ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Public administration and local government in particular, which also includes municipalities in individual countries, is in the context of the economic crisis a very topical and widely discussed issue. The management of municipalities is subject to increasing control by the public, the state and the municipalities themselves. The aim of the presented paper is to offer a comprehensive definition of efficiency and methods which allow to measure it. As results of our analysis can be mentioned overview of TOPSIS technique application in a several studies.
Content may be subject to copyright.
(online) = ISSN 2285 – 3642
ISSN-L = 2285 – 3642
Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People
Volume 7, Issue 1, 2018
Efficiency and inefficiency of public administration
Roman Vavrek
University of Prešov, Faculty of Management
Public administration and local government in particular, which also includes municipalities in individual
countries, is in the context of the economic crisis a very topical and widely discussed issue. The
management of municipalities is subject to increasing control by the public, the state and the municipalities
themselves. The aim of the presented paper is to offer a comprehensive definition of efficiency and
methods that allow measuring it. As results of our analysis can be mentioned overview of TOPSIS technique
application in a several studies.
efficiency, effectiveness, evaluation methods, TOPSIS technique
JEL Codes: H72, H75, C39, C50
If businesses want to survive and prosper in the public sector under the current global and competitive
environment, they have to change their way of thinking and managing. [23] see efficiency as a key problem
in the public sector. Efficiency means, according to [13], the most effective way of using its rare resources.
[11, 18, 20] see efficiency in a similar way. They consider it a state where the maximum amount of goods
and maximum benefit can be obtained from available resources. According to [23], efficiency is a state
where the economy is at the limit of its production possibilities.
One of the definitions is also offered by Act no. 502/2001 Coll. on the Financial Control, which describes
efficiency as "maximizing the results of actions related to the available public funds". Moreover, this law
describes efficiency as the most efficient use of public funds which aim is to achieve the highest possible
quality of fulfilled tasks while spending the lowest possible amount of funds.
Efficiency can be seen from three angles:
efficiency as an output - input, i.e. the relationship between revenues and expenditures, costs and
efficiency as the ratio of actual output to standards (norms),
efficiency as a success in fulfilling the intended goal.
[5] Points to the fact that there are two kinds of efficiency in the public sector:
internal, which represents the rational behavior of the subject and
(online) = ISSN 2285 – 3642
ISSN-L = 2285 – 3642
Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People
Volume 7, Issue 1, 2018
external, defined by the quality of services and its external actions.
[9] points to the relationship between efficiency with equality/righteousness. Any change aimed at
enhancing equality in society is associated with a certain loss of efficiency, primarily because of the
state intervention is always associated with certain costs (administrative, transactional),
redistribution of resources causes demotivating tendencies.
According to [23], there must always be a certain compromise between efficiency and righteousness.
Excessive preference for efficiency leads to social instability in society; on the other hand, too much
emphasis on righteousness slows down the economic growth and development. Another view of this issue
offers [1, 4, 8].
The relationship between efficiency and effectiveness
According to [20], effectiveness means the use of public funds in such a way that ensures the optimum
level of achieved objectives. [11] see effectiveness as a degree to which the set objectives are met when
the results of the expenditure activity are compared with the objectives in relation to the resources needed
to achieve the objectives. According to Act no. 502/2001 Coll. (Section 2) effectiveness is the "relationship
between the planned result of the activity and the actual result of the activity in terms of the public funds
used". [14] sees the effectiveness as the higher performance measurement criterion. Despite the high
efficiency of processes, however, their outputs may be pointless and therefore useless. A key role in
determining and measuring effectiveness has the objectives that represent the expected future states
(outcomes). After realization, the role of feedback is to ascertain how many goals have been met.
Fig. 1: The issue of effectiveness
Effectiveness indicators illustrate the relationship between services/products and the resources needed
to produce them. Efficiency indicators show the quality of the action taken or the degree of fulfillment of
the set objectives. One option is to measure timeliness and satisfaction rate of citizens (clients).
