ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Social Support, Well-being, and Quality of Life Among Individuals on the Autism Spectrum

American Academy of Pediatrics
Pediatrics
Authors:

Abstract

Social support plays a critical role in the quality of life (adaptive functioning and subjective well-being) of individuals on the autism spectrum across the lifespan.
PEDIATRICS Volume 141, number s4, April 2018:e20164300
SUPPLEMENT ARTICLE
Social Support, Well-being, and
Quality of Life Among Individuals
on the Autism Spectrum
Steven K. Kapp, PhD
Human Development & Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; and Sociology and Egenis, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
DOI: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1542/ peds. 2016- 4300N
Accepted for publication Sep 26, 2017
Address correspondence to Steven K. Kapp, PhD, University of Exeter, Egenis, Byrne House, St Germans Road, Exeter EX4 4PJ, United Kingdom. E-mail: s.k.kapp@
exeter.ac.uk
PEDIATRICS (ISSN Numbers: Print, 0031-4005; Online, 1098-4275).
Copyright © 2018 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The author has indicated he has no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
FUNDING: Funded in part by the Health Resources and Services Administration of the US Department of Health and Human Services under grant UA3MC11055,
Autism Intervention Research Network on Behavioral Health. The information or content and conclusions are those of the author and should not be construed as the
official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by the Health Resources and Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human
Services, or the US Government. Dr Kapp is also supported by the Wellcome Trust, grant 108676/Z/15/Z.
POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The author has indicated he has no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Diverse theoretical perspectives1
3 and empirical findings4, 5 reveal development as a complex
interaction between nature and nurture, yet the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder is used to
classify neurodevelopmental disability mainly on the basis of individual-level social dysfunction.
Self-advocates have organized the neurodiversity movement to reclaim autism as a part of identity
(eg, using identity-first language such as autistic person, as in the case of the author, rather
than person-first language such as person with autism
6,
7) and support civil rights. We argue
that social environments contribute substantially to disability and seek quality of life, defined in
terms of objective factors of adaptive functioning, such as independent living and employment,
as well as in terms of subjective well-being, which requires self-determination to play as active
a role as possible in making decisions to have the experiences one wants. Yet we argue against
normalization and cure, in part because many autistic traits can function in neutral or positive
ways, although other people may misunderstand or stigmatize atypical behaviors.8
10 Indeed, the
following narrative review developed from empirical evidence replicated by independent research
teams argues against a linear relationship between autism symptoms and impaired functioning,
across developmental periods and in multiple domains of both “objective” quality of life and
in subjective well-being. In the following syntheses, I suggest that effective social support and
subjective well-being mediate whether autistic people achieve a high quality of life.
by guest on March 8, 2019www.aappublications.org/newsDownloaded from
PEDIATRICS Volume 141, number s4, April 2018 S363
ADAPTIVE FUNCTIONING
Parental Support
Language Acquisition
Actively responsive rather than
directive or less involved parenting
helps to promote positive social
engagement, especially in infants
susceptible to autism.11
13 Responsive
parenting (eg, parenting that follows
childrens focus of attention and labels
objects of interest while allowing the
child to take the lead) contributes to
young autistic childrens language
development,
14
17 particularly
among those who need it most: those
with lower levels of expression.18
21
Although the same principle applies
in typical development,
22 responsive
caregiving and input may especially
benefit language learning for autistic
children,
23,
24 particularly for those
who have more difficulty responding
to others attention.25 Parents
strategies to synchronize their
behavior in response to their autistic
childs, such as matching his or her
pace, may drive language gains from
joint parent-child engagement26,
27 through encouraging the child to
initiate interactions,
28 which may
especially benefit the children who
have the most difficulty producing
their own goal-directed actions in
reaction to others movements.29,
30 This aligns well with the advice
of autism rights movement founder
Sinclair,
31 in a foundational essay
primarily for parents, to let your
child teach you a little of her language,
guide you a little way into his world
as a means of helping the child adapt
to the dominant culture and for the
well-being of the family. Fortunately,
learning to speak their childs
language as a parenting strategy
has had near-universal support,
regardless of peoples relationship
to autism or support for the
neurodiversity movements beliefs.7
Autism Acceptance
There is evidence to support the
benefits of parents acceptance of
their childrens autism across the
spectrum. Parents acceptance of
their childs autism32
35 and positive
emotions toward their child36 do not
relate to child characteristics such
as developmental level or autism
severity as assessed by experimental
measures. Instead, higher autism
severity, as assessed by the parents
questionnaire-based report,
sometimes inversely relates to their
acceptance of their childs autism,
37 which suggests that subjective
perception rather than empirically
demonstrated factors may drive
acceptance. An increase in autism
symptoms over time also relates to
more parental acceptance of a childs
autism,
38 likely because of a lowered
perception of the possibility for the
child to outgrow his or her challenges.
Parent-child reciprocity32,
35
and relationships39 have often
revealed independence from autism
severity, whereas the parents
acceptance of autism strengthens the
childs functioning in these areas.32,
34,
35
Mothers understanding of their
autistic child also may not relate to
child characteristics,
34 but acceptance
of their child's autism drives better
recognition of and responsiveness to
their child's communication, which in
turn improves the relationship,
40
likely in part through improving
maternal well-being.37 These findings
challenge diagnostic criteria that
largely implicate difficulties with
reciprocity and relationships as
problems of the labeled individual,
at least in the parent-child context,
and demonstrate the need for
further efforts to increase parents
acceptance of their childs autism.
School Inclusion
Academic Inclusion
Similarly, data reveal the benefits
of classroom inclusion for autistic
children with diverse intellectual and
academic needs. Early intervention
delivered in inclusive as opposed
to segregated preschool settings
predicts higher IQ in elementary
school, particularly for those with
initially greater social and adaptive
behavior impairments.41 In addition,
higher levels of educational inclusion
relate to better functioning for
autistic adolescents and adults,
beyond the effects of demographic
and individual characteristics.42
Furthermore, autistic adolescents
with intellectual disability had better
academic performance in inclusive
versus segregated classrooms,
43
likely in significant part because they
received more structured instruction
time44 and their educational plan
had greater focus on applied skill
development (as contrasted with rote
procedural goals45). These benefits
of inclusion appear driven in part by
higher expectations based in confident
understanding of needs,
46 more
naturalistic and responsive teaching
methods as opposed to behavioral
management,
47
50 and access to
typically developing peers.51
Social Inclusion
Beyond classroom inclusion, peers
ineffective attitudes rather than
severe autism symptoms pose
a substantial barrier to social
integration in and outside school.
