Content uploaded by David Brown
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by David Brown on May 01, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
Adebiyi et al.: Effects of feeding hydroponics maize fodder on performance and nutrient digestibility of weaned pigs
- 2415 -
APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 16(3):2415-2422.
http://www.aloki.hu ● ISSN 1589 1623 (Print) ● ISSN 1785 0037 (Online)
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1603_24152422
2018, ALÖKI Kft., Budapest, Hungary
EFFECTS OF FEEDING HYDROPONICS MAIZE FODDER ON
PERFORMANCE AND NUTRIENT DIGESTIBILITY OF
WEANED PIGS
ADEBIYI, O. A.1 – ADEOLA, A. T.1 – OSINOWO, O. A.2 – BROWN, D.3* – NG’AMBI, J. W.3
1Department of Animal Science, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
2Department of Agricultural Education, Federal College of Education
Osiele, Abeokuta, Nigeria
3Department of Animal Production, School of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences,
University of Limpopo, Private Bag X1106, Sovenga, Polokwane, South Africa
*Corresponding author
e-mail: db4010396@gmail.com
(Received 9th Jan 2018; accepted 3rd Apr 2018)
Abstract. A study was conducted to investigate the effects of feeding hydroponics maize fodder on
performance and nutrient digestibility of weaned pigs. A total of 36 pigs were allocated in a completely
randomized design to 3 treatments. Treatment 1 contained 100% concentrate (Con100); Treatment 2
contained 50% concentrate and 50% hydroponics maize fodder (Con50HM50) while Treatment 3 had 100%
hydroponics maize fodder diet (HM100). Each treatment had 12 weaned pigs with three replicates of four
pigs per replicate. The experiment lasted for six weeks. Dietary treatments had significant effects (P < 0.05)
on final weight, weight gain and feed conversion ratio of the pigs. Pigs fed Con100 had the highest (P < 0.05)
final weight while the lowest weight was recorded in pigs on diet HM100. Feed intake and weight gain were
highest (P < 0.05) in pigs fed concentrate diet (Con100) while the lowest intake was in animals fed HM100.
Feed conversion ratio (FCR) was improved (P < 0.05) in pigs fed Con100 and Con50HM50 respectively. Crude
protein, crude fibre and ether extract digestibilities were improved (P < 0.05) in animals fed Con100. Pigs fed
dietary mixtures of concentrate and hydroponics maize fodder (Con50HM50) had better (P < 0.05) CP and CF
digestibility as compared to those on HM100. Inclusion of hydroponics maize fodder in pig nutrition
improved performance and nutrient digestibility of weaned pigs.
Keywords: sprouted, monogastric, technology, diet, concentrate
Introduction
Pig production is one of the fastest growing livestock sector in developing countries
like Nigeria (Imonikebe and Kperegbeyi, 2014). Compared to ruminants, pigs are prolific,
have high feed conversion efficiency, early maturing, require small space and easy to
manage (Ouma et al., 2014). According to Tewe and Egbunike (1998), pig production
represents the cheapest means of correcting animal protein shortage among the
impoverished people in Nigeria. However, their production is facing tremendous set back
and on the verge of collapse due to unavailability of feed, which accounts for 70-80% of
the total cost of production (Olomu and Oboh, 1995). The major factors responsible for
the shortage of green fodder are scarcity of land due to small land holding size, water
shortage and labour (Naik et al., 2015).
A possible way of solving this problem of feed scarcity in pig industry is through the
use of hydroponic farming systems. Fodder produced by growing plants in water or
nutrient rich solution but without using any soil is known as hydroponics fodder, sprouted
grains or sprouted fodder (Dung et al., 2010a). Production of hydroponics fodder involves
Adebiyi et al.: Effects of feeding hydroponics maize fodder on performance and nutrient digestibility of weaned pigs
- 2416 -
APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 16(3):2415-2422.
http://www.aloki.hu ● ISSN 1589 1623 (Print) ● ISSN 1785 0037 (Online)
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1603_24152422
2018, ALÖKI Kft., Budapest, Hungary
growing of plants without soil but in water or nutrient rich solution in a greenhouse (hi-
tech or low cost devices) for a short duration - approx. 7 days - (Naik et al., 2015).
