ArticlePDF Available

Development and On-Field Testing of Low-Cost Portable System for Monitoring PM2.5 Concentrations


Abstract and Figures

Recent developments in the field of low-cost sensors enable the design and implementation of compact, inexpensive and portable sensing units for air pollution monitoring with fine-detailed spatial and temporal resolution, in order to support applications of wider interest in the area of intelligent transportation systems (ITS). In this context, the present work advances the concept of developing a low-cost portable air pollution monitoring system (APMS) for measuring the concentrations of particulate matter (PM), in particular fine particles with a diameter of 2.5 μm or less (PM2.5). Specifically, this paper presents the on-field testing of the proposed low-cost APMS implementation using roadside measurements from a mobile laboratory equipped with a calibrated instrument as the basis of comparison and showcases its accuracy on characterizing the PM2.5 concentrations on 1 min resolution in an on-road trial. Moreover, it demonstrates the intended application of collecting fine-grained spatio-temporal PM2.5 profiles by mounting the developed APMS on an electric bike as a case study in the city of Mons, Belgium.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Development and On-Field Testing of Low-Cost
Portable System for Monitoring
PM2.5 Concentrations
Konstantinos N. Genikomsakis 1ID , Nikolaos-Fivos Galatoulas 1, Panagiotis I. Dallas 2,
Luis Miguel Candanedo Ibarra 1, Dimitris Margaritis 3and Christos S. Ioakimidis 1, *
1European Research Area Chair (*Holder) ‘Net-Zero Energy Efficiency on City Districts, NZED’ Unit,
Research Institute for Energy, University of Mons, Rue de l’Epargne, 56, 7000 Mons, Belgium; (K.N.G.); (N.-F.G.); (L.M.C.I.)
2Wireless Network Systems Division, INTRACOM Telecom S.A., 19.7 km Markopoulo Ave., Peania,
19002 Athens, Greece;
3Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), Hellenic Institute of Transport (HIT),
6th km Charilaou-Thermi, 57001 Thermi, Thessaloniki, Greece;
*Correspondence:; Tel.: +32-(0)65-374-462
Received: 28 February 2018; Accepted: 31 March 2018; Published: 1 April 2018
Recent developments in the field of low-cost sensors enable the design and implementation
of compact, inexpensive and portable sensing units for air pollution monitoring with fine-detailed
spatial and temporal resolution, in order to support applications of wider interest in the area of
intelligent transportation systems (ITS). In this context, the present work advances the concept
of developing a low-cost portable air pollution monitoring system (APMS) for measuring the
concentrations of particulate matter (PM), in particular fine particles with a diameter of 2.5
or less (PM2.5). Specifically, this paper presents the on-field testing of the proposed low-cost APMS
implementation using roadside measurements from a mobile laboratory equipped with a calibrated
instrument as the basis of comparison and showcases its accuracy on characterizing the PM2.5
concentrations on 1 min resolution in an on-road trial. Moreover, it demonstrates the intended
application of collecting fine-grained spatio-temporal PM2.5 profiles by mounting the developed
APMS on an electric bike as a case study in the city of Mons, Belgium.
air pollution; calibration; environmental monitoring; mobile applications; particulate
matter; sensor systems; system testing
1. Introduction
Road transportation is known to be a major source of air pollution with particularly adverse
effects on the natural environment and quality of human life, calling for drastic actions to reduce the
levels of harmful gases and particulate matter (PM), mainly in urban areas. Over the years, there
have been significant efforts to develop a variety of applications relevant to intelligent transportation
systems (ITS), not only for improving traffic flow or reducing emissions and energy consumption from
transportation related activities [
] but also for monitoring air pollution [
]. Existing solutions for air
pollution monitoring include networks of static measurement stations, characterized by high accuracy
and reliability as well as ability to measure a wide range of air pollutants. However, the installation of
these systems faces severe limitations due to high acquisition and maintenance costs [
]. From the
portability point of view, vehicles equipped with on-board costly measurement devices can be used as
mobile laboratories for air pollution monitoring with high spatial and temporal resolution [4].
Sensors 2018,18, 1056; doi:10.3390/s18041056
Sensors 2018,18, 1056 2 of 16
It becomes clear that there is a challenging field of research with respect to the development of
cost-effective portable devices that can be mounted on vehicles in order to support applications of
wider interest in the area of ITS, for instance, portable sensing units on public transportation vehicles
for real-time display of pollutants levels [
] and generation of high-resolution urban air pollution
maps [
], on conventional bikes for mobile air quality monitoring [
] or on electric bikes for capturing
fine-grained environmental information and planning healthier routes [
]. Combining the available
information and communications technologies (ICT) with the recent developments in the market
of low-cost sensors enables not only the design and implementation of compact, inexpensive and
portable sensing units for creating profiles of aerosol concentrations with fine-detailed spatial and
temporal resolution but also the deployment of networks of such devices as mobile agents operating
concurrently under a big data analysis scheme in order to develop applications and provide add-on
services in the context of ITS. The authors in [
] emphasize on the need to quantify the performance
of these low-cost sensors under real-world conditions. To that end, field experiments are employed
in [
] to examine the consistency, stability and durability of the sensing units, using hourly data for
PM concentrations.
In this context, the focus of the present work is on low-cost sensors for implementing a portable
unit to measure the concentration of PMs, in particular fine particles with a diameter of 2.5
m or less
(PM2.5), the exposure to which is known to cause acute and chronic effects on human health, including
premature mortality due to cardiopulmonary diseases and lung cancer [
]. Specifically, this paper
introduces the key components of a portable air pollution monitoring system (APMS) based on low-cost
sensors, describes the on-field testing of the proposed sensing unit using roadside measurements from
a mobile laboratory equipped with a calibrated instrument as the basis of comparison and showcases
its accuracy on characterizing the PM2.5 concentrations on 1 min resolution in an on-road experiment.
Moreover, it presents a case study to demonstrate the intended application by mounting the proposed
low-cost APMS on an electric bike (e-bike) in order to collect data of PM2.5 concentrations in the
city of Mons, Belgium and compare them with the hourly measurements available from the local
monitoring station. At this point, it is noted that the purpose of this work is neither to detect the
source of the pollutants nor to chemically characterize them but rather to propose a low-cost mobile
measurement system to map ambient PM concentration levels stemming from diverse activities in
urban environments.
Specifically, this work examines the potential of a portable APMS with integrated low-cost sensor
technologies to perform reliable measurements of PM2.5 concentrations in the ambient air after on-field
calibration with a certified optical particle counter instrument. Mobile monitoring of air pollution with
an electric vehicle is demonstrated for determining and comparing emission factors from vehicles
under various conditions in [
], assessing on road near-source air quality gradients in [
] and
characterizing exposure zones in [
]. Taking into account the above, the main contributions of this
work include the following: (i) the implementation of APMS is based on a PM sensor that has not
been reported in the literature before; (ii) roadside and on-road measurements were carried out to
experimentally test and validate the proposed APMS using a mobile air pollution laboratory housed
in a van as a calibrated comparison system; (iii) regression models were derived from post-processing
of the sensor readings in order to assess ambient PM2.5 concentrations in a geo-referenced mobile test;
and (iv) an e-bike was employed as a case study to demonstrate the intended application, along with
the capability of collecting fine-grained spatio-temporal contamination profiles, in sharp contrast to
the hourly averages of PM2.5 concentrations from fixed monitoring stations.
The rest of the paper is structured as follows: Section 2provides an overview of the relevant
work in the fields of mobile air pollution monitoring and roadside measurements. Section 3presents
the key components of the proposed low-cost APMS and the mobile laboratory, as well as describes
the experimental campaign. Section 4focuses on the calibration of the APMS based on stationary
measurements, while Section 5assesses the validity of the developed models under a mobile run test.
