Technical ReportPDF Available

Mobile Pastoralism in the Mediterranean: Arguments and evidence for policy reform and to combat climate change.


Abstract and Figures

In spite of negative perceptions, mobile pastoralism is a highly sustainable production system with clear environmental, social and economic benefits. This document makes the case for mobile pastoralism – a beneficial practice that is seriously threatened today, not just in the Mediterranean, but all over the world - through the revision of more than 100 scientific references.
No caption available
No caption available
No caption available
No caption available
No caption available
Content may be subject to copyright.
Mobile pastoralism in the Mediterranean:
Arguments and evidence for policy reform and its
role in combating climate change
February 2018
© Gema Arrugaeta
Pablo Manzano-Baena
Concha Salguero-Herrera
Liza Zogib
Divya Venkatesh
MedINA, Sana Mzoughi, Shalimar Sinno, Sandra
Spissinger-Bang, Engin Ylmaz, Liza Zogib
Supported By
CAP – European Common Agriculture Policy
CLAs – Conjugated Linoleic Acids
EFNCP – European Forum for Nature Conservation
and Pastoralism
EU – European Union
FAO – Food and Agriculture Organisation of the
United Nations
GHG – Greenhouse Gas
IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
IUCN – International Union for the Conservation
of Nature
OIE – World Organisation for Animal Health
PU FAs – Polyinsaturated Fatty Acids
UNEA – United Nations Environmental Assembly
Photo Credit: Spanish
pastoralist with Pramenka
ock in Eastern Herzegovina.
© Pablo Manzano
Photo Credit: We belong
to dierent generations,
dierent lifestyles, but we are
and always will be, nomads.
© Younes Tazi, Morocco,
Combating Land Degradation
Food security & food safety
Eciency in food production
Improvement in food quality
Other social issues
Pastoralism, religion and spirituality
Executive Summary
Mobile pastoralism1 is one of the most ecient livestock farming systems
in terms of natural resource use and land management. It is also a highly
sustainable and economically rational system that makes the most of the Earth’s
less productive areas, unsuitable for crop production.
e environmental benets of mobile pastoralism are many and these have been
tried and tested on the ground for millennia. In recent decades research on
ecology, economics, nutrition and sociology has revealed many of these benets,
highlighting the role that this traditional practice can full in the present day as
a tool for ‘retroinnovation’ in the ght to tackle climate change and contribute
to its mitigation and adaption, respond to social challenges and promote resilient
In a highly biodiverse region such as the Mediterranean, mobile pastoralism
not only provides ecosystem functions associated with grazing that maintain
biodiversity, but also contributes to ecosystem adaptation for climate change.
e drover roads maintained by livestock mobility are ecological corridors that
favour seed dispersal and connect valuable habitats, so avoiding isolation and
fragmentation, which are amongst the most serious threats to areas of high
biodiversity. ey also increase botanical diversity and habitat heterogeneity
without which other species could not survive.
Mobile pastoralism is also one of the most cost eective methods of preventing
wildres since grazing relies on natural rangelands, consuming the biomass,
which if le untouched forms the fuel for res. Livestock grazing it is also an
eective tool for soil stability, restoration and resilience as it adds manure to the
nutrient cycle and restores vegetation cover as mobile herds allow pastures to
rest and trees to regenerate. Most importantly in the Mediterranean, livestock
mobility has direct benets for water cycle regulation as it helps reduce pressure
on water resources, consuming water on the move where it is available.
Pastures are one of the largest carbon sinks on the planet, therefore mobile
pastoralism must be used as a critical tool in the ght against climate change as it
maintains carbon-rich soils and sustains ecosystems with high carbon xation
It is also the livestock production system that requires the least fossil fuel energy,
helping in turn to reduce the demand of industrial feed whose production and
transport produce large GHG emissions. It additionally reduces the incidence of
pollution, the reliance on veterinary products (among them antibiotics) and so
produces healthier food, from livestock reared in the open air, which are t and
more resistant to disease.
1 Mobile pastoralism is a catch-all term that encompasses transhumance, semi-nomadic and nomadic pasto-
ralism, and some practices of extensive grazing, where people and their livestock move on foot through the landscape
in search of pasture and water.
Photo Credit: Raza Merina
Negra. © Familia Cabello
Bravo, Siruela (Badajoz)
8Executive Summary
e capacity to adapt to climate change challenges
is probably the most distinctive feature of pastoralist
communities who rely on local breeds, mobility
and communal land tenure, making it
resilient, ductile and adaptable to changing
climatic conditions.
Based on all these reasons, new research shows that
the policy recommendations to reduce extensive
livestock to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions will
be counterproductive.
Economic benets are also increasingly recognized.
To begin with, mobile pastoralism makes the most
of available resources in areas considered “marginal”
from a purely agricultural production point of view,
but these areas can be rich for the provision of other
ecosystem services. Additionally, pastoral products
can easily meet the rising market demands for
sustainable and healthy food that supports social
and cultural values and is produced in natural
environments and diversied cultural landscapes.
is is crucial to ght depopulation in rural areas
and build a strong and resilient rural economy, by
creating sustainable direct and indirect jobs and
stimulating peripheral economies, such as dierent
types of rural tourism and other complementary
ese economic benets also have social
implications, as they can contribute to helping
traditionally marginalized groups (e.g. women) to
get a job or become entrepreneurs, and to alleviate
the out-migration of young people to urban areas
due to the lack of job opportunities. e advantages
of 21st Century technology can make pastoralist
businesses easier and rural areas can become an
attractive option for new populations looking for
healthier and happier ways of living.
e cultural aspect (see Annex) of mobile
pastoralism is fundamental in understanding
resilience strategies, adaptation capacities and
the legacy that allows it to operate under modern
conditions. Examples from Spain, Greece, Turkey,
Lebanon or Tunisia show how pastoralist cultural
traits are ancient yet useful and important for the
adaptation of extensive livestock production, and
also a very important part of Mediterranean culture.
In spite of the clear benets provided, mobile
pastoralism is sometimes perceived as an
unsustainable farming system due to poor
understanding of its role in human wellbeing,
resulting in undermining policies that have created
hurdles to its sustainability. is, in turn, results in
widespread environmental deterioration and the
aggravation of wrong perceptions.
Decisive and urgent policy action is therefore
needed in terms of understanding, recognizing and
supporting mobile pastoralism. Policy should focus
on producing specic regulations for these extensive
farming systems (separated from industrial and
intensive farming system regulations), and helping
to improve key issues such as production of safe
and high-quality foods, sanitary regulations, use of
protection dogs, available data and statistics, and
improving the state and status of traditional pastoral
routes and existing drover roads.
To attain these objectives a change in the current
agricultural policy approach is fundamental (e.g.
in the new EU Common Agricultural Policy). e
integration of environmental and social principles
must be real in order to shi agriculture policy
focus from supporting nature degrading, intensive
production systems to those that provide a high level
of public services and improve human wellbeing, as
is the case for mobile pastoralism.
is document makes the case for mobile
pastoralism – a benecial practice that is seriously
threatened today, not just in the Mediterranean, but
all over the world.
Photo Credit: Spanish
pastoralist with Pramenka
ock in Eastern Herzegovina.
© Pablo Manzano
10 Breadcrumb
Mobile pastoralism is the most ecient livestock farming system in terms
of use of forage resources, water and energy, and one of the most sustainable
food systems on the planet. e herds move to pastures according to seasonal
availability and this has traditionally characterized grazing in the Mediterranean
Basin – one of the main biodiversity hot spots on Earth, partly due to these
ancestral mobile pastoralist practices. Although herbaceous pastures do exist
in the Mediterranean region, shrub or wood pastures are predominant, having
additional qualities in terms of both forage provision (particularly important in
dry conditions) and high nature values2. Mobile pastoralism’s contribution to
rural economy, society and biodiversity is also outstanding, integrating the three
dimensions of sustainable development (economic, social and environmental).
Mobile pastoralism is thus a crucial element in the achievement of the
Sustainable Development Goals and it is a paradigmatic example of what FAO
denes as “climate-smart agriculture”3.
Increased global environmental awareness, particularly in the framework of
global climate change, has put a focus on livestock production. Greenhouse gas
(GHG) emissions, land degradation or deforestation and biodiversity loss are
impacts attributed to livestock4, where extensive practices carry much of the
burden (cf. Climate Change Mitigation section of this document). However,
sustainable extensive livestock production is linked to traditional practices5 and
to cultural landscapes6, both elements being the backbone of Mediterranean
mobile pastoralism. e understanding of sustainability has also been widened
in past decades, comprising not only environmental but also economic and
social aspects.
Pastoralism is an economic activity that can be dened as a livestock production
system that maximizes exibility in order to thrive upon unpredictable
resources, through livestock mobility and communal land management. It is a
very logical although complex production system that merges environmental,
social and economic rules, and has therefore been subject to repeated
misunderstandings by analysts and policymakers. It is easy to fall into the trap of
using terminologies or understandings that undermine its value7.
In the current climate change scenario, mobile pastoralism fullls a crucial role
as a tool for ‘retroinnovation’, or innovation through traditional practices, in
both adaptation and mitigation and it can also contribute to tackle other major
challenges which modern society currently confronts: the economic crisis, the
need for participatory governance, and social stability.
e main objective of this document is thus to elaborate solid arguments as a
basis for advocating and lobbying in favour of public policy support to mobile
pastoralism both at Mediterranean and international level.
2 EFNCP 2015a
4 Herrero et al 2012, Herrero et a l 2016
5 Eisler et al 2014
6 Plieninger et al 2014
7 Krätli et al 2015
Photo Credit: Natural Park
Hoces del Alto Ebro y
Rudrn (Burgos, Spain).
© Concha Salguero
12 Introduction
e Millenium Ecosystem Assessment9 categories provide a framework to summarize the public goods
and ecosystem services stated in this document that are provided by mobile pastoralism:
Provisioning: forage, fertilization, human and animal food, hunting, ber, wood fuel, landscape,
biodiversity, etc.
Regulating: seed dissemination, species conservation, clean air, habitats, plant species control and
regeneration, water cycle regulation, soil protection, wildre prevention, oods and erosion prevention,
microclimate regulation, carbon storage, etc.
Cultural: tourism, hunting, cultural identity and values, spiritual values, recreational and health
benets, traditional and scientic knowledge, etc.
Supporting: nutrient cycle maintenance, pollination, etc.
8 See also Homann et al 2014
9 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2003, Ch. 2: Ecosystems and their services, Fig. 2.1.
Illus tration by Div ya Venkatesh, Di versEart h
Environmental Axis
Photo Credit: Skink in an
Eastern Herzegovinian forest
© Pablo Manzano
14 Environmental Axis
According to IUCN the Mediterranean Basin is one of the world’s richest places
in terms of animal and plant diversity and it is recognized as one of the rst
25 Global Biodiversity Hotspots10, largely due to traditional pastoral practices.
Pastoralism creates habitats without which other species could not survive (such
as certain invertebrate and bird species), sustaining their botanical diversity to a
high degree – in therophyte-dominated pastures, 180 spp/0.1 ha and 30 spp/400
cm2 can be found11. Well-managed livestock can also prevent the spread of
invasive species12.
Regarding the maintenance of ecological functions, transhumant routes can be
acknowledged as ecological corridors along which millions of seeds and insects
are moved via the animals’ coats and eeces, hooves and droppings. A herd of
1000 transhumant sheep in Spain transports as many as 200 million ingested
seeds along drove roads during their 1,500 km long migration with a mean
dispersal distance of 40 km13 - other means of dispersal such as seeds attached
to the eece14, or seed spitting15 should be added to this gure. ese animal
movements interconnect valuable habitats and protected areas, avoiding their
isolation and fragmentation, which are amongst the most serious threats these
areas face today.
e role drove roads play in habitat connectivity is not restricted to the dispersal
phenomena; they provide habitat heterogeneity that increases plant diversity16
and serve as a refuge habitat for birds17 or arthropods18, including pollinators
that can yield key ecosystem services19, in otherwise hostile intensive land use
landscapes. eir fractal nature20 multiplies their connectivity, which is however
linked to keeping them in use. Given the heavy fragmentation in, for example,
European habitats, this feature is very relevant for the EU’s Green Infrastructure
strategy21 - to which the eect of homogenization derived from intensication is
Mobile pastoralism is also relevant in the maintenance of food webs. Dierent
scavengers along the Mediterranean basin are favoured through pastoralism23,
as are insects providing valuable ecosystem services associated with nutrient
cycling, such as dung beetles24, especially if adequate, moderate livestock
numbers are applied25, or ants26.
11 Peco et al 2006
12 DiTomaso, 2000
13 Manzano 2015a:145
14 Manzano & Malo 2006
15 Delibes et al 2017
16 Azcárate et al 2013a
17 Lentini et al 2011
18 Azcárate et al 2013b
19 Hevia et al 2016
20 Manzano Baena & Casas 2010
21 European Commission 2013
22 Gossner et al 2016
23 Marinković & Karadzić 1999, Xirouchakis & Nikolakakis 2002, Mateo-Tomás 2013
24 Barbero et al 1999
25 Tonelli et al 2017
26 Manzano et al 2010
Environmental Axis
Bats can also benet from extensive livestock, in turn providing pest control
e latest available data for the EU show that one of the main causes of
biodiversity depletion in Europe is the abandonment of pastoral practices28.
is is in spite of several pasture types being legally recognized as “priority
natural habitat types of Community interest” by the Habitat Directive and the
EU thus stating legal obligation to protect them. ere is an increasing demand
to include sustainable agricultural practices as a tool for conservation (EFNCP
2015b)29. Grazed pastures have shown to be the only cultural landscape whose
abandonment triggers a biodiversity loss, and their species composition bears the
highest resemblance to ecosystems that are considered “natural30. Intermediate
disturbance through grazing sustains species diversity31. e decline of species
as threatened as the Iberian lynx, among others, dependent on grassland-
scrubland mosaics maintained by livestock32, or amphibians whose populations
are sustained by traditional water infrastructure for livestock33, are linked with
pastoralist abandonment.
