ArticlePDF Available

Overnight fasting compromises exercise intensity and volume during sprint interval training but improves high-intensity aerobic endurance



Background: The combined effects of sprint interval training (SIT) and exercising in the fasted state are unknown. We compared the effects of SIT with exogenous carbohydrate supplementation (SITCHO) and SIT following overnight fast (SITFast) on aerobic capacity (peak oxygen consumption: V̇ O2peak) and high-intensity aerobic endurance (time-to-exhaustion at 85% V̇ O2peak [T85%]). Methods: Twenty male cyclists were randomized to SITCHO and SITFast. Both groups performed 30-second all-out cycling followed by 4-minute active recovery 3 times per week for 4 weeks, with the number of sprint bouts progressing from 4 to 7. Peak power output (PPO) and total mechanical work were measured for each sprint interval bout. The SITCHO group performed exercise sessions following breakfast and consumed carbohydrate drink during exercise, whereas the SITFast group performed exercise sessions following overnight fast and consumed water during exercise. Before and after training, V̇ O2peak and T85% were assessed. Blood glucose, non-esterified fatty acids, insulin and glucagon concentrations were measured during T85%. Results: Overall PPO and mechanical work were lower in SITFast than SITCHO (3664.9 vs. 3871.7 Joules/kg; p=0.021 and 10.6 vs. 9.9 Watts/kg; p=0.010, respectively). Post- training V̇ O2peak did not differ between groups. Baseline-adjusted post-training T85% was longer in SITFast compared to SITCHO (19.7 ± 3.0 vs. 16.6 ± 3.0 minutes, ANCOVA p=0.038) despite no changes in circulating energy substrates or hormones. Conclusions: Our results suggest that SITFast compromises exercise intensity and volume but still can have a greater impact on the ability to sustain high-intensity aerobic endurance exercise compared to SITCHO.
Overnight fasting compromises exercise intensity and volume during sprint interval
training but improves high-intensity aerobic endurance
Tasuku Terada1, Saeed R Toghi Eshghi2, Yilina Liubaoerjijin2, Michael Kennedy2, Etienne
Myette-Côté3, Kevin Fletcher2, Normand G. Boulé2*.
1Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Alberta,
Edmonton, AB Canada T6G 2G4; 2Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, 1-02 Li Ka
Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, Edmonton, AB Canada T6G 2E1; 3School of
Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC Canada
V1V 1V7
Running title: Fasted vs. fed sprint interval training (SIT)
Address for correspondence: Dr. Normand G. Boulé, University of Alberta, Faculty of
Physical Education and Recreation, 1-02 Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation
Edmonton, AB Canada, T6G 2E1; Phone: (780) 492- 4695; E-mail:
Word count: 3501
BACKGROUND: The combined effects of sprint interval training (SIT) and exercising in the
fasted state are unknown. We compared the effects of SIT with exogenous carbohydrate
supplementation (SITCHO) and SIT following overnight fast (SITFast) on aerobic capacity (peak
oxygen consumption: V
̇O2peak) and high-intensity aerobic endurance (time-to-exhaustion at 85%
̇O2peak [T85%]). METHODS: Twenty male cyclists were randomized to SITCHO and SITFast.
Both groups performed 30-second all-out cycling followed by 4-minute active recovery 3 times
per week for 4 weeks, with the number of sprint bouts progressing from 4 to 7. Peak power
output (PPO) and total mechanical work were measured for each sprint interval bout. The SITCHO
group performed exercise sessions following breakfast and consumed carbohydrate drink during
exercise, whereas the SITFast group performed exercise sessions following overnight fast and
consumed water during exercise. Before and after training, V
̇O2peak and T85% were assessed.
Blood glucose, non-esterified fatty acids, insulin and glucagon concentrations were measured
during T85%. RESULTS: Overall PPO and mechanical work were lower in SITFast than SITCHO
(3664.9 vs. 3871.7 Joules/kg; p=0.021 and 10.6 vs. 9.9 Watts/kg; p=0.010, respectively). Post-
training V
̇O2peak did not differ between groups. Baseline-adjusted post-training T85% was longer
in SITFast compared to SITCHO (19.7 ± 3.0 vs. 16.6 ± 3.0 minutes, ANCOVA p=0.038) despite no
changes in circulating energy substrates or hormones. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that
SITFast compromises exercise intensity and volume but still can have a greater impact on the
ability to sustain high-intensity aerobic endurance exercise compared to SITCHO.
Key words: exercise, aerobic power, submaximal performance, Wingate, time to fatigue,
carbohydrate supplementation
Aerobic capacity (i.e., peak oxygen consumption; V
̇O2peak) and high-intensity aerobic endurance
(i.e., ability to sustain work at intensities above 85% V
̇O2peak) constitute fundamental aspects of
performance associated with endurance sports.1 Thus, training strategies to improve these
parameters continue to be an important area of research in sport science. Traditionally,
continuous aerobic endurance training with aerobic intervals (>4 minutes in length) has been
used to increase aerobic capacity and endurance in trained athletes.2-4 However, anaerobic sprint
interval training (SIT) of shorter duration (30 seconds) has recently emerged and adopted as an
alternative strategy to induce rapid muscular aerobic adaptations, such as increased muscle
glycogen content, oxidative enzyme expression, and mitochondrial biogenesis.5,6 SIT
supplemented into regular training has been shown to increase V
̇O2peak in well-trained athletes7
and high-intensity aerobic endurance in recreationally active individuals.8,9
Modification to nutritional availability has also been proposed as a potent strategy to
modulate exercise training responses. It has been well established that carbohydrate
supplementation can acutely increase aerobic cycling endurance.10 However, training with
reduced carbohydrate availability have advantages in enhancing glycogen content11-13 and
activating signaling pathways12 that lead to the activation of aerobic enzymes14 to a greater extent
than the same exercise performed with ample carbohydrate supplementation. Aerobic exercise
training under restricted exogenous carbohydrate availability has been shown to improve
supramaximal cycling capacity15 and time trial performance16 to a greater extent than the same
training performed with high carbohydrate availability. Thus, while exercise with increased
carbohydrate availability can have positive immediate effects on aerobic performance and/or
recovery, high carbohydrate availability during exercise training may hamper some of the
important adaptive responses induced by exercise training.
To date, the effects of SIT and fasted-state exercise have been studied independently.
While both types of training appear to share overlapping mechanisms for muscular adaptations
(e.g., increased muscular glycogen content and aerobic enzymatic activities), it is unknown if the
combination of SIT and fasted-state exercise training (SITFast) can induce greater improvements
in aerobic capacity and high-intensity aerobic endurance compared to SIT performed under
ample carbohydrate condition (SITCHO). The primary purpose of the study was to compare the
effects of SITCHO and SITFast on aerobic capacity and high-intensity aerobic endurance. The
secondary purpose was to compare the effects of SITCHO and SITFast on circulating substrates and
hormone concentrations involved in energy metabolism during high-intensity aerobic endurance
cycling. We hypothesized that SITFast would induce greater increases in aerobic capacity and
high-intensity endurance compared to SITCHO.
Material and methods
Male cyclists were recruited through advertisement. The inclusion criteria for the study were: 1)
cycle more than 3 hours per week; 2) non-smokers; 3) not currently performing fasted-state
training; 4) between 18 and 45 years of age; and 5) able to train in the morning 3 days per week.
We recruited participants who cycle more than 3 hours per week to minimize changes in cycling
economy over the exercise training period. Potential participants completed a questionnaire to
verify their eligibility. Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q)17 was also completed
to screen for any contraindications to performing high-intensity exercise. Participants gave
written informed consent prior to participation. All experimental procedures performed were in
accordance with Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by University of Alberta Health
Research Ethics Board.
Experimental design
A randomized parallel group trial was conducted. After screening for eligibility, baseline aerobic
capacity (V
̇O2peak) was assessed, followed by high-intensity aerobic endurance cycling (time-to-
exhaustion at 85% V
̇O2peak [T85%]) on a subsequent day at least 48 hours apart. Participants were
then randomized to either SITCHO or SITFast by a researcher not involved in the study. Without
being blinded to the conditions, both groups performed 3 training sessions per week with 48-72
hours between each session for 4 weeks (e.g., training on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday
morning). After successful completion of 4-week SIT, V
̇O2peak and T85% tests were repeated
using the same protocols used in baseline testing. The post-training T85% took place
approximately 72 hours following the last day of SIT. The post-training assessment of V
occurred on a subsequent day, at least 48 hours apart. Overview of experimental protocol is
summarized in Figure 1. All exercise testing and sessions were completed on a stationary bike
ergometer (Monark, Ergomedic 894E, Varberg, Sweden).