Productivity indicators combine efficiency and effectiveness in one indicator. Another view of efficiency
offers [6, 7] too. [19] illustrate the relationship between efficiency and effectiveness, as follows:
(online) = ISSN 2285 – 3642
ISSN-L = 2285 – 3642
Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People
Volume 7, Issue 1, 2018
Fig. 2: Relationship between efficiency and effectiveness
Inefficiency of public administration
Public sector efficiency in the strict sense of the word, according to [18], is seen as a result of the
relationship between inputs and outputs. According to [3], it is based on two conditions – Pareto efficiency
and the individual efficiency associated with the creation of specific public goods. However, the tendency
towards inefficiency is considered the main problem from the long-term point of view:
the effort to maximize inputs of organizations,
absence of intense pressure to reduce the costs,
stagnation of outputs/minimizing organizational outputs.
According to [23], there is a tendency for inefficiency in the public sector due to the following reasons:
no conditions for proper competition,
there is no specific owner,
no profit pressure,
there is no risk of bankruptcy,
public sector inputs can be easy to quantify, while outputs (benefits) are difficult to quantify,
f) inputs are purchased at market prices and outputs are provided free of charge (at a tax price) or
at a modified price (user fee),
public sector activities are demanding in terms of professional competence.
[23] distinguishes between allocation and production inefficiency. Allocation inefficiency arises if the
option chosen is incorrect or less effective than other variants. Productive inefficiency (technical) arises in
the production of public goods when a worse path is chosen to achieve the stated goal.
Act no. 523/2004 Coll. on the Financial Rules of the Public Administration considers inefficient,
uneconomic and ineffective spending of public funds to be financial discipline violation, while Act no.
502/2001 Coll. regulates the definition of the term efficiency, effectiveness and economic efficiency. Act
320/2001 Coll. on Financial Control regulates the effectiveness, efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the use
of public funds by the public administration in the Czech Republic.
The efficiency of the public sector depends on its size and structure. According to [21], external factors
affecting the size and structure of the public sector are as follows:
political structure of society and the associated public elections and public scrutiny,
the functioning of the market system - the taxpayer creates an atmosphere of efficiency through
the amount of generated tax revenues thus regulating the financing of public services,
the competitive environment within the public sector created by the public administration,
(online) = ISSN 2285 – 3642
ISSN-L = 2285 – 3642
Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People
Volume 7, Issue 1, 2018
financing of sectors and organizations of the public sector based on their performance and benefits
they provide.
According to [16] the internal factors include:
science and technology (use of knowledge from selected areas),
structure of public activities in the organization (primary, secondary and management),
all forms of labor division (horizontal and vertical),
qualification of workers,
workers' initiative (including ethics),
the management system as the major factor of efficiency.
Methods of efficiency evaluation
Literature outlines several options to measure efficiency in the public administration. [19, 20, 21, 23,
32] and others focus either on individual methods or group of methods. This chapter contains a list of
individual efficiency measurement methods and a brief description of them. The breakdown follows the
complexity of the methods used and identifies five categories of methods:
evaluation methods based on one criterion,
assessment methods based on a number of criteria,
comparative methods,
management evaluation methods,
other selected evaluation methods.
In addition to the above-mentioned methods and practices, it is possible to increase the quality and
efficiency of processes at the municipal level through competition, improved budget management and
public scrutiny. [19]
Evaluation methods based on one criterion
The methods are based on one selected criterion (indicator). These methods are therefore easy to
implement, however, they are the most distorted. These methods can be broken down:
into financial indicators, e.g. net present value, internal rate of return, profitability index, payback
time, profitability index, pay back, etc.,
into “input-output” methods e.g. cost minimizing analysis (CMA), cost-benefit analysis (CBA), cost-
effectiveness analysis (CEA), cost-utility analysis (CUA).
These methods were created for the purposes of the private sector, i.e. businesses. However, their
modifications can also be used to evaluate public sector efficiency.
Financial ratios (also referred to as investment rating methods) are dynamic and static, depending on
whether calculations take into account time perspective.
(online) = ISSN 2285 – 3642
ISSN-L = 2285 – 3642
Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People
Volume 7, Issue 1, 2018
The common characteristic of input-output methods is the measurement of costs that were done in
monetary units. The difference between them depends on how outputs are measured.