Sensors 2018,18, 1056 3 of 16
Section 6discusses the results obtained in an urban case study, where the APMS was mounted on an
e-bike. Last, Section 7draws the main conclusions of the paper.
2. Related Work
In recent years, there has been growing research interest in developing low-cost portable APMSs
that can provide fine-grained data related to traffic induced emissions in urban areas, employing
the latest advancements in big data analysis and sensor node infrastructures communicating with
wireless sensor network (WSN) technology [
]. In an attempt to introduce inexpensive air mapping
solutions, mobile measurement systems are designed to function in an interoperable multi-vehicular
way and tested in applications ranging from pedestrian wearables, bicycles, public transportation,
to automobiles [
]. On-road trials with experimental instrumentation have produced benchmark
results on the real-time emissions footprint of vehicles [
]. Until now similar methodologies have been
applied for a variety of objectives, such as assessment of personal exposure by providing equipment
to the study object [
], mapping spatial variation in air pollution [
], or to develop and validate air
quality models [
]. Other studies address the potential of using mobile measurements to construct
air pollution maps at a high spatial resolution [
]. Mobile monitoring techniques also receive an
increasing attention for participatory sensing and crowdsourcing methods [
], hence setting the
field for urban citizen science to investigate the correlation between air quality and public health.
In this context, community-based sensing projects proposed novel low-cost APMS instrument for
large-scale and mobile deployment [25].
Roadside measurements provide the instantaneous ratios of pollutant concentrations from
vehicles passing by the roadway where the station is installed. Mobile-sensing enables monitoring of
emissions linked to a large number of vehicles with a tuneable spatio-temporal resolution to match
emission levels with specific vehicles [
]. Currently, this sensing approximation provides a roughly
estimated value of PM concentrations, mainly sourcing from fuel combustion, exhausts, tires and
secondary particles formed in the atmosphere at a specific location under specific operating conditions
and it relies on the evolution of the current inexpensive sensing components in order to produce
more trustworthy quantitative models of heavy traffic [
]. Thus, it is a challenging task to develop
emission factor models that better capture the PM footprint from various sources, depending solely on
inexpensive mobile-sensing instruments. Furthermore, designing mobile-sensing systems needs to
carefully deal with unstable weather and background pollution levels that hinder the evaluation of the
actual vehicle emissions. In particular, the performance of three inexpensive sensing devices when
measuring engine exhaust PM emissions are evaluated in [28].
3. Description of Low-Cost APMS and Experimental Setting
This section describes in detail the key components of the proposed APMS implementation
using low-cost sensors and provides an overview of the mobile laboratory that was employed as a
comparison measurement system for the on-field evaluation.
3.1. Design Specifications of Low-Cost APMS
The proposed low-cost APMS implementation is aimed to function as a portable, compact and
adjustable data collecting solution. It consists of a single board microcontroller equipped with a
data-logging extension, a GPS module and an off-the-shelf optical PM sensor, namely Laser PM2.5
Sensor SDS011 by Nova Fitness [
] shown in Figure 1a. The sensor is designed with a built-in fan
to ensure sample air circulation to a chamber with a laser diode, where the size and amount of PM
is determined. The scattered light is transformed into electrical signals and with further analysis on
the signal waveform the digital output of the component is the particle concentration of PM2.5 and
PM10 (from counts of particles with diameters from 0.3 to 10
m). The working principle is based on
light scattering, where a light source illuminates the particles and the scattered light is transformed
into a signal by a photodetector, the amplitude of which depends on the light wavelength, scattering
Sensors 2018,18, 1056 4 of 16
angle, particle size and relative index of refraction between medium and particle. The sensor under
study uses sampling with 0–5 V pulses of 1004 ms in length, allowing measurement intervals of
roughly 1 s. In detail, a laser diode generates a single frequency beam, with typical wavelength in
similar components ranging from 870 to 980 nm (infrared spectrum) as reported in [
]. In contrast to
the other commercially available low-cost PM sensors described in [
] that use thermal resistors to
generate heat and thus employ natural convection for introducing the particles in the light scattering
region, the apparatus under study achieves that with an embedded fan that generates a negative
pressure in order to conduct the particle flow through the specified path (Figure 2). The SDS011 sensor
measures PM2.5 and PM10 within the range 0.0 to 999.9
and it has a maximum relative error
15% at 25
C and 50% relative humidity, according to the manufacturer. At this point, it is noted
that the specific sensor yielded some errors in the measurements (PM2.5 concentration = 999.9
taken in the frame of this work, thus these outlier readings were filtered-out from the time series
presented in the next sections of the paper.
Figure 1.
Low-cost sensors: (
) SDS011 for measuring concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10; (
) DHT22
for measuring temperature and relative humidity.
Figure 2.
Layout of SDS011 sensor for measuring particulate matter (PM) concentrations. Particles flow
through the sampling inlet and enter the sensing chamber, where the incident laser beam is scattered
depending on their size. A low noise amplifier operates as a transducer, by transforming the collected
light to various signal intensities.
Thereafter, the microcontroller was programmed to record the timestamped reading of the PM
sensor. The data logger of the low-cost APMS records measurements from the on-board sensors every
4 s. The logger has a real-time clock that is used to add a timestamp to each measurement and saves the
information in an individual comma-separated values (csv) file each day. Auxiliary sensor components
for temperature and relative humidity were added to the system in order to examine the effects of
ambient weather conditions on the overall performance and thereby to exclude any possible alterations
on the quality of the collected data. For the purposes of this work, the DHT22 sensor was chosen to
measure temperature and relative humidity (Figure 1b), given that it is a manufacturer-calibrated
Sensors 2018,18, 1056 5 of 16
digital sensor that offers an accuracy of
C for temperature and
2% (maximum
5%) for
relative humidity.
The final assembly along with a powering circuit enabling it to power from a range of storage
options was cased in a polypropylene box with dimensions 27
7 cm and weight 150 g. In cost
terms, the electronic parts were acquired from online retailers, with a total material cost rising up to
. However, it is important to note that an even more cost-effective variant, which assigns the
power and data logging to a portable computer, could be constructed for less than 80 .
3.2. Comparison Measurement System
Field experiments for tuning and calibrating the described prototype were carried out in
collaboration with the Hellenic Institute of Transportation (HIT) at the Centre for Research Technology
(CERTH) in Thermi-Thessaloniki, Greece. The provided comparison system was the Mobile Lab for
Environmental and Traffic Measurements (Figure 3) equipped with a certified PM concentration
analyser. The Mobile Lab carries automatic gas emissions analysts, series AP-370 by HORIBA,
suitable for the constant air pollution measurement, which are certified according to international
standards organizations, that is, US EPA and TUV. They are state-of-the-art technology, controlled by
an embedded processor, have an embedded sample pump and keyboard, provide instant values on a
digital screen, full diagnostics both on screen and on RS232 port and interact with the proper systems
for the sampling, calibration, data recording-processing and communication with the central station.
A portable high quality PM2.5 sensor, namely the Optical Particle Sizer (TSI OPS 3330), was used
to compare the measurements from the SDS011 sensor. The former is based on an optical principle
of operation with 120
light collection and electronics processing resulting in precise, high quality
data. It can detect particles in the size range of 0.3–10
m in up to 16 channels and on a concentration
range from 0 to 3000 particles/cm
. A built-in pump in this instrument fixes the flow rate (sample and
sheath) to 1 L/min. At this point, it is important to note that, according to the instrument’s certificate
of calibration and testing, it has been calibrated using standards whose accuracies are traceable to
the United States National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) or has been verified with
respect to instrumentation whose accuracy is traceable to NIST. Moreover, data for both temperature
and humidity parameters were available from the stationed Mobile Lab. The data-sampling rate of TSI
OPS 3330 was initially set to 1 sample reading per min for collecting stationary measurements and
was later raised to 1 sample reading per 10 s for collecting measurements en route. The data collected
from the loggers of the two different devices (i.e., of TSI 3330 OPS and proposed low-cost APMS) were
averaged by 1 min to establish a common time basis for comparison purposes.
