ArticlePDF Available

Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence in Thailand



There is no recent national data on the prevalence of intimate partner violence in Thailand. This study proposed to examine the prevalence of intimate partner violence in 4 regions of Thailand by using a standardized questionnaire from the WHO multi country study on women’s health and domestic violence. Two thousand four hundred and sixty-two married or cohabiting women aged 20–59 years were interviewed about their experiences of psychologically, physically, sexually violent, and/or controlling behaviors by their male partners. The study found that 15% of respondents had experienced psychological, physical, and/or sexual violence in their life time which suggests that 1 in 6 of Thai women have faced intimate partner violence. Of the 15% of women who reported intimate partner violence within the past 12 months, psychological violence was the most common (60–68%), followed by sexual violence (62–63%) and physical violence (52–65%). In addition, the percentage of women who faced various forms of controlling behaviors varied from 4.6% to 29.3%. Men who were more controlling were more likely to abuse their female partners. The results reveal that partner violence against women is a significant public health issue in Thai society that must be addressed.
Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence in Thailand
Montakarn Chuemchit
&Suttharuethai Chernkwanma
&Rewat Rugkua
&Laddawan Daengthern
Pajaree Abdullakasim
&Saskia E. Wieringa
Published online: 7 April 2018
#The Author(s) 2018
There is no recent national data on the prevalence of intimate partner violence in Thailand. This study proposed to examine the
prevalence of intimate partner violence in 4 regions of Thailand by using a standardized questionnaire from the WHO multi
country study on womens health and domestic violence. Two thousand four hundred and sixty-two married or cohabiting
women aged 2059 years were interviewed about their experiences of psychologically, physically, sexually violent, and/or
controlling behaviors by their male partners.The study found that 15% of respondents had experienced psychological, physical,
and/or sexual violence in their life time which suggests that 1 in 6 of Thai women have faced intimate partner violence. Of the
15% of women who reported intimate partner violence within the past 12 months, psychological violence was the most common
(6068%), followed by sexual violence (6263%) and physical violence (5265%). In addition, the percentage of women who
faced various forms of controlling behaviors varied from 4.6% to 29.3%. Men who were more controlling were more likely to
abuse their female partners. The results reveal that partner violence against women is a significant public health issue in Thai
society that must be addressed.
Keywords Intimate partner violence .Domestic violence .Thailand .National prevalence
Violence against women is a significant problem and a uni-
versal phenomenon around the world, including in Thailand.
One in 3 (35%) women around the world have experienced
physical and/or sexual violence by their partner in their life-
time (WHO 2016). The United Nations defines violence
against women as any acts of violent behavior that results in
physical, sexual or psychological harm to women (UN 1993).
There are many forms of violence against women. One of the
most common forms is Intimate Partner Violence (IPV)
(WHO 2002). IPV is a major public health issue, a hidden
social problem, and womens human rights violation (WHO
2016), (WHO 2005a) which negatively affects womensphys-
ical, mental, sexual and/or reproductive health (WHO 2016).
Intimate Partner Violence in Thailand
In Thai society, IPV is considered as a private issue and family
matter because the family is an important social institution,
and portrayed as a space of love and care, however, in reality
family violence exists. Most Thais learn they should not tell
outsiders about internal family matters. As a result, IPV re-
mains an invisible and unrecognized issue in Thai society and
women victims have to deal with their intimate violence in
their lives alone (Archavanitkul et al. 2005). When violence
occurs in families, it is not reported, thus the statistics on IPV
in Thailand are likely to be underestimated. Most of IPV sta-
tistics in Thailand are reports from Government Organizations
(GOs) and Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) such as
the One Stop Crisis Centre (OSCC). The OSCC is run by the
Ministry of Public Health and is a unit in government hospi-
tals aimed to assist victims of violent situations from police
station, NGOsand shelters. Individuals who notify the police
or visit a hospital are likely severe cases of violence. Statistics
*Montakarn Chuemchit
College of Public Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn Univerisity,
Institute Building 2, Phayathai Road, Patumwan, Bangkok 10330,
The Royal Thai Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand
Faculty of Nursing, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand
Faculty of Public Health, Burapha University, Chonburi, Thailand
The Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research, University of
Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Journal of Family Violence (2018) 33:315323
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
show that the numbers of domestic violence cases have sig-
nificantly increased from 25,767 to 31,866 between 2010 and
2013 respectively (Thai Health Promotion Foundation 2011),
(The Women's Affairs and Family Development 2013). In
addition, the report from the OSCC, Ministry of Public
Health (MOPH) found that, in 2015, there were 23,977 wom-
en who used their services. Furthermore, there were 460 cases
of partner violence wherein police were notified and 373 cases
which were sent to the court (The Women's Affairs and
Family Development 2015).
To address intimate partner violence, in 2007, Thailand
launched BDomestic Violence Victim Protection Act, B.E.
2550^and amended the criminal law B.E. 2550 section 276
(Penal Code Amendment Act (No.19) B.E. 2550 (2007)
2007). The BDomestic Violence Victim Protection Act, B.E.
2550^comprises 18 sections; many sections are important to
victims, perpetrators, and government officers. For example,
section 4states that BWhoever conducts any act of domestic
violence or is said to commit domestic violence shall be liable
to imprison for a term of not exceeding six months or to a fine
of not exceeding six thousand Baht or both^;section5stats
that BA domestic violence victim or a person who has found or
known of domestic violence shall have the duty to notify a
competent official for the execution of this Act..^Prior to
2007, the criminal law B.E. 2550 section 276, did not include
marital rape as a crime so spouses were not legally protected
against sexual abuse by their partner (Penal Code Amendment
Act (No.16) B.E. 2546 (2003) 2003). However, changes to the
law in 2007 added legal protection for spouses who are
victims of sexually violence by their partner.
Intimate Partner Violence Research in Thailand
The WHO Multi-country study on Womens Health and
Domestic Violence Against Women (2005) examined the
prevalence of intimate partner violence in 10 countries:
Bangladesh, Brazil, Ethiopia, Japan, Namibia, Peru, Samoa,
Serbia, Tanzania, and Thailand.
The study found that of the 24,097 women participants,
16.0% to 61.0% had experienced some act of physical partner
violence in their lifetime. Sexual violence was reported by
6.0% to 58.0% of respondents. In addition, 16.0% to 69.0%
of women reported that they had experienced either sexual
and/or physical violence by their partners. In Thailand, the
study found that 22.9% of women in urban areas reported
physical violence, 29.9% reported sexual violence, and
41.1% reported physical or sexual violence, or both.
Whereas, 33.8% of women in rural areas reported physical
violence, 28.9% reported sexual violence, and 47.4% reported
physical or sexual violence, or both. It is interesting to note
that urban Thai women reported more sexual violence than
physical violence. The percentage of both urban and rural
women revealing one or more acts of controlling behaviors
by male partner varied from 4.7% to 31.3%. Furthermore, in
all settings, women who had experienced either physical and/
or sexual violence regularly reported more emotional suffer-
ing and identified physical health issues such as pain (WHO
In 2006, there was a cohort study on domestic violence
among pregnant Thai women in one province. They recruited
421 women in third trimester of pregnancy and followed them
until 6 weeks postpartum. The study revealed that 53.7% re-
ported psychological violence, 26.6% faced physical violence,
and 19.2% confronted sexual violence by their partner during
the current pregnancy. Whereas, in the postpartum period re-
spondents who had experienced some type of intimate partner
violence ranged from 9.5% to 35.4% (Sricamsuk 2006).
