Content uploaded by Charles B. Chang
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Charles B. Chang on Jun 05, 2019
Content may be subject to copyright.
427
Introduction
+RZDUHVSHHFKVRXQGVDQGSDWWHUQVPDVWHUHGLQDVHFRQGODQJXDJH/HVSHFLDOO\ZKHQ
WKH/LVOHDUQHGODWHULQOLIH"7KLVTXHVWLRQLVDWWKHKHDUWRIUHVHDUFKLQ/VSHHFKOHDUQLQJ
DQLQWHUGLVFLSOLQDU\ ¿HOG DWWKH QH[XV RISKRQHWLFV SKRQRORJ\FRJQLWLYHSV\FKRORJ\/
acquisition, and applied linguistics. The broad goal of L2 speech research is to understand
the mechanisms and processes underlying L2 speech development, with a view toward
applications in language learning and language pedagogy. This chapter provides an over-
YLHZ RI WKH PDMRU WKHRULHV DQG ¿QGLQJV LQ WKH ¿HOG RI / VSHHFK OHDUQLQJ )RU UHDVRQV
RI VSDFH WKH GLVFXVVLRQ IRFXVHV SULPDULO\ RQ IRXU PDLQ FRQFHSWXDO IUDPHZRUNV DPRQJ
WKHPRVWGHWDLOHGDQGZLGHO\WHVWHGLQWKH¿HOGWKH3HUFHSWXDO$VVLPLODWLRQ0RGHO±/
WKH1DWLYH/DQJXDJH0DJQHW7KHRU\WKH$XWRPDWLF6HOHFWLYH3HUFHSWLRQ0RGHO DQG WKH
6SHHFK/HDUQLQJ 0RGHO 7KHVHIUDPHZRUNV GLIIHU LQWHUPV RI HPSLULFDOIRFXV LQFOXGLQJ
WKHW\SHRI OHDUQHU HJEHJLQQHUYV DGYDQFHG DQG WDUJHWPRGDOLW\HJSHUFHSWLRQ YV
SURGXFWLRQDQG LQ WHUPVRIWKHRUHWLFDODVVXPSWLRQVVXFKDVWKHEDVLF XQLWRUZLQGRZRI
DQDO\VLVWKDWLVUHOHYDQWHJDUWLFXODWRU\JHVWXUHVSRVLWLRQVSHFL¿FDOORSKRQHV
To evaluate the predictive differences among these theories, this chapter discusses a number
of empirical studies that have investigated L2 speech primarily at a segmental level. However,
it should be pointed out that research on L2 speech learning addresses many different aspects
RI VSHHFK LQFOXGLQJ RYHUDOO DFFHQW HJ <HQL.RPVKLDQ )OHJH DQG /LX VHJPHQW
VHTXHQFHVLHSKRQRWDFWLFV'XSRX[+LURVH.DNHKL3DOOLHUDQG0HKOHU$OWHQEHUJ
D'DYLGVRQ+DOOpDQG%HVWDQGKLJKHUOHYHOSURVRGLFVWUXFWXUHHJZRUG
ERXQGDULHV DQG FURVVZRUG VDQGKL SKHQRPHQD $OWHQEHUJ E =VLJD 6FKZDUW]
)XUWKHUEHFDXVHRWKHUUHFHQWSXEOLFDWLRQVLQ/SKRQHWLFVDQGSKRQRORJ\DOUHDG\SUR-
YLGHH[WHQVLYH UHYLHZVRIHPSLULFDO¿QGLQJVLQWKLV DUHDHJ(FNPDQ%URVHORZ DQG
.DQJ&RODQWRQL6WHHOH DQG (VFXGHUR 6LPRQHW 'DYLGVRQ %RKQ
WKHFXUUHQWFRQWULEXWLRQLVRULHQWHGLQVWHDGWRZDUGSUHVHQWLQJDV\QWKHVLVRIWKHRUHWLFDO
approaches to the study of L2 speech. Thus, although several empirical studies are covered in
a fair amount of detail, we will concentrate primarily on exploring the points of convergence
and divergence, as well as the complementarities, among theories of L2 speech.
15
The phonetics of second
language learning and
bilingualism
Charles B. Chang
Charles B. Chang
428
Despite the ways in which theories of L2 speech differ from one another, three recurring
themes emerge from the L2 speech literature. First, the learning of a target L2 structure
VHJPHQWIHDWXUH SKRQRWDFWLFFRQVWUDLQWSURVRGLFSDWWHUQHWFLV LQÀXHQFHGE\SKRQHWLF
DQGRUSKRQRORJLFDOVLPLODULW\WRVWUXFWXUHVLQWKHQDWLYHODQJXDJH/,QSDUWLFXODU//
VLPLODULW\H[LVWVDW PXOWLSOH OHYHOVDQGGRHVQRWQHFHVVDULO\EHQH¿W/RXWFRPHV 6HFRQG
the role played by certain factors, such as acoustic-phonetic similarity between close L1
and L2 sounds, changes over the course of learning, such that advanced learners may differ
from novice learners with respect to the effect of a given variable on observed L2 behavior.
7KLUGWKHFRQQHFWLRQEHWZHHQ/SHUFHSWLRQDQGSURGXFWLRQLQVRIDUDVWKHWZRDUHK\SRWK-
HVL]HGWR EH OLQNHGGLIIHUVVLJQL¿FDQWO\IURP WKHSHUFHSWLRQSURGXFWLRQOLQNVREVHUYHGLQ
L1 acquisition. Each of these themes is addressed in more detail in the rest of the chapter.
$VDQLQWHUGLVFLSOLQDU\DUHDRILQTXLU\/VSHHFKUHVHDUFKLVLQWULQVLFDOO\OLQNHGQRWRQO\
to experimental advances in phonetics and laboratory phonology, but also to theoretical
YLHZVRIWKHSURFHVVDQGRXWFRPHVRI/DFTXLVLWLRQ&UXFLDOO\WKHYLHZRI/DFTXLVLWLRQ
DGRSWHGLQWKLV FKDSWHU LV RQHWKDWLGHQWL¿HVWKH VWDUW RI /DFTXLVLWLRQZLWKWKH RQVHW RI
bilingualism. That is, the chapter considers L2 learners both as acquirers of a new language
and as individuals with two languages, for two reasons. First, many individuals exposed
WRDQ/ZLOOHYHQWXDOO\ EHFRPH SUR¿FLHQW ELOLQJXDOV DQGWKHUHLVQRFOHDUGLYLGLQJ OLQH
EHWZHHQ³/ OHDUQHU´DQG ³ELOLQJXDO´6HFRQG JLYHQWKDW WKH PDMRULW\ RI WKH ZRUOG FDQ
EHGHVFULEHGDV ELOLQJXDO RU PXOWLOLQJXDO 7XFNHUELOLQJXDOLVPUDWKHUWKDQPRQR-
lingualism, may be the most appropriate point of departure for considering interlanguage
phenomena in L2 learning. As such, this chapter situates the study of L2 speech within the
long tradition of bilingualism research on bidirectional cross-linguistic interactions. Under
WKLVYLHZLWEHQH¿WV / VSHHFKUHVHDUFK WRFRQVLGHU QRW RQO\/ RXWFRPHV EXW DOVR WKH
PDQQHULQZKLFKOHDUQHUV¶GHYHORSLQJ/NQRZOHGJHPD\LQÀXHQFHWKHLUNQRZOHGJHDQG
XVHRIWKH/HJ&RRN7KXVLWVKRXOGEHQRWHGWKDWDOWKRXJKQRWFRYHUHGKHUHLQ
GHWDLOWKHEXUJHRQLQJOLWHUDWXUHRQ/SKRQHWLFDQGSKRQRORJLFDOFKDQJHLQ/OHDUQHUVIRU
UHYLHZVVHH&HODWDLQSUHVV&KDQJLQSUHVVGH/HHXZLQSUHVVLVUHOHYDQWWRWKHVWXG\
of L2 speech because it can provide unique insights into learners’ observed trajectory of L2
development.
In the rest of this chapter, we review the principles of the four selected conceptual frame-
ZRUNVIRUWKHVWXG\RI/VSHHFKDQGGLVFXVVWZRWRSLFVWKDWUHPDLQDUHDVRIDFWLYHUHVHDUFK
LQ/SKRQHWLFOHDUQLQJDQGELOLQJXDOLVPDWKHUROHRIWKH/±LQSDUWLFXODUWKHW\SHDQG
GHJUHHRIVLPLODULW\EHWZHHQ WKH / DQG/±LQ / SKRQHWLF GHYHORSPHQWDQGEOLQNV
between L2 perception and L2 production.
Theoretical frameworks
7KHWKHRUHWLFDOUHYLHZ¿UVWH[DPLQHVIUDPHZRUNVIRFXVLQJRQ/SHUFHSWLRQDQGWKHQSUR-
FHHGVWRWKHPDLQIUDPHZRUNDGGUHVVLQJ/SURGXFWLRQ:HEHJLQZLWKDUJXDEO\WKHPRVW
widely tested theory of nonnative and L2 speech perception, the Perceptual Assimilation
0RGHO±/
The Perceptual Assimilation Model – L2
2QH RI WKH PRVW LQÀXHQWLDO WKHRULHV RI / VSHHFK SHUFHSWLRQ WKH 3HUFHSWXDO $VVLPLOD-
WLRQ0RGHO ± /3$0/ZDV SURSRVHG E\%HVW DQG 7\OHU H[SDQGLQJ XSRQ DQ
earlier theory of nonnative speech perception focused on naive listeners, the Perceptual
Second language learning and bilingualism
429
$VVLPLODWLRQ0RGHO3$0%HVW3$0/H[SDQGVXSRQ 3$0E\ LQFRUSRUDWLQJ D
UROHIRUWKHDGGLWLRQDONQRZOHGJHWKDW/OHDUQHUVEXWQRWQDLYHPRQROLQJXDOVKDYHDERXW
WKHWDUJHWODQJXDJHHJSKRQRORJLFDONQRZOHGJH+RZHYHUWKH WZR PRGHOV DUH VLPLODU
LQ WKHLU DVVXPSWLRQ RI DUWLFXODWRU\ JHVWXUHV DV WKH EDVLF SKRQHWLF XQLW D YLHZ IROORZLQJ
from the direct realist approach to speech perception; for further discussion, see Best, 1995,
SS±LQWKHLUIRFXVRQSHUFHSWLRQDQGLQWKHLUDFFRXQWRI/SHUFHSWXDOSDWWHUQVLQ
terms of SHUFHSWXDODVVLPLODWLRQV to L1 sounds.
7KHFRUHORJLFRI3$0/LVWKDWVRXQGVRIDQ/DUHGLIIHUHQWLDOO\GLVFULPLQDEOHDFFRUG-
LQJWRKRZWKH\DUHSHUFHSWXDOO\DVVLPLODWHGWRLHLQWHUSUHWHGLQWHUPVRI/VRXQGV7KH
theory sets out a typology of diverse ways in which two L2 sounds x and y can be assimi-
lated to L1 sounds, which lead to different degrees of success discriminating x and yVHH
Table 15.1,QWKHFDVHRI7ZR&DWHJRU\7&DVVLPLODWLRQx and y are assimilated to two
different L1 sound categories and, given that there is no pressure from the L1 toward per-
FHSWXDOFRQÀDWLRQRIx and y, L2 learners are able to discriminate them with a high degree of
DFFXUDF\2QWKHRWKHUKDQGLQ6LQJOH&DWHJRU\6&DVVLPLODWLRQx and y are assimilated
WRWKHVDPH/VRXQGFDWHJRU\HDFKZLWKDVLPLODUO\KLJKJRRGQHVVRI¿WLHx and y are
ERWKSKRQHWLFDOO\ FORVH WRWKH/DWWUDFWRULQWKLVFDVHWKHUH LVVWURQJSUHVVXUHIURPWKH
/WRZDUGSHUFHSWXDOFRQÀDWLRQRIx and y, and consequently L2 learners discriminate them
SRRUO\)LQDOO\LQ&DWHJRU\*RRGQHVV&*DVVLPLODWLRQx and y are assimilated to the same
/VRXQGFDWHJRU\EXWZLWKGLIIHUHQWGHJUHHVRI¿WLHx and y are unequally close to the
/DWWUDFWRU OHDGLQJ WRGLVFULPLQDWLRQ SHUIRUPDQFH WKDWLV LQWHUPHGLDWH EHWZHHQWKH7&
DQG6&FDVHVUDQJLQJIURPIDLUWRJRRG)RUH[DPSOHIRU/(QJOLVKOLVWHQHUVWKH=XOX
FRQWUDVWVEHWZHHQODWHUDOIULFDWLYHVܾDQG݀ELODELDOVWRSVEDQGܦDQGYHODUVWRSVNh/
DQGN¶ ZHUH SUHGLFWHGUHVSHFWLYHO\WRXQGHUJR7& DVVLPLODWLRQ WRD YRLFHOHVV (QJOLVK
IULFDWLYHVXFK DV ݕDQG D YRLFHG (QJOLVKIULFDWLYH VXFK DVݤ &* DVVLPLODWLRQERWK WR
(QJOLVKE ZLWKGLIIHUHQW GHJUHHV RI¿W DQG 6& DVVLPLODWLRQ ERWK WR (QJOLVKN ZLWK
VLPLODUGHJUHHVRI¿WDQGLQGHHG(QJOLVKOLVWHQHUV¶GLVFULPLQDWLRQRIWKHVHFRQWUDVWVZDV
UHVSHFWLYHO\JRRGVRPHZKDWOHVVJRRGDQGSRRU%HVW0F5REHUWVDQG*RRGHOO
,QDGGLWLRQ WR WKH7&6&DQG&* W\SHV RISHUFHSWXDODVVLPLODWLRQZKLFKDOOLQYROYH
both members of the L2 sound contrast being assimilated to L1 sounds, it is possible for
one or both members of an L2 contrast not to be assimilated to L1 sounds. In Uncatego-
UL]HG&DWHJRUL]HG8&DVVLPLODWLRQ RQO\ RQH RIWKH/ VRXQGV LV LGHQWL¿HGZLWKDQ/
VRXQGZKLOHWKHRWKHULVSHUFHLYHGDVXQOLNHDQ\/VRXQG%HFDXVHKHUHWKH/FRQWUDVW
UHGXFHVWRDQRSSRVLWLRQEHWZHHQ/OLNHDQGQRQ/OLNHVRXQGV/OHDUQHUVDUHDEOHWR
GLVFULPLQDWHWKHVRXQGVZHOOHJ7KDLEDFNXQURXQGHGYRZHOV݁DQGܶIRU/(QJOLVK
OLVWHQHUV7\OHU%HVW)DEHUDQG/HYLWW+RZHYHULQ8QFDWHJRUL]HG8QFDWHJRUL]HG
Table 15.1 7\SHVRISHUFHSWXDOQRQDVVLPLODWLRQSRVLWHGLQ3$0/ 7&7ZR&DWHJRU\&* &DWHJRU\
*RRGQHVV6&6LQJOH&DWHJRU\8&8QFDWHJRUL]HG&DWHJRUL]HG888QFDWHJRUL]HG8QFDWHJRUL]HG
1$1RQ$VVLPLODEOH$FFXUDF\VFDOH SRRU IDLU JRRG H[FHOOHQW
TC CG SC 8& 88 1$
/VRXQGVSHUFHLYHGDVVSHHFK" yes yes yes yes yes no
/VRXQGVERWKDVVLPLODWHGWR/" yes yes yes no no no
'LIIHUHQFHLQJRRGQHVVRI¿WWR/" no yes no yes í í
'LVFULPLQDWLRQDFFXUDF\±VFDOH 4± 14± ±
Charles B. Chang
430
88DVVLPLODWLRQQHLWKHURIWKH/VRXQGVLVSHUFHLYHGDVVLPLODUWRDQ/VRXQG,QWKLV
FDVHWKHUHIRUHWKHUHLVQRSRVVLELOLW\RIXVLQJDIUDPHZRUNRI³/OLNH´YV³QRQ/OLNH´
and discrimination accuracy ranges from poor to intermediate, depending on the degree to
ZKLFKWKHPHPEHUVRIWKHFRQWUDVWSDUWLDOO\UHVHPEOHWKHVDPH/VRXQGRUGLIIHUHQW/
sounds.