Figure 3.
Mobile Lab for Environmental and Traffic Measurements of Centre for Research Technology
(CERTH)/Hellenic Institute of Transportation (HIT), equipped with a portable air pollution sensor rack
for collecting and analysing environmental pollution and traffic related data.
Sensors 2018,18, 1056 6 of 16
3.3. Experimental Campaign
The experimental campaign took place from 6–8 March 2017 in the city of Thessaloniki, Greece,
with the aim to monitor PM emissions, in particular PM2.5, from urban traffic with the Mobile Lab
for Environmental and Traffic Measurements used as a comparison system. First, a set of roadside
measurements was collected in the area of CERTH premises, close to an intersection with high
vehicle-traffic and in the vicinity of agricultural facilities. The objective of this field test was to assess
the operability of the proposed low-cost APMS implementation under real-world conditions and
calibrate its sensors based on data concurrently measured from the specialized high quality optical
particle sizing instrument TSI OPS 3330. The duration of the stationary experiment was 3 days and the
collected data were stored in a microSD card on the prototype for post-processing.
Next, a mobile run test was performed in order to evaluate the accuracy of individual sensors
and the performance of the system as a whole in an urban rush-hour emissions measurement scenario.
A route with variations in traffic density was designed with the aim to test the PM2.5 sensing validity in
areas with previously recorded high level of air contamination concerning these particle size categories
(based on past measurements of central stations). The system was mounted on the Mobile Lab rooftop
and stabilized at 2.6 m above ground level. The comparison system received sampling air from
approximately the same level with the proposed APMS device by properly extending the piping to
ensure constant ambient air flow. Following the manufacturer’ instructions, before and after connecting
the tubing extension to the inlet of TSI OPS 3300, stationary samples (background measurements) were
taken and compared in order to ensure that the particle chamber is not contaminated, thereby the use
of the tubing extension did not affect the quality of the measurements. Figure 4illustrates the mounted
low-cost APMS on the rooftop of the Mobile Lab for performing both field experiments.
Figure 4.
Details of the experimental setup: (
) Rooftop installation; (
) End of the certified instrument
alongside the low-cost air pollution monitoring system (APMS) ensuring common sample air flow;
) Calibrated optical particle counter instrument and power circuit draining voltage from the
van battery.
4. Field Calibration with Stationary Measurements
Given that the low-cost APMS records a new measurement every 4 s, some tens of thousands
PM sensor readings were made available for calibration purposes in the frame of this work through a
stationary experiment. The first set of training data (from roadside measurements) investigated the
effect of ambient conditions on the system’s accuracy and compared it with the calibrated instruments
of the Mobile Lab. To this end, the collected data from both measurement systems were post-processed
with loess smoothers and the resulting plots were examined for linearity. The strengths of correlations
and quantitative relationships in the pairwise plots were extracted with the use of the coefficients
of determination (R
) from fitted ordinary linear regression models. As described in Section 5,
the accuracy of the linear calibrations was identified with the computation of well-established error
metrics on the test dataset (from the mobile run). In addition, the statistical weights of measured
parameters such as temperature and relative humidity on instrument performance were evaluated
with sensitivity analysis.
Sensors 2018,18, 1056 7 of 16
4.1. Temperature and Relative Humidity
Figure 5presents the measured temperature from the two devices during the roadside stationary
run. There is satisfactory agreement between the two instruments with the exception of daylight
hours with sunshine. In this case, the electronics housed inside the low-cost APMS provide readings
with higher values, most probably due to the solar radiation heating up the enclosure and to the
contribution of excess heat from the components. The coefficient of determination between the two
time series was calculated and found to be approximately 0.879.
Figure 5. Time series of temperature measurements with 1 min resolution.
Relative humidity measured in the box varied from 20% to 90% over the course of the experiment,
as detailed in Figure 6. During night hours, the humidity values are almost identical. However, during
daytime, the readings are affected by the changes in temperature of the enclosure due to the solar
radiation heating up the enclosure. In addition, relative humidity levels from the prototype decrease
by excess heat emitted by the housed electronic components. The coefficient of determination between
the two time series is high (0.822). As a side observation, the measurements confirm that the recorded
humidity levels follow (inversely) the trend of temperature.
Figure 6. Time series of relative humidity measurements with 1 min resolution.
4.2. PM2.5 Concentrations
The time series of PM2.5 concentration data from the instruments deployed outside CERTH/HIT
for a period of three days are illustrated in Figure 7. As expected, night-time values were higher than
daytime concentrations, directly linked to the descent of the boundary layer. Some recorded data
Sensors 2018,18, 1056 8 of 16
loss during night-time occurred due to the limitations of data storage of the TSI OPS 3330 instrument.
At a first glance, there was a significant deviation between the low-cost APMS and the comparison
instrument. Although the absolute values are quite different, the correlation between the two PM2.5
readings is high, as the coefficient of determination was 0.932, which is promising for the low-cost
sensor, yet suggests that the sensor readings require adjustment in order to improve the accuracy of
the low-cost APMS output.
Figure 7.
Time series of PM2.5 concentration measurements with 1 min resolution (data collected from
March 6 to March 8, 2017).
4.3. Linear Regression Models
Following the objective to calibrate the low-cost PM2.5 sensor, two linear regression models
were fitted in the R programming language [
]. The resulting regression models are given in
Equations (1) and (2), with 0.932 and 0.947 coefficients of determination respectively.
PM2.5model1 =1.473073 +0.216347·PM2.5sensor, (1)
PM2.5model2 =8.64763 +0.36929·T+0.05850·RH +0.22606·PM2.5sensor, (2)
where PM2.5
and PM2.5
are the adjusted output of the two linear regression models in
terms of PM2.5 concentrations, while T, RH and PM2.5 sensor are the sensor readings of temperature,
relative humidity and PM2.5 concentrations respectively.
Regarding the sensitivity analysis, the computed probabilities for model 1 indicated that there
is a statistically significant covariance between the PM2.5 readings of TSI OPS 3330 and the PM2.5
concentration measurements from the low-cost sensor (pvalue associated with PM2.5 concentration
coefficient <2
). In the case of model 2, the analysis shows that there is also a statistically
significant relationship with temperature and relative humidity measurements from the low-cost
sensor (pvalues associated to temperature and relative humidity coefficients <2
). Given that
the second model presented an increased adjusted R
value (0.947) compared to the first one which
assumes a correlation solely between the PM2.5 concentrations of the two instruments, the second
model is expected to provide a better prediction.
Figure 8presents a pair-wise plot of the measurements by TSI OPS 3330, readings of the low-cost
sensor (SDS011) and the output of the derived regression models in order to verify the linear regression
assumption, indicating that the data points are randomly dispersed around the y=xdiagonal and
therefore the linear model is appropriate for the PM2.5 range under study (2 to 10
). As shown
in Equation (2), the parameters of temperature and relative humidity are introduced in model 2.
Thus, the impact of temperature and relative humidity variations on the raw measurements of the
low-cost PM2.5 sensor is shown in the second and fourth panel of the first row of plots in Figure 8,
where the value of the coefficient of determination between the raw measurements of the low-cost
Sensors 2018,18, 1056 9 of 16
PM2.5 sensor and those from TSI OPS 3330 increases from 0.93 (model 1) to 0.95 (model 2) when
temperature and relative humidity measurements are taken into account in the regression model. As a
side observation, it is noted that relevant data from exposure to a highly contaminated environment
are needed to improve the accuracy of PM2.5 detection for higher values of concentration.
Figure 8.
Pairs plot of comparisons between the TSI OPS 3330 measurements, low-cost sensor readings
and the output of the derived regression models from the roadside stationary experiment performed
from March 6 to March 8, 2017. Upper right section depicts the R
as computed by the Pearson method,
while lower-left set of panels present pairwise plots of 1 min averages with loess smoothers applied.