Method Output measurement
CMA is not measured
CBA monetary units
CEA number of output units
CUA project’s benefits
Table 1: Comparison of outputs of “input-output” methods
Evaluation methods based on multiple criteria
Efficiency evaluation based on multiple criteria is a more complicated option, but on the other hand,
this evaluation gives more insight into the real state of public sector efficiency. According to [20] the basic
advantage of these methods is the fact that they are not in a position to transform non-economic criteria
into economic criteria at the cost of delicate, sometimes controversial operations. These methods include:
scales and ranges (can be used separately or as a part of another method),
methods of weight determination (equal importance, ranking, Fuller’s method, Saaty's method),
methods based on partial evaluation of variants (weighted sum method, basic variant),
methods based on pair wise comparison of variants (lexicographic method, AHP, TOPSIS).
The method of equal importance is not able to distinguish between the greater or lesser importance of
the observed criteria, i.e., each criterion is evaluated equally. Ranking is based on assigning a point value
based on certain preferences. The scoring method is similar to the previous method, but works with
cardinal variables (preference of individual indicators). The principle of the Fuller’s method is to allocate the
points to each pair of indicators and then to sum up the points obtained. [25, 26, 27,28] used this method
to evaluate municipalities in the Slovak Republic. Saaty's method works much like the previous methods.
The only difference is that it also determines the size of this preference. The weighted sum method is
particularly suited to determine quantitative criteria, assuming a linear dependence of the utility rate on
criteria (indicators). The basic variant method determines the best or desired values and then calculates the
utility rate of each alternative.
The lexicographic method is based on the assumption that the most important criterion has the
greatest influence. In the case of compliance, the second and the next criterion shall be taken into account.
When solving a problem the AHP method takes into consideration all the elements that affect the outcome
(the links between them and the intensity with which they influence each other). The TOPSIS method
chooses the variant that is closest to the pre-set ideal and at the same time the furthest from the basal
(online) = ISSN 2285 – 3642
ISSN-L = 2285 – 3642
Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People
Volume 7, Issue 1, 2018
Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution
According to [22], TOPSIS enables the decision maker to solve and analyze the problem, to compare
alternatives and to rank them based on selected criteria. At the same time, this method is considered the
most direct method of MCDM, while according to [17] this method is the most appropriate decision-making
tool when it comes to incomplete data. According to [12, 22], the range of selected data is not determinant
for its use, i.e. it is possible to use data of any range.
The perception of the advantages and disadvantages of this method differs due to their use in different
situations and contexts. When comparing with other relevant methods (AHP, ELECTRE), [22] outline the
following advantages of the TOPSIS method: the logic representing the rationality of human choice, the
general value taking into account the best and worst values of the criteria, simple calculation which can be
easily programmed or the result of alternatives can be illustrated by polyhedron (min. in 2 dimensions). [2]
also add the following:
easy use,
the ability to work with all types of criteria (subjective and objective),
rationality and understanding,
the directness of the calculation,
the concept illustrates the best alternative through mathematical calculations.