In educationally inclusive school
environments, peers may more
often reject autistic children who
make more prosocial approaches
but may not reject those who act
shy.52 Similarly, among autistic
youth, those with attention-deficit/
hyperactivity disorder more
often have an active but odd
interaction style53 and suffer from
peer victimization.54 Highly verbal
autistic adolescents or young adults
with greater teacher-reported social
competence55 and lower self- and
parent-reported autism symptoms
experience more victimization56 and
stigma,
57 in addition to having more
anxiety, depression, and suicidal
ideation.56 Altogether, studies
reveal that students or individuals
with less severe autism may more
frequently suffer from bullying,
perhaps because peers interpret their
by guest on March 8, 2019www.aappublications.org/newsDownloaded from
KAPPS364
behavior as indicating oddness rather
than disability and thus as more
intentional or irresponsible.58
60
(Transition to) Adulthood
Appropriate support rather than
severity of disability plays a
critical role in how the transition
to adulthood impacts functioning.
Autistic young adults with greater
conversational skills more often
lose services after high school in the
United States,
61 whereas those with
intellectual disabilities tend to have
more organized daytime activities.62
This may explain why high school
exits among autistic people without
intellectual disabilities tend to slow
their reduction in autism symptoms63
and add more stress in relationships
with their mothers.64 An autism-
typical pattern of poor adaptive
functioning relative to IQ tends to
rise with greater age and IQ,
65
72
and autistic young adults as a group
tend to have lower employment rates
than their peers with intellectual
disabilities.73 Yet the organizational
and social experience of employment
can improve self-regulation and
interpersonal functioning because
vocational engagement and
independence predict improvements
in activities of daily living and
reductions in autism symptoms and
maladaptive behavior, rather than
vice versa, among autistic adults.74
Similarly, longitudinal research
has revealed that autistic adults
experience declines in vocational
independence over time, whereas
the receipt of services improves
independence in vocational activities,
which are associated with more
independence in other activities of
daily living.75 Adulthood appears
to mark the developmental period
that most challenges the validity of
functioning labels, because some
individuals with higher needs may
function better than others with less
severe autism symptoms and higher
cognitive abilities, as a result of their
support.
SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING
A severe behavioral manifestation
of autism or a high need for support
not only does not preclude a high
quality of life from a subjective
perspective but also usually relates
to higher well-being within the
autism spectrum. Children and adults
with subtler autism symptoms,
76
78
more emotional awareness,
79 closer
friendships,
77 and higher cognitive
abilities77,
78,
80,
81 tend to regard their
autism as more severe and endorse
more anxiety and depression.
This may reflect not only greater
self-awareness but also greater
victimization among individuals with
less obvious disability or supervision
and more distressed reactions to
bullying.54 These individuals may
make greater efforts to conceal
differences amid motivations to fit in
or avoid stigma or bullying, but such
attempts may come at significant
costs.82
85 Moreover, mistreatment,
rather than the self-perceived degree
of autism, may account for distress:
adults reports of quality of life related
to their quality of social support
rather than endorsed autistic traits.86
Indeed, autistic adults rating of
their own quality of life more often
relates to ecological factors such as
bullying, whereas parents (lower)
report of their adult childrens quality
of life relates more often to clinical
factors, such as their skill level.87
Thus, the literature reveals the
importance of autistic individuals
unique perspectives on their own
lives and the need for research on
how to help them from an early
age to holistically understand their
strengths, differences, and needs in an
affirmative way that empowers them
to constructively face their challenges.
TOWARD SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE AND
SELF-ADVOCACY
Autistic peoples challenges in social
communication and subjective well-
being seem to be more a function
of dynamics with other people
than driven by individual deficits.
There is much evidence to support
dissociations between symptoms
and functioning, as well as the
benefits of accepting autism and full
societal inclusion for development
and well-being. Indeed, in this
review, I challenge the validity
and utility of functioning labels
for autism and the interpretation
of the autism spectrum as a
linear continuum. Social support
may mediate functioning, because
individuals with initially lower
skills may experience more benefits
from enriched social environments,
such as parental input for language
growth and cognitive development
from inclusive educational settings.
Furthermore, subtler manifestations
of autism increase individuals
risk of active peer rejection, loss of
formal supports as they transition
into adulthood, and distress. Thus,
in this review, I provide support
for the notion of autism as a cloudy
constellation of uneven skills88 and
high within-person variability,
89
with performance contingent on the
quality of social experiences and
support well-suited for individual
abilities or potential and needs.
Widespread autism acceptance may
help to provide enriched experiences.
The benefits of parental acceptance
of autism for the family summarized
in this review dovetail with evidence
of a positive relationship between
awareness of the neurodiversity
movement and a preference for
referring to oneself as autistic,
an opposition to a cure, and more
positive emotions toward ones
own autism among individuals on
the autism spectrum, alongside
parallel results for nonautistic
people imagining themselves in that
position.7
The authors of future studies
should consider how the complex
relationship between autism and
quality of life depends not only on
social factors but also on the specific
traits or behaviors associated with
by guest on March 8, 2019www.aappublications.org/newsDownloaded from
PEDIATRICS Volume 141, number s4, April 2018 S365
autism, in that they may sometimes
improve individuals functioning
and well-being. Individuals with the
direct lived experience of autism can
best explain the distinction between
normalization and quality of life, such
as how avoiding eye contact90 and
repetitive motor movements91,
92 may
help them to self-regulate, whereas
intense interests can build success
in education and employment.93
95
Many more researchers need to
actively include autistic people
throughout the scientific process
and focus on their priorities, which
often lean strongly toward services
and adulthood96: clearly useful and
underresourced areas. Self-advocates
also prioritize the need for every
autistic person to have functional
communication, and they may have
insights into how to provide effective
support or assistive technology to
realize this goal, so that everyone has
skills and access to clearly express
personal wants and needs.9,
10, 97
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author thanks Alyssa
Delagnes, Amanda Gulsrud, and
Kristen Gillespie-Lynch for their
proofreading and comments on
earlier drafts of this article and
thanks the editors and reviewers for
their constructive comments.
REFERENCES
1. Sameroff A. A unified theory of
development: a dialectic integration
of nature and nurture. Child Dev.
2010;81(1):622
2. Karmiloff-Smith A. Nativism versus
neuroconstructivism: rethinking the
study of developmental disorders. Dev
Psychol. 2009;45(1):5663
3. Smith LB, Thelen E. Development as
a dynamic system. Trends Cogn Sci.
2003;7(8):343348
4. Lewkowicz DJ. The biological
implausibility of the nature-nurture
dichotomy & what it means for
the study of infancy. Infancy.