)LQDOO\LWLVSRVVLEOHIRU/VRXQGVQRW RQO\ WR UHVLVW LGHQWL¿FDWLRQ ZLWK DQ /VRXQG
EXWDOVR WREH SHUFHLYHGDV QRQOLQJXLVWLF,Q WKH UDUH 1RQ$VVLPLODEOH 1$ FDVH RI /
sounds, the L2 sounds are so divergent from any member of the L1 sound inventory that
they are effectively treated as non-speech. In this case, discrimination of the L2 contrast
PD\EHQH¿W IURP DQRQVSHHFKPRGHRIDXGLWRU\SURFHVVLQJWKDWKDV QRWEHHQZDUSHGE\
OLQJXLVWLFFDWHJRULHVVHHQH[WVHFWLRQ7KH1DWLYH/DQJXDJH0DJQHW7KHRU\7KLVSRVVLELO-
LW\ZDVHOHJDQWO\GHPRQVWUDWHG LQ D VHULHV RI VWXGLHV RQ QRQQDWLYHFOLFNSHUFHSWLRQ%HVW
0F5REHUWVDQG6LWKROH%HVW7UDLOO&DUWHU+DUULVRQDQG)DEHU&RQWUDU\WR
WKHK\SRWKHVLVWKDWQRQQDWLYHFOLFNVZRXOGEHPRVWHDVLO\GLVFULPLQDWHGE\VSHDNHUVDOUHDG\
IDPLOLDUZLWKFOLFNVIURPWKHLU / VSHDNHUV ZLWK / FOLFNV WHQGHGWRGRUHODWLYHO\SRRUO\
RQQRQQDWLYHFOLFNGLVFULPLQDWLRQE\FRQWUDVW/(QJOLVKVSHDNHUVZKRKDGQRH[SHULHQFH
ZLWKFOLFNV SHUIRUPHG UHODWLYHO\ ZHOO 7KH H[SODQDWLRQIRU WKLVUHVXOW OLHV LQWKH IDFW WKDW
FOLFNODQJXDJHVSHDNHUVDUHVXEMHFWDWOHDVWVRPHRIWKHWLPHWR6&DVVLPLODWLRQGXHWR/
FOLFNFDWHJRULHVWKDWVHUYHDVSHUFHSWXDODWWUDFWRUVIRUQRQQDWLYHFOLFNV1RQFOLFNODQJXDJH
VSHDNHUVVXFKDV/(QJOLVKVSHDNHUVKRZHYHUDUHXQHQFXPEHUHGE\/FOLFNFDWHJRULHV
DQGIXUWKHUPRUHKDYHQRWKLQJLQWKHLU/LQYHQWRU\WKDWUHPRWHO\UHVHPEOHVFOLFNVDXGLWR-
ULO\7KHUHIRUHWKH\DUHIUHHWRGLVFULPLQDWHWKHQRQQDWLYHFOLFNFRQWUDVWVSXUHO\LQWHUPVRI
their acoustic characteristics.
$VIRUWKHEDVLVRISHUFHSWXDODVVLPLODWLRQRI/VRXQGVWR/VRXQGV3$0/SRVLWV
that L2-to-L1 mapping may occur due to cross-linguistic similarity at a gestural level
DVZHOODV DW D SKRQRORJLFDOOHYHO,QGHHGIRU / OHDUQHUV DVRSSRVHGWRQRQOHDUQHUV
DEVWUDFWSKRQRORJLFDO NQRZOHGJH RI WKH/ LV OLNHO\WR SOD\ DQ LPSRUWDQWUROH LQ HVWDE-
lishing equivalences between L1 and L2 sounds; we will return to this topic later in the
FKDSWHU%URDGO\VSHDNLQJKRZHYHUWKHEDVLVIRUSHUFHSWXDODVVLPLODWLRQFDQEHYLHZHGDV
proximity between L2 sounds and L1 attractors. In the next section, we introduce a theory
ZKLFKOLNH 3$0/IRUPDOL]HVWKHUROHRI/ DWWUDFWRUVLQVSHHFKSHUFHSWLRQEXWZLWK
respect to the internal structure of L1 phonological categories and the acoustic perceptual
space.
The Native Language Magnet Theory
Developed originally to account for L1 perceptual development in infants, Kuhl’s Native
/DQJXDJH0DJQHW1/07KHRU\KDVEHHQDSSOLHGWRWKHVWXG\RI/VSHHFKDVZHOO.XKO
DQG,YHUVRQ(OOLV,QSDUWLFXODUWKH UHYLVHG DQG H[SDQGHG 1DWLYH /DQJXDJH
0DJQHW7KHRU\ 1/0H HQXPHUDWHV D QXPEHU RIEDVLFSULQFLSOHVVHYHUDORIZKLFKKHOS
DFFRXQWIRUDVSHFWV RI /SHUFHSWLRQ.XKO HW DO)LUVW WKH /OHDUQHUSURJUHVVHV
IURPSHUFHLYLQJVSHHFKLQDXQLYHUVDOPDQQHULHQRWVSHFLDOL]HGIRUWKH/WRSHUFHLYLQJ
LWLQDQ/VSHFL¿FPDQQHUDWUDQVLWLRQWKDWLVGULYHQERWKE\WKHGHWHFWLRQRIGLVWULEXWLRQDO
patterns in the ambient L1 input and by the enhanced acoustic properties of infant-directed
speech. Second, exposure to the L1 leads to a neural commitment to L1 speech patterns,
ZKLFKELDVHVIXWXUHVSHHFKOHDUQLQJFIWKH³VHOHFWLYHSHUFHSWLRQURXWLQH´RIWKH$XWRPDWLF
6HOHFWLYH 3HUFHSWLRQ 0RGHO GLVFXVVHG LQ WKH QH[W VHFWLRQ 7KLUG / SKRQHWLF OHDUQLQJ
LVLQÀXHQFHG E\VRFLDOLQWHUDFWLRQ)RXUWK/DFTXLVLWLRQ LQYROYHVIRUPLQJOLQNVEHWZHHQ
Second language learning and bilingualism
431
VSHHFKSHUFHSWLRQDQGVSHHFK SURGXFWLRQ LH SHUFHSWLRQSURGXFWLRQ OLQNV DUHGHYHORSHG
WKURXJKH[SHULHQFHUDWKHUWKDQEHLQJLQQDWH1 Fifth, early perceptual abilities for, as well as
neural responses to, native and nonnative sound contrasts are predictors of L1 development.
,QSDUWLFXODUEHWWHUSHUFHSWXDODELOLWLHVHJEHWWHUGLVFULPLQDWLRQSHUIRUPDQFHIRUWKH/
predict faster L1 development, whereas better perceptual abilities for nonnative speech pre-
dict slower L1 development.
7KH¿UVWDQGVHFRQGRIWKHSUHFHGLQJSULQFLSOHVUHODWHWRWZRFRUHFRQFHSWVUHOHYDQWIRU
the study of L2 speech: SHUFHSWXDOZDUSLQJ and the SHUFHSWXDOPDJQHW. Perceptual warping
refers to the way in which the acoustic perceptual space related to a given type of speech
VRXQGHJDPXOWLGLPHQVLRQDO IRUPDQW VSDFH LQ WKH FDVHRIYRZHOVLVWUDQVIRUPHGZLWK
WKH DFFXPXODWLRQ RI OLQJXLVWLF LH / H[SHULHQFH ZKLOH D SHUFHSWXDO PDJQHW LV D VSH-
FL¿FSDUWRIWKDWPRGL¿HGSHUFHSWXDOVSDFH±QDPHO\WKHSURWRW\SHRIDFRQWUDVWLYHVRXQG
category. L1 learners develop such prototypes for speech sounds early in life during their
distributional analysis of L1 input, and these prototypes act as attractors for newly per-
FHLYHGVSHHFKWRNHQVOHDGLQJWRWKHREVHUYDWLRQRIDVRFDOOHG³SHUFHSWXDOPDJQHWHIIHFW´LQ
KXPDQVRQO\.XKO7KHSHUFHSWXDOPDJQHWHIIHFWGHVFULEHVHVVHQWLDOO\WKHVDPHW\SH
RISKHQRPHQRQDVSHUFHSWXDODVVLPLODWLRQDVLQ3$0/H[FHSWWKDWWKHSHUFHSWXDOPDJ-
net effect does not refer to cross-linguistic assimilation per se; rather, the idea is that, once
there are phonological categories in place, listeners are biased to perceive incoming speech
input in terms of these categories as opposed to objectively, without reference to categories.
7KLVHIIHFWWKXVXQGHUOLHVERWKWKH³FDWHJRULFDOSHUFHSWLRQ´RI/VSHHFK/LEHUPDQ+DU-
ULV+RIIPDQDQG*ULI¿WKDVZHOODVWKHSHUFHSWXDODVVLPLODWLRQRI/VRXQGVWR/
categories.
&UXFLDOO\KRZHYHUWKHVWUHQJWKRIWKHSHUFHSWXDOPDJQHWHIIHFWGLIIHUVDFFRUGLQJWRSUR[-
LPLW\WRDFDWHJRU\SURWRW\SHLHWKHPDJQHW7KDWLVWRVD\DVSHHFKWRNHQUHJDUGOHVVRI
LWVVRXUFHODQJXDJHLVPRUHOLNHO\WREHSHUFHLYHGLQWHUPVRIDQ/FDWHJRU\WKHFORVHULWLV
WRWKHFDWHJRU\SURWRW\SH7KLVSDWWHUQUHODWHVEDFNWRWKHQRWLRQRISHUFHSWXDOZDUSLQJZLWK
L1 experience and the development of prototypes, the acoustic perceptual space becomes
³ZDUSHG´ZLWKWKHUHVXOWWKDWDJLYHQSKRQHWLFGLVWDQFHLVSHUFHLYHGDVVPDOOHUZKHQFORVH
to a prototype than when far from a prototype. The reason for this phenomenon is the nature
RI D SURWRW\SH¶V ³JUDYLWDWLRQDO SXOO´ ZKLFK GLPLQLVKHV LQ VWUHQJWKDV RQH PRYHV IXUWKHU
away from the prototype.
Applied to L2 speech perception, the perceptual warping involved in L1 development
SURYLGHVDFRQYHUJLQJ\HWVOLJKWO\GLIIHUHQWDFFRXQWIRUPDQ\RIWKHVDPH¿QGLQJVDV3$0
/ VXFK DV WKH ORZHU GLVFULPLQDELOLW\ RI 6& FRQWUDVWV FRPSDUHG WR &* FRQWUDVWV UHFDOO
IURPSUHYLRXVGLVFXVVLRQWKH=XOXFRQWUDVWVNhN¶DQGEܦUHVSHFWLYHO\6&DQG&*IRU
/(QJOLVKOLVWHQHUV,QWKHFDVHRIDQ6&FRQWUDVWDQGD&*FRQWUDVWZKRVHPHPEHUVDUH
HTXDOO\IDUDSDUWSKRQHWLFDOO\WKH6&FRQWUDVWE\YLUWXHRIWKHIDFWWKDWERWKPHPEHUVDUH
E\GH¿QLWLRQYHU\FORVHWRWKH/FDWHJRU\WRZKLFKWKH\DUHDVVLPLODWHGZLOOQHFHVVDULO\
EHFORVHURYHUDOOWRWKH/FDWHJRU\SURWRW\SHWKDQWKH&*FRQWUDVW7KHUHIRUHWKHSKRQHWLF
GLVWDQFHUHSUHVHQWHGLQWKH6&FRQWUDVWZLOOEHKDUGHUWRSHUFHLYHWKDQWKHHTXDOSKRQHWLF
GLVWDQFHUHSUHVHQWHGLQWKH&*FRQWUDVWEHFDXVHWKHIRUPHULVPRUHVWURQJO\SXOOHGLQWRWKH
L1 category.
,QVKRUWWKH1/0HYLHZRI/GHYHORSPHQWLQWHUPVRISURWRW\SHIRUPDWLRQDQGSHU-
ceptual warping formalizes crucial outcomes of L1 experience that have consequences for
L2 perception. In the next section, we review a theory of L2 perception which is similar to
1/0LQWHUPVRIIRUPDOL]LQJRXWFRPHVRI/H[SHULHQFHDQGDGGLWLRQDOO\GUDZVDQH[SOLFLW
OLQNWR/SHUFHSWLRQ
Charles B. Chang
432
The Automatic Selective Perception Model
/LNH 1/0 WKH $XWRPDWLF 6HOHFWLYH 3HUFHSWLRQ $63 0RGHO RI / VSHHFK SHUFHSWLRQ
6WUDQJH XQGHUVWDQGV / ELDVHV LQ / SHUFHSWLRQ DV WKH RXWFRPH RI D SURFHVV RI
perceptual specialization for the L1. According to ASP, perceptual specialization involves
establishing VHOHFWLYH SHUFHSWLRQ URXWLQHV 635V WKDW DOORZ SHUFHSWLRQ WR EH WDUJHWHG
DXWRPDWLFDQGUREXVWLQDGYHUVH FRQGLWLRQV&RQVLVWHQWZLWKWKH1/0YLHZRI SHUFHSWXDO
specialization for the L1 as a central component of L1 perceptual ability, ASP views the
GHYHORSPHQWRI/DSSURSULDWH635VDVFULWLFDOWREHFRPLQJDVNLOOHG/OLVWHQHU+RZHYHU
these L1 SPRs also lead to L1 interference in perception of an L2, because the L2 will often
require learners to attend to different properties of the speech signal than the ones relevant
in their L1, and/or to integrate these cues differently.
