Content uploaded by Thijs Dhollander
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Thijs Dhollander on Jun 13, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
0135
Investigating microstructural heterogeneity of white matter hyperintensities in Alzheimer’s
disease using single-shell 3-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution
Remika Mito , Thijs Dhollander , David Raelt , Ying Xia , Olivier Salvado , Amy Brodtmann , Christopher Rowe ,
Victor Villemagne , and Alan Connelly
Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia, Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of
Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, The Australian eHealth Research Centre, CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Brisbane, Australia, Department of Medicine,
Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy, Centre for PET, Austin Health, University of
Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Synopsis
White matter hyperintensities (WMH) observed on FLAIR MRI are highly prevalent in Alzheimer’s disease. Although often associated with cognitive
decline, such associations are highly variable, likely due to the underlying pathological heterogeneity within these lesions. Here, we explore this
potential heterogeneity in vivo in an Alzheimer’s disease cohort, by investigating relative tissue fractions obtained using single-shell 3-tissue
constrained spherical deconvolution (SS3T-CSD). We show distinguishable tissue proles of lesions based on classication as periventricular or
deep, and additionally show heterogeneity within lesions, thus highlighting the pitfalls of binary classication of WMH, and the value of
investigating their underlying diusional properties.
Introduction
White matter hyperintensities (WMH) are commonly observed on T2-weighted FLAIR images in elderly individuals, and thought to be linked to
vascular risk, age, and cognitive decline . They are more prevalent and severe in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients ; however, the clinical
signicance of these lesions is insuciently understood, with inconsistent reports of associations with cognitive decline in dementia . Such
inconsistencies may arise from underlying heterogeneity within WMH, which are typically modelled in binary fashion as either present or absent in
FLAIR images. Histologically, these lesions indeed exhibit heterogeneity in their pathological substrates despite appearing homogeneous on FLAIR,
and have been associated with axonal loss, demyelination, gliosis, and arteriolosclerosis, amongst others . Other imaging modalities such as
magnetization transfer imaging have also suggested underlying heterogeneity across lesions .
Advanced diusion imaging could provide greater in vivo insight into heterogeneity both within and across WMHs. Single-shell 3-tissue constrained
spherical deconvolution (SS3T-CSD) enables estimation of white matter (WM) bre orientation distributions (FODs) as well as grey matter (GM) and
CSF compartments. It can be used to quantify the relative WM-GM-CSF-likeness of the signal, which may relate to the underlying tissue
microstructure in pathology .
Purpose
We aimed to explore the underlying diusional properties of WMH in an AD cohort using SS3T-CSD, to determine if the technique could reveal and
characterise underlying heterogeneity across dierent lesion types, and within lesions.
Methods
DWI-data were acquired from 48 AD and 94 healthy elderly control (HC) subjects (demographics in Table 1) from the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers
and Lifestyle (AIBL) study on a 3T Siemens Trio scanner (2.3mm isotropic voxels, 60 directions at b=3000s/mm , 8 b=0 images), along with FLAIR
(0.9x1x1mm ) images. All data were denoised , corrected for motion/eddy-currents and bias elds . WMH segmentations were automatically
performed on FLAIR images using the HyperIntensity Segmentation Tool (HIST) , and classied as periventricular or deep, based on distance of
lesion volumes from ventricles (see Fig. 1).
WM FODs and GM/CSF compartments were computed with SS3T-CSD using average WM/GM/CSF response functions obtained from the data
themselves . Spatial correspondence was achieved by registering each subject’s FOD image to a study-specic FOD template, along with FLAIR and
WMH segmentations. A normal-appearing WM (NAWM) mask was created by subtracting WMH segmentations from a WM mask in template space.
The WM-GM-CSF compartments from SS3T-CSD were normalised to obtain signal fractions (that summed to 1). Mean signal fractions were
computed within periventricular WMH, deep WMH, and NAWM for each subject.