It is noted that the plots in the same row have the same scale in the y axis (in
), while the plots
in the same column have the same scale in the x axis (in µg/m3).
5. Mobile Run Validation
For validation purposes, the resulting linear regression models were tested on data collected
during a mobile run in the city of Thessaloniki, Greece, following the route shown in Figure 9.
The duration of the route was 1 h and 15 min and high deviations of PM2.5 concentration levels
were measured by the TSI OPS 3330 instrument. Figure 10 shows the comparison of the estimated
PM2.5 concentrations using both fitted models versus the readings of the certified optical particle sizer.
The error metrics, namely root mean squared errors (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE) and mean
absolute percentage error (MAPE), are reported in Table 1, where the second model gives a slightly
better fitting based on the lower RMSE value compared to the first model as expected. At this point,
it is noted that the estimation accuracy of both models could be potentially improved if more data
were available. In addition, depending on the requirements of the intended application, the results
suggest that the accuracy of the system can be slightly improved with the inclusion from the possible
contribution of temperature and relative humidity parameters.
Sensors 2018,18, 1056 10 of 16
Figure 9.
Route followed during the mobile testing in the area of Thessaloniki, Greece on 9 March 2017.
Figure 10.
Time series of PM2.5 concentrations with 1 min resolution from the mobile test run in the
area of Thessaloniki, Greece on 9 March 2017. The two fitted linear regression models are compared
with the readings of the optical particle sizer.
Table 1. Error metrics for the mobile run test (without lag correction).
Model RMSE (µg/m3) MAE (µg/m3)MAPE (%)
PM2.5model1 2.26 1.76 22.3
PM2.5model2 1.97 1.56 21.6
A close examination of Figure 10 reveals that the estimates of PM2.5 concentrations by the linear
regression models are shifted with respect to the output of the certified optical particle sizer. Thus, the
cross-correlations of the corresponding time series were calculated in order to determine the time
delay between them. After determining the lag, where the time series are best aligned by calculating
the argmax of the cross-correlation function, the time delay was eliminated in each case and the error
metrics for the mobile run test were recalculated, as shown in Table 2. Specifically, the time series
are best aligned at lag 1, which corresponds to a time delay of 1 min given that the time series were
averaged to 1 min resolution. The error values of the estimated PM2.5 concentrations by the linear
regression models with respect to the readings of TSI OPS 3330 are significantly reduced after the lag
correction in both cases. This finding suggests that the response of the low-cost APMS presents a delay
Sensors 2018,18, 1056 11 of 16
when compared to the certified optical particle sizer that affects the estimation accuracy during mobile
applications. On the one hand, this delay may be attributed to the properties and limitations of the
specific low-cost PM2.5 sensor that was employed. On the other hand, it should be emphasized that
the mobile test run was performed with the Mobile Lab under urban traffic conditions, where abrupt
changes of PM2.5 concentrations were observed, as also revealed by the spikes in Figure 10, possibly
due to the high spatial dispersion of the measurements in an urban environment while the Mobile Lab
was in motion and thus the potentially high difference of PM2.5 concentrations between successive
measurements. Nevertheless, it is noted that the adjusted output of the low-cost APMS (as derived
from the regression models) maintains a sufficient level of accuracy in both cases, that is, with and
without lag correction, under the conditions of the mobile test run, where abrupt variations in PM
concentrations are likely to occur. It is also clarified that: (i) the results in Tables 1and 2refer to the
errors metrics of the output of the linear regression models in the frame of the mobile test run; (ii) the
regression models were derived from the measurements of the stationary experiment (described in
Section 4); and (iii) the stationary experiment reflects different conditions with potentially smoother
changes of PM2.5 concentrations between successive measurements.
Table 2. Error metrics for the mobile run test (with lag correction).
Model RMSE (µg/m3) MAE (µg/m3)MAPE (%)
PM2.5model1 1.80 1.40 17.21
PM2.5model2 1.40 1.11 15.21
6. Case Study
The low-cost APMS is further equipped with an on-board GPS module, enabling the data logger
to capture directly in real-time geo-referenced data that are relevant to the exposure of road users to
ambient PM concentration levels. To demonstrate the intended application with respect to the necessity
for collecting fine-grained spatio-temporal PM2.5 profiles in an urban setting, the proposed APMS was
employed for an e-bike run in Mons, Belgium on 6 August 2017. Specifically, the developed low-cost
device was mounted on an e-bike and was powered by the battery of the e-bike, as shown in Figure 11.
As a case study, the e-bike followed a route at the outskirts of the city from 19:05 to 20:45 in order to
collect measurements of PM2.5 concentrations. Figure 12 illustrates the raw measurements collected
by the low-cost PM2.5 sensor under study along the route as well as the corresponding output of the
two fitted linear regression models, using heat maps with the same scale. A first observation from the
comparison of the results is that model 1 smoothens the extreme values measured by the low-cost
PM2.5 sensor, as expected from Equation (1) that scales the raw PM2.5 concentration values by a factor
of 0.216347, while model 2 increases the baseline of the PM2.5 concentration values and introduces
additional extreme values in the data series compared to the raw measurements, taking into account
the contribution of temperature and relative humidity.
Figure 11.
Details of low-cost APMS installation for the intended application: (
) Device mounting on
e-bike; (b) Power supply by the battery of the e-bike.
Sensors 2018,18, 1056 12 of 16
Figure 13 shows the time series of PM2.5 concentration estimates of using the two regression
models versus the raw measurements of the low-cost PM2.5 sensor. The comparison of the time series
confirms that model 1 produces values within a shorter range, whereas model 2 produces higher
estimates at points where the low-cost PM2.5 sensor did not reach peak values. This can be attributed
to the linear dependency of model 2 on relative humidity as denoted in Equation (2), given that a
careful examination of Figure 13 clearly indicates that the spikes of PM2.5 concentrations produced by
model 2 coincide with the spikes of relative humidity measurements. At this point, it is important to
emphasize that the observed spikes of relative humidity are due to the fact that the e-bike was passing
by dense vegetation consisting of tall trees and thus do not necessarily constitute outliers. It is noted,
however, that both the raw measurements and the estimates of the regression models are within the
range from 1 to 5 µg/m3.
Figure 12.
Heat maps of PM2.5 concentrations during the e-bike run at the outskirts of Mons on
6 August 2017
: (
) Raw measurements of the on-board PM sensor; (
) Output of linear regression
model 1; (c) Output of linear regression model 2.
Sensors 2018,18, 1056 13 of 16
Figure 13.
Time series of PM2.5 concentrations with 1 min resolution and relative humidity
measurements from the e-bike run in Mons, Belgium on 6 August 2017. The two fitted linear regression
models are compared with the raw measurements of the low-cost PM2.5 sensor.
For the sake of completeness, the results of the e-bike run were compared to the values of PM2.5
concentrations retrieved from the Belgian Interregional Environment Agency portal [
]. The installed
instrument for measuring PM2.5 concentrations at the monitoring station of Mons is a GRIMM Portable
Laser Aerosol spectrometer and Dust Monitor Model 1.108/1.109. Readings from this station are
available with an hourly resolution and for the specific time frame on 6 August 2017 the average
values recorded were 6.5
at 19:00 h, 5.5
at 20:00 h and 5
at 21:00 h. Despite
the accuracy of the expensive equipment installed at the fixed monitoring station (compared to the
cost of the APMS proposed in this work), the hourly average values reflect a coarse-grained estimate
of the exposure of the general population in the area to PM2.5 concentrations, taking into account
that the station is located 6.3 km away from the beginning of the test route followed by the e-bike.
Combining all the above, the low-cost APMS appears to underestimate the PM2.5 concentrations
compared to the measurements by the fixed monitoring station, even with the model 2 that increases
the baseline of the raw measurements, yet it provides a compact, portable and inexpensive solution
for capturing in real-time geo-referenced data of PM2.5 concentrations in order to create fine-grained
spatio-temporal profiles.