&UXFLDOO\LQ$63FRQVLVWHQWZLWKWKH6/0DQGWKHRULHVRI/SKRQRORJLFDOGHYHORSPHQW
VXFKDVWKH3URFHVVLQJ5LFK,QIRUPDWLRQIURP0XOWLGLPHQVLRQDO,QWHUDFWLYH5HSUHVHQWDWLRQV
IUDPHZRUN:HUNHUDQG&XUWLQWKHXQVSHFLDOL]HGLHODQJXDJHJHQHUDOSURFHVVLQJ
DELOLWLHVHYLGHQWLQFKLOGKRRGUHPDLQDYDLODEOHWKURXJKRXWOLIHDQGWKHUHIRUHLQDGXOWKRRG
DVZHOO+RZHYHUZKHQWKHFRJQLWLYHGHPDQGVRI D ODQJXDJH WDVNDUHKLJKHJLQSUR-
FHVVLQJDV\QWDFWLFDOO\FRPSOH[/XWWHUDQFH/OHDUQHUV¶DFFHVVWRWKHVHDELOLWLHVPD\EH
EORFNHGUHVXOWLQJLQDGHIDXOWWRDXWRPDWL]HG/635V7KXVWKHHIIHFWRIWDVNGHPDQGVRQ
processing L2 speech is a core consideration of ASP, which distinguishes this theory from
1/0
$QRWKHU DVSHFW RI $63 WKDW GLVWLQJXLVKHV LW IURP 1/0 LV WKH H[SOLFLW OLQN LW GUDZV
EHWZHHQVWDJH RI /DFTXLVLWLRQ DQG PDQQHURI / SHUFHSWXDOSURFHVVLQJ$63LGHQWL¿HV
/ H[SHULHQFH DV D IDFWRU LQÀXHQFLQJ / SHUFHSWLRQ FRQVLVWHQW ZLWK VWXGLHV VXJJHVWLQJ
WKDWDGYDQFHG/OHDUQHUVWHQGWRSHUFHLYHWKH/VLJQL¿FDQWO\GLIIHUHQWO\IURPQRYLFH/
OHDUQHUV±QDPHO\LQDPRUH³SKRQRORJL]HG´PDQQHU7KLVSURFHVVRISKRQRORJL]DWLRQZDV
DSSDUHQW IRU H[DPSOH LQ /HY\ DQG 6WUDQJH¶V VWXG\ RI H[SHULHQFHG DQG LQH[SHUL-
HQFHG/OLVWHQHUVRI)UHQFKERWKIURPDQ/(QJOLVKEDFNJURXQG7KHVH/OLVWHQHUVZHUH
tested on discrimination of several French vowel contrasts, including front rounded vowels
WKDWGRQRWRFFXULQ (QJOLVK \ ° DQGYRZHOVRFFXUULQJLQERWKELODELDO DQG DOYHRODU
contexts. Results showed two systematic disparities between the experienced and inexpe-
rienced groups. First, with the exception of /u/-/y/, the experienced listeners outperformed
the inexperienced listeners overall on most of the vowel contrasts. Second, there was a
VLJQL¿FDQWFRQWH[WHIIHFWIRULQH[SHULHQFHGOLVWHQHUVEXWQRWIRUH[SHULHQFHGOLVWHQHUVLQH[-
perienced listeners performed differently on certain vowel contrasts across coarticulatory
FRQWH[WVHJKLJKHUHUURUUDWHRQX\LQDQDOYHRODUFRQWH[WWKDQLQDELODELDOFRQWH[W
7KHVH¿QGLQJV DUH FRQVLVWHQWZLWK WKH YLHZWKDW / VSHHFKOHDUQLQJ LQYROYHV GHYHORSLQJ
GLVWLQFWUHSUHVHQWDWLRQVIRUQHZ/VRXQGVHJ\DQG°IRU/(QJOLVKVSHDNHUVDVZHOO
as familiarity with rule-governed coarticulatory patterns in the L2, which allows learners
to abstract over phonemically non-contrastive coarticulatory variation, such as the vowel
fronting effect associated with alveolars.
)LQGLQJVLQVWXGLHVVXFKDV/HY\DQG6WUDQJHFRQYHUJHZLWKWKHUHVXOWVRIPDQ\
RWKHUVWXGLHVHJ%UDGORZ3LVRQL$NDKDQH<DPDGDDQG7RKNXUD:DQJ6SHQFH
-RQJPDQDQG6HUHQR$R\DPD)OHJH*XLRQ$NDKDQH<DPDGDDQG<DPDGD
7DMLPD.DWR5RWKZHOO$NDKDQH<DPDGDDQG0XQKDOOLQVXJJHVWLQJWKDW/H[SH-
ULHQFHJHQHUDOO\KHOSVWKH/OHDUQHUWREHFRPHPRUHVNLOOHGDWSHUFHLYLQJWKH/WKRXJK
VHH+ROOLGD\IRUDQLQWHUHVWLQJFRXQWHUH[DPSOHIURP/0DQGDULQOHDUQHUVRI.RUHDQ
This positive correlation between L2 experience and L2 perceptual performance can be
Second language learning and bilingualism
433
DWWULEXWHGWRWZREHQH¿FLDODQGUHODWHGRXWFRPHVRI/VSHHFKOHDUQLQJDGHYHORSPHQW
of mental representations for the contrastive sounds of the L2, particularly those which do
QRWRFFXULQWKH/DQGEGHYHORSPHQWRI635VIRUWKH/%RWKRIWKHVHGHYHORSPHQWV
DOORZ/SHUFHSWLRQWR EH PRUH WDUJHWHG DXWRPDWLF DQGUREXVWUHVXOWLQJLQDVLJQL¿FDQW
advantage for experienced L2 listeners compared to naive or inexperienced listeners.
Thus, ASP accounts for L1 biases in L2 perception, as well as for L2 perceptual learning
over time, in terms of the same fundamental construct: SPRs, which direct a listener’s atten-
tion to a proper subset of the numerous acoustic properties that a listener could potentially
DWWHQGWRLQ WKH VSHHFK VLJQDO$63GLIIHUVIURP3$0/DQG1/0 LQ IRFXVLQJ PRUHRQ
cue weighting than on cross-linguistic mapping or category prototypes; this focus helps to
account for perceptual variation observed among L2 learners with similar L1 phonological
FRQVWUDLQWVVHHHJ&KDQJ+RZHYHUDOOWKUHHRIWKHVHWKHRULHVDUHVLPLODULQWKDW
they are theories of L2 perception, not theories of L2 production. Next, we discuss a theory
of L2 speech that addresses aspects of both perception and production.
The Speech Learning Model
8QOLNHWKHWKHRULHVGLVFXVVHGDERYH )OHJH¶V6SHHFK/HDUQLQJ 0RGHO
6/0LVDWKHRU\RIERWK/SHUFHSWLRQDQG/SURGXFWLRQ,WVDFFRXQWRI/VSHHFKFRQ-
VLVWVRI VL[ PDLQWHQHWV WKH ¿UVWWKUHH EHLQJ WKDWD ODQJXDJH OHDUQHUV PDLQWDLQFRQWLQX-
RXV DFFHVV WR WKH VDPH EDVLF OHDUQLQJ PHFKDQLVPV RYHU WKH OLIHVSDQ LH DGXOW OHDUQHUV
DUHQRW IXQGDPHQWDOO\GLIIHUHQWIURPFKLOG OHDUQHUV LQWKLVUHVSHFWE/ DQG/VRXQGV
H[LVWLQ D³FRPPRQSKRQRORJLFDOVSDFH´)OHJH SDQGOHDUQHUV DUHJHQHUDOO\
PRWLYDWHGWRPDLQWDLQFURVVOLQJXLVWLFFRQWUDVW EHWZHHQ WKHP DQG FWKHUHLVDWHQGHQF\
for HTXLYDOHQFH FODVVL¿FDWLRQ of L2 sounds with close L1 counterparts. This mechanism
RIHTXLYDOHQFHFODVVL¿FDWLRQLVQRWVSHFL¿FWR / OHDUQLQJ EXW UDWKHU LV XVHG LQ WKH / WR
abstract appropriately over phonetic variability in L1 speech. The inappropriate operation
RIHTXLYDOHQFHFODVVL¿FDWLRQLQ/VSHHFKOHDUQLQJKRZHYHUPD\UHVXOWLQSUREOHPVZLWK
perception and/or production of target L2 sounds.
$IRXUWKDQGFHQWUDO FODLPRIWKH6/0LVWKDW /VRXQGVDUHGLIIHUHQWLDOO\GLI¿FXOWWR
OHDUQGHSHQGLQJRQWKHLUSKRQHWLFSUR[LPLW\WR/VRXQGVVHHFigure 15.1,QSDUWLFXODU
WKH6/0SRVLWVWKUHHW\SHVRI/VRXQGV±identical, new, and similar±ZKLFKIRUPDKLHUDU-
FK\RIOHDUQLQJGLI¿FXOW\DVIROORZVIURPOHDVWWRPRVWGLI¿FXOWLGHQWLFDOQHZVLPLODU
,GHQWLFDOVRXQGVDUHWKHOHDVWGLI¿FXOWWROHDUQEHFDXVHLQDOOUHOHYDQWDVSHFWVWKH\DUHH[DFWO\
the same as their closest L1 sound; therefore, straight transfer of the L1 sound to the L2 will
result in high accuracy with the L2 sound immediately. New sounds, by contrast, are more
GLI¿FXOWWROHDUQEHFDXVHDOWKRXJKWKH\UHVLVWHTXLYDOHQFHFODVVL¿FDWLRQZLWK/VRXQGVGXH
to a high degree of disparity along one or more dimensions, this cross-linguistic disparity
DOVRUHTXLUHVVRPHQRYHODVSHFWVRIWKH/VRXQGWREHOHDUQHGWR DSSUR[LPDWHWDUJHWOLNH
performance. These novel aspects, however, are hypothesized to be learnable in the long
WHUP2QWKHRWKHUKDQGVLPLODUVRXQGVDUHWKHPRVWGLI¿FXOWWROHDUQEHFDXVHWKH\DUHFORVH
HQRXJKWR/VRXQGVWRXQGHUJRHTXLYDOHQFHFODVVL¿FDWLRQZLWKWKHP\HWIDUHQRXJKIURP
/VRXQGVWKDWVLPSOHWUDQVIHURIWKH/VRXQGVLVQRWVXI¿FLHQWIRUWDUJHWOLNHSHUIRUPDQFH
In other words, similar sounds exist in an intermediate space of cross-linguistic similarity
DVVKRZQLQFigure 15.1ZKLFKLQWURGXFHVWKHSRVVLELOLW\RILQDSSURSULDWHLQÀXHQFHIURP
properties of close L1 sounds.
7KHQDWXUHRI/LQÀXHQFHIRUWKHWKUHHW\SHVRI/VRXQGVLVFDSWXUHGLQWKH¿IWKWHQHW
RIWKH6/0/VRXQGVPD\HLWKHUDSSUR[LPDWHLHDVVLPLODWHSURSHUWLHVRIRUGLVVLPLODWH
Charles B. Chang
434
IURP/VRXQGV,QSDUWLFXODUZKHQDQ/VRXQGXQGHUJRHVHTXLYDOHQFHFODVVL¿FDWLRQZLWK
DFORVH / VRXQGDV LQWKH FDVH RILGHQWLFDO DQG VLPLODUVRXQGV WKH / DQG /VRXQGV
EHFRPH³GLDSKRQHV´VRXQGVWKDWDUHSHUFHSWXDOO\OLQNHG in the mind of the L2 learner. In
WKHFDVHRIDVLPLODU/VRXQGWKLVSHUFHSWXDOOLQNDJHLHSDUWLDORUWRWDOFRUHSUHVHQWDWLRQ
RIWKH/VRXQGZLWKWKH/VRXQGHYHQWXDOO\OHDGVWRWKH/DQG/VRXQGVDSSUR[LPDWLQJ
HDFKRWKHULQSURGXFWLRQHJ:LOOLDPV0DMRU2QWKHRWKHUKDQGZKHQDQ/
VRXQGDYRLGVHTXLYDOHQFHFODVVL¿FDWLRQZLWK/VRXQGVDVLQWKHFDVHRIQHZVRXQGVWKH
L2 sound is represented distinctly from L1 sounds. This distinct representation allows the
/VRXQGWREHSURGXFHGHYHQWXDOO\LQDWDUJHWOLNHPDQQHUHJ:LOOLDPV$QWRQLRX
%HVW 7\OHU DQG .URRV $OWHUQDWLYHO\ KRZHYHU / VRXQGV UHSUHVHQWHG GLVWLQFWO\
from the closest L1 categories may dissimilate from them so as to maximize cross-linguistic
contrast within the shared L1-L2 phonological space; such dissimilation may also result
LQ/VRXQGVGLYHUJLQJIURPQDWLYHPRQROLQJXDOQRUPV)RUH[DPSOHZKHUHDVHDUO\ /
.RUHDQ/(QJOLVKELOLQJXDOVZHUHIRXQGWRSURGXFHQDWLYHOLNHYRLFHRQVHWWLPH927LQ
WKHLU/YRLFHOHVVVWRSV.DQJDQG*XLRQDQHDUO\/)UHQFK/(QJOLVKELOLQJXDO
SURGXFHG/927VWKDWZHUHORQJHUWKDQQDWLYHLHSDVWWKH(QJOLVKPRQROLQJXDOQRUP
LQDQDSSDUHQWDWWHPSWWRGLIIHUHQWLDWHWKH/VWRSVIURPWKH/VWRSV0DFN
Although assimilation and dissimilation result in opposite directions of movement rela-
tive to an L1 sound, crucially they may affect sounds of both the L1 and the L2, in line with
WKHVL[WKWHQHW RI WKH 6/0FURVVOLQJXLVWLFLQÀXHQFH&/, LV LQ SULQFLSOHELGLUHFWLRQDO
7KXV&/,LVQRWOLPLWHGWR/VRXQGVLQÀXHQFLQJ/VRXQGVLH³IRUZDUGWUDQVIHU´EXW
PD\DOVRUHVXOWLQ/VRXQGVLQÀXHQFLQJ/VRXQGVLH³EDFNZDUGWUDQVIHU´%LGLUHFWLRQ-
DOLW\RI&/,DWWKHSKRQHWLFOHYHOZDVVKRZQLQDVHPLQDOVWXG\RI(QJOLVK)UHQFKELOLQJXDOV
/(QJOLVKODWH OHDUQHUV RI)UHQFKDQG / )UHQFKODWHOHDUQHUV RI (QJOLVK)OHJH
This study focused on two acoustic properties of learners’ speech in both the L1 and the
/WKH927RIWFDQRQLFDOO\VKRUWODJLQ)UHQFKEXWORQJODJLQ(QJOLVKDQGWKHVHFRQG
IRUPDQWF2IUHTXHQF\RIXFDQRQLFDOO\ORZLQ)UHQFKEXWKLJKLQ(QJOLVKDVZHOODV\
a vowel phoneme that occurs only in French. Results provided evidence for bidirectional
&/,2QWKHRQHKDQGPDQ\EXWQRWDOO/(QJOLVKOHDUQHUVRI)UHQFKSURGXFHG)UHQFKW
ZLWKWRRORQJ927VLHDV(QJOLVKLQÀXHQFHGDQG(QJOLVKWZLWKWRRVKRUW927VLH
DV)UHQFKLQÀXHQFHGDVLPLODUSDWWHUQZDVIRXQGZLWKWKH927VRI/)UHQFKOHDUQHUVRI
English. As for F2, both L1 English learners of French and L1 French learners of English
produced French /u/ with too-high F2YDOXHVLHDV(QJOLVKLQÀXHQFHGDOWKRXJKRQO\WKH
L1 French learners of English also produced English /u/ with too-low F2 values. Notably,
WKH/(QJOLVKOHDUQHUVDGGLWLRQDOO\PDQDJHGWRSURGXFHWKH)UHQFK\ZLWKQDWLYHOLNHF2
YDOXHV7KXVRYHUDOOWKHSDWWHUQRIUHVXOWVLQWKLVVWXG\ZDVFRQVLVWHQWZLWKWKH6/0LQWZR
PDLQUHVSHFWVDVKRZLQJDGLVSDULW\EHWZHHQ³VLPLODU´VRXQGVHJ(QJOLVKDQG)UHQFK
WZKLFKHYLQFH&/,GXHWRHTXLYDOHQFHFODVVL¿FDWLRQDQG³QHZ´VRXQGVHJ)UHQFK\
IRU/(QJOLVKOHDUQHUVZKLFKDYRLG&/,DQGEVKRZLQJELGLUHFWLRQDO&/,
Figure 15.1 Continuum of similarity of L2 sounds to L1 sounds. NEW sounds are the least
similar to L1 sounds; IDENTICAL sounds, the most similar; and SIMILAR sounds, intermediate
in similarity.