Since TOPSIS, as the MADM/MCDM method, is a practical tool for selecting and generating a number of
alternatives, its application under different conditions varies. [15, 16] TOPSIS is used as the main decision
maker in the "Asia Pacific Area". Its use was identified in manufactories, financial investment, sports teams’
evaluation, automated processes. The method was also used to compare the performance of multiple
companies and as a financial index for performance evaluation in a specific area that allowed detailed
Efficiency or inefficiency of public administration is a current issue in many countries and at many
levels. We could find a several alternatives how to measure it. TOPSIS method has been chosen for its
above-mentioned attributes and advantages. We used this method to evaluate municipalities in the Slovak
Republic with interesting findings:
In Prešov district the municipal size and classified by TOPSIS technique is not a link. Modified
weights had an impact on the ranking each year. In order for the whole period 2010 - 2012 these
differences were minimal. [24]
On the sample of municipalities from the Prešov Self-Governing Region (661 municipalities), the
TOPSIS technique is applied in the first stage on the level of individual districts, followed by the
application on the level of the whole region. The change of the sample file resulted in the change of
the rankings of evaluated municipalities. Because of results identified above, we are inclined to the
evaluation of municipalities in larger units (regions) that, according to us better describe their
economy and offer a larger space for comparison or further evaluation. [30]
By applying of the TOPSIS technique in Prešov self-governing region (661 municipalities), we
(online) = ISSN 2285 – 3642
ISSN-L = 2285 – 3642
Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People
Volume 7, Issue 1, 2018
concluded that the weights themselves of selected criteria do not represent a factor that would
significantly affect the overall evaluation of entities (municipalities). [31]
The common sign for its application in districts of Bardejov, Prešov and Vranov nad Topľou is an
imbalance of municipalities’ economy or the high variation margin of results that is to a certain
extent compensated through the evaluation in a time period longer than one year. Municipalities in
these districts exhibit the same fixed linking to selected criteria (expect of Vranov nad Topľou
district in three criteria). [28]
We consider the TOPSIS method to be a suitable multi-criterion assessment tool for the use of which it
is necessary to have financial indicators (which in some cases may limit its use). Using it is also conditioned
by the appropriate selection of the monitored indicators and their weighting, which significantly
determines the overall results.
This article was elaborated as a part of grants VEGA 1/0578/18, KEGA 038PU-4/2018 and VEGA
[1] ADAMIŠIN, P. and E. HUTTMANOVÁ, 2013. The analysis of the energy intensity of economies by selected
indicators of sustainability (Rio+ 20). In: Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People. Issue 2, no.
1, pp. 7-18. ISSN 2285-3642.
[2] BHUTIA, P. W. and R. PHIPON, 2012. Application of AHP and TOPSIS Method for Supplier Selection Problem. In:
Journal of Engineering. Issue 2, no. 10. pp. 43-50. ISSN 2278-8719.
[3] CIBÁKOVÁ, V. and V. NINÁČOVÁ, 2006. Základy ekonomiky verejného sektora. Bratislava: Merkury. ISBN 80-
[4] DUBRAVSKÁ, M., 2014. Recycling of the MSW in the Slovak Republic. In: Journal of Economic Development,
Environment and People. Issue 3, no. 3, pp. 66-71. ISSN 2285-3642.
[5] FANTOVÁ ŠUMPÍKOVÁ, M., 2006. Hodnocení efektivnosti veřejných výdajových programů: habilitačná práca.
Brno: Masaryk university.
[6] FRIDGEIRSSON, T., V., 2015. Benchmarking, planning and decision making procedures in public projects. In:
Journal of Global Strategic Management. Issue 9, no. 2, pp. 5-14. ISSN 1307-6205.
[7] CHAUDHARY, G. M. and Z. ABBAS, 2017. Global Financial Crisis And Its Impact On Efficiency And Performance Of
Commercial Banks In Pakistan. In: Journal of Business Studies Quarterly. Issue 8, no. 4, pp. 15-29. ISSN 2152-1034.
[8] CHOVANCOVÁ, J. and H. HARAUSOVÁ, 2013. Education of the next generation of managers in context of green
economy. In: Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People. Issue 2, no. 1, pp. 57-68. ISSN 2285-
[9] HALÁSEK, D. et al., 2004. Rozhodování ve veřejném sektoru. 1. edit. Ostrava: VŠB – Technická univerzita Ostrava.
ISBN 80-248-0570-7.
[10] HALÁSEK, D., J. PILNÝ and P. TOMÁNEK, 2002. Určování bonity obcí. Ostrava: VŠB – Technická univerzita Ostrava.
ISBN 80-248-0159-0.
(online) = ISSN 2285 – 3642
ISSN-L = 2285 – 3642
Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People
Volume 7, Issue 1, 2018
[11] HAMERNÍKOVÁ, B. and A. MAAYTOVÁ et al., 2010. Veřejné finance. 2. edit. Prague: Wolters Kluwer ČR. ISBN 978-
[12] KANDAKOGLU, A., M. CELIK and I. AKGUN, 2009. A multi-methodological approach for shipping registry selection
in maritime transportation industry. In: Mathematical and Computer Modelling. Issue 2009, no. 49, pp. 586-597.