7. Conclusions
This paper examines whether the proposed low-cost implementation can provide a promising
alternative for an integrated APMS dedicated to PM2.5 concentration estimation with sufficient
accuracy. To that end, the calibration of the developed system was performed with a Mobile Lab
equipped with a commercially available optical particle sizer as a certified comparison instrument
in a roadside stationary test. Then, the detection of this category of contaminants was tested in a
mobile run under an urban traffic scenario in order to validate the ability of the proposed system to
Sensors 2018,18, 1056 14 of 16
capture fine-grained spatio-temporal data of environmental interest. The observed delay between
the measurements of the comparison instrument and the low-cost APMS may be attributed to the
properties and limitations of the specific low-cost PM2.5 sensor that was employed. Despite of
the errors introduced due to the conditions of the mobile test run, the derived regression models
(which were developed to adjust the output of the low-cost APMS) maintain a high level of accuracy.
Hence, depending on the requirements of the intended application, this lack of very fast response could
be overcome by replacing the current component with a PM sensor that is more responsive to abrupt
changes. Last, this paper presented a case study to highlight the necessity of collecting high-resolution
geolocation data of PM2.5 concentrations in an urban setting by comparing the measurements collected
by the low-cost APMS mounted on an e-bike with those retrieved from the local fixed monitoring
station in Mons.
The accuracy of the system can be improved with further on-field calibration and validation.
At first, a wider range of PM2.5 concentrations must be accessed in order to reduce the residual errors
observed when measuring higher concentrations. More specifically, the possibility to examine a data
set from a longer run can result in a more precise data analysis, where the model coefficients can be
derived using cross-validation in order to determine the best values for the coefficients of the fitted
models. At this point, it is important to note that the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines
set the limit for the annual mean of PM2.5 to 10
]. In this regard, the proposed low-cost
APMS is fully capable of capturing incidents where this threshold value is exceeded. Furthermore,
a limitation of the proposed implementation is the risk of accumulating dust inside the PM sensors’
optical chamber, thus affecting the accuracy of the measurements. To this end, careful cleaning of the
chamber must be executed occasionally as part of the systems’ maintenance routine. Thus, future
work could focus on the study of dust accumulation effects on the accuracy of the sensor. Last, other
directions of future work include a comparative analysis with at least one other commercially available
low-cost PM sensor and already characterized in other publications, as well as a reproducibility study
based on more low-cost PM sensors of the same type.
This work was supported by the European Commission through the FP7 Project RE-SIZED
(Research Excellence for Solutions and Implementation of Net-Zero Energy City Districts) under grant agreement
No. 621408 and the COST Action TU1407 (Scientific and technical innovations for safer Powered Two
Wheelers (PTW)).
Author Contributions:
Konstantinos N. Genikomsakis and Christos S. Ioakimidis conceived and designed the
experiments; Nikolaos-Fivos Galatoulas and Dimitris Margaritis performed the experiments; Konstantinos N.
Genikomsakis, Nikolaos-Fivos Galatoulas, Panagiotis I. Dallas, Luis Miguel Candanedo Ibarra, Dimitris Margaritis
and Christos S. Ioakimidis analyzed the data; Dimitris Margaritis contributed calibrated measurement instruments;
Konstantinos N. Genikomsakis and Nikolaos-Fivos Galatoulas wrote the paper.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
D’Orey, P.M.; Ferreira, M. ITS for sustainable mobility: A survey on applications and impact assessment
tools. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2014,15, 477–493. [CrossRef]
Costabile, F.; Allegrini, I. A new approach to link transport emissions and air quality: An intelligent transport
system based on the control of traffic air pollution. Environ. Model. Softw. 2008,23, 258–267. [CrossRef]
Hasenfratz, D.; Saukh, O.; Walser, C.; Hueglin, C.; Fierz, M.; Arn, T.; Beutel, J.; Thiele, L. Deriving
high-resolution urban air pollution maps using mobile sensor nodes. Pervasive Mob. Comput.
16, 268–285. [CrossRef]
Penza, M.; Suriano, D.; Cassano, G.; Pfister, V.; Alvisi, M.; Rossi, R. Portable chemical sensor-system for
urban air-pollution monitoring. In Proceedings of the 14th International Meeting on Chemical Sensors,
Nuremberg, Germany, 20–23 May 2012; pp. 1767–1770. [CrossRef]
Al-Ali, A.R.; Zualkernan, I.; Aloul, F. A mobile GPRS-sensors array for air pollution monitoring. IEEE Sens. J.
2010,10, 1666–1671. [CrossRef]
Sensors 2018,18, 1056 15 of 16
Elen, B.; Peters, J.; Poppel, M.V.; Bleux, N.; Theunis, J.; Reggente, M.; Standaert, A. The Aeroflex: A Bicycle
for Mobile Air Quality Measurements. Sensors 2013,13, 221–240. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Velasco, A.; Ferrero, R.; Gandino, F.; Montrucchio, B.; Rebaudengo, M. A Mobile and Low-Cost System for
Environmental Monitoring: A Case Study. Sensors 2016,16, 710. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kiefer, C.; Behrendt, F. Smart e-bike monitoring system: Real-time open source and open hardware GPS
assistance and sensor data for electrically-assisted bicycles. IET Intell. Transp. Syst.
,10, 79–88. [CrossRef]
Ioakimidis, C.S.; Rycerski, P.; Koutra, S.; Genikomsakis, K.N. A university e-bike sharing system used as a
real-time monitoring emissions tool under a smart city concept. World Electr. Veh. J. 2016,8, 953–963.
Mukherjee, A.; Stanton, L.G.; Graham, A.R.; Roberts, P.T. Assessing the Utility of Low-Cost Particulate
Matter Sensors over a 12-Week Period in the Cuyama Valley of California. Sensors
,17, 1805. [CrossRef]
Zikova, N.; Masiol, M.; Chalupa, D.C.; Rich, D.Q.; Ferro, A.R.; Hopke, P.K. Estimating Hourly Concentrations
of PM
across a Metropolitan Area Using Low-Cost Particle Monitors. Sensors
,17, 1922. [CrossRef]
Silva, R.A.; Adelman, Z.; Fry, M.M.; West, J.J. The impact of individual anthropogenic emissions sectors
on the global burden of human mortality due to ambient air pollution. Environ. Health Perspect.
1776–1784. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Park, S.S.; Kozawa, K.; Fruin, S.; Mara, S.; Hsu, Y.-K.; Jakober, C.; Winer, A.; Herner, J. Emission Factors
for High-Emitting Vehicles Based on On-Road Measurements of Individual Vehicle Exhaust with a Mobile
Measurement Platform. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2011,61, 1046–1056. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Choi, W.; He, M.; Barbesant, V.; Kozawa, K.H.; Mara, S.; Winer, A.M.; Paulson, S.E. Prevalence of wide area
impacts downwind of freeways under pre-sunrise stable atmospheric conditions. Atmos. Environ.
62, 318–327. [CrossRef]
Hu, S.; Paulson, S.E.; Fruin, S.; Kozawa, K.; Mara, S.; Winer, A.M. Observation of elevated air
pollutant concentrations in a residential neighborhood of Los Angeles California using a mobile platform.
Atmos. Environ. 2012,51, 311–319. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Yi, W.Y.; Lo, K.M.; Mak, T.; Leung, K.S.; Leung, Y.; Meng, M.L. A survey of wireless sensor network based air
pollution monitoring systems. Sensors 2015,15, 31392–31427. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kuhlbusch, T.; Quincey, P.; Fuller, G.; Kelly, F.; Mudway, I.; Viana, M.; Querol, X.; Alastuey, A.;
Katsouyanni, K.; Weijers, E.; et al. New Directions: The future of European urban air quality monitoring.
