2001 and 2017 as well as through
anecdotal observations of trade in the country.
Methods
Seizure data for the period 2001–2017 were extracted
from a variety of sources, including unpublished PCSD
apprehension reports, Department of Environment and
Natural Resources (DENR), TRAFFIC publications, open
source media, the CITES Trade Database, grey literature
and from several non-governmental organisations in
the Philippines. All records involving the Philippines
as a known origin, transit point or end destination were
Introduction
Pangolins are currently among the most heavily-
tracked mammals in the world (Newton et
al., 2008; Challender and Waterman, 2017).
Persistent demand continues to put pressure on
all eight extant pangolin species (Challender,
2011; Challender and Hywood, 2012; Gomez et al.,
2016a; Nijman et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2016). At least
67 countries and territories across six continents were
implicated in the tracking of pangolins between 2010
and 2015 indicating the global scale of illegal trade
and the associated threat to pangolins (Heinrich et al.,
2017). Pangolins are especially sought after in Africa and
Asia for their meat and scales, with the latter used for
traditional medicinal purposes (Wu et al., 2004; Wu and
Ma, 2007; Zhang and Yin, 2014; Nijman, 2015; Gomez
et al., 2016a, 2016b), while their meat is consumed as
a luxury dish or local source of protein (Mohapatra et
al., 2015; Shairp et al., 2016). As pangolin populations
in China and in neighbouring countries in South-east
Asia have dwindled over recent decades, harvesting
for the trade has moved southwards across the Asian
continent, with Malaysia and Indonesia currently among
the most important regional suppliers in international
tracking (Semiadi et al., 2009; Sopyan, 2009; Tuuga,
2009; Challender, 2011, IUCN SSC Pangolin Specialist
Group, 2016; Gomez et al., 2017). Increasingly there has
also been some shift in trade from Asian species (likely
due to dwindling populations) to African species, with
intercontinental trade records involving large quantities
of pangolin scales (i.e. several tonnes) (Challender and
Hywood, 2012; Challender et al., 2016; Gomez et al.,
2016a; Heinrich et al., 2017; Hung and Chung, 2018).
The Philippines is home to one species of pangolin,
the Philippine or Palawan Pangolin Manis culionensis,
so named due to its restricted range on Palawan and
adjacent islands (Gaubert and Antunes, 2005; Lagrada
et al., 2014). According to Schoppe and Cruz (2009),
pangolins are unevenly distributed across the Palawan
faunal region, where they are considered more common
in the northern and central parts and rare in the south,
though further research on the status of the species is
needed. It is currently listed as Endangered on the IUCN
Red List of Threatened Species as wild populations are
believed to have declined by more than 50% over a
period of 21 years. However, since 2015, the Palawan
Council for Sustainable Development (PCSD) has listed
M. culionensis as Critically Endangered through the
issuance of PCSD Resolution No. 15-521. Aside from
its restricted range and habitat loss, subsistence hunting
and exploitation for trade (national and international) are
the biggest threats causing population declines (Schoppe
and Cruz, 2009). The full extent of illegal trade in the
Philippine Pangolin is unknown, but reportedly has
increased over the past decade (CITES, 2016). Based on a
An adult male Philippine Pangolin Manis culionensis
that was rescued from a street in Metro Manila, 2018.
EMERSON Y. SY / TRAFFIC
ILLEGAL PANGOLIN TRADE IN THE PHILIPPINES
Lalita Gomez and Emerson Y. Sy
TRAFFIC Bulletin 30(1) 1 May 2018 FINAL.indd 39 5/1/2018 5:04:43 PM
S H O R T R E P O R T
38 TRAFFIC Bulletin Vol. 30 No. 1 (2018)
included in this analysis. Unsubstantiated seizure records
were removed from the dataset. For this study, a “seizure
country” is dened as the country where the seizure took
place, a “source country” is dened as the rst known
point of a trade route, a “transit country” a country which
has functioned as both an importing and a re-exporting
country in the trade route, and a “destination country”
the last known point of a trade route. It should be noted
that the reported seizures likely represent an unknown
fraction of illegal trade, and therefore underrepresent its
true extent. In addition, due to inherent biases in the way
seizure data are reported (given varying levels of law
enforcement, reporting and recording practices, language
biases, NGO eorts and advocacy in dierent countries,
for example), this dataset should be interpreted with
caution and not presumed to be representing absolute
tracking trends or volumes.
