Introduction à la psychologie cognitive

Full text

Sommaire ......................................................................................... 7
Préface .............................................................................................. 9
Avant-propos .................................................................................... 13
CHAPITRE 1 La psychologie cognitive: présentation générale .......... 15
1.
La psychologie cognitive ............................................................. 17
2.
Les racines de la psychologie cognitive contemporaine ................ 17
2.1. Psychologie structuraliste ...................................................... 19
2.2. Psychologie associationniste .................................................. 20
2.3. Psychologie béhavioriste ....................................................... 20
2.4. Psychologies gestaltiste et fonctionnaliste .............................. 21
2.5. Psychologie cognitiviste ......................................................... 22
3.
Théories et modèles en psychologie cognitive ............................. 24
4.
Théorie du traitement de l’information ....................................... 25
4.1. Niveaux d’analyse de la cognition humaine ............................ 26
4.2. Architecture cognitive ........................................................... 27
CHAPITRE 2 La reconnaissance des formes et l’attention ................. 33
1.
La reconnaissance des formes ..................................................... 34
1.1. Approches générales de la reconnaissance des formes ............ 35
1.1.1.
Approche indirecte ............................................................ 35
1.1.2.
Approche directe .............................................................. 40
1.2. Modèles de la reconnaissance des formes .............................. 45
1.2.1.
Modèles par appariement de gabarits ................................... 45
1.2.2.
Modèles décompositionnels ................................................ 46
1.2.3.
La théorie de Marr ............................................................ 47
1.2.4.
La théorie des géons (Biederman) ........................................ 50
1.2.5.
Percevoir des formes, c’est combiner des informations
multiples ......................................................................... 53
1.2.6.
Le rôle de l’attention et du contexte .................................... 56
Table des matières
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 419 27/02/2018 11:14:19

420 n Introduction à la psychologie cognitive
2.
L’attention ................................................................................. 58
2.1. L’attention sélective .............................................................. 59
2.1.1.
La théorie du filtre sélectif .................................................. 60
2.1.2.
La théorie de l’atténuation ................................................. 63
2.1.3.
La théorie de la sélection tardive ......................................... 64
2.1.4.
Conclusion sur l’attention sélective ....................................... 65
2.2. L’allocation des ressources attentionnelles ............................. 66
2.2.1.
Distribution des ressources attentionnelles ............................ 67
2.2.2.
Automatisation des processus cognitifs ................................. 69
3.
Conclusions ................................................................................ 71
CHAPITRE 3 La mémoire: registres à court terme ........................... 75
1.
Une mémoire à très court terme: les registres sensoriels ............. 76
1.1. La mémoire iconique ............................................................. 77
1.2. La mémoire échoïque ............................................................ 79
2.
La Mémoire de Travail ................................................................ 80
2.1. Capacités et durée de la MDT ................................................ 81
2.2. L’oubli de l’information en MDT ............................................ 83
2.3. Le rappel en MDT ................................................................. 90
2.4. La représentation des informations en MDT ........................... 93
2.4.1.
Code verbal ..................................................................... 93
2.4.2.
Code visuel ...................................................................... 95
2.4.3.
Codes sémantiques ............................................................ 97
3.
Vers un modèle de la MDT ......................................................... 99
3.1. Le modèle de Baddeley ......................................................... 99
3.2. Arguments empiriques .......................................................... 101
3.3. Conclusions ........................................................................... 106
CHAPITRE 4 MLT: stockage etrécupération del’information .......... 111
1.
Le stockage des informations en mémoire .................................. 112
1.1. Comment étudie-t-on la mémoire ? ....................................... 113
1.2. Le mécanisme de répétition mentale de maintien .................. 114
1.3. Les mécanismes de répétition mentale d’élaboration ............. 119
1.4. Les souvenirs « flashs »: des mécanismes d’encodage
sans répétition ? ................................................................... 122
2.
La récupération des informations en mémoire ............................. 125
2.1. Les effets de contexte ........................................................... 126
2.2. Les effets de délai et d’interférence ....................................... 131
2.3. Les effets de testing .............................................................. 136
2.4. Les faux souvenirs ................................................................. 138
3.
Conclusions ................................................................................ 146
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 420 27/02/2018 11:14:19

Table des matières
n 421
CHAPITRE 5 MLT: Systèmes et représentations mnésiques .............. 151
1.
Existe-t-il plusieurs mémoires àlongterme ? ............................... 152
1.1. Critères de validation d’une classification ............................... 153
1.2. L’exemple de la distinction entre mémoire implicite
et mémoire explicite ............................................................. 156
1.3. Conclusion ............................................................................ 164
2.
Représentations imagées del’information ................................... 165
3.
Représentations en réseaux sémantiques ..................................... 170
3.3.1.
Postulats et principes du modèle .......................................... 170
3.3.2.
Validations expérimentales du modèle .................................. 172
3.1. Problèmes expérimentaux ..................................................... 173
3.1.1.
Effets de fréquence et de ressemblance sémantique ................ 174
3.1.2.
Effets de typicalité ............................................................ 175
3.2. Les modèles de jugement de la ressemblance ......................... 177
3.2.1.
Le modèle de Smith et collaborateurs ................................... 177
3.2.2.
Le modèle des contrastes proposé par Tversky ........................ 180
3.3. Conclusion ............................................................................ 182
4.
Représentations propositionnelles etschématiques ...................... 183
4.3.1.
Validations expérimentales ................................................. 186
4.1. Représentations schématiques ............................................... 187
4.1.1.
Qu’est-ce qu’une représentation schématique ? ...................... 187
4.1.2.
Validité psychologique ....................................................... 189
5.
Conclusion ................................................................................. 190
CHAPITRE 6 Le raisonnement ......................................................... 195
1.
Raisonnement conditionnel ......................................................... 197
1.1. Qu’est-ce qu’un énoncé conditionnel ? .................................. 197
1.2. Données empiriques sur le raisonnement conditionnel ........... 201
1.3. Raisonnement conditionnel et raisonnement scientifique ....... 204
2.
Le raisonnement syllogistique ..................................................... 207
2.1. Qu’est-ce qu’un syllogisme ? .................................................. 208
2.2. Performances des sujets en résolution de syllogismes ............. 210
2.3. Pourquoi certains syllogismes sont-ils plus difficiles
que d’autres ? ....................................................................... 210
2.3.1.
Hypothèse d’atmosphère .................................................... 211
2.3.2.
Hypothèse de conversion illicite ........................................... 212
2.3.3.
Hypothèse diagrammatique ................................................ 213
3.
Théories du raisonnement déductif ............................................. 214
3.1. La théorie des modèles mentaux ........................................... 214
3.2. Les théories de la logique mentale ........................................ 216
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 421 27/02/2018 11:14:20

422 n Introduction à la psychologie cognitive
4.
Le raisonnement inductif ............................................................ 218
4.1. Comment étudier le raisonnement inductif ? ......................... 220
4.2. Stratégies d’induction: la formation de concepts ................... 223
5.
Conclusion ................................................................................. 225
CHAPITRE 7 Jugements de probabilités et prises de décision ........... 231
1.
L’approche « classique » delaprisededécision:
lathéoriedeladécisionrationnelle ............................................. 233
1.1. Postulats de la théorie ........................................................... 233
1.2. Exemples .............................................................................. 234
1.3. Implications: axiomes de la décision rationnelle .................... 235
2.
Jugements de probabilité ............................................................ 237
2.1. Les jugements probabilistes et statistiques ............................. 237
2.2. Le recours à des heuristiques ................................................. 238
2.2.1.
Heuristique de disponibilité ................................................ 245
2.2.2.
Heuristique d’ancrage et d’ajustement .................................. 245
2.3. Les effets de la formulation ................................................... 246
2.4. Les effets de prise de distance et de conscience ...................... 248
2.4.1.
Mécanismes inconscients dans la prise de décision................... 250
3.
Prise de décision: théories .......................................................... 256
3.1. La théorie du prospect .......................................................... 256
3.2. La théorie des modèles mentaux ........................................... 258
3.2.1.
Postulats .......................................................................... 258
3.2.2.
Validations expérimentales ................................................. 260
4.
Conclusion ................................................................................. 262
CHAPITRE 8 La résolution deproblèmes ......................................... 267
1.
L’approche gestaltiste ................................................................. 269
1.1. Les étapes de la résolution de problème ................................ 269
1.2. Tentatives de validation expérimentale .................................. 272
1.2.1.
L’effet d’incubation ........................................................... 272
1.2.2.
L’effet d’insight ................................................................ 275
1.2.3.
L’effet de la représentation ................................................ 277
1.3. Conclusion de l’approche gestaltiste ...................................... 280
2.
L’approche cognitiviste ............................................................... 280
2.1. Distinctions entre types de problèmes .................................... 281
2.1.1.
Problèmes mal définis ........................................................ 281
2.1.2.
Problèmes bien définis ....................................................... 283
3.
Détermination des stratégies générales de résolution de problème ... 285
3.1. La méthode des protocoles verbaux ....................................... 286
3.2. La théorie de Newell et Simon: GPS ...................................... 289
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 422 27/02/2018 11:14:20

Table des matières
n 423
3.3. La représentation des problèmes ........................................... 291
3.3.1.
Validations expérimentales ................................................. 292
3.4. La recherche de la solution .................................................... 293
3.5. Les obstacles à la résolution de problème .............................. 296
3.5.1.
La fixité fonctionnelle ........................................................ 296
3.5.2.
L’ancrage dans un contexte, ou effet «Einstellung» ............... 297
4.
Validité écologique etrésolutiondeproblème ............................. 300
4.1. Variabilité stratégique en résolution de problème .................. 301
4.2. Qu’est-ce qu’une stratégie? .................................................. 303
4.3. Variabilité stratégique et performances en résolution
de problèmes ........................................................................ 306
4.3.1.
Performances stratégiques et effets expérimentaux ................. 307
4.4. Validité écologique et résolution de problème: conclusions ... 309
5.
Conclusion ................................................................................. 310
CHAPITRE 9 Le langage .................................................................. 317
1.
Langage: définition ................................................................... 319
1.1. Caractéristiques linguistiques ................................................. 319
1.2. Les niveaux d’analyse d’une langue ....................................... 320
2.
La structure d’une langue ........................................................... 321
2.1. Contraintes sublexicales et lexicales ....................................... 321
2.1.1.
Contraintes sublexicales ..................................................... 321
2.1.2.
Contraintes lexicales .......................................................... 323
2.2. Contraintes syntaxiques ......................................................... 324
2.2.1.
Analyse de l’organisation d’une phrase ................................. 325
2.2.2.
Analyse des règles de construction d’une phrase ..................... 326
2.3. Contraintes pragmatiques ..................................................... 327
2.3.1.
Les actes de langage .......................................................... 327
2.3.2.
Les maximes de la conversation ........................................... 329
3.
La compréhension du langage .................................................... 330
3.1. Méthodes d’étude de la compréhension du langage .............. 330
3.2. Effets des contraintes sublexicales ......................................... 331
3.2.1.
Perception de la parole: effets expérimentaux ....................... 332
3.2.2.
Un modèle de la perception de la parole ............................... 333
3.3. Effets des contraintes lexicales ............................................... 335
3.3.1.
Reconnaissance des mots: effets expérimentaux..................... 335
3.3.2.
Reconnaissance des mots: modèles ...................................... 338
3.4. Effets des contraintes syntaxico-sémantiques ......................... 343
3.4.1.
Effet des mots et des constituants ........................................ 343
3.4.2.
Extraction de la structure syntaxique .................................... 345
3.4.3.
Utilisation des marques de surface ....................................... 349
3.5. La compréhension de textes .................................................. 350
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 423 27/02/2018 11:14:20

424 n Introduction à la psychologie cognitive
4.
La production du langage ........................................................... 353
4.1. La production orale ............................................................... 353
4.1.1.
Modèle de Bock et Levelt (1994) .......................................... 354
4.1.2.
Modèle de Dell (1986) ........................................................ 355
4.1.3.
Données empiriques sur la production orale .......................... 356
4.2. La production écrite .............................................................. 358
4.2.1.
Le modèle de Hayes et Flower (1980) .................................... 358
4.2.2.
Données empiriques sur la production écrite .......................... 359
4.2.3.
Conclusion sur la production écrite ....................................... 366
5.
Conclusion sur la psychologie du langage ................................... 366
Glossaire ........................................................................................... 371
Bibliographie ..................................................................................... 383
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 424 27/02/2018 11:14:20

Aaronson, D.& Scarborough, H.S. (1977). Per-
formance theories for sentence coding: Some
quantitative models. Journal of Verbal Lear‑
ning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 277-303.
Abadie, M., Villejoubert, G., Waroquier, L. &
Vallée-Tourangeau, F.(2013). The interplay
between presentation material and decision
mode for complex choice preferences. Jour‑
nal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 682-691.
Abadie, M., Waroquier, L.& Terrier, P.(2016).
Information presentation format moderates
the unconscious-thought effect: The role of
recollection. Memory, 24, 1123-1133.
Abadie, M., Waroquier, L.& Terrier, P.(2013).
Gist memory in the unconscious thought
effect. Psychological Science, 24, 1253-1259.
Abadie, M., Waroquier, L.& Terrier, P.(2017).
The role of gist and verbatim memory in
complex decision making: Explaining the
unconscious-thought effect. Journal of Expe‑
rimental Psychology: Learning Memory and
Cognition, 43, 694-705.
Abbott, V., Black, J.B.&Smith, E.E. (1985). The
representation of scripts in memory. Journal
of Memory and Language, 24, 179-199.
Abu, M.Y. S.& Psaltis, D.(1987). Optical neural
computers. Scientific American, 256, 88-95.
Aggleton, J.P.&Waskett, L.(1999). The ability
of odours to serve as state-dependent cues
for real world memories: Can viking smells
aid the recall of viking experiences? British
Journal of Psychology, 9, 1-17.
Alamargot, D.& Chanquoy, L.(2011). Through
the models of writing: Ten years after and
vision for the future. In V. W. Berninger
(Ed.), Past, Present, and Future Contributions
of Cognitive Writing Research to Cognitive
Psychology. New York: Taylor & Francis/
Routledge, Psychology Press.
Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de l’homme
rationnel devant le risque: critique des postu-
lats et axiomes de l’école américaine./ Ratio-
nal man’s behavior in the presence of risk:
critique of the postulates and axioms of the
American school. Econometrica, 21, 503-546.
Allport, A.(1989). Visual attention. In M.I.Posner
(Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science. Cam-
bridge, MA: MIT Press.
Allport, A. (1993). Attention and control:
Have we been asking the wrong questions?
A critical review of twenty-five years. In
D.E.Meyer, S.Kornblum et al. (Eds.), Atten‑
tion and Performance 14: Synergies in experi‑
mental psychology, artificial intelligence, and
cognitive neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: PIT
Press.
Allport, D.A. (1980). Attention and performance.
In G.Claxton (Ed.), Cognitive psychology: New
Directions. London: Routledge&Kegan Paul.
Allport, D.A., Antonis, B.& Reynolds, P.(1972).
On the division of attention: A disproof of the
single channel hypothesis. Quarterly Journal
of Experimental Psychology, 24, 225-235.
Anders, R., Hinault, T.& Lemaire, P.(2018). Age-
related differences in strategy use: New insights
from computational modeling of evidence
accumulation. Journal of Cognitive Psychology.
doi: 10.1080/20445911.2017.1397676
Anders, R., Riès, S., van Maanen, L. & Alario,
F. X. (2015). Evidence accumulation as a
model for lexical selection. Cognitive Psycho‑
logy, 82, 57-73.
Bibliographie
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 383 27/02/2018 11:14:16

384 n Introduction à la psychologie cognitive
Anderson, J. R. (1974a). Retrieval of proposi-
tional information from long-term memory.
Cognitive Psychology, 6, 451-474.
Anderson, J.R. (1974b). Verbatim and proposi-
tional representation of sentences in imme-
diate and long- term memory. Journal of
Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13,
149-162.
Anderson, J. R. (1980). Concepts, propositions,
and schemata: What are the cognitive units?
Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 28,
121-162.
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of
cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character
of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, Inc.
Anderson, J.R. (1993). Rules of the Mind. Hillsdale,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Anderson, J. R. (2007). How Can the Human
Mind Occur in the Physical Universe? New
York: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, J.R.&Ross, B.H. (1980). Evidence
against a semantic-episodic distinction. Jour‑
nal of Experimental Psychology: Human Lear‑
ning and Memory, 6, 441-466.
Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighbo-
rhood size effects on lexical access: Acti-
vation or search? Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
15, 802-814.
Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighbo-
rhood effects on lexical access: Lexical
similarity or orthographic redundancy?
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory&Cognition, 18, 234-254.
Anzai, Y.& Simon, H.A. (1979). The theory of
learning by doing. Psychological Review, 86,
124-140.
Ardiale, E.& Lemaire, P.(2012). Age-related dif-
ferences in within-item strategy switching.
Psychology&Aging, 27, 1138-1151
Ardiale, E. & Lemaire, P. (2013a). Effects of
execution duration on within-item strategy
switching in young and older adults. Journal
of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 464-472.
Ardiale, E.& Lemaire, P.(2013b). Within-Item Stra-
tegy Switching in arithmetic: A comparative
study in children. Frontiers in Psychology.
Developmental Psychology, vol.4, article924,
1-8. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00924
Ardiale, E., Hodzik, S. & Lemaire, P. (2012).
Aging and Strategy Switch Costs: A study
in Arithmetic Problem Solving. L’Année psy‑
chologique, 112, 345‑360.
Arenberg, D.(1968). Concept problem solving in
young and old adults. Journal of Gerontology,
23, 279-283.
Arenberg, D. (1982). Changes with age in pro-
blem solving. In F.I. M.Craik&S.Trehub
(Eds.), Aging and cognitive processes. New
York: Plenum.
Ashcraft, M.H. (1987). Children’s knowledge of
simple arithmetic: A developmental model
and simulation. In J. C. Bisanz, C. J. Brai-
nerd & R. Kail (Eds.), Formal methods in
developmental psychology: Progress in cogni‑
tive development research (pp.302-338). New
York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Ashley, W. R., Harper, R. S. & Runyon, D. L.
(1951). The perceived size of coins in normal
and hypnotically induced economic states.
American Journal of Psychology, 64, 564-572.
Atkinson, R.C.&Shiffrin, R.M. (1968). Chapter:
Human memory: A proposed system and
its control processes. In K. W. Spence &
J.T. Spence, The psychology of learning and
motivation (Vol. 2, pp. 89-115). New York:
Academic Press.
Atkinson, R. C. & Shiffrin, R. M. (1971). The
control of short-term memory. Scientific
American, 225, 82-90.
Atwood, M.E.&Polson, P.G. (1976). A process
model for water jug problems. Cognitive Psy‑
chology, 8, 191-216.
Austin, J.L. (1962). How to do things with words.
New York: Oxford University Press.
Awh, E., Pashler, H. (2000). Evidence for split
attentional foci. Journal of Experimental Psy‑
chology: Human Perception and Performance,
26, 834-846.
Ayora, P.& Ferrand, L.(2015). Psychologie cogni‑
tive de la lecture. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
Baddeley, A.D. (1978). The trouble with levels:
A reexamination of Craik and Lockhart’s
framework for memory research. Psycholo‑
gical Review, 85, 139-152.
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 384 27/02/2018 11:14:16