ISSN 0895-7177.
[13] MANKIW, N., 2000. Zásady ekonomie. 2. edit. Prague: Grada. ISBN 80-71698-91-1.
[14] OCHRANA, F., 2003. Veřejná volba a řízení veřejných výdav.1. edit. Prague: Ekopress. ISBN 80-86119-71-8.
[15] OSTASI, B., ONAR, B. S. and C. KAHRAMAN, 2017. Selection among innovative project proposals using a hesitant
fuzzy multiple criteria decision making method. In: Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting, Issue 2, no. 4,
pp. 192-200. ISSN 2148-6697.
[16] OZEN, E., YESILDAG, E. and M. SOBA, 2015. TOPSIS performance evaluation measures and relation between
financial ratios and stock returns. In: Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting, Issue 4, no. 2, pp. 482-500.
ISSN 2148-6697.
[17] PAVIC, Z. and V. NOVOSELAC, 2013. Notes on TOPSIS Method. In: International Journal of Research in Engineering
and Science. Issue 1, no. 2. pp. 5-12. ISSN 2320-9356.
[18] PEKOVÁ, J., 2011. Finance územní samosprávy: teorie a prax v ČR. 1. edit. Prague: Wolters Kluwer ČR. ISBN 978-
[19] PROVAZNÍKOVÁ, R., 2009. Financování měst, obcí a regionů: teorie a praxe. 2 edit. Prague: GRADA Publishing.
ISBN 978-80-247-2789-9.
[20] REKTOŘÍK, J., J. ŠELEŠOVSKÝ et al., 2003. Kontrolní systémy veřejné správy a veřejného sektoru. 1. edit. Prague:
Ekopress. ISBN 80-86119-72-6.
[21] ŠEBESTOVÁ, J., 2008. Kontrolní systém veřejné správy a veřejného sektoru. Karviná: Silesion university in Opava.
ISBN 978-80-7248-460-7.
[22] SHIH, H., H. SHYUR and E.S. LEE, 2007. An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. In: Mathematical and
Computer Modelling. Issue 2007, no. 45, pp. 801-813. ISSN 0895-7177.
[23] TETŘEVOVÁ, L., 2008. Veřejná ekonomie. 1. edit. Příbram: PBtisk Příbram. ISBN 978-80-86946-79-5.
[24] VAVREK, R. and P. ADAMIŠIN, 2013. Impact of weight indicators of TOPSIS technique in the selected district in
the Slovak Republic. In: Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People. Issue 2, no. 4, pp. 61-73.
ISSN 2285-3642.
[25] VAVREK, R., 2017. Multi-criteria evaluation of municipalities. Warsawa: Jedność w róznorodości, 142 s. - ISBN
[26] VAVREK, R., 2017. Váha parametru TOPSIS techniky a jeho vplyv na hodnotenie obcí v Slovenskej republike. In:
Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice. Issue 14, no. 39, pp. 236-246. ISSN 1211-555X.
[27] VAVREK, R., KRAVČÁKOVÁ VOZÁROVÁ, I., CEHLÁROVÁ, M. and I. ONDRIJOVÁ, 2014. The municipality as a source
of information? In: Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People. Issue 3, no. 3, pp. 41-48. ISSN
[28] VAVREK, R., P. ADAMIŠIN and R. KOTULIČ, 2017. Multi-criteria evaluation of municipalities in Slovakia - case
study in selected districts. In: Polish Journal of Management Studies. Issue 16, no. 2, pp. 290-301. ISSN 2081-
[29] VAVREK, R., R. KOTULIČ and P. ADAMIŠIN, 2014. TOPSIS Method and Its Application to the Local Self-Government
of the Slovak Republic. In: Journal of Applied Economic Sciences. Issue 3, no. 3, pp. 504-512. ISSN 1843-6110.