Based on seizure data, a minimum number of
pangolins recorded in trade from parts seized was
estimated by either: counting whole or near-whole
specimens observed/seized (e.g. live animals, skins,
carcasses); or tallying quantities of body parts per seizure
(e.g. scales and meat) that form one whole individual.
Where the weight of an animal was given (e.g. meat in
kg), but no count, a minimum and a maximum gure of
whole estimated animals of the Philippine Pangolin was
calculated using 1.3–5.5 kg/animal (juveniles and adults)
(estimates based on data from Schoppe and Cruz, 2009,
and a seizure of three pangolins in which a combined
weight of 16.6 kg was reported). For scales, the authors
used 0.361 kg of scales per animal, following Zhou et
al. (2012) for the Sunda Pangolin as this is assumed to
be the closest value to the Philippine Pangolin, for lack
of any other reference. In all incidents, the minimum
and maximum estimated number of individual animals
was calculated, and a rounded average was used for
subsequent analysis.
Results and Discussion
A total of 39 seizure incidents were found in which the
Philippines was either implicated as a source country or
place of seizure. The total tracked volume was estimated
to be 3,537 pangolins. However, this number was largely
attributed to one incident in which 2,870 pangolins
were seized from a vessel that ran aground in a coral
reef in Tubbataha Reefs Natural Park (PCSD, unpubl.
report). The vessel was manned by Chinese nationals
and according to the arrested crewmen, the pangolins
were from Indonesia en route to China (Gomez et al.,
2017). The animals involved were later conrmed to be
Manis javanica based on molecular analysis (Luczon
et al., 2016) and this particular seizure has therefore
been omitted from further analysis considering that
the Philippines was not a source, transit or destination
country. Tracked volumes of pangolins in the remaining
38 incidents amounted to 667 individuals (Fig. 1).
Based on these data, seizures in the Philippines
appear to have increased slightly after 2010, peaking in
2012 and 2014. Similarly, the volume of pangolins seized
on average increased from 2010 onwards. Commodities
seized were individual specimens (it is uncertain whether
these were of live or dead animals) (n=12 incidents),
dead whole animals (n=12 incidents), meat and scales
(n=9 incidents) and live animals (n=5 incidents) (Fig. 2).
The majority of the seizures occurred within Palawan
province (n=29 incidents), with the remaining incidents
occurring on Luzon (n=5), Mindoro (n=2), Negros (n=1)
and Tablas (n=1). Fig. 3 shows the main trade hotspots
and volumes involved.
In most cases, the Philippines was implicated as a
source country as well as an end-use destination. Based
on the seizure incidents that occurred outside Palawan
province, there appears to be a local demand for pangolin
meat as a luxury food item and scales for traditional
medicine, particularly in Metro Manila. There were
at least ten seizures that implicated Manila as a major
market for pangolins, including a mixture of live and
Fig. 1. Total no. of seizures and total estimated no. of
animals seized involving the Philippines, 2001–2017.
Fig. 2. Pangolin trafcking volumes by commodities
seized, 2001–2017. Note: n = 667 animals seized; whole
animals, comprising live, dead and individuals = 323 animals;
meat and scales involving estimated number of whole
pangolin as described in the methodology = 344 animals.
No of seizures
No of seizures
No of animals
No of animals
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
TRAFFIC Bulletin 30(1) 1 May 2018 FINAL.indd 40 5/1/2018 5:04:44 PM
TRAFFIC Bulletin Vol. 30 No. 1 (2018) 39
S H O R T R E P O R T
frozen animals, presumably for the exotic food industry.
More recently, between January and March 2018, there
have been a further seven incidents of pangolins found
roaming the streets of Metro Manila and an additional
seizure of two live pangolins that were oered for sale,
but no arrests have been made to date in any of these
cases (TRAFFIC, 2018; Sy and Gomez, unpubl. data).
