Human activity recognition is bringing much attention because of its applications in many areas like health care, adaptive interfaces and a smart environment. Today's smartphone is well equipped with advanced processor, more memory, powerful battery and built-in sensors. This provides an opportunity to open up new areas of data mining for activity recognition of Daily Living. In this paper, the benchmark dataset is considered for this work is acquired from the WISDM laboratory, which is available in public domain. We performed experiment using AdaBoost.M1 algorithm with Decision Stump, Hoeffding Tree, Random Tree, J48, Random Forest and REP Tree to classify six activities of daily life by using Weka tool. Then we also see the test output from weka experimenter for these six classifiers. We found the using Adaboost,M1 with Random Forest, J.48 and REP Tree improves overall accuracy. We showed that the difference in accuracy for Random Forest, REP Tree and J48 algorithms compared to Decision Stump, and Hoeffding Tree is statistically significant. We also show that the accuracy of these algorithms compared to Decision Stump, and Hoeffding Tree is high, so we can say that these two algorithms achieved a statistically significantly better result than the Decision Stump, and Hoeffding Tree and Random Tree baseline.
Figures - uploaded by
Kishor WalseAuthor contentAll figure content in this area was uploaded by Kishor Walse
Content may be subject to copyright.