Fire prevention. Wildres devastate the Mediterranean year aer year with
huge losses of economic, social, environmental and cultural values. One of the
root causes is the abandonment of pastoral practices, so the biomass previously
consumed by animals is le untouched, forming fuel for wildres. Lands
under silvopastoralist use have proven to be less prone to wildres because of
understorey reduction34. Additionally, livestock has proven to be very useful in
maintaining rebreaks35. is adds to the usefulness of controlled, traditionally
prescribed res by pastoralists – and where the involvement of the public sector
is possible and positive36.
In spite of pastoralists being routinely accused of overgrazing and forest damage,
extensive livestock has proven to sustain adequate regeneration of tree cover in
parkland/savanna-like landscapes. Livestock that migrates seasonally leaves the
pasture just at the time when the grass starts to become scarce and before the
animals start browsing on young saplings, allowing for their survival37. Adequate
livestock management, oen consisting in mobile pastoralism, preserves some
shrubs in the landscape that provide shade to young trees and shelter them from
grazing, improving their survival rate up to adult age38 and ensuring the long-
term durability of the ecosystem.
27 Ancillotto et al 2017
28 European Environment Agency 2015
29 EF NCP 2015b
30 Plieninger et al 2014
31 Dumont et al. 2012
32 Palomares et al. 2001
33 Canals et al. 2011
34 Rigueiro-Rodríguez et al 2005
35 Ruiz Mirazo 2011
36 Vélez 2010
37 Carmona et al 2013
38 Perea et al 2016
Photo Credit: Iberian lynx.
© CBD-Habitat
16 Environmental Axis
Livestock grazing can also be used as a tool for soil restoration. Vegetation cover
can be restored, therefore preventing oods and erosion. In the process, plant39
and arthropod40 diversity can also be improved. Low grazing pressure has been
observed to be a preferable restoration strategy than complete grazing cessation
or aorestation41. e full restoration of previous diversity is challenging,
however, so preventing abandonment is preferable42. Additionally, manure
has the capacity to increase soil macroaggregates, compaction resistance and
water content capacity43, all of which have a direct positive eect on resistance
to erosion. Livestock corralling (“bomas” or “kraals”) is routinely used as a
technique to regenerate degraded vegetation and soils in Eastern Africa44,
equivalent to the practice of folding livestock in Europe (“redileo” in Spain). In a
mutually benecial relationship, livestock benets from high-diversity pastures
in terms of nutrition and health, even if feeding from hay45.
Livestock plays an important role in soil nutrient cycling. In agropastoralist
(crop-livestock) systems, mineralization of organic matter is to a large extent
done by bacteria in the dung46 that dung beetles as well as ants and termites
further contribute to incorporate into the soil47. ese processes generate a
net nutrient transfer from rangelands to croplands48, thereby fertilizing crops
and contributing to food security. ey also steer a slow release of N and other
nutrients, therefore preventing water pollution by leaching49. While livestock
remains fundamental for its role in nutrient cycling even in very densely
populated humid areas50, this sustainable fertilization strategy has however been
superseded by the use of resources from fossil reserves51.
While water exhaustion and water usage are related to land degradation, a large
water footprint is routinely attributed to livestock. A better understanding of
green water vs. blue water demand is desirable52, however, particularly in the case
of water usage by traditional pastoralists. As their use of blue water (i.e. water
extracted from streams or reservoirs) is minimal if at all, and their use of green
water (i.e. rainwater) has no impact on the general availability of water, given
their reliance on natural vegetation, their water footprint can be considered nil53.
Most importantly, the benets on soil structure mentioned above also have a
direct benet in the water storage capacity and in the regulating water cycle.
39 Pykälä, 2003
40 Pöyry et al., 2004
41 Papanastasis et al 2017
42 Muller et al. 1998
43 Blanco-Canqui et al 2015, Mikha et al 2015
44 Kimiti et al 2017, Huruba et al 2017
45 French 2017
46 Haynes & Williams 1993:149, Runo et al 2006
47 Slade et al 2016a, Manzano et al in prep
48 Powell et al 1996, Schiere & Kater 2001, Runo et al 2006
49 Runo et al 2006
50 orne & Tanner 2002
51 Schiere et al 2002
52 Hoekstra 2016
53 Scholtz et al 2013, Pster et al 2017
Climate Change Axis
Photo Credit: Raza Merina
Negra. © Familia Cabello
Bravo, Siruela (Badajoz)
18 Climate Change Axis
While mobile pastoralism has been rather more linked to climate change
adaptation, here we list signicant arguments to also take it into account as an
important element of mitigation strategies.
Regarding carbon storage, grazing has a crucial role in CO2 osets and grazing
land is one of the largest sinks for long-term carbon sequestration. On the other
hand, degraded or tilled pastures can release large amounts of carbon dioxide
into the atmosphere. Keeping these areas managed under sustainable grazing
practices is essential for climate change mitigation.
e potential of grazed ecosystems to store carbon in the soil is illustrated by
the IPCC report on land use change54. Savanna or grasslands store most of the
carbon in the soil, highlighting the sequestration potential of good livestock
practices. is has been the central argument to soen the mainstream message
of extensive livestock as a big GHG source55. Given the high dependence of
carbon storage potential on seasonality and water availability56, adequate soil
conditions that retain water and allow for extended soil moisture (see above) will
be essential for translating it into actual soil carbon xation.
Mobile pastoralism can also have a very relevant role in low-carbon livestock
production. Pastoralism, along with other livestock practices that vary in their
degree of extensication, has been largely attributed with large carbon footprints,
which end up osetting potential benets of e.g. sequestration in rangeland
soils57, to a great extent because of the intensity of methane and nitrous oxide
emission in cellulose-rich diets and their very strong greenhouse eect in the
short term. ese attributions are nevertheless contentious, because they do not
take into account baseline emissions in ecosystems58 and the very low fossil fuel
use footprint by pastoral practices (because of less reliance on industrial animal
feed59). Fuel-derived carbon dioxide is a much more dangerous greenhouse gas
in the long term, i.e. a scale of thousands of years60. is eect is also measurable
in terms of energy, which illustrates the trade-o between eciency as currently
measured and sustainability61. is basically translates into mobile pastoralism
being the most climate-friendly livestock production system. If this argument
is taken into account, the lower demand of extensive systems for croplands and
fodder, being able to feed on grass from marginal lands or by-products from
crop production and food processing62 would make sustainable diets achievable.
Dung-burying insects such as dung beetles63 or ants64 seem also to have a
54 Table 4 at IPCC 2000
55 Garnett 2009
56 Hovenden et al 2014
57 Gerber et al 2013
58 Manzano & White submitted
59 Casas & Manzano 2011, Global Justice Now 2015, Vigan et al 2017
60 Manzano & White submitted
61 Rodríguez-Ortega et al 2017
62 Schader et al 2015, Röös et al 2016
63 Slade et al 2016b
64 Manzano et al in prep
Climate Change Axis
relevant role in reducing current estimates of GHG
emissions from manure excreted by pastoralist
In the discussions around climate change,
pastoralism has been mainly mentioned because
of its undeniable advantages for climate change
adaptation, as they are intimately linked with their
resilience strategies. Publications on the issue
are abundant for sub-saharan Africa65, but there
are also examples of global scope66. is is not
surprising, mobile pastoralism being a livelihood
that has developed not to cope with but to prot
from unpredictable resources67, even if this concept
is dicult to understand both by scientists and
Among the factors that contribute to the adaptation
capacity of mobile pastoralists, perhaps the most
important ones are mobility and communal land
management. Both elements allow pastoralists to
have a large pool of natural resources, not restricted
to private lands. Grazing resources can therefore be
optimized both in terms of quality (accessing the
best available fodder) and quantity (no grass will be
le ungrazed because of insucient animals e.g. in
an extraordinarily productive year). In the context
of climate change, the ability to cope with changes is
easily derived from these strategies. Any attempt to
disrupt mobility will easily translate into a dramatic
and oen fatal loss of resilience69.
Indigenous breeds are also an essential element, as
they are adapted not only to local environments but
also to the practices of the community. Repeated
attempts to introduce “improved” breeds that cannot
cope with the local production regime are therefore
totally counterproductive for intended development
65 e.g. Nassef et al 2009, WISP 2010, Kisangani & Abdel Aziz 2011,
Manzano 2014
66 Nori & Davies 2007, Neely et al 2009
67 Krätli 2015
68 Krätli et al 2015
69 Nori et al 2008
70 Manzano 2015b, Manzano 2017
Photo Credit (from top to
bottom): Water provision
to livestock through water
troughs; Transhumant ock
migrating through dry
pastures; Transhumant ock
migrating through snow
covered pastures.
© Trashumancia y Naturaleza
20 Breadcrumb
Economic Axis
Photo Credit: Locally
adapted Pramenka sheep in
Eastern Herzegovina.
© Pablo Manzano
Economic Axis
Given the uniqueness of many pastoralist products, markets oer great
opportunities for pastoralist development71, but mobile pastoralism also has
a particular advantage at xing human population, creating sustainable
economic networks in rural areas. is is especially important in those areas
considered marginal for the current economic model, which make them
vulnerable to a lack of investment and depopulation, feeding the vicious circle of
socio-economic decline of these areas.
However, regarding low population density and marginal lands for crop
production, pastoralism might be the best cost-ecient option72 as few other
economic activities are possible. Pastoralism can also play a unique role
to structure a sustainable economic network in areas where diversity and
product specicity are central market values73, and that rely on diversied and
complementary networks of small enterprises and family businesses which will
bring more resilience to rural economies (responding to the logic that it is “better
to have 1000 businesses with 4 workers than only 1 enterprise of 4000 workers”).
is can be the foundation for a strong and resilient rural economy, by creating
sustainable direct and indirect jobs and stimulating peripheral economies (linked
with dierent types of tourism, handicras, wine and gastronomy, etc.). is
would also contribute to facilitate traditionally marginalized groups (e.g. women)
to access jobs or become entrepreneurs, and to alleviate the out-migration of
young people to urban areas due to the lack of job opportunities.
Pastoralism can also benet from the steadily increasing demand for sustainable
food and other products containing “dierent” values (social, cultural or health
Organic: Substantial growth is envisaged in North America and Northern
Europe (with Germany at the top), but also in the Mediterranean – Spain
being the rst producer, and h worldwide (where 53.2 % consists of
permanent grassland and grazing areas74), and France and Italy are second
and fourth consumer countries respectively. e three strongest per capita
consumer countries in the world are also European (Switzerland, Denmark
and Sweden)75. To make the most of these opportunities, the Mediterranean
organic sector should develop a strategic vision focused on cooperation among
dierent actors in various areas (legislation, policies, information, research and
extension, market etc.), with a view to achieving a more harmonious and sound
development of the sector at both national and international contexts76.
• Other sustainable food categories, like eco-labeled foods, sustainable sourcing,
traceability, nature protection, etc. are envisaged to rise. As some market
research has shown, up to 85% of consumers would choose a Natura 2000 labeled
product, conrming the willingness of consumers to support biodiversity and
71 McGahey et al 2014
72 Western 1982, Krätli 2015
73 Mathias et al 2010
74 EcoLogical 2016
75 Willer & Lernoud 2017
76 Pugliese et al. 2014
22 Economic Axis
local economic activity in rural areas77.
Sustainability metrics are likely to be prominent,
(particularly signicant for mobile pastoralism
regarding carbon neutral pledges) and also food
authenticity and traceability – greater investment
is envisaged in ingredient supply chains to allow
transparency and reduce the risk of food fraud and
• e future consumer prole seems to show
a tendency of reducing meat consumption
(particularly red meat, considered more unhealthy)
while looking for food that benets both health and
the environment, and from local and trustworthy
producers. ere is big potential here for pastoral
products, although some eorts on innovation, new
products and better communication to targeted
consumers must be developed79.
However, out of these specic market niches,
mobile pastoralism is threatened by the current
structure of the economic environment. Even if the
environmental values it provides are recognized, the
current market is not yet able to pay for them, and
the organic market is still insucient to promote
their best practices80. e costs are higher for these
labour-intensive systems, so price competition with
products from industrial farming (which also control
part of the market supply chain) is dicult.
Regarding import/export markets, pastoralist
products from developing countries could also
benet from accessing wealthier country markets,
through adding value in origin and promoting
local skills and resources for local food production,
processing and trade. e recognition of this fact
is nevertheless still challenging81 and will depend
on trade agreements being favourable to pastoral
products from small farming systems. is point can
also be controversial as export/import markets will
always involve transport and therefore more carbon
Access to the wider public is also challenging for
pastoral products, as the majority of consumers
77 SEO/Bi rdLife 2 017
78 Ecovia Intelligence 2017
79 Interovic 2017
80 Escribano et al 2015a
81 Manzano 2016
Photo Credit (from top
to bottom): QueRed (the
Spanish association for
artisanal cheese making) at
the Slow Food Cheese Fair in
Bra, Italy. © Concha Salguero
Cheese making.
© Trashumancia y Naturaleza
Eco-lodge Kamena Gora.
© Pablo Manzano
Economic Axis
innately tend to select oligopolies that control the
mid-quality markets82. Joint marketing action in
pastoralist collectives, however, could help tackle
these issues83, not only by classifying products
and marketing them eciently according to their
quality84, but also by promoting a more stable food
market, based on a closer interaction between
producer and consumer that avoids unnecessary
intermediary market chain actors.