Hydroponics technology has been recognized as a viable method of producing
vegetables (tomatoes, lettuce, cucumbers and peppers) as well as ornamental crops such
as herbs, roses, freesia and foliage plants. Different types of fodder crops such as barley
(Reddy et al., 1988), oats, wheat (Snow et al., 2008); sorghum, alfalfa, cowpea (AI-
Karaki and AI-Hashimi, 2012) and maize (Naik et al., 2012) can be produced by
hydroponics technology. Hydroponics fodder is more palatable, digestible and nutritious
while imparting other health benefits to the animals (Suraj et al., 2016). Naik et al. (2015)
reported yields of 5-6 folds of fresh hydroponics maize fodder in 7 days. Supplementation
of sprouted fodder in the ration of pigs is a viable possible alternative technology to
conventional green fodder (Naik et al., 2015). However, there is paucity of information on
the use of hydroponically sprouted maize fodder in weaned pigs. Therefore, the objective
of this study was to determine the effect of feeding hydroponics maize fodder on the
growth performance and nutrient digestibility of weaned pigs.
Materials and methods
Study site and experimental design
This study was carried out at the Piggery Unit, Teaching and Research Farm,
University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. The farm is situated in Southern Nigeria at 70201N,
30501E at an altitude of 200-300 m above sea level. A total of 36 weaned pigs were
purchased from a reputable farm in Ibadan, Oyo state, Nigeria. The pigs were fed ad
libitum and cool clean water was provided. The pigs were allotted into three groups
consisting of 12 animals per group, replicated three times with four pigs per replicate in a
completely randomized design. The groups were allocated into 3 treatments as follows-
Pigs fed 100% concentrate diet (Con100), pigs fed 50% concentrate diet and 50%
hydroponics maize fodder (Con50HM50) and pigs fed 100% hydroponics maize fodder
(HM100). The concentrate composition is presented in Table 1. The experiment lasted for
six weeks. Pigs were housed in properly disinfected pens and all routine management
practices were strictly observed.
Table 1. Gross composition of concentrate fed to weaned pigs
Ingredient
Percentage (%)
Maize
43.00
Soyabean meal
15.00
Wheat offal
15.00
Groundnut cake
7.00
Palm kernel cake
15.00
Palm oil
3.00
Limestone
1.25
Salt
0.50
Premix
0.25
Total
100.00
Calculated nutrient
Crude protein (%)
19.03
Metabolizable energy (kcal/kg)
2905.20
Adebiyi et al.: Effects of feeding hydroponics maize fodder on performance and nutrient digestibility of weaned pigs
- 2417 -
APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 16(3):2415-2422.
http://www.aloki.hu ● ISSN 1589 1623 (Print) ● ISSN 1785 0037 (Online)
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1603_24152422
2018, ALÖKI Kft., Budapest, Hungary
The hydroponic system
The production of hydroponic maize fodder, that is, sprouted maize grown in a
nutrient solution was conducted under natural illumination in growth chamber as
described below. The maize used was grown for 7 days.
Planting material
Maize grains were obtained from a local market. The seeds were cleaned from debris
and other foreign materials and were subjected to a germination test to check for viability.
Clean seeds were washed, sterilized in Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2) solution and soaked in
tap water for 24 h before distribution in the trays.
Seed planting and irrigation
Seeds of maize were sown in the planting trays. The seedling rate used was 500 g of
maize grain per tray. Trays were irrigated manually with organic hydroponics nutrient
solution twice a day (07:30 and 17:30 hr) at a fixed rate of 250 ml/tray/day using a
spray gun for 20 s. Drained water were collected in plastic containers which were
placed under each planting tray and measured. The seeds were scattered uniformly
within the tray. The tray was kept in cool and well illuminated environment.
Green fodder harvesting
The sprouted seeds were grown in the greenhouse for a period of 7 days. The fully
grown fodder (Fig. 1) was then given to the pigs as whole feed.
Figure 1. Hydroponic maize fodder (Source: Adebiyi et al., 2018)
Fodder yield
Samples of the green fodder were taken weekly to determine the dry matter and
nutrient contents. The quantity of hydroponics fodder and biomass production was
recorded daily by weighing the seeds before planting and weighing the fodder produced.