Training protocols
All participants trained 3 days per week for 4 weeks in controlled laboratory conditions. Training
sessions were interspersed with at least 48 hours of recovery. The progressive SIT training
included 30 seconds of all-out cycling efforts18 with a resistance equivalent to 0.075 kg x body
mass (kg), separated by 4 minutes of unloaded pedaling. Participants performed 4 bouts per
session in week 1, 5 bouts per session in week 2, 6 bouts per session in week 3, and 7 bouts per
session in week 4 (Figure 1). Before each high-intensity bout, an instruction was given to
increase pedaling speed as high as possible, and the appropriate load was applied promptly.
Participants were given verbal encouragement to maintain maximal pedaling speed throughout
the 30-second period.
Participants in the SITCHO group completed 3-day dietary record (breakfast only) before
participating in SIT. If breakfast carbohydrate intake was <2.5g/body mass (kg),19 participants
were instructed to supplement carbohydrate intake by adding cereal and/or orange juice to their
breakfast. Breakfast was consumed at least 1 hour prior to each training session to minimize
gastrointestinal distress. During each training session, 591 mL Gatorade (0 g fat, 35g
carbohydrate, and 0 g protein; Pepsico Beverages Canada, 5205 Satellite Drive Mississauga, ON,
Canada) was also provided to the SITCHO group. The SITFast group reported to the laboratory
after ≥10 hours of overnight fast, and consumed only water during exercise sessions.
To examine if restricted exogenous carbohydrate availability compromised training
volume and power output (PO), we measured peak power output (PPO), mean PO, and fatigue
index during each sprint interval bout. Reflective makers were placed on the flywheel, and a
photo cell interfaced to a computer determined the number of flywheel revolutions during a
sprint interval bout using a custom designed software program. PO was calculated as the product
of resistance and flywheel revolutions every 0.1 second. PPO was determined from the first 5
seconds,20,21 and fatigue index was computed from the difference between 5-second PPO and the
PO during the last 5 seconds of the test divided by the PPO multiplied by 100.18 Mechanical
work of each sprint interval bout was quantified for each participant by multiplying the mean PO
by total sprint time (i.e., work = Joules/seconds x 30 seconds). Weekly training volume was
calculated by summing mechanical work of all sprint intervals performed in the week, which was
adjusted for participants’ body mass to allow between-group comparison. PPO was also adjusted
for different body mass.
Aerobic capacity (V
̇O2peak) test
Participants performed an incremental test to exhaustion on a cycle ergometer at a self-selected
cadence to determine V
̇O2peak and VT using a TrueMax® (ParvoMedics, Sandy, UT) metabolic
measurement system. First and second VT (VT1 and VT2) were determined as previously
described22 by a researcher blinded to conditions. The initial 3 stages of the incremental test were
2 minutes each, and the weight applied to the flywheel were 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 kg, respectively.
Resistance was increased by adding 0.3 kg per minute thereafter until volitional exhaustion.
̇O2peak was determined as the highest value averaged over 20 seconds before reaching volitional
exhaustion. The cadence, saddle and handle bar positions used for the baseline test were recorded
and reproduced in subsequent tests.
High-intensity aerobic endurance (T85%) test
Endurance performance was defined as the length of time that cycling could be maintained at an
intensity requiring 85% of VO2peak. Participants reported to the laboratory after an overnight fast
(≥10 hours) and were provided with standardized breakfast: a granola bar (8 g fat, 28 g
carbohydrate, and 3 g protein; Nature Valley granola bar, General Mills, Mississauga, ON,
Canada) and meal replacement drink (6 g fat, 32 g carbohydrate, and 9 g protein; Ensure regular,
Abbott, Saint-Laurent, QC, Canada). Participants were given 30 minutes of rest, during which a
catheter was inserted in the antecubital vein. The intravenous line was kept patent with saline
solution flushes. Participants then performed 5-minute warm-up at pedaling resistance
corresponding to 25% of resistance prescribed for the T85% test. The T85% test was performed at
the same cadence selected for the V
̇O2peak test while adjusting workload to match the intensity at
85% of individually determined V
̇O2peak. Participants were blinded to the elapse of time and
remained seated for the entire testing duration. No verbal encouragement was provided. The test
was terminated when cadence fell below the predetermined speed for more than 5 seconds and
followed by 5 minutes cool-down.
Blood samples were collected into a 10-mL EDTA vacutainer tube (Becton, Dickson and
Company, ON, Canada) immediately before warm-up, every 10 minutes during the test, and
immediately following cool-down. Respiratory gases were analysed using metabolic
measurement system between 6th and 9th minutes every 10 minutes to determine the rates of
oxygen consumption (V
̇O2) and carbon dioxide production (V
̇CO2). Rating of perceived
exhaustion (RPE) was recorded immediately before the respiratory gas collection period using
the Borg 6-20 RPE scale.23. Heart rate was also recorded at this time.
Biochemical analyses
Two mL of collected blood samples were transferred into a tube with 6.7 µL aprotinin (Millipore,
MA, USA), and 0.25 mL were transferred into a tube containing 1.0 mL ice-cold 8% perchloric
acid. Aprotinin was added to inhibit proteases known to interfere with the determination of
glucagon concentration, while perchloric acid was added to deproteinize the sample. Tubes were
centrifuged and acquired plasma was cooled and stored in a -80 °C freezer until analysis. NEFA
(Wako Diagnostics, CA, USA), plasma glucose, and lactate concentrations were determined
enzymatically with spectrophotometric assays. Glucagon and insulin concentrations were
measured using a Multi-Spot® Assay System with a Sector® Imager 2400 (Meso Scale
Discovery®, MD, USA). All assays were run in duplicate and mean values were used for
subsequent analyses. The intra-assay coefficient of variation for glucagon, insulin, NEFA,
plasma glucose, and lactate were 6.5%, 4.2%, 5.6%, 4.4%, and 4.0%, respectively.
Statistical analysis
At baseline, independent t-tests were used to compare participant characteristics between SITCHO
and SITFast. While differences did not reach statistical significance, relative V
̇O2peak and T85% in
SITFast were lower compared to SITCHO at baseline (53.1 ± 7.8 vs. 57.3 ± 7.8; p=0.248 and 12.6 ±
8.0 vs. 17.4 ± 7.5; p=0.184, respectively). Typically, poor baseline measures lead to greater
improvements.24 We therefore performed analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) on post-training
measures with baseline measures included as covariates to determine if training outcomes
differed between SITCHO and SITFast.25 These analyses are presented as adjusted means (also
known as least square means) throughout the article. For circulating substrates and hormones, we
separately performed ANCOVA on measures obtained before exercise, during exercise, and after
For the analysis of fatigue index, mechanical work and PPO adjusted for body mass,
weekly measures were compared between SITCHO versus SITFast by using repeated measure
ANOVA. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Normality of residual
distributions was examined with Shapiro-Wilk test. Insulin concentration was log-transformed to
achieve normality. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 23
(IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
Twenty-five participants completed the baseline tests. Of these, 5 withdrew from the study. Two
participants randomized to SITCHO withdrew due to schedule incompatibility. Three participants,
1 from SITCHO and 2 from SITFast withdrew from the study due to severe dizziness and nausea
following the first SIT session. As a result, 9 participants in the SITCHO group and 11 participants
in the SITFast group were included in the analyses. All participants completed 12 exercise training
sessions, except for 1 in SITFast who missed 1 session in the 4th week. There were no significant
differences between SITCHO and SITFast in baseline characteristics, V
̇O2peak, T85%, VT1 or VT2
(Table 1).
Training volume, PPO, and fatigue index
Weekly mean mechanical work and PPO adjusted for body mass, and fatigue index for both
groups are summarized in Figure 2. Repeated measure ANOVA showed that, with an addition of
a sprint interval bout per week, total mechanical work increased every week in both groups
(p<0.001). Overall mechanical work adjusted for body mass was significantly higher in SITCHO
compared to SITFast (3871.7 vs. 3664.9 Joules/kg; p=0.021, Cohen’s d=0.29). Similarly, overall
PPO adjusted for body mass was significantly higher in SITCHO compared to SITFast (10.6 vs. 9.9
Watts/kg; p=0.010, Cohen’s d=0.57). Fatigue index did not differ between the groups.
Aerobic capacity (V
̇O2peak) and VT
There was no difference in post-training V
̇O2peak between SITCHO and SITFast (Figure 3). Pre and
adjusted post-training V
̇O2 at VT1 were 33.7 ± 9.2 vs. 33.7 ± 5.1 mL·O2/kg/min for SITCHO and
30.1 ± 8.2 vs. 33.1 ± 5.9 mL·O2/kg/min for SITFast, respectively. Pre and adjusted post-training
̇O2 at VT2 were 46.3 ± 9.0 vs. 43.8 ± 7.2 mL·O2/kg/min for SITCHO and 42.3 ± 9.0 vs. 43.2 ±
6.7 mL·O2/kg/min for SITFast, respectively. There were no differences in post-training VT1 or
VT2 between groups.