The latest National Reproductive Health Survey from 2009
(Social Statistics Bureau 2010) revealed that the rate of inti-
mate partner violence among Thai women across the country
was 2.9%. More recently, Chuemchit and Perngparn (2014)
reported that between July December, 2010 there were 471
women in Bangkok city who used the services at One Stop
Crisis Centre and more than 70% of women had been victim-
ized more than once (Chuemchit and Perngparn 2014).
These data are the tip of the iceberg; the true extent of the
issue cannot be seen. In Thailand, there have been no large-
scale IPV prevalence studies since the 2005 WHO Multi-
country study on Womens Health and Domestic Violence
Against Women. In response, the aim of this study was to
examine the current prevalence of the various forms of inti-
mate partner violence, including physical, psychological, sex-
ual violence, and controlling behaviors and to identify factors
associated with partner violence.
This study was a cross-sectional study in 4 regions of
Thailand: central, northern, southern, and northeastern which
are the official government-categorized zones. A multi-stage
sampling technique was used; first, simple random sampling
was used for selection of one province in each region, second,
all districts from the region were chosen for the study.
The sample size was calculated by n
π= The proportion of IPV in Thailand (5.13%), based on
National Statistic Office 2006. Therefore, a total sample size
of 2,462 eligible persons was sought. Then the sample was
calculated as proportionate to the size of each province and
district. Finally, convenience sampling was used to select the
participants at each community site. At the community level,
first, researchers went to see a community leader to request the
names and addresses of married or cohabiting women.
316 J Fam Viol (2018) 33:315323
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Second, researchers visited womens houses based on the list
to conduct interviews. All eligible women we met were select
as respondents. While both men and women can be victims,
women are more likely than men to face various forms of
partner violence and report IPV-related injury (Hegarty
2000), (Breiding et al. 2008), (Tjaden and Thoennes 2000).
Therefore, this study focused on women age 2059 years, still
married or cohabiting with a partner, and willing to participate
in the study. Table 1provides a brief description of the study
Procedure and Data Collection
Each province had research assistants under the supervision of
the principal investigator. In order to ensure quality data was
captured, the female research assistants recruited for the data
collection had at a minimum a bachelor degree, worked in the
area of public health, and were experienced in community-
based research. In each site, the interviews were conducted
by trained interviewers who passed the standardized training
based on WHO womens health and domestic violence study
(Jansen et al. 2004) covering issues of gender-based violence
and its consequences, gender sensitivity, interviewing tech-
niques and skills, ethic, and the questionnaire. To ensure the
confidentiality and safety of participants, each participant had
a separate and private interview by a trained female interview-
er. All these processes were intended to protect the privacy of
the participants and minimize the shame of respondents for
disclosing details of their relationship. After finishing the in-
terview, all respondents received useful information about
available services, for instance, hotline call center, shelter
houses, and OSCCs in each province. Interviewers also pro-
vided respondents with additional support from local health
service providers if requested. The data collection was con-
ducted in 2016.
Ethical permission for this study was obtained from the
Ethics Review Committee for Research Involving Human
Research Subjects, Health Science Group, Chulalongkorn
University (COA No.201/2016), Thailand.
Measurement Tool
A questionnaire was developed from the WHO multi country
studyonwomens health and domestic violence
(Archavanitkul et al. 2005), (Garcia-Moreno et al. 2006).
The WHO multi country study onwomens health and domes-
tic violence, measures three items of Bsexual abuse^, six items
of Bphysical abuse^,fouritemsofBpsychological abuse^,and
seven items of Bcontrolling behaviors^which were examined
separately from psychological abuse. After the pre-test, the
Cronbach alphas for this measurement tool was 0.94.
The participants were asked questions related to their ex-
perience of specific acts of psychological, physical, and sexual
abuse by their current husband and/or cohabiting male partner.
Furthermore, we also followed the WHO framing of the ques-
tions which highlighted Bhow partners treat each other rather
than so-called conflict negotiation^(Garcia-Moreno et al.
2006), (Heise and Garcia-Moreno 2002) because much inti-
mate abuse in the Thai context can be conceptualized as
The questions on psychologically violent acts focused on
insulting, humiliating, scaring, and threatening behaviors. The
questions on physically violent acts were categorized as: 1)
mild-to-moderate violence and 2) severe violence based on
physical injury. Mild-to-moderate violence included pushing,
shoving, grabbing or slapping and severe violence included
choking, kicking, or using a weapon (WHO 2005b)(see
Tab le 2). Sexually violent acts included using physical force
for sexual intercourse, having sexual intercourse against
womens will, and sexual humiliation. For each act of vio-
lence, each participant was asked whether it had occurred over
a year ago or within the year and then asked about the fre-
quency of each act: 1) once or twice 2) a few times or 3) more
than five times. The lifetime prevalence of IPV was defined as
women who reported any kind of violent experience by a
Table 1 Study sites by region and
province* Region Female population
(2059 years old)
Province Sample size
Central 5,113,691 Chonburi: Famous province for Oceanside. Lots of
factory and tourism business. 80 km from Bangkok
Northern 3,644,532 Phitsanulok: 383 km from Bangkok. Mountainous area
mostly in Agriculture
Southern 2,659,222 Surat Thani: Large City in the region. Center for tourism
along seaside. Mostly in tourism and fishery business.
639 km from Bangkok
Northeastern 6,595,363 Khonkaen: Big city and the center of northeastern.
Mostly in agriculture and tourism service business.
449 km from Bangkok
Tot a l 246 2
*Thailand consist of 77 provinces
J Fam Viol (2018) 33:315323 317
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
current partner over a year before the interview. Current prev-
alence was defined as women revealing at least one act of
partner violence during the past year.
In addition, this study also focused on seven forms of con-
trolling behaviors by womens male partners which consisted
of various acts to force and restrict womens daily life. For
each act of controlling behavior, each respondent was asked
whether it had happened within the past year (Yes or No).
BYes^responses were given a score of one and BNo^re-
sponses were given a score of zero. Total scores were catego-
rized into four levels (Garcia-Moreno et al. 2006): (1) None
(2) low (3) medium and (4) high.
Data Analysis
All data was entered, cleaned and coded before analyzing.
Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS Version 22)
was used to perform Uni-variate, Bivariate, and multivariate
analysis. Uni-variate analysis was used to describe and sum-
marize variables and find patterns in the data. (e.g. frequen-
cies, percentages, means and standard deviation). Bivariate
and multivariate analysis were used to test relationships be-
tween variables. For bivariate analysis, Pearsons Chi square
test with statistical level of Pvalue <0.05 was used to analyze
the association between controlling behaviors by male partner
and experiences of violence. Multivariate regression was used
to examine differences in lifetime IPV by demographic
In this study, four provinces from 4 regions were sampled
according to the proportion of the population. The mean
age of the respondents was 39.4. Thirty-four percent of wom-
en had finished higher education, the rest had completed
high-school, primary school, secondary school, and no
education, respectively. About 10.7% of participants were
housewives and/or no occupation, while 89.3% had an occu-
pation (See Table 3).