Bibliographie
n 385
Baddeley, A.D. (1990). Human memory. Theory
and practice. Boston: allyn and Bacon. Trad.
fr. sous la direction de S.Hollard, La mémoire
humaine: théorie et pratique. Grenoble: PUG,
1993.
Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory.
Science, 255(5044), 556-559.
Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A
new compornent of working memory. Trends
in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417-423.
Baddeley, A. D. (2007). Working memory,
thought, and action. Oxford: Oxford Univer-
sity Press.
Baddely, A.D. (2012). Working memory: Theo-
ries, models, and controversies. Annual
Review of Psychology, 63, 1-29.
Baddeley, A.D.&Hitch, G.J. (1974). Working
memory. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The pschology
of learning and motivation (Vol.8). London:
Academic Press.
Baddeley, A. D. & Liberman, K. (1980). Spa-
tial working memory. In R.Nickerson (Ed.),
Attention and Performance (Vol.8). Hillsdale,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Bago, B.& De Neys, W.(2017). Fast logic? Exa-
mining the time course assumption of dual
process theory. Cognition, 158, 90-109.
Ball, L.J.&Thompson, V.A. (Eds.) (2018). Inter‑
national handbook of thinking and reasoning.
London: Psychology Press.
Bara, B. G., Bucciarelli, M. & Johnson, L. P. N.
(1995). Development of syllogistic reaso-
ning. American Journal of Psychology, 108,
157-193.
Barclay, C. D., Cutting, J. E. & Kozlowski, L. T.
(1978). Temporal and spatial factors in gait
perception that influence gender recognition.
Perception and Psychophysics, 23, 145-152.
Barnard, P.J. (1985). Interactive cognitive sub-
systems: A psycholinguistic approach to
short-term memory. In A.Ellis (Ed.), Progress
in the Psychology of Language (pp.197-258).
London: Erlbaum.
Barnard, P. J. (1987). Cognitive resources and
the learning of human-computer dialogs. In
J.M. Carroll (Ed.), Interfacing Thought: Cogni‑
tive Aspects of Human‑Computer Interaction
(pp.112-158). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Barrouillet, P., Bernardin, S. & Camos, V. (2004).
Time constraints and resource-sharing in
adults’ working memory spans. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 83-100.
Barrouillet, P.& Camos, V.(2006). La cognition
mathématique chez l’enfant. Marseille: Solal.
Barrouillet, P. & Camos, V. (2012). As time
goes by: Temporal constraints in working
memory. Current Direction in Psychological
Science, 21, 413-419.
Barrouillet P.& Camos, V.(2014). Attentional and
non-attentional systems in the maintenance of
verbal information in working memory: The
executive and phonological loops. Frontiers in
Human Neuroscience, 9, 900.
Barrouillet, P. & Camos, V. (2015). Working
Memory: Loss and Reconstruction. Hove: Psy-
chology Press.
Barrouillet, P.& Thevenot, C.(2013). On the pro-
blem size effect in small additions: Can we
really discard any counting-based account?
Cognition, 128, 35-44.
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: a study in
experimental and social psychology. New
York: Macmillan.
Bates, E., Masling, M. & Kintsch, W. (1978).
Recognition memory for aspects of dialogue.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Learning and Memory, 4, 187-197.
Bauer, P.J.&Mandler, J.M. (1989). Taxonomies
and triads: Conceptual organization in one-
to two-year-olds. Cognitive Psychology, 21,
156-184.
Beal, C.R. (1990). The development of text eva-
luation and revision skills. Child Develop‑
ment, 61, 247-258.
Begg, I.& Denny, J.P. (1969). Empirical reconci-
liation of atmosphere and conversion inter-
pretations of syllogistic reasoning errors.
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81,
351-354.
Benton, S.L., Kraft, R. G., Glover, J.A.&Plake,
B. S. (1984). Cognitive capacity differences
among writers. Journal of Educational Psy‑
chology, 76, 820-834.
Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psy‑
chology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 385 27/02/2018 11:14:16

386 n Introduction à la psychologie cognitive
Biederman, I. (1985). Human image understan-
ding: Recent research and a theory. Compu‑
ter Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing,
32, 29-73.
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-compo-
nents: A theory of human image understan-
ding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-117.
Biederman, I., Glass, A.L.&Stacy, E.W. (1973).
Searching for objects in real-world scenes.
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97,
22-27.
Bigand, E.& Pineau, M.(1996). Context effects
on melody recognition: A dynamic interpre-
tation. Current Psychology of Cognition, 15,
121-134.
Bigand, E. & Pineau, M. (1997). Global context
effects on musical expectancy. Perception
and Psychophysics, 59, 1098-1107.
Bilalić, M., McLeod, P.& Gobet, F.(2008). Why
good thoughts block better ones: The mecha-
nism of the pernicious einstellung effect.
Cognition, 108, 652-661.
Bilalić, M.,McLeod, P. & Gobet, F. (2008).
Inflexibility of experts – reality or myth?
Quantifying the einstellung effect in chess
masters. Cognitive Psychology, 56, 73-102.
Bjorklund, D.F.&Bjorklund, B.R. (1985). Orga-
nization versus item effects of an elaborated
knowledge base on children’s memory. Deve‑
lopmental Psychology, 21, 1120-1131.
Blanc, N.& Brouillet, D.(2003). Mémoire et com‑
préhension. Clamecy: In Press Éditions.
Blättler, C., Ferrari, V., Didierjean, A. &
Marmèche, E. (2013). L’extrapolation du
mouvement (Representational Momentum)
dans les scènes visuelles dynamiques. L’An‑
née psychologique, 113, 95-123.
Blaye, A. & Lemaire, P. (2007). Psychologie du
développement cognitif de l’enfant. Bruxelles:
De Boeck.
Bobrow, S. A. & Bower, G. H. (1969). Com-
prehension and recall of sentences. Journal
of Experimental Psychology, 80, 455-461.
Bock, K.(1996). Language production: Methods
and methodologies. Psychonomic Bulletin and
Review, 3, 395-421.
Bock, K.& Cutting, J.C. (1992). Regulating men-
tal energy: Performance units in language
production. Journal of Memory and Lan‑
guage, 31, 99-127.
Bock, K.& Levelt, W.(1994). Language produc-
tion: Grammatical encoding. In M.A. Gern-
bacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics.
San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
Bock, K. & Miller, C. A. (1991). Broken agree-
ment. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 45-93.
Bonati, L. (1994a). Propositional reasoning by
model? Psychological Review, 101, 725-733.
Bonatti, L. (1994b). Why should we abandon
the mental logic hypothesis? Cognition, 50,
17-39.
Bonin, P. (2013). Psychologie du langage. La
fabrique des mots. Approche cognitive
(2eéd.). Bruxelles: De Boeck.
Bonin, P.&Fayol, M.(1996). L’étude en temps
réel de la production du langage écrit, pour-
quoi et comment. Études de linguistique appli‑
quée, 101, 8-19.
Bonin, P., Fayol, M.& Gombert, J.E. (1997). Role
of phonological and orthographic codes in
picture naming and writing: An interference
paradigm study. Current Psychology of Cogni‑
tion, 16, 299-324.
Bonnardel, N. (2006). Créativité et conception.
Approches cognitives et ergonomiques. Mar-
seille: Solal.
Bonnardel, N.(2009). Activités de conception et
créativité: De l’analyse des facteurs cognitifs
à l’assistance aux activités de conception
créatives. Le Travail humain, 72, 5-22.
Bonnardel, N.& Didier, J.(2016). Enhancing crea-
tivity in the educational design context: An
exploration of the effects of design project-
oriented methods on students’ evocation pro-
cesses and creative output. Journal of Cognitive
Education and Psychology, 15, 80-101.
Bonnardel, N., Forens, M.& Lefevre, M.(2016).
Enhancing collective creative design: An
exploratory study on the influence of static
and dynamic personas in a virtual environ-
ment. Design Journal, 19, 221-235.
Bonnefon, J.-F. (2011). Le raisonneur et ses
modèles. Grenoble: Presses universitaires de
Grenoble.
Bonnefon, J.-F., Hopfensitz, A.& De Neys, W.(2013).
The modular nature of trustworthiness
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 386 27/02/2018 11:14:16

Bibliographie
n 387
detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
General, 142, 143-150.
Bonnefon, J.-F., Noveck, I., Bailet, S., Cheylus,
A., Delpuech, C., Bertrand, O., Fourneret, P.,
Van der Henst, J.-B.(2013). What MEG can
reveal about inference making: The case of
if… then sentences. Human Brain Mapping,
34, 684-697.
Bonnefond, J.-F., Kaliuzhna, M., Van der Henst,
J.B& De Neys, W.(2014). Disabling condi-
tional inferences: An EEG study. Neuropsy‑
chologia, 56, 255-262.
Bonnotte, I.& Fayol, M.(1997). Cognitive repre-
sentations of predicates and the use of past
tenses in French: A developmental approach.
First Language, 17, 75-101.
Bourne, C., Mavkay, C.E.&Holmes, E.A. (2013).
The neural basis of flashback formation: The
impact of viewing trauma. Psychological
Medicine, 43, 1521-1532.
Bower, G.H., Black, J.B. &Turner, T.J. (1979).
Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psycho‑
logy, 11, 77-220.
Brady, T.F., Konkle, T.& Alvarez, G.A. (2011).
A review of visual memory capacity:
Beyond individual items and toward struc-
tured representations. Journal of vision, 11,
1-34.
Braine, M.(1978). On the relation between the
natural logic of reasoning and standard logic.
Psychological Review, 85, 1-21.
Braine, M. (1990). The « Natural Logic »
approach to reasoning. In W. F. Overton
(Ed.), Reasoning, Necessity, and Logic: Develop‑
mental Perspectives, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum.
Broadbent, D.E. (1958). Perception and communi‑
cation. Oxford: Pergamon.
Brooks, L.R. (1968). Spatial and verbal compo-
nents of the act of recall. Canadian Journal
of Psychology, 22, 349-368.
Brown, R. & Kulik, J. (1977). Flashbulb memo-
ries. Cognition, 5, 73-99.
Brown, R. & McNeill, D. (1966). The « tip of
the tongue » phenomenon. Journal of Verbal
Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 325-337.
Bruner, J.S. (1957). Neural mechanisms in per-
ception. Psychological Review, 64, 340-358.
Bruner, J. S. & Goodman, C. C. (1947). Value
and need as organizing factors in perception.
Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,
42, 33-44.
Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J. & Austin, G. A.
(1956). A study of thinking. New York, NY:
John Wiley and Sons.
Brysbaert, M.& New, B.(2009). Moving beyond
Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation
of current word frequency norms and the
introduction of a new and improved word
frequency measure for American English.
Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977-990.
Brysbaert M., Keuleers, E. & New, B. (2011).
Assessing the usefulness of Google Books’
word frequencies for psycholinguistic
research on word processing. Frontiers in
Psychology, 2, 27.
Bucciarelli, M. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1999).
Strategies in syllogistic reasoning. Cognitive
Sciences, 23, 247-303.
Butera F, Caverni J. P & Rossi S. (2005). Inte-
raction with a high-versus low-competence
influence source in inductive reasoning.
Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 173-90.
Byrne, M. D. (2012). Unified theories of cogni-
tion. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews‑Cogni‑
tive Science, 3, 431-438.
Caillès, S., Denhière, G. & Kintsch, W. (1998).
Representation of knowledge in memory:
Evidence from primed recognition. Paper
presented at the Twentieth Annual Confe‑
rence of the Cognitive Science Society, Univer-
sity of Wisconsin-Madison, U.S.A.
Camos, V. (2017). Domain-specific vs. Domain-
general maintenance in working memory:
Reconciliation within the Time-Based
Resource Sharing Model. In B. Ross (Ed.),
Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 67,
135-171.
Caplan, D.(1972). Clause boundaries and reco-
gnition latencies for words in sentences. Per‑
ception and Psychophysics, 12, 73-76.
Carlson, B. W. (1990). Anchoring and adjust-
ment in judgments under risk. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,
and Cognition, 16, 665-676.
Carpenter, P.A., Miyake, A.& Just, M.A. (1995).
Language comprehension: Sentence and
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 387 27/02/2018 11:14:16

388 n Introduction à la psychologie cognitive
discourse processing. Annual Review of Psy‑
chology, 46, 91-100.
Carroll, M. V., Byrne, B. & Kirsner, K.(1985).
Autobiographical memory and perceptual
learning: A developmental study using
picture recognition, naming latency, and
perceptual identification. Memory and Cogni‑
tion, 13, 273-279.
Castiello, U.& Jeannerod, M. (1991). Measuring
time to awareness. Neuroreport, 2, 797-800.
Caverni, J. P. & Rossi, S. (1997). A nice bit of
scandal: About a disconfirmation bias in the
Wason’s 2-4-6 problem. Swiss Journal of Psy‑
chology, 56, 239-242.
Caverni, J. P., Rossi, S. & Péris, J. L. (2000). The
alternatives taken into account in hypotheses
testing: Two new paradigms for investigating
strategies In J.A. Garcia-Madruga, N.Carriedo
& M. J. Gonzalez-Labra (Eds.), Mental Model
Reasoning (pp.133-141). Madrid: UNED.
Ceci, S. J. & Bruck, M. (1993). Suggestibility
of the child witness: A historical review
and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113,
403-439.
Ceci, S.J., Ross, D.F.&Toglia, M.P. (1987). Sug-
gestibility of children’s memory: Psycholegal
implications. Journal of Experimental Psycho‑
logy: General, 116, 38-49.
Ceraso, J. & Provitera, A. (1971). Sources of
error in syllogistic reasoning. Cognitive Psy‑
chology, 2, 400-410.
Chan, J. C. K. & LaPaglia, J.A. (2013). Impai-
ring existing declarative memory in humans
by disrupting reconsolidation. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences, 110,
9409-9313.
Chanquoy, L. & Negro, I. (1996). Subject-verb
agreement errors in written productions: A
study of French children and adults. Journal
of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 553-570.
Chanquoy, L., Foulin, J. N. & Fayol, M. (1990).
Temporal management of short text writing
by children and adults. Cahiers de psychologie
cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition,
10, 513-540.
Chapman, L.J.&Chapman, J.P. (1959). Atmos-
phere effect re-examined. Journal of Experi‑
mental Psychology, 58, 220-226.
Chekaf, M., Cowan, N.& Mathy, F.(2016). Chunk
formation in immediate memory and how it
relates to data compression. Cognition, 155,
96-107
Chen, Z.& Cowan, N.(2009). Core verbal wor-
king memory capacity: The limit in words
retained without covert articulation. Quar‑
terly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62,
1420-1429.
Cheng, P.W.&Holyoak, K.J. (1985). Pragmatic
reasoning schemas. Cognitive Psychology, 17,
391-416.
Cheng, P.W., Holyoak, K.J., Nisbett, R.E.&Oli-
ver, L.M. (1986). Pragmatic versus syntactic
approaches to training deductive reasoning.
Cognitive Psychology, 18, 293-328.
Cherry, E.C. (1953). Some experiments on the
recognition of speech, with one and with
two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America, 25, 975-979.
Cherubini, P., Castelvecchio, E. & Cherubini,
A. M. (2005). Generation of hypotheses in
Wason’ 2-4-6 task: An information theory
approach. Quarterly Journal of Experimental
Psychology Section A –Human Experimental
Psychology, 58, 309-332.
Chi, M. T. H. & Glaser, R. (1985). Problem-sol-
ving ability. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Human
abilities: An information processing approach
(pp.227-248). New York: Freeman.
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The
Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, N.(1965). Aspects of the theory of syn‑
tax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Knowledge of language:
Its elements and origins. Philosophical Tran‑
sactions of the Royal Society of London,
295(1077, Series B), 223-234.
Christensen, S. J. J. & Beach, L. R. (1984). The
citation bias: Fad and fashion in the judg-
ment and decision literature. American Psy‑
chologist, 39, 75-78.
Christopher, M.E. et al., (2012). Predicting word
reading and comprehension with executive
function and speed measures across deve-
lopment: A latent variable analysis. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: General, 141,
470-488.
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 388 27/02/2018 11:14:16

Bibliographie
n 389
Chrostowski, J. J. & Griggs, R. A. (1985). The
effects of problem content, instructions, and
verbalization procedure on Wason’s selec-
tion task. Current Psychological Research and
Reviews, 4, 99-107.
Clark, H.,H., Chase, W.G. (1972). On the pro-
cess of comparing sentence against pictures.
Cognitive Psychology, 3, 472-517.
Clarke-Stewart, A., Thompson, W. & Lepore,
S.(1989). Manipulating children’s interpreta-
tions through interrogation. Paper presented
at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for
Research on Child Development, Kansas City,
MO.
Cleeremans, A. & Content, A. (1997). Current
directions in implicit learning: Where is it
that we were suppose to go again? Psycholo‑
gica Belgica, 37, 1-7.
Cleeremans, A. & French, R. M. (1996). From
chicken squawking to cognition: Levels of
description and the computational approach
in psychology. Psychologica Belgica, 36, 5-29.
Clément, E. (2006). Approche de la flexibilité
cognitive dans la problématique de la réso-
lution de problème. L’Année psychologique,
106, 415-434.
Cohen, G.& Faulkner, D.(1983). Age differences
in performance on two information-proces-
sing tasks: Strategy selection and proces-
sing efficiency. Journal of Gerontology, 38,
447-454.
Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K. & McClelland, J. L.
(1990). On the control of automatic pro-
cesses: A parallel distributed processing
account of the Stroop effect. Psychological
Review, 97, 332-361.
Collette, F., Van der Linden, M., Laueys, S.,
Delfiore, G., Degueldre, C., Luxen, A., et al.
(2005). Exploring the unity and diversity of
the neural substrates of executive functio-
ning. Human Brain Mapping, 25, 409-423.
Collins, A.M.&Loftus, E.F. (1975). A spreading-
activation theory of semantic processing.
Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
Collins, A. M. & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrie-
val time from semantic memory. Journal
of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8,
240-247.
Collins, A.M.&Quillian, M.R. (1970). Does cate-
gory size affect categorization time? Journal
of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9,
432-438.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon,
R.& Ziegler, J.C. (2001). DRC: A dual-route
cascaded model of visual word recognition
and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108,
204-256
Connine, C.M., Blasko, D.G.&Titone, D.(1993).
Do the beginnings of spoken words have
a special status in auditory word recogni-
tion? Journal of Memory and Language, 32,
193-210.
Conrad, C.(1972). Cognitive economy in seman-
tic memory. Journal of Experimental Psy‑
chology, 92, 149-154.Conrad, R. (1964).
Acoustic confusions in immediate memory.
British Journal of Psychology, 55, 75-84.
Conrad, R. & Hull, A. J. (1964). Information,
acoustic confusion and memory span. British
Journal of Psychology, 55, 429-432.
Content, A. & Frauenfelder, U. H. (1996). On
the need for computer modeling: The case
of language processing. Psychologica Belgica,
36, 113-144.
Cooper, L.A.&Shepard, R.N. (1973). The time
required to prepare for a rotated stimulus.
Memory and Cognition, 1, 246-250.
Cooper, J.A., Worthy, D.A., Gorlick, M.A.&Mad-
dox, W.T. (2013). Scaffolding across the lifes-
pan in history-dependent decision making.
Psychology and Aging, 28, 505-514.
Cowan, N.(1999). An embedded-processes model
of working memory. In A.Miyake&P.Shah
(Eds.), Models of Working Memory
(pp. 62-101). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
University Press.
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in
short-term memory: A reconsideration of
mental storage capacity. Behavioural and
Brain Sciences, 24, 87-114.
Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four:
How is working memory capacity limited,
and why? Current Directions in Psychological
Sciences, 19, 51-57.
Cowan, N. (2016). Working memory capacity.
New York, Routledge [Original Edition
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 389 27/02/2018 11:14:16