Foreign nationals (for example from mainland China
and Taiwan) residing in the country have also been
implicated in several seizures (Anon., 2012; Arcellaz,
2016; Palatino, 2017; DENR, unpubl. data). Whether this
feeds a local market catering to visitors and/or foreign
nationals residing in the country or an international
market remains uncertain. Live or frozen pangolins and
cooked pangolins, based on recent market observations
sell for PHP12,000 (USD233) and PHP14,000 (USD272),
respectively, in Metro Manila (Sy, unpubl. data).
International trade routes could not be determined
from the seizure data. This is due to the fact that many
of the records are without background information aside
from location of seizure and type and quantity of pangolin
parts seized. Most of the seizures occurred within cities
or municipalities in the Philippines, barring ve incidents
at the Puerto Princesa International Airport in Palawan
and two at the Palawan ports of El Nido Seaport and
Liminangcong Pier, respectively. However, the seizure
data demonstrate that the Philippine Pangolin is actively
being sought for local, national, and likely international
tracking, to meet demand for its meat and scales,
despite being a Critically Endangered endemic species
and one that is protected in the Philippines.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Considering its threatened status, the Philippine
Pangolin may be facing as perilous a fate as its other
Asian counterparts if immediate action is not taken
to clamp down on poaching and tracking of this
species. While there are scant data on wild populations,
available evidence suggests they are increasingly rare
and in decline. This is supported by decreasing catch of
pangolins by poachers in some areas, from an average
of 12 individuals a month in the 1990s to only one
a month, if at all, in 2013 (Challender and Waterman,
2017). Such declines are expected to continue if demand-
driven poaching of the species persists. This is further
exacerbated by their extremely restricted range to only
six islands in the Palawan faunal region and the loss of
suitable habitat occurring here (CITES, 2016). While
the PCSD and the Philippine Operations Group on Ivory
and Illegal Wildlife Trade (POGI) have been enforcing
applicable laws, many regional wildlife oces are
relatively inactive. The authors urge the national and
regional wildlife authorities to enhance enforcement
eorts and to take immediate and appropriate action
against anyone found hunting, selling or in possession
of pangolins and to prosecute them to the full extent
of the law. Greater resources should also be allocated
to investigate and identify primary traders, poachers
and corrupt practices at seaports and airports involved
in pangolin tracking, and appropriate charges led
in court. Conservation organisations should continue
to monitor the trade in pangolins and assess the scale
of the threat, including its impact on local and national
populations, and inform authorities of emerging trends
in order to secure the long-term survival of this species.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Chris R. Shepherd, Kanitha Krishnasamy
and Dan Challender for providing valuable input to improve
a previous draft of this paper, Adelina Benavente-Villena
(PCSD) and Mundita Lim (Biodiversity Management
Bureau-DENR) for providing unpublished apprehension
reports on pangolin seizures in the Philippines, and local
contacts, who shall remain anonymous, for providing
critical information. They also thank Hauser Bears and
an anonymous donor for their support and generous funds
that make their work on pangolins possible.
Fig. 3. Key locations of pangolin seizures in the
Philippines and quantities seized between 2001
and 2017 based on available data.
Note: the locations represent the general region where
the seizures took place.
◄
TRAFFIC Bulletin 30(1) 1 May 2018 FINAL.indd 41 5/1/2018 5:04:44 PM
S H O R T R E P O R T
40 TRAFFIC Bulletin Vol. 30 No. 1 (2018)
Newton, P., Nguyen, V.T., Roberton, S. and Bell, D. (2008).
Pangolins in peril: using local hunters’ knowledge to
conserve elusive species in Vietnam. Endangered Species
Research 6:41–53. DOI: 10.3354/esr00127.
Nijman, V. (2015). Pangolin seizure data reported in the
Indonesian media. TRAFFIC Bulletin 27(2):44–46.