Second language learning and bilingualism
435
7ZRDVSHFWVRIWKH6/0WKDWGLVWLQJXLVKLWIURPRWKHULQÀXHQWLDOWKHRUHWLFDOIUDPHZRUNV
IRU / VSHHFK UHVHDUFK DUH LWV H[SOLFLW DSSOLFDWLRQ WR SURGXFWLRQ DV RSSRVHG WR D IRFXV
RQSHUFHSWLRQ DQG LWVSUHGLFWLRQ RI ELGLUHFWLRQDO &/, DVRSSRVHG WR XQLGLUHFWLRQDO&/,
VSHFL¿FDOO\ / LQÀXHQFH RQ WKH / 7KHVH DVSHFWV RI WKH IUDPHZRUN PDNH LW HVSHFLDOO\
DSSURSULDWHIRUVWXGLHVRI/SURGXFWLRQDVLQ)OHJHDQGVWXGLHVRI/FKDQJHLQ/
OHDUQHUVERWKLQSURGXFWLRQHJ0DMRU&KDQJEGH/HHXZ
6FKPLGDQG0HQQHQ'PLWULHYD-RQJPDQDQG6HUHQRDQGSHUFHSWLRQHJ
7LFHDQG:RRGOH\$KQ&KDQJ'H.H\VHUDQG/HH(OOLV
Summary and synthesis
,QVKRUWZKLOHWKHWKHRULHVGLVFXVVHGDWWKHEHJLQQLQJRIWKLVFKDSWHURIWHQPDNHFRQYHUJHQW
predictions in regard to L2 phonetic development, they differ in a number of ways. The
SULPDU\GLPHQVLRQVRI GLIIHUHQFHDPRQJWKHVHWKHRUHWLFDOIUDPHZRUNVDUH VXPPDUL]HG LQ
Table 15.2 LQFOXGLQJ WKH / H[SHULHQFH RU SUR¿FLHQF\ OHYHO RI WKH OHDUQHU GHVFULEHG E\
WKHWKHRU\WKHEDVLFXQLWRIDQDO\VLVWKH/GRPDLQVFRYHUHGDQGWKHIRXQGDWLRQRIWKH
WKHRU\¶VH[SODQDWLRQRI&/,LQHLWKHUGLUHFWLRQ/WR//WR/
$VGLVFXVVHGDERYH&/,DWWKHSKRQHWLFOHYHOKDVEHHQRIVSHFLDOFRQFHUQLQWKHVWXG\RI
/VSHHFKDQGELOLQJXDOLVPVSDZQLQJDZHDOWKRI ¿QGLQJVRQ//SKRQHWLFLQWHUDFWLRQ
LQ/OHDUQHUVRIYDULRXVEDFNJURXQGVIRUIXUWKHUUHYLHZVVHH0DFNDQG.DUWXVKLQD
)UDXHQIHOGHUDQG*ROHVWDQL$SDUWIURPVKRZLQJ/LQÀXHQFHLQWKHLU/SURGXFWLRQ
HJ3RUWDQG0LWOHE*DVVOHDUQHUVPD\SURGXFHQHLWKHUWKH/QRUWKH/
DVQDWLYHOLNH)OHJHDQG(HIWLQJEWKH\PD\DOVR VKRZOLWWOHWRQRSKRQHWLFGLIIHU-
HQWLDWLRQEHWZHHQWKHWZRODQJXDJHVHJ:LOOLDPV0DMRUOHDGLQJWR³FRP-
SURPLVH´YDOXHVEHWZHHQ/DQG/QRUPVHJ)OHJH2QWKHRWKHUKDQGOHDUQHUV¶
SURGXFWLRQRIWKH/DVZHOODVRIWKH/PD\DOVREHQDWLYHOLNHHJ)RNHV%RQGDQG
6WHLQEHUJ0DFNDQGHVSHFLDOO\IRU HDUO\ELOLQJXDOVFORVHDSSUR[LPDWLRQRI
PRQROLQJXDOQRUPVIRUERWKODQJXDJHVLVFOHDUO\SRVVLEOHHJ&DUDPD]]D<HQL.RPVKLDQ
=XULI DQG &DUERQH :LOOLDPV )OHJH DQG (HIWLQJ D .DQJ DQG *XLRQ
$QWRQLRXHWDO$OORIWKHWKHRULHVGLVFXVVHGLQWKLVFKDSWHUDGGUHVV&/,LQWKH
7DEOH &RPSDULVRQRIVHOHFWHGIUDPHZRUNVIRU/VSHHFKUHVHDUFK3$0/3HUFHSWXDO$VVLPL-
ODWLRQ0RGHO/6/06SHHFK/HDUQLQJ0RGHO1/01DWLYH/DQJXDJH0DJQHW7KHRU\$63$XWR-
PDWLF6HOHFWLYH3HUFHSWLRQ0RGHO&/,FURVVOLQJXLVWLFLQÀXHQFH1$QRWDSSOLFDEOH
3$0/ 1/0 ASP SLM
Learner level novice to
advanced
advanced novice to
advanced
advanced
Basic unit articulatory
gesture
phonological
category
auditory cue SRVLWLRQVSHFL¿F
allophone
$ERXWSHUFHSWLRQ" yes yes yes yes
$ERXWSURGXFWLRQ" no no no yes
$FFRXQWRI/ĺ
/&/,"
perceptual
assimilation
perceptual
warping
perceptual
attunement
L1-L2
diaphones
$FFRXQWRI/ĸ
/&/,"
NA NA NA L1-L2
diaphones
Charles B. Chang
436
/WR/GLUHFWLRQEXWQRWQHFHVVDULO\LQWKH/WR/GLUHFWLRQ,QWKLVUHJDUGWKH6/0LV
XQLTXHLQSURYLGLQJDQDFFRXQWRIELGLUHFWLRQDO&/,
To close this section, it is worth noting that the diversity of L1 and L2 outcomes in L2
learners has been approached analytically in additional ways, including systems typology
DQG FRPSXWDWLRQDO PRGHOLQJ ,Q UHJDUG WR W\SRORJ\ /DHXIHU SUHVHQWV DQ DWWHPSW
to schematize the different possible bilingual phonological systems, which each lead to a
VSHFL¿FSDWWHUQRI/DQG/VSHHFKSURGXFWLRQ&RPELQLQJDVSHFWVRIWKH ELOLQJXDOOH[L-
FDOFRQFHSWXDOPRGHORI:HLQUHLFK ZLWK WKHWULSDUWLWHVSHHFKSURGXFWLRQ PRGHO RI
.HDWLQJ/DHXIHUGLVWLQJXLVKHVDPRQJWKUHHW\SHVRIELOLQJXDOSKRQRORJLFDOV\VWHP
FRH[LVWHQW PHUJHG DQG VXSHUVXERUGLQDWH LQ WHUPV RI WKH FRQÀDWLRQ RI WKH / DQG /
DWYDULRXVOHYHOV RI UHSUHVHQWDWLRQIRUIXUWKHU GLVFXVVLRQ VHH&KDQJD SS ±
,Q UHJDUG WR PRGHOLQJ 7RELQ 1DP DQG )RZOHU SURYLGH DQ H[DPSOH RI D IRUPDO
computational account of shifts in bilingual speech through variation in the ambient lan-
JXDJHHQYLURQPHQW7KLVFRPSXWDWLRQDODFFRXQWDVVXPHVDG\QDPLFDOV\VWHPVIUDPHZRUN
LQFUHDVLQJO\FRPPRQLQUHVHDUFKRQODQJXDJH GHYHORSPHQWDQGFKDQJHVHHHJGH%RW
/RZLHDQG9HUVSRRUGH/HHXZ0HQQHQDQG6FREELHDQGLVDOVRFRQVLVWHQW
with exemplar approaches to phonology and L2 acquisition incorporating a role for episodic
PHPRU\-RKQVRQ3LHUUHKXPEHUW+D]DQ
The role of L1-L2 similarity
Although the theories of L2 speech discussed in this chapter differ in a number of ways,
ZKDWWKH\KDYHLQFRPPRQLVWKHDFNQRZOHGJPHQWDQGLQFRUSRUDWLRQRIDUROHIRUWKH/LQ
L2 development. Whether described as perceptual assimilation to the L1, equivalence clas-
VL¿FDWLRQZLWKWKH/RUVLPSO\WUDQVIHURIDQ/FDWHJRU\VSDFHRU/VHOHFWLYHSHUFHSWLRQ
URXWLQHVDVSHFWVRIWKH/DUHWDNHQWRH[HUWDSRZHUIXOLQÀXHQFHRQ/VSHHFK7KH6/0
DQG3$0/LQSDUWLFXODUDUHEDVHGRQFURVVOLQJXLVWLFPDSSLQJRI/VRXQGVWR/VRXQGV
which raises the question of how L2 learners identify the L1 correspondents of L2 sounds.
In other words, assuming that the main criterion for establishing L1-L2 correspondence is
OLQJXLVWLFVLPLODULW\KRZGR/OHDUQHUVPDNHMXGJPHQWVRIVLPLODULW\EHWZHHQ/DQG/
VRXQGV"
At the heart of this question is a crucial feature of L2 learners that distinguishes them
IURPQDLYHOLVWHQHUVDEVWUDFWNQRZOHGJHRIWKHWDUJHWODQJXDJH$VDFNQRZOHGJHGLQ3$0
/XQOLNHQDLYHOLVWHQHUVZKRE\GH¿QLWLRQDUHQRWIDPLOLDUZLWKWKH//OHDUQHUVPD\
KDYHDFRQVLGHUDEOHDPRXQWRIKLJKHUOHYHONQRZOHGJHRIWKH/LQFOXGLQJNQRZOHGJHRI
the phonemic inventory, phonotactic constraints, allophonic alternations, and/or the ortho-
JUDSKLFV\VWHPXVHGWRYLVXDOO\UHSUHVHQWWKHVRXQGVRIWKHODQJXDJHFI3ROND
%HVWDQG7\OHU%RRPHUVKLQH+DOO+XPHDQG-RKQVRQ'DYLGVRQ&RQ-
sequently, there are several sources of information about L2 sounds that L2 learners may
WDNHLQWRDFFRXQWLQIRUPLQJDMXGJPHQWRI//VLPLODULW\WKDWJREH\RQGWKHUDZSKRQHWLF
GDWDDYDLODEOHWRERWK/OHDUQHUVDQGQDLYHOLVWHQHUVZKLFKLVJHQHUDOO\WDNHQWREHJHVWXUDO
LQ3$0/DQGDFRXVWLFLQWKH6/0
For L2 learners, the availability of multiple sources of information about L2 sounds
LQWURGXFHV WKH SRVVLELOLW\ RI FRQÀLFW EHWZHHQ WKRVH VRXUFHV &KDQJ 7R WDNH RQH
H[DPSOHSRLQWHGRXWE\&KDQJ<DR+D\QHVDQG5KRGHVZKLFKSDUDOOHOVWKHVLWXD-
WLRQLQ)OHJHKLJKURXQGHGYRZHOVLQ0DQGDULQ&KLQHVHLH\DQGXUHVHPEOH
$PHULFDQ(QJOLVKYRZHOVDWWZROHYHOVD DQ DFRXVWLF OHYHO HJ F2 frequency, formant
WUDMHFWRULHVDQGEDSKRQHPLFOHYHOHJEHLQJDKLJKEDFNURXQGHGYRZHOX,QWHUPV
Second language learning and bilingualism
437
of acoustic proximity in F1îF2VSDFH0DQGDULQ\LVFORVHUWR(QJOLVKXWKDQLV0DQGDULQ
XGXHWRWKHIDFWWKDW$PHULFDQ(QJOLVKXWHQGVWREHUHODWLYHO\IURQWDQGLQFHUWDLQ
GLDOHFWVVXFKDV6RXWKHUQ&DOLIRUQLDQ(QJOLVKSKRQHWLFDOO\XQURXQGHGDVZHOO+DJLZDUD
/DGHIRJHG2+RZHYHULQWHUPVRISKRQHPLFFRUUHVSRQGHQFH0DQGDULQXLV
WKHFORVHUPDWFKWR(QJOLVKXEHFDXVH0DQGDULQXDQGQRW\LVDKLJKEDFNURXQGHG
YRZHOOLNH(QJOLVKXWKLVLVUHÀHFWHGIRUH[DPSOHLQVLPLODUSKRQRWDFWLFSDWWHUQLQJLQWKH
WZRODQJXDJHVHJQRQRFFXUUHQFHRIRQVHW&ZX
7KXVLQWKH FDVH RI / (QJOLVKOHDUQHUVRI 0DQGDULQ SURGXFWLRQ RI WKH/0DQGDULQ
YRZHOV\ DQGXFRXOGEHLQÀXHQFHGE\WKHSURSHUWLHVRI(QJOLVKXLQDWOHDVW WZRGLI-
IHUHQWZD\VGHSHQGLQJRQZKHWKHUDFRXVWLFRUSKRQHPLFFRQVLGHUDWLRQVWDNHSUHFHGHQFHLQ
FURVVOLQJXLVWLFPDSSLQJ)LUVW0DQGDULQ\FRXOGEHPDSSHGWR(QJOLVKXZLWK0DQGD-
ULQXDYRLGLQJHTXLYDOHQFHFODVVL¿FDWLRQZLWKDQ(QJOLVKYRZHOWKLVZRXOGOHDGWRWRRORZ
F2YDOXHVIRU0DQGDULQ\DV(QJOLVKXLVFKDUDFWHUL]HGE\DORZHUF2WKDQ0DQGDULQ\
DQGWDUJHWOLNHSURGXFWLRQRI0DQGDULQXD ³QHZ´ VRXQG LQ 6/0WHUPV$OWHUQDWLYHO\
0DQGDULQXFRXOGEHPDSSHGWR(QJOLVKXZLWK0DQGDULQ\DYRLGLQJHTXLYDOHQFHFODV-
VL¿FDWLRQZLWKDQ(QJOLVKYRZHOWKLVZRXOGOHDGWRWRRKLJKF2YDOXHVIRU0DQGDULQXDV
English /u/ is characterized by a higher F2WKDQ0DQGDULQXDQGDWDUJHWOLNHSURGXFWLRQ
RI0DQGDULQ\:KDW&KDQJHWDOIRXQGZDVWKHODWWHUUHODWLYHO\H[SHULHQFHG/
(QJOLVKOHDUQHUVRI0DQGDULQSURGXFHG0DQGDULQXZLWKF2 values that were higher than
WKRVHRI/0DQGDULQVSHDNHUVEXW0DQGDULQ\ZLWKF2YDOXHVQRWVLJQL¿FDQWO\GLIIHUHQW
IURPWKRVHRI / 0DQGDULQ VSHDNHUVUHSOLFDWLQJWKHSDWWHUQ UHSRUWHG LQ )OHJHIRU
advanced L1 English learners of French.