Growth performance
Growth parameters of the pigs were observed and recorded throughout the
experiment. Feed intake was obtained by subtracting the leftover feed from the total
quantity of feed served. Weight gain was determined by subtracting the initial live
Adebiyi et al.: Effects of feeding hydroponics maize fodder on performance and nutrient digestibility of weaned pigs
- 2418 -
APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 16(3):2415-2422.
http://www.aloki.hu ● ISSN 1589 1623 (Print) ● ISSN 1785 0037 (Online)
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1603_24152422
2018, ALÖKI Kft., Budapest, Hungary
weight from the final live weight. Feed conversion ratio was defined as the quantity of
feed (kg) consumed to gain a unit of live weight (kg):
Feed Intake
FCR Weight Gain
Nutrient digestibility
At day 37, three animals were randomly selected from each treatment. The selected
pigs were kept in metabolic cages for 5 days. Feed intake and total faecal collection
from individual animals were recorded. The experimental feed and faecal samples were
dried. The feed and faecal samples were further analyzed for crude protein (CP), crude
fibre (CF), ether extract (EE) and ash contents using the procedure of AOAC (2000).
The nitrogen free extract (NFE) contents of the samples were obtained using the
equation:
NFE 100 – CF CP EE Ash
Statistical analysis
Data on performance and nutrient digestibility were analysed using the General
Linear Model (GLM) procedures of the statistical analysis of variance (SAS, 2010).
Duncan Multiple Range Test was applied for mean separation where there were
significant differences (P < 0.05).
Results and discussion
The results of the proximate composition of the hydroponics maize fodder are
presented in Table 2. There are changes in the nutrient content of the maize grains and
hydroponics fodder. The average dry matter (DM) content of the maize seed was
95.08% whereas the hydroponic maize fodder was 25.00%. The decrease observed in
the DM may be due to the decrease in the starch content of the hydroponics fodder.
During sprouting, starch is catabolized to soluble sugars for supporting the metabolism
of energy requirement of the growing plants for respiration and cell wall synthesis, so
any decrease in the amount of starch causes a corresponding decrease in DM (Naik et
al., 2015). This result is similar to the findings of Thadchanamoorthy et al. (2012), who
reported a DM content of 26.07% for sprouted maize fodder. The crude protein content
in the present study showed that hydroponic maize fodder contained 13.75% CP as
compared to 8.7% in maize seed. This observation has been reported by other authors
(Dung et al., 2010a; Naik et al., 2015). According to Dung et al. (2010a), the use of
nutrient solution enhances the CP content of the hydroponics fodder which is higher
than the tap water, thus leading to the uptake of nitrogenous compounds. Additionally,
sprouting has been reported to alter the amino acid profile of maize seeds and increases
the crude protein content of hydroponic fodder (Morsy et al., 2013). In the present
study, ether extract of the hydroponics maize fodder was 3.55%. The value reported in
the current study was slightly higher than the range of 3.27-3.49% obtained by Singh
(2011) and Naik et al. (2015). The increase in the EE content of the hydroponics fodder
Adebiyi et al.: Effects of feeding hydroponics maize fodder on performance and nutrient digestibility of weaned pigs
- 2419 -
APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 16(3):2415-2422.
http://www.aloki.hu ● ISSN 1589 1623 (Print) ● ISSN 1785 0037 (Online)
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1603_24152422
2018, ALÖKI Kft., Budapest, Hungary
may be due to the increase in the structural lipids and production of chlorophyll
associated with the plant growth (Naik et al., 2015).
The CF content of 14.77% was within the range of 7.35-21.20% reported by Naik et
al. (2015). Increase in CF contents of hydroponics maize fodder may be attributed to the
build-up of cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin (Cuddeford, 1989). The value of total
ash (3.33%) observed in the hydroponic maize fodder in the current study is within the
range of 1.75-3.80% reported by Naik et al. (2014). During the sprouting process, the
total ash content increases due to the absorption of minerals by the root (Dung et al.,
2010b). The NFE content observed (60.72%) was higher than that of hydroponically
sprouted grains reported by earlier workers - 1.56-3.64% (Naik et al., 2015).
