ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

Created in 2009, bitcoin reaches record heights every week, having hit 17,000on11December2017thefirstdayabitcoinfuturescontracttradedattheCBOEversus17,000 on 11 December 2017 - the first day a bitcoin futures contract traded at the CBOE - versus 1,000 in early 2017 and $1 in 2001. Yet there is still no consensus among economists whether bitcoin comprises a new decentralised currency free of central bank influence, or is a purely speculative instrument.
Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3103706
1
Eric PICHET, Professor, KEDGE-Business School
Eric PICHET, Kedge Business School, Paris Campus 56 rue de la Victoire 75009 PARIS.
eric.pichet@kedgebs.com
BITCOIN: SPECULATIVE BUBBLE OR FUTURE VALUE?
Published in The Conversation (French edition) 28 November 2017
Created in 2009, bitcoin reaches record heights every week, having hit $17,000 on 11
December 2017 - the first day a bitcoin futures contract traded at the CBOE - versus $1,000 in
early 2017 and $1 in 2001. Yet there is still no consensus among economists whether bitcoin
comprises a new decentralised currency free of central bank influence, or is a purely
speculative instrument.
1. The essence of bitcoin
Bitcoin was first issued in 2009 and valued at parity with one US dollar. This digital (or
crypto-)currency is a unit of account stored in electronic form1. Its creator, the mythical and
mysterious Satoshi Nakamoto, had had the genius idea of developing a new technologies-
based currency issuance and trading system that would be perfectly secured, at least for the
moment, by participants’ use of decentralised online transaction validation system (called
blockchain) in which each deal is authenticated by “miners” remunerated through the
creation of new bitcoins sourced from a virtual mine. The algorithm limits the total amount
of bitcoin created at 21 million units by the year 2141. 18 million had already been issued by
December 2017 but given that around 20% are never replaced (for instance, when holders
lose access to their private account), the real number of units actually in circulation is around
5 million. Despite being entirely de-materialised, bitcoin possesses some of the characteristics
of a real acephalous currency. Like all crypto-currencies, it has no intrinsic value, not even as
1 In 2017 there were 700 other crypto-currencies surfing the same wave of speculative interest, usually driven by
relatively youthful traders. Bitcoin accounts for 80% of all crypto-currency capitalisation, epitomising the
economic dictum that the winner takes all”, i.e. the first to set up shop in a new market tends to dominate it.
This may also be another indication of that a bubble is forming, given all the different assets being created at the
same time. The conclusion here is that these are speculative instruments rather than real currencies.
Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3103706
2
a collectors item, due to its immateriality. As a result and unlike official currencies, it can
never be booked as a central bank or financial institution liability. Nor is it a financial asset
like a stock or bond, since it generates no return. The only investment value resides in the
higher price that prospective buyers are willing to pay. In short, bitcoin is a commodity
lacking an underlying asset, with investors only able to recover their initial currency stake if
someone buys their holdings off of them. As the Banque de France has correctly noted2, like
other virtual currencies bitcoin is not a means of payment in the sense that European
legislation attributes to this term. It offers users no protection, whether a redemption
guarantee or against fraudulent transaction. In France, the conversion of virtual currency into
euros or foreign currencies is equated with a payment service and regulated by the Autorité de
Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution3.
2. Secondary market and blockchain-based trade validations
Thanks to the cryptographic blockchain clearing mechanism enabling un-mediated inter-
account bitcoin transfers, this kind of open system is extremely reliable. Bitcoin holders -
whether miners operating in the primary market or secondary market purchasers can re-sell
using encryption and pseudonyms. This is what differentiates bitcoin from cash, where
payments are entirely anonymous. The bitcoin market is only semi-anonymous given the
theoretical possibility of ascending the different blockchain stages. It is, however, more
anonymous than bank transfers. The fact that deals are done using pseudonyms means they
should also be less costly and more discreet than bank transfers4. All in all, bitcoin has created
a new space for financial trading, somewhere between official transactions and cash, a market
that is totally anonymous and cost-free albeit unsecured. As such, its most accurate
description is as a pseudo-currency that is, additionally, pseudonymic.