390 n Introduction à la psychologie cognitive
2005]: Psychology Press and Routledge Clas-
sic Edition.
Cowart, W. (1982). Autonomy and interaction
in the language processing system: A reply
to Marslen-Wilson and Tyler. Cognition, 12,
109-117.
Cowley, M. & Byrne, R. M. J. (2005). Chess
master’s hypothesis testing. Proceedings of
the Twenty‑sixth Annual Conference of the
Cognitive Science Society (pp.250-255). New
York: Psychology Press.
Craik, F.I. M.(1971). Age differences in recogni-
tion memory. Quaterly Journal of Experimen‑
tal Psychology, 23, 316-323.
Craik, F. I. & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels
of processing: A framework for memory
research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Ver‑
bal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
Craik, F.I.&Tulving, E.(1975). Depth of proces-
sing and the retention of words in episodic
memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
General, 104, 268-294.
Craik, F.I.& Watkins, M.J. (1973). The role of
rehearsal in short-term memory. Journal of
Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12,
599-607.
Crowder, R. (1982). A common basis for audi-
tory sensory storage in perception and
immediate memory. Perception&Psychophy‑
sics, 31, 477-483.
Curci, A., Luminet, O., Finkenauer, C. & Gisle,
L. (2001). Flashbulb memories in social
groups: A comparative test-retest study
of the memory of french president Mitte-
rand’s death in a French and a Belgian group.
Memory, 9, 81-101.
Cutting, J.E.&Kozlowski, L.T. (1977). Recogni-
zing friends by their walk: Gait perception
without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psy‑
chonomic Society, 9, 353-356.
Cutting, J. E., Proffitt, D. R. & Kozlowski, L. T.
(1978). A biomechanical invariant for gait
perception. Journal of Experimental Psycho‑
logy: Human Perception and Performance, 4,
357-372.
Daneman, M.& Carpenter, P.A. (1980). Indivi-
dual differences in working memory and rea-
ding. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal
Behavior, 19, 450-466.
Daneman, M.& Green, I.(1986). Individual dif-
ferences in comprehending and producing
words in context. Journal of Memory and
Language, 25, 1-18.
Daneman, M. & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Wor-
king memory and language comprehension:
A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulle‑
tin&Review, 3, 422-433.
Darwin, C. J., Turvey, M. T. & Crowder, R. C.
(1972). An auditory analogue of the Sper-
ling partial report procedure: Evidence for
brief auditory storage. Cognitive Psychology,
3, 255-267.
De Neys, W.(2012). Bias and conflict: A case for
logical intuitions. Perspectives on Psychologi‑
cal Science, 7, 28-38.
De Neys, W. (2014). Conflict detection, dual
processes, and logical intuitions: Some clari-
fications. Thinking&Reasoning, 20, 169-187.
De Neys, W. & Osman, M. (Eds.) (2013). New
approaches in reasoning research. Hove: Psy-
chology Press.
De Neys, W.& Bonnefon, J.F. (2013). The whys
and whens of individual differences inthin-
king biases. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17,
172-178.
De Neys, W., Schaeken, W. & d’Ydewalle,
G. (2005). Working memory and everyday
conditional reasoning: Retrieval and inhi-
bition of stored counterexamples. Thin‑
king&Reasoning, 11, 349-381.
De Neys, W., Vartanian, O. & Goel, V. (2008).
Smarter than we think: When our brains
detect hat we are biased. Psychological
Science, 19, 483-489.
De Neys, W., Moyens, E. & Vansteenwegen,
D. (2010). Feeling we’re biased: Autonomic
arousal and reasoning conflict. Cognitive,
Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 12,
123-130.
Deese, J.(1959). On the prediction of occurrence
of particular verbal intrusions in immediate
recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology,
58, 17-22.
Dehaene, S. (2014). Le Code de la conscience,
Paris: Odile Jacob.
Delaney, P.F., Reder, L.M., Staszewski, J.J., Ritter,
F. E. (1998). The strategy-specific nature of
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 390 27/02/2018 11:14:17

Bibliographie
n 391
improvement: The power law applies by stra-
tegy within task. Psychological Science, 9, 1-7.
Dell, G.S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory
of retrieval in sentence production. Psycholo‑
gical Review, 93, 283-321.
Denhière, G. & Deschenes, A. J. (1987). Please
tell me what you know, I will tell you what
you can learn. In E.De Corte&H.Lodewijks
(Eds.), Learning and instruction: European
research in an international context (Vol.1).
Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, Inc.
Denney, N. W., Pearce, K. A. & Palmer, A.M.
(1982). A developmental study of adult’s
performance on traditional and pratical
problem-solving tasks. Experimental Aging
Research, 8, 115-118.
Desmette, D., Hupet, M., Schelstraete, M.-A. &
Van der Linden, M. (1995). Adaptation en
langue française du « reading span test »
de Daneman et Carpenter (1980). L’Année
psychologique, 95, 459-482.
Deutsch, J.A.&Deutsch, D.(1963). Attention:
Some theoretical considerations. Psychologi‑
cal Review, 70, 51-61.
Didierjean, A.(2015). La madeleine et le savant.
Balade proustienne du côté de la psychologie
cognitive. Paris: Le Seuil.
Didierjean, A. & Cauzinille-Marmèche, E.
(1997). Eliciting self-explanations improves
problem solving: What processes are
involved? Current Psychology of Cognition,
16, 325-351.
Didierjean, A.& Cauzinille-Marmèche, E.(1998).
Reasoning by analogy: Is it schema-mediated
or case-based? European Journal of Psycho‑
logy of Education, 13, 385-398.
Didierjean, A., Cauzinille-Marmèche, E.& Savina,
Y. (1999). Learning from examples: Case-
based reasoning in chess for novices. Current
Psychology of Cognition, 18, 337-361.
Didierjean, A., Ferrari, V.& Blättler, C.(2014).
Role of knowledge in motion extrapolation.
The relevance of an approach contrasting
experts and novices. The Psychology of Lear‑
ning and Motivation, 61, 215‑235.
Didierjean, A. & Gobet, F. (2008). Sherlock
Holmes: An expert’s view of expertise. Bri‑
tish Journal of Psychology, 99, 109-125.
Didierjean, A. & Nogry, S. (2004). Reducing
structural-element salience on a source pro-
blem produces later success in analogical
transfer: What role does source difficulty
play? Memory&Cognition, 32, 1053-1064.
Dienes, Z. & Berry, D. C. (1997). Implicit lear-
ning: Below the subjective threshold. Psycho‑
nomic Bulletin Review, 4, 3-23.
Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M.W., van der Leij, A.&
van Baaren, R. B. (2009). Predicting soccer
matches after unconscious and conscious
thought as a function of expertise. Psycholo‑
gical Science, 20, 1381-1387.
Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren,
L.F.&van Baaren, R.B. (2006). On making
the right choice: The deliberation-without
attention effect. Science, 311, 1005-1007.
Dijksterhuis, A.(2004). Think different: The merits
of unconscious thought in preference develop-
ment and decision making. Journal of Persona‑
lity and Social Psychology, 87, 586-598.
Dijksterhuis, A. & Nordgren, L. F. (2006). A
theory of unconscious thought. Perspective in
Psychological Sciences, 1, 95-109.
Dominowski, R. L. & Ekstrand, B. R. (1967).
Direct and associative priming in anagram
solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology,
74, 84-86.
Dufau, S., Grainger, J.& Ziegler, J.C. (2012). How
to say ‘No’ to a nonword: A leaky compe-
ting accumulator model of lexical decision.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1117-1128.
Dulaney, P. F., Reder, L. M., Staszewski,
J. J. & Ritter, F. (1998). The strategy-speci-
fic nature of improvement. The power law
applies by strategy within task. Psychological
Science, 9, 1-7.
Dunbar, K.(1995). How scientists really reason:
Scientific reasoning in real-world laborato-
ries. In T.B. Ward&S.M. Smith (Eds.), Crea‑
tive thought: An investigation of conceptual
structures and processes. Washington, D.C.:
American Psychological Association.
Dunbar, K.(1997). How scientists think: On-line
creativity and conceptual change in science.
In R.J. Stenberg&J.E. Davidson (Eds.), The
nature of insight. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 391 27/02/2018 11:14:17

392 n Introduction à la psychologie cognitive
Duncker, K.(1945). On problem-solving. Psycho‑
logical Monographs, 58, i-113.
Dusjardin, K.& Lemaire, P.(2008). Neuropsycho‑
logie du vieillissement normal et pathologique.
Paris: Masson.
Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Über das gedächtnis:
Untersuchungen zur experimentellen Psycho‑
logie. Leipzig: Duncker und Humbolt.
Ecker, U.K.H., Lewandowski, S.& Tang, D.T.W.
(2010). Explicit warnings reduce but do
not eliminate the continued influence of
misinformation. Memory & Cognition, 38,
1087-2000.
Ehinger, K. A., Hidalgo-Sotelo, B., Torraiba,
A.& Olivia, A.(2009). Modelling search for
people in 900 scenes: A combined source
model of eye guidance, Visual Cognition, 17,
945-978.
Ehrlich, M.F.&Delafoy, M.(1990). La mémoire
de travail: structure, fonctionnement, capa-
citée/ Working memory: Structure, func-
tion and capacity. L’Année psychologique, 90,
403-427.
Eich, E.(1985). Context, memory, and integrated
item/context imagery. Journal of Experimen‑
tal Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cogni‑
tion, 11, 764-770.
Eich, J. E., Weingartner, H., Stillman, R. C. &
Gillin, J.C. (1975). State-dependent accessi-
bility of retrieval cues in the retention of a
categorized list. Journal of Verbal Learning
and Verbal Behavior, 14, 408-417.
Ellis, A. W. (1984). Introduction to Bramwell’s
(1897) case of word meaning deafness.
Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1, 245-258.
Ellis, H.D.&Young, A.W. (1988). Training in
face-processing skills for a child with acqui-
red prosopagnosia. Developmental Neuropsy‑
chology, 4, 283-294.
Ellis, S. & Siegler, R. S. (1994). Development of
problem solving. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Hand‑
book of perception and cognition. Vol. 12.
Thinking and problem solving (pp.333-367).
New York: Academic Press.
Engle, R.W., Kane, M.J., Tuholski, S.W. (1999).
Individual differences in working memory
capacity and what they tell us about control-
led attention, general fluid intelligence,
and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In
A.Miyake&P.Shah (Eds.), Models of wor‑
king memory: Mechanisms of active mainte‑
nance and executive control (pp. 102-134),
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engle, R. W. & Kane, M. J. (2004). Executive
attention, working memory capacity and a
two-factor theory of cognitive control. In
B.Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and
motivation (pp.145-199). New York: Elsevier
Erdelyi, M.H.&Kleinbard, J.(1978). Has Ebbin-
ghaus decayed with time? The growth of
recall (hypermnesia) over days. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Learning
and Memory, 4, 275-289.
Erickson, J. R. (1974). A set analysis theory
of behavior in formal syllogistic reasoning
tasks. In R.L. Solso (Ed.), Theories in cognitive
psychology. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
Eriksen, C.W. & St James, J.D. (1986). Visual
attention within and around the field of
focal attention: A zoom lens model. Percep‑
tion&Psychophysics, 40, 225-240.
Eustache, F&Desgranges, B.(2010). Les chemins
de la mémoire. Paris: INSERM, Le Pommier.
Evans, J. S. B. T. (1977). Toward a statistical
theory of reasoning. Quarterly Journal of
Experimental Psychology, 29, 621-635.
Evans J.S. B.T. (1989). Bias in human reasoning:
Causes and consequences. Brighton: Erlbaum.
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2006). The heuristic-analytic
theory of reasoning, judgment, and social
cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59,
255-278.
Evans, J.S. B.T. (2013). Reasoning, biases, and
dual processes: The lasting impact of Wason
(1960). Quarterly Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 69, 2076-2092
Evans, J.S. B.T. (1982). On statistical intuitions
and inferential rules: A discussion of Kahne-
man and Tversky. Cognition, 12, 319-323.
Evans, J.S. B.T.&Newstead, S. E. (1977). Lan-
guage and reasoning: A study of temporal
factors. Cognition, 5, 265-283.
Evans, J.S. B.T., Newstead, S.E.&Byrne, R.M.
J.(1993). Human Reasoning: The Psychology
of deduction. Hove, East Sussex: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 392 27/02/2018 11:14:17

Bibliographie
n 393
Fabre, J. M. (1993). Contexte et jugement, de
la psychophysique à la responsabilité. Lille:
Presses universitaires de Lille.
Fabricius, W.V., Sophian, C.& Wellman, H.M.
(1987). Young children’s sensitivity to logical
necessity in their inferential search beha-
vior. Child Development, 58, 409-423.
Farah, M.J., Hammond, K.M., Levine, D.N.&Cal-
vanio, R. (1988). Visual and spatial mental
imagery: Dissociable systems of representa-
tion. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 439-462.
Fayol, M.(1997). Des idées au texte. Paris: Presses
universitaires de France.
Fayol, M. (Ed.) (2002). Production du langage:
traité des sciences cognitives. Paris: Hermès.
Fayol, M. & Got, C. (1991). Automatisme et
contrôle dans la production écrite: les
erreurs d’accord sujet-verbe chez l’enfant et
l’adulte. L’Année psychologique, 91, 187-205.
Fayol, M.& Lemaire, P.(1989). Une étude expé-
rimentale du fonctionnement distinctif de la
ponctuation dans les phrases. Perspectives
génétiques. Études de linguistiques appliquées,
73, 71-83.
Fayol, M., Hickmann, M., Bonnotte, I.& Gombert,
J.E. (1993). The effects of narrative context
on French verbal inflections: A developmen-
tal perspective. Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research, 22, 453-478.
Fayol, M., Largy, P.& Lemaire, P.(1994). Cogni-
tive overload and orthographic errors:
When cognitive overload enhances subject-
verb agreement errors: A study in French
written language. Quarterly Journal of Expe‑
rimental Psychology: Human Experimental
Psychology, 47A, 437-464.
Feigenbaum. E.A. & Simon, H.A. (1984).
EPAM·like models of recognition and lear-
ning. Cognitive Science, 8, 305-336.
Feist, G.& Gorman, M.(2013). Handbook of the
psychology of science. New York: Springer
Publishing Company
Fernandez, A.& Glenberg, A.M. (1985). Chan-
ging environmental context does not reliably
affect memory. Memory and Cognition, 13,
333-345.
Ferrand, L. (2007). Psychologie cognitive de la
lecture. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
Ferrand, L., New, B., Brysbaert, M., Keuleers,E.,
Bonin, P., Méot, A., Augustinova, M. &
Pallier, C. (2010). The French Lexicon Pro-
ject: Lexical decision data for 38,840 French
words and 38,840 pseudowords. Behavior
Research Methods, 42, 488-496.
Ferreira, F. & Clifton, C. (1986). The inde-
pendence of syntactic processing. Journal of
Memory and Language, 25, 348-368.
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case.
In E. Bach & R. T. Harms (Eds.), Univer‑
sals of linguistic theory. New York: Holt,
Rinehart&Winston.
Fisk, A. D., Derrick, W. L. & Schneider,
W. (1986-1987). A methodological assess-
ment and evaluation of dual-task paradigms.
Current psychological Research and Reviews,
5, 315-327.
Fodor, J.A. (1972). L’explication en psychologie.
Paris: Seghers.
Fodor, J.A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cam-
bridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, J.A., Bever, T.G.&Garrett, M.F. (1974).
The psychology of language: An introduction
to psycholinguistics and generative gram-
mar. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Forbus, K. D., Gentner, D. & Law, K. (1994).
MAC/FAC: A model of similarity-based
retrieval. Cognitive Science, 19, 141-205.
Ford, M.(1985). Review of mental models. Lan‑
guage, 61, 897-903.
Forster, K.I.&Chambers, S.M. (1973). Lexical
access and naming time. Journal of Verbal
Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627-635.
Forster, K. I. & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition
priming and frequency attenuation in lexi-
cal access. Journal of Experimental Psycho‑
logy: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10,
680-698.
Foss, D. (1998). Two strands of scholarship on
language comprehension: Phoneme monito-
ring and discourse context. Journal of Psy‑
cholinguistic Research, 27, 191-202.
Foulin, J.N.&Fayol, M.(1988). Étude en temps
réel de la production écrite chez des Enfants
de sept et huit ans. / An on-line study of
written text production in 7 and 8 year
old children. Special Issue: Early literacy.
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 393 27/02/2018 11:14:17