High-intensity aerobic endurance (T85%)
Oxygen consumption expressed as a percentage of baseline V
̇O2peak was 87.8 ± 6.0% and 86.2 ±
4.0% during pre- and post-T85%, respectively, in SITCHO. In SITFast, pre and post %V
̇O2peak were
86.4 ± 7.7% and 89.7 ± 8.4%, respectively. Mean PO for SITCHO and SITFast during T85% were
261.8 ± 23.4 and 261.8 ± 23.4 Watts, respectively. There was no significant difference between
Adjusted mean post-training T85% was significantly longer in SITFast than SITCHO (19.7 ±
3.0 min vs. 16.6 ± 3.0 min, p=0.038, effect size estimated by partial Eta squared=0.230; Figure
4). The rate of perceived exertion, heart rate, or respiratory exchange ratio (RER) did not change
or differ between groups (Table 2). We only analysed RER during the first 10 minutes because
second metabolic cart measures (i.e., between 16-19 minutes) were only available from 6
participants. In addition, because 2 participants reached volitional exhaustion before the first
metabolic cart measurement, these participants were not included in the RER analysis.
Blood sample analyses
The results of blood sample analyses are summarized in Table 2. At baseline, there were no
significant differences in plasma glucose, lactate, NEFA, insulin or glucagon concentrations
before, during, and immediately after T85% tests between SITCHO and SITFast. However, adjusted
glucose and glucagon concentrations measured immediately before the post-training T85% test
were significantly lower in SITFast compared to SITCHO (4.2 ± 0.8 vs. 5.1 ± 0.3 mmol/L, p=0.024,
partial Eta squared=0.28 and 29.5 ± 12.7 vs. 53.2 ± 25.7 pmol/L, p=0.022, partial Eta
squared=0.30). Immediately following the post-training T85% test, adjusted glucose
concentrations were lower in SITFast than SITCHO (5.1 ± 1.1 vs. 6.0 ± 1.0 mmol/L, p=0.011,
partial Eta squared=0.34).
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the effects of sprint interval
training performed under both limited and ample exogenous carbohydrate conditions on aerobic
capacity and high-intensity aerobic endurance. By manipulating exogenous carbohydrate
availability during training, we showed that SIT performed after an overnight fast leads to better
high-intensity aerobic endurance performance compared to SIT performed with additional
carbohydrate intake after adjusting for baseline differences. This may have training implications
for athletes since the ability to sustain power outputs at high intensity (i.e., >85% V
̇O2peak) has
been suggested as a critical determinant factor of success in endurance events.19,26 Interestingly,
the SITFast group increased T85% more than the SITCHO group despite lower body mass-adjusted
mean mechanical work and PPO during training.
Previous studies have shown as little as 6 sessions of SIT over 2 weeks are a potent
stimulus to enhance skeletal muscle buffering capacity, oxidative capacity, and glycogen content
to a similar degree as 90 to 120 minutes of endurance exercise training5 and double time-to-
exhaustion at 80% V
̇O2peak27 in healthy individuals. Our results indicated that performance of
experienced cyclists can be enhanced using very similar protocols with a potential of added
performance benefit by training under fasted state. Exercise intensity in our study during the
T85% test was ~88% V
̇O2peak, which corresponds to the exercise intensity used in a previous study
investigating high-intensity aerobic endurance performance in well-trained competitive cyclists.1
Despite similar exercise intensity relative to individually-determined V
̇O2peak, cycling duration of
the current study were shorter than the previous study (i.e., ~15 minutes at baseline vs. ~45
minutes), possibly due to lower overall training status or aerobic capacity (55.3 ± 7.5 vs. 67.3 ±
3.9 ml·O2/kg/min) in our participants. Despite shorter time-to-exhaustion, our results translate
into an improved capacity to cover additional 1.1 ± 1.7 and 2.1 ± 1.4 km at given exercise
intensity in SITCHO and SITFast groups, respectively. The mean difference of an extra kilometre
performed in the SITFast strengthens the potential benefit of fasted state training on cycling
Our results showing increased high-intensity aerobic endurance despite no changes in
̇O2peak is similar to previous studies in well-trained runners and cyclists.28,29 Considering
previously reported central adaptation (i.e., increased left ventricular mass and stroke volume)
and increased V
̇O2peak in response to higher volume SIT (5 sessions per week for 8 weeks),30 we
suspect that our SIT volume was not sufficient to induce changes in V
̇O2peak. Alternatively,
because changes in V
̇O2peak have predominantly been observed in untrained participants,6,31-35 a
greater training stimulus may be required to induce physiological adaptation in more fit
participants such as ours. Likewise, while a previous study showed increases in VT1 and VT2 in
response to SIT,7 there was no group level changes in threshold in our study in either SITCHO or
SITFast. This discrepancy may also be attributable to lower training volume in our study (i.e., 66
SIT bouts vs. 96 SIT bouts). We found no correlations between the baseline V
̇O2peak and changes
in T85%.
At baseline, there were no differences in the concentrations of circulating hormones and
energy substrates. However, after training, glucose concentrations measured immediately before
and after T85% were significantly lower in SITFast compared to SITCHO. Additionally, glucagon
concentration measured immediately before post-training T85% was also lower in SITFast
compared to SITCHO. We do not have clear explanation on why glucagon concentration was
lower in SITFast than SITCHO following training. However, others have demonstrated that
antecedent episode of increased cortisol concentration36 can blunt counter regulatory responses,
including glucagon, in response to hypoglycaemia on a subsequent day. Thus, repeated episodes
of augmented cortisol concentration induced by fasted-state exercise37 may have suppressed
glucagon concentration following SITFast. Alternatively, higher energy demands on the liver
during SITFast may have increased AMP to ATP ratio in the liver. This could have stimulated
hepatic 5’ AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activity, thereby increasing glucagon
sensitivity in the liver38 and reducing glucagon concentrations. This lower glucagon
concentration is likely to be a contributing factor for lower glucose concentration in SITFast
before post-training T85%.
As acutely manipulating substrate availability can exert profound effects on muscle
energy stores and patterns of fuel metabolism during exercise, when repeated over time such
interventions can have the potential to modulate numerous adaptive processes in skeletal
muscle.39 Our results of longer aerobic cycling endurance following SITFast than SITCHO without
changes in energy substrates mobilization or oxidation rates suggest that the change was due to
unmeasured parameters. While we did not perform muscle biopsy, available evidence has shown
that commencing exercise with limited exogenous carbohydrate intake13,40 or withholding
glucose intake during exercise40,41 increases muscle AMPK activity, which stimulates
downstream regulators, such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ 1α (PGC-1α),42,43 a
protein known to facilitate mitochondrial biogenesis.44-47 Additionally, compared to the same
exercise training under a fed condition, the fasted-state exercise facilitates glycogenolysis,48 and
thereby increases glycogen content to a greater extent once replenished.11,49,50 Altogether, given
that both SIT and fasted-state exercise can enhance oxidative enzyme activities and glycogen
contents, we speculate that the effects of SIT and fasted-state exercise may be additive and
resulted in a greater degree of improvement in T85%.
A limitation of our study includes relatively large heterogeneity in baseline V
̇O2peak and
T85%. We performed ANCOVA to adjust for these baseline differences instead of analysing
percent changes as percent changes are generally more pronounced for participants with poorer
baseline measures. Nonetheless, ANCOVA does not eliminate the possibility that differing
physiological and/or biochemical responses occurred as a result of different starting points.
Additionally, while we instructed participants not to alter their dietary intake, we did not capture
macronutrient contents of their dietary intake during the training period. Thus, the potential
influence of residual confounding arising from different dietary intake cannot be ignored. Lastly,
we were unable to provide mechanisms underpinning performance changes. Further study is
warranted to determine the specific mechanisms that lead to better adaptation.
This study provides some novel information for sport scientists and coaches involved in the
training of athletes. We have demonstrated that performing sprint interval training in a fasted
state enhances actual performance to a greater extent than the same training performed under an
ample carbohydrate condition. These results could be considered a novel ergogenic aid that has
the potential to elevate both team and individual sport performance. Future replication of these
results will affirm the understanding of how energy status can influence adaptation in training
Acknowledgments: This study was supported by grants from the Sport Science Association of
Alberta (SSAA) and University of Alberta, Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, the
Human Performance Funding Award (HPF). The funding sources had no role in design, conduct
or reporting of the study. The authors would like to thank Irina Smith and Ryan St James for
their support with data collection. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Craig Steinback for
his help with participant randomization.
Duality of interest: The authors declare that there is no duality of interest associated with this
Contribution statement: TT, MK, EMC and NGB were responsible for the conception and
design of the study. Collection and assembly of data was carried out by TT, SRTE, YL, MK,
EMC, KF and NGB. Analysis and interpretation of data was carried out by TT, SRTE, YL, and
NGB. TT drafted the article and SRTE, YL, MK, EMC, KF, and NGB critically revised the
article for important intellectual content. TT, SRTE, MK, EMC and NGB obtained funding. All
authors gave final approval for the article to be published.