7RJHWKHUZLWKDUDQJHRIRWKHUUHVXOWVIURP/SHUFHSWLRQ3RONDDQG%RKQ6WUDQJH
/HY\DQG/HKQKROI ORDQZRUG DGDSWDWLRQ .DQJ&KDQJD DQG
SKRQHWLF GULIW &KDQJ E ¿QGLQJV VXFK DV LQ )OHJH DQG &KDQJ HW DO
FRQWULEXWHWRDSLFWXUHLQZKLFKFURVVOLQJXLVWLFPDSSLQJLHUHODWLQJDQ/VRXQG
WRDQ/VRXQGRIWHQIROORZVWKHSKRQHPLFURXWHRYHUWKHDFRXVWLFURXWH7RWDNHRQHRWKHU
example from loanword adaptation, high lax vowels in English loanwords are adapted by
French-English bilinguals not with the acoustically closest mid vowels of French, but with
WKHSKRQHPLFDOO\SDUDOOHODQGDFRXVWLFDOO\PRUHGLVWDQWKLJKYRZHOVRI)UHQFK/D&KDULWp
DQG3DUDGLV7KHIDFWWKDWWKLVKDSSHQVZLWKERWKRIWKH(QJOLVKYRZHOVDWLVVXHܼ
DQGݜQRWMXVWZLWKRQHRUWKHRWKHUVXJJHVWVWKDWFURVVOLQJXLVWLFPDSSLQJRQDSKRQHPLF
basis is systematic rather than idiosyncratic. Thus, at least for advanced L2 learners, there
PD\EHDSULYLOHJHGVWDWXVRIDEVWUDFWKLJKHUOHYHOLQIRUPDWLRQDERXW/DQG/VRXQGVLQ
PDNLQJMXGJPHQWVRIFURVVOLQJXLVWLFVLPLODULW\+RZHYHUWKHVSHFL¿FG\QDPLFVRILQWHUDF-
tion between phonetic and phonological types of cross-linguistic similarity, the manner in
ZKLFKWKHVHG\QDPLFVPD\FKDQJHRYHU WKH FRXUVH RI / OHDUQLQJ DQG WKH LQÀXHQFH RID
FKDQJLQJFRQVWUXFWRISHUFHLYHGGLVVLPLODULW\LQVKDSLQJ/RXWFRPHVFI$R\DPDHWDO
UHPDLQRSHQTXHVWLRQV
Linking L2 perception and L2 production
$OWKRXJKWKHRULHV RI/ VSHHFKVXFK DVWKH 6/0 DUH RIWHQ FRQFHUQHG ZLWK IXQGDPHQWDO
similarities between child and adult learners, there are some important differences between
L1 learning and L2 learning of a target language, and one area in which such differences are
REVHUYHGLVWKHOLQNEHWZHHQSHUFHSWLRQ DQGSURGXFWLRQ$FFRUGLQJWR1/0HSHUFHSWLRQ
DQGSURGXFWLRQDUHFORVHO\OLQNHGLQ/DFTXLVLWLRQDQGWKHVHOLQNVDUHXQGHUVWRRGWRIRUP
during L1 acquisition, due in part to the articulatory-auditory loop associated with an infant
Charles B. Chang
438
hearing the consequences of her own vocalizations. Further, the timing of perception and
production milestones in L1 development, which typically shows children reliably perceiv-
ing speech sounds well before they can produce them, suggests that perception generally
SUHFHGHVSURGXFWLRQ ZKHQLWFRPHVWRWKH/DOWKRXJKJLYHQWKH DIRUHPHQWLRQHGUROHRI
production in perceptual development, this should be regarded as a gross view of percep-
WLRQSURGXFWLRQRUGHULQJLQ/GHYHORSPHQW
In L2 speech learning, the relationship between perception and production is less clear
WKDQLQ/GHYHORSPHQW2QHERG\RI¿QGLQJVWKDWEHDUVRQWKLVLVVXHFRPHVIURPUHVHDUFK
RQSKRQHWLF WUDLQLQJ±LQSDUWLFXODUWUDQVIHURIWUDLQLQJJDLQV IURPWKHWUDLQHGPRGDOLW\
to the untrained modality. In brief, although some studies report perception-production
FRUUHODWLRQVDQGRUFDUU\RYHURIWUDLQLQJJDLQVDFURVVPRGDOLWLHVHJ&DWIRUGDQG3LVRQL
/HDWKHU:DQJ-RQJPDQDQG6HUHQR.DUWXVKLQD+HUYDLV$GHOPDQ
)UDXHQIHOGHUDQG*ROHVWDQLPXFKRIWKLVOLWHUDWXUHHYLQFHVOLWWOHWRQRUHODWLRQVKLS
between perception and production for L2 speech. For example, Kartushina and Frauen-
IHOGHUWHVWHGDVDPSOHRI/6SDQLVKOHDUQHUVRI)UHQFKRQWKHLUSHUFHSWLRQDQG
production of French front mid vowel contrasts and found no correlation between learn-
HUV¶SHUIRUPDQFHLQSHUFHSWLRQDQGSURGXFWLRQVHHDOVR3HSHUNDPSDQG%RXFKRQ
2IFRXUVHIDLOXUHWR¿QGDVWDWLVWLFDOO\VLJQL¿FDQWFRUUHODWLRQEHWZHHQWKHWZRPRGDOLWLHV
does not constitute evidence that there is no relationship between them; however, when
FRUUHODWLRQVKDYHEHHQIRXQGDFURVVPRGDOLWLHVWKHHIIHFWVL]HKDVRIWHQEHHQVPDOO%UD-
GORZHW DO$NDKDQH<DPDGD 0F'HUPRWW$GDFKL .DZDKDUDDQG 3UXLWW
)OHJH0DF.D\DQG0HDGRU)XUWKHUPRUH/SURGXFWLRQDFFXUDF\GRHVQRWVHHP
WRGHSHQGRQKLJK/SHUFHSWXDODELOLW\6KHOGRQDQG6WUDQJH7KHVH¿QGLQJVVXJ-
gest that transfer of perceptual learning to production, and vice versa, may be complicated
E\DYDULHW\RILQWHUYHQLQJIDFWRUVIRUUHFHQWUHYLHZVVHH.DUWXVKLQD.DUWXVKLQD
HWDO
The complex relationship between L2 developments in perception and production invites
WKHTXHVWLRQRIZKHWKHU/RXWFRPHVPLJKWJHQHUDOO\EHQH¿WIURPWUDLQLQJLQYROYLQJPRUH
WKDQ RQH PRGDOLW\ VHH &KDSWHU WKLV YROXPH GLVFXVVLQJ PXOWLFKDQQHO WUDLQLQJ RI WKH
/,I/ WUDLQLQJ LQ RQHPRGDOLW\WHQGVWRLPSURYHPDLQO\WKHWUDLQHGPRGDOLW\ DQG QRW
necessarily the untrained modality, could L2 speech development be enhanced or acceler-
DWHGZLWKPXOWLPRGDOWUDLQLQJLQYROYLQJPRUHWKDQRQHVWLPXOXVFKDQQHOHJDXGLWRU\DQG
DUWLFXODWRU\DXGLWRU\DQGYLVXDO"7KHORJLFRI³PRUHLVEHWWHU´ZRXOGSUHGLFW\HVDQGVRPH
¿QGLQJVVKRZDVLJQL¿FDQWEHQH¿WRIYLVXDOIHHGEDFNRQOHDUQHUV¶SURGXFWLRQFRPELQHGZLWK
DXGLWRU\H[SRVXUHWRDQDWLYHPRGHOHJ.DUWXVKLQD+RZHYHUWZRUHFHQWVWXGLHV
suggest that multimodal L2 engagement does not necessarily improve L2 outcomes, and
in certain cases can actually be detrimental to L2 speech development. In one study of L1
(QJOLVKVSHDNHUVEHLQJWUDLQHGRQ0DQGDULQWRQHV*RGIURLG/LQDQG5\XVHYHUDO
types of multimodal perceptual training were systematically compared to each other, includ-
LQJWKUHH³VLQJOHFXH´W\SHVRIWUDLQLQJ LQYROYLQJH[SRVXUHWRRQO\RQHYLVXDOFXHDORQJ-
VLGHDXGLWRU\VWLPXOLQXPEHUSLWFKFRQWRXURUFRORUDQGWZR³GXDOFXH´W\SHVRIWUDLQLQJ
LQYROYLQJ H[SRVXUH WR WZR YLVXDO FXHV FRORU DQG QXPEHU RU FRORU DQG SLWFK FRQWRXU
Although test results showed perceptual gains with all training types, single-cue exposure
WRQXPEHUVRUSLWFKFRQWRXUVZDVPRUHEHQH¿FLDOWKDQVLQJOHFXHH[SRVXUHWRFRORUVZKLOH
QHLWKHUGXDOFXH H[SRVXUHZDVPRUHEHQH¿FLDOWKDQ VLQJOHFXHH[SRVXUH,QDQRWKHU VWXG\
RI/6SDQLVKOHDUQHUVRI%DVTXH%DHVH%HUNDQG6DPXHOERWKLQH[SHULHQFHGDQG
H[SHULHQFHGOHDUQHUVZHUH WUDLQHG RQ /%DVTXHVRXQGVLQWZRFRQGLWLRQVDSHUFHSWLRQ
RQO\DQGESHUFHSWLRQDQGSURGXFWLRQZKHUHDQRUDOUHSHWLWLRQWDVNZDVLQWHUOHDYHGZLWK
Second language learning and bilingualism
439
DXGLWRU\H[SRVXUHDQGSHUFHSWXDOMXGJPHQWV5HVXOWVVKRZHGDGHWULPHQWDOHIIHFWRISUR-
GXFLQJVSHHFKGXULQJWKHSHUFHSWXDOWUDLQLQJZKLFKZDVPLWLJDWHGEXWQRWHOLPLQDWHGE\
SUHYLRXVH[SHULHQFHZLWKWKH/VHHDOVR/HDFKDQG6DPXHO%DHVH%HUNIRU
VLPLODU¿QGLQJV
:K\ZRXOG PXOWLPRGDO / H[SRVXUH QRWQHFHVVDULO\ IDFLOLWDWH / OHDUQLQJ RXWFRPHV"
7KHUHDUHDWOHDVWWKUHHSRVVLEOHDQGQRWPXWXDOO\H[FOXVLYHH[SODQDWLRQV%DHVH%HUNDQG
6DPXHO DOOXGH WR WKH UROH RI FRJQLWLYH RYHUORDG LQ WKLV W\SH RI PXOWLPRGDO VHW-
WLQJVHHHJYDQ0HUULsQERHUDQG6ZHOOHUZKLOH*RGIURLGHWDODGGLWLRQ-
ally consider the potentially detrimental effect of extraneous processing of redundant or
irrelevant information. Either or both of these factors may be responsible for the observed
LQWHUIHUHQFHDVVRFLDWHGZLWKYDU\LQJWDVNLUUHOHYDQWSKRQHWLFIHDWXUHVLQ/VSHHFKWUDLQLQJ
$QWRQLRXDQG:RQJ*RGIURLGHWDOKRZHYHUDUHFDUHIXOWRSRLQWRXWWKDW
performance in their dual-cue condition was never worse than in the single-cue condition,
which is not entirely consistent with an account of their results in terms of cognitive load
RU H[WUDQHRXV SURFHVVLQJ &RQVHTXHQWO\ WKH\ H[SODLQ WKH ODFN RI EHQH¿W DVVRFLDWHG ZLWK
adding a second cue in terms of an implementation issue: given the way in which color was
LQFRUSRUDWHGLQWRWKH VWLPXOL SDUWLFLSDQWV PD\KDYHSHUFHSWXDOO\EDFNJURXQGHG WKH FRORU
FXHVXFKWKDW³FRORUPLJKW KDYH SOD\HG D PRUHSHULSKHUDOUROHWKDQLQWHQGHG´ *RGIURLG
HWDOS
7KXV WKH ¿QGLQJV RI / VSHHFK UHVHDUFK SUHVHQW D PL[HG SLFWXUH UHJDUGLQJ WKH UHOD-
WLRQVKLSRISHUFHSWLRQDQG SURGXFWLRQ LQ / GHYHORSPHQW2QWKHRQH KDQG VWXGLHV VXFK
DV%UDGORZ HW DO DQG%DHVH%HUN DQG 6DPXHO ZKLFK VKRZIDFLOLWDWLRQ RU
interference across modalities, provide evidence that perception and production processes
must draw on mental representations that are at least partly shared between the two modali-
WLHV2QWKHRWKHUKDQGVWXGLHVVXFKDV .DUWXVKLQDDQG)UDXHQIHOGHUZKLFKIDLOWR
¿QGDFORVHFRUUHODWLRQEHWZHHQSHUFHSWLRQDQGSURGXFWLRQSHUIRUPDQFHLQDQ/VXJJHVW
some degree of dissociation between perception and production representations as well.
The degree to which L2 perception and L2 production processes overlap, the nature of this
overlap, and the manner in which the perception-production relationship differs between L1
and L2 learning remain some of the basic questions in research on L2 speech learning and
phonetic development more generally.
Concluding remarks
7KLVFKDSWHUKDVDWWHPSWHGWRV\QWKHVL]HFRUHLQVLJKWVDQGFODLPVRILQÀXHQWLDOWKHRULHVLQ
WKH ¿HOG RI / VSHHFK OHDUQLQJ 7KH IRXU VHOHFWHG IUDPHZRUNV GLVFXVVHG KHUH 3$0/
1/0$636/0 DUH VRPH RI WKH PRVW GHWDLOHG DQG ZLGHO\ WHVWHG WKHRULHV LQ WKH ¿HOG
+RZHYHU LW VKRXOG EH QRWHG WKDW RWKHU IUDPHZRUNV VXFK DV (FNPDQ¶V 0DUNHGQHVV 'LI-
IHUHQWLDO+\SRWKHVLVDQG 6WUXFWXUDO &RQIRUPLW\+\SRWKHVLV(FNPDQ
%URZQ¶VIHDWXUDOPRGHO RI/SHUFHSWLRQ%URZQ WKH2QWRJHQ\3K\ORJHQ\ 0RGHO
0DMRU WKH 6HFRQG /DQJXDJH /LQJXLVWLF 3HUFHSWLRQ 0RGHO (VFXGHUR YDQ
/HXVVHQDQG(VFXGHURDQGDGGLWLRQDO2SWLPDOLW\7KHRUHWLFDSSURDFKHVFI+DQFLQ
%KDWWDOVRDGGUHVVDVSHFWVRI/VSHHFKOHDUQLQJZLWKGLIIHUHQWHPSKDVHV VXFKDV
WKHUROHRIODQJXDJHXQLYHUVDO IDFWRUV 0DUNHGQHVV 'LIIHUHQWLDO+\SRWKHVLVDQGGHYHORS-
PHQWDO FKDQJHV RYHU WKH FRXUVH RI OHDUQLQJ 2QWRJHQ\ 3K\ORJHQ\ 0RGHO )XUWKHUPRUH
WKHEXUJHRQLQJ¿HOGRI/SURVRG\KDVOHGWRQHZGHYHORSPHQWVDQGWKHRULHVIRFXVLQJRQ
VXSUDVHJPHQWDOIHDWXUHVRIWKH/VXFKDVUK\WKPDQGLQWRQDWLRQHJ/LDQG3RVW
0HQQHQDQGGH/HHXZ0HQQHQ
Charles B. Chang
440
In closing, although the focus of this chapter has been phonetic development in typical
late-onset L2 learners, it is worth drawing the reader’s attention to some related areas of
research activity that, for reasons of space, have not been given extensive discussion here.
)LUVW&/,LVEHLQJXQGHUVWRRGLQQHZZD\VQRWMXVWLQWHUPV RI ³QHJDWLYH´ RU ³SRVLWLYH´
WUDQVIHUIURPWKH//DGR*RWR2GOLQ&XWOHUEXWDOVRLQWHUPV
RIQDWLYHODQJXDJHWUDQVIHUEHQH¿WVIRU/OHDUQLQJ%RKQDQG%HVW&KDQJDQG0LVK-
OHU&KDQJ0RUHRYHUWKHYDULDEOHVRIDJHDQGSUR¿OHRIDFTXLVLWLRQKDYHORQJ
spurred, and continue to spur, research on differences between early and late L2 learners
<HQL.RPVKLDQHWDO*XLRQ.DQJ DQG *XLRQ2KHWDODQG
EHWZHHQW\SLFDO/OHDUQHUVDQG KHULWDJHVSHDNHUVRU/UHOHDUQHUV.QLJKWO\-XQ2K
DQG$X&KDQJ&KDQJDQG<DR$GGLWLRQDOZRUNKDVEHHQH[DPLQLQJ
the effect of other properties of the individual learner, such as language aptitude and basic
perceptual ability, in order to better understand the wide range in L2 outcomes observed
DFURVV OHDUQHUV RI WKH VDPH / EDFNJURXQG HJ &KDQJ E 3HUUDFKLRQH /HH +D
DQG:RQJ%RZOHV&KDQJDQG.DUX]LV,QSXWDQGOLQJXLVWLFIDFWRUVVXFKDV
WDONHUYDULDELOLW\ DQG SKRQRORJLFDOFRQWH[WDUHDOVREHLQJLQYHVWLJDWHGDV FRQWULEXWRUV WR
YDULDWLRQLQ/RXWFRPHVHJ%UDGORZHWDO.LQJVWRQ3HUUDFKLRQHHWDO
&KDQJDQG%RZOHV
In light of transnational migration and multilingualism across the world, these and other
lines of inquiry are poised to shape practices and policy affecting the linguistic lives of many
SHRSOH)RUH[DPSOHUHVHDUFKH[DPLQLQJWKHOLQJXLVWLFNQRZOHGJHRIKHULWDJHVSHDNHUVLQ
relation to late L2 learners is helping to inform language course design so as to better serve
WKHXQLTXHQHHGVRIKHULWDJHODQJXDJHOHDUQHUV6WXGLHVRIWKLUGODQJXDJH/OHDUQHUVDUH
LQYHVWLJDWLQJ ZKDW IDFWRUV LQÀXHQFH VSHHFK OHDUQLQJ LQ PXOWLOLQJXDO VLWXDWLRQV *DOODUGR
GHO3XHUWRKRZ/OHDUQLQJUHVHPEOHVDQGGLIIHUVIURP/OHDUQLQJ2QLVKL
:UHPEHODQGKRZ/OHDUQLQJPD\LQÀXHQFHWKHSKRQRORJLFDOUHSUHVHQWDWLRQVDQG
SURFHVVHVDVVRFLDWHGZLWKSUHYLRXVO\OHDUQHGODQJXDJHV&DEUHOOL$PDURLQOLQHZLWK
WKHPXOWLFRPSHWHQFHYLHZRIODQJXDJH GHYHORSPHQWRYHUWKHOLIHVSDQ&RRN
)LQDOO\LWZRXOGEHUHPLVVQRWWRPHQWLRQWKHZRUNRIVFKRODUVZKRDUHFRQQHFWLQJ
/VSHHFKUHVHDUFKWR/LQVWUXFWLRQDOSUDFWLFHVDQGVWUDWHJLHVVHHHJ0RUDDQG/HYNLQD
)DUIURPGHFOLQLQJUHVHDUFKLQ/VSHHFKOHDUQLQJLVWKULYLQJ:HFDQORRNIRUZDUG
to many new discoveries in the years to come, with practically relevant implications we
cannot yet imagine.