2011;16(4):331367
5. Rutter M, Moffitt TE, Caspi A.
Gene-environment interplay and
psychopathology: multiple varieties but
real effects. J Child Psychol Psychiatry.
2006;47(34):226261
6. Kenny L, Hattersley C, Molins B, Buckley
C, Povey C, Pellicano E. Which terms
should be used to describe autism?
Perspectives from the UK autism
community. Autism. 2016;20(4):442462
7. Kapp SK, Gillespie-Lynch K, Sherman
LE, Hutman T. Deficit, difference, or
both? Autism and neurodiversity. Dev
Psychol. 2013;49(1):5971
8. Kapp S. Interactions between
theoretical models and practical
stakeholders: the basis for an
integrative, collaborative approach to
disabilities. In: Ashkenazy E, Latimer
M, eds. Empowering Leadership: A
Systems Change Guide for Autistic
College Students and Those With Other
Disabilities. Washington, DC: Autistic
Self Advocacy Network; 2013:104113
9. Neeman A. The future (and the past)
of autism advocacy, or why the ASAs
magazine, The Advocate, wouldnt
publish this piece. Disabil Stud Q.
2010;30(1)
10. Robertson SM. Neurodiversity, quality
of life, and autistic adults: shifting
research and professional focuses
onto real-life challenges. Disabil Stud
Q. 2010;30(1)
11. Green J, Charman T, Pickles A, et al;
BASIS Team. Parent-mediated
intervention versus no intervention
for infants at high risk of autism: a
parallel, single-blind, randomised trial.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2015;2(2):133140
12. Harker CM, Ibañez LV, Nguyen
TP, Messinger DS, Stone WL. The
effect of parenting style on social
smiling in infants at high and low
risk for ASD. J Autism Dev Disord.
2016;46(7):23992407
13. Welch MG, Firestein MR, Austin J,
et al. Family nurture intervention
in the neonatal intensive care unit
improves social-relatedness, attention,
and neurodevelopment of preterm
infants at 18 months in a randomized
controlled trial. J Child Psychol
Psychiatry. 2015;56(11):12021211
14. Bang J, Nadig A. Learning language
in autism: maternal linguistic input
contributes to later vocabulary. Autism
Res. 2015;8(2):214223
15. Dimitrova N, Özçalışkan Ş, Adamson
LB. Parents translations of child
gesture facilitate word learning in
children with autism, Down syndrome
and typical development. J Autism Dev
Disord. 2016;46(1):221231
16. McDuffie A, Yoder P. Types of parent
verbal responsiveness that predict
language in young children with
autism spectrum disorder. J Speech
Lang Hear Res. 2010;53(4):10261039
17. Siller M, Sigman M. Modeling
longitudinal change in the
language abilities of children
with autism: parent behaviors
and child characteristics as
predictors of change. Dev Psychol.
2008;44(6):16911704
18. Haebig E, McDuffie A, Ellis Weismer
S. Brief report: parent verbal
responsiveness and language
development in toddlers on the autism
spectrum. J Autism Dev Disord.
2013;43(9):22182227
19. Haebig E, McDuffie A, Ellis Weismer
S. The contribution of two categories
of parent verbal responsiveness
to later language for toddlers
and preschoolers on the autism
spectrum. Am J Speech Lang Pathol.
2013;22(1):5770
20. Kasari C, Paparella T, Freeman S,
Jahromi LB. Language outcome in
autism: randomized comparison
of joint attention and play
interventions. J Consult Clin Psychol.
2008;76(1):125137
21. Siller M, Hutman T, Sigman M. A parent-
mediated intervention to increase
responsive parental behaviors and
child communication in children with
ASD: a randomized clinical trial. J
Autism Dev Disord. 2013;43(3):540555
22. Naigles LR. Input and language
development in children with
autism. Semin Speech Lang.
2013;34(4):237248
23. Baker JK, Messinger DS, Lyons KK,
Grantz CJ. A pilot study of maternal
sensitivity in the context of emergent
autism. J Autism Dev Disord.
2010;40(8):988999
24. Sandbank M, Yoder P. The
association between parental
by guest on March 8, 2019www.aappublications.org/newsDownloaded from
KAPPS366
mean length of utterance and
language outcomes in children with
disabilities: a correlational meta-
analysis. Am J Speech Lang Pathol.
2016;25(2):240251
25. Bottema-Beutel K. Associations
between joint attention and language
in autism spectrum disorder and
typical development: a systematic
review and meta-regression analysis.
Autism Res. 2016;9(10):10211035
26. Gulsrud AC, Hellemann G, Shire
S, Kasari C. Isolating active
ingredients in a parent-mediated
social communication intervention
for toddlers with autism spectrum
disorder. J Child Psychol Psychiatry.
2016;57(5):606613
27. Shire SY, Goods K, Shih W, et al.
Parents adoption of social com-
munication intervention strategies:
families including children with
autism spectrum disorder who are
minimally verbal. J Autism Dev Disord.
2015;45(6):17121724
28. DiStefano C, Shih W, Kaiser A, Landa
R, Kasari C. Communication growth in
minimally verbal children with ASD: the
importance of interaction. Autism Res.
2016;9(10):10931102
29. Miniscalco C, Rudling M, Råstam
M, Gillberg C, Johnels JÅ. Imitation
(rather than core language) predicts
pragmatic development in young
children with ASD: a preliminary
longitudinal study using CDI parental
reports. Int J Lang Commun Disord.
2014;49(3):369375
30. Stone WL, Yoder PJ. Predicting spoken
language level in children with
autism spectrum disorders. Autism.
2001;5(4):341361
31. Sinclair J. Dont mourn for us.Our
Voice. 1993;1(3):36
32. Hutman T, Siller M, Sigman M. Mothers
narratives regarding their child with
autism predict maternal synchronous
behavior during play. J Child Psychol
Psychiatry. 2009;50(10):12551263
33. Milshtein S, Yirmiya N, Oppenheim D,
Koren-Karie N, Levi S. Resolution of the
diagnosis among parents of children
with autism spectrum disorder:
associations with child and parent
characteristics. J Autism Dev Disord.
2010;40(1):8999
34. Oppenheim D, Koren-Karie N, Dolev
S, Yirmiya N. Maternal insightfulness
and resolution of the diagnosis are
associated with secure attachment
in preschoolers with autism
spectrum disorders. Child Dev.
2009;80(2):519527
35. Wachtel K, Carter AS. Reaction to
diagnosis and parenting styles among
mothers of young children with ASDs.