Atmos. Environ. 2014,87, 258–260. [CrossRef]
Kousoulidou, M.; Fontaras, G.; Ntziachristos, L.; Bonnel, P.; Samaras, Z.; Dilara, P. Use of portable
emissions measurement system (PEMS) for the development and validation of passenger car emission
factors. Atmos. Environ. 2013,64, 329–338. [CrossRef]
Rakowska, A.; Wong, K.; Townsend, T.; Chan, K.; Westerdahl, D.; Ng, S.; Moˇcnik, G.; Drinovec, L.; Ning, Z.
Impact of traffic volume and composition on the air quality and pedestrian exposure in urban street canyon.
Atmos. Environ. 2014,98, 260–270. [CrossRef]
Van Poppel, M.; Peters, J.; Bleux, N. Methodology for setup and data processing of mobile air quality
measurements to assess the spatial variability of concentrations in urban environments. Environ. Pollut.
183, 224–233. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
De Nazelle, A.; Seto, E.; Donaire-Gonzalez, D.; Mendez, M.; Matamala, J.; Nieuwenhuijsen, M.; Jerrett, M.
Improving estimates of air pollution exposure through ubiquitous sensing technologies. Environ. Pollut.
2013,176, 92–99. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Smith, J.P.; Li, X. AirSniffer: A smartphone-based sensor system for body area climate and air quality
monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2016 10th International Symposium on Medical Information and
Communication Technology (ISMICT), Worcester, MA, USA, 20–23 March 2016; pp. 1–5. [CrossRef]
Thompson, J.E. Crowd-sourced air quality studies: A review of the literature & portable sensors.
Trends Environ. Anal. Chem. 2016,11, 23–34. [CrossRef]
Leonardi, C.; Cappellotto, A.; Caraviello, M.; Lepri, B.; Antonelli, F. SecondNose: An air quality mobile
crowdsensing system. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun,
Fast, Foundational, NordiCHI ’14, Helsinki, Finland, 26–30 October 2014; pp. 1051–1054. [CrossRef]
Sensors 2018,18, 1056 16 of 16
Jafari, H.; Li, X.; Qian, L.; Chen, Y. Community based sensing: A test bed for environment air quality
monitoring using smartphone paired sensors. In Proceedings of the 2015 36th IEEE Sarnoff Symposium,
Newark, NJ, USA, 20–22 September 2015; pp. 12–17. [CrossRef]
Deville Cavellin, L.; Weichenthal, S.; Tack, R.; Ragettli, M.; Smargiassi, A.; Hatzopoulou, M. Investigating
the Use Of Portable Air Pollution Sensors to Capture the Spatial Variability Of Traffic-Related Air Pollution.
Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016,50, 313–320. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mar´c, M.; Tobiszewski, M.; Zabiegała, B.; Guardia, M.; Namie´snik, J. Current air quality analytics and
monitoring: A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2015,853, 116–126. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Maricq, M.M. Monitoring Motor vehicle pm emissions: An evaluation of three portable low-cost aerosol
instruments. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2013,47, 564–573. [CrossRef]
Laser PM2.5 Sensor Specification—Product Model: SDS011—Version: V1.3. Available online: http://www. (accessed on 27 February 2018).
Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Jing, H.; Zhang, Q.; Jiang, J.; Biswas, P. Laboratory Evaluation and Calibration of Three
Low-Cost Particle Sensors for Particulate Matter Measurement. Aerosol Sci. Technol.
,49, 1063–1077.
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing:
Vienna, Austria, 2014.
Belgian Interregional Environment Agency Portal. Interactive Viewer. Available online: http://www.irceline.
be/en/air-quality/measurements/monitoring-stations/interactive- viewer (accessed on 20 March 2018).
World Health Organization. WHO Releases Country Estimates on Air Pollution Exposure and Health Impact.
Available online:
(accessed on 20 March 2018).
2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (
... The deficiencies of conventional PM monitoring paradigm along with the public acute concerns about the adverse PMrelated health effects, particularly in the developing countries and regions, foster the development of personal PM exposure monitoring systems [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], which are complementary to the conventional ones, with portable or wearable monitoring devices utilizing sensors that are compact, lowcost, power-efficient, and yet instantaneously providing data with quality at a certain degree. These emerging monitoring systems are typically referred to as practical applications of participatory sensing [47] or community sensing [48]. ...
... In this field experiment, rather than calibrating every single WePIN against the REFN, their WPUW PM 2.5 measurements are considered representative and the calibration results were achieved by fitting the WPUW-REFN PM 2.5 data pairs into a set of parametric models, namely the OLS, the MLH, and the ADV model 37,38 , in which case the results, such as calibration parameters, would not be significantly biased owing to narrow concentration range (for devices with limited data availability) and/or random fluctuations (partially mitigated by unit-wisely averaging their PM measurements). The fundamental rationale behind the representativeness of the WPUW measurements is detailed in the following paragraph. ...
... Similar to the PMSA sensor, the TEMP (28°C to 38°C from WPUW or 25°C to 36°C from REFN) had negligible effects on the WePINs' PM 2.5 measurements. 38 The ADV model served as evidence of the existence of better calibration models only because it violated the key assumptions of a MLR model detailed in section III-C3; the calibrated WPUW PM 2.5 measurements from it should be omitted when evaluating against the REFN in section V-B5. and s slope = 0.045) but varying intercepts (intercept = 0.107 and s intercept = 1.920), the Eq. ...
To mitigate the significant biases/errors in research studying the associations between PM and health, which are introduced by the coarse/inadequate assessments of PM exposure from conventional PM monitoring paradigm, a personalized monitoring system consisting of a low-cost wearable PM device is proposed. However, due to the absence of a unifying evaluation protocol for low-cost PM sensors, the evaluation results/performance specifications from existing studies/datasheets are of limited reference values when attempting to determine the best candidate for the proposed system. In this regard, the authors appeal to the research community to develop a standardized evaluation protocol for low-cost PM sensors/devices, and a unifying attempt is established in this manuscript by adopting the definitive terminology from international documents and the evaluation metrics regarded as best practices. Collocated on the rooftop of the HKUST Supersite, four empirically selected PM sensors were compared against each other and calibrated against two reference monitors. They were then evaluated against the reference following the protocol. The PlanTower PMS-A003 sensor was selected for the wearable device as it outperformed the others in terms of affordability, portability, detection capability, data quality, as well as humidity and condensation insusceptibility. An automated approach was proposed to identify and remove the condensation associated abnormal measurements. The proposed device has better affordability and portability as well as similar usability and data accessibility compared to those existing devices recognized. The first 10 devices were also evaluated and calibrated at the Supersite. Additional 120 units were manufactured and delivered to the subjects to acquire their daily PM2.5 exposures for investigating the association with subclinical atherosclerosis.
... Several other researcher groups have developed low-cost PM monitors that can be used in mobile monitoring [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. The Smart-P monitor was inspired in part by their work and represents an effort to overcome operational challenges by substantially reducing the weight, size, and cost. ...
... Its wide detection range of 0.0 to 999.9 µg m −3 also allows measurement of low levels as well as hotspots of PM2.5 concentration. Several other researcher groups have developed low-cost PM monitors that can be used in mobile monitoring [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. The Smart-P monitor was inspired in part by their work and represents an effort to overcome operational challenges by substantially reducing the weight, size, and cost. ...
... The accuracy decreased substantially with high relative humidity of more than 80%. Genikomsakis et al. compared an SDS011 sensor to a commercial high-quality optical particle sizing instrument (Model: TSI OPS 3330), which had a U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) traceable calibration [34]. The SDS011 sensor reading was highly correlated to the TSI OPS 3330 reading, with an R 2 of 0.933 with one-minute average data for a three-day measurement period. ...