1. Coyle E, Coggan A, Hopper M, Walters T. Determinants of endurance in well-trained
cyclists. J Appl Physiol 1988;64:2622-2630
2. Neal CM, Hunter AM, Brennan L, O'Sullivan A, Hamilton DL, DeVito G, et al. Six
weeks of a polarized training-intensity distribution leads to greater physiological and
performance adaptations than a threshold model in trained cyclists. J Appl Physiol
2013;114: 461-471
3. Lindsay F, Hawley J, Myburgh K, Schomer H, Noakes T, Dennis S. Improved athletic
performance in highly trained cyclists after interval training. Med Sci Sports Exerc,
4. Seiler K, Kjerland G. Quantifying training intensity distribution in elite endurance
athletes: Is there evidence for an "optimal" distribution? Scand J Med Sci Sports
5. Gibala MJ, Little JP, van Essen M, Wilkin GP, Burgomaster KA., Safdar A, et al. Short-
term sprint interval versus traditional endurance training: Similar initial adaptations in
human skeletal muscle and exercise performance. J Physiol 2006;575:901-911
6. Burgomaster KA, Howarth KR, Phillips SM, Rakobowchuk M, MacDonald MJ, McGee
SL, Gibala MJ. Similar metabolic adaptations during exercise after low volume sprint
interval and traditional endurance training in humans. J Physiol 2008;586:151-160
7. Laursen P, Shing C, Peake J, Coombes J, Jenkins D. Influence of high-intensity interval
training on adaptations in well-trained cyclists. J Strength Cond Res 2005;19:527-533
8. Harmer A, McKenna M, Sutton J, Snow R, Ruell P, Booth J, et al. Skeletal muscle
metabolic and ionic adaptations during intense exercise following sprint training in
humans. J Appl Physiol 2000;89:1793-1803
9. Hazell TJ, MacPherson REK, Gravelle BMR, Lemon PWR. 10 or 30-S sprint interval
training bouts enhance both aerobic and anaerobic performance. Eur J Sport Sci
10. Yaspelkis B, Patterson J, Anderla P, Ding Z, Ivy J. Carbohydrate supplementation spares
muscle glycogen during variable-intensity exercise. J Appl Physiol 1993;75:1477-1485
11. Stannard SR, Buckley AJ, Edge JA, Thompson MW. Adaptations to skeletal muscle with
endurance exercise training in the acutely fed versus overnight-fasted state. J Sci Med
Sport 2010;13:465-469
12. Van Proeyen K, Szlufcik K, Nielens H, Ramaekers M, Hespel P. Beneficial metabolic
adaptations due to endurance exercise training in the fasted state. J Appl Physiol
13. De Bock K, Richter EA, Russell AP, Eijnde BO, Derave W, Ramaekers M, et al.
Exercise in the fasted state facilitates fibre type-specific intramyocellular lipid breakdown
and stimulates glycogen resynthesis in humans. J Physiol 2005;564:649-660
14. Morton JP, Croft L, Bartlett JD, MacLaren DPM, Reilly T, Evans L, et al. Reduced
carbohydrate availability does not modulate training-induced heat shock protein
adaptations but does upregulate oxidative enzyme activity in human skeletal muscle. J
Appl Physiol 2009;106:1513-1521
15. Marquet L, Brisswalter J, Louis J, Tiollier E, Burke LM, Hawley JA, et al. Enhanced
endurance performance by periodization of carbohydrate intake: "Sleep low" strategy.
Med Sci Sports Exerc 2016;48:663-672
16. Cochran AJR, Myslik F, Macinnis MJ, Percival ME, Bishop D, Tarnopolsky MA, et al.
Manipulating carbohydrate availability between twice-daily sessions of high-intensity
interval training over 2 weeks improves time-trial performance. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc
Metab 2015;25: 463-470
17. Warburton D, Jamnik V, Bredin S, Gledhill N. The physical activity readiness
questionnaire (PAR-Q+) and electrical phsyical activity readiness medical examination
(eRAPmed-X+). Health & Fitness Journal of Canada 2011
18. Baror O. The wingate anaerobic test - an update on methodology, reliability and validity.
Sports Med 1987;4:381-394
19. Burke LM. Fueling strategies to optimize performance: Training high or training low?
Scand J Med Sci Sports 2010;20:48-58
20. Forbes SC, Kennedy MD, Boule NB, Bell G. Determination of the optimal load setting
for arm crank anaerobic testing in men and women. Int J Sports Med 2014;35:835-839
21. Mandic S, Quinney H, Bell G. Modification of the wingate anaerobic power test for
rowing: Optimization of the resistance setting. Int J Sports Med 2004;25:409-414
22. Lucia A, Hoyos J, Perez M, Chicharro J. Heart rate and performance parameters in elite
cyclists: A longitudinal study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32:1777-1782
23. Borg GAV. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc
24. Vickers A, Altman D. Statistics notes - analysing controlled trials with baseline and
follow up measurements. BMJ 2001;323:1123-1124
25. Vickers AJ. The use of percentage change from baseline as an outcome in a controlled
trial is statistically inefficient: A simulation study. BMC Med Res Methodol 2001;1:6
26. Joyner MJ, Coyle EF. Endurance exercise performance: The physiology of champions. J
Physiol 2008;586:35-44
27. Burgomaster KA, Hughes SC, Heigenhauser GJF, Bradwell SN, Gibala MJ. Six sessions
of sprint interval training increases muscle oxidative potential and cycle endurance
capacity in humans. J Appl Physiol 2005;98:1985-1990
28. Bangsbo J, Gunnarsson TP, Wendell J, Nybo L, Thomassen M. Reduced volume and
increased training intensity elevate muscle Na+-K+ pump alpha2-subunit expression as
well as short- and long-term work capacity in humans. J Appl Physiol 2009; 107:1771-
29. Laursen P, Blanchard M, Jenkins D. Acute high-intensity interval training improves T-
vent and peak power output in highly trained males. Can J Appl Physiol 2002;27:336-348
30. Matsuo T, Saotome K, Seino S, Shimojo N, Matsushita A, Iemitsu M, et al. Effects of a
low-volume aerobic-type interval exercise on VO2max and cardiac mass. Med Sci Sports
Exerc 2014;46:42-50
31. Willoughby TN, Thomas MPL, Schmale MS, Copeland JL, Hazell TJ. Four weeks of
running sprint interval training improves cardiorespiratory fitness in young and middle-
aged adults. J Sports Sci 2016;34:1207-1214
32. Macpherson REK, Hazell TJ, Olver TD, Paterson DH, Lemon PWR. Run sprint interval
training improves aerobic performance but not maximal cardiac output. Med Sci Sports
Exerc 2011;43:115-122
33. Sandvei M, Jeppesen PB, Stoen L, Litleskare S, Johansen E, Stensrud T, et al. Sprint
interval running increases insulin sensitivity in young healthy subjects. Arch Physiol
Biochem 2012;118:139-147
34. Barnett C, Carey M, Proietto J, Cerin E, Febbraio MA, Jenkins D. Muscle metabolism
during sprint exercise in man: Influence of sprint training. J Sci Med Sport 2004;7:314-
35. Trilk JL, Singhal A, Bigelman KA, Cureton KJ. Effect of sprint interval training on
circulatory function during exercise in sedentary, overweight/obese women. Eur J Appl
Physiol 2011;111:1591-1597
36. Davis S, Shavers C, Costa F, Mosqueda-Garcia R. Role of cortisol in the pathogenesis of
deficient counterregulation after antecedent hypoglycemia in normal humans. J Clin