Autism. 2008;12(5):575594
36. Totsika V, Hastings RP, Emerson
E, Lancaster GA, Berridge DM. A
population-based investigation
of behavioural and emotional
problems and maternal mental
health: associations with autism
spectrum disorder and intellectual
disability. J Child Psychol Psychiatry.
2011;52(1):9199
37. Dolev S, Sher-Censor E, Baransi N,
Amara K, Said M. Resolution of the
childs ASD diagnosis among Arab
Israeli mothers: associations with
maternal sensitivity and wellbeing. Res
Autism Spectr Disord. 2016;21:7383
38. Yirmiya N, Seidman I, Koren-Karie N,
Oppenheim D, Dolev S. Stability and
change in resolution of diagnosis
among parents of children with autism
spectrum disorder: child and parental
contributions. Dev Psychopathol.
2015;27(4, pt 1):10451057
39. Beurkens NM, Hobson JA, Hobson RP.
Autism severity and qualities of parent-
child relations. J Autism Dev Disord.
2013;43(1):168178
40. Oppenheim D, Koren-Karie N, Dolev
S, Yirmiya N. Maternal sensitivity
mediates the link between maternal
insightfulness/resolution and
child-mother attachment: the
case of children with autism
spectrum disorder. Attach Hum Dev.
2012;14(6):567584
41. Nahmias AS, Kase C, Mandell DS.
Comparing cognitive outcomes
among children with autism
spectrum disorders receiving
community-based early intervention
in one of three placements. Autism.
2014;18(3):311320
42. Woodman AC, Smith LE, Greenberg JS,
Mailick MR. Contextual factors predict
patterns of change in functioning
over 10 years among adolescents
and adults with autism spectrum
disorders. J Autism Dev Disord.
2016;46(1):176189
43. Kurth JA, Mastergeorge AM. Academic
and cognitive profiles of students with
autism: implications for classroom
practice and placement. Int J Spec
Educ. 2010;25(2):814
44. Kurth J, Mastergeorge AM. Impact of
setting and instructional context for
adolescents with autism. J Spec Educ.
2012;46(1):3648
45. Kurth J, Mastergeorge AM. Individual
education plan goals and services for
adolescents with autism: impact of age
and educational setting. J Spec Educ.
2010;44(3):146160
46. Dolev S, Oppenheim D, Koren-Karie
N, Yirmiya N. Early attachment and
maternal insightfulness predict
educational placement of children
with autism. Res Autism Spectr Disord.
2014;8(8):958967
47. Chang YC, Shire SY, Shih W, Gelfand
C, Kasari C. Preschool deployment of
evidence-based social communication
intervention: JASPER in the
classroom. J Autism Dev Disord.
2016;46(6):22112223
48. Goods KS, Ishijima E, Chang
YC, Kasari C. Preschool based
JASPER intervention in minimally
verbal children with autism:
pilot RCT. J Autism Dev Disord.
2013;43(5):10501056
49. Mohammadzaheri F, Koegel LK,
Rezaee M, Rafiee SM. A randomized
clinical trial comparison between
pivotal response treatment (PRT) and
structured applied behavior analysis
(ABA) intervention for children
with autism. J Autism Dev Disord.
2014;44(11):27692777
50. Pellecchia M, Connell JE, Beidas
RS, Xie M, Marcus SC, Mandell DS.
Dismantling the active ingredients
of an intervention for children
with autism. J Autism Dev Disord.
2015;45(9):29172927
51. Kapp SK. Including rigorous methods
to improve inclusive education
[comment]. Available at: http://
pediatrics. aappublications. org/
content/ 130/ Supplement_ 2/ S179.
comments#includin g- rigorous-
methods- to- improve- inclusive-
education
by guest on March 8, 2019www.aappublications.org/newsDownloaded from
PEDIATRICS Volume 141, number s4, April 2018 S367
52. Jones AP, Frederickson N. Multi-
informant predictors of social
inclusion for students with autism
spectrum disorders attending
mainstream school. J Autism Dev
Disord. 2010;40(9):10941103
53. Scheeren AM, Koot HM, Begeer S.
Social interaction style of children
and adolescents with high-functioning
autism spectrum disorder. J Autism
Dev Disord. 2012;42(10):20462055
54. Sreckovic MA, Brunsting NC,
Able H. Victimization of students
with autism spectrum disorder:
a review of prevalence and risk
factors. Res Autism Spectr Disord.
2014;8(9):11551172
55. Rowley E, Chandler S, Baird G, et al. The
experience of friendship, victimization
and bullying in children with an autism
spectrum disorder: associations
with child characteristics and school
placement. Res Autism Spectr Disord.
2012;6(3):11261134
56. Shtayermman O. Peer victimization
in adolescents and young adults
diagnosed with Aspergers syndrome:
a link to depressive symptomatology,
anxiety symptomatology and suicidal
ideation. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs.
2007;30(3):87107
57. Shtayermman O. An exploratory
study of the stigma associated
with a diagnosis of Aspergers
syndrome: the mental health impact
on the adolescents and young adults
diagnosed with a disability with
a social nature. J Hum Behav Soc
Environ. 2009;19(3):298313
58. Feldman DB, Crandall CS. Dimensions
of mental illness stigma: what about
mental illness causes social rejection?
J Soc Clin Psychol. 2007;26(2):137154
59. Hinshaw SP, Stier A. Stigma as related
to mental disorders. Annu Rev Clin
Psychol. 2008;4:367393
60. Weiner B. On sin versus sickness.
A theory of perceived responsibility
and social motivation. Am Psychol.
1993;48(9):957965
61. Shattuck PT, Wagner M, Narendorf
S, Sterzing P, Hensley M. Post-high
school service use among young
adults with an autism spectrum
disorder. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.
2011;165(2):141146
62. Taylor JL, Seltzer MM. Employment and
post-secondary educational activities
for young adults with autism spectrum
disorders during the transition to
adulthood. J Autism Dev Disord.
2011;41(5):566574
63. Taylor JL, Seltzer MM. Changes in the
autism behavioral phenotype during
the transition to adulthood. J Autism
Dev Disord. 2010;40(12):14311446
64. Taylor JL, Seltzer MM. Changes in the
mother-child relationship during the
transition to adulthood for youth with
autism spectrum disorders. J Autism
Dev Disord. 2011;41(10):13971410
65. Balfe M, Tantam D. A descriptive social
and health profile of a community
sample of adults and adolescents with
Asperger syndrome. BMC Res Notes.
2010;3:300
66. Kanne SM, Gerber AJ, Quirmbach LM,
Sparrow SS, Cicchetti DV, Saulnier CA.