To own bitcoin, all someone has to do is open a virtual account (called wallet in slang) and
pay official currency to a seller found either on the trading platform or else over-the-counter
(where trading can be as as easy as sending e-mail). As a result, there are billions of potential
participants in this market, attracted by the possibility of purchasing bitcoin fractions (up to
eight decimals points or one-one hundred millionth of a bitcoin). The end effect is that almost
2
3
4 Intermediaries using trading platforms are sometimes paid substantial commissions.
3
everyone can speculate in this intangible asset. In addition, bitcoins use as a means of
payment has been expanding constantly since WordPress announced on 16 November 2012
that it could be used to pay for the companys commercial services. General interest has also
been bolstered by the fact that payment is cost-free and requires no bank intermediation. The
authorities have also given their blessing, with countries that first prohibited bitcoin - like
Thailand in 2013 or Russia in 2014 - both reversing their stance in 2016. More recent
evidence of its success is the fact that by November 2017 there were nearly 1,700 bitcoin cash
points worldwide. Today it is estimated that somewhere between 10 and 15 million
individuals hold bitcoin, creating in turn a funnel effect, i.e. given the limited supply, the
media buzz has accentuated the global demand for bitcoin, causing the price to rise. The
relative rarity of this virtual product offers a robust explanation for its price rise. In turn, this
indicates what the pricing effects would be if the main factor driving the speculative bubble -
FOMO (or the Fear of Missing Out) - were to spread to just 1% of the global population.
3. Buyer motivation
Four main motivations have been identified so far: the trade in illegal products; money
laundering and tax fraud; flight out of currencies depreciating as a result of hyper-inflation;
and pure speculation. Bitcoin buyers are motivated, for instance, by a desire to launder money
obtained through corruption. China accounted for 80% of all bitcoing transactions last year,
largely for reasons like this but also because many Chinese enjoy a speculative flutter.
Nor is it impossible that bitcoins current astronomical rise is also related to Saudi Arabias
recent anti-corruption campaign. A number of wealthy individuals whose money can no
longer leave that country might be trying to use bitcoin to achieve this goal (a process where
they abandon legal transactions for the “Darknet”).
Some residents in hyper-inflationary countries have started purchasing bitcoin instead of their
benchmark currency, being the US dollar someplace like Venezuela or the euro in other zones
of influence. Rather than a search for salvation, such behavior represents a flight forward.
With a financial asset as unstable as this, the economy finds itself stuck between Scylla and
Charybdis. It is entirely unrealistic to suggest that bitcoin might rival the worlds two leading
currencies one day.
4
4. An archetypical bubble
Bitcoin has soared past gold when its price exceede $15,000 in early December 2017 (at a
time that gold was trading around $1,300/ounce). The comparison makes little sense,
however, since the total value of all the bitcoin ever issued - around $180 billion - is far below
the total capitalisation of the world gold stock ($8 trillion), without mentioning the $150
trillion currently invested in financial assets and $240 trillion in property worldwide. At
$15,000 per bitcoin, however, a bubble has definitely formed, one congruent with the
definition customarily attributed to this term relating to an asset purchased solely to capture a
price rise without no concern for intrinsic value. New bitcoin buyers know nothing about the
currency and simply acquire it in the hope they can re-sell at twice the price two months later.
The problem with a bubble is the impossibility of predicting how far and how long it will go.
It is inevitable that bitcoin prices will crash one day but no one knows when or to what extent.
Of course, the bitcoin bubble may be nothing else than the latest in a long series of
speculative follies that have regularly stirred the world of finance since the Tulipmania of
1637, Laws system in 1820 or the 2000 dot.com bubble. Having said that, it has singularities
that render it unique (a reality some of its supporters misrepresent to further argue, as has
been done so many times before, that this time its different). Even more than the 2000
dot.com bubble, this speculative instrument probably constitutes the first hyper-modern
bubble, given its complete immateriality. The globalised network means there are potentially
7 billion buyers (especially since it can be divided up to eight decimal points), largely
explaining the funnel effect materialising, inter alia, in the first bitcoin futures contract that
began trading in December 2017.
5. Who and what might kill off bitcoin
The main question under these conditions is exactly how the bubble will pop. One possibility
would be widespread theft (i.e., password hacking, the old culprit) or someone penetrating the
blockchain system, flooding the market with false bitcoin and causing the price to collapse.
Bitcoins famous blockchain security system is split between thousands of computers
worldwide and considered infallible and inviolable even if history teaches that no private
security system is 100% safe. The process is, however very different than, for instance,
storing gold at a central bank. Paradoxically, the risk - long considered marginal - has become
increasingly plausible precisely because the price rise increases potential profits hence
5
incentivises sophisticated hackers to penetrate the system and create millions of false bitcoins,
flooding the market and sending prices crashing.
The second possible outcome might see all national authorities and central banks deciding
jointly to prohibit bitcoin as a means of payment, all in the name of the battle against fraud. It
should be remembered that in 2013, the US authorities closed Silk Road, a company that used
bitcoin as a means of payment for the drug trade. Given leading nations ever growing and
shared desire to coordinate the battle against money laundering, tax havens and terrorism
funding, it is very possible that the same sort of initiative might be taken against bitcoin.