(online) = ISSN 2285 – 3642
ISSN-L = 2285 – 3642
Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People
Volume 7, Issue 1, 2018
[30] VAVREK, R., R. KOTULIČ and P. ADAMIŠIN, 2015. District as a Determinant of the Evaluation of Municipalities
Economy?. In: Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics. Issue 53, no. 3, pp. 12. ISSN 0973-1377.
[31] VAVREK, R., R. KOTULIČ and P. ADAMIŠIN, 2015. Evaluation of Municipalities Management with the TOPSIS
Technique Emphasising on the Impact of Weights of Established Criteria. In: Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-
Government. Issue 13, no. 2, pp. 249-264. ISSN 1581-5374.
[32] VRABKOVÁ, I., 2012. Perspektivy řízení kvality ve veřejné správě. Ostrava: VŠB Technická univerzita Ostrava.
ISBN 978-80-248-2939-5.
... Generally, in an organisation, the efficiency of operations is a result of the maximisation of resources and achieving optimal outputs. However, public administration suffers from inefficient production because of monopolistic practices and the social service imperative that results in poor measurements of outputs (Mihaiu, 2010;Vavrek, 2018). The management and decision-making field is progressively improving the ways of measuring government services (Lovell, 1994). ...
Full-text available
This study focusses on the efficiencies of subunits of South Africa’s Metrorail services. Over the period 2015/16 to 2018/19 Metrorail implemented its corporate plan to improve operations efficiency. This study applies the Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI) to compare the performance efficiency of the three Metrorail subunits over the study period. The results indicate the variation of productivity levels amongst Metrorail subunits. Furthermore, output-oriented scale efficiency scores are used to measure the optimal scale situation of each Metrorail subunit. It is concluded that largely the KwaZulu-Natal subunit seems to be more efficient when compared to the other two subunits over the full period under analysis. Therefore, in the cognition of the relatively large size of the Gauteng and Western Cape subunits and their concomitant inefficiency levels, the findings suggest that Metrorail management should focus on correcting their inefficiencies while also considering alteration of their size to optimize production.
... The tax system reform in Slovak Republic is part of a comprehensive tax and tax reform in the Slovak Republic. The tax reform should contribute to improving public finances, but its progress has been slowed down by many problems (Jakubek, Tej, 2015;Vavrek, 2018). According to Andrejovská, Hudáková (2016) taxes are an integral part of human society, regardless of the economic, cultural and political disparities between the countries. ...
Full-text available
Conference Paper
Incomes from real estate tax represent part of incomes from municipal taxes and fees. These incomes represent an important source of funding for local self-government. Local taxes seek to ensure the fiscal interest of municipalities and through them municipalities can achieve their set aims. The aim of the paper is to evaluate and compare the incomes from real estate tax on the example of Slovak and Czech Republic in the period of 2009 - 2017. As a base we used the data from the evaluation of the results of budget management of municipalities and higher territorial units in the Slovak Republic, state final account of territorial budgets of the Czech Republic and data from the Slovak and Czech Statistical Office. From the results of the analysis, it turned out that while the share of incomes from real estate tax on the whole municipal tax incomes at the level of Slovak municipalities is on average 16%, at the level of Czech municipalities it is 6%. The share of the incomes from real estate tax on the current incomes of Slovak municipalities is on average 9%, while at the Czech level is on average of 4%.
Full-text available
This paper focuses on assessing the relationship between accrual accounting practice and financial performance in local governments in Cameroon. Using accountability and efficiency as performance proxies, the study employs a mix of qualitative and quantitative research approaches with a triangulate method of data collection. In a population of 374 councils, 50 councils were sampled and clustered according to their statutory council categories. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used with a multiple regression analysis on panel data to test the relationship between accrual accounting practice and financial performance within council categories. The findings revealed that about 77% of councils (predominantly rural councils) practicing mild accrual accounting scored a higher financial performance. Meanwhile, 23% of councils (mostly city councils) practicing a moderate and sometimes strong accrual accounting had a lower financial performance. The pooled regression analysis showed a 13 % insignificant but positive correlation between financial performance and accrual accounting practice. These findings where then backed up with inferences drawn from interviews, discussions as well as content study of accounting books. It revealed that councils have the latitude to navigate from mild, moderate, and strong accrual accounting practice as the need arose. Accrual accounting practice should be sequenced in ways that councils can focus on mild accrual accounting practice, and it should move to a higher level of moderate and full accrual accounting only when they can afford the expertise and infrastructural resources needed to yield a significant performance result.