The role of adaptive behavior in autism
spectrum disorders: implications
for functional outcome. J Autism Dev
Disord. 2011;41(8):10071018
67. Klin A, Saulnier CA, Sparrow SS,
Cicchetti DV, Volkmar FR, Lord C.
Social and communication abilities
and disabilities in higher functioning
individuals with autism spectrum
disorders: the Vineland and the ADOS.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2007;37(4):748759
68. Lee HJ, Park HR. An integrated
literature review on the adaptive
behavior of individuals with Asperger
syndrome. Remedial Spec Educ.
2007;28(3):132139
69. Levy A, Perry A. Outcomes in
adolescents and adults with autism:
a review of the literature. Res Autism
Spectr Disord. 2011;5(4):12711282
70. Myles BS, Lee HJ, Smith SM, et al. A
large-scale study of the characteristics
of Asperger syndrome. Educ Train Dev
Disabil. 2007;42(4):448459
71. Saulnier CA, Klin A. Brief report:
social and communication abilities
and disabilities in higher functioning
individuals with autism and Asperger
syndrome. J Autism Dev Disord.
2007;37(4):788793
72. Volker MA, Lopata C, Smerbeck AM, et al.
BASC-2 PRS profiles for students with
high-functioning autism spectrum
disorders. J Autism Dev Disord.
2010;40(2):188199
73. Shattuck PT, Narendorf SC, Cooper
B, Sterzing PR, Wagner M, Taylor
JL. Postsecondary education and
employment among youth with an
autism spectrum disorder. Pediatrics.
2012;129(6):10421049
74. Taylor JL, Smith LE, Mailick MR.
Engagement in vocational activities
promotes behavioral development
for adults with autism spectrum
disorders. J Autism Dev Disord.
2014;44(6):14471460
75. Taylor JL, Mailick MR. A longitudinal
examination of 10-year change
in vocational and educational
activities for adults with autism
spectrum disorders. Dev Psychol.
2014;50(3):699708
76. Lai MC, Lombardo MV, Pasco G, et al;
MRC AIMS Consortium. A behavioral
comparison of male and female adults
with high functioning autism spectrum
conditions. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20835
77. Mazurek MO, Kanne SM. Friendship
and internalizing symptoms
among children and adolescents
with ASD. J Autism Dev Disord.
2010;40(12):15121520
78. Sterling L, Dawson G, Estes A, Greenson
J. Characteristics associated with
presence of depressive symptoms
in adults with autism spectrum
disorder. J Autism Dev Disord.
2008;38(6):10111018
79. Capps L, Sigman M, Yirmiya N.
Self-competence and emotional
understanding in high-functioning
children with autism. Dev
Psychopathol. 1995;7(1):137149
80. Bishop SL, Seltzer MM. Self-reported
autism symptoms in adults with
autism spectrum disorders.
J Autism Dev Disord.
2012;42(11):23542363
81. Vickerstaff S, Heriot S, Wong M, Lopes
A, Dossetor D. Intellectual ability,
self-perceived social competence,
and depressive symptomatology in
children with high-functioning autistic
spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev
Disord. 2007;37(9):16471664
82. Baines AMD. Positioning, strategizing,
and charming: how students with
autism construct identities in
relation to disability. Disabil Soc.
2012;27(4):547561
by guest on March 8, 2019www.aappublications.org/newsDownloaded from
KAPPS368
83. Davidson J, Henderson VL. Coming
out on the spectrum: autism, identity
and disclosure. Soc Cult Geogr.
2010;11(2):155170
84. Jones RS, Meldal TO. Social relationships
and Aspergers syndrome: a qualitative
analysis of first-hand accounts. J Intellect
Disabil. 2001;5(1):3541
85. Pachankis JE. The psychological
implications of concealing a stigma: a
cognitive-affective-behavioral model.
Psychol Bull. 2007;133(2):328345
86. Renty JO, Roeyers H. Quality of life
in high-functioning adults with
autism spectrum disorder: the
predictive value of disability and
support characteristics. Autism.
2006;10(5):511524
87. Hong J, Bishop-Fitzpatrick L, Smith
LE, Greenberg JS, Mailick MR. Factors
associated with subjective quality of
life of adults with autism spectrum
disorder: self-report versus maternal
reports. J Autism Dev Disord.
2016;46(4):13681378
88. Jones CR, Happé F, Golden H, et al.
Reading and arithmetic in adolescents
with autism spectrum disorders:
peaks and dips in attainment.
Neuropsychology. 2009;23(6):
718728
89. Geurts HM, Grasman RP, Verté S,
et al. Intra-individual variability
in ADHD, autism spectrum
disorders and Tourettes
syndrome. Neuropsychologia.
2008;46(13):30303041
90. Gernsbacher MA, Frymiare JL. Does the
autistic brain lack core modules? J Dev
Learn Disord. 2005;9:316
91. Davidson J. It cuts both ways: a
relational approach to access and
accommodation for autism. Soc Sci
Med. 2010;70(2):305312
92. Yergeau M. Occupying autism: rhetoric,
involuntarity, and the meaning of
autistic lives. In: Block P, Kasnitz D,
Nishida A, Pollard N, eds. Occupying
Disability: Critical Approaches to
Community, Justice, and Decolonizing
Disability. Dordrecht, Netherlands:
Springer; 2016:8395
93. Grandin T, ed. DifferentNot Less:
Inspiring Stories of Achievement and
Successful Employment From Adults
With Autism, Aspergers, and ADHD.
Arlington, TX: Future Horizons; 2012
94. Perner L, ed. Scholars With Autism
Achieving Dreams. Sedona, AZ: Auricle
Books; 2012
95. Santomauro J, ed. Autism All-Stars:
How We Use Our Autism and Asperger
Traits to Shine in Life. Philadelphia, PA:
Jessica Kingsley; 2012
96. Pellicano E, Dinsmore A, Charman T.
What should autism research focus
upon? Community views and priorities
from the United Kingdom. Autism.