Results
AD patients exhibited signicantly greater volume in periventricular WMH, but not deep WMH, compared to HC (Table 1). In AD, mean relative
tissue fractions derived from SS3T-CSD showed dierent proles of WM-GM-CSF fractions in periventricular and deep WMH, with higher CSF-
likeness in periventricular, and higher GM-likeness in deep WMH (Fig. 2). Periventricular and deep WMH formed separate clusters based on their
relative tissue fraction proles, as did NAWM (Fig. 3). In addition, heterogeneity was consistently observed within segmented lesions (Fig. 4).
Discussion
Accumulating evidence suggests that WMH are heterogeneous in their underlying pathology, which may explain diculties in untangling their
association with clinical and pathological progression of Alzheimer's disease. Using SS3T-CSD, we reveal underlying heterogeneity within these
lesions, and identify “GM-like” compartments within WMH, which have been suggested to represent gliosis, as well as “CSF-like” compartments that
likely indicate increased interstitial uid .
We show that periventricular and deep WMH exhibit distinct WM-GM-CSF proles, and can thus be distinguished by their diusional properties
from one another (and from NAWM), likely due to diering pathological substrates. As shown in Figs. 2 and 3, periventricular WMH exhibited higher
relative CSF-like fraction than deep WMH across AD subjects, suggesting increased interstitial uid within these lesions, likely related to substantial
myelin and axonal loss. Given the higher periventricular WMH volume in AD compared to HC, these lesions could be more deleterious than deep
WMH, and more closely associated with AD as previously suggested . Deep lesions, which were equally extensive in HC as in AD, exhibited greater
1,2 1 1 3 3 1,2 4,5
4,5 1,2
1 2
3 4
5
1,2 3,4
5
3,6
7
8
9
3 2
3 10 11 12
13
8
14
9
15
GM-like fraction, which may reect gliosis in response to white matter damage. However, these classications alone did not capture the
heterogeneity within lesions, and substantial variability was consistently observed in relative WM-GM-CSF-like fractions within regions classed
together as periventricular or deep WMH (Fig. 4). We thus highlight the importance of investigating these lesions as heterogeneous entities when
probing associations with histopathology and clinical progression in AD. To this end, relative tissue fractions from SS3T-CSD will likely reect
histological dierences better than FLAIR, which could have widespread disease-based applications, and could additionally guide investigation of
lesions and their potential association with tract-specic changes.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.
References
1. Debette, S. & Markus, H. S. The clinical importance of white matter hyperintensities on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and
meta-analysis. BMJ 341, c3666 (2010).
2. Brickman, A. M. Contemplating Alzheimer’s disease and the contribution of white matter hyperintensities. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 13, 1–9
(2013).
3. Scheltens, P. et al. Histopathologic correlates of white matter changes on MRI in Alzheimer’s disease and normal aging. Neurology 45, 883–888
(1995).
4. Yoshita, M. et al. Extent and distribution of white matter hyperintensities in normal aging, MCI, and AD. Neurology 67, 2192–2198 (2006).
5. Schmidt, R. et al. MRI-detected white matter lesions: do they really matter? J. Neural Transm. 118, 673–681 (2011).
6. Gouw, A. A. et al. Heterogeneity of white matter hyperintensities in Alzheimer’s disease: post-mortem quantitative MRI and neuropathology.
Brain 131, 3286–3298 (2008).
7. Spilt, A. et al. Not all age-related white matter hyperintensities are the same: a magnetization transfer imaging study. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 27,
1964–1968 (2006).
8. Dhollander, T. & Connelly, A. A novel iterative approach to reap the benets of multi-tissue CSD from just single-shell (+ b= 0) diusion MRI data.
Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Singapore, Singapore 24, 3010 (2016).
9. Dhollander, T., Raelt, D. & Connelly, A. Towards interpretation of 3-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution results in pathology. in Proc. Intl.
Soc. Mag. Reson. Med 25, 1815 (2017).
10. Veraart, J., Fieremans, E. & Novikov, D. S. Diusion MRI noise mapping using random matrix theory. Magn. Reson. Med. (2016).