Full-text available
The concentration of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is known to vary spatially across a city landscape. Current networks of regulatory air quality monitoring are too sparse to capture these intra-city variations. In this study, we developed a low-cost (60 USD) portable PM2.5 monitor called Smart-P, for use on bicycles, with the goal of mapping street-level variations in PM2.5 concentration. The Smart-P is compact in size (85 × 85 × 42 mm) and light in weight (147 g). Data communication and geolocation are achieved with the cyclist’s smartphone with the help of a user-friendly app. Good agreement was observed between the Smart-P monitors and a regulatory-grade monitor (mean bias error: −3.0 to 1.5 μg m−3 for the four monitors tested) in ambient conditions with relative humidity ranging from 38 to 100%. Monitor performance decreased in humidity > 70% condition. The measurement precision, represented as coefficient of variation, was 6 to 9% in stationary mode and 6% in biking mode across the four tested monitors. Street tests in a city with low background PM2.5 concentrations (8 to 9 μg m−3) and in two cities with high background concentrations (41 to 74 μg m−3) showed that the Smart-P was capable of observing local emission hotspots and that its measurement was not sensitive to bicycle speed. The low-cost and user-friendly nature are two features that make the Smart-P a good choice for empowering citizen scientists to participate in local air quality monitoring.
... Então, através de um fotodetector, é possível obter um sinal elétrico que é afetado pela massa da partícula detectada [N. Genikomsakis et al., 2018;Shandong Nova Fitness Co., 2015]. Apesar de sensores MP-BC serem considerados alternativas viáveis para a realização de medidas [Morawska et al., 2018], restam desafios que incluem exatidão, confiabilidade, repetibilidade e calibração [Concas et al., 2021;Kosmopoulos et al., 2020;Zusman et al., 2020]. ...
Conference Paper
Sensores de baixo custo de material particulado (MP-BC) vêm sendo estudados ao redor do mundo como alternativa viável às custosas estações de referência para monitoramento de qualidade do ar. Porém, sensores de MP-BC são imprecisos e sujeitos a incertezas, sofrendo com as condições do ambiente em que operam. Este trabalho analisa o impacto da temperatura e umidade em 5 sensores MP-BC durante um período de 4 meses. Os sensores MP-BC são comparados com um equipamento de referência visando propor uma metodologia para selecionar o sensor de MP-BC que comporá uma estação de baixo custo de qualidade do ar no contexto de cidades inteligentes. Resultados demostram que os sensores avaliados apresentam maior correlação com o equipamento de referência quando são retirados da amostra leituras em que temperatura e umidade são críticas.
... PM values ranged from 0 to 5 lg/m 3 , with the resulting R 2 values ranging from 0.93 to 0.95, after taking temperature and relative humidity into account. 13 Badura et al. compared a group of three copies of the Nova sensor, together with groups of three other similarly low-cost systems in a common box, under the same measurement conditions over half a year near a park and a residential area in Wroclaw, Poland. The Nova was found to be one of the most precise in terms of reproducibility between units, and also when compared to the control unit with an R 2 value of 0.82 using 15-min averages, but it was found to be sensitive to high relative humidities (RH > 80%). ...
Full-text available
Airborne particulate matter (PM) is a concern for both occupational health and the environment, and, in the ferroalloy industry, the level of such particles in the air can be considerable. Small, low-cost sensors for measuring PM have generated interest in recent years, providing widespread monitoring of PM levels in the environment. However, such sensors have not yet been sufficiently tested under conditions relevant for the indoor environment of the metallurgical industry. This study aims to bridge this gap by benchmarking the commercial, low-cost Nova PM SDS011 particle sensor in two different ferroalloy plants. Benchmarking was performed against the Fidas 200S, which has been suitability-tested and certified according to the latest EU requirements (EN 15267, EN 16450). Twelve Nova sensors were tested over 3 months at a silicomanganese alloy (SiMn) plant, and 35 sensors were tested during 1 month at a silicon (Si) plant. The results showed that the low-cost Nova sensors exhibited all the same trends and peaks in terms of PM concentration, but measured lower dust concentrations than the Fidas 200S. The difference was larger at the silicon plant, which is in line with expectations, due to the size and mass fractions of particles in Si dust compared to SiMn dust, and to the larger measurement range of the Fidas, measuring down to 180 nm compared to the Nova which measures down to 300 nm. Despite the difference in absolute values, the Nova sensors were found to provide data for comparing dust levels over time for different processes, at different locations, and under different operational conditions.
... Although these methods tend to yield lower quality data, they can be used in a significant number of locations simultaneously, thereby enabling the high-resolution assessment mapping of city pollution. Recent work by Genikomsakis and colleagues [17] has demonstrated that low-cost sensors work very well for collecting fine-grained spatio-temporal [particulate matter concentration] profiles in urban areas. ...
Air pollution is a major threat to human health in India. More than three-quarters of the people in India are exposed to pollution levels higher than the limits recommended by the National Ambient Air Quality Standards in India and significantly higher than those recommended by the World Health Organization. Despite the poor air quality, the monitoring of air pollution levels is limited even in large urban areas in India and virtually absent in small towns and rural areas. The lack of data results in a minimal understanding of spatial and temporal patterns of air pollutants at local and regional levels. This paper is the second in a planned series of papers presenting particulate air pollution trends monitored in small cities and towns in India. The findings presented here are important for framing state and regional level policies for addressing air pollution problems in urban areas, and achieve the sustainable development goals (SDGs) linked to public health, reduction in the adverse environmental impact of cities, and adaptation to climate change, as indicated by SDGs 3.9, 11.6 and 11.b.KeywordsAmbient air pollutionAir pollution in small townsDiurnal and weekly cycle of PM pollutionPM isoplethsSpatio-temporal averaging of data from mobile sensorsSustainable development goals
Full-text available
Air pollution exhibits hyper-local variation, especially near emissions sources. In addition to people's time-activity patterns, this variation is the most critical element determining exposure. Pollution exposure is time-activity- and path-dependent, with specific behaviours such as mode of commuting and time spent near a roadway or in a park playing a decisive role. Compared to conventional air pollution monitoring stations, nodes containing low-cost air pollution sensors can be deployed with very high density. In this study, a network of 18 nodes using low-cost air pollution sensors was deployed in Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffordshire, UK, in June 2020. Each node measured a range of species including nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), and particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10); this study focuses on NO2 and PM2.5 over a 1-year period from 1 August 2020 to 1 October 2021. A simple and effective temperature, scale, and offset correction was able to overcome data quality issues associated with temperature bias in the NO2 readings. In its recent update, the World Health Organization (WHO) dramatically reduced annual exposure limit values from 40 to 10 µg m−3 for NO2 and from 10 to 5 µg m−3 for PM2.5. We found that the average annual mean NO2 concentration for the network was 17.5 µg m−3 and 8.1 µg m−3 for PM2.5. While in exceedance of the WHO guideline levels, these average concentrations do not exceed legally binding UK/EU standards. The network average NO2 concentration was 12.5 µg m−3 higher than values reported by a nearby regional air quality monitoring station, showing the critical importance of monitoring close to sources before pollution is diluted. We demonstrate how data from a low-cost air pollution sensor network can reveal insights into patterns of air pollution and help determine whether sources are local or non-local. With spectral analysis, we investigate the variation of the pollution levels and identify typical periodicities. Both NO2 and PM2.5 have contributions from high-frequency sources; however, the low-frequency sources are significantly different. Using spectral analysis, we determine that at least 54.3±4.3 % of NO2 is from local sources, whereas, in contrast, only 37.9±3.5 % of PM2.5 is local.