Invest 1996;98:680-691
37. Galbo H, Holst J, Christensen N. Effect of different diets and of insulin on the hormonal
response to prolonged exercise. Acta Physiol Scand 1979;107:19-32
38. Trefts E, Williams AS, Wasserman DH. Exercise and the regulation of hepatic
metabolism. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 2015;135:203-25
39. Hawley JA. Nutritional strategies to modulate the adaptive response to endurance training.
Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser 2013;75:1-14
40. Akerstrom TCA, Birk JB, Klein DK, Erikstrup C, Plomgaard P, Pedersen BK, et al. Oral
glucose ingestion attenuates exercise-induced activation of 5 '-AMP-activated protein
kinase in human skeletal muscle. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006;342:949-955
41. Civitarese AE, Hesselink MKC, Russell AP, Ravussin E, Schrauwen P. Glucose
ingestion during exercise blunts exercise-induced gene expression of skeletal muscle fat
oxidative genes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2005; 289:E1023-E1029
42. Bartlett JD, Hawley JA, Morton JP. Carbohydrate availability and exercise training
adaptation: Too much of a good thing? Eur J Sport Sci 2015;153-12
43. Margolis LM, Pasiakos SM. Optimizing intramuscular adaptations to aerobic exercise:
Effects of carbohydrate restriction and protein supplementation on mitochondrial
biogenesis. Adv Nutr 2013;4:657-664
44. Jager S, Handschin C, St-Pierre J, Spiegelman BM. AMP-activated protein kinase
(AMPK) action in skeletal muscle via direct phosphorylation of PGC-1alpha. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA 2007;104:12017-12022
45. Zong HH, Ren JM, Young LH, Pypaert M, Mu J, Birnbaum MJ, et al. AMP kinase is
required for mitochondrial biogenesis in skeletal muscle in response to chronic energy
deprivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:15983-15987
46. Hardie DG. Energy sensing by the AMP-activated protein kinase and its effects on
muscle metabolism. Proc Nutr Soc 2011;70:92-99
47. Gibala M. Molecular responses to high-intensity interval exercise. Appl Physiol Nutr
Metab 2009;34:428-432
48. De Bock K, Derave W, Ramaekers M, Richter EA, Hespel P. Fiber type-specific muscle
glycogen sparing due to carbohydrate intake before and during exercise. J Appl Physiol
49. Van Proeyen K, Szlufcik K, Nielens H, Pelgrim K, Deldicque L, Hesselink M, et al.
Training in the fasted state improves glucose tolerance during fat-rich diet. J Physiol
50. Nybo L, Pedersen K, Christensen B, Aagaard P, Brandt N, Kiens B. Impact of
carbohydrate supplementation during endurance training on glycogen storage and
performance. Acta Physiol 2009;197:117-127
Table titles
Table 1. Baseline demographic and aerobic characteristics
Table 2. Pre- and post-training substrate oxidation, energy substrate concentration and hormone
concentrations before, during and after time-to-exhaustion at a workload corresponding to 85%
of baseline V
̇O2peak (T85%)
Figure legends
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of study flow.
SIT: sprint interval training
SITCHO: sprint interval training with breakfast prior to training and carbohydrate during exercise;
SITFast: sprint interval training following an overnight fast. V
̇O2peak: peak oxygen consumption;
T85%: time-to-exhaustion test at 85% V
*The same protocols as baseline tests were used.
Figure 2. a) Mechanical work, b) peak power output, and c) fatigue index over the 4-week
training period.
SITCHO: sprint interval training performed under ample carbohydrate; SITFast: sprint interval
training following an overnight fast. Mechanical work is sum of mechanical work during SIT
only. Peak power output was calculated as the sum of peak power output over number of SIT
performed. *Repeated measures ANOVA showed a significant difference between SITCHO and
SITFast (main effects: p=0.021 and p=0.010, respectively). asignficantly different from week 1;
bsignficantly different from week 1 and 2; csignficantly different from week 1,2, and 3 (all
Figure 3. Peak oxygen consumption in response to SITFast and SITCHO.
SITCHO: sprint interval training with breakfast prior to training and carbohydrate during exercise;
SITFast: sprint interval training following an overnight fast. V
̇O2peak: peak oxygen consumption
Post-training V
̇O2peak was adjusted for baseline differences.
Figure 4. High-intensity aerobic endurance in response to SITFast and SITCHO.
*significantly different from SITCHO (ANCOVA adjusting for baseline values, p=0.038).
SITCHO: sprint interval training with breakfast prior to training and carbohydrate during exercise;
SITFast: sprint interval training following an overnight fast. T85%: time-to-exhaustion test at 85%
peak oxygen consumption. Post-training T85% was adjusted for baseline differences.
Table 1. Baseline demographic and aerobic characteristics
SITFast, n=11
Mean ± SD
Mean ± SD
Age, years
33.3 ± 7.2
34.0 ± 8.2
Height, cm
180.4 ± 7.9
177.7 ± 6.6
Weight, kg
81.1 ± 13.3
78.9 ± 11.7
BMI, kg/m2
24.8 ± 2.7
25.0 ± 3.1
̇O2peak, L·O2/min
4.3 ± 0.6
4.5 ± 0.4
̇O2peak, mL·O2/kg/min
53.1 ± 7.8
57.3 ± 7.8
VT1, %V
55.5 ± 8.7
58.0 ± 10.8
VT2, %V
78.1 ± 8.6
80.0 ± 7.2
T85%, min
12.6 ± 8.0
17.4 ± 7.5
Table 2. Pre- and post-training substrate oxidation, energy substrate concentration and hormone concentrations before, during and
after time-to-exhaustion at a workload corresponding to 85% of baseline V
̇O2peak (T85%)
SITFast, n=11
Before T85%
During T85%
After T85%
Before T85%
During T85%
After T85%
0.99 ± 0.04
0 .98 ± 0.03
0.99 ± 0.03
0.99 ± 0.04
14 ± 2
14 ± 2
14 ± 1
13 ± 1
Heart rate (bpm)
176 ± 9
171 ± 12
175 ± 7
175 ± 14
Glucose, mmol/L
5.3 ± 0.9
4.1 ± 0.4
4.8 ± 1.0
4.5 ± 0.9
3.9 ± 1.5
5.1 ± 0.9
4.2 ± 0.8*
3.8 ± 0.6
5.1 ± 1.1*
5.1 ± 0.3
3.8 ± 0.7
6.0 ± 1.0
Lactate, mmol/L
1.1 ± 0.5
8.9 ± 2.4
8.8 ± 2.2
1.4 ± 0.5
7.2 ± 3.0
6.9 ± 1.9
1.3 ± 0.5
8.0 ± 2.5
7.8 ± 2.1
1.2 ± 0.5
7.5 ± 2.6
8.7 ± 2.0
NEFA, mmol/L
0.24 ± 0.11
0.12 ± 0.05
0.17 ± 0.12
0.21 ± 0.12
0.11 ± 0.03
0.11 ± 0.03
0.19 ± 0.11
0.13 ± 0.05
0.20 ± 0.10
0.12 ± 0.08
0.10 ± 0.03
0.10 ± 0.03
Insulin, pmol/L
777 ± 1069
612 ± 622
580 ± 324
868 ± 572
438 ± 327
979 ± 1025
698 ± 509
545 ± 686
254 ± 161
763 ± 909
1159 ± 914
391 ± 176
Glucagon, pmol/L
49.3 ± 20.4
32.7 ± 14.2
44.3 ± 20.3
40.7 ± 11.8
44.6 ± 28.9
42.8 ± 14.4
29.5 ± 12.7*
49.7 ± 11.6
46.4 ± 22.9
53.2 ± 25.7
40.9 ± 23.7
41.2 ± 11.7
RER: respiratory exchange ratio; CHO: carbohydrate; RPE: rate of perceived exertion; NEFA: non-esterified fatty acids; SITCHO:
sprint interval training with ample carbohydrate; SITFast: sprint interval training after overnight fast; Before T85%: blood sample was
collected immediately before exercise following 5 minutes of sitting on cycle ergometer without pedaling; During T85%:calorimetry
measures were taken during the 6-9 minute interval and blood sample was collected at minute 10; After T85%: blood sample was
collected immediately after cool-down. Adjusted means are presented for post-training values. *Significantly different from SITCHO
(p<0.05). For circulating substrates and hormones during T85%, n=6 for SITFast and n=8 for SITCHO. For RER and RPE during T85%,
n=9 for SITFast and n=9 for SITCHO.
... A final number of 21 studies satisfied our inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Of these 21 studies,14 are randomized controlled trials [25,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] and 7 are non-randomized trials [24,[44][45][46][47][48][49],with a total of 407 participants who satisfied our inclusion criteria and were included in this review. There are 24 race walkers, 76 cyclist, 21 sprinters, 143 performed resistance training, 12 overload training, 8 runners and 127 participants who did not specify their physical activity. ...
... Cyclists have been shown to improve body composition and an increase in peak power output/bodyweight (PPO/Body weight) when compared to controls after using TRF intervention [39]. Furthermore, cyclists have shown to improve high intensity aerobic endurance using this nutritional strategy [41]. ...
... Physical performance was observed to deteriorate during the first days of the transition period from a usual diet to intermittent fasting in four studies [31,41,44,46]. However, a recovery of performance in the last days of intervention was recognized in two studies [31,41]. ...
Full-text available
Evidence shows that the use of food strategies can impact health, but a clear consensus about how the effects of different food strategies impact improvement in the athlete's performance and health remain unclear. This study evaluated how food strategies, specifically intermittent fasting and a ketogenic diet affect health and performance in healthy athletes. Study selection for this review was based on clinical trial studies analyzing changes in performance and health in athletes. The Pubmed, Web of Science, PEDro, Dialnet, Scopus, CINAHL, ProQuest, Medline and Cochrane databases were searched. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale, PEDro Internal Validity Scale (IVS) and Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a variety of fields (QUALSYT) checklists were used to evaluate the risk of bias of the included studies. Articles were selected based on criteria concerning the effectiveness of nutritional strategies on athletes' performance; articles should be randomized clinical trials (RCTs) or uncontrolled clinical trials; they should be human studies and they should have been published less than 7 years ago. A total of 15 articles were evaluated, 8 randomised clinical trials and 7 non-randomized clinical studies, with 411 participants who satisfied our inclusion criteria and were included in this review. The results of the study showed intermittent fasting and time-restricted feeding as strategies that produce health benefits. On the other hand, the ketogenic diet did not reach an appropriate consensus. The articles presented a medium level of methodological quality in the PEDro scale, low quality in IVS scale and high quality in QUALSYT scale. Despite the lack of studies analyzing changes in the performance and health of athletes after the use of different nutritional strategies, intermittent fasting and time-restricted feeding should be considered since they seem to be effective, and further studies are necessary.