Full-text available
The article analyzes the main performance indicators of the public authorities and governance bodies in Russia as well as reveals significant problems inherent in the Russian system of public administration. The purpose of the work is to assess the performance of the Russian public authorities and governance bodies based on statistical data. Method or methodology of work: general scientific methods, techniques of scientific abstraction, observation and systemic research. Results. Performance assessment of the public authorities and governance bodies reveals the fact that the bureaucracy in Russia is rather large and its functioning involves high expenditures. The e-government system is still far from being highly developed, which makes it difficult to fully implement online coordination of government structures with both the business sector and households. An analysis of the indicators of the population's living standards shows rather low real income levels and a significant social stratification of Russian society, which negatively characterizes the functioning of the public administration system. Practical implications. The results of the study can be used by the Russian public authorities and governance bodies to develop criteria aimed at increasing their performance level and the standard of living of the country's population, as well as by researchers studying the problems in this area.
Статья посвящена подходам и критериям оценки эффективности исполнительной власти в регионах России на примере республик Северо-Кавказского федерального округа. Они часто фигурируют в числе отстающих, дотационных субъектов РФ, с относительно низким уровнем производства, высокой рождаемостью, высоким уровнем безработицы и другими социально-экономическими вызовами для государственного управления. В статье рассматриваются теоретические подходы к эффективности власти: 1) с позиции выполнения правительством социальных функций; 2) с позиции системного подхода через анализ взаимосвязи требований общества, поступающих в систему на “входе”, и принятыми властью решениями “на выходе”; 3) с точки зрения качества государственных и правовых институтов, которые способствуют эффективности управления. Программно-целевой подход и цифровизация экономики ставят новые задачи повышения качества управления и предоставления государственных услуг, провоцируют изменение нормативной базы. В данной работе разбирается перечень показателей деятельности органов исполнительной власти в субъектах РФ, введенный Указом Президента России в апреле 2019 г. Проводя сравнение новых показателей с предыдущей системой индикаторов, автор на основе данных социально-экономической статистки республик СКФО анализирует их релевантность для оценки качества управления в регионе. Особое внимание уделяется показателю “доверие к власти”, который заменил прежние индикаторы социальной удовлетворенности населения. Предлагаются пути оптимизации методики измерения эффективности власти с учетом региональной специфики.
Full-text available
Conference Paper
The High Territorial Unit (HTU) is represent the regional self – government level in Slovak Republic. HTU is a legal entity, which, under the conditions laid down by law, manages its own property, own incomes, secures, and protects the rights and interests of its inhabitants. In practice, this means that HTUs may dispose of their property under Act No. 466/2001 Coll. on property of Higher Territorial Units in the same way as legal entities in the private sector. Thus, HTUs can earn part of their incomes from entrepreneurship with their property and create a competitive environment for other businesses. However, unlike the private sector, where the majority of the property are used to generate profits, the majority of property of regional self-government are primarily used to provide both original and transferred competences, and property that are not used for this purpose can be used for commercial purposes. The aim of the paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of property of HTUs through the analysis of incomes from property business and ownership in the period 2002-2017. Analysis of selected indicators of financial management of municipalities relating to the use of property of HTUs. In addition, based on selected indicators, we will also analyse the share of these incomes on the total income of the HTUs as well as on the non-tax incomes. The basis for the analysis was the cumulative data from HTUs in the Slovak Republic, which is present by the Ministry of Finance of the Slovak Republic. The analysis revealed the fact that the incomes from the use of property of HTUs are low, despite the fact that HTUs also have property in its portfolio that are not used to provide competencies so can be used for commercial purposes. However, the analysis of selected indicators showed that HTU could not generate such incomes from property that would be sufficient for the operation of HTU. In order to increase these incomes, it would be appropriate to examine the overall structure of the property and its use. Practical implications: The results obtained during the evaluation period can help HTU to identify reserves in the use of its property. This low-income rate points to the fact that the HTUs are unable to fully using the potential of their property and, despite fiscal decentralization, are still dependent on the tax incomes, which they receive from the state budget. The results of the analysis form the basis for the creation of strategic documents focusing on HTU property policy.
