This dissertation explores the phenomenon of multiple religious belonging, the phenomenon of people in Western countries who combine elements from multiple religious traditions, as it has come to be known in theological scholarship. This phenomenon can be conceptually distinguished in three types: hard multiple religious belonging, medium multiple religious belonging and soft multiple religious belonging. The first refers to individuals who identify with two religious traditions. The second refers to individuals who identify with only one religious tradition, but also engage in practices from other religious traditions. The third refers to individuals who do not identify with any religious tradition in particular, but practice religion transversally.
The research question is formulated as follows: How does the phenomenon of multiple religious belonging challenge existing interpretations of religious belonging and religious diversity, what are the historical backgrounds of these existing interpretations, and how can an cross-cultural comparison with Chinese approaches to religious belonging and religious diversity lead to a new hermeneutic of religious belonging and religious diversity that allows a fruitful engagement with multiple religious belonging?
In the first chapter I discuss the history and the discourse of “multiple religious belonging” as it has developed in theology. I analyse that in theology two positions are most commonly expressed in favour of multiple religious belonging: a particularistic position, which emphasis the own religious tradition in engaging with multiplicity, and a particularistic positions, which emphasizes the equality of religious traditions and looks at it from a perspective outside any particular tradition. I also discuss cognate phenomena in social sciences; though not called “multiple religious belonging”, religious hybridity is also a widely studied phenomenon in social sciences.
I conclude that there are two hermeneutics running next to each other: a hermeneutics of religions, which emphasizes distinct religious traditions, and a hermeneutics of religiosity, which emphasizes religiosity as an inherently multiple phenomenon.
In the second chapter I use this distinction to look at the three constituting concepts of multiple religious belonging: multiplicity, religion, and belonging. The concept of the multiple can be distinguished between a “spatial” multiplicity, which understands religions as bounded off spatial areas, of a “temporal” multiplicity, which understands the multiplicity of religion as an infinite process, without putting importance of faith boundaries. The concept of religion has developed in the study of religion to come to refer to “world religions”, such as Buddhism, Christianity, Islam… But the concept of religion also refers to something which is beyond religious traditions, for example a “religious truth” or “ultimate meaning”. Belonging can refer to “possession”, “membership”, or “desire” (longing). Normally, the second definition is emphasized in “multiple religious belonging”, but I conclude that the understanding of belonging as “longing” is more appropriate to understand multiple religious belonging.
In the third chapter, I compare Chinese understandings of religious diversity with multiple religious belonging. In China, religious traditions are not bounded off as faith communities with membership. Religious traditions can better be understood as complementary repositories of rituals, with different functions. Furthermore, the concept of “religion” has been absent for Chinese philosophy until very recently. This shows that Chinese culture has been more hybrid in understanding cultural multiplicities.
In the fourth chapter, I will develop the concept of “rhizomatic belonging”, based on these insights from earlier chapters and argue that this concept is a more fruitful way to approach the belonging of multiple religious belonging. The concept of the rhizome, as it has been coined by Deleuze and Guattari, expresses the inherent multiplicity and interconnectedness of an infinite, temporal, multiplicity. Individuals with a “multiple religious belonging”, do not belong to “multiple religions”, nor to a unified religious truth beyond religious traditions, but to an infinite flux and a specific network of religious elements that they have come to know in their lives.
Multiple religious belonging has challenged the scholar of religion to engage on a deeper level with the question what “the multiple” means in the context of religious belonging. The answer to this question is: rhizomatic belonging. Rhizomatic belonging can help us understand religious associations which are neither limited to a “religion”, nor a belonging to “everything”, nor a belonging that is simple “floating”. Rhizomatic belonging describes the specific connectedness of any individual in an infinitely diverse religious environment.