... Of the studies examining the effects of longer-term (>4 weeks) training in the fasted state on endurance adaptations [12][13][14][143][144][145], only one [144] has used endurance-trained subjects. Furthermore, almost all studies using moderate-intensity continuous endurance training in the fasted state also provided the fed groups with CHO during exercise, which can independently influence both acute [120] and chronic [93] responses to exercise. ...
... Of the studies examining the effects of longer-term (>4 weeks) training in the fasted state on endurance adaptations [12][13][14][143][144][145], only one [144] has used endurance-trained subjects. Furthermore, almost all studies using moderate-intensity continuous endurance training in the fasted state also provided the fed groups with CHO during exercise, which can independently influence both acute [120] and chronic [93] responses to exercise. ...
... Question marks represent areas yet to be studied. Created from [12][13][14]31,35,93,[141][142][143][144][145][148][149][150][151][152][153], which included 307 participants (10.7% female), 26.3 ± 4.2 years, VO 2max 53.2 ± 11.0 mL kg −1 min −1 . ...
Full-text available
The primary variables influencing the adaptive response to a bout of endurance training are exercise duration and exercise intensity. However, altering the availability of nutrients before and during exercise can also impact the training response by modulating the exercise stimulus and/or the physiological and molecular responses to the exercise-induced perturbations. The purpose of this review is to highlight the current knowledge of the influence of pre-exercise nutrition ingestion on the metabolic, physiological, and performance responses to endurance training and suggest directions for future research. Acutely, carbohydrate ingestion reduces fat oxidation, but there is little evidence showing enhanced fat burning capacity following long-term fasted-state training. Performance is improved following pre-exercise carbohydrate ingestion for longer but not shorter duration exercise, while training-induced performance improvements following nutrition strategies that modulate carbohydrate availability vary based on the type of nutrition protocol used. Contrasting findings related to the influence of acute carbohydrate ingestion on mitochondrial signaling may be related to the amount of carbohydrate consumed and the intensity of exercise. This review can help to guide athletes, coaches, and nutritionists in personalizing pre-exercise nutrition strategies, and for designing research studies to further elucidate the role of nutrition in endurance training adaptations.
... Overweight or obese women performing interval training for 6 weeks (3 d wk − 1 , 10 × 60-s of cycling bouts, at 90% of HR max ) in the fasted versus fed state showed no significant improvements to peak oxygen uptake (VO 2peak ), body composition and mitochondrial capacity between the fasted and fed groups (Gillen et al., 2013). A study comprising male cyclists completing SIT for 4 weeks (3 d wk − 1 , 4-7 x 30-s incremental sprint bouts) in fasted or fed state demonstrated no significant difference between groups in improvement to VO 2peak , even though exercise time to exhaustion was significantly longer (i.e., better performance) in the fasted group (Terada et al., 2019). However, another cross-over randomised controlled trial with interval training (15 running bouts, 3 min at 40% VO 2peak followed by 1 min at 100% VO 2peak ) performed in the fasted state demonstrated attenuation of interstitial glycaemic parameters in diabetic subjects (Terada et al., 2016). ...
... The lack of significant change in the VO 2peak gains between FAS and FED groups after six weeks of SIT was similar to that observed in another study. Terada et al. showed that gains in VO 2peak achieved in young male cyclists performing 3 sessions per week of 4-7 bouts of 30-s all-out cycling for 4 weeks with overnight fasting (fasting duration not reported) did not differ significantly from those in the non-fasted group (Terada et al., 2019). The authors postulated that acute training quality and/or quantity in the fasted state could be lower relative to the fed state throughout the training period, leading to less-than-optimal training-induced adaptations. ...
Full-text available
Objective Sprint-interval training (SIT) and intermittent fasting are effective independent methods in achieving clinical health outcomes. However, the impact of both modalities when performed concurrently is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of 6 weeks of SIT performed in the fasted versus fed state on physiological and clinical health markers in healthy adults. Methods. Thirty recreationally-active participants were equally randomised into either the fasted (FAS; 4 males, 11 females) or the fed (FED; 6 males, 9 females) group. For all exercise sessions, FAS participants had to fast ≥10 h prior to exercising while FED participants had to consume food within 3 h to exercise. All participants underwent three sessions of SIT per week for 6 weeks. Each session consists of repeated bouts of 30-s Wingate Anaerobic cycle exercise. Pre- and post-training peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), isokinetic leg strength, insulin sensitivity, blood pressure and serum lipid levels were assessed. Results. There were no differences in baseline physiological and clinical measures between both groups (all p > 0.05). VO2peak improved by 6.0 ± 8.8% in the FAS group and 5.3 ± 10.6% in the FED group (both p < 0.05), however the difference in improvement between groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). A similar pattern of results was seen for knee flexion maximum voluntary contraction at 300°·s⁻¹. SIT training in either fasted or fed state had no impact on insulin sensitivity (both p > 0.05). There was significant reduction in diastolic blood pressure (8.2 ± 4.2%) and mean arterial pressure (7.0 ± 3.2%) in the FAS group (both p < 0.05) but not FED group (both p > 0.05). Conclusion. VO2peak and leg strength improved with SIT regardless of whether participants trained in the fasted or fed state. Chronic SIT in the fasted state may potentially reduce blood pressure to a greater extent than the same chronic SIT in the fed state.
... From a performance standpoint, fed-state exercise generally enhances prolonged (>60 min), but not shorter duration (<60 min) aerobic exercise compared with exercising in the fasted state [12], although few studies have used a high-intensity interval training (HIIT) model to measure performance despite HIIT being performed by virtually all endurance athletes [13]. Total work performed during HIIT has been reported to be increased in the fed, compared with the fasted state during some [14,15] but not all [16] studies. To our knowledge, no studies have compared pre-exercise CHO, protein, and fasted-state training on HIIT work capacity. ...
Full-text available
Nutritional intake can influence exercise metabolism and performance, but there is a lack of research comparing protein-rich pre-exercise meals with endurance exercise performed both in the fasted state and following a carbohydrate-rich breakfast. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of three pre-exercise nutrition strategies on metabolism and exercise capacity during cycling. On three occasions, seventeen trained male cyclists (VO2peak 62.2 ± 5.8 mL·kg−1·min−1, 31.2 ± 12.4 years, 74.8 ± 9.6 kg) performed twenty minutes of submaximal cycling (4 × 5 min stages at 60%, 80%, and 100% of ventilatory threshold (VT), and 20% of the difference between power at the VT and peak power), followed by 3 × 3 min intervals at 80% peak aerobic power and 3 × 3 min intervals at maximal effort, 30 min after consuming a carbohydrate-rich meal (CARB; 1 g/kg CHO), a protein-rich meal (PROTEIN; 0.45 g/kg protein + 0.24 g/kg fat), or water (FASTED), in a randomized and counter-balanced order. Fat oxidation was lower for CARB compared with FASTED at and below the VT, and compared with PROTEIN at 60% VT. There were no differences between trials for average power during high-intensity intervals (367 ± 51 W, p = 0.516). Oxidative stress (F2-Isoprostanes), perceived exertion, and hunger were not different between trials. Overall, exercising in the overnight- fasted state increased fat oxidation during submaximal exercise compared with exercise following a CHO-rich breakfast, and pre-exercise protein ingestion allowed similarly high levels of fat oxidation. There were no differences in perceived exertion, hunger, or performance, and we provide novel data showing no influence of pre-exercise nutrition ingestion on exercise-induced oxidative stress.
... Na condição de alimentado, o desempenho aeróbio é prolongado, enquanto que, em jejum, algumas adaptações metabólicas são induzidas aos tecidos periféricos, mas que necessitam de mais investigações (Aird et al., 2018). Nesse mesmo sentido, Terada et al.,(2019) relataram que a prática de exercícios aeróbios de alta intensidade em jejum compromete a manutenção da intensidade e do volume durante o exercício, porém, favorece a capacidade de sustentar exercícios de resistência aeróbia de alta intensidade em comparação com aqueles sujeitos alimentados. Contudo, quando são observados atletas que realizam a prática do jejum por questões religiosas, o desempenho é reduzido ou mantido, sem evidencias de melhora (Levy y Chu, 2019). ...