So product diversication and innovation are key
to success. For example new market niches, such as
demand for “grass meat” (meat from animals that
feed only on grass, without industrial feed) that seem
to be growing, present a big potential for extensive
grazing meat. “Fih range products”85 also oer
great potential as a new market niche for pastoralists,
as they can shorten the market chain and facilitate
wider access to urban consumers, including
restaurants, increasing the demand for this type of
product. Some experiences are already in place86.
e potential of grazed lands for carbon xation has
already been discussed in this document, but access
of pastoralists to carbon markets has remained
challenging to date, e.g. due to ownership issues and
the attribution of potential carbon payments87, issues
in determining correct management schemes88,
or high transaction costs89. However, econometric
analyses show the higher potential of more diverse
grasslands in xing more carbon, which combined
with other ecosystem services provided by
biodiversity may reinforce the economic arguments
for conservation and for payments for ecosystem
services even further90.
Complementary activities and peripheral economies
can also increase the protability of pastoralism. For
example, opportunities for tourism around drover
roads have been extensively studied in Spain,
82 Fernández-Márquez et al 2016
83 Manzano & Agarwal 2015
84 cf. section “Improvement of food quality” in this document
87 Tennigkeit & Wilkes 2008, Dougill et al 2012
88 Orgill et al 2017
89 Lipper et al 2010
90 Hungate et al 2017
where they are even mentioned in the White Book
on Transhumance91. ese ancient routes have been
mapped and protected in some Mediterranean
countries and they constitute an excellent
heritage for outdoor activities, compatible with
transhumance uses, as recognised in the Spanish
Act on Drove Roads, 199592. Transhumance as a
tourism activity93 is increasingly being developed as
a side income for many mobile pastoralists in Spain,
and as a tourist attraction in Italy94, highlighting the
potential to other countries in the region.
Traditionally, rural economies have been based
on “multifunctionality” (not on monoculture
or specialization) so income and eciency came
from the combination of dierent activities and
community deals. is might be one of the reasons
why pastoralism and other traditional practices do
not accommodate for mass production, standarised
and specialised markets. e economies of scale,
low price competition and other key concepts
of industrial production are alien (and oen
contradictory) to practitioners of such traditional
is is why, in the current market context the strong
competitive point of rural areas is “diversity” as
opposed to standardization and mass production.
Traditional products must be linked to the territory
and culture and therefore to the sustainability
of their natural resources, involving the human
resources of the local community.
New trends in economy, such as the so called
“collaborative” or “sharing economy”, can also have
a positive inuence in catalysing changes in favour
of traditional products and practices. However, for
this to happen, establishing a reliable internet access
in rural areas and other enabling conditions, will be
91 AAV V 201 2
92 Boletín Ocial del Estado 1995
93 Antón Burgos 2007
94 King ton 2010
95 Wagner et al 2015
24 Breadcrumb
Social Axis
Photo Credit: Cowboys:
Black Avileña. Cattle farmers:
García-Santana Brothers,
Navadijos (Avila, Spain).
Summer transhumance from
the lowlands of Extremadura
to the high summer pastures
in the Gredos Mountains.
© Gema Arrugaeta,
Spain, 2014.
Social Axis
One of the main, awed political arguments to implement policies destructive to
mobile pastoralism is a humanitarian one: the repeated occurrence of famines in
pastoralist areas. is ignores the fact that pastoralist livelihoods are the best
at yielding agricultural production in the areas they live in96, and that crises
are usually the consequence of a poor understanding of pastoralist livelihoods97.
Sucient, well-tailored investment in pastoralist areas has the capacity to reduce
e same mechanisms that underlie pastoralist livelihood resilience are the ones
that explain why mobile pastoralism achieves food security in otherwise harsh
environments. Additionally, they achieve optimization of resources in marginal
lands for crop production, as already described in the early 80s in the Sahel99.
is, however, is not an exclusive feature of mobile pastoralism in drylands, but
also in other ecosystems such as cold100 and mountainous101 areas.
Mobile pastoralism also yields important services for crop production by
facilitating pollination: increases in grassland biodiversity, even if modest,
improve pollinator availability and eciency102 and therefore benet crop yields.
Mobile livestock is less aected by animal diseases, because of the trouble
parasites have in establishing refugia103. is is contradictory to the widespread
veterinary strategy to immobilize livestock in order to treat diseases through
drenching. Livestock reared in the open air and fed on natural pastures is more
likely to be t and resistant to disease, especially local/native breeds, which are
usually hardier and more adapted to local conditions. is reduces the incidence
of water and soil pollution and the reliance on veterinary products104. ese
benets are transmitted to the meat, milk and other derived products resulting
in high quality, more secure, and healthier food. Special attention should be
given to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance, which has attracted attention
from the World Health Organization105 and from European institutions106.
is has triggered the involvement of international organizations that lead on
veterinary health issues such as FAO107 or OIE108 .
96 Krätli 2015
97 Krätli et al 2015, Manzano 2017
98 de Haan et al 2016
99 Breman & de Wit 1983
100 Dwyer & Istomin 2009
101 Manzano Baena & Casas 2010, EFNCP 2015a
102 Orford et al 2016
103 Kenyon et al 2009
104 Eisner et al 2014
105 WHO 2015
106 European Parliament News 2016
26 Social Axis
ere is solid evidence that pasture-fed animal
products consistently yield a better nutritional
prole, with direct obvious implications for
pastoral products. Benets are linked with a lipidic
composition that is better for human health,
essentially consisting in higher content of poly-
insaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) or conjugated
linoleic acids (CLAs), or higher Omega 3 content
(better Omega 6/Omega 3 balance). is is the case
for pork meat, of which the Iberian pig is the best
example of pastoralist production109, for beef110 as
well as for lamb111 and cow milk112 . In the latter case,
it is considered healthier even if the iodine content is
lower in pasture-fed animals.
Sustainable livestock production is able to provide
enough animal products for healthy human
diets (enough high-quality protein)113. is is an
important issue considering the increased alerts
about health risks caused by excessive red meat
consumption and its impact in the public debate114,
including eects on obesity115. It is also important
considering that intensive livestock production
impacts are regarded as inevitable because of the
rising demand in animal products that is supposedly
to be satised116; this rising and unhealthy demand
trend has very negative projections regarding
sustainability117. Importantly, the perception that
a vegan diet is most sustainable, because of the
lost eciency in the conversion of plant food into
animal food, is proved as awed in this case by the
use grazers make of uncultivable land: healthy diets
with moderate amounts of animal products have
indeed higher carrying capacity118. Based on the
evidence presented in the previous paragraph, it is
clear that such a scenario where animal foods are
obtained from mobile pastoralism would not only
be sustainable but would also provide the highest
quality of animal products.
109 Jiménez-Colmenero et al 2010
110 Średnicka-Tober et al 2016a
111 Howes et al 2014
112 Średnicka-Tober et al 2016b
113 Schader et al 2015
114 Rutsaert et al 2015
115 Wang & Beydoun 2009
116 FAO 20 04
117 Tilman & Clark 2014
118 Peters et al 2016
e practice of mobile pastoralism is deeply rooted
in the landscape and is imbibed with cultural
signicance. As such it is an important cultural
practice that contributes to the preservation of
cultural diversity119 and immaterial heritage120 in all
countries where it persists.
Mobile pastoralism, as a major traditional cultural
practice in the Mediterranean, dating as far back as
10,000 years, is a unique example of how biological
and cultural components have been constantly
interacting through millennia. is interaction has
shaped traditional Mediterranean landscapes and
produced innumerable cultural manifestations.
Traditional farmhouses, huts, watering points,
cultivated terraces, bridges, stone walls, hermitages
and monasteries, and a long list of other rural
architectural features form part of a material
heritage that is the physical expression of a long and
wise relationship between nature and humankind.
e maintenance of local breeds, themselves of
cultural importance, is another way in which
this practice contributes to maintaining cultural
Consequently, pastoral landscapes harbour a rich
cultural heritage, both material and immaterial,
which is crucial not only for our physical survival
but also for our spiritual sense of identity and
e immaterial heritage of pastoralism in the
Mediterranean is outstanding and can be found
in countless manifestations of folklore, local
agroecosystems, traditional ecological knowledge,
cultural practices, art, traditional celebrations,
gastronomy, poetry, and so forth. Some selected
examples are provided in the Annex by way of
119 Casas & Hernández Yustos 2012
120 Boletín Ocial del Estado 2017
121 Köhler-Rollefson 1997, 2001
Social Axis
Mobile pastoralism is able to improve territorial
balance. e high labour intensity of the livelihood
and the high added value of its products, as
mentioned above, are able to support more people in
rural areas122, sustaining strong, vibrant and resilient
communities. Rural areas need to be provided with
basic services in order to attract young people and
a variety of professionals to reduce out-migration
to urban areas and tackle the depopulation that is
becoming critical in some Mediterranean areas123.
Simultaneously, record numbers of migrants and
asylum-seekers arrive from other parts of the
Mediterranean, most of them living in overcrowded
conditions in temporary camps. is challenging
paradox should be a central point of reection in
social and economic decision making processes and
crucial for the future of rural life.
However, at policy level the contrary has happened,
with small scale farming in rural areas largely
ignored. Ocial gures show that for example in
the EU, between 2003-2010, three million farms
disappeared, of which nearly 80% were smaller than
5 ha. In contrast, the number of farms larger than 50
ha increased by nearly 30,000 in the same period124.
is can be attributed to a European Common
Agricultural Policy (CAP) that for decades has
favoured industrial farms with a productivity focus,
while displacing those that generate the highest
quality products with the least negative impact.
Latest CAP reforms seem to deepen the disadvantage
of farms in low-performing areas125.
High value products protect smaller farms from
being outcompeted, and this has proved critical
for Mediterranean livestock owners, particularly
due to quality certication initiatives126. is is
very important to guarantee some stability of rural
populations in areas of low agricultural potential.
Gender is a major factor explaining rural
depopulation and the collapse of pastoral systems.
122 Escribano et al 2015b
123 Pinilla et a l 2006
124 DGAR D 2013:162
125 Giannakis & Bruggeman 2015
126 Ligios et al 2005, Pimlin et al 2006
e fundamental role of women in pastoralist
societies has been well described, but also the
labour division around gender lines and their low
empowerment in traditional settings127. While
women’s mobility can be constrained in less
developed settings128, their abandonment of the
rural landscape in more developed countries poses
a real problem of social sustainability129 as well as
of cultural erosion that can compromise future
innovation and diversication opportunities,
with industries such as cheese-making tied to
the traditional knowledge of women. Women’s
empowerment130 is therefore a fundamental
strategy for the long-term sustainability of pastoral
societies. Empowerment of pastoralist women to
make them part of the decision making process
would be a decisive change for keeping rural areas
alive and in turn traditional practices such as mobile
pastoralism. In some countries women are starting
to react and creating their own groups131.
Mobile pastoralism has the ability to provide the
highest levels of animal welfare among livestock
husbandry. Whereas intensive systems have been
heavily criticised for ethical concerns, pastoralist
systems cannot be viewed in the same light. Animals
in extensive husbandry techniques enjoy the open
pasture, exercise and natural food, and this make
them much less prone to disease. Additionally
in terms of productivity, they benet from lower
veterinary treatments, availability of shadowed
shelters and variety in food choice132. Livestock
intensication implies an increase in animal
densities that also has a direct impact in animal
welfare loss133.
127 Flintan 2008
128 Ilcan 1994
129 Ní Laoire 2001, Hoggart & Paniagua 2001
130 IUCN 2013
131 For example, Ganaderas en Red in Spain: https://www.facebook.
132 Broom et al 2013, Broom 2016
133 Llonch et al 2016
28 Breadcrumb
Policy Action
Photo Credit: Watch out,
sheep crossing!
© Wassim Ghozlani,
Tataouine-Tunisia, 2014.
Policy Action
Mobile pastoralism has been the victim of poor policies worldwide134,
mainly due to poor understanding at political decision-making levels. e
Mediterranean is no exception with, for example, an EU Common Agriculture
Policy that fails to support pastoralism135 and that is unable to understand the
functioning of woodland pastures136 or traditional governance systems such as
common grazing lands137.
e public policy steps needed in support of mobile pastoralism should build
upon evidence presented here in order to help comply with other national and
international legislation. Arguments and supportive data have been put forth
so that the commitments within the UN Conventions (Biological Diversity,
Desertication and Land Degradation, and Climate Change) can be honoured.
Other relevant legislation includes nature conservation regulations, animal
husbandry and animal welfare regulations, Rural Development Strategies,
EU 2020 Strategy, etc. Further legislation could be built upon the 2016 UNEA
resolution (UN Environmental Assembly) in favour of pastoralism138.
A traditional element to avoid conict of livestock keepers with predators in the
Mediterranean while allowing for their co-existence has been the use of livestock
protection dogs139, with local breeds in nearly every corner of the Mediterranean
basin. However, use of such dogs is increasingly being limited by Breed-Specic
Laws created to protect the general public against potentially dangerous
dogs. Specic provisions are required to protect the use of working dogs with
pastoralists in order to minimize human-wildlife conict. On the contrary,
wise use of these dogs should be encouraged or even subsidized in light of the
increasing conicts with expanding bear and wolf populations. Further research
is also needed to establish best practices in pastoral dog management140.
Another dicult issue is in relation to sanitary and food hygiene regulations,
such as those for animal disease control, animal husbandry and food
processing. ese are usually tailored to meet larger-scale industrial needs,
making compliance very dicult for small producers. Good examples are
the cheese processing regulations: in some countries, the same hygiene and
sanitary requirements are applied irrespective of whether the producer is a
large factory or a small artisanal holding. is oen leads to the prohibition of
on-site cheese-making for livestock farmers, or makes investment in cheese-
making unaordable for small producers. e adaptation of the current cheese
production regulations to artisanal production is therefore crucial to their
competitiveness: the European Commission has recently approved a guide
for Good Hygiene Practices in the production of artisanal cheese and dairy
products141, which is an important step forward.