Table 2 Items of the questionnaire used to define psychological, physical, sexual violence, and controlling behaviors by intimate male partner
Psychological violence Physical violence Sexual violence Controlling behaviors
Insulted or made feel bad
about oneself
Mild-to-moderate: Physically forced you to have sex
when you did not want
Tried to keep you from seeing friends
Humiliated or belittled in
front of other people
Slapped or threw something
that could hurt
Had sexual intercourse when did
not want because afraid of what
partner might do
Tried to restrict you to contact your family
Did things to scare or frighten Pushed or shoved Was forced to do sexual activity
that degrading or humiliating
Insisted on knowing where you were at all times
Threatened to hurt you or
someone you care about
Severe violence: Ignored you and treated you indifferently
Hit with fist or something
that could hurt
Got angry if you spoke with another man
kicked, dragged, or beaten up Was often suspicious that you were unfaithful
Chocked or burnt Expected you to ask permission before going out
Threatened to use weapon
Table 3 Selected socio-demographic characteristics of 2462 married/
cohabiting women of the 4 regions of Thailand
Characteristics n (%)
Province (n= 2462)
Chonburi 725 (29.4)
Phitsanulok 457 (18.6)
Surat Thani tourism 378 (15.4)
Khonkaen 902 (36.6)
Age (n=2441)
2029 years 487 (20.0)
3039 years 712 (29.2)
4049 years 766 (31.4)
5059 years 476 (19.5)
Mean ± SD 39.4 ± 10.2
Range 2059 years
Education (n= 2396)
No education 25 (1.0)
Primary 576 (23.5)
Secondary 398 (16.3)
High school 608 (24.8)
Higher education 840 (34.3)
Occupation (n= 2458)
Housewife/ no occupation 262 (10.7)
Agriculture 521 (21.2)
Permanent employee 682 (27.7)
Temporary employee 144 (5.9)
Business owner 242 (9.8)
Company staff 221 (9.0)
Government officer 338 (13.8)
Other 48 (1.9)
318 J Fam Viol (2018) 33:315323
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Results demonstrate that out of 2,462 respondents, 15.4%
had encountered psychological, physical, or sexual violence,
suggesting that 1 in 6 married or cohabiting Thai women have
experiences intimate partner violence in their lifetime (See
Tab le 4).
Tab le 5reflects the proportion of married/cohabiting wom-
en who disclosed having experienced psychological, physical,
or sexual intimate partner violence in their lifetime(over 1 year
ago) or currently (within the past year). The study revealed
that the most commonly reported type of partner violence was
psychological violence. Sexually violence by a partner was
noticeably less prevalent than the other 2 types of violence.
Mild to moderate physical violence were more prevalent than
severe physical violence.
The most common form of psychological violence was
being scared (15.4%), followed by being insulted (14.8%),
being humiliated or belittled (10.9%), and being threatened
(7.5%). Reports of physical violence included being pushed
or shoved (10.6%), follow by being slapped or thrown (8.3%),
being hit with a fist (5.4%), being threatened with a weapon
(4.4%), being kicked/dragged/beaten up (4.1%), being
chocked/burnt (2.6%). Reports of sexual violence, found that
10.4% of respondents revealed unwanted sexual intercourse,
5.4% were physically forced to have sex and 3.3% were
forced to do sexual activities that were degrading or
There were considerable differences between the propor-
tion of women who experienced lifetime violence and current
violence. More than 60% of respondents faced all forms of
psychological violence and all forms of sexual violence in the
past year, more than half (>50%) had experienced both mild to
moderate and severe physical violence in the past year as well.
The lifetime prevalence of IPV varied by the type of vio-
lence experienced. Psychological violence varied from 31.6%
(threatened to hurt you or someone you care about) to 39.6%
(humiliated or belittled in front of other people); physical vi-
olence varied from 34.9% (chocked or burnt) to 47.5%
(pushed or shoved); whereas, sexual violence varied from
36.2% (was forced to do sexual activity that was degrading
or humiliating) to 37.4% (physically forced you to have sex
when you did not want). Most respondents reported repeated
acts of IPV.
Tab les 6and 7show the proportion of married/cohabiting
women who reported having experienced controlling
behaviours by an intimate partner and highlight the associa-
tion between experiences of violence and controlling behav-
iours. The most frequently reportedact of controlling behavior
by a male partner was Binsisted on knowing where the female
partner was at all times^(29.3%) followed by Bgot angry if
female partner spoke with another man^(28.5%), Bsuspicious
that female partner is unfaithful^(21.3%), Bignored and treat-
ed indifferently^(16.5%), Bkeeps female partner from seeing
friends^(15.2%), Bexpected female partner to ask permission
before going out^(10.7%), and Btried to restrict female part-
ner to contact your family^(4.6%).
The percentage of women who reported one or more acts of
controlling behaviors by their male partner varied from 13.5%
to 39.3%, which suggests that the level of male control over
female behavior is normative to a certain degrees. The respon-
dents who had experienced IPV were significantly more likely
to have also experienced controlling behavior by their male
partner than women who had not faced partner violence.
Tab le 8illustrates multivariate logistic regression models to
determine relationships between lifetime IPV victimization
and demographic variables. There were significant differences
in IPV prevalence among provincial settings. Compared to
women in Chonburi province (central), Phitsanulok province
(northern) were significantly more likely to have experienced
lifetime IPV victimization (OR 2.34; 95% CI = 1.344.06).
Women who worked in Bwhite collar^occupations were sig-
nificantly less likely to report lifetime IPV victimization than
Table 4 The proportion of married/cohabiting women who revealed
facing violent experiences by male partner
Experiences of violence n (%)
Never 2,083 (84.6)
Ever 379 (15.4)
Table 5 Lifetime (over 1 year ago) and current prevalence (with past
year) of psychological, physical, or sexual intimate partner violence
among married/cohabiting Thai women
Violent Act Abused
ago (%)
Insulted or made feel bad (14.8) (39.5) (60.5)
Humiliated or belittled (10.9) (39.6) (60.4)
Did things to scare (15.4) (38.1) (61.9)
Threatened to hurt (7.5) (31.6) (68.4)
slapped or threw (8.3) (40.6) (59.4)
Pushed or shoved (10.6) (47.5) (52.5)
hit with fist (5.4) (46.9) (53.1)
kicked, dragged, beaten up (4.1) (40.4) (59.6)
Chocked or burnt (2.6) (34.9) (65.1)
Threatened to use weapon (4.4) (43.4) (56.6)
physically forced you to have sex (5.4) (37.4) (62.6)
Had sexual intercourse because afraid of (10.4) (37.3) (62.7)
was forced to do sexual activity that
degrading or humiliating
(3.3) (36.2) (63.8)
J Fam Viol (2018) 33:315323 319
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
women who worked in Bblue collar^occupations (OR 0.66;
95% CI = 0.520.85). Women who completed higher educa-
tion were significantly less likely to report lifetime IPV vic-
timization than those who had no education and those who
completed only primary education (OR 0.37; 95% CI = 0.15
0.91) and (OR 0.66; 95% CI = 0.490.89), respectively).
Women who had sufficient income and savings were signifi-
cantly less likely to report lifetime IPV victimization than
those who had insufficient income and those who had suffi-
cient but no saving (OR 0.26; 95% CI = 0.170.41) and (OR
0.46; 95% CI = 0.300.72), respectively).
According to this study 15.4% of married/cohabiting Thai
women have experienced psychological, physical, and/or sex-
ual intimate partner violence at some point in their lives. This
number is considerably higher than the latest National
Reproductive Health Survey in 2009 (Social Statistics
Bureau 2010), which found that the national prevalence of
partner violence among Thai women was 2.9%. This wide
discrepancy in results could be due to the measurement tool.