Full-text available
Os objetivos do estudo foram investigar as prevalências da prescriçãoe interpretação profissional e da prática de exercício aeróbio em jejum por alunos praticantes de musculação, bem como, comparar o conhecimento de professores e alunos sobre os potenciais benefícios e riscos desta. Na comparação empregou-se o teste exato de Fischer. Participaram do estudo 110 alunos e 8 professores. Não houve relato de prescrição, enquanto a prática atual de exercício aeróbio em jejum foi de 16,4%. O principal objetivo relatado para a prática foi o emagrecimento. Nos benefícios, os professores relataram em maior proporção que o aeróbio em jejum pode promover melhoria da saúde, mas também reconheceram que a prática pode trazer malefícios à saúde. A divergência entre prevalência de prescrição profissional e prática do exercício aeróbio em jejum sinalizam um provável desconhecimento dos professores acerca da forma como os exercícios aeróbios estão sendo praticados por alunos em academias de musculação. Ademais, o conhecimento dos professores sobre os potenciais riscos dessa prática precisa alcançar seus alunos, objetivando informá-los da possibilidade de eventos indesejáveis à saúde.
Full-text available
Hall, AJ, Aspe, RR, Craig, TP, Kavaliauskas, M, Babraj, J, and Swinton, PA. The effects of sprint interval training on physical performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000–000, 2022—The present study aimed to synthesize findings from published research and through meta-analysis quantify the effect of sprint interval training (SIT) and potential moderators on physical performance outcomes (categorized as aerobic, anaerobic, mixed aerobic-anaerobic, or muscular force) with healthy adults, in addition to assessing the methodological quality of included studies and the existence of small study effects. Fifty-five studies were included (50% moderate methodological quality, 42% low methodological quality), with 58% comprising an intervention duration of ≤4 weeks and an array of different training protocols. Bayesian’s meta-analysis of standardized mean differences (SMD) identified a medium effect of improved physical performance with SIT (ES0.5 = 0.52; 95% credible intervals [CrI]: 0.42–0.62). Moderator analyses identified overlap between outcome types with the largest effects estimated for anaerobic outcomes (ES0.5 = 0.61; 95% CrI: 0.48–0.75). Moderator effects were identified for intervention duration, sprint length, and number of sprints performed per session, with larger effects obtained for greater values of each moderator. A substantive number of very large effect sizes (41 SMDs > 2) were identified with additional evidence of extensive small study effects. This meta-analysis demonstrates that short-term SIT interventions are effective for developing moderate improvements in physical performance outcomes. However, extensive small study effects, likely influenced by researchers analyzing many outcomes, suggest potential overestimation of reported effects. Future research should analyze fewer a priori selected outcomes and investigate models to progress SIT interventions for longer-term performance improvements.
The scientific community currently expresses a high level of interest in intermittent fasting - periods of voluntary abstinence from energy intake, ranging from several hours to days. Intermittent fasting is clinically relevant and may represent an effective non- pharmacological strategy to improve physical performance and body composition. It has been studied mainly in athletes during the religious period of Ramadan and in people predisposed to decrease body fat without loss of fat-free mass parallel. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the impact of intermittent fasting during Ramadan vs. non-Ramadan intermittent fasting in terms of physical performance and body composition. The literature shows some inconsistencies in terms of the interaction between intermittent fasting and physical performance. However, non-Ramadan intermittent fasting is found to be effective in improving maximal aerobic power. Nevertheless, this intervention reduces performance during the repeated sprints over the first few days of intervention. On the other hand, intermittent fasting during Ramadan being the maximum aerobic power and this is more expressive during the second half of this religious period. However, both interventions are manifestly innocuous in terms of muscle strength and anaerobic capacity. With regard to body composition, there is greater consensus. According to available data, both interventions encourage beneficial adaptations at this level. Still, fat loss is more pronounced with intermittent non-Ramadan fasting.
Exercise and physical activity are important tools in the management of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes due, in part, to their ability to decrease risk factors associated with diabetes-related complications and improve overall health. Like any other treatment, however, a great deal of interindividual and intraindividual variation exists in responses to different activity doses (type, timing, intensity, frequency, and duration). This chapter provides an overview of the factors that may influence both short- and long-term adaptation to exercise and physical activity in individuals with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes so that the right treatment, for the right person, at the right time can be combined in developing an appropriate exercise/physical activity prescription.KeywordsAerobic exerciseResistance exerciseHigh-intensity intermittent exerciseBlood glucoseInsulinA1c
Objetivo: Describir el comportamiento de la glucosa y la insulina durante las etapas del ejercicio en atletas acondicionados en ejercicio aeróbico y anaeróbico. Materiales y Métodos: En un estudio Cuasi-experimental de corte transversal se compararon la glucosa e insulina de 6 atletas anaeróbicos y 10 aeróbicos durante el reposo, ejercicio de moderada- alta intensidad y la recuperación. Se eligio un valor p de <0.05, distribución no-normal fue encontrada, y se utilizaron pruebas no paramétricas, y modelos de regresión linear. Resultados: El ejercicio moderado llevó a hipoinsulinemia, y el intenso a hiperinsulinemia e hiperglicemia. No encontramos diferencias entre los dos tipos de atletas. Conclusiones: El comportamiento del sistema nervioso autónomo afectaría el balance glucoenergético corporal durante el ejercicio aún más que la insulina, con variaciones dependiendo del tipo de entrenamiento, pero es necesario realizar estudios adicionales para evaluar esta relación.
Athletes may choose to perform exercise in the overnight-fasted state for a variety of reasons related to convenience, gut comfort, or augmenting the training response, but it is unclear how many endurance athletes use this strategy. We investigated the prevalence and determinants of exercise performed in the overnight-fasted state among endurance athletes using an online survey and examined differences based on sex, competitive level, and habitual dietary pattern. The survey was completed by 1,950 endurance athletes (51.0% female, mean age 40.9 ± 11.1 years). The use of fasted training was reported by 62.9% of athletes, with significant effects of sex ( p < .001, Cramer’s V [φ c ] = 0.18, 90% CI [0.14, 0.22]), competitive level ( p < .001, φ c = 0.09, 90% CI [0.5, 0.13]), and habitual dietary pattern noted ( p < .001, φ c = 0.26, 90% CI [0.22, 0.29]). Males, nonprofessional athletes, and athletes following a low-carbohydrate, high-fat diet were most likely to perform fasted training. The most common reasons for doing so were related to utilizing fat as a fuel source (42.9%), gut comfort (35.5%), and time constraints/convenience (31.4%), whereas the most common reasons athletes avoided fasted training were that it does not help their training (47.0%), performance was worse during fasted training (34.7%), or greater hunger (34.6%). Overall, some athletes perform fasted training because they think it helps their training, whereas others avoid it because they think it is detrimental to their training goals, highlighting a need for future research. These findings offer insights into the beliefs and practices related to fasted-state endurance training.
Full-text available
Purpose: We investigated the effect of a chronic dietary periodization strategy on endurance performance in trained athletes. Methods: 21 triathletes (V[Combining Dot Above]O2max: 58.7 ± 5.7 mL·min·kg) were divided into 2 groups: a "sleep-low" (SL, n = 11) and a control group (CON, n = 10) consumed the same daily carbohydrate (CHO) intake (6 g·kg·d) but with different timing over the day to manipulate CHO availability before and after training sessions. The "sleep low" strategy consisted of a 3-week training/diet intervention comprising three blocks of diet/exercise manipulations: 1) "train-high" interval training sessions (HIT) in the evening with high-CHO availability; 2) overnight CHO restriction ("sleeping-low"), and 3) "train-low" sessions with low endogenous and exogenous CHO availability. The CON group followed the same training program but with high CHO availability throughout training sessions (no CHO restriction overnight, training sessions with exogenous CHO provision). Results: There was a significant improvement in delta efficiency during submaximal cycling for SL versus CON (CON: +1.4 ± 9.3 %, SL: +11 ± 15 %, P<0.05). SL also improved supra-maximal cycling to exhaustion at 150% of peak aerobic power (CON: +1.63 ± 12.4 %, SL: +12.5 ± 19.0 %; P = 0.06) and 10 km running performance (CON: -0.10 ± 2.03 %, SL: -2.9 ± 2.15 %; P < 0.05). Fat mass was decreased in SL (CON: -2.6 ± 7.4; SL: -8.5 ± 7.4 %PRE, P < 0.01), but not lean mass (CON: -0.22 ± 1.0; SL: -0.16 ± 1.7 %PRE). Conclusion: Short-term periodization of dietary CHO availability around selected training sessions promoted significant improvements in submaximal cycling economy, as well as supra-maximal cycling capacity and 10 km running time in trained endurance athletes.