Table 2. Proximate composition of hydroponics maize fodder
Parameter
Percentage (%)
Dry matter
25.00
Crude protein
13.75
Ether extract
3.55
Crude fibre
14.77
Ash
3.33
Nitrogen free extract
60.72
The results of hydroponics maize fodder on the performance of pigs are shown in
Table 3. Dietary treatments had significant effects (P < 0.05) on final weight, weight
gain and feed conversion ratio of the pigs. The final weight ranges from 9.04-17.08 kg.
Pigs fed Con100 had the highest (P < 0.05) final weight while the lowest weight was
recorded in pigs fed HM100. Feed intake and weight gain were highest (P < 0.05) in pigs
fed concentrate diet (Con100) while the lowest intake was in animals fed HM100. Feed
conversion ratio (FCR) was improved (P < 0.05) in pigs fed Con100 and Con50HM50
respectively. In the present trial, pigs fed dietary mixture of concentrate and
hydroponics maize fodder (Con50HM50) performed better than those fed solely on
sprouted fodder (HM100). Helal (2015) reported higher dry matter intake, final body
weight and improved FCR in goats fed dietary mixture of sprouted barley grains and
barley straw. Similar results were reported by Fayed (2011) and Helal (2012).
Hydroponic sprouts are rich sources of bioactive enzymes and contain grass juice
ingredients that improve the performance of livestock (Naik et al., 2013). The increase
in weight gain of pigs may be attributed to enhancement of microbial activity in the gut.
According to Kruglyakov (1989), hydroponics fodder has simpler forms of vitamin,
starch, protein and lipids which have positive effect on the performance of the animals.
Nutritional value of sprouted fodder improves due to the modification of heterogeneous
compounds into essential form (Chavan et al., 1989). Sprouting of grains has resulted
into increase in quantity and quality of protein, sugars, minerals and vitamin (Naik et
al., 2015). Weight loss was recorded in pigs fed solely on hydroponics fodder (HM100).
This observation may be due to the low DM intake of the pigs. Additionally, pigs being
monogastric cannot thrive solely on fodder-based diet.
Feeding hydroponics maize fodder to pigs led to a decrease in the total daily feeding
costs of experimental rations, Con50HM50 (#61.96) and HM100 (#53.97) as compared to
Con100 (#70.00) which was mainly a concentrate diet (Table 3). Feed costs (#/kg)
Adebiyi et al.: Effects of feeding hydroponics maize fodder on performance and nutrient digestibility of weaned pigs
- 2420 -
APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 16(3):2415-2422.
http://www.aloki.hu ● ISSN 1589 1623 (Print) ● ISSN 1785 0037 (Online)
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1603_24152422
2018, ALÖKI Kft., Budapest, Hungary
significantly reduce as the inclusion of the maize fodder increases. This result is similar
to the findings of Fayed (2011) and Helal (2012) who found the lowest feed cost and
highest profit in lambs fed dietary mixture of sprouted barley grains and Tamarix
mannifera. In terms of economic efficiency, it is more profitable (feed cost per weight
gain) to feed pigs on Con50HM50 (#228.01) as compared to Con100 (#316.4) and HM100
(#-446.91).
Table 3. Performance and cost benefit of feeding hydroponics maize fodder to pigs
Parameters
Con100
Con50HM50
HM100
SEM
P-value
Initial BW (Kg)
9.90
10.00
9.97
0.009
0.6094
Final BW (Kg)
17.08a
13.35b
9.04c
0.775
0.0026
Feed intake (DM Kg)
30.89a
12.72b
8.00c
1.334
0.0001
Weight gain
7.18a
3.46b
-0.93c
0.783
0.0021
FCR
4.52a
3.68a
-8.69b
1.425
<0.0001
*Feed cost/kg (#)
70.00
61.96
53.73
Feed cost/weight gain (#/kg)
316.4a
228.01b
-466.91c
SEM: Standard error of the mean
a,b,cMeans within the same row with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05)
BW: body weight, DM: dry matter, FCR: feed conversion ratio
*Calculated by multiplying the cost/kg of each ingredient used to formulate the diet by the quantity of
the ingredient
Nutrient digestibility of pigs fed hydroponic maize fodder is presented in Table 4.