394 n Introduction à la psychologie cognitive
European Journal of Psychology of Education,
3, 461-475.
Fox, M. C., Ericsson, K. A. & Best, R. (2010).
Do procedures for verbal reporting of
thinking have to be reactive? A meta-ana-
lysis and recommendations for best repor-
ting methods. Psychological Bulletin, 137,
316-344.
Frase, L. T. (1975). Prose processing. In G. H.
Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and
motivation (Vol. 9). New York: Academic
Press.
Frauenfelder, U.H.&Segui, J.(1989). Phoneme
monitoring and lexical processing: Evidence
for associative context effects. Memory and
Cognition, 17, 134-140.
Frazier, L.(1998). Getting there (Slowly). Journal
of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 123-146.
Frazier, L.& Rayner, K.(1982). Making and cor-
recting errors during sentence comprehen-
sion: Eye movements in the analysis of
structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive
Psychology, 14, 178-210.
Frederiksen, C.H.&Breuleux, A.(1990). Monito-
ring cognitive processing in semantically com-
plex domains. In N. Frederiksen&R.Glaser
(Eds.), Diagnostic monitoring of skill and
knowledge acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Law-
rence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Frenck-Mestre, C.& Pynte, J.(1997). Syntactic
ambiguity resolution while reading in second
and native languages. Quarterly Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Experimen‑
tal Psychology, 50A, 119-148.
Frensch, P.A.&Funke, J.(Eds.) (1995). Complex
problem solving: The European perspective.
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Frey D., Bago, B. & De Neys, W. (2017). Com-
mentary: Seeing the conflict: an attentio-
nal account of reasoning errors. Frontiers
in Psychology, 8, 1284. doi: 10.3389/
fpsyg.2017.01284
Friedman, N.P., Miyake, A., Young, S.E., DeFries,
J. C., Corley, R. P. & Hewitt, J. K. (2008).
Individual differences in executive functions
are almost entirely genetic in origin. Jour‑
nal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137,
201-225.
Fromkin, V. A. (1993). Speech production. In
J.B. Gleason&N.B. Ratner (Eds.), Psycholin‑
guistics. Orlando, FL: Hartcourt Brace.
Frost, N.(1972). Encoding and retrieval in visual
memory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psy‑
chology, 95, 317-326.
Fukukura, J., Fergusson, M.J.&Fujita, K.(2013).
Psychological distance can improve decision
making under information overload via gist
memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
General, 142, 658-65.
Fulgosi, A.& Guilford, J.P. (1968). Short-term
incubation in divergent production. Ameri‑
can Journal of Psychology, 81, 241-246.
Funder, D.C.& Ozer, D.J. (1997). Pieces of the
personality puzzle: Readings in theory and
research. New York, NY: Norton and Co, Inc.
Fuster, J.M. (1995). Memory and planning: Two
temporal perspectives of frontal lobe func-
tion. In H.H. Jaspert&S.Riggio (Eds.), Epile‑
psy and the functional anatomy of the frontal
lobe. Advances in neurology (Vol. 66). New
York, NY: Raven Press.
Gale, M.& Ball, L.J. (2012). Contrast class cues
and performance facilitation in a hypothe-
sis-testing task: Evidence for an iterative
counterfactual model. Memory&Cognition,
40, 408-419.
Gallo, D.A. (2010).False memories and fantas-
tic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion.
Memory&Cognition, 38, 833-848.
Gallo, D. A. (2006). Associative illusions of
memory: False memory research in DRM and
related tasks. New York: Psychology Press.
Galotti, K.M., Baron, J.& Sabini, J.P. (1986). Indi-
vidual differences in syllogistic reasoning:
Deduction rules or mental models? Journal
of Experimental Psychology: General, 115,
16-25.
Galotti, K.M., Komatsu, L.K.&Voelz, S.(1997).
Children’s differential performance on
deductive and inductive syllogisms. Develop‑
mental Psychology, 33, 70-78.
Gardner, H. (1985). The Mind’s new science: A
history of the cognitive revolution. New York:
Basic Books.
Gardner, B. T. & Gardner, R. A. (1971). Evi-
dence for sentence constituents in the early
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 394 27/02/2018 11:14:17

Bibliographie
n 395
utterances of child and chimpanzees. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: General, 104,
244-267.
Garrett, M. F. (1975). The analysis of sentence
production. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psycho‑
logy of learning and motivation (Vol.9). San
Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Garrett, M.F. (1976). Syntactic processes in sen-
tence production. In R.J. Wales&E.Walker
(Eds.), New approaches to language mecha‑
nisms. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Garrett, M.F. (1980). Levels of processing in sen-
tence production. In B.Butteworth (Ed.), Lan‑
guage production: Speech and talk (Vol. 1).
San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Gates, A. I. (1917). Recitation as a factor in
memorizing. Archives of Psychology, 6(40).
Geary, C.& Wiley, J.G. (1991). Cognitive addi-
tion: strategy choice and speed-of-processing
differences in young and elderly adults. Psy‑
chology and Aging, 6, 474-483
Gentner, D. & Marvallia, F. (2017). Analogical
Reasoning. In L. J. Ball & V. A. Thompson
(Eds.), International handbook of thinking and
reasoning. London: Psychology Press.
George, C. (1997). Polymorphisme du raisonne‑
ment humain. Paris: Presses universitaires
de France.
Geraerts, E., Bernstein, D. M., Merckelbach, H.,
Linders, C., Raymaekers, L. & Loftus, E. F.
(2008). Lasting false beliefs and their beha-
vioral consequences. Psychological Science,
19, 749-753.
Gernsbacher, M.A. (1984). Resolving 20years
of inconsistent interactions between lexical
familiarity and orthography, concreteness,
and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psy‑
chology: General, 113, 256281.
Gernsbacher, M.A. (1985). Surface information
loss in comprehension. Cognitive Psychology,
17, 324-363.
Gibson, J.J. (1950). The perception of the visual
world. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gibson, J.J. (1966). The senses considered as per‑
ceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to
visual perception. Boston: Hougton Mifflin.
Gick, M.L.&Holyoak, K.J. (1980). Analogical
problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12,
306-355.
Gick, M. L. & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema
induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive
Psychology, 15, 1-38.
Gigerenez, G., Hertwig, R.& Pachur, T.(2011).
Heuristics: The foundations of adaptive beha‑
vior. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gilhooly, K. J. (2016). Incubation and Intuition
in Creative Problem Solving. Frontiers in
Psychology, 7, 1076.
Gilhooly, K.J. (2018). Incubation, problem solving,
and creativity. In L.J. Ball& V.A. Thompson
(Eds.), International handbook of thin‑
king and reasoning. London: Psychology
Press.
Gilhooly, K. J., Georgiou, G. J., Garrison, J.,
Reston, J.& Sirota, M.(2012). Don’t wait to
incubate: immediate versus delayed incuba-
tion in divergent thinking. Memory&Cogni‑
tion, 40, 966-975.
Gilhooly, K. J., Georgiou, G. J., Sirota, M. &
Paphiti-Galeano, A. (2015). Incubation
and suppression processes in creative pro-
blem solving. Thinking and Reasoning, 21,
130-146.
Girotto, V.& Legrenzi, P.(1989). Mental repre-
sentation and hypothetico-deductive rea-
soning: The case of the THOG problem.
Psychological Research, 51, 129-135.
Girotto, V. & Legrenzi, P. (1993). Naming the
parents of the THOG: Mental representation
and reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Expe‑
rimental Psychology: Human Experimental
Psychology, 46A, 701-713.
Girotto, V.& Light, P.(1992). The pragmatic bases
of children’s reasoning. In P.Light&G.But-
terworth (Eds.), Context and cognition: Ways
of learning and knowing. The developing body
and mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, Inc.
Girotto, V., Mazzocco, A. & Tasso, A. (1997).
The effect of premise order in conditional
reasoning: A test of the mental model theory.
Cognition, 63, 1-28.
Glanzer, M. (1972). Storage mechanisms in
recall. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 395 27/02/2018 11:14:17

396 n Introduction à la psychologie cognitive
of learning and motivation: Advances in
research and theory (Vol. 5, pp. 129-193).
San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Glanzer, M.& Cunitz, A.R. (1966). Two storage
mechanisms in free recall. Journal of Verbal
Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 351-360
Glass, A.L.&Holyoak, K.J. (1975). Alternative
conceptions of semantic theory. Cognition,
3, 313-339.
Glaveanu, V., Lubart, T., Bonnardel, N., Botella,
M., de Biaisi, P.M, Desainte-Catherine, M.,…
& Zenasni, F. (2013). Creativity as action:
Findings from five creative domains. Fron‑
tiers in Educational Psychology, 4, 1-14.
Glöckner, A. & Betsch, T. (2008). Multiple-rea-
son decision making based on automatic
processing. Journal of Experimental Psycho‑
logy: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34,
1055-1075.
Gobet, F.(2011). Psychologie du talent et de l’ex‑
pertise. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
Gobet, F. & Clarkson, G. (2004). Chunks in
expert memory: Evidence for the magical
number four… or is it two? Memory, 12,
732-747.
Gobet, F. & Simon, H. A. (1996). The roles of
recognition processes and look-ahead search
in time-constrai- ned expert problem solving:
Evidence from grand-master-level chess. Psy‑
chological Science, 7, 52-55.
Godden, D.R.&Baddeley, A.D. (1975). Context-
dependent memory in two natural environ-
ments: On land and underwater. British
Journal of Psychology, 66, 325-331.
Goel, V. (2007). Anatomy of deductive rea-
soning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11,
435-441.
Goldstone, R. L. & Kersten, A.(2003). Concepts
and Categories. In A. F. Healy & R. W.
Proctor (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of
psychology. Vol. 4. Experimental psychology
(pp.591-621). New York: Wiley.
Gorman, M. E. (1986). How the possibility of
error affects falsification on a task that
models scientific problem solving. British
Journal of Psychology, 77, 85-96.
Gorman, M.E.&Gorman, M.E. (1984). A com-
parison of disconfirmatory, confirmatory
and control strategies on Wason’s 2-4-6 task.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psycho‑
logy: Human Experimental Psychology, 36A,
629-648.
Gorman, M.E., Gorman, M.E., Latta, R.M.&Cun-
ningham, G. (1984). How disconfirmatory,
confirmatory and combined strategies affect
group problem solving. British Journal of
Psychology, 75, 65-79.
Gorman, M. E., Stafford, A. & Gorman, M. E.
(1987). Disconfirmation and dual hypotheses
on a more difficult version of Wason’s 2-4-6
task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psy‑
chology: Human Experimental Psychology,
39(1-A), 1-28.
Graf, P.(1990). Life-span changes in implicit and
explicit memory. Bulletin of the Psychonomic
Society, 28, 353-358.
Graf, P. & Schacter, D. L. (1987). Selective
effects of interference on implicit and expli-
cit memory for new associations. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,
and Cognition, 13, 45-53.
Graf, P., Squire, L.R.&Mandler, G.(1984). The
information that amnesic patients do not for-
get. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Lear‑
ning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 164-178.
Grainger, J. (2008). Cracking the orthographic
code: An introduction. Language and Cogni‑
tive Processes, 23, 1-35.
Grainger, J.(2017). Orthographic processing: A
‘mid-level’ vision of reading. The Quarterly
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1-25. doi:
10.1080/17470218.2017.1314515
Grainger, J. & Jacobs, A. M. (1994). A dual
read-out model of word context effects in
letter perception: Further investigations of
the word superiority effect. Journal of Expe‑
rimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, 20, 1158-1176.
Grainger, J. & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthogra-
phic processing in visual word recognition:
A multiple read- out model. Psychological
Review, 103, 518-565.
Grainger, J., O’Regan, J.K., Jacobs, A.M.&Segui,
J. (1989). On the role of competing word
units in visual word recognition: The neigh-
borhood frequency effect. Perception and
Psychophysics, 45, 189-195.
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 396 27/02/2018 11:14:17

Bibliographie
n 397
Greenbaum, J. L. & Graf, P. (1989). Preschool
period development of implicit and explicit
remembering. Bulletin of the Psychonomic
Society, 27, 417-420.
Greeno, J. G. (1976). Indefinite goals in well-
structured problems. Psychological Review,
83, 479-491.
Greeno, J. G. (1978). Natures of problem-sol-
ving abilities. In W.K. Estes (Ed.), Handbook
of learning and cognitive processes (Vol. 5,
pp.239-270). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gregory, R. L. (1972). Cognitive contours.
Nature, 238 (5358), 51-52.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In
P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and
semantics: Speech acts (Vol. 3). New York:
Seminar Press.
Griggs, R.A. (1989). To « see » or not to « see »:
That is the selection task. Quarterly Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Human Experi‑
mental Psychology, 41 (3-A), 517-529.
Griggs, R.A.&Cox, J.R. (1982). The elusive thema-
tic-materials effect in Wason’s selection task.
British Journal of Psychology, 73, 407-420.
Groome, D.& Eysenck, M.(2016). An introduc‑
tion to Applied Cognitive Psychology (2nded.).
New York: Routledge, Psychology Press.
Gulya, M., Rovee-Collier, C., Gallucio, L.& Wilk,
A. (1998). Memory processing of a serial
list by young infants. Psychological Science,
9, 303-307.
Guyote, M.J.& Sternberg, R.J. (1981). A tran-
sitive-chain theory of syllogistic reasoning.
Cognitive Psychology, 13, 461-525.
Hakes, D.T. (1972). Effects of reducing comple-
ment constructions on sentence comprehen-
sion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal
Behavior, 11, 278-286.
Hakes, D.T.&Foss, D.J. (1970). Decision pro-
cesses during sentence comprehension:
Effects of surface structure reconsidered.
Perception and Psychophysics, 8, 413-416.
Harley, T. (1995). The psychology of language.
From data to theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Harman, M. & Hasher, L. (1991). Aging and
suppression: Memory for previously rele-
vant information. Psychology and Aging, 6,
584-587.
Hartley, A. A. & Anderson, J. W. (1983). Task
complexity, problem representation, and pro-
blem-solving performance by younger and
older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 38, 72-77.
Hartley, A.A.&Anderson, J.W. (1986). Instruc-
tion, induction, generation, and evaluation
of strategies for solving search problems.
Journal of Gerontology, 41, 650-658.
Hassin, R.R. (2013). Yes it can: On the functional
abilities of the human unconscious. Perspec‑
tives in Psychological Science, 8, 195-207.
Hayes, J. R. & Flower, L. S. (1986). Writing
research and the writer. American Psycholo‑
gist, 41, 1106-1113.
Haygood, R.C.&Bourne, L. E. J.(1965). Attri-
bute- and rule-learning aspects of conceptual
behavior. Psychological Review, 72, 175-195.
Hayward, W. G. & Tarr, M. J. (1997). Testing
conditions for viewpoint invariance in object
recognition. Journal of Experimental Psycho‑
logy: Human Perception and Performance, 23,
1511-1521.
Hedden, T. & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2010). Shared
and selective neural correlates of inhibition:
Facilitation and shifting processes during
executive control. NeuroImage, 51, 421-431.
Hellyer, S.(1962). Frequency of stimulus pres-
entation and short-term decrement in recall.
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 650.
Herdman, C. M. (1992). Attentional resource
demands of visual word recognition in
naming and lexical decisions. Journal of Expe‑
rimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, 18, 460-470.
Herdman, C. M. & Dobbs, A. R. (1989). Atten-
tional demands of visual word recognition.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Perception and Performance, 15, 124-132.
Heurley, L. (1997). Processing units in written
texts: Paragaphs or information blocks?
In J. Costermans & M. Fayol (Eds.), Pro‑
cessing interclausal relationships: Studies in
the production and comprehension of text
(pp. 179-200). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erl-
baum Associates.
Higham, P. A. (1998). Believing details known
to have been suggested. British Journal of
Psychology, 89, 265-283.
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 397 27/02/2018 11:14:17

398 n Introduction à la psychologie cognitive
Hirst, W. et al. (2009). Long-Term Memory for
the terrorist attack of September11: Flash-
bulb memories, event memories, and the fac-
tors that influence their retention. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: General, 138,
161-176.
Hoch, S. J. & Tschirgi, J. E. (1985). Logical
knowledge and cue redundancy in deduc-
tive reasoning. Memory and Cognition, 13,
453-462.
Hockett, C.F. (1963). The problem of univer-
sals in language. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.),
Universals of language. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Hodzik, S.& Lemaire, P.(2011). Inhibition and
shifting capacities mediate adults’ age-rela-
ted differences in strategy selection and
repertoire. Acta Psychologica, 137, 335‑344.
Hoffman, D.D. &Richards, W. A. (1984). Parts
of recognition. Cognition, 18, 65-96.
Holcomb, P.J., Grainger, J.& O’Rourke, T.(2002).
An electrophysiological study of the effects
of orthographic neighborhood size on prin-
ted word perception. Journal of Cognitive
Neuroscience, 14, 938-950.
Hollingworth, A., Maxcey-Richard,
A.M.&Vecera, S.P. (2012). The spatial distri-
bution of attention within and across objects.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Perception&Performance, 38, 135-151.
Holyoak, K. J. & Morrison, R. G. (2005). The
Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reaso‑
ning. Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Houdé, O. & Borst, G. (2015). Evidence for an
inhibitory-control theory of the reasoning
brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9,
148. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00148
Houdé, O., Zago, L., Moutier, S., Crivello, F.,
Mellet, E., Pineau, A., Mazoyer, B. & Tzou-
rio-Mazoyer, N. (2003). Can emotions help
us reason? Two positron emission tomogra-
phy (PET) studies using a training paradigm.
Brain and Cognition, 51, 233-234.
Howard, D.V. (1988). Implicit and explicit assess-
ment of cognitive aging. In M. L. Howe &
C.J. Brainerd (Eds.), Cognitive development in
adulthood: Progress in cognitive development
research. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Howard, D.V., Heisey, J.G.&Shaw, R.J. (1986).
Aging and the priming of newly learned
associations. Developmental Psychology, 22,
78-85.
Howe, M.L.&Rabinowitz, F.M. (1989). On the
uninterpretability of dual-task performance.
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47,
32-38.
Howes, D. H. & Solomon, R. L. (1951). Visual
duration threshold as a function of word-
probability. Journal of Experimental Psycho‑
logy, 41, 401-410.
Hoyer, W.J., Rebok, G.W.&Sved, S.M. (1979).
Effects of varying irrelevant information
on adult age differences in problem solving.
Journal of Gerontology, 14, 553-560.
Hubbard, T.L. (2015). The varieties of momen-
tum-like Experience. Psychological Bulletin,
141, 1081-1119.
Hummel, J.E.&Holyoak, K.J. (1997). Distribu-
ted representations of structure: A theory of
analogical access and mapping. Psychological
Review, 104, 427-466.
Hupet, M., Schelstraete, M.A., Demaeght, N.&
Fayol, M.(1996). Les erreurs d’accord sujet-
verbe en production écrite. L’Année psycho‑
logique, 96, 587-610.
Hyde, T. S. & Jenkins, J. J. (1973). Recall for
words as a function of semantic, graphic, and
syntactic orienting tasks. Journal of Verbal
Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 471-480.
Hyman, I.E., Jr., Husband, T.H. &Billings, J.F.
(1995). False memories of childhood expe-
riences. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9,
181-197.
Intraub, H. (2004). Anticipatory spatial repre-
sentation of 3D regions explored by sighted
observers and a deaf-and-blind-observer.
Cognition, 94, 19-37.
Intraub, H. (2012). Rethinking visual scene
perception. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews:
Cognitive Science, 3, 117-127.
Intraub, H.& Dickinson, C.(2008). False memory
1/20th of a second later. Psychological
Science, 19, 1007-1014.
Intraub, H., Gottesman, C. V. & Bills, A. J.
(1998). Effects of perceiving and imagining
scenes on memory for pictures. Journal of
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 398 27/02/2018 11:14:17