2014;18(7):756770
97. Kasari C, Kaiser A, Goods K, et al.
Communication interventions for
minimally verbal children with autism:
a sequential multiple assignment
randomized trial. J Am Acad Child
Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;53(6):635646
by guest on March 8, 2019www.aappublications.org/newsDownloaded from
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-4300N
2018;141;S362Pediatrics
Steven K. Kapp
Autism Spectrum
Social Support, Well-being, and Quality of Life Among Individuals on the
Services
Updated Information & http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/141/Supplement_4/S362
including high resolution figures, can be found at:
References
#BIBL
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/141/Supplement_4/S362
This article cites 89 articles, 1 of which you can access for free at:
Permissions & Licensing
http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/Permissions.xhtml
in its entirety can be found online at:
Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures, tables) or
Reprints http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml
Information about ordering reprints can be found online:
by guest on March 8, 2019www.aappublications.org/newsDownloaded from
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-4300N
2018;141;S362Pediatrics
Steven K. Kapp
Autism Spectrum
Social Support, Well-being, and Quality of Life Among Individuals on the
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/141/Supplement_4/S362
located on the World Wide Web at:
The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is
1073-0397. ISSN:60007. Copyright © 2018 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print
the American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois,
has been published continuously since 1948. Pediatrics is owned, published, and trademarked by
Pediatrics is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly publication, it
by guest on March 8, 2019www.aappublications.org/newsDownloaded from
... Regarding Social Interactions, the need to Adapt to AEs can highlight difficulties in navigating neuronormative social situations over time, making social occasions or public spaces stressful and increasing social avoidance. Cognitive Flexibility is also impacted by the need to Adapt to AEs, leading to heightened rigidity and discomfort with dealing with change within an environment over time 8,13,19,31,84,91 . Previous literature shows that hostile sensory environments can negatively affect non-social Autistic traits such as Cognitive Flexibility, Self-Regulating Repetitive Behaviors and Sensory Sensitivity (including other sensory modalities) [92][93][94][95][96] . ...
Article
Full-text available
Autistic people often report a heightened sensitivity to sound. Yet, research into Autistic people’s auditory environments and their impacts on quality of life is limited. We conducted an online survey to understand how auditory environments influence the relationships between Autistic traits and impacts on quality of life (iQoL) due to sound sensitivity. We also sought to determine strategies that Autistic people use to navigate auditory sensitivities in daily life. 296 Autistic adults (58.4% women, 15.9% men, 24.3% non-binary +) aged 18–71 years completed the survey comprising a questionnaire with bespoke items measuring auditory experiences in different environments (e.g., noisy vs. quiet) and measures of Autistic traits and iQoL. Our path analyses revealed a significant indirect effect of aversive auditory environments on the relationships between all domains of Autistic traits and iQoL. Notably, the association between non-verbal social communication trait and iQoL was fully mediated by all forms of auditory environments. Additionally, most (n = 217, 73.5%) Autistic participants reported using earplugs and headphones to manage their sound environments in everyday life. Our study demonstrates that many aspects of auditory environments—beyond noise alone―can negatively impact Autistic people’s QoL. Addressing barriers created by auditory environments through accommodations should improve QoL for Autistic people.
... The efforts of the family members to know their child more in such cases created fertile ground for seeding the overall manifestation of the child's fullest potential as also pointed out by earlier researchers (e.g. Kapp, 2018;Shire et al., 2015), hence evidencing rewarding outcomes despite the challenges of autistic people (Deweerdt, 2017;Sarris, 2019). ...
... Adams et al. 2020;Leedham et al. 2020;Hanvey et al. 2022). Adapting to everyday life and learning to cope in a neurotypical world can be difficult for some autistic people, especially when in social situations and transitioning into adulthood (Kapp 2018). Leekam (2016 p2) highlights that autistic individuals can display atypical social behaviour, which they suggest could attribute itself to 'theory of mind' deficits, especially within rapidly changing social situations. ...
Article
Full-text available
Autistic individuals can struggle with aspects of social interaction, communication and maintaining relationships. Despite this, autistic people are often successful in long-term romantic relationships and can bring qualities others may not. Often, these relationships are with Neurotypical (NT) individuals. This can present challenges in communication, as both partners may feel their needs are not heard or validated and they may misunderstand the needs and wishes of the other partner. Existing research around ‘mixed’ autistic and NT couples is scarce and, when conducted, results have focused predominantly on the challenges faced in the relationship. Thus, data collected in this study are valuable to offer an alternative view, progressing away from deficit-based views of mixed relationships and recognizing strengths and challenges equally. This research takes a qualitative approach, utilising Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA), and analyses data from six NT participants. Semi-structured interviews took place online with all participants. Three themes were developed, ‘All or Nothing: The Impact of Black and White Thinking’, ‘Being able to understand autism helps us develop’ and ‘For me, autism doesn’t define us’. Participants had mostly positive experiences with their partners and were happy in their relationships. This research identified that autism does not define a relationship, black and white thinking can be both a strength and a challenge for NT partners and understanding autism greatly benefits the relationship and communication between partners.
... Social support has been reported to offer relief from difficult experiences and enable people to cope with stressful events (Guardario et al., 2024;Drageset, 2021;Owusu-Ansah & Nkrumah, 2017). Although social support is important for people with and without disabilities, it may be the most important determinant of the well-being and QoL (QoL) of persons with disabilities (PWDs), and chronic or terminal ailments (Kapp, 2018;Schippers & Van Hove, 2017). Adigun et al. (2022) reported that social support improves self-esteem, facilitates positive behaviour adjustment, and enhances the health outcomes of children with disabilities. ...
Article
Full-text available
Everyone may need some form of support at a point in time. Support networks assist when there are threatening life events. Whereas everyone needs support, persons who are vulnerable in society such as persons with disabilities (PWDs) may need it the most, hence, this study investigated the influence of social support on their quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to determine the impact of social support on the QoL of PWDs. The study sought to find the sources of social support, the relationship between social support and QoL, and the mechanism by which social support influences the QoL of PWDs. The study was mixed-method with an explanatory sequential design. The population of the study was PWDs in the Tamale Metropolis and Sagnarigu Municipality. A total of 117 PWDs participated in the study using stratified random sampling. A questionnaire and a semi-structured interview guide were the main instruments. The researchers administered the instruments personally. The quantitative data was analysed using simple linear regression, and One-way ANOVA while the qualitative data was analysed using thematic analysis. It was found that social support was a predictor of the QoL of PWDs especially, support from significant others and families but not from friends. Also, there was a significant difference in QoL among PWDs especially between the hearing impaired and the physically disabled. It was found that the support they received improved their health, well-being, and QoL. It was concluded that social support enhances the QoL of PWDs, hence, the need to strengthen social support systems for them.