The 2009 survey asked only one question about experience of
physical partner violence in the past 12 months, if the response
was yes, then there were 2 following questions: 1) what was
the reason for the violence and; 2) have you ever asked for any
help. This single question is a limitation of the previous survey
because intimate partner violence can be psychological, phys-
ical, and/or sexual violence and surveys should ask
behaviorally specific questions in order to encourage respon-
dents to disclose the entire scope of their violent experiences
(Garcia-Moreno et al. 2006), (Straus et al. 1996), (Ellsberg
et al. 2001).
This study also showed that across the country, psycholog-
ical violence had the highest prevalence followed by physical
violence and then sexual violence. Similar findings have been
recorded in the WHO multi-country study (Garcia-Moreno
et al. 2006)onwomens health and domestic violence, across
10 countries, sexual violence was greatly less prevalent than
physical violence. However, Thailand was an exception with
rates of sexual violence higher than physical violence in the
WHO multi-country study. Forty-four percent of women in
the city and 29% of women in the province had experienced
sexual violence by their partner (Archavanitkul et al. 2005),
(Garcia-Moreno et al. 2006), (Heise and Garcia-Moreno
To explain these contradictory results, we had look back
over the past decades, particularly the Thai policies and cam-
paigns on IPV prevention. For example, BDomestic Violence
Victim Protection Act, B.E. 2550^and BAmended the crimi-
nal law B.E.2550 section 276^. Prior to the amended law,
section 276 stated that Bany person who commits sexual in-
tercourse with a woman who is not his wife, and against the
latters will, by threatening her, or doing any act of vio-
lence, shall be punished with imprisonment^(Penal
Code Amendment Act (No.16) B.E. 2546 (2003) 2003).
However, changes to the law, by removing the sentence Bwith
a woman who is not his wife^, added protection to spouses
against sexually violence by their partners (Penal Code
Table 6 Portrays the proportion
of married/cohabiting women
who reported having experienced
controlling behaviours by an
intimate partner
Controlling behaviours n Ever Never
n%n %
Tried to keep you from seeing friends 2461 374 15.2 2087 84.8
Tried to restrict you to contact your family 2460 114 4.6 2346 95.4
Insisted on knowing where you were at all times 2462 722 29.3 1740 70.7
Ignored you and treated you indifferently 2461 405 16.5 2056 83.5
Got angry if you spoke with another man 2462 702 28.5 1760 71.5
Was often suspicious that you were unfaithful 2462 524 21.3 1938 78.7
Expected you to ask permission before going out 2462 264 10.7 2198 89.3
Table 7 Controlling behaviours
by intimate male partner reported
by married/cohabiting women
Number of married/
cohabiting women
of violence
Act of controlling behaviours P* Number of
Act, mean
2,079 Never 56.2 17.7 17.9 8.2 1.0
379 Ever 21.6 13.5 25.6 39.3 <0·0001 2.6 <0·0001
The percentage presents controlling behaviours act regard to partner violence experience. *Pearson χ22×4table.
320 J Fam Viol (2018) 33:315323
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Amendment Act (No.19) B.E. 2550 (2007)2007). These tools
may gradually reduce the prevalence of sexual violence in
Thai society but do not appear to have had a major impact
over the last 10 years. However, today the campaigns related
to IPV prevention are rarely seen in mainstream Thai society.
All of the women who reported physical violence had ex-
perienced more violence in the past year than over her life-
time. These study results confirm that IPV is a common expe-
rience worldwide. In a Japanese city, the lifetime prevalence
of physical abused by an intimate partner was 13%, whereas,
In Vietnam, the prevalence rate of physical partner violence
was 30.9% (Vung et al. 2008). In Cambodia, 25% of women
interviewed experienced partner violence since marriage, with
23% disclosing such violence in the prior year (Yount and
Carrera 2006). Whereas, in Canada 6% of women revealed
having been abused by their male partner (McCormick et al.
2016). In the USA, 5.3% of postpartum women stated that
they were physically victimized by an intimate partner in the
year prior to becoming pregnant (Stewart et al. 2017). A WHO
Study recorded that the 12-month prevalence of partner vio-
lence was much higher in developing countries as compared
to developed countries such as Canada and the USA
(McCormick et al. 2016), (Stewart et al. 2017) which suggests
that a good legal framework, effective government cam-
paigns, sufficient shelters and womens individual empower-
ment are important and provide a foundation from which
women have more resources to choose to withdraw from abu-
sive relationships. Findings that emphasize the importance of
resources and social status have been noted in Vietnam(Yount
and Carrera 2006) and others, and suggest that partner vio-
lence might be different in settings of low income and unem-
ployment status compare with higher socio-economic settings
(Mallory et al. 2016). Finally, controlling behaviors by male
partners were significantly associated with partner violence,
which is consistent with WHO findings showing that men
who are a perpetrators also show higher rates of controlling
behaviors than men who do not abuse their partner (Garcia-
Moreno et al. 2006). Therefore, resources to support women
coupled with campaigns to educate men and deemphasize
traditional gender norms may be critical to reducing rates of
IPV in Thailand.
This study only asked about rates of IPV against women,
although women may also be perpetrators of violence in
relationships. However, research has consistently demon-
strated that men are the dominant perpetrators of violence
in relationships including married and cohabiting relation-
ships (Archavanitkul et al. 2005), (Garcia-Moreno et al.
2006), (Zhang et al. 2012). Some studies have documented
that women are almost eight times more likely to be vic-
tims of violence by a partner than men (Stuckless et al.
2015). Another limitation was this study based on self-re-
port, which may be affected by recall bias, as well as cul-
tural biases in disclosure which affect to participantswill-
ingness to reveal their violent experiences. We recognize
that in the Thai context, IPV is viewed as a family affair.
The privacy of the family in Thai society strengths gender
power imbalance and hierarchies that are often dependent
on the sustainability of male domination and violence
(Mohamad and Wieringa 2014). This research highlights
the prevalence of psychological, physical and sexual inti-
mate partner violence in Thai society. Although some dif-
ferences in prevalence were noted in the results according
to education, occupation, and number of partners these
differences did not account for the varying rates of vio-
lence across provinces.
Table 8 Relationship between lifetime IPV victimization and
demographic variables
Lifetime IPV
OR 95% CI
Phitsanulok 2.335 1.344.06
Khonkaen 0.36 0.260.49
Suratthani 0.19 0.130.27
Chonburi Ref Ref
Age (years)
2029 1.29 0.921.81
3039 1.31 0.961.79
4049 1.29 0.951.76
5059 Ref Ref
Housewife 1.78 0.521.15
Blue collar 0.66 0.520.85
White collar Ref Ref
None 0.37 0.150.91
Primary school 0.66 0.490.89
High school 0.79 0.601.03
Higher education Ref Ref
Years o f c o n j u g a l l i v i n g
< 10 1.10 0.731.66
1120 1.12 0.721.73
2130 0.95 0.611.47
> 30 Ref Ref
Insufficient 0.26 0.170.41
Sufficient but no saving 0.46 0.300.72
Sufficient and saving Ref Ref
J Fam Viol (2018) 33:315323 321
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
This study had significant methodological strengths in-
cluding: using a standardized questionnaire, pre-testing
the questionnaire, training interviewers, and collaborating
with communities to account for the ethical complexities of
working on sensitive issues within communities in
Thailand. All these methodological techniques may help
to reduce bias in the study and increase disclosure.
However, we believe that in Thai culture, violence is a
deeply personal issue which likely leads to an underesti-
mation of the overall violence situation in Thai society.
Hence, the findings of this study should be thought of as
an underestimation of the actual rate of intimate partner
violence in Thailand.