Nijman, V., Zhang, M. and Shepherd, C.R. (2016). Pangolin
trade in the Mong La wildlife market and the role of
Myanmar in the smuggling of pangolins into China. Global
Ecology and Conservation 5:118–126.
Palatino. C. (2017). 2 patay na pangolin, nakumpiska mula
sa Taiwanese (Two dead pangolins, conscated from
a Taiwanese). Online at: http://news.abs-cbn.com/
news/04/19/17/2-patay-na-pangolin-nakumpiska-mu-
la-sa-taiwanese. Viewed on February 2018.
Schoppe, S. and Cruz, R. (2009). The Palawan Pangolin
Manis culionensis, pp. 176–188. In: Pantel, S. and Chin,
S.Y. (Eds). Proceedings of the workshop on trade and
conservation of pangolins native to South and Southeast
Asia: 30 June–2 July 2008, Singapore Zoo. TRAFFIC
Southeast Asia, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
Semiadi, G., Darnaedi, D. and Arief, A.J. (2009). Sunda
Pangolin Manis javanica conservation in Indonesia: status
and problems, pp. 12–17. In: Pantel, S. and Chin, S.Y. (Eds).
Proceedings of the workshop on trade and conservation of
pangolins native to South and Southeast Asia: 30 June–2
July 2008, Singapore Zoo. TRAFFIC Southeast Asia,
Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
Shairp, R., Verissimo, D., Fraser, I., Challender, D. and
MacMillan, D. (2016). Understanding urban demand
for wild meat in Vietnam: implications for conservation
actions. PLoS ONE 11(1):e0134787.
Sopyan, E. (2009). Malayan Pangolin Manis javanica trade in
Sumatra, Indonesia, pp. 134–142. In: Pantel, S. and Chin,
S.Y. (Eds), Proceedings of the workshop on trade and
conservation of pangolins native to South and Southeast
Asia, 30 June–2 July 2008, Singapore Zoo. TRAFFIC
Southeast Asia, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
TRAFFIC (2018). Philippine Pangolins lost in the big city.
http://www.trac.org/home/2018/1/31/philippine-pango-
lins-lost-in-the-big-city.html. Viewed on February 2018.
Tuuga, A. (2009). Pangolin trade in Sabah, Malaysia. Pp.
21–24. In: Pantel, S. and Chin, S.Y. (Eds), Proceedings
of the Workshop on Trade and Conservation of Pangolins
Native to South and Southeast Asia, 30 June–2 July 2008,
Singapore Zoo. TRAFFIC Southeast Asia, Petaling Jaya,
Selangor, Malaysia.
Wu, S.B. and Ma, G.Z. (2007). The status and conservation of
pangolins in China. TRAFFIC East Asia Newsletter 4:1–5.
Wu, S.B., Liu, N.F., Zhang, Y.M. and Ma, G.Z. (2004).
Assessment of threatened status of Chinese Pangolin
(Manis pentadactyla). Chinese Journal of Applied and
Environmental Biology 10:456–461.
Xu, L., Guan, J., Lau, W. and Xiao, Y. (2016). An overview
of pangolin trade in China. TRAFFIC Brieng Paper,
TRAFFIC, Cambridge, UK.
Zhang, L. and Yin, F. (2014). Wildlife consumption and
conservation awareness in China: a long way to go.
Biodiversity Conservation 23:2371–2381.
Zhou, Z.M., Zhao, H., Zhang, Z.X., Wang, Z.H. and Wang, H.
(2012). Allometry of scales in Chinese pangolins (Manis
pentadactyla) and Malayan pangolins (Manis javanica)
and application in judicial expertise. Zoological Research
33(3):271−275.
Lalita Gomez, Programme Ocer, TRAFFIC
E-mail: lalita.gomez@trac.org
Emerson Y. Sy, Consultant, TRAFFIC
E-mail: consultantPHPO1@trac.org
References
Anon. (2012). Pangolin scales seized in Palawan junk shop.
http://news.abs-cbn.com/nation/regions/01/18/12/pangolin-
scales-seized-palawan-junk-shop. Viewed on February 2018.