Article
Full-text available
While the autism diagnosis emphasizes “deficits” in social communication, the article advances that sensory–movement differences underpin autism through a review of the following sources of evidence. This account critically challenges “autistic regression”, with evidence that sensory–movement features appear by birth as the earliest signs of autism and underlie the behavioral differences used for diagnosis, which may reflect adaptations to inherent differences and misunderstandings from others. Sensory and motor differences are salient to autistic people, but they often go underrecognized by others. They cause cascading effects in infancy on behavior and communication through differences in sensorimotor learning, automatic imitation, eye contact, sensory perception, and interests. The article then explains how sensory processing differences may influence reduced perceptual narrowing, which involves a bottom-up information processing style grounded in the surrounding environment. Furthermore, this bottom-up processing may grow from reduced sensory integration in feedback loops potentially involving the cerebellum of the brain. The article then moves into implications for the widespread consequences of these inherent differences on quality of life. The article closes with implications for autism as a construct (including underestimated empathy and pain), testing the theory, providing sensory-sensitive support and acceptance of autistic people, and applications to diverse autistic people. The theory may apply particularly well to autistic women and girls, autistic people with speech divergence, autistic people with ADHD, and autistic people with co-occurring sensory and motor-related neurodivergences. Throughout the article, the theory also provides clinical, neurological, and experiential evidence for sensory and motor differences as lifelong, challenging the notion of “losing” (an) autism (diagnosis) as instead reflecting (risky and not necessarily “successful”) camouflaging.
Article
Full-text available
Autism diagnostic criteria relate to difficulties in functioning across multiple developmental domains, that often impact on a person’s independence. There are different ways to conceptualise and exercise independence, but no previous studies have questioned how autistic adults do so. This qualitative study aimed to understand how autistic adults define and experience independence. It was designed to further our understanding of how autistic adults account for and use coping strategies to overcome barriers to independent living and navigate their way to their desired level of independence. Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with autistic adults living in the United Kingdom. The data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. The researchers generated three major themes. The first theme ‘Independence is “not a one-size-fits-all”’ highlights that there is no one definition or concept of independence for autistic people; these are relative and uniquely individual. The second theme ‘“Being autistic has its setbacks” in a neurotypical world’ describes the obstacles encountered by autistic adults seeking independence within a society that favours neurotypical norms. The third theme ‘Finding ways of making it work’ captures strategies autistic adults use in achieving or maintaining independence. The findings from this study provide a foundation for future research exploring domains of independence for autistic adults. The perceived desirability of achieving different degrees of in(ter)dependence and the fluctuating nature of self-sufficiency are explored through lived experience. Increasing understanding of barriers and challenges to independence has the potential to empower autistic adults and improve services and support.
Article
In the 1940s, the child welfare and mental hygiene movements merged, leading to the emergence of the category of autism, as childhood became a focus of psychiatric surveillance. This resulted in stigma placed on parents through psychoanalytic explanations attributing autism to an inappropriate upbringing. A social movement by parents emerged as a response to challenge this medical perspective, coinciding with the deinstitutionalization and community transition trend of the mid-1970s, expanding the authority of therapists rather than physicians. The redefinition of autism was made possible through collaborative efforts between parents and therapists. Against the backdrop of mid-20th-century norms in middle-class child rearing, the concept of Asperger`s syndrome spread with heightened sensitivity to minor deviations or delays. Parent groups seeking support for autistic individuals without intellectual or language impairments, and their families engaged with autism researchers, who were also parents, to influence academia, leading to conceptual expansion and geneticization. These actions provided legitimacy to parents advocating for children with language impairments within the same genetic community. The broadening of the diagnostic criteria inevitably gave rise to a group of autistic self-advocates who could assert themselves without linguistic impairments. In the early 1990s, a neurodiversity movement emerged, aiming to depathologize autism and promote inclusive societal realization, in contrast to the medical model-focused parent groups. This movement expanded in various directions and, like previous parent groups, sought to influence academia' s authority over defining “what is autism.” While many activists agree with the medical definition describing the core features of autism, some challenge the current autism concept because it is considering social communication difficulties as individual traits. Empirically grounded studies supporting these trends are also emerging. Sociology, which has studied the normativity of social communication, can potentially align with the neurodiversity movement by describing micro-level communication styles and macro-level social orders that have been customized for neurotypicals and exclude autistics.
Article
Compared to their nonautistic peers, lower levels of life satisfaction have been reported by autistic individuals. It is unclear, however, whether autistic individuals with intellectual disability report similar levels of life satisfaction as autistic individuals without intellectual disability or which characteristics are associated with life satisfaction. This study sought to examine differences in levels of self-reported life satisfaction across those with and without intellectual disability and explore correlates of life satisfaction in a sample of 35 autistic youth with intellectual disability and 99 autistic youth without intellectual disability. No difference in self-reported life satisfaction was detected between autistic youth with and without intellectual disability. Greater self-reported life satisfaction was associated with higher self-determination for autistic youth without intellectual disability. For autistic youth with intellectual disability, greater self-reported life satisfaction was related to more frequent social participation, lower parent stress, and fewer unmet service needs. Unmet service needs and parent stress were significantly stronger correlates of life satisfaction for youth with intellectual disability compared to youth without intellectual disability. Although the sample size of autistic youth with intellectual disability was small, these findings suggest the importance of considering heterogeneity among individuals on the autism spectrum when seeking to understand their well-being. Lay abstract Autistic people report lower life satisfaction compared to people without autism. It is unclear whether autistic people with intellectual disability report similar levels of life satisfaction to autistic people without intellectual disability. In this study, we did not find a difference in levels of life satisfaction for autistic youth with intellectual disability compared to autistic youth without intellectual disability. We also identified factors that might promote better life satisfaction. Higher self-determination was related to higher life satisfaction for autistic youth without intellectual disability. For autistic youth with intellectual disability, more frequent social participation, lower parent stress, and fewer unmet service needs were associated with higher life satisfaction. Unmet service needs and parent stress were more strongly related to life satisfaction for youth with intellectual disability compared to youth without intellectual disability. Our findings suggest that taking a more individualized approach to support the well-being of autistic youth is important.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose The purpose of this correlational meta-analysis was to examine the association between parental utterance length and language outcomes in children with disabilities and whether this association varies according to other child characteristics, such as age and disability type. This association can serve as a starting point for language intervention practices for children with disabilities. Method We conducted a systematic search of 42 electronic databases to identify relevant studies. Twelve studies reporting on a total of 13 populations (including 257 participants) were identified. A random-effects model was used to estimate a combined effect size across all studies as well as separate effect sizes across studies in each disability category. Results The combined effect size across all studies suggests a weak positive association between parental input length and child language outcomes. However, subgroup analyses within disability categories suggest that this association may differ for children with autism. Results of 4 studies including 47 children with autism show that parental input length is strongly associated with positive language outcomes in this population. Conclusions Present evidence suggests that clinicians should reconsider intervention practices that prescribe shorter, grammatically incomplete utterances, particularly when working with children with autism.