This study confirms the high prevalence of intimate partner
violence in Thailand which is a serious human rights vio-
lation and highly significant public health issue as IPV is
linked to many negative health consequences. These re-
sults should encourage national action to prevent IPV and
contribute national data to a spectrum of interest groups
including policy makers, public health practitioners,
multi-disciplinary, educators, media, activists, and commu-
nities. National policy change should work to eliminate the
root causes of violence against women and re-build Thai
society as violence free society. For instance, the govern-
ment needs to prioritize the establishment of a special
agency solely responsible for providing a comprehensive
package of services to women suffering from various
forms of violence. The services must include: counseling,
shelter, rehabilitation and referrals to additional health and
social support services and professional sensitivity training
for multi-disciplinary practitioners on issues concerning
violence against women and the enhancement of a public
campaign through the mass media and social media to
eradicate all forms of violence against women. Moreover,
we must challenge social norms to ensure that domestic
violence is a public rather than a private issue and create
networks and community participation to prevent and to
monitor domestic violence in the community. Media mes-
saging should focus on promoting gender equity, respect
for human dignity and non-violent relationships. In partic-
ular, media should work to avoid reproducing structural
and cultural violence against women in media reporting
and avoid producing content that reinforces and motivates
Acknowledgments This research project is supported by the Thailand
Research Fund (2016).
Thank you to Dr. Marion Doull to revise and edit a final draft. Thank
you to everyone who partcipated in this study. Contributions made by all
participants are greatly appreciated.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://, which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appro-
priate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the
Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Archavanitkul, K., Kanchanachitra, C., Im-em, W., & Lerdsrisuntad, U.
(2005). Intimate partner violence and WomenshealthinThailand.
Nakhonprathom, Thailand: Institute for Population and Social
Research, Mahidol University.
Breiding, M. J., Black, M. C., & Ryan, G. W. (2008). Prevalence and risk
factors of intimate partner violence in eighteen U.S. states/territories,
2005. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34(2), 112118.
Chuemchit, M., & Perngparn, U. (2014). Intimate partner violence:
Thailand situation and intervention Programme. International
Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 4(4), 275278. https://
Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., Pena, R., Agurto, S., & Winkvist, A. (2001).
Researching domestic violence against women: methodological
and ethical considerations. Studies in Family Planning, 32(1), 116.
Garcia-Moreno, C., Jansen, H. A. F. M., Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., & Watts,
C. H. (2006). Prevalence of intimate partner violence: Findings from
the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic
violence. The Lancet, 368(9543), 12601269.
Hegarty, K. (2000). Domestic violence in Australia: Definition, preva-
lence and nature of presentation in clinical practice. Medical Journal
of Australia, 173,363367.
Heise, L., & Garcia-Moreno, C. (2002). Violence by intimate partners:
World report on violence and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World
Health Organization.
Jansen, H., Watts, C., Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., & Garcia-Moreno, C.
(2004). Interviewer training in the WHO multi-country study on
Wom e n s health and domestic violence. Violence Against Women,
Mallory, A. B., Dharnidharka, P., Deitz, S. L., Barros-Gomes, P.,
Cafferky, B., Stith, S. M., & Van, K. (2016). A meta-analysis of
cross cultural risk markers for intimate partner violence.
Aggression and Violent Behavior, 31,116126.
McCormick, A. V., Cohen, I. M., & Plecas, D. (2016). 1 Intimate partner
violence in Canada.. Domestic Violence in International Context
(27), 20.
Mohamad, M., & Wieringa, S. (2014). Family ambiguity and domestic
violence in Asia: Reconceptualising law and process. IIAS
Newsletter, 2123.
Penal Code Amendment Act (No.16) B.E. 2546 (2003). (2003). Royal
Thai Government Gazettee, 120, 4a (p. 1). Royal Thai Government:
Bangkok, Thailand.
Penal Code Amendment Act (No.19) B.E. 2550 (2007). (2007). Royal
Thai Government Gazettee, 124, 56 a, 1. Bangkok, Thailand: Royal
Thai Government.
Social Statistics Bureau. (2010). National Statistical Office. Report on
National Reproductive Health Survey 2009. Bangkok, Thailand:
Nationeal Statistical Office.
322 J Fam Viol (2018) 33:315323
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Sricamsuk, A. (2006). Domestic violence against pregnant women: A
Thai perspective. (Doctor of Philosophy), Griffith University,
Stewart, D. E., Vigod, S. N., MacMillan, H. L., Chandra, P. S., Han, A.,
Rondon, M. B., et al. (2017). Current reports on perinatal intimate
partner violence. Current Psychiatry Reports, 19(5), 26. https://doi.
Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B.
(1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2) development
and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues,
17(3), 283316.
Stuckless, N., Toner, B., & Butt, N. (2015). Perspectives on violence
against women: Social, health, and societal consequences of inter-
partner violence. The United States: Springer International
Thai Health Promotion Foundation. (2011). Situation of Violence Against
Women and Child: One Stop Crisis Centre of Ministry of Public Health
Retrieved from
Accessed 18 August 2017.
The Women's Affairs and Family Development. (2013). Report on
Violence Health (T. H. P. Foundation Ed.). Bangkok, Thailand:
Thai Health Promotion Foundation.
The Women's Affairs and Family Development. (2015). Report on inti-
mate partner violence situation. Bangkok, Thailand: Ministry of
Social Development and Human Security.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Prevalence and consequences of
male-to-female and female-to male intimate partner violence as
measured by the National Violence against Women Survey.
Violence Against Women, 6(2), 142161.
UN. (1993). Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women
UN General Assembly. Retrieved from
daw/vaw/reports.htm. Accessed 6 August 2017.
Vung, N. D., Ostergren, P. O., & Krantz, G. (2008). Intimate partner
violence against women in rural Vietnam-different socio-demo-
graphic factors are associated with different forms of violence:
Need for new intervention guidelines? BMC Public Health, 8(1), 55.
WHO. (2002). World report on violence and health. Geneva: World
Health Organization.
WHO. (2005a). National report on violence and health. Geneva: World
Health Organization.
WHO. (2005b). WHO multi-country study on Womens health and do-
mestic violence against women. Initial results on prevalence, health
outcomes and womensresponses. Geneva, Switzerland: World
Health Organization.
WHO. (2016). Fact sheet on violence against women. Geneva: World
Health Organization. Retrieved from
mediacentre/factsheets/fs239/en/. Accessed 25 August 2017.
Yount, K. M., & Carrera, J. S. (2006). Domestic violence against married
women in Cambodia. Social Forces, 85(1), 355387.
Zhang, T., Hoddenbagh, J., McDonald, S., & Scrim, K. (2012). An esti-
mation of the economic impact of spousal violence in Canada, 2009.
Canada: Department of Justice Canada.
J Fam Viol (2018) 33:315323 323
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Terms and Conditions
Springer Nature journal content, brought to you courtesy of Springer Nature Customer Service Center GmbH (“Springer Nature”).
Springer Nature supports a reasonable amount of sharing of research papers by authors, subscribers and authorised users (“Users”), for small-
scale personal, non-commercial use provided that all copyright, trade and service marks and other proprietary notices are maintained. By
accessing, sharing, receiving or otherwise using the Springer Nature journal content you agree to these terms of use (“Terms”). For these
purposes, Springer Nature considers academic use (by researchers and students) to be non-commercial.