Arcellaz, P.C. (2016). NBI nabs Chinese mammal smuggler.
http://www.sunstar.com.ph/pampanga/local-news/2016/
04/27/nbi-nabs-chinese-mammal-smuggler-470373.
Viewed on February 2018.
Challender, D. (2011). Asian pangolins: increasing auence
driving hunting pressure. TRAFFIC Bulletin 23(3):92–93.
Challender, D. and Hywood, L. (2012). African pangolins under
increased pressure from poaching and intercontinental
trade. TRAFFIC Bulletin 24(2):53–55.
Challender, D., Baille, J., Waterman, C., Pietersen, D., Nash,
H., Wicker, L., Parker, K., Thomson, P., Nguyen, T.V.,
Hywood, L. and Shepherd, C.R. (2016). On scaling up
pangolin conservation. TRAFFIC Bulletin 28(1):19–21.
Challender, D and Waterman, C. (2017). Implementation of
CITES Decision2 17.239 b) and 17.240 on Pangolins
(Manis spp.). Prepared by IUCN for the CITES Secretariat.
SC69 Doc.57 Annex 1.
CITES (2016). Consideration of Proposals for Amendment of
Appendices I and II: CoP17 Prop. 10, Seventeenth meeting
of the Conference of the Parties Johannesburg (South
Africa), 24 September–5 October 2016.
Cruz, R.M., Beukel, D., Lacerna-Widmann, I., Schoppe, S. and
Widmann, P. (2007). Wildlife trade in Southern Palawan,
Philippines. Banwa 4(1):12–26.
Gaubert and Antunes (2005). Assessing the taxonomic status of
the Palawan Pangolin Manis culionensis (Pholidota) using
discrete morphological characters. Journal of Mammalogy,
86(6):1068–1074, December 2005.
Gomez, L., Leupen, B.T.C. and Tian, K.H. (2016a). The trade
of African pangolins to Asia: a brief case study of pangolin
shipments from Nigeria. TRAFFIC Bulletin 28(1):3–5.
Gomez, L., Leupen, B.T.C., and Heinrich, S. (2016b).
Observation of the illegal pangolin trade in Lao PDR.
TRAFFIC, Southeast Asia Regional Oce, Malaysia.
Gomez, L., Leupen, B.T.C. and Krishnasamy, K. (2017). Scaly
Nexus: Mapping Indonesian pangolin seizures (2010-2015).
TRAFFIC, Southeast Asia Regional Oce, Malaysia.
Heinrich, S., Wittman, T.A., Ross, J.V., Shepherd, C.R.,
Challender, D.W.S., and Cassey, P. (2017). The Global
Tracking of Pangolins: A comprehensive summary of
seizures and tracking routes from 2010–2015. TRAFFIC,
Southeast Asia Regional Oce, Malaysia.
Hung, C.H. and Chung, J. (2018). Thousands of
disembowelled pangolins found. Taipei Times, 3
February 2018. http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/
archives/2018/02/03/2003686943. Viewed on February 2018.
IUCN SSC Pangolin Specialist Group (2016). Status, trends
and conservation of pangolins (Manis spp.): information
document for the 17th meeting of the Conference of Parties
to CITES. 24 September–5 October 2016, Johannesburg
South Africa. IUCN SSC Pangolin Specialist Group,
London, UK.
Lagrada, L., Schoppe, S. and Challender, D. (2014). Manis
culionensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
2014: e.T136497A45223365. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/
IUCN.UK.2014-2.RLTS.T136497A4522 3365.en. Viewed
on February 2018.
Luczon, A.U., Ong, P.S., Quilang, J.P. and Fontanilla, I.K.C.
(2016). Determining species identity from conscated
pangolin remains using DNA barcoding. Mitochondrial
DNA Part B: Resources 1(1):763–766.
Mohapatra, R.K., Panda, S., Acharjyo, L., Nair, M. and
Challender, D.W. (2015). A note on the illegal trade and
use of pangolin body parts in India. TRAFFIC Bulletin
27(1):33–40.
TRAFFIC Bulletin 30(1) 1 May 2018 FINAL.indd 42 5/1/2018 5:04:44 PM