Full-text available
Weather in Malaysia are hot and humid throughout the year thus having a sudden rain can disrupt the drying of laundries and make them wet. In this study, an automated retractable roof system was developed to overcome this problem. The development and implementation of this study enables user to monitor the parameters at the laundry suspension area by using their smartphone and prevent the laundries getting wet from rain. This study uses humidity sensors, Ultraviolet (UV) sensor, rain sensor, and temperature sensor to detect parameter such as humidity, UV intensity, presence of water and temperature respectively. Data from the sensors were collected and analysed to determine the values of parameters when rains occurred. These parameters were indicated as part of weather prediction study. From experiment, the retractable roof will open and close depended on condition met by the system. In addition, the system can communicate with the user’s phone through using Internet connection. The Blynk application in the smartphone allows the user to monitor and control the system through internet connection between the application and microcontroller. This study will be helpful for non-commercial use and can be expanded to commercial use as with further improvement.
Full-text available
Aromatherapy candles with essential oils which can provides a therapeutic treatments have been made to maintain and improve our wellbeing. In this paper, a mini prototype of automated aromatherapy candle process plant using IoT and WSN has been proposed and developed. The main process of producing aromatherapy candle are heating and mixing. To produce the right quality of the aromatherapy candle, the quantity of the raw material is important. Heating process will be control by using ESP8266 based PID controller and monitored by using Open Source Programmable Logic Controller called OpenPLC that run on Raspberry Pi. The software is efficient because can support users over the entire plant and process. Mixing process will mix the raw material evenly using agitator motor with specific temperature. The whole process in this work can be monitored and control through PC via this implementation of software. To obtain the best quality of this work, the set point of temperature need to be control and the plant able to be achieved after second test of the study. As the result, this study able to produces aromatherapy candle with better quality in minimal time. This study also able to control the candle from releasing too many Volatile Organic Compound that can effect human life. Armed with the wealth of relevant information presented in this article, it is hoped that readers will have greatly benefited and gained a thorough understanding on how to develop an automated aroma therapy candle process planting using IoT and WSN. With further research put forth into this study, it is also hope it could be an advantage in innovation development and can be implemented in real life manufacturing industry.
Full-text available
There is concern regarding the heterogeneity of exposure to airborne particulate matter (PM) across urban areas leading to negatively biased health effects models. New, low-cost sensors now permit continuous and simultaneous measurements to be made in multiple locations. Measurements of ambient PM were made from October to April 2015–2016 and 2016–2017 to assess the spatial and temporal variability in PM and the relative importance of traffic and wood smoke to outdoor PM concentrations in Rochester, NY, USA. In general, there was moderate spatial inhomogeneity, as indicated by multiple pairwise measures including coefficient of divergence and signed rank tests of the value distributions. Pearson correlation coefficients were often moderate (~50% of units showed correlations >0.5 during the first season), indicating that there was some coherent variation across the area, likely driven by a combination of meteorological conditions (wind speed, direction, and mixed layer heights) and the concentration of PM2.5 being transported into the region. Although the accuracy of these PM sensors is limited, they are sufficiently precise relative to one another and to research grade instruments that they can be useful is assessing the spatial and temporal variations across an area and provide concentration estimates based on higher-quality central site monitoring data.
Full-text available
The use of low-cost air quality sensors has proliferated among non-profits and citizen scientists, due to their portability, affordability, and ease of use. Researchers are examining the sensors for their potential use in a wide range of applications, including the examination of the spatial and temporal variability of particulate matter (PM). However, few studies have quantified the performance (e.g., accuracy, precision, and reliability) of the sensors under real-world conditions. This study examined the performance of two models of PM sensors, the AirBeam and the Alphasense Optical Particle Counter (OPC-N2), over a 12-week period in the Cuyama Valley of California, where PM concentrations are impacted by wind-blown dust events and regional transport. The sensor measurements were compared with observations from two well-characterized instruments: the GRIMM 11-R optical particle counter, and the Met One beta attenuation monitor (BAM). Both sensor models demonstrated a high degree of collocated precision (R² = 0.8–0.99), and a moderate degree of correlation against the reference instruments (R² = 0.6–0.76). Sensor measurements were influenced by the meteorological environment and the aerosol size distribution. Quantifying the performance of sensors in real-world conditions is a requisite step to ensuring that sensors will be used in ways commensurate with their data quality.
Full-text available
This work intents to describe a new approach that would be able to combine the positive effects from the use of an E-Bike sharing system in a medium-large population urban city of Belgium demonstrated initially in case of the local University Campuses along with the use of the E-Bikes as environmental mobile sensing units.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Poor air quality is among the top environmental public health risks and significant amount of costs and productivity losses are considered to be related to poor indoor air quality. Air quality is extremely difficult for human beings to feel or sense so that most people cannot tell whether or not air quality is bad. Meanwhile, most of the existing air quality measurement devices are designed for professionals; they are expensive and beyond the reach of average users. In this paper, we present the AirSniffer, a smart phone-based sensor system, which can be conveniently used for personal body area micro-climate monitoring. The sensor node is implemented with a popular Arduino prototyping board, a Bluetooth module, and a number of low-cost micro sensors. Overall system architecture and the detailed system design are presented in the paper. Some measurement results are also presented to demonstrate the capabilities as well as the usefulness of the system.
Full-text available
Northern Italy has one of the highest air pollution levels in the European Union. This paper describes a mobile wireless sensor network system intended to complement the already existing official air quality monitoring systems of the metropolitan town of Torino. The system is characterized by a high portability and low cost, in both acquisition and maintenance. The high portability of the system aims to improve the spatial distribution and resolution of the measurements from the official static monitoring stations. Commercial PM10 and O3 sensors were incorporated into the system and were subsequently tested in a controlled environment and in the field. The test in the field, performed in collaboration with the local environmental agency, revealed that the sensors can provide accurate data if properly calibrated and maintained. Further tests were carried out by mounting the system on bicycles in order to increase their mobility.
Development of low-cost, portable, and low-power devices for monitoring airborne pollutants is a crucial step towards developing improved air quality models and better quantitating the health effects of human and animal exposure. This review article summarizes recent developments in the field within the context of the establishment/expansion of high spatial and temporal resolution air quality monitoring networks. Current ‘crowd-sourced’ monitoring efforts are summarized, and recent advances in chemical sensors required for these networks are described. No ‘perfect’ sensing platform, that meets the requirements of low-cost, portability, selectivity, and sensitivity has yet been achieved. This highlights the need for investment in the fundamental analytical chemistry of the sensing platforms required to achieve such ‘smart-cities.’ Such investment should include the development of new sensor technologies, and provide for calibration and performance validation for systems enacted. In addition to summarizing the current state-of-the-art, reflections on future needs are also offered.
Background: Exposure to ozone and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) can cause adverse health effects, including premature mortality due to cardiopulmonary diseases and lung cancer. Recent studies quantify global air pollution mortality but not the contribution of different emissions sectors, or they focus on a specific sector. Objectives: We estimate the global mortality burden of anthropogenic ozone and PM2.5, and the impact of five emissions sectors, using a global chemical transport model at a finer horizontal resolution (0.67°x0.5°) than previous studies. Methods: We perform simulations for 2005 with MOZART-4 zeroing-out all anthropogenic emissions and emissions from specific sectors (All Transportation, Land Transportation, Energy, Industry, and Residential & Commercial). We estimate premature mortality using a log-linear concentration-response function for ozone and an integrated exposure-response model for PM2.5. Results: We estimate 2.23 (95% CI: 1.04, 3.33) million deaths/year related to anthropogenic PM2.5, with the highest mortality in East Asia (48%). The Residential & Commercial sector has the greatest impact globally - 675 (428, 899) thousand deaths/year - and in most regions. Land Transportation dominates in North America (32% of total anthropogenic PM2.5 mortality), and it has almost the same impact (24%) as Residential & Commercial (27%) in Europe. Anthropogenic ozone is associated with 493 (122, 989) thousand deaths/year, with the Land Transportation sector having the greatest impact globally (16%). Conclusions: The contributions of emissions sectors to ambient air pollution-related mortality differ among regions, suggesting region-specific air pollution control strategies. Global sector-specific actions targeting Land Transportation (ozone) and Residential & Commercial (PM2.5) would particularly benefit human health.