Many constructs in psychological science are highly abstract and considered sources of uncertainty in published research findings, which has yielded dissatisfaction as manifested in two seemingly opposing trends. First, many researchers have moved away from constructs toward specific observables and effects. Second, others have moved toward constructs, calling for sharper definitions and improved measurement. Both treat uncertainty as something to reduce. We believe that uncertainties reflect the essential complex reality of psychological phenomena. From this perspective, psychological constructs should be reformulated to better accommodate and explain psychological phenomena-including their essential complexity and uncertainties. We first describe common approaches to defining and measuring psychological constructs, and briefly discuss their history and epistemology. We then formulate construct desiderata, and we propose a reformulation of constructs as (1) composite in nature, to allow for heterogeneous content (represented as an area), versus unitary, to reflect a sharp definition and absence of heterogeneity (represented as a point), (2) organized in hierarchical systems with overlap, and (3) variable in nature as reflected in variable measurements. This reformulation is more consistent with observed variability of findings, which aligns with ongoing and newer methodological avenues that emphasize generalization efforts while preserving and facilitating the integrative and explanatory role of constructs. We close by considerations for further discussion and debate. 3 Questioning Psychological Constructs: Current Issues and Proposed Changes The notion of constructs is fundamental to theory and research in psychology and its allied disciplines. Constructs are defined operationally in empirical studies and findings are interpreted in terms of constructs. Despite the fundamental role constructs serve in research, the notion of constructs has received minimal attention in the bulk of contemporary literature. Slaney's (2017) discussion is an exception. We observe a silent trend in much of the literature characterized by moving away from constructs in psychological science with little explicit criticism of their value. This move away implies a downscaling of constructs favoring observables and notions closer to observables over unobservable abstract constructs. Those moving away from constructs seek greater specificity by staying closer to observables (e.g., Borsboom et al., 2021) and specific effects (Open Science Collaboration, 2015). This trend arises from dissatisfactions with the vagueness of constructs, variable results, lack of progress in accumulating knowledge, and numerous calls for direct rather than conceptual replications in addressing failures to replicate. Conversely, in some corners of the literature, explicit calls to move toward upscaling operational definitions (ODs) for better measurement of constructs have appeared. Most of these calls for better measurement acknowledge the problems noted above, and inspired by dissatisfactions with these problems, they recommend tightened definitions of constructs and improved measurement (e.g., Flake & Fried, 2020). Our position is neither of the two. We accept the issues outlined above as sensible reflections of uncertainty in psychological science-an essential feature of most psychological phenomena, mainly due to various types of complexities of human behavior. In response, and for the sake of discussion, we are setting up a controversy. What is to blame for these issues, the research practices or reality? We choose the latter and call for an approach and methods that accord with this reality. Koch (1992) explains that dissatisfactions are inherent to studying a complex reality, that the frustrations repeat from time-to-time in psychological science and are followed by efforts to improve methods and to define univocal concepts. Rather than directly acting on the frustrations we believe that construct abstractness and related heterogeneity of content reflect the true complexity of psychological phenomena that leads to the frustration, and that accepting complexity-based uncertainty and devising