Notes
7KLVFRQWUDVWVZLWKWKHGLUHFWUHDOLVWYLHZRI3$0/ZKLFKDVVXPHVWKDWSHUFHSWLRQSURGXFWLRQ
OLQNV GR QRW KDYH WR EH OHDUQHG 8QGHU WKLV YLHZERWK SHUFHSWLRQ DQG SURGXFWLRQ DUH EDVHG LQ
articulatory gestures, so “no translation is needed between perception and production because they
DUHLQIRUPDWLRQDOO\FRPSDWLEOH´%HVWS
7KDQNVWR *HRIIUH\ 6FKZDUW] IRU SRLQWLQJ RXW WKDW GLIIHUHQW RXWFRPHV IRUDFRXVWLF SUR[LPLW\
FRXOGUHVXOWIURPH[DPLQLQJDOWHUQDWLYHPHWULFVRIYRZHOTXDOLW\HJGLVWDQFHVEHWZHHQDGMD-
cent formants such as F2 and F3FI 6\UGDO DQG *RSDO RQ WKHUROH RI IRUPDQW FRQYHU-
JHQFHV LQ YRZHO SHUFHSWLRQ ,Q WKH FDVH RI PHDVXULQJ YRZHO IURQWQHVVEDFNQHVV LQ WHUPV RI
F3íF2UDWKHU WKDQ F2 WKLVPHWULF ZKHQ DSSOLHG WRWKH SURGXFWLRQ GDWD IURPWKH VSHDNHUV LQ
&KDQJHW DO LV FRQVLVWHQW ZLWKWKHYLHZ WKDW QDWLYH (QJOLVKXM)í) %DUN
LVSKRQHWLFDOO\FORVHUWRQDWLYH0DQGDULQ\M)í) %DUNWKDQWRQDWLYH0DQGDULQX
M)í) %DUN
Second language learning and bilingualism
441
References
$KQ6&KDQJ&%'H.H\VHU5DQG/HH(OOLV6$JHHIIHFWVLQ¿UVWODQJXDJHDWWULWLRQ
Speech perception by Korean-English bilinguals. Language Learning, ±
$NDKDQH<DPDGD50F'HUPRWW($GDFKL7.DZDKDUD+DQG3UXLWW-6&RPSXWHU
EDVHG VHFRQG ODQJXDJH SURGXFWLRQ WUDLQLQJ E\ XVLQJ VSHFWURJUDSKLF UHSUHVHQWDWLRQ DQG +00
based speech recognition scores. In 3URFHHGLQJVRI WKH WK ,QWHUQDWLRQDO &RQIHUHQFHRQ6SRNHQ
/DQJXDJH3URFHVVLQJ,&6/3SDSHU6\GQH\$XVWUDOLD,QWHUQDWLRQDO6SHHFK&RP-
munication Association.
$OWHQEHUJ(3D7KHMXGJPHQWSHUFHSWLRQDQGSURGXFWLRQRIFRQVRQDQWFOXVWHUVLQDVHFRQG
language. ,QWHUQDWLRQDO5HYLHZRI$SSOLHG/LQJXLVWLFVLQ/DQJXDJH7HDFKLQJ, ±
$OWHQEHUJ(3E7KHSHUFHSWLRQRIZRUGERXQGDULHVLQDVHFRQGODQJXDJHSecond Language
Research, ±
$QWRQLRX0%HVW&77\OHU0'DQG.URRV&/DQJXDJHFRQWH[WHOLFLWVQDWLYHOLNHVWRS
voicing in early bilinguals’ productions in both L1 and L2. -RXUQDORI3KRQHWLFV, 38±
$QWRQLRX0DQG:RQJ3&09DU\LQJLUUHOHYDQWSKRQHWLFIHDWXUHVKLQGHUVOHDUQLQJRIWKH
feature being trained. 7KH-RXUQDORIWKH$FRXVWLFDO6RFLHW\RI$PHULFD, ±
$R\DPD.)OHJH-(*XLRQ6*$NDKDQH<DPDGD5DQG<DPDGD73HUFHLYHGSKR-
netic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: The case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/ and /r/. -RXUQDO
of Phonetics, ±
%DHVH%HUN007KHUHODWLRQVKLSEHWZHHQSHUFHSWLRQDQGSURGXFWLRQZKHQOHDUQLQJQRYHO
SKRQRORJLFDOFDWHJRULHV. Ph.D. thesis, Northwestern University.
%DHVH%HUN00DQG6DPXHO$*/LVWHQHUVEHZDUH6SHHFKSURGXFWLRQPD\EHEDGIRU
learning speech sounds. -RXUQDORI0HPRU\DQG/DQJXDJH, ±
%HVW&77KHHPHUJHQFHRIQDWLYHODQJXDJHSKRQRORJLFDOLQÀXHQFHVLQLQIDQWV$SHUFHSWXDO
DVVLPLODWLRQ PRGHO ,Q - & *RRGPDQ DQG + & 1XVEDXP (GV 7KH GHYHORSPHQW RI VSHHFK
SHUFHSWLRQ7KHWUDQVLWLRQ IURPVSHHFKVRXQGVWR VSRNHQZRUGVSS± &DPEULGJH0$
0,73UHVV
%HVW&7$GLUHFW UHDOLVWYLHZ RI FURVVODQJXDJH VSHHFK SHUFHSWLRQ,Q:6WUDQJH (G
6SHHFK SHUFHSWLRQ DQG OLQJXLVWLF H[SHULHQFH ,VVXHV LQ FURVVODQJXDJH UHVHDUFK SS ±
%DOWLPRUH0'<RUN3UHVV
%HVW&70F5REHUWV*:DQG*RRGHOO('LVFULPLQDWLRQRIQRQQDWLYHFRQVRQDQWFRQ-
trasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener’s native phonological system. 7KH-RXUQDO
of the Acoustical Society of America, ±
%HVW&70F5REHUWV*:DQG6LWKROH10([DPLQDWLRQRISHUFHSWXDOUHRUJDQL]DWLRQ
IRUQRQQDWLYHVSHHFKFRQWUDVWV=XOXFOLFNGLVFULPLQDWLRQE\(QJOLVKVSHDNLQJDGXOWVDQGLQIDQWV
-RXUQDORI([SHULPHQWDO3V\FKRORJ\+XPDQ3HUFHSWLRQDQG3HUIRUPDQFH, ±
%HVW&77UDLOO$&DUWHU$+DUULVRQ.'DQG)DEHU$;y}FOLFNSHUFHSWLRQE\(QJ-
OLVK,VL]XOXDQG6HVRWKROLVWHQHUV,Q0-6ROp'5HFDVHQVDQG-5RPHUR(GVProceedings
RIWKH WK LQWHUQDWLRQDOFRQJUHVVRI SKRQHWLFVFLHQFHVSS± %DUFHORQD 6SDLQ&DXVDO
Productions.
%HVW&7DQG7\OHU0'1RQQDWLYHDQGVHFRQGODQJXDJHVSHHFKSHUFHSWLRQ&RPPRQDOL-
WLHVDQGFRPSOHPHQWDULWLHV,Q26%RKQDQG0-0XQUR(GV/DQJXDJHH[SHULHQFHLQVHFRQG
ODQJXDJHVSHHFKOHDUQLQJ ,Q KRQRU RI-DPHV(PLO)OHJHSS±$PVWHUGDP7KH 1HWKHU-
lands: John Benjamins Publishing.
%RKQ26&URVVODQJXDJHDQGVHFRQGODQJXDJHVSHHFKSHUFHSWLRQ,Q(0)HUQiQGH]DQG
+6&DLUQV(GV7KHKDQGERRNRISV\FKROLQJXLVWLFVSS±+RERNHQ1--RKQ:LOH\
Sons.
%RKQ26DQG%HVW&71DWLYHODQJXDJHSKRQHWLFDQGSKRQRORJLFDOLQÀXHQFHVRQSHUFHS-
WLRQRI$PHULFDQ (QJOLVKDSSUR[LPDQWVE\ 'DQLVK DQG *HUPDQOLVWHQHUV-RXUQDO RI 3KRQHWLFV,
±
Charles B. Chang
442
%RRPHUVKLQH$ +DOO .& +XPH ( DQG-RKQVRQ . 7KH LPSDFWRIDOORSKRQ\ YHUVXV
FRQWUDVWRQVSHHFKSHUFHSWLRQ,Q3$YHU\('UHVKHUDQG.5LFH(GV&RQWUDVWLQSKRQRORJ\
SS±%HUOLQ*HUPDQ\0RXWRQGH*UX\WHU
%RZOHV$5&KDQJ&%DQG.DUX]LV933LWFKDELOLW\DVDQDSWLWXGHIRUWRQHOHDUQLQJ
Language Learning, 66±
%UDGORZ$53LVRQL'%$NDKDQH<DPDGD5DQG7RKNXUD<7UDLQLQJ-DSDQHVHOLVWHQ-
ers to identify English /r/ and /l/, IV: Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. The
-RXUQDORIWKH$FRXVWLFDO6RFLHW\RI$PHULFD, ±
%URVHORZ(DQG.DQJ<3KRQRORJ\DQGVSHHFK,Q-+HUVFKHQVRKQDQG0<RXQJ6FKROWHQ
(GV 7KH &DPEULGJH KDQGERRN RI VHFRQG ODQJXDJH DFTXLVLWLRQ SS ± &DPEULGJH
&DPEULGJH8QLYHUVLW\3UHVV
%URZQ& 7KH LQWHUUHODWLRQ EHWZHHQ VSHHFK SHUFHSWLRQDQG SKRQRORJLFDO DFTXLVLWLRQIURP
LQIDQWWRDGXOW,Q-$UFKLEDOG(G6HFRQGODQJXDJHDFTXLVLWLRQDQGOLQJXLVWLFWKHRU\SS±
0DOGHQ0$%ODFNZHOO3XEOLVKHUV
&DEUHOOL$PDUR-7HVWLQJWKHSKRQRORJLFDOSHUPHDELOLW\K\SRWKHVLV/SKRQRORJLFDOHIIHFWV
on L1 versus L2 systems. ,QWHUQDWLRQDO-RXUQDORI%LOLQJXDOLVP, ±
&DUDPD]]D$<HQL.RPVKLDQ*+=XULI(%DQG&DUERQH(7KHDFTXLVLWLRQRIDQHZ
phonological contrast: The case of stop consonants in French-English bilinguals. 7KH-RXUQDORI
the Acoustical Society of America, ±
&DWIRUG-&DQG3LVRQL'%$XGLWRU\YV$UWLFXODWRU\WUDLQLQJLQH[RWLFVRXQGVThe Mod-
HUQ/DQJXDJH-RXUQDO, ±
&HODWD&LQSUHVV3KRQRORJLFDO/DWWULWLRQ,Q066FKPLGDQG%.|SNH(GVThe Oxford
handbook of language attrition2[IRUG2[IRUG8QLYHUVLW\3UHVV
&KDQJ& %(QJOLVKORDQZRUG DGDSWDWLRQLQ%XUPHVH -RXUQDORIWKH6RXWKHDVW$VLDQ/LQ-
guistics Society, 1±
&KDQJ&%D)LUVWODQJXDJHSKRQHWLFGULIWGXULQJVHFRQGODQJXDJHDFTXLVLWLRQ. Ph.D. thesis,
8QLYHUVLW\RI&DOLIRUQLD%HUNHOH\&$
&KDQJ & % E 7KH LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ RI ODU\QJHDO FRQWUDVW LQ .RUHDQ DV D VHFRQG ODQJXDJH
Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 13±
&KDQJ&%6\VWHPLFGULIWRI/YRZHOVLQQRYLFH/OHDUQHUV,Q:6/HHDQG(=HH(GV
3URFHHGLQJVRIWKHWK LQWHUQDWLRQDOFRQJUHVVRISKRQHWLFVFLHQFHVSS ±+RQJ.RQJ
&KLQD&LW\8QLYHUVLW\RI+RQJ.RQJ
&KDQJ&%D3KRQHWLFVYV3KRQRORJ\LQORDQZRUGDGDSWDWLRQ5HYLVLWLQJWKHUROHRIWKHELOLQ-
JXDO,Q6%HUVRQ$%UDWNLHYLFK'%UXKQ$&DPSEHOO5(VFDPLOOD$*LRYLQH/1HZEROG
03HUH]03LTXHUDV%UXQHWDQG55KRPLHX[(GV3URFHHGLQJVRIWKHWKDQQXDOPHHWLQJ
RI WKH %HUNHOH\ /LQJXLVWLFV 6RFLHW\ *HQHUDO VHVVLRQ DQG SDUDVHVVLRQ RQ LQIRUPDWLRQ VWUXFWXUH
SS±%HUNHOH\&$%HUNHOH\/LQJXLVWLFV6RFLHW\
&KDQJ&%E5DSLGDQGPXOWLIDFHWHGHIIHFWVRIVHFRQGODQJXDJHOHDUQLQJRQ¿UVWODQJXDJH
speech production. -RXUQDORI3KRQHWLFV, ±
&KDQJ&%$QRYHOW\HIIHFWLQSKRQHWLFGULIWRIWKHQDWLYHODQJXDJH-RXUQDORI3KRQHWLFV,
±
&KDQJ & % 'HWHUPLQLQJ FURVVOLQJXLVWLF SKRQRORJLFDO VLPLODULW\ EHWZHHQ VHJPHQWV 7KH
SULPDF\RI DEVWUDFW DVSHFWVRI VLPLODULW\,Q ( 5DLP\ DQG& ( &DLUQV(GV The segment in
SKRQHWLFVDQGSKRQRORJ\SS±&KLFKHVWHU-RKQ:LOH\6RQV
&KDQJ&%%LOLQJXDOSHUFHSWXDOEHQH¿WVRIH[SHULHQFHZLWKDKHULWDJHODQJXDJHBilingual-
ism: Language and Cognition, ±
&KDQJ & % 3HUFHSWXDO DWWHQWLRQ DV WKH ORFXV RI WUDQVIHU WR QRQQDWLYH VSHHFK SHUFHSWLRQ
-RXUQDORI3KRQHWLFV, 68±
&KDQJ&%LQSUHVV3KRQHWLFGULIW,Q066FKPLGDQG%.|SNH(GVThe Oxford handbook of
language attrition2[IRUG2[IRUG8QLYHUVLW\3UHVV
&KDQJ& %DQG%RZOHV$5 &RQWH[WHIIHFWVRQVHFRQGODQJXDJHOHDUQLQJ RIWRQDOFRQ-
trasts. 7KH-RXUQDORIWKH$FRXVWLFDO6RFLHW\RI$PHULFD, 138±
Second language learning and bilingualism
443
&KDQJ&%DQG0LVKOHU$(YLGHQFHIRUODQJXDJHWUDQVIHUOHDGLQJWRDSHUFHSWXDODGYDQ-
tage for non-native listeners. 7KH-RXUQDORIWKH$FRXVWLFDO6RFLHW\RI$PHULFD, ±
&KDQJ&%DQG<DR<7RZDUGDQXQGHUVWDQGLQJRIKHULWDJHSURVRG\$FRXVWLFDQGSHUFHS-
WXDOSURSHUWLHVRIWRQHSURGXFHGE\KHULWDJHQDWLYHDQGVHFRQG ODQJXDJHVSHDNHUVRI0DQGDULQ
+HULWDJH/DQJXDJH-RXUQDO, 13±
&KDQJ&%<DR<+D\QHV()DQG5KRGHV53URGXFWLRQRISKRQHWLFDQGSKRQRORJL-
FDOFRQWUDVWE\KHULWDJHVSHDNHUVRI0DQGDULQ7KH-RXUQDORIWKH$FRXVWLFDO6RFLHW\RI$PHULFD,
±
&RODQWRQL / 6WHHOH - DQG (VFXGHUR 3 6HFRQG ODQJXDJH VSHHFK 7KHRU\ DQG SUDFWLFH.