These Terms are supplementary and will apply in addition to any applicable website terms and conditions, a relevant site licence or a personal
subscription. These Terms will prevail over any conflict or ambiguity with regards to the relevant terms, a site licence or a personal subscription
(to the extent of the conflict or ambiguity only). For Creative Commons-licensed articles, the terms of the Creative Commons license used will
We collect and use personal data to provide access to the Springer Nature journal content. We may also use these personal data internally within
ResearchGate and Springer Nature and as agreed share it, in an anonymised way, for purposes of tracking, analysis and reporting. We will not
otherwise disclose your personal data outside the ResearchGate or the Springer Nature group of companies unless we have your permission as
detailed in the Privacy Policy.
While Users may use the Springer Nature journal content for small scale, personal non-commercial use, it is important to note that Users may
use such content for the purpose of providing other users with access on a regular or large scale basis or as a means to circumvent access
use such content where to do so would be considered a criminal or statutory offence in any jurisdiction, or gives rise to civil liability, or is
otherwise unlawful;
falsely or misleadingly imply or suggest endorsement, approval , sponsorship, or association unless explicitly agreed to by Springer Nature in
use bots or other automated methods to access the content or redirect messages
override any security feature or exclusionary protocol; or
share the content in order to create substitute for Springer Nature products or services or a systematic database of Springer Nature journal
In line with the restriction against commercial use, Springer Nature does not permit the creation of a product or service that creates revenue,
royalties, rent or income from our content or its inclusion as part of a paid for service or for other commercial gain. Springer Nature journal
content cannot be used for inter-library loans and librarians may not upload Springer Nature journal content on a large scale into their, or any
other, institutional repository.
These terms of use are reviewed regularly and may be amended at any time. Springer Nature is not obligated to publish any information or
content on this website and may remove it or features or functionality at our sole discretion, at any time with or without notice. Springer Nature
may revoke this licence to you at any time and remove access to any copies of the Springer Nature journal content which have been saved.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Springer Nature makes no warranties, representations or guarantees to Users, either express or implied
with respect to the Springer nature journal content and all parties disclaim and waive any implied warranties or warranties imposed by law,
including merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose.
Please note that these rights do not automatically extend to content, data or other material published by Springer Nature that may be licensed
from third parties.
If you would like to use or distribute our Springer Nature journal content to a wider audience or on a regular basis or in any other manner not
expressly permitted by these Terms, please contact Springer Nature at
... The identified sexual violence (12.3%) in our study is higher than in studies conducted in Nepal (24) and Mexico, (2) but it is lower than in a study with Thai women. (25) Sexual violence rarely occurs isolated, there is also risk factor for several health problems among women, with lasting repercussions in their lives. (3) Among the most frequent types of sexual violence, forced sexual intercourse was identified. ...
... (3) The same pattern was also observed in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Peru, Samoa, Egypt (1) and Thailand. (25) The consideration of a possible justification to the violence suffered denotes attitudes of submission and conformism of the woman in relation to her partner, which confirmed the second hypothesis of this study, since continuous submission over the years, decreases self-esteem and the ability to think and react. (27) For this reason, the hope of ending of the situation of violence gives way to conformism. ...
Objective: To determine the prevalence and types of violence suffered by women and to identify the gender attitudes related to the situation. Methods: This was a descritive, cross-sectional study incluiding 343 women who were assisted at the Brazilian Public Health System in countryside city in northeastern of Brazil. All participants were volunteers and they invited to participate during consultation at a Basic Health Unit. As participants, they filled out the World Health Organization Violence Against Women Questionnaire and responded to a sociodemographic questionnaire. Results: The victims were, on average, 20.3 years old, and 53.2% of them were married. There was a prevalence of 52.9% of psychological violence, 30.5% of physical violence, and 12.3% of sexual violence. Participants reported alcoholism (67%) and jealousy (60.8%) as triggers to violence. The main psychological abuses were insults and humiliation. In terms of physical violence, the major ones were pushes and slaps. The sexual violence most reportedwere sexual intercourse against the will of the woman and sexual intercourse because of fear of the partner. A portion of the participants justified violence due to women's infidelity, refusal to have sex, and disobedience to her husband. Conclusion: Education in gender equality as a measure of opposition to the culture of female subjugation can reflect on the resignification of the violence suffered by them, and not on blaming the victim of violence by an intimate partner.
... Our study showed that partner using illicit drugs increased the women's chance of suffering physical violence. This association was also found in other studies 27,28 . Women who are victims of violence indicated the use of alcohol and/or other drugs as a triggering factor for the aggressions, since they occurred when the partner was under the influence of these substances. ...
Full-text available
Objetive: To estimate the prevalence of psychological, physical, and sexual violence perpetrated against women by their intimate partner (IP) in Quilombola communities located in Espírito Santo State, Brazil. Methods: The data is from a population-based cross-sectional study of Quilombola women conducted from 2017 to 2018. In-person interviews collected information on women's sociodemographic characteristics, behaviors, and their experience of violence perpetrated by their IP. The analysis used chi-square test and hierarchical logistic regression. Results: 219 women (94.8% of the invited ones) agreed to participate in the study. 59.0% (95%CI: 5.25-65.5) reported psychological violence; 41% (95%CI: 34.5-47.5) physical violence; and 8.2% (95%CI: 4.6-11.8) sexual violence. Psychological violence was associated with having three or more sexual partners in life, when compared to those who had up to two partners (p = 0,009), and previous violence involving other people outside of family increased the chance of suffering psychological violence by an IP more than nine times (p ≤ 0.001). Regarding physical violence, the association with use of barrier contraception (p = 0.031) and having a partner with other sexual partners (p = 0.024) were protective factors for IP violence. Having 3 or more sexual partners in the last 12 months (p = 0.006), partner using illicit drugs (p = 0,006), and alcoholism in the family (p = 0,001), increased the chance of suffer physical violence by the partner. Sexual violence perpetrated by the IP was associated with miscarriage (p = 0.016), partner using drugs (p = 0.020), and gynecological symptoms (p = 0.045). Conclusions: These results showed the high frequency of intimate partner violence in Quilombola women and highlight the importance of reducing social and race inequities for interrupting the culture of violence against women.
... Thailand is a patriarchal society where women remain relatively disempowered (Mekrungruengkul, 2011;Ratanakosol, 2014); nearly one in five report past-year IPV (Chuemchit et al., 2018) and 44% of physical and/or sexual violence in their lifetime (UNFPA, 2021). ...
Full-text available
Aim Using the theory of planned behaviour, the aim of this study was to examine predictors of intention to screen patients for intimate partner violence among Thai nursing students. Methods We employed a cross‐sectional, anonymous online survey study with convenience sampling of senior nursing students from across Thailand in April 2019. We administered the Intimate Partner Violence Screening Intention, Nursing Students, a 36‐item tool, and analysed relationships between students' intentions and attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioural control towards intimate partner violence screening. PROCESS was used to test mediation analyses. Results Of N = 639 respondents. Most (90%) reported intention to screen patients for intimate partner violence. Approximately 41% reported having no intimate partner violence training in their nursing school. Results of the multiple logistic analysis showed that attitudes (OR: 8.5; 95% CI 1.2–4.6) and subjective norms (OR: 4.4; 95% CI 1.4–4.6) significantly predicted intention, whereas perceived behavioural control (OR: 1.7; 95% CI 0.5–4.9) did not. Moreover, attitudes and subjective norm significantly mediated the association between providing a screening tool at clinical sites, and intention. Conclusions Attitudes and subjective norms were significant predictors of intention of intimate partner violence screening. However, participants lacked adequate role models and training. Future research should improve the predictive power of the framework by integrating additional constructs such as the availability of screening tools, the presence of role models, to design and evaluate effective training and support for future nurses to address intimate partner violence in practice. Impacts It is time to seriously consider integrating intimate partner violence content and training into the Thai nursing curriculum, and address the policies, guidelines, and practice culture. Patient or Public Contribution The study was designed to examine predictors of intention to screen patients for intimate partner violence. Thai senior nursing students were contributed in the design and conduct of the study. However, the study did not include input from the public or the intended participants.