Crude protein, crude fibre and ether extract digestibilities were improved (P < 0.05) in
animals fed Con100. However, animals fed dietary mixtures of concentrate and
hydroponics maize fodder had better (P < 0.05) CP and CF digestibility as compared to
those on HM100. Helal (2015) recorded highest digestibility coefficients of CP, CF, EE,
NDF and hemicellulose in goats fed sprouted barley. Similar results were reported by
Fayed (2011) and Naik et al. (2015). Feeding of hydroponics fodder increased the
digestibility of the nutrients which could be attributed to the tenderness of the fodder
(Naik et al., 2014). The digestibility of the nutrients of the hydroponics fodder was
comparable with the highly digestible legumes like berseem and clovers (Pandey and
Pathak, 1991). According to Chung et al. (1989), highly soluble protein and amino acids
in response to the early plant growth and enzymatic transformations of sprouted grains
are responsible for improved digestibility in animals. The low CF digestibility reported
in HM100 may be attributed to the minimal crude fibre utilization in monogastrics.
Table 4. Nutrient digestibility of pigs fed hydroponics maize fodder
Parameter
Con100
Con50HM50
HM100
SEM
P-value
CP
70.51a
66.27b
55.41c
1.50
<0.0001
EE
72.98a
67.37c
68.43b
0.57
<0.0001
CF
50.91a
48.77b
34.82c
1.68
<0.0001
Ash
39.45b
43.52a
42.63a
0.41
0.0001
SEM: standard error of the mean
a,b,cMeans within the same row with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05)
CP: crude protein, EE: ether extract, CF: crude fibre
Adebiyi et al.: Effects of feeding hydroponics maize fodder on performance and nutrient digestibility of weaned pigs
- 2421 -
APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 16(3):2415-2422.
http://www.aloki.hu ● ISSN 1589 1623 (Print) ● ISSN 1785 0037 (Online)
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1603_24152422
2018, ALÖKI Kft., Budapest, Hungary
Conclusion
Inclusion of hydroponic maize fodder in pig nutrition improved performance and
nutrient digestibility of weaned pigs. Thus, there is great potential for developing
hydroponic technology for fodder production in pig farming. Sole feeding of
hydroponic maize fodder exerted negative effects on the performance of the animals.
Further research is needed to establish the potential health benefits of hydroponic fodder
in monogastrics.
REFERENCES
[1] Adebiyi, O. A., Adefila, T. A., Adeshola, A. T. (2018): Comparative evaluation of
hydroponic maize folder and conventional basal diet on the performance, digestibility and
blood profile of weaned pig. – Nigerian Journal of Animal Production 45: 96-105.
[2] AI-Karaki, G. N., AI-Hashimi, M. (2012): Green fodder production and water use
efficiency of some forage crops under hydroponic condition. – International Scholarly
Research Notices Agronomy. DOI: 10.5402/2012/924672.
[3] AOAC (2000): Official Methods of Analysis of the AOAC, 15th ed. Methods 932.06,
925.09, 985.29, 923.03. – Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Arlington, VA,
USA.
[4] Chavan, J., Kadam, S. S. (1989): Nutritional improvement of cereals by sprouting. –
International Journal of Food Scienecs and Nutrition 28: 401-437.
[5] Chung, T. Y., Nwokolo, E. N., Sim, J. S. (1989): Compositional and digestibility changes
in sprouted barley and canola seeds. – Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 39: 267-278.
[6] Cuddeford, D. (1989): Hydroponic grass. – In Practice 11: 211-214.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/inpract.11.5.21.
[7] Dung, D. D., Godwin, I. R. Nolan, J. V. (2010a): Nutrient content and in sacco
degradation of hydroponic barley sprouts grown using nutrient solution or tap water. –
Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 9: 2432-2436.
[8] Dung, D. D., Godwin, I. R. Nolan, J. V. (2010b): Nutrient content and in sacco
digestibility of barley grain and sprouted barley. – Journal of Animal and Veterinary
Advances 9: 2485-2492.
[9] Fayed, M. (2011): Comparative study and feed evaluation of sprouted barley grains on
rice straw versus Tamarix Mannifera on performance of growing Barki lambs in Sinai. –
Journal of American Science 7: 954-961.
[10] Helal, H. G. (2012): Sprouted barley grains on rice straw and Acacia saligna and its
effect on performance of growing barki lambs in Sinai. – Proceeding of the 5th Animal
Wealth Research Conference in the Middle East & North Africa 1-3: 331-346.