Bibliographie
n 399
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory
and Cognition, 24, 186-201.
Intraub, H.& Richardson, M.(1989). Wide-Angle
memories of close-Up scenes. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory
and Cognition, 15, 179-196.
Intraub, H., Morelli, F.& Gagnier, K.M. (2015).
Visual, haptic and bimodal scene perception:
Evidence for a unitary representation, Cogni‑
tion, 138, 132-147.
Jacobs, A. M. & Grainger, J. (1992). Testing a
semistochastic variant of the interactive
activation model in different word recogni-
tion experiments. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Human Perception and Perfor‑
mance, 18, 1174-1188.
Jacoby, L.L. (1978). On interpreting the effects
of repetition: Solving a problem versus
remembering a solution. Journal of Verbal
Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 649-667.
Jacoby, L.L.&Dallas, M.(1981). On the relation-
ship between autobiographical memory and
perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: General, 110, 306-340.
Janiszewski, C.& Uy, D.(2008). Precision of the
anchor influences the amount of adjustment.
Psychological Science, 19, 121-127.
Jarvella, R. J. (1971). Syntactic processing of
connected speech. Journal of Verbal Learning
and Verbal Behavior, 10, 409-416.
Johnston, W.A.&Heinz, S.P. (1978). Flexibility
and capacity demands of attention. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: General, 107,
420-435.
Johnson, E.D., Tubau, E.& De Neys, W.(2016).
The doubting System 1: Evidence for auto-
matic substitution sensitivity. Acta Psycholo‑
gica, 164, 56-64.
Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983). Mental Models. Cam-
bridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1993). The computer and
the mind (2nded.) London: Fontana.
Johnson-Laird, P.N.&Bara, B.G. (1984). Syllo-
gistic inference. Cognition, 16, 1-61.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. & Byrne, R. M. J. (1991).
Deduction. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates Ltd.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. & Steedman, M. J. (1978).
The psychology of syllogisms. Cognitive Psy‑
chology, 10, 6499.
Johnson-Laird, P.N., Khemlani, S.S.&Goodwin,
G. P. (2015). Logic, probability, and human
reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19,
201-214.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V.,
Legrenzi, M.S.&Caverni, J.P. (1999). Naive
probability: A mental model theory of exten-
sional reasoning. Psychological Review, 106,
62-88
Johnson-Laird, P. N., Legrenzi, P. & Legrenzi,
M.(1972). Reasoning and a sense of reality.
British Journal of Psychology, 63, 395-400.
Johnston, W.A.&Wilson, J.(1980). Perceptual
processing of nontargets in an attention task.
Memory&Cognition, 8, 372-377.
Just, M.A. &Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory
of reading: From eye fixations to comprehen-
sion. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354.
Just, M.A.&Carpenter, P.A. (1992). A capacity
theory of comprehension: Individual diffe-
rences in working memory. Psychological
Review, 99, 122-149.
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kahneman, D.(2002). Système 1 / Système 2: les
deux vitesses de la pensée. Paris: Flammarion.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow.
Farrar, Straus&Giroux.
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjec-
tive Probability: A judgment of Representa-
tiveness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454.
Kahneman, D.& Tversky, A.(1973). On the psy-
chology of prediction. Psychological Review,
80, 237251.
Kahneman, D.& Tversky, A.(1979). On the inter-
pretation of intuitive probability: A reply to
Jonathan Cohen. Cognition, 7, 409-411.
Kaplan, C.A.&Simon, H. A. (1990). In search
of insight. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 374-419.
Karat, J.(1982). A model of problem solving with
incomplete constraint knowledge. Cognitive
Psychology, 14, 538-559.
Katona, G. (1940), Organizing and memorizing.
New York: Columbia University Press.
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 399 27/02/2018 11:14:17

400 n Introduction à la psychologie cognitive
Keeney, R.L.&Raiffa, H.(1976). Decisions with
multiple objectives: Preferences and value
tradeoffs. New York: Cambridge University
Press.
Kellogg, R. T. (1988). Attentional overload and
writing performance: Effects of rough draft
and outline strategies. Journal of Experimen‑
tal Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cogni‑
tion, 14, 355-365.
Kellogg, R. T. (1994). The psychology of writing.
New York: Oxford University Press.
Khemlani, S.& Johnson-Laird, P.N. (2012). Theo-
ries of syllogism: A meta-analysis. Psycholo‑
gical Bulletin, 138, 422-457.
Kinchla, R.A. (1992). Attention. Annual Review
of Psychology, 43, 711-742.
Kinstch, W.(1998). Comprehension: A paradigm
for cognition. New York: Cambridge Univer-
sity Press.
Kintsch, W.& Mangalath, P.(2011) The construc-
tion of meaning. Topics in Cognitive Science,
3, 346-370.
Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of mea‑
ning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erl-
baum, Inc.
Kintsch, W.(1992). A cognitive architecture for
comprehension. In H.L. J.Pick, P.W. van den
Broek&D.C. Knill (Eds.), Cognition: Concep‑
tual and methodological issues. Washington,
D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Kintsch, W.(1994). The psychology of discourse
processing. In M.A. Gernbacher (Ed.), Hand‑
book of psycholinguistics. San Diego, CA: Aca-
demic Press, Inc.
Kintsch, W.(1998). Comprehension. A paradigm
for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer-
sity Press.
Kintsch, W.& Welsch, D.M. (1991). The construc-
tion-integration model: A framework for
studying memory for text. In W. E. Hock-
ley&S.Lewandowsky (Eds.), Relating theory
and data: Essays on human memory in honor
of Bennet B. Murdock (pp. 367-385). Hill-
sdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kintsch, W., Welsch, D., Schmalhofer, F. &
Zimny, S.(1990). Sentence memory: A theo-
retical analysis. Journal of Memory and Lan‑
guage, 29, 133-159.
Kirk, E.P. &Ashcraft, M. K. (2001). Telling sto-
ries: The perils and promise of using verbal
reports to study math strategies. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,
and Cognition, 27, 157-175.
Klauer, K. C. (2004). Double dissociations in
visual and spatial short-term memory. Jour‑
nal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133,
355-381.
Klayman, J. & Ha, Y. W. (1987). Confirma-
tion, disconfirmation, and information in
hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94,
211-228.
Klein, G.A. (2009). Sources of power: How people
make decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kohn, S. E. & Friedman, R. B. (1986). Word-
meaning deafness: A phonological-semantic
dissociation. Journal of Cognitive Neuropsy‑
chology, 3, 291-308.
Kosslyn, S.M., Ball, T.M.&Reiser, B. J. (1978).
Visual images preserve metric spatial infor-
mation: Evidence from studies of image
scanning. Journal of Experimental Psycho‑
logy: Human Perception and Performance, 4,
47-60.
Kotovsky, K.& Simon, H.A. (1973). Empirical
tests of a theory of human acquisition of
concepts for sequential patterns. Cognitive
Psychology, 4, 399-424.
Kounios, J. & Beeman, M. (2015). The Eureka
Factor: AHA Moments, Creative Insight, and
the Brain. New York, NY: Random House.
Kvavilashvili, L., Mirani, J., Schagman, S., Foley,
K. & Kornbrot, D.E. (2009). Consistency of
flashbulb memories of September 11 over
long delays: Implications for consolidation
and wrong slide hypotheses. Journal of
Memory and Language, 61, 556-572.
Lachter, J., Forster, K.I.&Ruthruff, E.(2004).
Forty-five years after broadbent (1958): Still
no identification without attention. Psycholo‑
gical Review, 111, 880-913.
Lainey, P.(2013). Psychologie de la décision. Mon-
tréal: EJD.
Largy, P., Fayol, M. & Lemaire, P. (1996). The
homophone effect in written French: The
case of verb-noun inflection errors. Language
and Cognitive Processes, 11, 217-255.
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 400 27/02/2018 11:14:17

Bibliographie
n 401
Larsen, J.D. Baddeley, A. & Andrade, J.(2000),
Phonological similarity and the irrelevant
speech effect: Implications for models of
short-term memory. Memory, 8, 145-157.
Lassaline, M.E.&Logan, G.D. (1993). Memory-
based automaticity in the discrimination of
visual numerosity. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
19, 561-581.
Lemaire, P. (2015). Vieillissement cognitif et
variations stratégiques. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
(traduction anglaise parue en 2016 chez Tay-
lor&Francis, Routledge: Psychology Press,
Cognitive Aging: The Role of Strategies).
Lemaire, P.(Eds.) (2017). Cognitive Development
from a strategy perspective. A Festschrift for
Robert Siegler. London: Routledge, Psycho-
logy Press.
Lemaire, P. (1998). Le vieillissement cognitif.
Paris: Presses universitaires de France, coll.
« Que sais-je? ».
Lemaire, P. & Arnaud, L. (2008). Young and
older adults’ strategies in complex arithme-
tic. American Journal of Psychology, 121,
1‑16.
Lemaire, P. & Bherer, L. (2005). Psychologie
du vieillissement. Une perspective cognitive.
Bruxelles: De Boeck Université.
Lemaire, P.& Fayol, M.(1995). When plausibi-
lity judgments supersede fact retrieval: The
example of the odd/even effect on product
verification. Memory&Cognition, 23, 34-48.
Lemaire, P.& Leclère, M.(2014a). Strategy repe-
tition in young and older adults: A study
in arithmetic. Developmental Psychology, 50,
460‑468.
Lemaire, P.& Leclère, M.(2014b). Strategy Selec-
tion in Alzheimer patients: A study in arith-
metic. Journal of Experimental and Clinical
Neuropsychology, 36, 507‑516.
Lemaire, P. & Reder, L. (1999). What affects
strategy selection in arithmetic? An example
of parity and five effects on product verifica-
tion. Memory&Cognition, 22, 364-382.
Lemaire, P.& Siegler, R.S. (1995). Four aspects of
strategic change: Contributions to children’s
learning of multiplication. Journal of Experi‑
mental Psychology: General, 124, 83-97.
Lemaire, P., Abdi, H. & Fayol, M. (1996). The
role of working memory resources in simple
cognitive arith- metic. European Journal of
Cognitive Psychology, 8, 73-103.
Lemaire, P., Barrett, S. E., Fayol, M. & Abdi,
H.(1994). Automatic activation of addition
and multiplication facts in elementary school
children. Journal of Experimental Child Psy‑
chology, 57, 224-258.
Levelt, W.J. M.(1989). Speaking: From intention
to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lewis, C. H. & Anderson, J. R. (1976). Interfe-
rence with real world knowledge. Cognitive
Psychology, 8, 311-335.
Lewis, M.Q.&Bartz, W.H. (1970). Learning and
the memory stores. Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 86, 465-466.
Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Fischloff, B., Layman,
M.& Combs, B.(1978). Judged frequency of
lethal events. Journal of Experimental Psy‑
chology: Human Learning and Memory, 4,
551-578.
Light, L. L. & Singh, A. (1987). Implicit and
explicit memory in young and older adults.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory, and Cognition, 13, 531-541.
Light, L.L.&Zelinski, E.M. (1983). Memory for
spatial information in young and old adults.
Developmental Psychology, 19, 901-906.
Light, L. L., Singh, A. & Capps, J. L. (1986).
Dissociation of memory and awareness in
young and older adults. Journal of Clinical
and Experimental Neuropsychology, 8, 62-74.
Lindsay, S. (2008). Source monitoring. In H. L.
Roediger (Ed.), Cognitive psychology of memory
(Vol.2, pp.325-348). Oxford: Elsevier.
Lindsay, D.S., Allen, B.P., Chan, J.C. K.& Dahl,
L. C. (2004). Eyewitness suggestibility and
source similarity: Intrusions of details from
one event into memory reports of another
event. Journal of Memory and Language, 50,
96-111.
Linton, M.(1975). Memory for real-world events.
In D.A. Norman&E.D. Rumelhart (Eds.),
Explorations in cognition (pp.376-404). San
Francisco: Freeman.
Lively, S. E., Pisoni, D. B. & Goldinger, S. D.
(1994). Spoken word recognition: Research
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 401 27/02/2018 11:14:18

402 n Introduction à la psychologie cognitive
and theory. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.),
Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp.265-301).
San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Loftus, E. F. (1974). Reconstructing memory:
The incredible eyewitness. Psychology Today,
8, 116-119.
Loftus, E.F. (1993). Desperately seeking memo-
ries of the first few years of childhood: The
reality of early memories. Journal of Experi‑
mental Psychology: General, 122, 274-277.
Loftus, E.F. &Hoffman, H.G. (1989). Misinfor-
mation and memory: The creation of new
memories. Journal of Experimental Psycho‑
logy: General, 118, 100-104.
Loftus, E.F. &Palmer, J.C. (1974). Reconstruc-
tion of automobile destruction: An example
of the interaction between language and
memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Ver‑
bal Behavior, 13, 585-589.
Loftus, E.F., Donders, K., Hoffman, H.G.&Schoo-
ler, J.W. (1989). Creating new memories that
are quickly accessed and confidently held.
Memory&Cognition, 17, 607-616.
Loftus, E.F., Miller, D.G.&Burns, H.J. (1978).
Semantic integration of verbal information
into a visual memory. Journal of Experimen‑
tal Psychology. Human Learning and Memory,
4, 19-31.
Loftus, E. F. (2007). Elizabeth F. Loftus (Auto-
biography). In G. Lindzey & M Runyan
(Eds.), History of psychology in autobiography
(Vol. IX, pp. 198-227). Washington, D.C.:
American Psychological Association Press.
Loftus, E. F., Loftus, G. R., Messo, J. (1987).
Some facts about « weapon focus ». Law and
Human Behavior, 11, 55-62.
Loftus, G.R.&Loftus, E.F. (1974). The influence
of one memory retrieval on a subsequent
memory retrieval. Memory & Cognition, 2,
467-471.
Logan, G. D. (1979). On the use of a concur-
rent memory load to measure attention and
automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psy‑
chology: Human Perception and Performance,
5, 189-207.
Logan, G.D. (1988). Toward an instance theory
of automatization. Psychological Review, 95,
492-527.
Logan, G.D. (2002). An instance theory of atten-
tion and memory. Psychological Review, 109,
376-400.
Logie, R. H. (1995). Visuo‑spatial working
memory. Hove: Erlbaum.
Logie, R.H. (2011). The functional organisation
and capacity limits of working memory. Cur‑
rent Directions in Psychological Science, 20,
840-848.
Logie, R.H.& van der Meulen, M.(2009) Frag-
menting and integrating visuo-satial working
memory. In J. R. Brockmole (Ed.), Repre‑
senting the visual world in memory. Hove:
Erlbaum.
Lovett, M.C.&Anderson, J.R. (1996). History
of success and current context in problem
solving: Combined influences on operator
selection. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 168-217.
Lubart, T. (2003). Psychologie de la créativité.
Paris: Armand Colin.
Lubart, T. (2016). The Creative Process: Pers‑
pectives from multiple domains. New York:
Palgrave Macmillan.
Lubinski, D., Schmidt, D. B. & Benbow, C. P.
(1996). A 20-year stability analysis of the
study of values for intellectually gifted indi-
viduals from adolescence to adulthood. Jour‑
nal of Applied Psychology, 81, 443-451.
Luchins, A.S. (1942). Mechanization in problem
solving: The effect of Einstellung. Psychologi‑
cal Monographs, 54 (6, Whole No.248).
Luchins, A.S.&Luchins, E.H. (1959). Rigidity
of behavior: A variational approach to the
effect of Einstellung. Eugene, OR: University
of Oregon Press.
Mackay, D. G. (1973). Aspects of the theory
of comprehension, memory and attention.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psycho‑
logy, 25, 22-40.
MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of
research on the Stroop effect: An integrative
review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
MacLeod, C. M. (1992). The Stroop task: The
« gold standard » of attentional measures.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
121, 12-14.
Maier, N.(1931). Reasoning and learning. Psycho‑
logical Review, 38, 332-346.
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 402 27/02/2018 11:14:18

Bibliographie
n 403
Mandler, G.(1980). Recognizing: The judgment of
previous occurrence. Psychological Review,
87, 252271.
Manktelow, K. (2012). Thinking and reasoning:
An introduction to the psychology of reason,
judgement and decision making. Hove: Psy-
chology Press.
Maquestiaux, F.(2012). La simultanéité des actes
psychiques: apports du protocole PRP. L’An‑
née psychologique, 112, 631-663.
Maquestiaux, F.(2017). Psychologie de l’attention
(2eéd.). Bruxelles: De Boeck Université.
Marcus, S. L. & Rips, L. J. (1979). Conditional
reasoning. Journal of Verbal Learning and
Verbal Behavior, 18, 199-223.
Margolis, H.(1987). Patterns, thinking, and cogni‑
tion: A theory of judgment. Chicago, IL: Uni-
versity of Chicago Press.
Markovits, H. & Nantel, G. (1989). The belief-
bias effect in the production and evaluation
of logical conclusions. Memory&Cognition,
17, 11-17.
Markovits, H., Schleifer, M.& Fortier, L.(1989).
Development of elementary deductive rea-
soning in young children. Developmental Psy‑
chology, 25, 787-793.
Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational inves‑
tigation into the human representation and
processing of visual information. San Fran-
cisco: Freeman.
Marr, D.& Nishihara, K.(1978). Representation
and recognition of the spatial organisation
of three dimensional shapes. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society (London),
B200, 269-294.
Marshall, S.P. (1995). Schemas in problem solving.
New York: Cambridge University Press.
Marslen-Wilson, W. & Tyler, L. K. (1980). The
temporal structure of spoken language
understanding. Cognition, 8, 1-71.
Marslen-Wilson, W.D.&Welsh, A.(1978). Pro-
cessing interactions and lexical access during
word recognition in continuous speech.
Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29-63.
Martinez, A., Anilo-Vento, L., Sereno, M.I., Frank,
L.R., Buxton, R.B., Dubowitz D. J., Wonge,
E.C., Hinrichs, H., Heinze, H.J.& Hillyard,
S. A. (1999). Involvement of striate and
extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial
attention. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 364-369.
Massaro, D.W. (1994). Psychological aspects of
speech perception: Implications for research
and theory. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.),
Handbook of psycholinguistics. San Diego,
CA: Academic Press.
Massol, S., Duñabeitia, J. A., Carreiras, M. &
Grainger, J. (2013). Evidence for letter-spe-
cific position coding mechanisms. PLoS ONE,
8, e68460.
Massol, S., Grainger, J., Dufau, S.& Holcomb, P.J.
(2010). Masked priming from orthographic
neighbors: An ERP investigation. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Perception
and Performance, 36, 162-174.
Masson, G., Proteau, L. & Mestre, D. R. (1995).
Effects of stationary and moving textured
backgrounds on the visuo-oculo-manual trac-
king in humans. Vision Research, 35, 837-852.
Mathy, F. (2012). La compression de l’infor-
mation dans l’apprentissage de catégories
artificielles. L’Année psychologique, 112,
593‑629.
Mathy, F. & Feldman, J. (2012). What’s magic
about magic numbers? Chunking and data
compression in short-term memory. Cogni‑
tion, 122, 346-362.
Mathy, F., Fartoukh, M., Gauvrit, N. & Guida,
A. (2016). Developmental abilities of chun-
king in immediate memory and its non-rela-
tionship to increases in capacity. Frontiers in
Psychology: Cognition, 7, 1-11.
Mauck B. & Dehnhardt G. (1997). Mental rota-
tion in a California sea lion (Zalophus cali-
fornianus). Journal of Experimental Biology,
200, 1309-1316.
McCalley, L. T., Bowhuis, D. G. & Juola, J. F.
(1995). Age changes in the distribution of
visual attention. Journal of Gerontology, 50B,
316-331.
McClelland, J.L. (1987). The case for interactio-
nism in language processing. In M.Coltheart
(Ed.), Attention and Performance (Vol. 12:
The psychology of reading). Hove, England
UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Assocates, Inc.
McClelland, J. L. & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981).
An interactive activation model of context
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 403 27/02/2018 11:14:18

