Conference PaperPDF Available

Using paired teaching for earthquake education in schools

Authors:

Abstract

Disaster education plays a key role in reducing vulnerability and increasing safety and community resilience to disaster risks. Geoscientists can inform mitigation and resilience strategies as they collect and analyze data relevant to disaster risks. However, many of the approaches they use to engage with the public involve one-way, asymmetric communication, meaning information is delivered but not exchanged (e.g., talking to the media, writing books, producing informational videos, and giving lectures). In school settings, geoscientists often engage in one-way communication by following the traditional lecturing format to communicate with students, giving few opportunities for interactions and feedback. Though this approach can be effective in communicating some factual information, it ignores the important role of the students and teachers in disaster risk reduction, response, and recovery. To address this issue, we have created 10 learning videos that engage geoscientists, students and teachers in earthquake science, hazards, and safety. The paired teaching technique encourages the in-class teacher to collaborate with the video teacher (a geoscientist) to help students understand the physical processes related to earthquakes (e.g., plate motions and faults) and the self-protective steps they can take to mitigate hazards (e.g., preparing an emergency response plan). Each video is designed to be viewed in short segments. In each segment, the geoscientist asks questions that will be explored through hands-on activities under the guidance of the in-class teacher in between segments. The first six videos introduce students to fundamental scientific concepts behind earthquakes (e.g., Earth's interior, plate tectonics, properties of Earth's materials, faulting, elastic rebound theory, and seismic energy). These concepts are taught through hands-on learning where students use toys (e.g., silly putty, slinky) and build simple models to visualize what happens inside the Earth and along a fault system when earthquakes happen. The remaining four videos focus on concepts related to earthquake hazards (e.g., landslides, liquefaction, structural and nonstructural hazards) and safety measures (e.g., drills and planning). In these videos, students explore the effects of different hazards by building and testing landslide, liquefaction and structural models on a shake table. All videos and supporting materials are freely available on the YouTube channel of the European Geo-science Union (https://www.youtube.com/user/EuroGeosciencesUnion) and as DVDs upon request.
Geophysical Research Abstracts
Vol. 20, EGU2018-7858, 2018
EGU General Assembly 2018
© Author(s) 2018. CC Attribution 4.0 license.
Using paired teaching for earthquake education in schools
Solmaz Mohadjer (1), Sebastian Mutz (1), Ruth Amey (4), Reinhard Drews (1), Matthew Kemp (2), Peter Kloos
(3), Lewis Mitchell (4), Matthias Nettesheim (1), Sophie Gill (5), Jessica Starke (1), and Todd A. Ehlers (1)
(1) Department of Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Germany (solmaz.mohadjer@uni-tuebingen.de), (2) Department of
Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom, (3) ParsQuake Project, Tübingen, Germany, (4) School of Earth
and Environment, University of Leeds, United Kingdom , (5) Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, United
Kingdom
Disaster education plays a key role in reducing vulnerability and increasing safety and community resilience
to disaster risks. Geoscientists can inform mitigation and resilience strategies as they collect and analyze data
relevant to disaster risks. However, many of the approaches they use to engage with the public involve one-way,
asymmetric communication, meaning information is delivered but not exchanged (e.g., talking to the media,
writing books, producing informational videos, and giving lectures). In school settings, geoscientists often engage
in one-way communication by following the traditional lecturing format to communicate with students, giving
few opportunities for interactions and feedback. Though this approach can be effective in communicating some
factual information, it ignores the important role of the students and teachers in disaster risk reduction, response,
and recovery.
To address this issue, we have created 10 learning videos that engage geoscientists, students and teachers
in earthquake science, hazards, and safety. The paired teaching technique encourages the in-class teacher to
collaborate with the video teacher (a geoscientist) to help students understand the physical processes related to
earthquakes (e.g., plate motions and faults) and the self-protective steps they can take to mitigate hazards (e.g.,
preparing an emergency response plan). Each video is designed to be viewed in short segments. In each segment,
the geoscientist asks questions that will be explored through hands-on activities under the guidance of the in-class
teacher in between segments.
The first six videos introduce students to fundamental scientific concepts behind earthquakes (e.g., Earth’s
interior, plate tectonics, properties of Earth’s materials, faulting, elastic rebound theory, and seismic energy).
These concepts are taught through hands-on learning where students use toys (e.g., silly putty, slinky) and build
simple models to visualize what happens inside the Earth and along a fault system when earthquakes happen. The
remaining four videos focus on concepts related to earthquake hazards (e.g., landslides, liquefaction, structural
and nonstructural hazards) and safety measures (e.g., drills and planning). In these videos, students explore the
effects of different hazards by building and testing landslide, liquefaction and structural models on a shake table.
All videos and supporting materials are freely available on the YouTube channel of the European Geo-
science Union (https://www.youtube.com/user/EuroGeosciencesUnion) and as DVDs upon request.
Article
Full-text available
In this study, we have created 10 geoscience video lessons that follow the paired-teaching pedagogical approach. This method is used to supplement the standard school curriculum with video lessons, instructed by geoscientists from around the world, coupled with activities carried out under the guidance of classroom teachers. The video lessons introduce students to the scientific concepts behind earthquakes (e.g. the Earth's interior, plate tectonics, faulting, and seismic energy), earthquake hazards, and mitigation measures (e.g. liquefaction, structural, and non-structural earthquake hazards). These concepts are taught through hands-on learning, where students use everyday materials to build models to visualize basic Earth processes that produce earthquakes and explore the effects of different hazards. To evaluate the effectiveness of these virtual lessons, we tested our videos in school classrooms in Dushanbe (Tajikistan) and London (United Kingdom). Before and after the video implementations, students completed questionnaires that probed their knowledge on topics covered by each video, including the Earth's interior, tectonic plate boundaries, and non-structural hazards. Our assessment results indicate that, while the paired-teaching video lessons appear to enhance student knowledge and understanding of some concepts (e.g. Earth's interior, earthquake location forecasting, and non-structural hazards), they bring little change to their views on the causes of earthquakes and their relation to plate boundaries. In general, the difference between UK and Tajik students' level of knowledge prior to and after video testing is more significant than the difference between pre- and post-knowledge for each group. This could be due to several factors affecting curriculum testing (e.g. level of teachers' participation and classroom culture) and students' learning of content (e.g. pre-existing hazards knowledge and experience). To maximize the impact of school-based risk reduction education, curriculum developers must move beyond innovative content and pedagogical approaches, take classroom culture into consideration, and instil skills needed for participatory learning and discovery.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.