[11] Helal, H. G. (2015): Sprouted barley grains on olive cake and barley straw mixture as
goat diets in Sinai. – Advances in Environmental Biology 9: 91-102.
[12] Imonikebe, U. G., Kperegbeyi, J. I (2014): Effect of substitution of maize with brewer’s
dried grain in pig starter diet on the performance of weaned pig. – Global Journal of
Agricultural Research 2: 42-48.
[13] Kruglyakov, Y. A. (1989): Construction of equipment for growing green fodder by a
hydroponic technique. – Traktory-I Sel’skokhozyaistvennye Mashiny 6: 24-27.
[14] Morsy, A. T., Abul, S. F., Emam, M. S. A (2013): Localized hydroponic green forage
technology as a climate change adaptation under Egyptian condition. – Research Journal
of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 9: 341-350.
[15] Naik, P. K., Dhuri, R. B., Swain, B. K. Singh, N. P. (2012): Nutrient changes with the
growth of hydroponics fodder maize. – Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 29: 161-163.
Adebiyi et al.: Effects of feeding hydroponics maize fodder on performance and nutrient digestibility of weaned pigs
- 2422 -
APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 16(3):2415-2422.
http://www.aloki.hu ● ISSN 1589 1623 (Print) ● ISSN 1785 0037 (Online)
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1603_24152422
2018, ALÖKI Kft., Budapest, Hungary
[16] Naik, P. K., Dhuri, R. B., Karunakaran, M., Swain, B. K. Singh, N. P. (2014): Effect of
feeding hydroponics maize fodder on digestibility of nutrients and milk production in
lactating cows. – Indian Journal of Animal Science 84: 880-883.
[17] Naik, P. K, Swain, B. K., Singh, N. P. (2015): Production and utilization of hydroponics
fodder. – Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition. 32: 1-9.
[18] Olomu, J. M., Oboh, A. S. O. (1995): Pig production in Nigeria, Principles and Practice,
pp. 1-52. – Ajachem Publication, Benin, Nigeria.
[19] Ouma, E., Dione, M., Lule, P., Roesel, K., Pezo, D. (2014): Characterization of
smallholder pig production systems in Uganda: constraints and opportunities for engaging
with market systems. – Livestock Research for Rural Development. 26 Art. no. 56.
http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd26/3/ouma26056.htm (accessed on 5 June 2015).
[20] Pandey, H. N., Pathak, N. N (1991). Nutritional evaluation of artificially grown barley
fodder in lactating crossbred cows. – Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 8: 77-78.
[21] Reddy, G. V. N., Reddy, M. R., Reddy, K. K. (1988). Nutrient utilization by milch cattle
fed on rations containing artificially grown fodder. – Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition
5: 19-22.
[22] SAS (2010): Statistical computing and data analysis with SAS (V7) Module 1. – SAS
Institute. Inc., Cary NC, USA.
[23] Singh, N. P. (2011): Technology Production and Feeding of Hydroponics Green Fodder.
– ICAR Research Complex for Goa, Old Goa.
[24] Snow, A. M., Ghaly, A. E., Snow, A. (2008) A comparative assessment of
hydroponically grown cereal crops for the purification of aquaculture waste water and the
production of fish feed. – American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3:
364-378.
[25] Suraj, A., Suhas, A., Bharti, D. (2016): Hydroponic fodder to refresh animal husbandry
sector. – www.benisonmedia.com/hydroponic-fodder-to-refresh-animal-husbandry-sector
(accessed on 12 March 2017).
[26] Tewe, O. O., Egbunike, G. N. (1998): Utilization of Cassava in Non-ruminant Livestock
Feeds. – Proc. IITA/IICA/Univ. of Ibadan Workshop on the Potential Utilization of
Cassava as Livestock Feed in Africa, IITA, Ibadan, November 14-18, 1998, pp 228-238.
[27] Thadchanamoorthy, S., Jayawardena, V. P., Pramalal, C. G. C. (2012): Evaluation of
Hydroponically Grown Maize as a Feed Source for Rabbits. – Proceedings of the 22nd
Annual Student Research Session. Department of Anim. Sci. Univ. of Peradeniya, Sri
Lanka.