... DV occurs in all countries, but its prevalence varies greatly across the world and even within sub-Saharan Africa [5,6]. For instance, it is 28.8% and 15% in Bangladesh and Thailand respectively [7,8]. Moreover, in Africa 78.0% in somewhere in Ethiopia [9], 42.7% in Zimbabwe [10], 67.2% in north-central Nigeria [11], and 76.92% in Senegal [12]. ...
Full-text available
Background: Domestic violence (DV) against women is a global issue that affects women in all countries and is a significant contributor to their poor health. Women who have experienced DV, in particular, suffer from the gynecological, nervous system, and stress-related issues. Despite such devastating implications, there is a paucity of data on the prevalence of DV and its associated factors among married reproductive-age women in Cameroon. Method: The data were analyzed by using STATA version 14 from a demographic and health survey conducted in Cameroon in 2018. Both bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were done. Statistical significance was determined using a p-value of less than 0.05 and a 95% confidence range. Result: A total of 4,903 ever-married women were included in the study. The mean age ± standard deviation, of the participants was 31.3 (± 8.4) years with an age range of 15-49 years. The prevalence of DV among ever-married Cameroonian women was 30.5% with 95%CI (29.3%, 31.8%). Women's educational attainment (higher educational level) (AOR = 0.58, 95% CI (0.37, 0.92), p value = 0.02), Husband's educational level (husbands who attended primary educational level (AOR = 1.30, 95% CI (1.01, 1.68), p value = 0.04), a woman who had media exposure regarding DV ( AOR = 0.83, 95% CI (0.0, 0.99), p value = 0.04), a woman whose husband drinks alcohol (AOR = 3.00, 95% CI (2.56, 3.53), p value < 0.001), and the region where the women reside (center without Yaoundé (AOR = 2.48, 95% CI (1.75, 3.52), p value < 0.001), west (AOR = 1.49, 95% CI (1.05, 2.11), p value = 0.02), South (AOR = 1.89, 95% CI (1.31, 2.72), p-value = 0.001), and Yaoundé (AOR = 1.65. 95% CI (1.14, 2.39), p value = 0.009) were factors that were significantly associated to DV committed by a husband in the previous 12 months against ever-married women. Conclusion: The present study revealed that the prevalence of DV among ever-married women in Cameroon is high. Women's educational level, husband's educational level, husband's alcohol drinking status, women's exposure to mass-media about DV, and the region where the woman resides in the country were factors significantly associated with DV.
... Among our participants 17.5% had any types of intimate partner violence, which agrees with the findings of a previous report showing a 15% prevalence rate of intimate partner violence in Thailand (Chuemchit et al., 2018). A recent meta-analysis showed that pregnant women with probable depression reported increased odds of having experienced intimate partner violence during their lifetime, the past year, and during pregnancy (Howard et al., 2013). ...
Background Few studies examined the contributions of childhood adversities, intimate partner violence and social support to antenatal depression (AD). This study aims to 1) evaluate association of these psychosocial factors with AD symptoms in pregnancy; and 2) examine the mediating effect of social support on the relationship between psychosocial stressors and AD symptoms. Methods Participants were 120 pregnant women aged from 18 to 49 in less than 16 gestational weeks and attending at Antenatal Care Center at Khon Kaen hospital, Thailand. AD symptoms were assessed by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Childhood adversities, intimate partner violence and social support were measured using the Adverse Childhood Experiences Questionnaire (ACE questionnaire), Abuse Assessment Screen (AAS), and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). Results We found that the EPDS score was significantly and positively associated with adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and negatively with social support. Partial Least Square analysis showed that 49.1% of the variance in the depressive subdomain of the EPDS score was predicted by ACEs, namely psychological and physical abuse and neglect, emotional or physical abuse by the partner, unplanned pregnancy, and no satisfaction with their relationship. The effects of adverse childhood experience due to neglect on the EDPS score was mediated by social support by friends. Limitations ACEs were assessed retrospectively and, therefore, may be susceptible to recall bias. Conclusion Prenatal depression scores are to a large extent predicted by psychological distress as indicated by early lifetime trauma, abuse by partner, relation satisfaction, and implications of unintended pregnancy.
p> Background: Domestic violence (DV) is a health problem that often occurs in women in the community. Violence that is often experienced by women is physical violence, psychological violence and sexual violence. Domestic violence has a negative impact on women, namely a decrease in health status and mental disorders. Women who are victims of domestic violence who have mental health problems are at risk of causing child rearing disorders. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to explore the experience of parenting by mothers of domestic violence victims. Methods: This study uses a qualitative method with a phenomenological approach. The data collection process was carried out using a semi-structured interview method. The sampling technique used snowball sampling. The characteristics of the participants in this study were women who were victims of domestic violence who had children who were still married or divorced. The participants in this study were 7 women victims of domestic violence who had children. The data analysis used is thematic analysis using Nvivo 12 software. Results: There are 4 main themes in this study. The themes raised were causes of domestic violence (financial quarrel and cheating husband), the role of parenting by mothers of domestic violence victims, fulfilling the psychological needs of children by mothers of domestic violence victims, and the application of rules and punishments for children by mothers of domestic violence victims. Conclusions: This study concludes that mothers who are victims of domestic violence continue to provide positive parenting for their children by taking care of their children, meeting their needs and guiding their children. Health services need to develop a screening program for victims of domestic violence to detect cases of domestic violence in the community. Programs for developing parenting patterns or good parent-child relationships also need to be carried out, especially for families at risk or experiencing domestic violence so that mothers of domestic violence victims continue to provide positive parenting for their children.</em
Full-text available
Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is the most common type of domestic violence often used by men against their wives. Due to the destructive and widespread social and health consequences of IPV, the present study aimed to investigate the prevalence and related factors of IPV among married women in Garmsar, Iran. Methods: Using multi-stage clusters sampling method, this cross-sectional study included 400 married women in Garmsar, Iran. The data collection process was conducted during October and December 2019 using a researcher-made questionnaire. The content validity of the questionnaire was confirmed using content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (CVI) indicators (0.85 and 0.88, respectively). Also, the reliability was confirmed by examining the internal consistency and obtaining a score of 0.93 for Cronbach's alpha. Descriptive and analytical statistics were performed using t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey's post-hoc test. Results: Most participants were in the age range of 20-40 years (mean age: 34.9 years). The overall exposure of women to IPV was 56.11%. In addition, the most prevalent types of IPV included legal (24%), social (24%), financial (22%), verbal (16%), physical (13%), emotional (12%), and sexual (11%). The effective factors on the prevalence of IPV included number of children, education level, occupation, and age (P less than 0.05). Conclusions: We witnessed that women living in Garmsar faced different types of IPV and their overall exposure to this phenomenon was higher than the national and global average. To resolve the problem, the following measurements are recommended: a careful investigation of the reasons for the spread of IPV, implementing interventions based on reliable evidence, and serious cooperation of the experts and relevant governmental and non-governmental institutions, particularly citizens.