134 de Jode 2010, Khazanov, 2013
135 Giannakis & Bruggeman 2015
136 EFNCP 2015a
137 EFNCP 2015b
138 UNE P 2016
139 Cummins 2008
140 Eklund et al 2017
141 Eklund et al 2017
30 Policy Action
e progressive closure of small rural
slaughterhouses is another handicap for small
livestock farmers. It is not only that the animals
have to be taken further to be slaughtered (with
more distress for the animals), but also that
slaughterhouses are oen large and privately owned
and they are in a strong position to impose prices
and other conditions. One potential solution could
be using small scale mobile processing units. is
would reduce costs, improve animal welfare and
ease market access for small producers. However,
in general, current legislation does not facilitate the
use of this alternative, despite its strong potential
for rebuilding local and sustainable food systems.
However some experiences have been already
implemented in for instance the USA and Sweden,
and new voices are rising for the approval of such
systems in countries such as France and Spain142.
Specic strategies should also be designed to
support high-value products associated with
high quality. Specic marketing of the pastoral
products’ superior quality is well proven to be the
best opportunity for the survival and livelihood of
pastoral communities, but it still needs support. e
bottleneck for organic meat farms in Western Spain,
for example, has been the conservative middlemen,
who still do not demand enough high-quality
products to sustain organic farms – even if the
interest of individual consumers is keeping pace with
the change of producer mentalities143.
National agricultural policies, or the CAP in
the case of European Union members, should be
redesigned with several aspects in mind. Public
payments to agriculture should be structured in
a way to dierentiate extensive from intensive
livestock production (Box 2), while territories
should get dierential treatment according to their
conservation value14 4. Public funds and policies
should support and promote agricultural systems
that provide public and ecosystem services, and plan
to put an end to production systems that degrade
and deplete natural resources and social wellbeing.
142 Goma r 2016
143 Escribano et al 2015a
144 EFNCP 2015b
Photo Credit (from top
to bottom): Drove roads
demarcated by a milestone;
Drove roads are also used for
ecotourism activities such as
© Trashumancia y Naturaleza
Policy Action
We oen talk about “extensive farming systems” in contrast with “intensive farming systems”. e
former means low input farming systems where the livestock lives outdoors, ranging the territory and
grazing the local natural resources, managed mainly through pastoralism and without any - or very
little - use of external inputs. e latter means an industrial way to maximize animal food production,
by applying industry methods through the concentration of a high number of livestock indoors,
fed and kept by the intense use of external inputs. e extensive systems are highly sustainable
and produce environmental benets, while the intensive systems produce a number of negative
environmental impacts.
However, the sustainability of livestock production shows dierent degrees of impact according to the
degree of intensication. ree major levels can be established: extensive, mixed and industrial. e
rst one roughly corresponds to mobile pastoralism; the second corresponds to animals kept in open
elds but fed to a large extent with fodder; while the third one corresponds to feedlots. Mixed and
industrial systems show distinct environmental impacts, yet they are continually considered together
in national statistics and decisions, which hinders the development of appropriate policies.
Mixed systems are very common on both shores of the Mediterranean due to fodder subsidies, in
principle provided to help poor livestock keepers. ey are oen identied with pastoralism but cause
specic environmental problems such as land degradation. is happens because of nutrient depletion
if livestock densities145 are too high; demand for brous food above the available carrying capacity
because of high protein input in fodder that needs to be compensated by bre, as is the case in Algeria
and Syria146, or general increased trampling. Fodder subsidies have proven to trigger overstocking and
land degradation147.
Dierentiating pastoralist systems from less extensive systems is also necessary when designing
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) mitigation policies14 8; current proposals that do not dierentiate among
them149 can have a big impact in undermining pastoralist systems while at the same time not fullling
the aimed objectives150, as pastoralist systems are negligible GHG emitters if adequate baseline
emission levels are accounted for. Conversely mixed systems, promoted by current subsidy schemes,
increase GHG emissions due to higher demand for industrial fodder, with its associated footprint, and
to a number of ineciencies in feed digestion and management151.
Pastoralism on the other hand is an environmentally friendly production system that should therefore
be promoted with an environmental perspective, while more intensive systems should be gradually
led and encouraged to increasingly comply with more sustainable production standards. It would
therefore be advisable to make a clear statistical distinction between intensive and pastoralist systems,
so that distinct and appropriate environmental policies can be designed for both.
143 Powell et al 1996
144 Hazell et al 2001:19-23
145 Hazell et al op, cit., Fundación Entretantos forthcoming
146 Fundación Entretantos forthcoming
147 Key & Tallard 2012
148 Vigan et al 2017, Manzano & White submitted
149 Herrero et al 2016
32 Breadcrumb
Shortcomings /
Knowledge Gaps
Photo Credit: e
Sarakeçililer know how to
communicate with their
animals... this is crucial for
maintaining harmony on the
long journey.
© Bari Koca, Turkey, 2014.
Shortcoming / Knowledge Gaps
Beyond the promotion of adequate policies, some knowledge gaps persist
around Mediterranean pastoralism that require future eorts to ensure accurate
A major shortcoming is the lack of documentation about drovers’ roads. We
have revised above how determinant these structures are for the provision
of ecosystem services. However, only France and Spain seem to have a more
or less complete catalogue of their drove roads that allows for protective
measures. Eorts are currently underway to map drove roads throughout the
National statistics do not discriminate between the dierent types of livestock
production systems and are not therefore able to determine how many people
are working in mobile pastoralism or how many animals they have, and
other basic information. In the case of the European Union this is particularly
deplorable, for there have been specic payments for “livestock extensication”.
is means that the information is managed by local administrations but there
is no demand for it to be incorporated into national statistics. Without that
information it is hard to design ecient interventions and, when researchers try
to come up with a number, they have to use indirect estimates152 that may not be
accurate enough. In North Africa and other Mediterranean areas the uncertainty
is even more acute making it challenging to design accurate and adequate
152 Casas Nogales & Manzano Baena 2007, Fundación Entretantos, Ruiz et al 2017
153 Dutilly-Diane 2007
Photo Credit: A map
showing transhumance
routes in the region between
Fethiye-Ka-Demre in
Turkey. © Engin Ylmaz
34 References
AA.VV. (2012) La Trashumancia en España. Libro
Blanco. Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación
y Medio Ambiente.
Ancillotto, L., Ariano, A., Nardone, V., Budinski,
I., Rydell, J., Russo, D. (2017). Eects of free-
ranging cattle and landscape complexity on bat
foraging: Implications for bat conservation and
livestock management. Agriculture, Ecosystems &
Environment 241, 54-61.
Antón Burgos, F.J. (2007). Trashumancia y turismo
en España. Cuadernos de Turismo 20, 27-54. http://
Azcárate F.M., Robleño I., Seoane J., Manzano P.,
Peco B. (2013a) Drove roads as local biodiversity
reservoirs: eects on landscape pattern and plant
communities in a Mediterranean region. Applied
Vegetation Science 16, 480-490. http://dx.doi.
Azcárate F.M., Seoane J., Castro, S., Peco B. (2013b)
Drove roads: Keystone structures that promote ant
diversity in Mediterranean forest landscapes. Acta
Oecologica 40, 107-115.
Barbero,E.; Palestrini, C. & Rolando, A. (1999). Dung
Beetle Conservation: Eects of Habitat and Resource
Selection (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea). Journal
of Insect Conservation 3, 75-84. http://dx.doi.
Blanco-Canqui H, Hergert, G. W., Nielsen, R. A.
(2015). Cattle Manure Application Reduces Soil
Compactibility and Increases Water Retention aer
71 Ye ars. Soil Science Society of America Journal 79,
Boletín Ocial del Estado (1995). Ley 3/1995,
de 23 de marzo, de Vias Pecuarias. BOE 71,
Boletín Ocial del Estado (2017). Real Decreto
385/2017, de 8 de abril, por el que se declara la
Trashumancia como Manifestación Representativa
del Patrimonio Cultural Inmaterial. BOE 86,
Breman, H. & de Wit, C.T. (1983). Rangeland
Productivity and Exploitation in the Sahel. Science
221 (4618), 1341-1347.
Broom, D.M., Galindo, F.A., Murgueitio, E., 2013.
Sustainable, ecient livestock production with
high biodiversity and good welfare for animals.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological
Sciences 280, 20132025
Broom, D.M. 2016. Sentience, animal welfare and
sustainable livestock production. In Indigenous, eds
K.S R eddy, R.M.V. Prasad and K.A. Rao , 61 - 68.
Excel India Publishers: New Delhi.
Canals, R. M., Ferrer, V., Iriarte, A., Cárcamo, S., San
Emeterio, L., Villanueva, E. (2011). Emerging conicts
for the environmental use of water in high-valuable
rangelands. Can livestock water ponds be managed
as articial wetlands for amphibians? Ecological
Engineering 37, 1443–1452.
Carmona, C. P.; Azcárate, F. M.; Oteros-Rozas,
E.; González, J. A.; Peco, B. (2013) Assessing the
eects of seasonal grazing on holm oak regeneration:
Implications for the conservation of Mediterranean
dehesas. Biological Conservation 159, 240–247 http://
Casas Nogales, R. & Manzano Baena, P. (2007)
Valoración económica del pastoralismo en España.
WISP-IUCN document. 40 p. https://cmsdata.iucn.
Casas Nogales, R.; Manzano Baena, P. (2010)
Hagamos bien las cuentas. Eciencia y servicios
de la trashumancia en la Cañada Real Conquense
(Let’s do proper accounting. Eciency and services
from transhumance at the Conquense Drove Road).
II Congreso Nacional de Vías Pecuarias. Cáceres,
Spain. Pp: 302-315.
Casas, R., Hernández Yustos, R. (2012).
Conocimientos tradicionales en Segovia: conservación
del patrimonio natural a través de una actividad
tradicional: la trashumancia. Caja Segovia, Obra
Social y Cultural. 160 pp.
Cummins, B. D. (2008). Bear Country. Predation,
Politics, and the Changing Face of Pyrenean
Pastoralism. Carolina Academic Press. 378 pp.
Cuttelod, A., García, N., Abdul Malak, D., Temple,
H. and Katariya, V. 2008. e Mediterranean: a
biodiversity hotspot under threat. In: J.-C. Vié, C.
Hilton-Taylor and S.N. Stuart (eds). e 2008 Review
of e IUCN Red List of reatened
De Haan, C., Dubern, E., Garancher, B., Quintero,
C. (2016). Pastoralism Development in the Sahel. A
Road to Stability? World Bank Group, Washington
de Jode, H. (2010). Modern and mobile. e future of
livestock production in Africa’s drylands. IIED & SOS
Sahel, London.
Delibes M., Castañeda I., Fedriani J.M. (2017). Tree-
climbing goats disperse seeds during rumination.
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 15,
DGARD (2013). Agriculture in the European Union.
Statistical and economic information. European
Union, Brussels.
DiTomaso, J.M. (2000). Invasive weeds in rangelands:
species, impacts, and management. Weed Science
48, 255–265.
Dougill, A.J., Stringer, L.C., Leventon, J., Riddell, M.,
Rue, H., Spracklen, D.V., Butt, E. (2012). Lessons
from community-based payment for ecosystem service
schemes: from forests to rangelands. Phil. Trans. R.
Soc. B 367, 3178–3190.
Dumont, B., Rossignol, N., Loucougaray, G., Carrère,
P., Chadoeuf, J., Fleurance, G., Bonis, A., Farruggia,
A., Gaucherand S., Ginane, C., Louault, F., Marion,
B., Mesléard, F. & Yavercovski, N. (2012). When
does grazing generate stable vegetation patterns in
temperate pastures? Agriculture, Ecosystems and
Environment, 153, 50-56.
Dutilly-Diane, C. (2007). Pastoral economics and
marketing in North Africa: a literature review.
Nomadic Peoples 11, 69-90.
Dwyer, M.J. & Istomin, K.V. (2009). eories of
Nomadic Movement: A New eoretical Approach
for Understanding the Movement Decisions of Nenets
and Komi Reindeer Herders. Human Ecology 36: 521-
EcoLogical (2016) El sector Ecológico en España.
12 pp.
Ecovia Intelligence (2017) Predictions for Sustainable
Food in 2017.
Retrieved on 1st May 2017.
EFNCP (2015a). Europe’s wood pastures: condemned
to a slow death by the CAP? A test case for EU
agriculture and biodiversity policy. http://www.efncp.
EFNCP (2015b). Exploring our Common Ground. A
Networking Event on Common Grazing in Europe.
36 References
Eisler, M.C., Lee, M. R. F., Tarlton, J. F., Martin,
G. B., Beddington, J., Dungait, J. A. J., Greathead,
H., Liu, J., Mathew, S., Miller, H., Misselbrook, T.,
Murray, P., Vinod, V. K., Van Saun, R., & Winter,
M., (2014). Agriculture: Steps to sustainable livestock.
Nature 507, 32–34.
Eklund, A., López-Bao, J.V., Tourani, M., Chapron,
G., Frank, J. (2017). Limited evidence on the
eectiveness of interventions to reduce livestock
predation by large carnivores. Scientic Reports 7,
Escribano, AJ; Gaspar , P; Mesias, FJ; Escribano,
M., Pulido, F (2015a) Comparative Sustainability
Assessment of Extensive Beef Cattle Farms in a High
Nature Value Agroforestry System. In: Squires, Victor
R. (Ed.) Rangeland Ecology, Management and
Conservation Benets. Nova Science Publishers, Inc.,
New York, pp. 65-85.
