“There is a growing awareness of the significance of affective learning outcomes as a
central pedagogical concern among physical education teachers, but also an acknowledgement that teachers may have limited skills and resources to facilitate affective learning” (Kirk, 2020, cited by Teraoka et al., 2021, p. 460).
Despite the popularity of game-based approaches across the Atlantic, it does not seem to have filled a gap in the scientific literature concerning the notion of 'engaging formats' in physical education. The ambition of this habilitation is to articulate, around the 'Constraints-Led-Approach' (CLA) paradigm, the theoretical frameworks of situational interest (SI), motor praxeology (PM) and the conative approach (CA), in order to create ‘affective learning design’ in which the teacher becomes the 'designer' of emotionally significant experiences for students.
CLA and game theories are epistemologically compatible, which is often the poor relation of 'mixed' approaches. On the one hand, they are holistic approaches based on the perception-action coupling and the actor-environment symmetry. On the other hand, they are hedonistic conceptions insofar as they give a central place to emotions in adaptation processes. They thus share a bottom-up logic of interpreting behavior in situations and aim to design learning environments that are both adapted and rich in new possibilities, guiding each learner towards active exploration of their environment. CLA, PM and CA can be used in an integrated and complementary manner to explore the effectiveness of pedagogical designs in PE. While CA provides a classification of organismic constraint and PM a system for categorizing the games used, CLA provides a sound theoretical explanation of how task and environmental factors interact with personal factors to shape both the physical and psychological engagement of practitioners.
Our work as part of this habilitation highlights: a) that practitioners can declare the same pleasure in a variety of formats while engaging in them differently from a physical point of view; b) that studying these phenomena requires us to look at the effects of interactions, as variables linked to expertise and gender modify the effect of certain formats (this calls for a twofold vigilance with regard to declarative measures and the myth of the ideal format for an epistemic student); and c) that there are also important inducers not directly linked to game formats that need to be analyzed over the medium and long term, particularly after major life transitions.
Studying engagement is therefore eminently complex and requires above all focusing on the effects of engagement in order to uncover the individual-environment interactions that set the subject in motion (and interest). This research option cannot be carried out a priori by focusing on the presupposed effects of the proposed formats and/or a posteriori by focusing on the subjectivity of the experience recounted by the actor, but rather in situ by recording the action in context. This objectification of the effects of interactions or ‘ergo-conative consonances’ is therefore a central condition for attesting to the relevance of the format in terms of engagement. Finally, as for the teaching method used: "the only good format is the one that matches the specific interests of the students".
This work, rooted in the ecological paradigm, to study the commitment of practitioners ‘from within’, requires a rapprochement between scientists and practitioners. By opening the doors of the gymnasium to the researcher, the PE teacher gives him/her access to the analysis of behaviors in situation. In return, the researcher's updating of the eco-engaging variables enables the teacher to develop real pedagogical content knowledge and thus rehabilitate non-interventionist pedagogies in PE. On the basis of this knowledge, teachers can switch from simply prescribing tasks, which often demotivate pupils, to co-designing an 'engaging' experiential design in PE. In this type of research project, the role of practitioners is therefore more important than ever, and if this could be the message of this habilitation, it would summarize my own career quite well, first as a badminton player, then as a coach, teacher-trainer and finally as a teacher-researcher.