404 n Introduction à la psychologie cognitive
effects in letter perception: I. An account
of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88,
375-407.
McCloskey, M.& Santee, J.L. (1981). Are seman-
tic memory and episodic memory distinct
systems? Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Human Learning and Memory, 7, 66-71.
McKoon, G. & Ratcliff, R. (1979). Priming in
episodic and semantic memory. Journal of
Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18,
463-480.
McKoon, G., Ratcliff, R.& Dell, G.S. (1986). A
critical evaluation of the semantic-episodic
distinction. Journal of Experimental Psycho‑
logy: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12,
295-306.
McLeod & P. (1977). A dual-task response
modality effect: Support for multiprocessor
models of attention. Quarterly Journal of
Experimental Psychology, 29, 651-667.
Ménétrier, E., Didierjean A. & Marmèche,
E. (2011). Le système visuel traite-t-il les
photographies comme des fenêtres ouvertes
sur le monde? L’Année psychologique, 111,
753-773.
Mestre, D. & Warren, W. H. (1989). Le flux
optique: son rôle lors du contrôle du déplace-
ment. / Optical flow: Its role in the control of
displacement. Psychologie française, 34, 5-11.
Metcalfe, J. & Wiebe, D. (1987). Intuition in
insight and noninsight problem solving.
Memory&Cognition, 15, 238-246.
Meulemans, T., Van der Linden, M.& Perruchet,
P.(1998). Implicit sequence learning in child-
ren. Journal of Experimental Child Psycho‑
logy, 69, 199-221.
Meyer, D. E. & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971).
Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words:
Evidence of a depen- dence between retrie-
val operations. Journal of Experimental Psy‑
chology, 90, 227-234.
Meyer, R.E. (2013). Problem solving. In D.Reisberg
(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and
reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miller, G. A. (1958). The magic number seven,
plus or minus two: Some limits on our capa-
city for processing information. Psychological
Review, 63, 81-93.
Millis, K.K.& Just, M.A. (1994). The influence
of connectives on sentence comprehen-
sion. Journal of Memory and Language, 33,
128-147.
Milner, B.(1959). The memory defect in bilateral
hippocampus lesions. Psychiatric Research
Reports, 11, 43-58.
Milner, B., Corsi, P.& Teuber, H.L. (1968). Fur-
ther analysis of the hippocampal amnesic
syndrome: fourteen year follow-Up study of
H.M. Neuropsychologia, 6, 215-234.
Miyake, A.& Friedman, N.P. (2012). The nature
and organisation of individual differences
in executive functions: Four general conclu-
sions. Current Directions in Psychological
Science, 21, 8-14.
Miyake, A.& Shah, P.(1999). Models of Working
Memory. New York, NY: Cambridge Univer-
sity Press.
Miyake, A., Friedman, N.P., Emerson, M.J., Wit-
zki, A.H., Howerter, A.& Wager, T.(2000).
The unity and diversity of executive func-
tions and their contributions to complex
« front lobe » tasks: A latent variable analy-
sis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100.
Morawetz, C., Holtz, P., Bauedwig, J., Treue,
S., Dechent, P. (2007). Split of attentional
resources in human visual cortex. Visual
Neurosicence, 24, 817-826.
Moray, N.(1959). Attention in dichotic listening:
Affective cues and the influence of instruc-
tions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psy‑
chology, 11, 56-60.
Muller, E., Hollien, H.& Murry, T.(1974). Per-
ceptual responses to infant crying: Identifica-
tion of cry types. Journal of Child Language,
1, 89-95.
Murdock, B.B.&Jr (1962). The serial position
effect of free recall. Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 64, 482-488.
Mynatt, C. R., Doherty, M. E. & Tweney, R. D.
(1977). Confirmation bias in a simulated
research environment: An experimental
study of scientific inference. Quarterly Jour‑
nal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 85-95.
Mynatt, C. R., Doherty, M. E. & Tweney, R. D.
(1978). Consequences of confirmation and
disconfirmation in a simulated research
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 404 27/02/2018 11:14:18

Bibliographie
n 405
environment. Quarterly Journal of Experi‑
mental Psychology, 30, 395-406.
Naccache, L.(2006). Le Nouvel Inconscient: Freud,
Christophe Colomb des neurosciences, Paris:
Odile Jacob.
Nairne, J. S. (Ed.) (2007), The foundations of
remembering: Essays in honor of Henry
L.Roediger, III. New York: Psychology Press.
Navon, D.(1977). Forest before trees: The prece-
dence of global features in visual perception.
Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
Navon, D.(1984). Resources: a theoretical soup
stone? Psychological Review, 91, 216-234.
Navon, D.& Gopher, D.(1979). On the economy
of the human-processing system. Psychologi‑
cal Review, 86, 214-255.
Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive Psychology. New
York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Neisser, U.(1978). Memory: What are the impor-
tant questions? In M. M. Gruneberb, P. E.
Morris&R.N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects
of memory. London: Academic Press.
Nelson, T.D. (1971). Savings and forgetting from
long-term memory. Journal of Verbal lear‑
ning and Memory, 10, 568-576.
New, B., Ferrand, L., Pallier, C. & Brysbaert,
M.(2006). Re-examining word length effects
in visual word recognition: New evidence
from the English Lexicon Project. Psychono‑
mic Bulletin&Review, 13, 45-52.
New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M. & Ferrand,
L.(2004). Lexique2: A New French Lexical
Database. Behavior Research Methods, Instru‑
ments&Computers, 36, 516-524.
Newell, A.(1973). You can’t play 20questions
with nature and win. In W. G. Chase (Ed.),
Visual information processing. New York, NJ:
Academic Press.
Newell, A. (1990). Unified Theories of Cogni‑
tion: The 1987 William James Lectures. Cam-
bridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Newell, A.& Rosenbloom, P.S. (1981). Mecha-
nisms of skill acquisition and the law of prac-
tice. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills
and their acquisition (pp.1-56). Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Newell, A. & Simon, H. A. (1961). Computer
simulation of human thinking. Science, 134
(2011), 2011-2017.
Newell, H.& Simon, H.A. (1972). Human Problem
Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prenctice-Hall.
Newell, A., Shaw, J. C. & Simon, H. A. (1958).
Elements of a theory of human problem
solving. Psychological Review, 65, 151-166.
Newell, B.R.&Shanks, D.R. (2014). Unconcious
influences on decision making: A critical
review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37,
1-64.
Nicolas, S.(1992). Hermann Ebbinghaus et l’étude
expérimentale de la mémoire humaine. L’An‑
née psychologique, 92, 527-544.
Nicolas, S.(1994). Réflexions autour du concept
de mémoire implicite. L’Année psychologique,
94, 63-79.
Nicolas, S. (2005). Wundt et la fondation en
1879 de son laboratoire. Histoire documen-
taire de la création et du développement
de l’Institut de psychologie expérimentale
de Leipzig. L’Année psychologique, 105,
133-170.
Nicolas, S. (2013). Histoire de la psychologie
(2eéd.). Paris: Dunod.
Nicolas, S.(2016). La mémoire. Paris: Dunod.
Nicolas, S. & Sanitioso, R. B. (2012). Alfred
Binet and experimental psychology at the
Sorbonne laboratory. History of Psychology,
15, 328-363.
Nisbett, R. E. & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling
more than we can know: Verbal reports on
mental processes. Psychological Review, 84,
231-259.
Nissen, M. J., Ross, J. L., Willingham, D. B.,
Mackenzie, T. B. & Schacter, D. L. (1994).
Evaluating amnesia in multiple personality
disorder. In R.M. Klein&B.K. Koane (Eds.),
Psychological concepts and dissociative disor‑
ders. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Asso-
ciates, Inc.
Northcraft, G.B.&Neale, M.A. (1987). Experts,
amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-
and-adjustment perspective on property pri-
cing decisions. Organizational Behavior and
Human Decision, 39, 84-97.
O’Brien, D.P., Braine, M.D. S.& Yang, Y.(1994).
Propositional reasoning by mental models?
Simple to refute in principle and in practice.
Psychological Review, 101, 711-724.
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 405 27/02/2018 11:14:18

406 n Introduction à la psychologie cognitive
O’Regan, J.K., Rensink, R.A.&Clark, J.J. (1999).
Change-blindness as a result of « muds-
plashes ». Nature, 398(6722), 34.
O’Regan, K. & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor
account of vision and visual consciousness.
Behaviour and Brain Sciences, 24, 939-1031.
Obusek, C.J.&Warren, R.M. (1973). Relation of
the verbal transformation and the phonemic
restoration effects. Cognitive Psychology, 5,
97-107.
Olive, T. (2014). Toward an incremental and
cascading model of writing: A review of
research on writing processes coordination.
Journal of Writing Research, 6, 173-194.
Olive T. & Barbier, M.-L. (2017a) Effects of a
structured vs linear source text on students’
note-taking strategies. Written Communica‑
tion, 17, 224-246.
Olive, T.& Barbier, M.-L. (2017b). Processing
time and cognitive effort of longhand note
taking when reading and summarizing a
structured or linear text. Written Communi‑
cation, 34, 1-23.
Olive, T. & Kellogg, R. T. (2002). Concurrent
activation of high- and low-level produc-
tion processes in written composition.
Memory&Cognition, 30, 594-600
Olive, T., Piolat, A.& Roussey, J.Y. (1997). Effort
cognitif et mobilisation des processus en pro-
duction de texte. Effet de l’habileté rédac-
tionnelle et du niveau de compétences. In
D.Mellier&A.Vom Hoffe (dir.), Attention et
contrôle cognitif: Mécanismes, développement
des habiletés et pathologies (pp.71-85). Rouen:
Publications de l’Université de Rouen.
Pachur, T. & Aebi Forrer, E. (2013). Selection
of Decision Strategies After Conscious and
Unconscious Thought. Journal of Behavioral
Decision Making, 6, 477-488. doi: 10.1002/
bdm.1780
Paivio, A.(1969). Mental imagery in associative
learning and memory. Psychological Review,
76, 241-263.
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes.
New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Paivio, A.(1978). Comparisons of mental clocks.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Perception and Performance, 4, 61-71.
Paivio, A.(1986). Mental representation. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Palmer, S. E. (1975). The effects of contextual
scenes on the identification of objects.
Memory and Cognition, 3, 519-526.
Palmeri, T. J. (1997). Exemplar similarity and
the development of automaticity. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,
and Cognition, 23, 324-354.
Pardilla-Delgado, E. & Payne, J. D. (2017). The
Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task:
A simple cognitive paradigm to investigate
false memories in the laboratory. Journal of
Visualized Experiments, 119, e54793, doi:
10.3791/54793 (2017)
Parkin, A. J. & Streete, S. (1988). Implicit and
explicit memory in young children and
adults. British Journal of Psychology, 79,
361-369.
Pashler, H.(1984). Processing stages in overlap-
ping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Perception and Performance, 10, 358-377.
Pashler, H. (1993). Dual-task interference and
elementary mental mechanisms. In D. E.
Meyer&S.Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and
Performance (Vol. 14: Synergies in experi-
mental psychology, artificial intelligence, and
cognitive neuroscience). Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in
simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological
Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
Pashler, H.(1998). The Psychology of Attention.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R. & Johnson,
E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in
decision making. Journal of Experimental Psy‑
chology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14,
534-552.
Payne, J.W., Samper, A., James Bettman, R.&
Luce, M.F. (2008). Boundary conditions on
unconscious thought in complex decision
making. Psychological Science, 19, 118-1123.
Peereman, R. & Content, A. (1995). Neighbo-
rhood size effect in naming: Lexical acti-
vation or sublexical correspondences?
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory and Cognition, 21, 409-421.
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 406 27/02/2018 11:14:18

Bibliographie
n 407
Peereman, R.& Content, A.(1997). Orthographic
and phonological neighborhoods in naming:
Not all neighbors are equally influential in
orthographic space. Journal of Memory and
Language, 37, 382-410.
Perruchet, P. & Pacteau, C. (1990). Synthetic
grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction
or explicit fragmentary knowledge? Journal
of Experimental Psychology: General, 119,
264-275.
Perruchet, P.& Vinter, A.(2002). The self-orga-
nizing consciousness. Behavioral and Brain
Sciences, 25, 297-388.
Perruchet, P., Frazier, N. & Lautrey, J. (1995).
Conceptual implicity memory: A develop-
mental study. Psychological Research, 57,
220-228.
Perruchet, P., Gallego, J.& Savy, I.(1990). A cri-
tical reappraisal of the evidence for uncons-
cious abstraction of deterministic rules in
complex experimental situations. Cognitive
Psychology, 22, 493-516.
Perruchet, P., Vinter, A. & Gallego, J. (1997).
Implicit learning shapes new conscious per-
cepts and representations. Psychonomic Bul‑
letin and Review, 4, 43-48.
Perry, C., Ziegler, J.C.&Zorzi, M.(2007). Nested
incremental modeling in the development
of computational theories: the CDP+ model
of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114,
273-315.
Perry, C., Ziegler, J.C.&Zorzi, M.(2010). Beyond
single syllables: Large-scale modeling of rea-
ding aloud with the Connectionist Dual Pro-
cess (CDP++) model. Cognitive Psychology,
61, 106-151.
Peterson, L.R.&Peterson, M.J. (1959). Short-
term retention of individual verbal items.
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58,
193-198.
Pineau, M.& Bigand, M. (1997). Effet des struc-
tures globales sur l’amorçage harmonique.
L’Année psychologique, 97, 395-408.
Pinker, S. (2009). How the Mind Works
(1997/2009). New York, NY: W. W. Nor-
ton&Company. Trad. fr. par M.-Fr.Desjeux,
Comment fonctionne l’esprit. Paris: Odile Jacob.
Piolat, A.& Pélissier, A. (1998). La rédaction de
textes. Lausanne: Delachaux&Niestlé.
Piolat, A., Lemaire, P.& Farioli, F.(1997). Stra-
tegy selection in orthographic editing. Paper
presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the
Psychonomic Society, Washington, D.C.
Piolino, P., Desgranges, B.& Eustache, F.(2000).
La mémoire autobiographique: théorie et pra‑
tique. Marseille: Solal.
Pisoni, D. B. (1978). Speech perception. In
W.K.Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and
cognitive processes (Vol.6, pp.167-234). Hill-
sdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pisoni, D. B. & Sawush, J. R. (1975). Some
stages of processing in speech perception. In
A.Cohen&S.G. Nooteboom (Eds.), Structure
and process in speech perception (pp.16-34).
Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Plaut, D.C. (1995). Double dissociation without
modularity: Evidence from connectionist
neuropsychology. Journal of Clinical and
Experimental Neuropsychology, 17, 291-321.
Poletti, C., Sleimen-Malkoun, R., Decker, L.M.,
Retornaz, F., Lemaire, P., Temprado,
J. J. (2017). Strategic variations in Fitts’
task: Comparison of healthy older adults
and cognitively impaired patients. Fron‑
tiers in Aging Neuroscience. doi:10.3389/
fnagi.2016.00334
Poletti, C., Sleimen-Malkoun, R., Temprado,
J. J. & Lemaire, P. (2015). Older and youn-
ger adults’ strategies in sensori-motor tasks:
Insights from Fitts’ pointing task. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Human Percep‑
tion&Performance, 4, 542-555.
Politzer, G. & Braine, M. D. (1991). Responses
to inconsistent premisses cannot count as
suppression of valid inferences. Cognition,
38, 103-108.
Polk, T. A. & Newell, A. (1995). Deduction as
verbal reasoning. Psychological Review, 102,
533-566.
Pollack, I. & Pickett, J. M. (1964). Intelligibility
of excerpts from fluent speech: Auditory vs.
structural context. Journal of Verbal Lear‑
ning and Verbal Behavior, 3, 79-84.
Pollard, P.& Evans, J.S. B.(1980). The influence
of logic on conditional reasoning perfor-
mance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 32, 605-624.
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 407 27/02/2018 11:14:18