Escribano, A.J., Gaspar, P., Mesias. F.J., Escribano,
M. (2015b). e contribution of organic livestock
to sustainable rural development in sensitive
areas. International Journal of Research Studies
in Agricultural Sciences (IJRSAS) 1, 21-34. http://
European Commission (2013). Green Infraestructure
(GI) – Enhancing Europe´s Natural Capital. COM
(2013) 249 Final.
European Environment Agency (2015). State of
the Environment of Europe Report 2015. Executive
summary. EEA, Copenhagen. http://www.eea.
European Parliament News (2016). Superbugs: MEPs
want to curb use of antibiotics in farming. Press
release, March 10th 2016. http://www.europarl.
FACEnetwork (2016). European Guide for Good
Hygiene Practices in the production of artisanal
cheese and dairy products.
FAO (2004). Protein sources for the animal feed
industry. Executive Summary.
Fernández-Márquez, C. M., Fatás-Villafranca, F.,
Vázquez, F. J. (201 6). Endogenous Demand and
Demanding Consumers: A Computational Approach.
Computational Economics.
Flintan, F., 2008. Women’s Empowerment in Pastoral
Societies. IUCN-World Initiative for Sustainable
Pastoralism 2008.
French, K.E. (2017). Species composition determines
forage quality and medicinal value of high diversity
grasslands in lowland England. Agriculture,
Ecosystems & Environment 241, 193-204. https://doi.
Gerber, P.J., Steinfeld, H., Henderson, B., Mottet,
A., Opio, C., Dijkman, J., Falcucci, A. & Tempio, G.
(2013). Tackling climate change through livestock
– A global assessment of emissions and mitigation
opportunities. FAO, Rome.
Giannakis, E., Bruggeman, A. (2015). e highly
variable economic performance of European
agriculture. Land Use Policy 45, 26-35. http://dx.doi.
Global Justice Now. (2015). Silence but deadly.
Estimating the real climate change impact of
agribussines corporations. http://www.globaljustice.les/les/resources/cop-paris-
Gomar, A. (2016) Tendiendo puentes. Como
acortar la cadena de productos cárnicos. Soberanía
Alimentaria 26. http://www.soberaniaalimentaria.
Homann I., From T., Boerma D. (2014). Ecosystem
services provided by livestock species and breeds,
with special consideration to the contributions of
small-scale livestock keepers and pastoralists. FAO
Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and
Agriculture. Background study paper no. 66. http://
Hoggart, K., Paniagua, A. (2001). e restructuring
of rural Spain? Journal of Rural Studies 17, 63–80.
Hovenden, M.J., Newton, P.C., Wills K.E. (2014).
Seasonal not annual rainfall determines grassland
biomass response to carbon dioxide. Nature 511,
Howes, N.L., El-Din Ahmed Bekhit, A., Burritt,
D.J., Campbell, A.W.(2014). Opportunities and
Implications of Pasture-Based Lamb Fattening to
Enhance the Long-Chain Fatty Acid Composition in
Meat. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and
Food Safety 14, 22–36.
Hungate, B.A., Barbier, E.B., Ando, A.W., Marks,
S.P., Reich, P.B., van Gestel,N., Tilman, D., Knops,
J.M.H., Hooper, D.U., Buttereld, B.J., Cardinale, B.J.
(2017). e economic value of grassland species for
carbon storage. Science Advances 3, e1601880. http://
Huruba, R., Mundy, P.J., Sebata, A., Purchase,
G.K., MacFayden, D.N. (2017). Impala, Aepyceros
melampus: does browse quality inuence their use of
sites originally utilised as short-duration kraals in a
southern African savanna? e Rangeland Journal
39, 113-121.
Ilcan, S.M. (1994). Peasant Struggles and Social
Change: Migration, Households and Gender
in a Rural Turkish Society. International
Migration Review 28, 554-579. http://dx.doi.
Interovic (2017). European promotion campaign
“Carne de lechal y cordero: vuelve a disfrutar de la
carne de cordero”.
de-resultados Retrieved on 1st May 2017.
Gossner,, M.M., Lewinsohn, M.T., Kahl, T., Grassein,
F., Boch, S., Prati, D., Birkhofer, K., Renner, S.C.,
Sikorski, J., Wubet, T., Arndt, H., Baumgartner,
V., Blaser, S., Blüthgen, N., Börschig, C., Buscot,
F., Diekötter, T., Ré Jorge, L., Jung, K., Keyel,
A.C., Klein, A.M., Klemmer, S., Krauss, J., Lange,
M., Müller, J. (2016). Land-use intensication
causes multitrophic homogenization of grassland
communities. Nature 540, 266–269. http://dx.doi.
Haynes, R.J., Williams, P.H. (1993). Nutrient Cycling
and Soil Fertility in the Grazed Pasture Ecosystem.
Advances in Agronomy 49, 119–199. http://dx.doi.
Hazell, PBR, Oram, P., Chaherli, N. (2001).
Managing droughts in the low-rainfall areas of the
Middle East and North Africa. Environment and
Production Technology Division Discussion Paper
No 78. Washington: International Food Policy
Research Institutele/
Herrero, M., ornton, P.K., Gerber, P., Reid, R.S.
(2012). Livestock, livelihoods and the environment:
understanding the trade-os. Current Opinion in
Environmental Sustainability 1:111–120. http://
Herrero, M., Henderson, B., Havlík, P., ornton,
P.K., Conant, R.T., Smith, P., Wirsenius,S., Hristov,
A.N., Gerber, P., Gill, M., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Valin,
H., Garnett, T., Stehfest, E. (2016). Greenhouse
gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector.
Nature Climate Change 6, 452–461. http://dx.doi.
Hevia, V., Bosch, J., Azcárate, F.M., Fernández, E.,
Rodrigo, A., Barril-Graells, H., González, J.A. 2016.
Bee diversity and abundance in a livestock drove
road and its impact on pollination and seed set in
adjacent sunower elds. Agriculture, Ecosystems
and Environment 232, 336–344. http://dx.doi.
Hoekstra, A.Y. (2016). A critique on the water-
scarcity weighted water footprint in LCA. Ecological
Indicators 66, 564–573.
38 References
IPCC (2000). IPCC Special Report. Climate Land
Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry. Summary for
Policymakers. WMO, UNEP. ISBN: 92-9169-114-3.
IUCN (2013). Women pastoralists’ empowerment:
Supporting positive change. Brieng note. WISP-
IUCN, Nairobi.
Jiménez-Colmenero, F., Ventanas, J,. Toldrá, F. (2010)
‘Nutritional composition of dry-cured ham and its
role in a healthy diet’, Meat Science 84(4): 585–593.
Kenyon, F., Greer, A.W., Coles, G.C., Cringoli, G.,
Papadopoulos, E., Cabaret, J., Berrag, B., Varady, M.,
Van Wyk, J.A., omas, E., Vercruysse, J., Jackson,
F. (2009). e role of targeted selective treatments
in the development of refugia-based approaches to
the control of gastrointestinal nematodes of small
ruminants. Veterinary Parasitology 164, 3–11. https://
Key, N. & Tallard, G. Mitigating methane emissions
from livestock: a global analysis of sectoral policies.
Climatic Change, 12, 387–414 (2012) http://naldc.nal.
Khazanov, A. M. (2013) Contemporary pastoralism:
old problems, new challenges. In: Sternberg, T.
& Chatty, D. (eds), Modern pastoralism and
conservation. Old problems, new challenges. White
Horse Press, Cambridge, pp 5-23.
Kimiti, D.W., Hodge, A-M.C., Herrick, J.E.,
Beh, A.W., Abbott, L.E. (2017). Rehabilitation of
community-owned, mixed-use rangelands: lessons
from the Ewaso ecosystem in Kenya. Plant Ecology
218, 23-37.
Kington, T. (2010). For a real Italian getaway,
follow the herd. e Guardian 7 February 2010.
Kisiangani, E., Abdel Aziz, M. (2011) e future of
pastoralism in a changing climate. JotoAfrika 11,
August 2011.le.
Köhler-Rollefson, I. (1997). Indigenous practices
of animal genetic resource management and their
relevance for the conservation of domestic animal
diversity in developing countries. Journal of Animal
Breeding and Genetics 114, 231–238. http://dx.doi.
Köhler-Rollefson, I. (2001). Community based
management of animal genetic resources with
special reference to pastoralists. Proc. Workshop on
Community Based Management of Animal Genetic
Resources. FAO corporate depository, Mbambane,
Swaziland. May 7–11, 2001, pp. 13-25.
Krätli, S. (2015) Valuing variability: New Perspectives
on climate resilient drylands development. IIED.
Edited by de Jode, H.
Krätli S., Kaufmann B., Roba H., Hiernaux P., Li
W., Easdale M., Hülsebusch C. (2015). A House
Full of Trap Doors: Identifying barriers to resilient
drylands in the toolbox of pastoral development. IIED
discussion paper, IIED, London and Edinburgh.
Lentini, P.E., Fischer, J., Gibbons, P., Lindenmayer,
D.B. & Martin, T.G. (2011). Australia’s Stock Route
Network: 1. A review of its values and implications
for future management. Ecological Management &
Restoration 12, 119–127.
Ligios, S., Revilla, R., Nardone, A.,Casu, S. (2005).
Cattle husbandry systems in Mediterranean
mountains: situation and prospects. In: Georgoudis,
A. Rosati, A., Mosconi, C. (eds.). Animal
production and natural resources utilisation in the
Mediterranean mountain areas. EAAP Scientic
Series 115, pp. 375-386.
Lipper, L., Dutilly-Diane, C., McCarthy, N. (2010).
Supplying Carbon Sequestration From West African
Rangelands: Opportunities and Barriers. Rangeland
Ecology & Management 63, 155-166. http://dx.doi.
Llonch, P., Haskell, M .J., Dewhurst, R .J., Turner
, S.P. (2016) Current available strategies to mitigate
greenhouse gas emissions in livestock systems: an
animal welfare perspective. Animal 11, 274 -284.
Manzano, P. (ed.) (2014) Community Based
Adaptation to climate change strengthens
pastoralists’ resilience. Special Issue. JotoAfrika 14,
July 2014.
Manzano, P. (2015a). Transporte de semillas por las
ovejas trashumantes, y sus potenciales implicaciones
en la vegetación. PhD esis, Universidad Autónoma
de Madrid.
Manzano, P. (2015b) Pastoralist Ownership of Rural
Transformation: e adequate path to change.
Development 58 (2/3), 000326-000332. http://rdcu.
Manzano, P. (2016). Case study #12: Improvements
of livestock disease management through enhanced
beef supply chain hazard analysis procedures around
Transfrontier Conservation Areas in Southern Africa.
In: LEAP. Principles for the assessment of livestock
impacts on biodiversity. Livestock Environmental
Assessment and Performance Partnership. FAO,
Rome, Italy, pp. 134-139.
Manzano, P. (2017) Development interventions on
pastoralist areas: a new decision matrix to identify
win-win situations and no-go zones. e Solutions
Journal 9 (3).
Manzano Baena, P. and Casas, R. (2010) Past, present
and future of trashumancia in Spain: nomadism in
a developed country. Pastoralism: Research, Policy
and Practice (Practical Action) 1 (1), 72-90. https://
Manzano, P., Azcárate, F.M., Peco, B. & Malo, J.E.
(2010) Are ecologists blind to small things? e missed
stories on non-tropical seed predation on feces. Oikos
119, 1537-1545.
Manzano, P.; Agarwal, M. (2015) Pastoralist
Participation and Networking in Policy dialogue:
Dimensions and Challenges. Perspectives
18, 1-16.
Manzano, P. & White, S.R. (submitted). Livestock
emissions: Consider correct accounting of alternative
scenarios. Nature Sustainability.
Manzano, P., Malo, J.E., Azcárate, F.M. (in prep).
Can granivorous ants be better dung removers than
beetles? An insight from Mediterranean sheep-grazed
Marinković S. & Karadzić B. (1999) e role of
nomadic farming in the distribution of the grion
vulture (Gyps fulvus) on the Balkan peninsula.
Contributions to the Zoogeography and Ecology of
the Eastern Mediterranean Region 1, 141-152.
Mateo-Tomás P.(2013) e role of extensive
pastoralism in vulture conservation. Proceedings of
the Grion Vulture Conference, 6-8 March 2013,
Limassol, pp. 104-114.
Mathias, E., Mundy, P., Köhler-Rollefson, I. (2010).
Marketing products from local livestock breeds: an
analysis of eight cases. Animal Genetic Resources 47,
40 References
McGahey, D., Davies, J., Hagelberg, N., and
Ouedraogo, R. (2014). Pastoralism and the Green
Economy – a natural nexus? Nairobi: IUCN and
UNEP. x + 58p.
Mikha, M. M., Hergert, G. W., Benjamin, J. G.,
Jabro, J. D., Nielsen, R. A. (2015). Lo ng-Te rm
Manure Impacts on Soil Aggregates and Aggregate-
Associated Carbon and Nitrogen. Soil Science Society
of America Journal 79, 626-636. http://dx.doi.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003).
Ecosystems and Human Well-being. A Framework
for Assessment. Island Press.
Muller, S., Dutoit, T., Alard, D., & Grevilliot, F.
(1998). Restoration and Rehabilitation of Species‐
Rich Grassland Ecosystems in France: a Review.
Restoration Ecology, 6(1), 94-101. http://dx.doi.
Nassef, M., Anderson, S., Hesse, C. (2009).
Pastoralism and climate change. Enabling adaptive
capacity. HPG Commissioned Report, April 2009.