11. Andersson, J. L. R. & Sotiropoulos, S. N. An integrated approach to correction for o-resonance eects and subject movement in diusion MR
imaging. Neuroimage 125, 1063–1078 (2016).
12. Tustison, N. J. et al. N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 29, 1310–1320 (2010).
13. Manjón, J. V. et al. HIST: HyperIntensity Segmentation Tool. in Patch-Based Techniques in Medical Imaging 92–99 (Springer, Cham, 2016).
14. Dhollander, T., Raelt, D. & Connelly, A. Unsupervised 3-tissue response function estimation from single-shell or multi-shell diusion MR data
without a co-registered T1 image. Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Workshop on Breaking the Barriers
of Diusion MRI 5, (2016).
15. Fazekas, F., Chawluk, J. B., Alavi, A., Hurtig, H. I. & Zimmerman, R. A. MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer’s dementia and normal aging.
American journal of roentgenology 149, 351–356 (1987).
16. Hamilton, N. ggtern: An Extension to ‘ggplot2’, for the Creation of Ternary Diagrams. R package version 2.2.2. https://CRAN.R-
project.org/package=ggtern (2017).
Figures
Table 1: Demographic data. Data presented as mean (SD) or number of males (%) for sex. Reported p-values from student’s t-tests for age and
intracranial volume (ICV), chi-square test for independence for sex, and one-way ANCOVA (with age and ICV as covariates) for PVWMH
(periventricular WMH), DWMH (deep WMH) and total WMH volumes. No signicant dierences were observed between groups for age, gender, ICV,
or DWMH volume. PVWMH volume was signicantly greater in AD compared to controls (as was total WMH volume, as expected).
Figure 1: Appearance of WMH on FLAIR, segmentation classications, and tissue compartments from SS3T-CSD. Left: WMH are typically segmented
from FLAIR images, where they appear hyperintense. Middle: Segmentations were classied into “periventricular” and “deep” WMH based on the
minimum and average distance of a lesion from the ventricles (classied as periventricular if the minimum distance < 5.0 mm or average distance <
20.0 mm, and deep otherwise). Right: SS3T-CSD enables modelling of WM FODs and GM/CSF compartments. Heterogeneity with regard to the
underlying WM-GM-CSF-likeness of WMH can be observed with SS3T-CSD.
Figure 2: Boxplots showing relative signal fractions within WMH and NAWM. The mean relative signal fractions for WM-GM-CSF for all AD subjects
(n=48) are summarised into boxplots. Boxplots display median, rst and third quartiles, and 95% condence interval of the median across subjects.
NAWM exhibits high WM-like fraction as expected, with relatively low GM/CSF-like signal fractions. In contrast, WMHs exhibited higher GM/CSF-like
signal fractions. Periventricular WMH exhibited higher CSF-likeness compared to deep WMH, which exhibited higher GM-likeness. These lesions
could be distinguished based on their relative signal fraction proles, as similarly shown in Fig. 3.
Figure 3: Ternary plot exhibiting relative signal fractions within lesions and NAWM. For each subject, the periventricular WMH (red circles), deep
WMH (green triangles), and NAWM (blue squares) are displayed on a ternary plot (created using ggtern package in R) , with the location
corresponding to the relative WM-GM-CSF fraction of the lesions (or NAWM). The relative tissue fraction (as a percentage) is shown along the left
(WM-like), right (GM-like), and bottom (CSF-like) axes. Remarkably, the periventricular WMH, deep WMH, and NAWM appear in distinct clusters,
exhibiting their dierent proles with regard to relative tissue fractions obtained from SS3T-CSD diusion data.
Figure 4: Heterogeneity within WMH. WMH appear as a homogeneous lesion on FLAIR images from which they are most commonly segmented
(segmentation outline shown). Tissue maps derived from SS3T-CSD show that there is heterogeneity within a single lesion with regard to the
relative tissue components. The insets on the left display the heterogeneity of the relative tissue compartments within the same lesion
segmentation. The underlying pathological changes within these lesions is also likely to be heterogeneous, of which the diusional changes are
likely reective.
16
Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 26 (2018)
0135