&DPEULGJH&DPEULGJH8QLYHUVLW\3UHVV
&RRN9- 7KH SRYHUW\RIWKHVWLPXOXV DUJXPHQW DQG PXOWLFRPSHWHQFH Second Language
Research, ±
&RRN9-(YLGHQFHIRUPXOWLFRPSHWHQFHLanguage Learning, ±
&RRN9 - 7KHFKDQJLQJ /LQWKH/ XVHU¶VPLQG,Q 9 &RRN(GEffects of the second
ODQJXDJHRQWKH¿UVWSS±&OHYHGRQ0XOWLOLQJXDO0DWWHUV
&XWOHU$/LVWHQLQJWRDVHFRQGODQJXDJHWKURXJKWKHHDUVRID¿UVW,QWHUSUHWLQJ, 5±
'DYLGVRQ/3KRQRORJ\SKRQHWLFVRUIUHTXHQF\,QÀXHQFHVRQWKHSURGXFWLRQRIQRQQDWLYH
sequences. -RXUQDORI3KRQHWLFV, ±
'DYLGVRQ/3KRQHWLFSKRQHPLFDQGSKRQRORJLFDOIDFWRUVLQFURVVODQJXDJHGLVFULPLQDWLRQ
of phonotactic contrasts. -RXUQDO RI ([SHULPHQWDO 3V\FKRORJ\ +XPDQ 3HUFHSWLRQ DQG 3HUIRU-
mance, ±
'DYLGVRQ/&URVVODQJXDJHVSHHFKSHUFHSWLRQDQGSURGXFWLRQ,Q0$URQRII(GOxford
ELEOLRJUDSKLHVLQOLQJXLVWLFV2[IRUG2[IRUG8QLYHUVLW\3UHVV
GH%RW./RZLH:DQG9HUVSRRU0$G\QDPLFV\VWHPVWKHRU\DSSURDFKWRVHFRQGODQ-
guage acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, ±
GH/HHXZ(LQSUHVV3KRQHWLF/DWWULWLRQ,Q066FKPLGDQG%.|SNH(GVThe Oxford hand-
book of language attrition2[IRUG2[IRUG8QLYHUVLW\3UHVV
GH/HHXZ(0HQQHQ,DQG6FREELH-0'\QDPLFV\VWHPVPDWXUDWLRQDOFRQVWUDLQWVDQG
L1 phonetic attrition. ,QWHUQDWLRQDO-RXUQDORI%LOLQJXDOLVP, ±
GH/HHXZ(6FKPLG06DQG0HQQHQ,7KHHIIHFWVRIFRQWDFWRQQDWLYHODQJXDJHSURQXQ-
ciation in an L2 migrant setting. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13±
'PLWULHYD2-RQJPDQ$ DQG 6HUHQR - 3KRQRORJLFDO QHXWUDOL]DWLRQ E\ QDWLYHDQGQRQ
QDWLYHVSHDNHUV7KHFDVHRI5XVVLDQ¿QDOGHYRLFLQJ-RXUQDORI3KRQHWLFV, 38±
'XSRX[(+LURVH<.DNHKL.3DOOLHU&DQG0HKOHU-(SHQWKHWLFYRZHOVLQ-DSDQHVH
$SHUFHSWXDOLOOXVLRQ"-RXUQDORI([SHULPHQWDO3V\FKRORJ\+XPDQ3HUFHSWLRQDQG3HUIRUPDQFH,
±
(FNPDQ)50DUNHGQHVVDQGWKHFRQWUDVWLYHDQDO\VLVK\SRWKHVLVLanguage Learning,
±
(FNPDQ)57KHVWUXFWXUDOFRQIRUPLW\K\SRWKHVLVDQGWKHDFTXLVLWLRQRIFRQVRQDQWFOXVWHUV
in the interlanguage of ESL learners. 6WXGLHVLQ6HFRQG/DQJXDJH$FTXLVLWLRQ, 13±
(FNPDQ ) 5 7\SRORJLFDO PDUNHGQHVV DQG VHFRQG ODQJXDJH SKRQRORJ\ ,Q - * +DQVHQ
(GZDUGVDQG 0 / =DPSLQL(GV 3KRQRORJ\ DQG VHFRQG ODQJXDJHDFTXLVLWLRQ SS ±
Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.
(FNPDQ)56HFRQGODQJXDJHSKRQRORJ\,Q60*DVVDQG$0DFNH\(GVThe Rout-
OHGJHKDQGERRNRIVHFRQGODQJXDJHDFTXLVLWLRQSS±1HZ<RUN1<5RXWOHGJH
(OOLV1 &6HOHFWLYHDWWHQWLRQ DQGWUDQVIHUSKHQRPHQDLQ /DFTXLVLWLRQ&RQWLQJHQF\FXH
FRPSHWLWLRQ VDOLHQFH LQWHUIHUHQFH RYHUVKDGRZLQJ EORFNLQJ DQG SHUFHSWXDO OHDUQLQJ $SSOLHG
Linguistics, ±
(VFXGHUR 3 /LQJXLVWLF SHUFHSWLRQ RI ³VLPLODU´ / VRXQGV ,Q 3 %RHUVPD DQG 6 +DPDQQ
(GV3KRQRORJ\LQSHUFHSWLRQSS±%HUOLQ*HUPDQ\0RXWRQGH*UX\WHU
)OHJH-(7KHSURGXFWLRQRI³QHZ´DQG³VLPLODU´SKRQHVLQDIRUHLJQODQJXDJH(YLGHQFHIRU
WKHHIIHFWRIHTXLYDOHQFHFODVVL¿FDWLRQ-RXUQDORI3KRQHWLFV, 15±
Charles B. Chang
444
)OHJH-(6HFRQGODQJXDJHVSHHFKOHDUQLQJ7KHRU\¿QGLQJVDQGSUREOHPV,Q:6WUDQJH
(G6SHHFK SHUFHSWLRQDQGOLQJXLVWLFH[SHULHQFH ,VVXHV LQ FURVVODQJXDJHUHVHDUFKSS ±
%DOWLPRUH0'<RUN3UHVV
)OHJH-((QJOLVKYRZHOSURGXFWLRQVE\'XWFKWDONHUV0RUHHYLGHQFHIRUWKH³VLPLODU´YV
³QHZ´GLVWLQFWLRQ,Q$-DPHVDQG-/HDWKHU(GV6HFRQGODQJXDJHVSHHFK6WUXFWXUHDQGSUR-
cessSS±%HUOLQ*HUPDQ\0RXWRQGH*UX\WHU
)OHJH-(,QWHUDFWLRQVEHWZHHQWKHQDWLYHDQGVHFRQGODQJXDJHSKRQHWLFV\VWHPV,Q3%XU-
PHLVWHU73LVNHDQG$ 5RKGH (GV $QLQWHJUDWHGYLHZRIODQJXDJHGHYHORSPHQW3DSHUVLQ
honor of Henning WodeSS±7ULHU*HUPDQ\:LVVHQVFKDIWOLFKHU9HUODJ
)OHJH - ( DQG (HIWLQJ : D &URVVODQJXDJH VZLWFKLQJ LQ VWRS FRQVRQDQW SHUFHSWLRQ DQG
SURGXFWLRQE\'XWFKVSHDNHUVRI(QJOLVK6SHHFK&RPPXQLFDWLRQ, 6±
)OHJH-(DQG (HIWLQJ:E3URGXFWLRQ DQGSHUFHSWLRQRI(QJOLVKVWRSV E\QDWLYH6SDQLVK
VSHDNHUV-RXUQDORI3KRQHWLFV, 15±
)OHJH- (0DF.D\,5$DQG0HDGRU'1DWLYH ,WDOLDQVSHDNHUV¶SHUFHSWLRQDQGSUR-
duction of English vowels. 7KH-RXUQDORIWKH$FRXVWLFDO6RFLHW\RI$PHULFD, ±
)RNHV-%RQG=6DQG6WHLQEHUJ0$FTXLVLWLRQRIWKH(QJOLVKYRLFLQJFRQWUDVWE\$UDE
children. /DQJXDJHDQG6SHHFK, ±
*DOODUGRGHO3XHUWR),V/SKRQRORJLFDOFRPSHWHQFHDIIHFWHGE\WKHOHDUQHU¶VOHYHORIELOLQ-
JXDOLVP",QWHUQDWLRQDO-RXUQDORI0XOWLOLQJXDOLVP, ±
*DVV6'HYHORSPHQWRIVSHHFKSHUFHSWLRQDQGVSHHFKSURGXFWLRQLQDGXOWVHFRQGODQJXDJH
learners. $SSOLHG3V\FKROLQJXLVWLFV, 5±
*RGIURLG$/LQ&+DQG5\X&+HDULQJDQGVHHLQJWRQHWKURXJKFRORU$QHI¿FDF\VWXG\
RIZHEEDVHGPXOWLPRGDO&KLQHVHWRQHSHUFHSWLRQWUDLQLQJLanguage Learning, ±
*RWR+$XGLWRU\SHUFHSWLRQE\QRUPDO-DSDQHVHDGXOWVRIWKHVRXQGV³/´DQG³5´1HXURSV\-
chologia, ±
*XLRQ6*7KHYRZHOV\VWHPVRI4XLFKXD6SDQLVKELOLQJXDOV$JHRIDFTXLVLWLRQHIIHFWVRQ
WKHPXWXDOLQÀXHQFHRIWKH¿UVWDQGVHFRQGODQJXDJHVPhonetica, ±
+DJLZDUD5'LDOHFWYDULDWLRQDQGIRUPDQWIUHTXHQF\7KH$PHULFDQ(QJOLVK YRZHOVUHYLV-
ited. 7KH-RXUQDORIWKH$FRXVWLFDO6RFLHW\RI$PHULFD, ±
+DOOp3$DQG%HVW&7'HQWDOWRYHODUSHUFHSWXDODVVLPLODWLRQ$FURVVOLQJXLVWLFVWXG\RI
WKHSHUFHSWLRQRIGHQWDOVWRSOFOXVWHUV7KH-RXUQDORIWKH$FRXVWLFDO6RFLHW\RI$PHULFD,
±
+DQFLQ%KDWW%6HFRQGODQJXDJHSKRQRORJ\LQRSWLPDOLW\WKHRU\,Q-*+DQVHQ(GZDUGV
DQG0/=DPSLQL(GV3KRQRORJ\DQGVHFRQGODQJXDJHDFTXLVLWLRQSS±$PVWHU-
dam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.
+D]DQ96HFRQGODQJXDJHDFTXLVLWLRQDQG H[HPSODUWKHRU\,Q-7URXYDLQDQG:-%DUU\
(GV 3URFHHGLQJV RI WKH WK LQWHUQDWLRQDO FRQJUHVV RI SKRQHWLF VFLHQFHV SS ± 'XG-
ZHLOHU*HUPDQ\3LUURW
+ROOLGD\--6HFRQGODQJXDJHH[SHULHQFHFDQKLQGHUWKHGLVFULPLQDWLRQRIQRQQDWLYHSKRQR-
logical contrasts. Phonetica, ±
-RKQVRQ . 6SHHFK SHUFHSWLRQ ZLWKRXW VSHDNHU QRUPDOL]DWLRQ $Q H[HPSODUPRGHO ,Q .