London: ODI.leadmin/user_
Neely, C., Bunning,S., Wilkes, A., (2009). Review
of evidence on dryland pastoral systems and climate
change. Implications and opportunities for mitigation
and adaptation. FAO Land and Water Discussion
Paper 8.
Ní Laoire, C. (2001). A Matter of Life and Death?
Men, Masculinities and Staying ‘Behind’ in Rural
Ireland. Sociologia Ruralis 41, 220-236. http://dx.doi.
Nori, M., Davies, J. (2007). Change of wind or
wind of change? Climate change, adaptation and
pastoralism. e World Initiative for Sustainable
Pastoralism. Nairobi: IUCN.
Nori M., Taylor, M., Sensi, A. (2008). Browsing
on fences: pastoral land rights, livelihoods and
adaptation to climate change. IIED Drylands Series
#148, IIED & ILC, London & Rome. http://pubs.iied.
Orford, K.A., Murray, P.J., Vaughan, I.P. &
Memmott, J. (2016). Modest enhancements to
conventional grassland diversity improve the
provision of pollination services. Journal of Applied
Ecology. http://d
Orgill, S.E., Waters, C.M., Melville, G., Toole, I.,
Alemseged, Y., Smith, W. (2017). Sensitivity of
soil organic carbon to grazing management in the
semi-arid rangelands of south-eastern Australia.
e Rangeland Journal 39, 153-167 http://dx.doi.
Palomares, F., Delibes, M., Revilla, E., Calzada, J. &
Fedriani, J.M. (2001). Spatial ecology of Iberian lynx
and abundance of European rabbits in southwestern
Spain. Wildlife Monographs, pp. 1–36.
Papanastasis, V.P., Bautista, B., Chouvardas, D.,
Mantzanas, K., Papadimitriou, M., Mayor, A.G.,
Koukioumi, P., Papaioannou, A., Vallejo, R.V.
(2017). Comparative assessment of goods and services
provided by grazing regulation and reforestation
in degraded Mediterranean rangelands. Land
Degradation & Development 28, 1178–1187. http://
Peco, B., Sánchez, A.M., Azcárate, F. (2006).
Abandonment in grazing systems: consequences
for vegetation and soil. Agriculture, Ecosystems &
Environment 113, 284–294.
Perea, R.; López-Sánchez, A.; Roig, S. (2016) e use
of shrub cover to preserve Mediterranean oak dehesas:
a comparison between sheep, cattle and wild ungulate
management. Applied Vegetation Science 19, 244–
Peters CJ, Picardy J, Darrouzet-Nardi AF, Wilkins
JL, Grin TS, Fick GW. (2016) Carrying capacity
of U.S. agricultural land: Ten diet scenarios.
Elementa. 4:116.
Pster, S., Boulay, A.-M., Berger, M., Hadjikakou,
M., Motoshita, M., Hess, T., Ridoutt, B., Weinzettel,
J., Scherer, L., Döll, P., Manzardo, A., Núñez, M.,
Verones, F., Humbert, S., Buxmann, K., Harding,
K., Benini, L., Oki, T., Finkbeiner, M., Henderson,
A. (2017). Understanding the LCA and ISO water
footprint: A response to Hoekstra (2016) “A critique on
the water-scarcity weighted water footprint in LCA.
Ecological Indicators 72, 352-359. http://dx.doi.
Pimlin, A. Perrot, C., Parguel, P. (2006). Diversity of
dairy systems and products in France and in Europe:
the assets of less favoured areas. In: R. Rubino, R.,
Sepe, L., Dimitriadou, A., Gibon, A. (eds.). Product
quality based on local resources leading to improved
sustainability. EAAP Scientic Series 118, pp. 293-
Pinilla, V. Ayuda, M.I., Sáez, L.A. (2006). Rural
depopulation in Mediterranean Western Europe: a
case of Aragon. ISBN: 978-84-92582-43-3 http://les/articulof_282_01_DT-
Plieninger, T., Hui, C., Gaertner, M. & Huntsinger L.
(2014) e Impact of Land Abandonment on Species
Richness and Abundance in the Mediterranean Basin:
A Meta-Analysis. PLoS One 9(5): e98355. http://
Powell, J.M., Fernández-Rivera, S., Hiernaux, P.,
Turner, M.D. (1996). Nutrient cycling in integrated
rangeland/cropland systems of the Sahel. Agric.
Syst. 52, 143–170.
Pöyry, J., Luoto, M., Paukkunen, J., Pykälä, J.,
Raatikainen, K. & Kuussaari, M. (2006). Dierent
responses of plants and herbivore insects to a gradient
of vegetation height: An indicator of the vertebrate
grazing intensity and successional age. Oikos, 115,
Pugliese, P., Marie Reine Bteich, M.R., and Lina
Al-Bitar, L. (eds.) (2014), Mediterranean Organic
Agriculture Key features, recent facts, latest gures.
MOAN report 2014 CIHEAM Bari. http://moan.
Pykälä, J. (2003). Eects of restoration with
cattle grazing on plant species composition and
richness of semi-natural grasslands. Biodiversity
& Conservation, 12(11), 2211-2226. http://dx.doi.
Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A., Mosquera-Losada, M.,
Romero-Franco, R., González-Hernández, M.P.,
Villarino-Urtiaga, J.J., 2005. Silvopastoral systems
as a forest re prevention technique. In: Mosquera-
Losada, M.R., McAdam, J., Rigueiro-Rodríguez,
A. (Eds.), Silvopastoralism and Sustainable Land
Management. CAB International, Wallingford,
pp. 380–387.
Rodríguez-Ortega, T. Bernués, A., Olaizola, A.M.,
Brown, M.T. (2017). Does intensication result in
higher eciency and sustainability? An emergy
analysis of Mediterranean sheep-crop farming
systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 144, 171-179.
Röös, E., Patel, M., Spångberg, J., Carlsson, G. &
Rydhmer, L. (2016). Limiting livestock production to
pasture and by-products in a search for sustainable
diets. Food Policy 58, 1-13.
Runo M, Rowe E, Delve RJ, Giller KE (2006)
Nitrogen cycling eciencies through resource-
poor African crop–livestock systems. Agr Ecosyst
Env 112:261-282.
Ruiz Mirazo, J. (2011). Las áreas pasto-
cortafuegos: un sistema silvopastoral para la
prevención de incendios forestales. PhD thesis,
Universidad de Granada.
42 References
Ruiz, J., Herrera, P.M., Barba, R., Busqué, J. (2017).
Denición y caracterización de la extensividad en las
explotaciones ganaderas en España. Ministerio de
Agricultura, Pesca, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente,
Rutsaert, P., Barnett, J., Gaspar, R., Marcu, A.,
Pieniak, Z., Seibt, B., Lima, M.L., Fletcher, D.,
Verbeke, W. (2015). Beyond Information Seeking:
Consumers’ Online Deliberation About the Risks
and Benets of Red Meat. Food Quality and
Preference 39: 191–201.
Schader, C., Muller, A., Scialabba, N.E.-H., Hecht,
J., Isensee, A., Erb, K.-H., Smith, P., Makkar,
H.P.S., Klocke, P., Leiber, F., Schwegler, P., Stolze,
M., Niggli, U. (2015). Impacts of feeding less food-
competing feedstus to livestock on global food system
sustainability. Journal of e Royal Society Interface
12, 20150891.
Schiere J.B., Kater L. (2001). Mixed crop-livestock
farming. A review of traditional technologies based
on literature and eld experiences. FAO Animal
Production & Health paper 152.
Schiere, J.B., Ibrahim, M.N.M., van Keulen. H.
(2002). e role of livestock for sustainability in mixed
farming: Criteria and scenario studies under varying
resource allocation. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 90, 139–
Scholtz, M.M., van Ryssen, J.B.J., Meissner, H.H.,
Laker, M.C. (2013). A South African perspective on
livestock production in relation to greenhouse gases
and water usage. South African Journal of Animal
Science 43 (3), 247-245.
SEO/BirdLife (2017), Prueba de Comercialización.
Productos Natura 2000. http://www.
comercializacion/ Retrieved on 1st May 2017.
Slade, E.M., Roslin, T., Santalahti, M., Bell, T.
(2016a). Disentangling the ‘brown world’ faecal–
detritus interaction web: dung beetle eects on soil
microbial properties. Oikos 125, 629–635. http://
Slade, E.M., Riutta, T., Roslin, T., Tuomisto,
H.L. (2016b). e role of dung beetles in reducing
greenhouse gas emissions from cattle farming.
Scientic Reports. 6, 18140. http://dx.doi.
Średnicka-Tober, D., Barański, M., Seal, C. J.,
Sanderson, R., Benbrook, C., Steinshamn, H.,
Gromadzka-Ostrowska, J., Ewa Rembiałkowska,
E., Skwarło-Sońta, K., Eyre, M., Cozzi, G., Larsen,
M.K., Jordon, T., Niggli, U., Sakowski, T., Calder,
P.C., Burdge, G.C., Sotiraki, S., Stefanakis, A., Yolcu,
H., Stergiadis, S., Eleni Chatzidimitriou, E., Butler,
G., Stewart, G., Leifert, C. (2016a). Composition
dierences between organic and conventional meat:
a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
British Journal of Nutrition 115, 994-1011. http://
Średnicka-Tober, D., Barański, M., Seal, C. J.,
Sanderson, R., Benbrook, C., Steinshamn, H.,
Gromadzka-Ostrowska, J., Ewa Rembiałkowska, E.,
Skwarło-Sońta, K., Eyre, M., Cozzi, G., Larsen, M.K.,
Jordon, T., Niggli, U., Sakowski, T., Calder, P.C.,
Burdge, G.C., Sotiraki, S., Stefanakis, A., Stergiadis,
S., Yolcu, H., Eleni Chatzidimitriou, E., Butler, G.,
Stewart, G., Leifert, C. (2016b). Higher PUFA and
n-3 PUFA, conjugated linoleic acid, α-tocopherol and
iron, but lower iodine and selenium concentrations
in organic milk: a systematic literature review and
meta- and redundancy analyses. British Journal of
Nutrition 115, 1043-1060.
Tennigkeit, T., Wilkes, A. (2008). An assessment of
the potential for carbon nance in rangelands. ICRAF
Working Paper 68, ICRAF, Nairobi. http://www.
orne PJ, Tanner JC. (2002). Livestock and nutrient
cycling in crop-animal systems in Asia. Agricultural
Systems 71, 111–126.
Tilman, D., Clark, M. (2014). Global diets link
environmental sustainability and human health.
Nature 515, 518-522.
Tonelli, M., Verdú, J.R., Zunino, M.E. (2017). Eects
of grazing intensity and the use of veterinary medical
products on dung beetle biodiversity in the sub-
mountainous landscape of Central Italy. PeerJ 5:e2780
UNEP (2016). UNEP/EA.2/Res.24 : Combating
desertication, land degradation and drought and
promoting sustainable pastoralism and rangelands.
United Nations Environment Assembly of the
United Nations Environment Programme. Second
session. Nairobi, 23–27 May 2016. http://wedocs.
Vélez, R. (2010). Prescribed Burning for Improved
Grazing and Social Fire Prevention: the Spanish
EPRIF Programme. In ‘Best Practices of Fire-
Use – Prescribed Burning and Suppression Fire
Programmes in Selected Case-Study Regions in
Europe’. (Eds C Montiel, D Kraus) European Forest
Institute, Research Report 24, pp. 107–122. (Joensuu,
Vigan, A., Lasseur, J., Benoit, M., Mouillot, F.,
Eugène, M., Mansard, L., Vigne, M., Lecomte, P.,
Dutilly, C. (2017). Evaluating livestock mobility as
a strategy for climate change mitigation: Combining
models to address the specicities of pastoral systems.
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 242, 89–
Wagner, T., Kuhndt, M., Lagomarsino, J., Mattar, H.,
(2015) Listening to sharing economy initiatives. htt p://
Wang, Y, Beydoun, M.A. (2009) Meat consumption is
associated with obesity and central obesity among US
adults. International Journal of Obesity 33, 621–628.
Western, D. (1982) e Environment and Ecology
of Pastoralists in Arid Savannas. Development
and Change 13, 183-211. http://dx.doi.
WHO (2015). Global action plan on antimicrobial
resistance. WHO, Geneva.
Willer, H., Lernoud, J. (Eds.) (2017). e World of
Organic Agriculture. Statistics and Emerging Trends
(2017. ) Research Institute of Organic Agriculture
(FiBL), Frick, and IFOAM – Organics International,
Bonn. Version 1.3 of February 20, 2017. http://www.
WISP (2010). Building climate change resilience
for African livestock in sub-Saharan Africa. IUCN
ESARO, Nairobi, viii + 48pp.
Xirouchakis, S. & Nikolakakis, M. (2002).
Conservation implications of the temporal and spatial
distribution of Bearded Vulture Gypaetus barbatus in
Crete. Bird Conservation International 12, 269–280.
44 Breadcrumb
Annex: The Culture
of Pastoralism in the
Photo Credit: Transhumance
of Latxa sheep slicing through
the mountain at Arrizaga
gorge, in the Aralar Range
(Basque Country). © Gema
Arrugaeta, Spain, 2014.
Annex: e Culture of Pastoralism in the Mediterranean
Transhumance in Spain is the living legacy of human ingenuity in taking on the
role of the great herbivores before them. Spain’s natural richness is enhanced by
the livestock activity initiated by Iberian drovers in Neolithic times, who began
to create specic landscapes (such as the dehesas) and also native breeds such as
the Merino sheep. Transhumance has le as its legacy the Drovers’ Roads, the
routes followed by the herds which were rst given legal recognition in the 13th
Century and whose status was re-conrmed in 1995 with the creation of the
National Network of Drovers’ Roads. Unique in the world, in total it stretches
to more than 12,000 km in length and comprises over 400,000 ha of land;
in comparative terms this equates to 161 times the length of the ‘Camino de
Santiago’, with equal potential to attract visitors.