Full-text available
Background: Domestic violence is one of the largest silent problems in the world. Women, children, and elderly individuals often fall victims to family members who use alcohol. However, there is lack of scientific evidence on alcohol consumption and domestic violence among Lahu hill tribe families. Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of family violence, violence against women, and alcohol-related harm to children and elderly individuals and to determine the correlations between alcohol consumption and family violence among Lahu tribe families in northern Thailand. Method: A cross-sectional study was applied to collect data from participants living in 10 randomly selected villages from the list of Lahu villages in Chiang Rai Province, Thailand. A validated questionnaire and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test were used to collect information from the participants in private and confidential rooms at a community hall between March and August 2019. Data were described and tested for correlation at the significance levels of α = 0.05 and 0.01. Findings: A total of 350 of 719 recruited Lahu families participated in the study (response rate = 48.7%). Among female participants, 22.3% reported history of sexual harassment and 4.1% had been forced to have sex. Children and elderly individuals reported several experiences with people who had used alcohol in the past year; 6.4% had been left to live alone, 5.0% experienced financial neglect, and 1.8% had been neglected while sick. In a correlation analysis, it was found that age (r = -0.02, p value < 0.009), education (r = 0.15, p value < 0.047), marital status (r = 0.25, p value < 0.001), and religion (r = 0.20, p value < 0.008) were significantly correlated with verbal arguments among family members. Experience of sexual harassment was correlated with the presence of a drinker in the family (r = 0.22, p value < 0.001). Conclusion: Government and relevant agencies should cooperate to reduce the consumption of alcohol among Lahu men. Moreover, a specific training program to personally improve one's skill in responding to domestic violence among children, women, and elderly individuals should also be developed and implemented in Lahu communities.
Full-text available
Objectives: To determine the association between child abuse and intimate partner violence victimization among married or cohabiting Peruvian women aged 18 years old or older. Methods: Cross-sectional study analyzing secondary data from the National Survey on Social Relationships 2015. To find the association between child abuse and intimate partner violence victimization, a multinomial logistic regression adjusted for possible confounding variables was performed. Results: Data from 1,084 married and cohabiting women were included. The prevalence of child abuse was 49.6% (95%CI 45.8-53.3) and the prevalence of intimate partner violence victimization was 64.2% (95%CI 60.5-67.8). An association was found between child abuse and intimate partner violence victimization (relative risk ratios 5.72, 95%CI 3.71-8.83). Conclusion: Married or cohabiting women in Peru who experienced childhood maltreatment are more likely to experience intimate partner violence in adulthood .
Full-text available
Purpose of review: The purpose of this study was to review the literature on perinatal intimate partner violence, focusing on recent knowledge to guide mental health professionals on the best approaches to identify and treat women exposed to perinatal intimate partner violence. Recent findings: Risk factors have been broadened from individual victim and perpetrator factors to include relationship, community, and societal factors which interact together. Better information is now available on how to identify, document, and treat women exposed to violence around the time of conception, pregnancy, and the postpartum period. Recent information helps psychiatrists and other mental health professionals assist women exposed to violence related to the perinatal period; however, further research is needed to provide improved evidence for optimal interventions for better patient outcomes.
Full-text available
The importance of a sound research strategy for measuring and understanding violence against women cross-culturally is well recognized. However, the value of specialized interviewer training to attain these data is not always fully appreciated. This article describes interviewer selection and training in the World Health Organization (WHO) Multi-Country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence and highlights their importance. Such training ensures high-quality data and cross-country comparability, protects the safety of respondents and interviewers, and increases the impact of the study. Moreover, women are not only willing to share experiences with trained and empathetic interviewers but also find the interview a positive experience.
Full-text available
This article describes a revised Conflict Tactics Scales (the CTS2) to measure psychological and physical attacks on a partner in a marital, cohabiting, or dating relationship; and also use of negotiation. The CTS2 has (a) additional items to enhance content validity and reliability; (b) revised wording to increase clarity and specificity; (c) better differentiation between minor and severe levels of each scale; (d) new scales to measure sexual coercion and physical injury; and (e) a new format to simplify administration and reduce response sets. Reliability ranges from .79 to .95. There is preliminary evidence of construct validity.
The majority of IPV research has originated from western countries and neglected to examine cultural influences.We meta-analyzed the strength of various well-established risk markers (demographic, individual-level and relational) for male-perpetrated IPV across different cultures.Using Hofstede, Hofstede, and Minkov's (2010) individualism scale, we grouped studies from countries into individualist and collectivist categories, and then accounted for the influence of the large number of U.S.-based studies, by creating 3 groups:U.S., Individualistic, and Collectivist.Risk markers across collectivist and U.S. groups had similar effect sizes across while risk markers in the U.S. had larger effect sizes than those found in the international individualist countries.Our findings suggest that if a comprehensive understanding of IPV perpetration is to be achieved, cultural context cannot be ignored.
Introduction: Violence against women is an increasingly serious problem that is endemic worldwide and affects all ages—the unborn, girls, and young and elderly adults. In particular, inter-partner violence (IPV) and intimate partner femicide (IPF) have substantial costs in human suffering and health and justice-related societal costs. This chapter will examine the reasons, costs and consequences of IPV and IPF in Canada and the USA. Main Body: IPV refers to mistreatment by a marital, common-law, or same sex partner. It may happen at any time during a relationship, including while it is breaking down, or after separation. Women are almost eight times more likely to be abused by an intimate partner than men, and 30 % of women currently or previously married have experienced at least one incident of physical or sexual violence. There are a number of proposed motivations for both IPV and IPF including patriarchy, control, estrangement, and social issues. There are enormous societal costs of IPV in Canada, as well as physical and emotional consequences to the women. IPF, murder of women by their intimate partner or ex-partner, is disturbing. There are a number of reasons why abused women delay leaving their abusive relationships including lack of housing and support and fear of their abusive partner, and the justice system. Positive steps to reduce IPV and IPF include protective laws, shelters, and Domestic Violence Courts and Impact of Family Violence Conference reports, a 5-year initiative organized by Social Services Network looking at the impact of family violence from a South Asian Perspective. Discussion: IPV and IPF are serious problems for both the women involved and the society. There is support for change but more needs to be done. Implications: We address the relevance of the above issues and make recommendations for addressing the serious problem of IPV against women.
We evaluate the effects of marital resources and early-life experiences on recent domestic violence and attitudes about wife abuse among 2,074 married Cambodian women. Household standard of living was negatively associated with physical domestic violence. Women with 8-13 fewer years of schooling than their husbands more often experienced physical and psychological domestic violence. Women with more living children more often experienced physical domestic violence and justified wife beating. Having surviving parents and siblings was not associated with domestic violence nor with attitudes about wife beating. Women reporting higher paternal schooling, urban childhood residence and domestic violence against their mothers had higher odds of experiencing physical and psychological domestic violence. Findings underscore the effects of marital resources and early-life experiences on domestic violence in Cambodia.
Using data from a telephone survey of 8,000 U.S. men and 8,000 U.S. women, this study compares the prevalence and consequences of violence perpetrated against men and women by marital and opposite-sex cohabiting partners. The study found that married/cohabiting women reported significantly more intimate perpetrated rape, physical assault, and stalking than did married/cohabiting men, whether the time period considered was the respondent's lifetime or the 12 months preceding the survey. Women also reported more frequent and longer lasting victimization, fear of bodily injury, time lost from work, injuries, and use of medical, mental health, and justice system services.