408 n Introduction à la psychologie cognitive
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. The
VIIth Sir Frederic Bartlett lecture. Quarterly
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32A, 3-25.
Posner, M.I.&Snyder, C. R. (1975). Attention
and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),
Information processing and cognition. Hill-
sdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Postman, L. & Phillips, L. W. (1965). Short-
term temporal changes in free recall. Quar‑
terly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17,
132-138.
Postman, L. & Underwood, B. J. (1973). Cri-
tical issues in interference theory.
Memory&Cognition, 1(1), 19-40.
Power, M.(1985). Sentence Production and wor-
king memory. Quarterly Journal of Experi‑
mental Psychology, 37A, 371-382.
Prabhakaran, V., Smith, J. E., Desmond, J. E.,
Glover, G.H.&Gabrieli, J.D. E.(1997). Neu-
ral substrates of fluid reasoning: An fMRI
study of neocortical activation during per-
formance of the Raven Progressive Matrices
test. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 43-63.
Prado, J., Chadha, A. & Booth, J. R. (2011).
The brain network for deductive reasoning:
A Quantitative meta-analysis of 28 neuroi-
maging studies. Journal of Cognitive Neuros‑
cience, 23, 3483-3497.
Prado, J., Mutreja, R.& Booth, J.R.(2013). Frac-
tionating the neural substrates of transitive
reasoning: task-dependent contributions of
spatial and verbal representations. Cerebral
Cortex, 23, 499-507.
Premack, D.(1976). Intelligence in ape and man.
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Pressley, M., Cariglia, B.T., Deane, S.& Schnei-
der, W.(1987). Short-term memory, verbal
competence, and age as predictors of ima-
gery instructional effectiveness. Journal of
Experimental Child Psychology, 43, 194-211.
Pressley, M., McDaniel, M. A., Turnure, J. E.,
Wood, E.& Amhad, M.(1987). Generation
and precision of elaboration: Effects on
intentional and incidental learning. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,
and Cognition, 13, 291-300.
Prull, M.W. & Yockelson, M.B. (2013). Adult
age-related differences in the misinformation
effect for context-consistent and context-
inconsistent objects. Applied Cognitive Psy‑
chology, 27, 384-395.
Puckett, J. M. & Stockburger, D. W. (1988).
Absence of age-related proneness to short-
term retroactive interference in the absence of
rehearsal. Psychology and Aging, 3, 324-347.
Pyc, M.A.&Rawson, K.A. (2009). Testing the
retrieval effort hypothesis: Does great diffi-
culty correctly recalling information lead do
higher levels of memory? Journal of Memory
and Language, 50, 437-447.
Pyc, M.A.&Rawson, K.A. (2012). Why is test-
restudy practice beneficial for memory? An
evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory, and Cognition, 38, 737-746.
Raven, J. C. (1951). Guide to using progressive
matrices (1947), Sets A, Ab, B. London:
Lewis.
Rayner, K.et al. (1981). Masking of foveal and
parafoveal vision during eye fixations in
reading. Journal of Experimental Psycho‑
logy: Human Perception and Performance, 7,
167-179.
Rayner, K.& Pollatsek, A.(1989). The psychology
of reading. London: Prentice-Hall.
Rayner, K. & Sereno, S. C. (1994). Eye move-
ments in reading: Psycholinguistic studies.
In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of
psycholinguistics. San Diego, CA: Academic
Press.
Rayner, K., Carlson, M.& Frazier, L.(1983). The
interaction of syntax and semantics during
sentence processing: Eye movements in the
analysis of semantically biased sentences.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Beha‑
vior, 22, 358-374.
Rayner, K., Well, A. D. & Pollatsek, A. (1980).
Asymmetry of the effective visual field in
reading. Perception and Psychophysics, 27,
537-544.
Reed, S. K., Ernst, G. W.& Banerji, R. (1974).
The role of analogy in transfer between simi-
lar problem states. Cognitive Psychology, 6,
436-450.
Reeves, L. M. & Weisberg, R. W. (1994). The
role of content and abstract information in
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 408 27/02/2018 11:14:18

Bibliographie
n 409
analogical transfer. Psychological Bulletin,
101, 381-399.
Reichle, E. D., Carpenter, P. A. & Just, M. A.
(2000). The neural bases of strategy and skill
in sentence-picture verification. Cognitive
Psychology, 40, 261-295.
Reingold, E. M., Charness, N., Schultetus,
R. S. & Stampe, D. M. (2001). Perceptual
automaticity in expert chess players: Paral-
lel encoding of chess relations. Psychonomic
Bulletin and Review, 8, 504-510.
Reiser, B.J., Black, J.B.&Abelson, R.P. (1985).
Knowledge structures in the organization
and retrieval of autobiographical memories.
Cognitive Psychology, 17, 89-137.
Reitman, J. S. (1974). Without surreptitious
rehearsal, information in short-term
memory decays. Journal of Verbal Learning
and Verbal Behavior, 13, 365-377.
Reitman, W. (1964). Heuristic decision proce-
dures, open constraints, and the structure
of ill-defined pro- blems. In M. W. Shel-
ley &G.L. Bryan (Eds.), Human judgments
and optimality. New York, NJ: Wiley.
Remez, R. E. (1994). A guide to research on
the perception of speech. In M. A. Gerns-
bacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics
(pp.145-172). New York: Academic Press.
Revlis, R.(1975). Two models of syllogistic rea-
soning: Feature selection and conversion.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Beha‑
vior, 14, 180-195.
Rey, A., Goldstein, R.M.&Perruchet, P.(2009).
Does unconscious thought improve complex
decision making? Psychological Research, 73,
372-379.
Richard, J.-F. (1995). Les activités mentales:
comprendre, raisonner, trouver des solutions.
Paris: Armand Colin.
Richard, J.F., Poitrenaud, S.& Tijus, C.A. (1993).
Problem-solving restructuration: Elimina-
tion of implicit constraints. Cognitive Science,
17, 497-529.
Richardson-Klavehn, A. & Bjork, R. A. (1988).
Measures of memory. Annual Review of Psy‑
chology, 39, 475-543.
Rickard, T.C. (1997). Bending the power struc-
turation theory of strategy shifts and the
automatization of cognitive skills. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: General, 126,
288-311.
Rijlaarsdam, G. (Ed.) (2002), Studies in Writing.
Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Rimmele, U., Davachi, L.& Phelps, E.A. (2012).
Memory for time and place contributes to
enhanced confidence in memories for emo-
tional events. Emotion, 12, 834-846.
Rips, L.J. (1983). Cognitive processes in propo-
sitional reasoning. Psychological Review, 90,
38-71.
Rips, L.J. (1990). Reasoning. Annual Review of
Psychology, 41, 321-353.
Rips, L. J. (1994). The psychology of proof:
Deductive reasoning in human thinking.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Robbins, T., Anderson, E., Barker, D., Bradley,
A., Fearneyhough, C. Henson, R. & Hud-
son, S.R. (1996). Working memory in chess.
Memory&Cognition, 24, 83-93.
Robert, M. (1993). Absence of a gender diffe-
rence in a haptic version of the water-level
task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31,
57-60.
Robert, M. (1996). The gender difference in
orienting liquid surfaces and plum-lines: Its
robustness, its correlates, and the associated
knowledge of simple physics. Canadian Jour‑
nal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 280-314.
Robert, M. & Tremblay, S. (1992). Gender dif-
ferences in water-level representation as a
function of information on state of liquid.
Journal of Genetic Psychology, 153, 231-235.
Roediger, H.L. (1990). Implicit memory: Reten-
tion without remembering. American Psy‑
chologist, 45, 1043-1056.
Roediger, H.L.&McDermott, K.B. (1995). Crea-
ting false memories: Remembering words
not presented in lists. Journal of Experimen‑
tal Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cogni‑
tion, 21, 803-814.
Roediger, H. L. & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-
enhanced learning: Taking memory tests
enhances improves long-term retention. Psy‑
chological Science, 17, 249-255.
Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive
Psychology, 4, 328-350.
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 409 27/02/2018 11:14:18

410 n Introduction à la psychologie cognitive
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive reference points.
Cognitive Psychology, 7, 532-547.
Rosch, E.E.&Lloyd, B.B. E.(1978). Cognition
and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Rosch, E.& Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resem-
blances: Studies in the internal structure of
categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605.
Rose, N. S. & Craik, F. I. (2012). A processing
approach to the working memory/long-
term memory distinction: Evidence from
the levels-of-processing span task. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,
and Cognition, 38, 1019-1029.
Rosen, V. M. & Engle, R. W. (1997). The role
of working memory capacity in retrieval.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
126, 211-227.
Rossi, S. & Van der Henst, J. B. (Eds.) (2007).
Psychologies du raisonnement. Bruxelles: De
Boeck.
Rossi, S., Caverni, J. P. & Girotto, V. (2001).
Hypothesis testing in a rule discovery pro-
blem: When a focused procedure is effective.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psycho-
logy A, 54, 263-267.
Rossi, S., Cassotti, M., Moutier, S., Delcroix, N.&
Houdé, O.(2015). Helping reasoners succeed
in the Wason selection task: When execu-
tive learning discourages heuristic response
but not necessarily encourages logic. PloS
ONE, 10: e0123024. doi: 10.1371/journal.
pone.0123024
Rozencwajg, P., Cherfi, M., Ferrandez, A. M.,
Lautrey, J.Lemoine, C.& Loarer, E. (2005).
Age-related changes in the strategies used
by middle aged adults to solve a block design
task. The International Journal of Aging and
Human Development, 50, 159-182.
Rumelhart, D. E. & Siple, P. (1974). Process
of recognizing tachistoscopically presented
words. Psychological Review, 81, 99-118.
Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L. & Group,
T.P. R.(Eds.) (1986). Parallel distributed pro‑
cessing: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press.
Rundus, D.& Atkinson, R. C. (1970). Rehearsal
processes in free recall: A procedure for
direct observation. Journal of Verbal Lear‑
ning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 99-105.
Ruthruff, E., Allen, P.A., Lien, M.C.&Grabbe,
J. (2008). Visual word recognition without
central attention: Evidence for greater auto-
maticity with greater reading ability. Psycho‑
nomic Bulletin&Review, 15, 337-343.
Sabramaniam, K., Kounios, J., Parrish, T.B.&Jung-
Beeman, M. (2009). A brain mechanism for
facilitation of insight by positive affect. Jour‑
nal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 415-432.
Sachs, J.S. (1967). Recopition memory for syn-
tactic and semantic aspects of connected
discourse. Perception & Psychophysics, 2,
437-442.
Salame, P. & Baddeley, A. D. (1982). Disrup-
tion of short-term memory by unattended
speech: Implications for the structure of
working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning
and Verbal Behavior, 21, 150-164.
Salthouse, T.A.&Prill, K.A. (1987). Inferences
about age impairments in inferential reaso-
ning. Psychology and Aging, 2, 43-51.
Salvi, C., Bricolo, E., Franconeri, S. L., Kounios,
J. & Beeman, M. (2015). Sudden insight is
associated with shutting out visual inputs.
Psychonomic Bulletin&Review, 1-6.
Salvi, C., Bricolo, E., Kounios, J., Bowden, E. &
Beeman, M.(2016). Insight solutions are cor-
rect more often than analytic solutions. Thin‑
king and Reasoning, 22, 443-460.
Samuels, A. B. (1981). Phonemic restoration:
Insights from a new methodology. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: General, 110,
474-494.
Saufley, W. H., Otaka, S. R. & Bavaresco, J.L.
(1985). Context effects: Classroom tests and
context independence. Memory& Cognition,
13, 522-528.
Sausset, S., Lambert, E.& Olive, T.(2013). Flexi-
bility of orthographic and graphomotor
coordination during a handwritten copy
task: effect of time pressure. Frontiers in
Psychology, 4, 866.
Savage, L.J. (1954). The foundations of statistics.
New York, NJ: Wiley.
Savage-Raumbagh, S., McDonald, K., Sevcik,
R. A., Hopkins, W. D. & Rubert, E. (1986).
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 410 27/02/2018 11:14:18

Bibliographie
n 411
Spontaneous symbol acquisition and com-
municative use by pygmy chimpanzees (Pan
Paniscus). Journal of Experimental Psycho‑
logy: General, 115, 211-235.
Schacter, D. L. & Tubing, E. (1994). Memory
systems. Cambridge: MIT Press. Trad. fr. par
B. Deweer, Systèmes de mémoire chez l’ani‑
mal et chez l’homme, Marseille: Solal, 1996.
Schacter, D.L. (1987). Implicit memory: History
and current status. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
13, 501-518.
Schaeken, W., De Vooght, G., Vandierendonck,
A.& d’Ydewalle, G.(Eds.) (2014), Deductive
reasoning and strategies. Hove: Psychology
Press.
Schank, R. (1999). Dynamic Memory Revisited.
Cambridge University Press.
Schank, R. C. & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts,
plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry
into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schneider, W.& Shiffrin, R.M. (1977). Control-
led and automatic human information pro-
cessing: I. Detection, search, and attention.
Psychological Review, 84, 1-66.
Schooler, J.W. (2011). Introspecting in the spirit
of William James: comment on Fox, Ericsson,
and Best (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 137,
345-350.
Schooler, J.W.&Engstler-Schooler, T.Y. (1990).
Verbal overshadowing of visual memories:
Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive
Psychology, 22, 36-71.
Schooler, J.W., Ohlsson, S.& Brooks, K.(1993).
Thoughts beyond words: When language
overshadows insight. Journal of Experimen‑
tal Psychology: General, 122, 166-183.
Schott-Bourget, V. (1994). Approches de la lin‑
guistique. Paris: Nathan.
Schunn, C.D.&Dunbar, K.(1996). Primary, ana-
logy, and awareness in complex reasoning.
Memory&Cognition, 24, 271-284.
Schweppe, J., Grice, M. & Rumer, R. (2011).
What models of verbal working memory can
learn from phonoloigcal theory: Decompo-
sing the phonological similarity effect. Jour‑
nal of Memory and Language, 64, 256-269.
Searle, J.R. (1979). Experession and meaning: Stu‑
dies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge,
UK: Cambridge University Press.
Segal, E.(2004). Incubation in insight problem sol-
ving. Creative Research Journal, 16, 141-148.
Seidenberg, M.(2017). Language at the speed of
sight. How we read, why so many can’t, and
what can be done about it. New York: Basic
Books.
Seidenberg, M. S. & McClelland, J. L. (1989).
A distributed, developmental model of
word recognition and naming. Psychological
Review, 96, 523-568.
Shallice, T.(1988). From neuropsychology to men‑
tal structure. New York: Cambridge Univer-
sity Press.
Shallice, T. & Cooper, R. P. (2011). The organi‑
sation of mind. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Sharot, T., Martorella, E. A., Delgado,
M.R.&Phelps, E.A. (2012). How personal
experience modulates the neural circuitry
of memories of September 11. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences, 104,
389-394.
Shepard, R.N.&Metzler, J.(1971). Mental rota-
tion of three-dimensional objects. Science,
171 (3972), 701-703.
Siegler, R.S. (1998). Children’s thinking (3ded.).
Upper Saddler River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Siegler, R. S. & Lemaire, P. (1997). Older and
younger adults’ strategy choices in multi-
plication: Testing predictions of ASCM
using the choice/no-choice method. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: General, 126,
71-92.
Siegler, R. S. & McGilly, K. (1989). Strategy
choices in children’s time-telling. In
I.Levin&D.Zakay (Eds.), Time and human
cognition: A life‑span perspective. Amster-
dam, Netherlands: North-Holland.
Siegler, R. S., Adolph, K. & Lemaire, P. (1997).
Strategy choices across life-span. In L.Reder
(Ed.), Implicit Memory and Metacognition
(pp.79-122). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
Simon, H.(1955). A behavioural model of ratio-
nal choice. The Quarterly Journal of Econo-
mics, 69, 99-118.
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 411 27/02/2018 11:14:18

412 n Introduction à la psychologie cognitive
Simon, H. (1992). What is an explanation of
behavior. Psychological Science, 3, 150-161.
Simon, H.A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial.
(3ded.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Simon, H.A. &Hayes, J.R. (1976). The unders-
tanding process: Problem isomorphs. Cogni‑
tive Psychology, 8, 165-190.
Simon, H. A. & Kotovsky, K. (1963). Human
acquisition of concepts for sequential pat-
terns. Psychological Review, 70, 534-556.
Simons, D. J., Rensink, R. A. (2005). Change
blindness: past, present, and future. Trends
in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 16-20.
Simonson, I. & Drolet, A. (2004). Anchoring
effects on consumers’ willingness-to-pay and
willingness-to-accept. Journal of Consumer
Research, 31, 681-690.
Sio, U.N.&Ormerod, T.C. (2009). Does incuba-
tion enhance problem solving? A meta-analy-
tic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 94-120.
Sitler, R.W., Schiavetti, N.& Metz, D. E. (1983).
Contextual effects in the measurement of hea-
ring-impai- red speakers’ intelligibility. Journal
of Speech and Hearing Research, 26, 30-35.
Slamecka, N.J.&Graf, P.(1978). The generation
effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning
and Memory, 4, 592-604.
Slowiaczek, L. M., Klayman, J., Sherman, S. J.
& Skov, R. B. (1992). Information selection
and use in hypothesis testing: What is a
good question, and what is a good answer?
Memory&Cognition, 20, 392-405.
Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J. & Rips, L.J. (1974).
Structure and process in semantic memory:
A featural model for semantic decisions. Psy‑
chological Review, 81, 214-241.
Smith, S.M., Glenberg, A.& Bjork, R.A. (1978).
Environmental context and human memory.
Memory&Cognition, 6, 342-353.
Snowdon, C. T. (2017). Learning from monkey
« talk ». Science, 355, 6330.
Spencer, R. M. & Weisberg, R. W. (1986).
Context-dependent effects on analogical
transfer. Memory&Cognition, 14, 442-449.
Sperber, D., Cara, F.& Girotto, V.(1995). Rele-
vance theory explains the selection task.
Cognition, 57, 31-95.
Sperling, G. (1960). The information available
in brief visual presentations. Psychological
Monographs: General and Applied, 74, 11,
Whole No.498.
Spinelli, E.& Ferrand, L.(2005). Psychologie du
langage écrit et parlé: du signal à la significa-
tion. Paris: Armand Colin, coll. « Cursus ».
Squire, L. R. & Zola, S. M. (1998). Episodic
memory, semantic memory, and amnesia.
Hippocampus, 8, 205-211.
Squire, L.R., Knowlton, B.& Musen, G. (1993).
The structure and organisation of memory.
Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 453-493.
Squire, L.R.&Kandel, E.(2009). Memory: From
mind to molecules (2d ed.). Greenwood Vil-
lage: Roberts&Company.
Squire, L.R.&Wixed, J.T. (2011). The cognitive
neuroscience of human memory since H.M.
Annual Review of Neuroscience, 34, 259-288.
Stanovich, K.E. (2012). On the distinction between
rationality and intelligence: Implications for
understanding individual differences in rea-
soning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrisson
(2012). The Oxford handbook of thinking and
reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Staudenmayer, H.(1975). Understanding condi-
tional reasoning with meaningful propo-
sitions. In R. J. Falmagne (Ed.), Reasoning:
Representation and Process in Children and
Adults. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stefaniak, N.& Meulemans, T.(2011). L’appren-
tissage de nouvelles informations séman-
tiques par les patients amnésiques: Une
revue de la littérature. L’Année psycholo‑
gique, 111, 577-610.
Stein, B.S.&Bransford, J.D. (1979). Constraints
on effective elaboration: Effects of precision
and subject generation. Journal of Verbal
Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 769-777.
Stemberger, J. P. (1982). Syntactic errors in
speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,
11, 313-345.
Stenning, K.& Oberlander, J.(1995). A cognitive
theory of graphical and linguistic reasoning:
Logic and implementation. Cognitive Science,
19, 97-140.
Sternberg, R. J. & Frensch, P. A. (Eds.) (1991).
Complex problem solving: Principles and
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 412 27/02/2018 11:14:19