Spain is a good example of a western nation whose history, landscape and culture
have been deeply inuenced by pastoral and transhumant heritage, therefore the
material and immaterial cultural legacy is immense154. As such transhumance
has been ocially declared immaterial cultural heritage by the Spanish
In the same way, the dehesa silvopastoral system, unique to Spain and Portugal,
will in the near future be proposed for World Heritage status within the category
of “cultural landscapes” of UNESCO. It meets ve of the six criteria for cultural
landscapes and all four of the total natural heritage criteria156.
Perhaps one of the most important aspects to address in the Spanish context is to
promote new uses for this heritage, in order to support its protection and build
new economic activities related to it in rural areas. Public participation of the
community and users in these processes will be a way to guarantee the future of
this outstanding and unique cultural legacy.
154 Cruz Sánchez & Escribano Velasco 2013
155 Boletín Ocial del Estado 2017
156 ICOMOS, unpublished.
46 Annex: e Culture of Pastoralism in the Mediterranean
Evidence of domesticated animals in the Greek territory goes back to the seventh
millennium BC; however the appearance of transhumance is still disputed
among scholars157. Certainly though, under Ottoman rule (15th-19th century), a
system of nomadic stock farming was gradually developed, known as the great
tseligata which continued until the 20th century. One factor contributing to the
ourishing of nomadism in that period was the ease of movement for herdsmen
and their ocks as a result of a unied administration under the Ottomans.
e basis of the tseligata system was a highly organised system of collaboration
between the herdsmen, which incorporated many of the basic principles of the
rural cooperative158.
In Greece, transhumance is linked with two separate cultural groups of people:
the Sarakatsani, who had no settled dwellings in either summer or lowland
pastures, and the Vlachs, who created proper villages close to their summering
sites but scattered over the plains in the winter according to availability of
pastures; both groups are largely settled now. It is important to note however,
that before the creation of ethnic states in the 20th century, the herdsmen along
with their ocks, families and belongings were moving freely from place to place
across Greece and the Balkans. is practice has played a particularly signicant
role in the origin and maintenance of lowland – upland interactions, inuencing
the actual character of the landscapes, as we know them today. At the same time,
the realities of pastoral life have given rise to rich cultural traditions reected in
dierent music, customs, clothing, shepherding management, architecture and
Recent decades have seen major changes. Socio-economic reasons such as
technological innovations, EU subsidies and the availability of cheap labour from
newly arrived immigrants have signicantly aected the practice and its cultural
aspects. Notably, the use of four-wheel drive vehicles has allowed transhumant
shepherds to get to their pastures faster, while in many cases the ocks are
moved between the highlands and lowland in large trucks. At the same time,
the lack of nationally designated drover roads presents serious obstacles to the
shepherds that still want to move their ocks on foot. Nevertheless, some aspects
of the hard work involved still remain the same as the sheep still have to be
tended night and day, the shearing, milking, slaughtering and skinning are still
done by hand and in most cases there is no electricity or running water in their
157 Hadjigeorgiou 2011
158 Papageorgiou 1986
Photo Credit: Women
play an important part in
transhumant life working
equally hard with men. is is
Kiki Siafarika, Avdella.
© Stamos Abatis, North
Pindos - Greece, 2014.
48 Annex: e Culture of Pastoralism in the Mediterranean
In Turkey mobile pastoralism is a major traditional practice shaping the
country´s outstanding landscapes where three of the world’s biodiversity
hotspots meet: Mediterranean, Irano-Anatolian and Caucasus159.
e rich ecosystem and habitat diversity has not only produced a considerable
diversity of species but has also shaped the culture of the peoples living there and
vice versa. With its adaptive capacity to spatial and temporal variabilities it is a
unique example of people and nature interaction in Turkey that can be traced
through its great impact on the country´s cultural diversity with the values,
institutions, artifacts/techniques, food, songs, arts and oral literature these
communities have developed.
Despite the fact that mobile pastoralism in Turkey has suered, some
communities still maintain a wisdom, a keen knowledge of the landscapes in
which they move, emerging from thousands of years of accumulated experiences.
e practice in its many dierent forms in Turkey has therefore much to oer
not only for conserving nature but also the cultural diversity and heritage of the
Photo Credit (from le to
right): Two brothers rest
before aernoon of grazing,
Kızılağaç, Turkey.
© Engin Ylmaz
In the evening the women
prepare food around the
open re. © Bari Koca,
Turkey, 2014
50 Annex: e Culture of Pastoralism in the Mediterranean
In Lebanon pastoralism plays an important role in rural community heritage
by sustaining close social and intergenerational relationships and livelihoods.To
ensure the availability of feed between seasons, the herds move in transhumance
between the highlands and the coastal areas. Places like the Bekaa Valley are
important areas for dierent pastoral practices and associated lifestyles and
Pastoralism is also related to the hima, a traditional system of land governance
and natural resource management that can be traced back to the Arabian
Peninsula and early Islamic states. Derived from the ‘Arabic word for
“protection,” the hima originated as a community-based method of safeguarding
water resources and vegetation during times of drought and environmental
One aspect of the hima was that it was similar to an exclosure, thus preventing
grazing during times of ecological stress. Today the hima system has undergone
a revival and now protects wildlife, biodiversity, and natural resources, as well as
facilitating conservation, education, scientic research, recreation, ecotourism,
and land-use management. Transhumant grazing in the area has also increased
the number of habitats that are suitable for plants, reptiles, and insects. In 2013,
the Society for Protection of Nature in Lebanon (SPNL) conducted a quadrant-
based oristic study in Hima Fakiha160, which is situated in the semi-arid
region of the northern Bekaa Valley. e hima was found to have a signicantly
higher number of endemic plants, approximately 1680 plant species, in a region
consisting largely of rangelands stressed by overgrazing. In addition, in the
same hima, a buttery study was undertaken, being a good biological indicator
of ecosystem health. ey are relatively well-researched, easy to identify and
monitor, and popular amongst the local populace. Butteries respond quickly
to changes in land use, including intensication and abandonment, and because
they occur in one or more generations per year, buttery populations can
change rapidly and trends can be detected in a relatively short period of time. In
Hima Fakiha, where grazing persists, about 495 species of butteries have been
detected to feed on a wide variety of the native host plants.
160 Zorkot 2015
Photo Credit (from top to
bottom): Hima Fekha Plant
Guide and Buttery Guide.
© Society for the Protection
of Nature, Lebanon.
Face of the future.
© Asaad Saleh,
Lebanon, 2014.
52 Annex: e Culture of Pastoralism in the Mediterranean
e main characteristic of the organization of nomadic societies in Tunisia
is their tribal reference. Strong socio-cultural and economic elements link
individuals to the family, families to the fraction, and fractions to the tribe.
e rst requirement of belonging to any tribe is respect for the notion that the
honor of the tribe surpasses all individual interests. e second is the existence of
a powerful system of mutual social and economic support among the members
of the tribe. e absence of a strong agricultural, hydraulic and economic
organization would prove disastrous in a dicult climatic and ecological context
(steppe and desert of semi-arid and arid climates). Tribal customs and adaptive
practices of nomadic pastoralism have ensured survival in the toughest of
Community spirit is therefore the key notion to understanding the functioning
of the tribe. Councils of elders take decisions, arbitrate conicts and ensure the
proper functioning of collective life.
Main transhumance routes
Secondary transhumance routes
Main cities along transhumance routes
Secondary cities along transhumance
Photo Credit: A child playing
cowboy with a sheep that has
just been shorn.
© Wassim Ghozlani,
Tataouine-Tunisia, 2014.
54 Annex: e Culture of Pastoralism in the Mediterranean
e diverse practices of mobile pastoralism across the Mediterranean, indeed
across the globe, have strong links with spirituality and religious tradition.
While much more research is required to explore this eld of enquiry, direct
observations conrm that this is the case.
In the most general sense, the practice in itself is a spiritual one. It inspires a
way of life that lends itself to spiritual enquiry. Mostly this is not articulated, nor
acknowledged, nor understood. When pastoralists are asked why they maintain
such a challenging way of life, the answer is oen simply because they love it. It
makes them feel ‘free’. ey have a full connection with the landscape, with the
seasons, with their animals. Freedom, love and connection are all spiritual in
nature, surpassing any particular religious tradition.
In Pablo Dominguez’s161 comparative study of transhumant communities in the
Central Spanish Pyrenees and the High Atlas of Marrakech, an interesting focus
on religious and ritual linkages is presented:
“e spiritual and the immaterial world have always had a fundamental place
in Mediterranean mountain transhumant systems. To portray this, the place of
local saints referring to transhumance and highland pastures is a particularly
sharp example of this. In fact, we generally nd these spaces under the patronage
of mythical gures and sanctities that centre the performance of pastoralist and
transhumant rituals, in order to ensure a complete and balanced management of
the villagers’ common lands.”162
Further, there are many cases where the overlap between mobile pastoral practic-
es and the related routes or landscapes can be seen. For instance in Dehesa de la
Luz, Extremadura, there is an important religious site within the Dehesa land-
scape. Every year it becomes the site of huge celebration when the Virgin of Light
(Luz) comes back to the Dehesa aer nine days in the village of Arroyo de la Luz
– a real crossroads for many of the Spanish canada (drovers’ roads).
e maintenance of mobile pastoralism therefore has great importance not only
for the culture of the regions in which it persists but also for a spirituality that is
arguably the lost key to a more sustainable future.
161 Domínguez 2016
162 ibid.
Photo Credit: Grazing just
before sunset.
© Stamos Abatis, North
Pindos - Greece, 2014.
56 Annex References
Boletín Ocial del Estado (2017). Real Decreto
385/2017, de 8 de abril, por el que se declara la
Trashumancia como Manifestación Representativa
del Patrimonio Cultural Inmaterial. BOE 86,
Cruz Sánchez, P.J., Escribano Velasco, C., (2013)
Patrimonio material e inmaterial de las vías
pecuarias en el entorno de la Cañada de la Plata.
Una Mirada a las manifestaciones culturales d ela
trashumancia tradicional. Junta de Castilla y León.
Domínguez, P. (2016). A Comparative Study of
Two Mediterranean Transhumant Systems and
the Biocultural Diversity Associated with them. In
M. Agnoletti and F. Emanueli (eds.), Biocultural
Diversity in Europe, Environmental History 5,
pp. 105-122. Environmental History series, Vol. 5,
ICOMOS (unpublished). Fundamentos para una
posible inscripción de la dehesa en la lista del
patrimonio mundial de UNESCO. Informe de
ICOMOS España.
Hadjigeorgiou, I. (2011), Past, present and future of
pastoralism in Greece. Pastoralism: Research, Policy
and Practice 1:24.
Papageorgiou, K (1986). Agricultural cooperatives.
Evgenidio Foundation, Athens. (in Greek)
Zorkot , H. A. (2015). A Field Guide to Wildowers
of Hima Fakiha and the Adjoining Region (1st
ed.). Beirut: Society for the Protection of Nature
in Lebanon. Printing Sponsored by the Critical
Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF)
e Mediterranean Consortium for Nature And
Culture is a collective movement to support and
raise awareness for cultural practices that have a
positive impact on biodiversity.
Currently made up of 6 partners, we explore
innovative and alternate ways of approaching
nature conservation, helping to secure a more
sustainable future in the Mediterranean.
Supported By
58 Breadcrumb
© Gema Arrugaeta
... Besides all the difficulties and imperfections of the indigenous cattle farming systems in all three countries, it is important to emphasize that they are based on the rational use of local resources and allow the production of quality food (Manzano & Salguero, 2018). They are also an important part of rural economy especially in areas with strong environmental constraints, while the local breeds selected by the farmers have developed all the necessary traits to cope with them . ...
... Besides all the difficulties and imperfections of the indigenous cattle farming systems in all three countries, it is important to emphasize that they are based on the rational use of local resources and allow the production of quality food (Manzano & Salguero, 2018). They are also an important part of rural economy especially in areas with strong environmental constraints, while the local breeds selected by the farmers have developed all the necessary traits to cope with them . ...
Full-text available
The present work analyzes the diversity of livestock assets and management, in relation tohuman and land assets and its contribution to the household resilience. The analysis conducted on 452family farms surveys in three agro ecological zones of Egypt: the rain fedagro-pastoral zone in the Coastal Zone of Western Desert (CZWD), the hot arid desert oasis in the New valley(NV), and the irrigated hot area of Nile Valley in Upper Egypt (UE). The traditional family farming in Egypt usually includemulti-animal species-herd composed of large ruminants (cattle and/or buffalo) and small ruminants (sheep and/or goats), and eventually camels in desert areas, with backyardpoultry. The diversity of household faming systems was analyzed according to four dimensions, i.e., human and land asset, livestock diversity and household resilience. The cross analysis based on Multiple Factorial Analysis (MFA) shows very close links between land and crop assets, livestock diversity assets and management under different agro-ecological conditions. There is no exclusive link with either groups, but resilience is positioned as a synthesis of different capacities of households to adapt hazards. The perception of adaptive capacity of local breedshighlights the major external constraints in each location. Overall, increase of monetary and food resilience are linked with livestock activity diversification, even with livestock management embedded in the agro-ecological environment and land asset constraints.
... Besides all the difficulties and imperfections of the indigenous cattle farming systems in all three countries, it is important to emphasize that they are based on the rational use of local resources and allow the production of quality food (Manzano & Salguero, 2018). They are also an important part of rural economy especially in areas with strong environmental constraints, while the local breeds selected by the farmers have developed all the necessary traits to cope with them . ...