Article
Full-text available
This study examined how parenting style at 9 months predicts growth in infant social engagement (i.e., social smiling) between 9 and 18 months during a free-play interaction in infants at high (HR-infants) and low (LR-infants) familial risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Results indicated that across all infants, higher levels of maternal responsiveness were concurrently associated with higher levels of social smiling, while higher levels of maternal directiveness predicted slower growth in social smiling. When accounting for maternal directiveness, which was higher in mothers of HR-infants, HR-infants exhibited greater growth in social smiling than LR-infants. Overall, each parenting style appears to make a unique contribution to the development of social engagement in infants at high- and low-risk for ASD.
Article
Full-text available
Few research-developed early intervention models have been deployed to and tested in real world preschool programs. In this study, teaching staff implemented a social communication modularized intervention, JASPER, in their daily program. Sixty-six preschool children with autism in twelve classrooms (12 teachers) were randomized to receive immediate JASPER training (IT) or were waitlisted (WL) for 3 months with a 1-month follow up. Measures of core deficits (initiations of joint engagement, joint attention gestures and language, play skills) and standardized cognitive measures were improved for IT over WL children. IT teachers achieved and maintained high fidelity. Teachers can implement evidence-based interventions with significant improvements in core deficits of their children with ASD.
Article
Full-text available
Little is known about language development in children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) who remain minimally verbal past age 5. While there is evidence that children can develop language after age 5, we lack detailed information. Studies of this population generally focus on discrete language skills without addressing broader social-communication abilities. As communication and social deficits are both inherent to ASD, an examination of not only what language skills are acquired, but how those skills are used in interactions is relevant. Research in typical development has examined how communication interchanges (unbroken back-and-forth exchanges around a unified purpose) develop, which can be used as a framework for studying minimally verbal children. This study examined the interchange use by 55 children with ASD over the course of a 6-month play and engagement-based communication intervention. Half of the children received intervention sessions that also incorporated a speech-generating device (SGD). Interchanges were coded by: frequency, length, function, and initiator (child or adult). Results indicated that children initiated a large proportion of interchanges and this proportion increased over time. The average length and number of interchanges increased over time, with children in the SGD group showing even greater growth. Finally, children's total number of interchanges at baseline was positively associated with their spoken language gains over the course of intervention. This study supports the crucial relationship between social engagement and expressive language development, and highlights the need to include sustained communication interchanges as a target for intervention with this population. Autism Res 2016. © 2016 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Article
Full-text available
We examined factors related to subjective quality of life (QoL) of adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) aged 25-55 (n = 60), using the World Health Organization Quality of Life measure (WHOQOL-BREF). We used three different assessment methods: adult self-report, maternal proxy-report, and maternal report. Reliability analysis showed that adults with ASD rated their own QoL reliably. QoL scores derived from adult self-reports were more closely related to those from maternal proxy-report than from maternal report. Subjective factors such as perceived stress and having been bullied frequently were associated with QoL based on adult self-reports. In contrast, level of independence in daily activities and physical health were significant predictors of maternal reports of their son or daughter's QoL.
Article
Using a structured literature search and meta-regression procedures, this study sought to determine whether associations between joint attention and language are moderated by group (autism spectrum disorder [ASD] vs. typical development [TD]), joint attention type (responding to joint attention [RJA] vs. other), and other study design features and participant characteristics. Studies were located using database searches, hand searches, and electronic requests for data from experts in the field. This resulted in 71 reports or datasets and 605 effect sizes, representing 1,859 participants with ASD and 1,835 TD participants. Meta-regression was used to answer research questions regarding potential moderators of the effect sizes of interest, which were Pearson's r values quantifying the association between joint attention and language variables. In the final models, conducted separately for each language variable, effect sizes were significantly higher for the ASD group as compared to the TD group, and for RJA as compared to non-RJA joint attention types. Approximate mental age trended toward significance for the expressive language model. Joint attention may be more tightly tied to language in children with ASD as compared to TD children because TD children exhibit joint attention at sufficient thresholds so that language development becomes untethered to variations in joint attention. Conversely, children with ASD who exhibit deficits in joint attention develop language contingent upon their joint attention abilities. Because RJA was more strongly related to language than other types of joint attention, future research should involve careful consideration of the operationalization and measurement of joint attention constructs. Autism Res 2016. © 2016 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Article
p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"> This article examines challenges to the quality of life experienced by autistic adults. The author, who is an autistic researcher, first shares how a neurodiversity perspective offers an important alternative to the deficit model of autism. Whereas the deficit model portrays autistic people as ill, broken, and in need of fixing, the neurodiversity perspective portrays it as a form of human diversity with associated strengths and difficulties. The article’s discussion then shifts to presenting Schalock’s (2000) quality of life framework as a neurodiversity-compatible lens through which domains of quality of life can be viewed. The article analyzes in detail these core domains in relation to the lives of autistic adults. The author suggests that a collaborative approach between professionals/researchers and autistic adults is needed to develop meaningful solutions to these challenges, and he presents possibilities for collaboration. Keywords Autism, Neurodiversity, Quality of life, Autistic Adults </span
Chapter
Autistic people are hardly described as having the capability to form their own community(s). This obsession with our incapability transcends scholarly discipline—it is routinely portrayed as an inseparable part of autism as a condition. Across scholarly and popular domains, autistic people are portrayed as egocentric, mindblind, and asocial. Using autie-ethnographic analysis, I argue that scholars and lay publics alike represent autism as an involuntary condition. What autistic people consider rhetorical moves—e.g., ticcing, stimming, perseverating—medical practitioners consider involuntary or aberrant behaviors. In this construction, autism represents arhetorical symptoms of a problemed body rather than a valid and underrepresented form of communication.
Article
This study focused on Arab-Israeli mothers of children with ASD, and examined maternal resolution of the child's diagnosis, and its associations with mothers' sensitivity to the child, maternal psychological distress, parenting stress, social support, and family demographics. Forty-six mothers and their 2-8 year old sons participated in the study. Mothers were interviewed regarding their resolution of their child's diagnosis, their child's ASD symptoms and adaptive behaviors, and completed questionnaires to assess their psychological distress, parenting stress and social support. Maternal sensitivity was observed during two mother-child play contexts, didactic and social play. Resolved mothers were more sensitive to their child during social play, and reported less psychological distress and parenting stress, as well as fewer child ASD symptoms compared with unresolved mothers. Implications for cultural sensitive parental guidance for families of children with ASD are discussed.