-RKQVRQDQG- :0XOOHQQL[(GV7DONHU YDULDELOLW\ LQ VSHHFKSURFHVVLQJSS ± 6DQ
'LHJR&$$FDGHPLF3UHVV
.DQJ.+DQG*XLRQ6*3KRQRORJLFDOV\VWHPVLQELOLQJXDOV$JHRIOHDUQLQJHIIHFWVRQ
the stop consonant systems of Korean-English bilinguals. 7KH-RXUQDORIWKH$FRXVWLFDO6RFLHW\RI
America, ±
.DQJ<,QWHUODQJXDJHVHJPHQWDO PDSSLQJDVHYLGHQFHIRU WKHQDWXUHRIOH[LFDO UHSUHVHQWD-
tion. /DQJXDJHDQG/LQJXLVWLFV&RPSDVV, ±
.DUWXVKLQD16HFRQGODQJXDJHSKRQRORJLFDODFTXLVLWLRQLQDGXOWV. Ph.D. thesis, University
RI*HQHYD
.DUWXVKLQD1DQG)UDXHQIHOGHU8+2QWKHHIIHFWVRI/SHUFHSWLRQDQGRILQGLYLGXDOGLI-
ferences in L1 production on L2 pronunciation. Frontiers in Psychology, 5
Second language learning and bilingualism
445
.DUWXVKLQD1 )UDXHQIHOGHU8+ DQG*ROHVWDQL1 +RZ DQGZKHQGRHVWKH VHFRQG ODQ-
JXDJHLQÀXHQFHWKHSURGXFWLRQRIQDWLYHVSHHFKVRXQGV$OLWHUDWXUHUHYLHZLanguage Learning,
666±
.DUWXVKLQD1+HUYDLV$GHOPDQ$ )UDXHQIHOGHU8 +DQG*ROHVWDQL 1 7KH HIIHFW RI
SKRQHWLF SURGXFWLRQ WUDLQLQJ ZLWK YLVXDO IHHGEDFN RQ WKH SHUFHSWLRQ DQG SURGXFWLRQ RI IRUHLJQ
speech sounds. 7KH-RXUQDORIWKH$FRXVWLFDO6RFLHW\RI$PHULFD, 138±
.HDWLQJ3$3KRQHWLFDQGSKRQRORJLFDOUHSUHVHQWDWLRQRIVWRSFRQVRQDQWYRLFLQJLanguage,
±
.LQJVWRQ-/HDUQLQJIRUHLJQYRZHOV/DQJXDJHDQG6SHHFK, ±±
.QLJKWO\/0-XQ6$2K-6DQG$X7.3URGXFWLRQEHQH¿WVRIFKLOGKRRGRYHUKHDU-
ing. 7KH-RXUQDORIWKH$FRXVWLFDO6RFLHW\RI$PHULFD, ±
.XKO3.+XPDQDGXOWVDQGKXPDQLQIDQWVVKRZD³SHUFHSWXDOPDJQHWHIIHFW´IRUWKHSURWR-
W\SHVRIVSHHFKFDWHJRULHVPRQNH\VGRQRW3HUFHSWLRQDQG3V\FKRSK\VLFV, ±
.XKO3.&RQER\%7&RIIH\&RULQD63DGGHQ'5LYHUD*D[LROD0DQG1HOVRQ7
Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: New data and native language magnet theory expanded
1/0H3KLORVRSKLFDO7UDQVDFWLRQVRIWKH5R\DO6RFLHW\%, 363±
.XKO 3 . DQG ,YHUVRQ 3 /LQJXLVWLF H[SHULHQFH DQG WKH ³3HUFHSWXDO 0DJQHW (IIHFW´ ,Q
:6WUDQJH(G6SHHFKSHUFHSWLRQDQGOLQJXLVWLFH[SHULHQFH,VVXHVLQFURVVODQJXDJHUHVHDUFK
SS±%DOWLPRUH0'<RUN3UHVV
/D&KDULWp'DQG3DUDGLV&&DWHJRU\SUHVHUYDWLRQDQGSUR[LPLW\YHUVXVSKRQHWLFDSSUR[L-
mation in loanword adaptation. /LQJXLVWLF,QTXLU\, 36±
/DGHIRJHG3$PHULFDQ(QJOLVK,Q7KH,QWHUQDWLRQDO3KRQHWLF$VVRFLDWLRQ(GHandbook
RIWKHLQWHUQDWLRQDOSKRQHWLFDVVRFLDWLRQ$JXLGHWRWKHXVHRIWKHLQWHUQDWLRQDOSKRQHWLFDOSKDEHW
SS±&DPEULGJH&DPEULGJH8QLYHUVLW\3UHVV
/DGR5 /LQJXLVWLFV DFURVVFXOWXUHV$SSOLHGOLQJXLVWLFVIRUODQJXDJHWHDFKHUV. Ann Arbor,
0,8QLYHUVLW\RI0LFKLJDQ3UHVV
/DHXIHU&7RZDUGVDW\SRORJ\RIELOLQJXDOSKRQRORJLFDOV\VWHPV,Q$-DPHVDQG-/HDWKHU
(GV6HFRQGODQJXDJHVSHHFK6WUXFWXUHDQGSURFHVVSS±%HUOLQ*HUPDQ\0RXWRQ
GH*UX\WHU
/HDFK/DQG6DPXHO$*/H[LFDOFRQ¿JXUDWLRQDQGOH[LFDOHQJDJHPHQW:KHQDGXOWVOHDUQ
new words. Cognitive Psychology, 55±
/HDWKHU - ,QWHUUHODWLRQ RI SHUFHSWXDO DQG SURGXFWLYH OHDUQLQJ LQ WKH LQLWLDO DFTXLVLWLRQ RI
VHFRQGODQJXDJHWRQH,Q$-DPHVDQG-/HDWKHU(GV6HFRQGODQJXDJHVSHHFK6WUXFWXUHDQG
SURFHVVSS±%HUOLQ*HUPDQ\0RXWRQGH*UX\WHU
/HY\(6DQG6WUDQJH:3HUFHSWLRQRI)UHQFKYRZHOVE\$PHULFDQ(QJOLVKDGXOWVZLWKDQG
without French language experience. -RXUQDORI3KRQHWLFV, 36±
/L$DQG3RVW%/DFTXLVLWLRQRISURVRGLFSURSHUWLHVRIVSHHFKUK\WKP(YLGHQFHIURP/
0DQGDULQDQG*HUPDQOHDUQHUVRI(QJOLVK6WXGLHVLQ6HFRQG/DQJXDJH$FTXLVLWLRQ, 36±
/LEHUPDQ$ 0+DUULV . 6+RIIPDQ + 6 DQG *ULI¿WK % & 7KH GLVFULPLQDWLRQRI
speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. -RXUQDORI([SHULPHQWDO3V\FKRORJ\,
±
0DFN0&RQVRQDQWDQGYRZHOSHUFHSWLRQDQGSURGXFWLRQ(DUO\(QJOLVK)UHQFKELOLQJXDOV
and English monolinguals. 3HUFHSWLRQDQG3V\FKRSK\VLFV, ±
0DFN03KRQHWLFWUDQVIHULQ D )UHQFK(QJOLVK ELOLQJXDO FKLOG ,Q 3+ 1HOGH (G Lan-
JXDJHDWWLWXGHVDQGODQJXDJHFRQÀLFWSS±%RQQ*HUPDQ\'PPOHU
0DFN0 7KH SKRQHWLF V\VWHPV RIELOLQJXDOV,Q07 %DQLFK DQG 0 0DFN (GV Mind,
EUDLQDQGODQJXDJH0XOWLGLVFLSOLQDU\SHUVSHFWLYHVSS ±0DKZDK1-/DZUHQFH(UO-
baum Press.
0DMRU5&/RVLQJ(QJOLVKDVD¿UVWODQJXDJH7KH0RGHUQ/DQJXDJH-RXUQDO, ±
0DMRU5 &/DFTXLVLWLRQ/ORVVDQGWKHFULWLFDOSHULRG K\SRWKHVLV ,Q$-DPHVDQG-
/HDWKHU(GV6HFRQGODQJXDJHVSHHFK6WUXFWXUHDQGSURFHVVSS±%HUOLQ*HUPDQ\
0RXWRQGH*UX\WHU
Charles B. Chang
446
0DMRU5 & )RUHLJQ DFFHQW 7KH RQWRJHQ\ DQG SK\ORJHQ\ RI VHFRQGODQJXDJHSKRQRORJ\.
0DKZDK1-/DZUHQFH(UOEDXP$VVRFLDWHV
0HQQHQ,%H\RQGVHJPHQWV7RZDUGVD/LQWRQDWLRQOHDUQLQJWKHRU\,Q('HODLV5RXV-
VDULH0$YDQ]LDQG6+HUPHQW(GV3URVRG\DQGODQJXDJHLQFRQWDFW/DFTXLVLWLRQDWWULWLRQ
and languages in multilingual situationsSS±%HUOLQ*HUPDQ\6SULQJHU9HUODJ
0HQQHQ,DQGGH/HHXZ(%H\RQGVHJPHQWV3URVRG\LQ6/$Studies in Second Language
$FTXLVLWLRQ, 36±
0RUD-&DQG/HYNLQD07DVNEDVHGSURQXQFLDWLRQWHDFKLQJDQGUHVHDUFK.H\LVVXHVDQG
future directions. 6WXGLHVLQ6HFRQG/DQJXDJH$FTXLVLWLRQ, ±
2GOLQ 7 /DQJXDJH WUDQVIHU &URVVOLQJXLVWLF LQÀXHQFH LQ ODQJXDJH OHDUQLQJ &DPEULGJH
&DPEULGJH8QLYHUVLW\3UHVV
2K*(*XLRQ$QGHUVRQ6$R\DPD.)OHJH-($NDKDQH<DPDGD5DQG<DPDGD7
A one-year longitudinal study of English and Japanese vowel production by Japanese adults and
FKLOGUHQLQDQ(QJOLVKVSHDNLQJVHWWLQJ-RXUQDORI3KRQHWLFV, ±
2QLVKL+ &URVVOLQJXLVWLFLQÀXHQFH LQWKLUGODQJXDJHSHUFHSWLRQ/ DQG/SHUFHSWLRQRI
-DSDQHVHFRQWUDVWV. Ph.D. thesis, University of Arizona.
3HSHUNDPS6DQG%RXFKRQ&7KHUHODWLRQEHWZHHQSHUFHSWLRQDQGSURGXFWLRQLQ/SKR-
nological processing. In 3URFHHGLQJV RI WKH WK LQWHUQDWLRQDO FRQIHUHQFH RQ VSRNHQ ODQJXDJH
SURFHVVLQJ,QWHUVSHHFKSS±)ORUHQFH ,WDO\,QWHUQDWLRQDO6SHHFK&RPPXQLFD-
tion Association.
3HUUDFKLRQH7./HH-+D/<<DQG:RQJ3&0 /HDUQLQJDQRYHOSKRQRORJLFDO
contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design. The
-RXUQDORIWKH$FRXVWLFDO6RFLHW\RI$PHULFD, ±
3LHUUHKXPEHUW-([HPSODUG\QDPLFV:RUGIUHTXHQF\OHQLWLRQDQGFRQWUDVW,Q-%\EHHDQG
3+RSSHU(GV)UHTXHQF\HIIHFWVDQGWKHHPHUJHQFHRIOH[LFDOVWUXFWXUHSS±$PVWHU-
dam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.
3ROND/&URVVODQJXDJHVSHHFKSHUFHSWLRQLQDGXOWV3KRQHPLFSKRQHWLFDQGDFRXVWLFFRQWUL-
butions. 7KH-RXUQDORIWKH$FRXVWLFDO6RFLHW\RI$PHULFD, ±
3ROND/&KDUDFWHUL]LQJWKHLQÀXHQFHRIQDWLYHODQJXDJHH[SHULHQFHRQDGXOWVSHHFKSHUFHS-
tion. 3HUFHSWLRQDQG3V\FKRSK\VLFV, ±
3ROND / DQG %RKQ 2 6 $ FURVVODQJXDJH FRPSDULVRQ RI YRZHO SHUFHSWLRQ LQ (QJOLVK
OHDUQLQJDQG*HUPDQOHDUQLQJLQIDQWV7KH-RXUQDORIWKH$FRXVWLFDO6RFLHW\RI$PHULFD,
±
3RUW5)DQG0LWOHE)06HJPHQWDOIHDWXUHVDQGLPSOHPHQWDWLRQLQDFTXLVLWLRQRI(QJOLVK
E\$UDELFVSHDNHUV-RXUQDORI3KRQHWLFV, 11±
6FKZDUW]*:RUGERXQGDULHVLQ/VSHHFK(YLGHQFHIURP3ROLVKOHDUQHUVRI(QJOLVKSec-
ond Language Research, ±
6KHOGRQ$DQG6WUDQJH:7KHDFTXLVLWLRQRIUDQGO E\ -DSDQHVH OHDUQHUV RI(QJOLVK
Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. $SSOLHG3V\FKROLQJXLVWLFV, 3
±
6LPRQHW 0 7KH SKRQHWLFV DQG SKRQRORJ\ RI ELOLQJXDOLVP ,Q Oxford handbooks online
SS±2[IRUG2[IRUG8QLYHUVLW\3UHVV
6WUDQJH : $XWRPDWLF 6HOHFWLYH 3HUFHSWLRQ $63 RI ¿UVW DQG VHFRQG ODQJXDJH VSHHFK
$ZRUNLQJPRGHO-RXUQDORI3KRQHWLFV, ±
6WUDQJH: /HY\(DQG/HKQKROI5 -U3HUFHSWXDODVVLPLODWLRQRI)UHQFK DQG *HUPDQ
vowels by American English monolinguals: Acoustic similarity does not predict perceptual simi-
larity. 7KH-RXUQDORIWKH$FRXVWLFDO6RFLHW\RI$PHULFD, 11 5
6\UGDO$.DQG *RSDO+6$SHUFHSWXDOPRGHORIYRZHOUHFRJQLWLRQEDVHGRQWKHDXGL-
tory representation of American English vowels. 7KH-RXUQDORIWKH$FRXVWLFDO6RFLHW\RI$PHULFD,
±
Second language learning and bilingualism
447
7DMLPD..DWR+5RWKZHOO$$NDKDQH<DPDGD5DQG0XQKDOO.*7UDLQLQJ(QJOLVK
listeners to perceive phonemic length contrasts in Japanese. 7KH-RXUQDORIWKH$FRXVWLFDO6RFLHW\
of America, ±
7LFH 0 DQG :RRGOH\ 0 3DJXHWWHV DQG EDVWULHV 1RYLFH )UHQFK OHDUQHUV VKRZ VKLIWV LQ
native phoneme boundaries. 8&%HUNHOH\3KRQRORJ\/DE$QQXDO5HSRUW±
7RELQ6-1DP+DQG)RZOHU&$3KRQHWLFGULIWLQ6SDQLVK(QJOLVKELOLQJXDOV([SHUL-
ment and a self-organizing model. -RXUQDORI3KRQHWLFV, 65±
7XFNHU*5$JOREDOSHUVSHFWLYHRQELOLQJXDOLVPDQGELOLQJXDOHGXFDWLRQ,Q-($ODWLVDQG
$+7DQ(GV /DQJXDJH LQ RXUWLPH%LOLQJXDO HGXFDWLRQ DQG RI¿FLDO (QJOLVK(ERQLFVDQG
VWDQGDUG(QJOLVKLPPLJUDWLRQDQGWKH8Q]LQLWLDWLYHSS±:DVKLQJWRQ'&*HRUJHWRZQ
University Press.
7\OHU0'%HVW&7)DEHU$DQG/HYLWW$*3HUFHSWXDODVVLPLODWLRQDQGGLVFULPLQD-
tion of non-native vowel contrasts. Phonetica, ±
YDQ/HXVVHQ-:DQG(VFXGHUR3/HDUQLQJWRSHUFHLYHDQGUHFRJQL]HDVHFRQGODQJXDJH
The L2LP model revised. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1000.
YDQ0HUULsQERHU--*DQG6ZHOOHU-&RJQLWLYHORDGWKHRU\DQGFRPSOH[OHDUQLQJ5HFHQW
developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, ±
:DQJ<-RQJPDQ$DQG6HUHQR-$$FRXVWLFDQGSHUFHSWXDOHYDOXDWLRQRI0DQGDULQWRQH
productions before and after perceptual training. 7KH-RXUQDORIWKH$FRXVWLFDO6RFLHW\RI$PHULFD,
113±
:DQJ < 6SHQFH 0 0 -RQJPDQ $ DQG 6HUHQR - $ 7UDLQLQJ $PHULFDQ OLVWHQHUV WR
SHUFHLYH0DQGDULQWRQHV7KH-RXUQDORIWKH$FRXVWLFDO6RFLHW\RI$PHULFD, ±
:HLQUHLFK 8 /DQJXDJHVLQFRQWDFW )LQGLQJVDQGSUREOHPV. The Hague, The Netherlands:
0RXWRQGH*UX\WHU
:HUNHU-)DQG&XUWLQ635,0,5$GHYHORSPHQWDOIUDPHZRUNRILQIDQWVSHHFKSURFHVV-
ing. /DQJXDJH/HDUQLQJDQG'HYHORSPHQW, 1±
:LOOLDPV/7KHSHUFHSWLRQRIVWRSFRQVRQDQWYRLFLQJE\6SDQLVK(QJOLVKELOLQJXDOV3HUFHS-
WLRQDQG3V\FKRSK\VLFV, ±
:LOOLDPV/7KHPRGL¿FDWLRQRIVSHHFKSHUFHSWLRQDQGSURGXFWLRQLQVHFRQGODQJXDJHOHDUQ-
ing. 3HUFHSWLRQDQG3V\FKRSK\VLFV, ±
:UHPEHO0927SDWWHUQVLQWKHDFTXLVLWLRQRIWKLUGODQJXDJHSKRQRORJ\Concordia Work-
LQJ3DSHUVLQ$SSOLHG/LQJXLVWLFV, 5±
<HQL.RPVKLDQ * + )OHJH - ( DQG /LX 6 3URQXQFLDWLRQ SUR¿FLHQF\ LQ WKH ¿UVW DQG
second languages of Korean-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3
±
=VLJD(([WHUQDO VDQGKL LQ D VHFRQGODQJXDJH7KH SKRQHWLFV DQG SKRQRORJ\ RIREVWUXHQW
nasalization in Korean and Korean-accented English. Language, ±