It is also possible that central banks will, for the sake of financial stability, ask national
legislatures to prohibit bitcoin as a means of payment. Even if bitcoin is currently considered
legal tender nowhere in the world, it is also not really prohibited anywhere - with, as
aforementioned, countries like Thailand and Russia having reversed their previous
prohibition.
6. The risks of bitcoin and what will remain from this experiment
A collapse in bitcoin prices is not a serious danger for the real economy given that total
investment in this crypto-currency is much lower than its current capitalisation (around $180
billion). Bitcoin speculation is like gambling at a casino. The fact that money has been
exchanged does not mean that any additional value has been created. People who dream of
becoming billionaires are bound to be disappointed. On top of this, anyone whose bitcoin
purchase was funded through bank loans will have to pay them back although total
borrowing associated with this particular form of speculation is much lower that subprime
debt had been. It is therefore unlikely bursting the bitcoin bubble will trigger a series of crises.
Instead, the effect should be similar to what happens when a giant casino shuts down.
At the same time, blockchain and decentralised transaction validation mechanisms hold real
promise and are likely to become the most interesting legacy from this adventure. In the
future, secure decentralised systems using blockchain-like innovations will rival traditional
trusted third parties (banks, notaries, etc.), if only because they cost less. In and of itself, this
would be a revolution.
6
As for central banks, they will still be here in the medium term (although it is worth recalling
that from 1830 to 1913 the United States prospered without any such institution). If they do
disappear, however, the market will sell-regulate. Of course, the environment will become
extremely uncertain, featuring recurring bank failures although (and to repeat), this did not
prevent the United States from experiencing rapid development in the 19th century.
CONCLUSION
Any remotely lucid observer knows that even if it were possible to short-sell bitcoin, the
strategy is prohibited and potentially disastrous. After all, it is impossible to predict how long
and how high this speculative wave is going to go. As Keynes once wrote, A market can
remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent. All that is left is to sit this one out and
wait for the rivers of fortune to carry off bitcoin and its debris.
... In the context of the financial market, irrational herding occurs when investors follow the crowd without their own beliefs [3]. This behavior can lead to market inefficiencies, which contribute to the formation of speculative bubbles [8,11]. Numerous empirical research studies have employed the CSAD (Cross-sectional absolute deviation of return) method developed by Chang, et al. [3] to study herd behavior in financial markets, which is an enhancement of the CSSD (Cross-sectional standard deviation of return) model by Christie and Huang [4]. ...
... As a result, FoMO often leads to irrational decision-making and speculative bubbles. Morris [10] and Pichet [11]. Bo [12] observed that during market volatility, young investors' fear of missing out is influenced by risk aversion and their confidence in the market. ...
Article
Full-text available
This research investigated the correlation between herd behavior and the fear of missing out (FoMO) in Vietnam’s security market, focusing on their combined impact on investor decisions and market stability. The authors used a survey of 212 individual investors whose data were collected through a questionnaire, with responses measured on a 7-point Likert scale from March 2024 to April 2024. Additionally, the article applied Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient to assess the relationship between these two behaviors. The findings demonstrated a significant positive correlation between herd behavior and FoMO. Investors who had a tendency for FoMO were more likely to follow herd behavior, especially during volatile markets; these behaviors tend to occur together. In conclusion, the article not only emphasized the importance of controlling psychological biases to enhance market stability but also addressed these behaviors that can help minimize speculative bubbles. The results of this research have important implications for improving Vietnam’s stock market efficiency and competitiveness. By recognizing potential biases that may influence their investment decisions, investors can adopt different strategies to mitigate the impact of such biases on their financial outcomes.
... Also, our study suggests what indexes Altcoin investors should refer to when minimizing losses. We posit that, although mostly Cryptocurrency investors are believed as younger generation (Bohr & Bashir, 2014), they have has a strong speculative tendency (Pichet, 2017). While previous studies reveal user sentiments from social media and online communities affect to Bitcoin prices (Kinderis, Bezbradica, & Crane, 2018;Kristoufek, 2013;Rahman, Hemel, Anta, Al Muhee, & Uddin, 2018), the young investors are not simply affected by the emotional states of others, nor do they engage in panic peddling. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
In the face of escalating environmental concerns and rapid technological advancements, this research presents a timely exploration into developing competitive advantages within national Electric Vehicle (EV) supply chain systems. With the EV industry at the threshold of reshaping global transportation and energy consumption, understanding and optimizing the complex web of activities from raw material extraction to vehicle delivery is crucial for national economic and environmental strategies. This study introduces a novel conceptual framework for benchmarking national capabilities in the EV supply chain, incorporating mixed-methods research grounded in supply chain management, competitive strategy, and sustainability. By examining key factors for competitive advantage and conducting case studies with descriptive statistics on selected countries, this research aims to provide strategic insights for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and researchers. It underscores the importance of technological innovation, regulatory environments, and market dynamics in achieving a competitive edge in the global EV market. Ultimately, this study contributes to advancing the global shift towards sustainable transportation by offering a systematic approach for enhancing national competencies in the EV supply chain.