Bibliographie
n 413
mechanisms. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erl-
baum Associates.
Sternberg, R.J. &Kalmar, D.(1998). When will
the milk spoil? Everyday induction in human
intelligence. Intelligence, 25, 185-203.
Sternberg, R.J.&Frensch, P.A. (1991). Complex
problem solving: Principles and mechanisms.
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sternberg, R. J. & Gardner, M. K. (1982). A
componential interpretation of the general
factor in human intelligence. In H.J.Eysenck
(Ed.), A model for intelligence. Berlin:
Springer-Verlag.
Sternberg, S.(1969). The discovery of processing
stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. Acta
Psychologica, Amsterdam, 30, 276-315.
Sternberg, S.(1975). Memory scanning: New fin-
dings and current controversies. Quarterly
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 1-32.
Stewart, N.(2009). The cost of anchoring on cre-
dit-card minimum repayments. Psychological
Science, 20, 39-41.
Stich, K.P., Dehnahardt, G.& Mauck, B.(2002).
Mental rotation of perspective stimuli in a
California sea Lion (Zalophus californianus).
Brain, Behavior, and Evolution, 61, 101-12.
Strick, M., Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M.W., Sjoerdma,
A., van Baaren, R.B.&Nordgren, L.F. (2011).
A meta-analysis on unconscious thought
effects. Social Cognition, 29, 738-762
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in
serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimen‑
tal Psychology, 18, 643-662.
Sullivan, L.(1976). Selective attention and secon-
dary message analysis: A reconsideration of
Broadbent’s filter model of selective atten-
tion. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psy‑
chology, 28, 167-178.
Sunstein, C. R. & Thaler, R. (2016). The two
friends who changed how we think about
how we think. The New Yorker.
Taillan, J., Ardiale, E., Anton, J.-L., Nazarian,
B., Félician, O. & Lemaire, P. (2015). Pro-
cesses in arithmetic strategy selection: A
fMRI study. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi:
10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00061
Taillan, J., Ardiale, E.& Lemaire, P.(2015). Rela-
tionships between strategy switching and
strategy switch costs in young and older
adults. A study in arithmetic problem solving.
Experimental Aging Research, 41, 136-156.
Talarico, J.M.&Rubin, D.C. (2003). Confidence,
not consistency, characterizes flashbulb
memories. Psychological Science, 14, 455-61.
Tapiero, I.(2007). Situation models and levels of
coherence: Toward a definition of comprehen‑
sion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass/
Taylor and Francis Group.
Tapiero, I. & Denhiere, G. (1995). Simulating
recall and recognition by using Kintsch’s
construction-integration model. In C. A.
I.Weaver&S.Mannes (Eds.), Discourse com‑
prehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch.
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,
Inc.
Taplin, J. E. (1971). Reasoning with conditional
sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and
Verbal Behavior, 10, 219-225.
Taraban, R. & McClelland, J. L. (1988). Consti-
tuent attachment and thematic role assi-
gnment in sentence processing: Influences
of content-based expectations. Journal of
Memory and Language, 27, 597-632.
Tarr, M.J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize
them: A case study on the role of view-
point dependency in the recognition of three-
dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin
and Review, 2, 55-82.
Tarr, M.J.&Buelthoff, H.H. (1995). Is human
object recognition better described by geon
structural descriptions or by multiple views?
Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein
(1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Human Perception and Performance, 21,
1494-1505.
Tarr, M. J. & Pinker, S. (1991). Orientation-
dependent mechanisms in shape recogni-
tion: Further issues. Psychological Science,
2, 207-209.
Terrace, H. S., Petitto, L. A., Sanders,
R.J.&Bever, T.G. (1979). Can an ape create
a sentence? Science, 206 (4421), 891-902.
Thevenot, C., Barrouillet, P., Castel, C.& Uitten-
hove, K. (2016). Ten-year-old children stra-
tegies in mental addition: A counting model
account. Cognition, 146, 48-57.
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 413 27/02/2018 11:14:19

414 n Introduction à la psychologie cognitive
Thevenot, C., Castel, C., Fanget, M. & Fayol,
M. (2010). Mental subtraction in high and
lower-skilled arithmetic problem solvers: Ver-
bal report vs. operand- recognition paradigms.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1242-1255.
Thiry, P. (1996). Notions de logique (2e éd.).
Bruxelles: De Boeck Université.
Thomas, C.& Didierjean, A. (2016). Magicians
fix your mind: How unlikely solutions block
obvious ones. Cognition, 154, 169-173.
Thomas, C., Didierjean, A., Maquestiaux, F.&
Gygax, P.(2015). Does Magic Offer a Cryp-
tozoology Ground for Psychology? Review of
General Psychology, 19, 117-128.
Thompson, D.M. (1972). Cortex effects on reco-
gnition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning
and Verbal Behavior, 11, 497-511.
Tomasello, M.& Call, J.(1997). Primate cognition.
New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Topolinski, S. & Reber, R. (2010). Gaining
Insight Into the ‘Aha’ Experience. Cur‑
rent Directions in Psychological Science, 14,
402-405.
Townsend, D. J. & Bever, T. G. (1982). Natu-
ral units of representation interact during
sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal
Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 688-703.
Trabasso, T. & Stein, N. (1995). Explanatory
inferences and other strategies during com-
prehension: Encoding effects on recall. In
R.Lorch&E.O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of cohe‑
rence in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Trabasso, T., van den Broek, P.& Suh, S.(1989).
Logical necessity and transitivity of causal
relations in stories. Discourse Processes, 12,
1-25.
Traxler, M. J., Bybee, M. D. & Pickering, M. J.
(1997). Influence of connectives on language
comprehension: Eye-tracking evidence for
incremental interpretation. Quarterly Jour‑
nal of Experimental Psychology: Human Expe‑
rimental Psychology, 50A, 481-497.
Treisman, A.M. (1960). Contextual cues in selec-
tive listening. Quarterly Journal of Experi‑
mental Psychology, 12, 242-248.
Treisman, A.M. (1964a). Monitoring and storage
of irrelevant messages in selective attention.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Beha‑
vior, 3, 449-459.
Treisman, A.M. (1964b). Verbal cues, language,
and meaning in selective attention. American
Journal of Psychology, 77, 206-219.
Treisman, A.& Gelade, G.(1980). A feature-inte-
gration theory of attention. Cognitive Psycho‑
logy, 12, 97-136.
Tulving E (2002). Episodic memory: from mind to
brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 1-25.
Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic
memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson
(Eds.), Organisation of memory. London: Aca-
demic Press.
Tulving, E.(1983). Elements of episodic memory.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory sys-
tems are there? American Psychologist, 40,
385-398.
Tulving, E. & Pearlstone, Z. (1966). Availabi-
lity versus accessibility of information in
memory for words. Journal of Verbal Lear‑
ning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 381-391.
Tulving, E. & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Enco-
ding specificity and retrieval processes in
episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80,
359-380.
Tulving, E., Mandler, G. & Baumal, R. (1964).
Interaction of two sources of information in
tachistoscopic word recognition. Canadian
Journal of Psychology, 18, 62-71.
Turner, M.L.&Engle, R.W. (1989). Is working
memory capacity task dependent? Journal of
Memory and Language, 28, 127-154.
Tversky, A. (1972). Elimination by aspects: A
theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79,
281-299.
Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psy‑
chological Review, 84, 327-352.
Tversky, A.& Gati, I.(1982). Similarity, separa-
bility, and the triangle inequality. Psychologi‑
cal Review, 89, 123-154.
Tversky, A.& et Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in
the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulle‑
tin, 76, 105-110.
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availabi-
lity: A heuristic for judging frequency and
probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232.
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 414 27/02/2018 11:14:19

Bibliographie
n 415
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment
under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.
Science, 185 (4157), 1124-1131.
Tversky, A.& Kahneman, D.(1981). The framing
of decisions and the psychology of choice.
Science, 211 (4481), 453-458.
Tversky, A.& Kahneman, D.(1983). Extensional
versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction
fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological
Review, 90, 293-315.
Tversky, A., Sattath, S. & Slovic, P. (1988).
Contingent weighting in judgment and
choice. Psychological Review, 95, 371-384.
Tweney, R. D., Doherty, M. E., Worner, W. J.,
Pliske, D. B., Mynatt, C. R., Gross, K. A. &
Arkkelin, D.L. (1980). Strategies for rule dis-
covery in an inference task. Quarterly Journal
of Experimental psychology, 32, 109-123.
Tweney, R. D., Doherty, M. E., Mynatt, C. R.
(1981). On Scientific Thinking. New York:
Columbia University Press.
Tyler, L.K.&Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (1977). The
on-line effects of semantic context on syntac-
tic processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and
Verbal Behavior, 16, 683-692.
Underwood, B.J. (1957). Interference and forget-
ting. Psychological Review, 64, 49-60.
Underwood, B. J. (1975). Individual differences
as a crucible in theory construction. Ameri‑
can Psychologist, 30, 128-134.
Underwood, B. J. & Schulz, R. W. (1960). Res-
ponse dominance and rate of learning paired
associates. Journal of General Psychology, 62,
153-158.
Van den Broek, P. & Lorch, R. F. (1993).
Network representations of causal relations
in memory for narrative texts: Evidence
from primed recognition. Discourse Processes,
16, 75-98.
Vauclair, J. (1996). Animal Cognition: Recent
Developments in modern Comparative Psy-
chology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer-
sity Press.
Vauclair, J.(2016). Psychologie comparée: Cogni‑
tion, communication et langage. Paris: Presses
universitaires de Paris Ouest.
Vauclair, J., Fagot, J. & Hopkins, W. D. (1993).
Rotation of mental images in baboons when
the visual input is directed to the left cere-
bral hemisphere. Psychological Science, 4,
99-103.
Vergauwe, E., Barrouillet, P.& Camos, V.(2009).
Visual and spatial working memory are not
dissociated after all: A time-based resource
sharing account. Journal of Experimental Psy‑
chology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35,
1012-1028.
Versace, R., Nevers, B.& Padovan, C.(2002). La
mémoire dans tous ses états. Marseille: Solal.
Vinson, N. G. & Reed, C. L. (2002). Sources
of object-specific effects in representational
momentum. Visual Cognition, 9, 41-65.
Vo, M.L.-H.& Wolfe, J.M. (2012). When does
repeated search in scenes involve memory?
Lokking at versus looking for objects in
scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Human Perception&Performance, 38, 23-41.
von Neumann, John & Oskar Morgenstern.
(1944). Theory of Games and Economic Beha‑
vior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Voss, J.F., Greene, T.R., Post, T.A.&Penner,
B. C. (1983). Problem solving skill in social
sciences. In G. Power (Ed.), The psychology
of learning and motivation: Advances in
research and theory (Vol. 17). New York:
Academic Press.
Voss, J.F., Tyler, S.W.&Yengo, L.A. (1983). Indi-
vidual differences in solving of social science
problems. In R. F. Dillon & R. R. Schmeck
(Eds.), Individual differences in cognition
(pp.205-232). New York: Academic Press.
Wade, K. A., Garry, M., Read, J. D.&Lindsay,
D.S. (2002). A picture is worth a thousand
lies: Using false photographs to create false
childhood memories. Psychonomic Bulle‑
tin&Review, 9, 597-603.
Wade, N. J. & Swanston, M. T. (2013). Visual
perception: An introduction (3d ed.). Hove:
Psychology Press.
Wagenaar, W.A. (1986). My memory: A study
of autobiographical memory over six years.
Cognitive Psychology, 18, 225-252.
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. London:
Jonathan Cape
Waroquier, L., Abadie, M., Klein, O.& Cleeremans,
A.(2014). The effect of the cognitive demands
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 415 27/02/2018 11:14:19

416 n Introduction à la psychologie cognitive
of the distraction task on unconscious
thought. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37,
44-45.
Warren, P. & Marslen-Wilson, W. W. (1987).
Continuous uptake of acoustic cues in spo-
ken word recognition. Perception and Psycho‑
physics, 41, 262-275.
Warren, R.M. (1970). Perceptual restoration of
missing speech sounds. Science, 167 (3917),
392-393.
Warren, R. M. & Obusek, C. J. (1971). Speech
perception and phonemic restorations. Per‑
ception and Psychophysics, 9, 358-362.
Warren, R.M.&Warren, R.P. (1970). Auditory
illusions and confusions. Scientific American,
223, 3036.
Warren, W. H., Mestre, D. R., Blackwell,
A.W.&Morris, M.W. (1991). Perception of
circular heading from optical flow. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Perception
and Performance, 17, 28-43.
Warren, W. H., Morris, M. W. & Kalish,
M. (1988). Perception of translational hea-
ding from optical flow. Journal of Experi‑
mental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, 14, 646-660.
Warrington, E.K.&Shallice, T.(1984). Category
specific semantic impairments. Brain, 107,
829-854
Wason, P. C. (1968). Reasoning about a rule.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psycho‑
logy, 20, 273-281.
Wason, P. C. (1969). Regression in reasoning?
British Journal of Psychology, 60, 471-480.
Wason, P.C.&Golding, E.(1974). The language
of inconsistency. British Journal of Psycho‑
logy, 65, 537546.
Wason, P. C. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1970).
A conflict between selecting and evaluating
information in an inferential task. British
Journal of Psychology, 61, 509-515.
Wason, P.C.&Shapiro, D.(1971). Natural and
contrived experience in a reasoning pro-
blem. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psy‑
chology, 23, 63-71.
Watkins, M. J. & Tulving, E. (1975). Episodic
memory: When recognition fails. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 5-29.
Watkins, M.J., Peynircioglu, Z.F.&Brems, D.J.
(1984). Pictorial rehearsal. Memory&Cogni‑
tion, 12, 553-557.
Waugh, N.C. &Norman, D.A. (1965). Primary
memory. Psychological Review, 72, 89-104.
Weil-Barais, A. (1993). L’homme cognitif. Paris:
Presses universitaires de France.
Weisberg, R. W. (2017). Problem Solving. In
L. J. Ball &V. A. Thompson (Eds.) (2017).
International handbook of thinking and rea‑
soning. London: Psychology Press.
Wetherick, N. E. (1965). Changing and esta-
blished concept: A comparison of the abi-
lity of young, middle- aged and old subjects.
Gerontologia, 11, 82-95.
Whaley, C.P. (1978). Wordonword classification
time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal
Behavior, 17, 143-154.
Whetherick, N.E.&Gilhooly, K. J. (1990). Syl-
logistic reasoning: Effects of premise order.
In K.J. Gilhooly, M.T. G.Keane, R.H. Logie
&G.Erdos (Eds.), Lines of Thought. (Vol.1).
New York: John Wiley.
Wickelgren, W. A. (1965). Acoustic similarity
and retroactive interference in short-term
memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Ver‑
bal Behavior, 4, 53-61.
Wickelgren, W. A. (1974). Relations, operators,
predicates, and the syntax of (verbal) propo-
sitional and (spatial) operational memory. Bul‑
letin of the Psychonomic Society, 6, 161-164.
Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in
attention. In R.Parasuraman&D.R. Davies
(Eds.), Varieties of attention. London: Acade-
mic Press.
Wickens, D.E., Dalezman, R.E.&Eggemeier, F.T.
(1976). Multiple encoding of word attributes
in memory. Memory&Cognition, 4, 307-310.
Wiersman, W. & Klausmeier, H. J. (1965). The
effect of age upon speed of concept attain-
ment. Journal of Gerontology, 20, 398-400.
Willis, A.J. (2013). Models of categorization. In
D. Reisberg (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of
Cognitive Psychology. Oxford: Oxford Uni-
versity Press.
Witt, J. K., Linkenauger, S. A., Bakdash,
J. Z. & Proffitt, D. R. (2008). Putting to
a bigger hole: Golf performance relates to
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 416 27/02/2018 11:14:19

Bibliographie
n 417
perceived size. Psychonomic Bulletin and
Review, 15, 581-585.
Wolfe, J.M. (1998). Visual search. In H.Pashler
(Ed.), Attention. Hove, England UK: Psycho-
logy Press.
Wolfe, J.M., Alvarez, G.A., Rosenholtz, R., Kuz-
mova, Y.I.&Sherman, A.M. (2011). Visual
search for arbitrary objects in real scenes.
Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73,
1650-1671.
Wolfe, J.M., Vo, M.L.-H, Evans, K.K.&Greene,
M.R. (2011). Visual search in scenes involves
selective and nonselective pathways. Trends
in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 77-84.
Wood, N. L. & Cowan, N.(1995). The cocktail
party phenomenon revisited: Attention and
memory in the classic selective listening pro-
cedure of Cherry (1953). Journal of Experi‑
mental Psychology: General, 124, 243-62.
Woodworth, R. S. & Sells, S. B. (1935). An
atmosphere effect in formal syllogistic rea-
soning. Journal of Experimental Psychology,
18, 451-460.
Worthy, D. A. & Maddox, W. T. (2012). Age-
based differences in strategy use in choice
tasks. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 5, 1-10.
Wright, G.N.&Phillips, L.D. (1980). Cultural
variation in probabilistic thinking: Alterna-
tive ways of dealing with uncertainty. Inter‑
national Journal of Psychology, 15, 239-257.
Wright, R. E. (1981). Aging, divided attention,
and processing capacity. Journal of Geronto‑
logy, 36, 605-614.
Zagar, D., Pynte, J. & Raviteau, S. (1997). Evi-
dence for early-closure attachment on
first-pass reading times in French. Quarterly
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Experimental Psychology, 50, 421-438.
Zaragoza, M.S.&Mitchell, K. J. (1996). Repea-
ted exposure to suggestion and the creation
of false memories. Psychological Science, 7,
294-300.
Zaragoza, M. S., McCloskey, M. & Jamis,
M. (1987). Misleading postevent informa-
tion and recall of the original event: Further
evidence against the memory impairment
hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psycho‑
logy: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13,
36-44.
Zesiger, P. (1995). Écrire. Approches cognitive,
neuropsychologique et développementale.
Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Zesiger, P., Mounoud, P.& Hauert, C.A. (1993).
Effects of lexicality and trigram frequency
on handwriting production in children and
adults. Acta Psychologica, 82, 353-365.
Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C. & Zorzi, M. (2014).
Modelling reading development through
phonological decoding and self-teaching:
Implications for dyslexia. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369,
20120397.
Ziegler, J.C., Montant, M., Jacobs, A.M. (1997).
The feedback consistency effect in lexical
decision and naming. Journal of Memory and
Language, 37, 533-554.
Ziegler, J. C., Rey, A. & Jacobs, A. M. (1998).
Individual word identification thresholds
and errors in the fragmentation task.
Memory&Cognition, 26, 490-501.
297384BWA_PSYCOG.indb 417 27/02/2018 11:14:19