Full-text available
Abstract Traditional nutritional approaches to endurance training have typically promoted high carbohydrate (CHO) availability before, during and after training sessions to ensure adequate muscle substrate to meet the demands of high daily training intensities and volumes. However, during the past decade, data from our laboratories and others have demonstrated that deliberately training in conditions of reduced CHO availability can promote training-induced adaptations of human skeletal muscle (i.e. increased maximal mitochondrial enzyme activities and/or mitochondrial content, increased rates of lipid oxidation and, in some instances, improved exercise capacity). Such data have led to the concept of 'training low, but competing high' whereby selected training sessions are completed in conditions of reduced CHO availability (so as to promote training adaptation), but CHO reserves are restored immediately prior to an important competition. The augmented training response observed with training-low strategies is likely regulated by enhanced activation of key cell signalling kinases (e.g. AMPK, p38MAPK), transcription factors (e.g. p53, PPARδ) and transcriptional co-activators (e.g. PGC-1α), such that a co-ordinated up-regulation of both the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes occurs. Although the optimal practical strategies to train low are not currently known, consuming additional caffeine, protein, and practising CHO mouth-rinsing before and/or during training may help to rescue the reduced training intensities that typically occur when 'training low', in addition to preventing protein breakdown and maintaining optimal immune function. Finally, athletes should practise 'train-low' workouts in conjunction with sessions undertaken with normal or high CHO availability so that their capacity to oxidise CHO is not blunted on race day.
Full-text available
This study compared different relative load factors for eliciting the highest peak 5 s and mean 30 s absolute power output (watts) during an arm crank 30 s Wingate anaerobic power test in 40 upper body trained and recreationally active men and women. The relative load factor of 0.075 kg · kg(- 1) BM elicited a higher peak 5 s power output than 0.070 and 0.080 kg · kg(- 1) for trained males, and 0.070 was higher than 0.055 and 0.080 kg · kg(- 1) for active males (P<0.05). In trained women, the peak 5 s power output was greatest at 0.065 kg · kg(- 1) and 0.060 kg · kg(- 1) for active women. Mean 30 s power output at a relative load factor of 0.060, 0.065 and 0.070 kg · kg(- 1) was higher than 0.080, 0.085 and 0.090 kg · kg(- 1) in trained men, and mean power output at 0.080 kg · kg(- 1) was lower than all other relative load factors in active men (P<0.05). Mean 30 s power was greatest at 0.050 kg · kg(- 1) for trained and active women. In conclusion, the optimal relative load factor was different for eliciting peak 5 s and mean 30 s power outputs during an arm crank Wingate anaerobic test and depends on training status and gender.
Full-text available
Mitochondrial biogenesis is a critical metabolic adaptation to aerobic exercise training that results in enhanced mitochondrial size, content, number, and activity. Recent evidence has shown that dietary manipulation can further enhance mitochondrial adaptations to aerobic exercise training, which may delay skeletal muscle fatigue and enhance exercise performance. Specifically, studies have demonstrated that combining carbohydrate restriction (endogenous and exogenous) with a single bout of aerobic exercise potentiates the beneficial effects of exercise on markers of mitochondrial biogenesis. Additionally, studies have demonstrated that high-quality protein supplementation enhances anabolic skeletal muscle intracellular signaling and mitochondrial protein synthesis following a single bout of aerobic exercise. Mitochondrial biogenesis is stimulated by complex intracellular signaling pathways that appear to be primarily regulated by 5'AMP-activated protein kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase mediated through proliferator-activated γ receptor co-activator 1 α activation, resulting in increased mitochondrial DNA expression and enhanced skeletal muscle oxidative capacity. However, the mechanisms by which concomitant carbohydrate restriction and dietary protein supplementation modulates mitochondrial adaptations to aerobic exercise training remains unclear. This review summarizes intracellular regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis and the effects of carbohydrate restriction and protein supplementation on mitochondrial adaptations to aerobic exercise.
The accelerated metabolic demands of the working muscle cannot be met without a robust response from the liver. If not for the hepatic response, sustained exercise would be impossible. The liver stores, releases, and recycles potential energy. Exercise would result in hypoglycemia if it were not for the accelerated release of energy as glucose. The energetic demands on the liver are largely met by increased oxidation of fatty acids mobilized from adipose tissue. Adaptations immediately following exercise facilitate the replenishment of glycogen stores. Pancreatic glucagon and insulin responses orchestrate the hepatic response during and immediately following exercise. Like skeletal muscle and other physiological systems, liver adapts to repeated demands of exercise by increasing its capacity to produce energy by oxidizing fat. The ability of regular physical activity to increase fat oxidation is protective and can reverse fatty liver disease. Engaging in regular physical exercise has broad ranging positive health implications including those that improve the metabolic health of the liver.
The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a 4-week running sprint interval training protocol to improve both aerobic and anaerobic fitness in middle-aged adults (40-50 years) as well as compare the adaptations to younger adults (20-30 years). Twenty-eight inactive participants - 14 young 20-30-year-olds (n = 7 males) and 14 middle-aged 40-50-year-olds (n = 5 males) - completed 4 weeks of running sprint interval training (4 to 6, 30-s "all-out" sprints on a curved, self-propelled treadmill separated by 4 min active recovery performed 3 times per week). Before and after training, all participants were assessed for maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max), 2000 m time trial performance, and anaerobic performance on a single 30-s sprint. There were no interactions between group and time for any tested variable, although training improved relative VO2max (young = 3.9, middle-aged = 5.2%; P < 0.04), time trial performance (young = 5.9, middle-aged = 8.2%; P < 0.001), peak sprint speed (young = 9.3, middle-aged = 2.2%; P < 0.001), and average sprint speed (young = 6.8, middle-aged = 11.6%; P < 0.001) in both young and middle-aged groups from pre- to post-training on the 30-s sprint test. The current study demonstrates that a 4-week running sprint interval training programme is equally effective at improving aerobic and anaerobic fitness in younger and middle-aged adults.
Commencing some training sessions with reduced carbohydrate (CHO) availability has been shown to enhance skeletal muscle adaptations, but the effect on exercise performance is less clear. We examined whether restricting CHO intake between twice daily sessions of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) augments improvements in exercise performance and mitochondrial content. Eighteen active but not highly trained subjects [peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) = 44 ± 9 ml/kg/min], matched for age, sex, and fitness, were randomly allocated to two groups. On each of six days over 2 wk, subjects completed two training sessions, each consisting of 5 x 4-min cycling intervals (60% of peak power), interspersed by 2 min of recovery. Subjects ingested either 195 g of CHO ("HI-HI" group: ~2.3 g/kg) or 17 g of CHO ("HI-LO" group: ~0.3 g/kg) during the 3-h period between sessions. The training-induced improvement in 250-kJ time trial performance was greater (p = 0.02) in the HI-LO group (211 ± 66 W to 244 ± 75 W) compared to the HI-HI group (203 ± 53 W to 219 ± 60 W); however, the increases in mitochondrial content was similar between groups, as reflected by similar increases in citrate synthase maximal activity, citrate synthase protein content and cytochrome c oxidase subunit IV protein content (p > 0.05 for interaction terms). This is the first study to show that a short-term 'train low, compete high' intervention can improve whole-body exercise capacity. Further research is needed to determine whether this type of manipulation can also enhance performance in highly-trained subjects.
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of time-efficient, low-volume, interval exercises on cardiorespiratory capacity and left ventricular (LV) mass with traditional continuous exercise in sedentary adults. Forty-two healthy but sedentary male subjects (aged 26.5 ± 6.2 years) participated in an 8-week, 5 times/week, supervised exercise intervention. They were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 exercise protocols: sprint interval training (SIT, 5 min, 100 kcal); high-intensity interval aerobic training (HIAT, 13 min, 180 kcal); and continuous aerobic training (CAT, 40 min, 360 kcal). Cardiorespiratory capacity (VO2max) and LV mass (3T-MRI) were measured pre- and post-intervention. We observed significant (P < 0.01) increases in VO2max in all three groups, while the effect of the HIAT was the greatest of the three (SIT, 16.7 ± 11.6%; HIAT, 22.5 ± 12.2%; CAT, 10.0 ± 8.9%, P = 0.01). There were significant changes in LV mass, stroke volume (SV) and resting heart rate (HR) in both the SIT (LV mass, 6.5 ± 8.3%; SV, 5.3 ± 8.3%; HR, -7.3 ± 11.1%, all P < 0.05) and HIAT (LV mass, 8.0 ± 8.3%; SV, 12.1 ± 9.8%; HR, -12.7 ± 12.2%, all P < 0.01) but not in the CAT (LV mass, 2.5 ± 10.1%; SV, 3.6 ± 6.6%; HR, -2.2 ± 13.3%, all P > 0.05). Our study revealed that VO2max improvement with the HIAT was greater than with the CAT despite the HIAT being performed with a far lower volume and in far less time than the CAT. This suggests that the HIAT has potential as a time-efficient training mode to improve VO2max in sedentary adults.