... Indeed, there is an increasing number of studies on its volatility dynamic (Catania et al., 2019;Katsiampa et al., 2019). To illustrate this fluctuation, in the early 2017, the price was one thousand dollars, reaching nearly twenty thousand dollars at the end of this year (Pichet, 2017). Moreover, in the past and also more recently, its price has been highly influenced by the statements and actions of institutions or influential figures. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
The financial markets experienced a thrilling saga between 2020 and 2023, characterised by a series of unprece-dented events and captivating dynamics that set the stage for a compelling exploration of the interaction be-tween bitcoin prices and the S&P 500 Index. This study systematically examines the correlation between bitcoin prices and the S&P 500 index using the Yahoo Finance dataset over a 48-month period. Using the exten-sive Yahoo Finance dataset and the analytical capabilities of R Statistics & R Studio, the present research covers a comprehensive period of 48 months (2020-2023). The study identifies a robust positive correlation, quanti-fied by a correlation coefficient of 0.7726, indicating a significant alignment between bitcoin price movements and the S&P 500 index. Monthly price variables obtained from an open-source repository provide a comprehen-sive overview of the relative dynamics of these financial assets. This analysis provides valuable insights into the current behaviour of bitcoin and the S&P 500 index, as well as concise observations on the dynamics of their correlation.
... Therefore, it is critical to discern between actual investment behavior and gambling-like behavioral addiction in the crypto investment business. Previous studies have reported that crypto investors are younger (Bohr & Bashir 2014), more optimistic about getting rich the easy way (Pezzani 2018), have a higher risk propensity (Conlon & McGee 2020), and have more fear of missing out (FOMO) (Pichet 2017) than other investors. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Cryptocurrencies are a popular investment tool today. However, some studies highlight the investing behavior of cryptocurrencies similar to pathological gambling. Investing behavior becomes risky when it is not based on proper and adequate analysis and carries the possibility of big losses as well as big gains. For this reason, we aimed to determine the potential risky investor profile by age, gender, personality traits and impulsivity levels. Subjects and methods: Six hundred and fifty-four cryptocurrencies investors (529 was male, 125 was female, their mean age was 35.6 ± 9.0) participated in this study between June 2022 - August 2022. Participants were administered the Sociodemographic Data Form, the South OAKS Gambling Screen Test - revised (SOGS-r), the Big Five Inventory (BFI-10), and Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11). Results: We found higher neuroticism and impulsivity in possible problematic crypto investors. In addition, extraversion, agreeableness and conscientiousness scores were lower. Additionally, in our regression analyzes we found that younger age and male gender predicted SOGS-r scores. After controlling for age and gender, extraversion negatively and motor impulsivity positively predicted SOGS-r scores. Discussion: Investing in cryptocurrencies can become a behavioral addiction, similar to pathological gambling. It is important to identify profiles in which investment behavior is risky. Conclusion: Personality traits and impulsivity may have a significant impact on identifying risky crypto investors and in the treatment process.
... Hershfield (2020) found that individual investors caused volatility in the prices of assets in the financial markets after acting with a sense of FoMO. Similarly, Pichet (2017) reported FoMO to be a driving force especially in extreme fluctuations in the cryptocurrency and other financial markets, and so the following hypothesis was developed, taking into account the results of related studies. Several studies of FoMO and involvement have been carried out in different fields (product, brand, social media, mobile phone, job, social network, sports team, etc.), and relationships between these two variables have been revealed (Eide et al. 2018;Kang, He, and Shin 2020;Brown et al. 2021). ...