Full-text available
In the Slovak Republic, the economy of the municipality is governed by the law that considers the indebtedness of the municipality (share of foreign resources on assets) as the main criterion. The aim of this article is to propose an alternative to the legal perspective on the evaluation of municipalities in the Slovak Republic. The article describes the TOPSIS technique as a possibly suitable alternative for the complex evaluation of municipalities’ economy in selected countries. On the sample of 91 municipalities in Presov district, 85 municipalities in Bardejov district and 68 municipalities in Vranov nad Toplou district the TOPSIS method is applied on the basis of 8 previously set criteria. Results of the application are further studied in order to identify correlations between the result and criteria studied as well as the identification of differences (similarities) in the economy of municipalities in reference districts. As results of our analysis can be mentioned imbalance of municipalities’ economy in each district, high variation margin of results achieved or fact that municipalities exhibit the same fixed linking to selected criteria. © 2017, Czestochowa University of Technology. All rights reserved.
Full-text available
The purpose of multicriteria decision models is to help decision maker to evaluate each alternative and to rank them in descending order of performance. This study analyses the concept of Multiple Attribute Decision Making for using in local government area. The aim of this paper is to analyse the concept of Multiple Attribute Decision Making for selecting the most efficient municipality in selected district in the Slovak Republic. Achieving this purpose, TOPSIS technique (in two variants) is used as decision making tools.
Full-text available
This paper deals with the issue of education for sustainable development of the generation of future managers in the context of the green economy. The paper analyses the need for environmental education of graduates in theoretical way who are expected to act as executives and in positions which are defined as Green Enhanced Skills Occupations or shortly Green Jobs and who should be able to apply the tools of environmental protection in a business sector, municipalities or third sector. The essential part of the article presents the partial results of the research, which was focused on finding whether students of economic universities are aware of issue of sustainable development and environmental policy tools, which can help the implementation of green economy in the practice and whether this issue is taught at universities. At the end of the article authors point out the important role of universities in preparing the future managers to work in the green economy.
Full-text available
The municipality as an entity of the local government and disposes defined rights and obligations, which are governed by the special regulations. In accordance with Act no. 211/2000 Coll. on free access to information, the municipality is mandatory publish and make available information that this Act also more specify. This paper focuses on availability of information from websites or other available sources. The basic set was represented by 91 municipalities of Prešov district, in which were surveyed a total of 75 data (6 identification and 69 financial). Within the implemented questioning, we can conclude especially the availability of identification data, for which there are multiple sources (eg. number of inhabitants). Overall, however, the municipalities did not provide the requested information, when up to 27 municipalities did not provide more than 5 data (including 3 identification). One of the outcomes is also a proving of small correlation between the volume of data obtained from the municipality and the number of its inhabitants, respectively the distance from the district town.
Full-text available
The paper demonstrates the application of TOPSIS method using two selected examples. In the first example, it is shown that the best TOPSIS solution is neither closest to the positive ideal solution nor the farthest from the negative ideal solution. In many works on TOPSIS method stands as follows: "The basic principle is that the chosen alternative should have the shortest distance from the positive ideal solution and the longest distance from the negative ideal solution".
The Paper aims at recycling of the MSW in the condition of Slovak Republic. Waste management is facing big criticism in Slovakia. It is one of the environmental policies that is written in political strategies but not taken seriously. Environmental policy has not been given any priority in the government for many years. The changes came together with EU membership. Standard scientific research methods included synthesis, analysis and comparative method
The aim of this paper is to analyze the status and the development of energy intensity in selected countries of Central and South-eastern Europe. Reducing of energy consumption is one of the ways to ensure not only economic, but also environmental aspects of sustainability.This paper describes the relationship between economic development and energy intensity of countries, particularly the countries of the selected region.