Article
Little research has investigated the relationship between FoMO (fear of missing out) and financial behavior and underlying this association remains largely unknown. The aim of this paper is to investigate the relationship between envy and FoMO, investment involvement, investment engagement, and satisfaction. Proposed conceptual model was tested using structural equation modeling (SEM) among 1,741 individual investors. Research data were collected by convenience sampling method from individuals who are over 18 years of age and reported financial saving or individual investment. The inclusion criteria for participation included individuals over 18 years of age who reported financial saving or individual investment. Participants completed an online survey containing measurements regarding envy, FoMO, investment involvement, investment engagement, and satisfaction. The results indicated that there are significant and positive relationship between all of the constructs. This study highlights the underlying mechanism between FoMO and individual investment behavior, which has important theoretical and practical implications for understanding decision-making and behavior in the financial area.
... If used properly, it will provide a massive profit for a trader. However, traders still experience losses due to a lack of concentration when making transactions, are less ability to do market analysis, and Fear of Missing Out (Pichet, 2017). ...
Article
Full-text available
The study determines the relationship between demographic factors and personality traits with the performance of cryptocurrency traders. The research data is obtained from 100 cryptocurrency traders using the quota sampling method, correlational, with a quantitative approach. This study applies the Chi-square test to examine the relationship of demographic factors with performance and the Rank-Spearman test for the relationship of personality traits with performance. The results found that demographic characteristics (gender, age, length of trading) were positively associated with performance. Furthermore, personality traits (extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, openness to experience) have negative and insignificant influences on the performance of cryptocurrency traders.
... Literature shows numerous studies that have assessed the impacts of perceived risks on perceived usefulness [30] and individual's behavioral intention to adopt cryptocurrency [13,24,26,31], with varying results, but no one assessed the impact of perceived risks on perceived value from cryptocurrency. The following dimensions of perceived risks are incorporated in this study: instability [8,16,25,27,[32][33][34][35][36], operational risk [37], technical flaws [16], lack of regulation [8,13,20,[38][39][40][41], and security losses [13,27,39]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The goal of this study is to find out what people think about cryptocurrencies and how they feel about it. The study used a questionnaire to assess the factors that influence people’s willingness to accept cryptocurrency. The study used a pretest, posttest quantitative analysis to determine the level of awareness among users in the first phase. In the second step, information regarding the conceptual framework was gathered using a survey approach. For the study, 350 university students were chosen as the sample size. Hypotheses about the significant effects of perceived benefits, perceived risks, perceived value, and structural provisions on behavioral intention to adopt cryptocurrency were accepted, while hypotheses about social effects, moderating effect of self-efficacy and personal innovativeness as well as the mediator attitudes towards using cryptocurrency, were not statistically proven. The tested model and resultant findings have brought many managerial and theoretical implications for enhancing the intention to adopt cryptocurrency.
... Prevalence of FOMO in investors leads to a speculative bubble around the market. Evidently, the occurrence of FOMO is not restricted to equities, but it extends to investment in properties, bitcoin, etc., too (Pichet, 2017). ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose The study aims to understand the impact of loss aversion and herding on investment decision of retail investors. The study further evaluates the mediating role of fear of missing out (FOMO) in retail investors on these relationships. Design/methodology/approach The study employed questionnaire survey to collect data from retail investors of Indian stock market. Total 323 data were collected. The collected data were examined using SmartPLS. Factor analysis and partial least square structural equation modeling were employed for fulfilling the objectives of the study. Findings The results of the study revealed that investment decisions of retail investors are significantly influenced by loss aversion, herd behavior as well as FOMO. Assessing the impact of herd behavior and loss aversion on investment decision in presence and absence of FOMO exposed that FOMO partially mediates these relations. The mediation was complementary in nature as the presence of FOMO increased the influence of loss aversion and herd behavior on retail investor's investment decisions. Practical implications Behavioral predispositions are accountable for numerous irregularities in stock markets. Thus, it is quite substantial to realize the stimulus of these partialities on investment decisions. The outcomes of this study would help financial planners and investors to keep in mind the different ways their decision outcomes could be biased and try to ignore them. Originality/value Though there have been many studies conducted on behavioral biases and their impact on investment decisions, there are very few studies that have taken into account the FOMO factor in investment, in context of the behavioral biases. Theoretically, FOMO has been linked with herd behavior and greed of earning more, but there are very few empirical supports to this fact. Thus, this study is an attempt to fill this gap by examining the role of FOMO on investment decisions and the different biases associated with it.
Chapter
Full-text available
Döngüsel Ekonomi ve muhasebeye etkisi
Chapter
Full-text available
In this study Bitcoin that is defined as “a dangerous speculative bubble” by leading economists is examined from perspective of bubbles. At the end of empirical study existence of bubbles is proved. Nonetheless results also indicates that bubble formation characteristic of bitcoin alleviates starting from February2018.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.