Full-text available
Indigenous cattle in the Mediterranean are an integral part of rural societies and ecosystems, as well as, a major source of animal products and income. The present article presents the results from 318 questionnaires developed in the BOVISOL project, in indigenous cattle farms in Greece, Algeria and Tunisia. Demographic information on the farmers, details on the farms, as well as a general description of the production systems are presented and discussed. Farmers, in all three countries have high average age, low to average education level and most of them have a successor in the farm. The farm infrastructures as well as the production characteristics are close to the traditional profile and interconnected to the local climatic and social conditions. Additionally, through the answers gathered, it is apparent that the farms have low cooperation and involvement in production recording schemes or conservation programs. The common problems and goals identified in the present work gives the possibilities to find mutual solutions for present of future issues and emphasizes the need to encourage cooperation between farmers in national and international level.
... Besides all the difficulties and imperfections of the indigenous cattle farming systems in all three countries, it is important to emphasize that they are based on the rational use of local resources and allow the production of quality food (Manzano & Salguero, 2018). They are also an important part of rural economy especially in areas with strong environmental constraints, while the local breeds selected by the farmers have developed all the necessary traits to cope with them (FAO, 2015). ...
Scholars have remarked the opportunities that animal-based tourism provides as the channel to boost local communities’ economy and progress while promoting nature conservation efforts. Consumer characteristics and value creation in camel riding tours’ target audience are however underdealt topics in literature. Given the survival of certain local camel breeds is contingent on leisure tourism, we examined the sociological and psychographic attributes which may allow differentiating customers. Nonlinear canonical correlation analysis was used to determine profiles of those tourists engaging in these activities to characterize the most profitable segments of camel rides as a business niche. Our results suggest that if not familiarized with camels and their functionalities, travelers may not intentionally engage in camel-based tourism unless offered the opportunity at holiday destinations. On the contrary, amateur users are familiar with camels and valorize the issuing tour operator performance and general comfort during the encounter as pivotal factors conditioning their overall satisfaction. Hence, it is quite recommendable for tour agencies to include this entertaining recreation in packages to individuals, groups and companies, as well as staff to customize the service to make the user feel satisfied and willing to return again. The sustainable use of canary camels as business motors may provide tangible benefits to locals’ well-being and natural resources management while these animal genetic resources are protected.
... However, behind market regulations, the reduction in meat consumption is a pressing need worldwide, due to its major, negative consequences for land and water use and environmental change [75]. Extensive livestock farming certainly emerges as an alternative to industrial livestock production for its social, environmental and economic contribution in rural areas [76,77], where it leads to the maintenance of multifunctional landscapes [78]. Even more, by strengthening pasture-based livestock systems from the economic, ecological and technological dimensions, we can contribute to the increasing societal and scientific demand towards agroecological transitions of agricultural systems [79]. ...
Full-text available
European traditional cultural landscapes are increasingly modified by rural abandonment and urban growth processes. Acknowledged as of High Nature Value for providing multiple ecosystem services while contributing to human well-being, the future of these social-ecological systems is uncertain. Here we aim to (1) explore dominant land use and cover (LULC) changes linked to extensive livestock farming across an urban-rural gradient defined by a large city (Madrid) over the last three decades; (2) identify and classify the main driving forces shaping these landscape trajectories and; (3) acknowledge the main landscape values for promoting landscape stewardship under participatory governance frameworks. For doing so, we combine mapping analyses (CORINE Land cover) with stakeholder perceptions and positions. Our results show a dual process of progressive abandonment of agroecosystems linked to traditional livestock farming and an ever-increasing urban growth over the last three decades as the most important driving forces. The growing urban sprawl in areas close to Madrid begins to be perceived as problematic for interviewees. The decline of extensive livestock farming in detriment of tourism, particularly evident in rural areas far from Madrid, is perceived as a threat to the cultural heritage and traditions of rural people. This decline is also perceived as a worrying increase of wildfire risk. Stakeholders stressed the need of valuing extensive livestock farming to prevent rural-urban migration, dynamizing rural economies, conserving landscapes and traditions while producing food-quality products. Interviewees advocated for science-based, stakeholder-inclusive and participatory landscape planning and co-management, leading to more context-specific, regionalized policymaking.
... 11 Beyond its economic value, extensive pastoralism also provides significant environmental, social, and cultural contributions. 12 Pastoralist systems are often present in harsh and highly variable regions (Figure 1). These social-ecological systems (SES) have risen and fallen since their origins millennia ago, but the last decades have witnessed an increasing frequency and magnitude of sudden livestock production losses. ...
Full-text available
Pastoralism is globally significant in social, environmental, and economic terms. However, it experiences crises rooted in misconceptions and poor interdisciplinary understanding, while being largely overlooked in international sustainability forums and agendas. Here, we propose a transdisciplinary research approach to understand pastoralist transitions using (1) social, economic, and environmental dimensions, (2) diverse geographic contexts and scales to capture emerging properties, allowing for cross-system comparisons, and (3) timescales from the distant past to the present. We provide specific guidelines to develop indicators for this approach, within a social-ecological resilience analytical framework to understand change. Distinct systems undergo similar transitions over time, crossing critical thresholds and then either collapsing or recovering. Such an integrated view of multidimensional interactions improves understanding of possible tipping points, thereby supporting better-informed decision making. The need for a paradigm shift in pastoralism science and policy is pressing. This research approach, including participatory methods, can provide the solutions urgently needed.
Full-text available
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization recently declared transhumance pastoralism as an Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity. The notion of heritage seeks to recognize the culture behind the seasonal grazing movements along herding routes, between distant and dissimilar ecosystems. The pastoral families move with their herds from pasturelands used during the winter (winter-lands) to areas pastured during the summer (summer-lands). Whereas this is a key step towards the recognition of the cultural dimension associated to this ancient practice, a relevant feature of transhumance pastoralism is its strong linkage with environmental dynamics. This activity developed in a spatiotemporal and co-evolutionary trajectory, which gave rise to a pastoral territory. A territory is the union or linkage of a meaning with a specific place, that is, the space that is appropriated and valued, both symbolically and instrumentally, by human groups. Hence, the pastoral territory represents the socio-ecological system that integrates a pastoral-based community with the natural environment that it inhabits. We propose a co-evolutionary approach to analyzing some key attributes of transhumant pastoralism, which modulate the socio-ecological interdependence. Based on a study case from Northwest Patagonia, Argentina, we identified and characterized seven attributes: (I) mobility, (II) connectivity, (III) temporal synchrony, (IV) local interdependence, (V) local ecological knowledge, (VI) adaptive capacity legacy, and (VII) mixture of land tenure. We discuss these features as examples that represent keystone socio-ecological attributes for the recognition of transhumant pastoral territories as a biocultural heritage.
Full-text available
Mountain grazing systems, based since ancient times on common land, are finding it increasingly challenging to ensure their economic viability. Although marginal in productive terms, these systems are high-value natural areas that provide multiple benefits for society (e.g. biodiversity and ecosystem services). They are usually studied from an institutional or local perspective, but little is known about how mountain common land interacts with policies at a higher level, e.g. the Common Agriculture Policy (CAP) in Europe. This study assesses the contribution of the commons to the persistence of mountain sheep grazing systems in Europe under the CAP. To that end, we analyse economic and land use data on 20 farms in the mountain common grazing lands of Aralar (Basque Country, northern Spain). We find that CAP payments associated with common land account for 42% of net margin while the resources extracted from common grazing lands in the summer months provide on average 30% of annual energy requirements, which equates to 22.5% of farms’ net margins. We conclude that under the current CAP the common land can play a key role in securing additional resources for the small farmers who engage in low-input traditional management practices that sustain these valuable grazing systems. The way in which existing intertwined institutions adapt to the emergence of new, higher level conditions such as the CAP will determine the future of ever-changing mountain commons.
Full-text available
Animal source foods are evolutionarily appropriate foods for humans. It is therefore remarkable that they are now presented by some as unhealthy, unsustainable, and unethical, particularly in the urban West. The benefits of consuming them are nonetheless substantial, as they offer a wide spectrum of nutrients that are needed for cell and tissue development, function, and survival. They play a role in proper physical and cognitive development of infants, children, and adolescents, and help promote maintenance of physical function with ageing. While high-red meat consumption in the West is associated with several forms of chronic disease, these associations remain uncertain in other cultural contexts or when consumption is part of wholesome diets. Besides health concerns, there is also widespread anxiety about the environmental impacts of animal source foods. Although several production methods are detrimental (intensive cropping for feed, overgrazing, deforestation, water pollution, etc.) and require substantial mitigation, damaging impacts are not intrinsic to animal husbandry. When well-managed, livestock farming contributes to ecosystem management and soil health, while delivering high-quality foodstuffs through the upcycling of resources that are otherwise non-suitable for food production, making use of marginal land and inedible materials (forage, by-products, etc.), integrating livestock and crop farming where possible has the potential to benefit plant food production through enhanced nutrient recycling, while minimising external input needs such as fertilisers and pesticides. Moreover, the impacts on land use, water wastage, and greenhouse gas emissions are highly contextual, and their estimation is often erroneous due to a reductionist use of metrics. Similarly, whether animal husbandry is ethical or not depends on practical specificities, not on the fact that animals are involved. Such discussions also need to factor in that animal husbandry plays an important role in culture, societal well-being, food security, and the provision of livelihoods. We seize this opportunity to argue for less preconceived assumptions about alleged effects of animal source foods on the health of the planet and the humans and animals involved, for less top-down planning based on isolated metrics or (Western) technocratic perspectives, and for more holistic and circumstantial approaches to the food system.
Full-text available
In the western Algerian steppe, the public authorities have carried out actions aimed at rural development (agricultural development programs) and combating desertification (grazing reserves) to counter the significant and rapid loss of vegetation cover of pastures by overgrazing, and the consequent impacts on local livelihoods. In the Rogassa area, these actions have impacted land tenure and the ancestral and collective way of land use and access. These changes have caused transformations in lifestyle and pasture management. This research aims to characterize how such changes are affecting local pastoralists and what their perceptions are about them. A selective sampling of 150 agropastoral households was carried out by interviewing their heads, analyzing socioeconomic, land tenure and government perception variables. Most agropastoralists access land under tribal tenure, conditioned by local social structures. Pastures are prevailingly perceived by pastoralists as insufficient, and the perception of grazing reserves is largely negative. Pastoralists are worried about land degradation and declining grazing lands, and are looking for solutions and alternatives. However, state interventions have been uncoordinated and have not considered their customary land rights. The generalized awareness of environmental deterioration points to the need for better communication and intervention strategies to be developed by authorities in the future that involve the inhabitants of these lands. Keywords: rangeland access; land degradation; agropastoralists; land tenure; pastoral society; livelihood transformation; development programs
Full-text available
Land abandonment is common in the Mediterranean Basin, a global biodiversity hotspot, but little is known about its impacts on biodiversity. To upscale existing case-study insights to the Pan-Mediterranean level, we conducted a meta-analysis of the effects of land abandonment on plant and animal species richness and abundance in agroforestry, arable land, pastures, and permanent crops of the Mediterranean Basin. In particular, we investigated (1) which taxonomic groups (arthropods, birds, lichen, vascular plants) are more affected by land abandonment; (2) at which spatial and temporal scales the effect of land abandonment on species richness and abundance is pronounced; (3) whether previous land use and current protected area status affect the magnitude of changes in the number and abundance of species; and (4) how prevailing landforms and climate modify the impacts of land abandonment. After identifying 1240 potential studies, 154 cases from 51 studies that offered comparisons of species richness and abundance and had results relevant to our four areas of investigation were selected for meta-analysis. Results are that land abandonment showed slightly increased (effect size = 0.2109, P,0.0001) plant and animal species richness and abundance overall, though results were heterogeneous, with differences in effect size between taxa, spatial-temporal scales, land uses, landforms, and climate. In conclusion, there is no ''one-size-fits-all'' conservation approach that applies to the diverse contexts of land abandonment in the Mediterranean Basin. Instead, conservation policies should strive to increase awareness of this heterogeneity and the potential trade-offs after abandonment. The strong role of factors at the farm and landscape scales that was revealed by the analysis indicates that purposeful management at these scales can have a powerful impact on biodiversity.
Full-text available
Interventions in pastoralist areas have tended to be poorly guided because of lack of understanding of pastoralist societies and their conditioning factors. In this paper I propose a decision matrix that helps valuing the traditional knowledge of such communities in designing interventions better fitted to local population needs. Available at
Full-text available
Successful coexistence between large carnivores and humans is conditional upon effective mitigation of the impact of these species on humans, such as through livestock depredation. It is therefore essential for conservation practitioners, carnivore managing authorities, or livestock owners to know the effectiveness of interventions intended to reduce livestock predation by large carnivores. We reviewed the scientific literature (1990–2016), searching for evidence of the effectiveness of interventions. We found experimental and quasi-experimental studies were rare within the field, and only 21 studies applied a case-control study design (3.7% of reviewed publications). We used a relative risk ratio to evaluate the studied interventions: changing livestock type, keeping livestock in enclosures, guarding or livestock guarding dogs, predator removal, using shock collars on carnivores, sterilizing carnivores, and using visual or auditory deterrents to frighten carnivores. Although there was a general lack of scientific evidence of the effectiveness of any of these interventions, some interventions reduced the risk of depredation whereas other interventions did not result in reduced depredation. We urge managers and stakeholders to move towards an evidence-based large carnivore management practice and researchers to conduct studies of intervention effectiveness with a randomized case-control design combined with systematic reviewing to evaluate the evidence.
Full-text available
Many previous studies that investigated the role of ruminants as seed dispersers were based exclusively on dung analyses and may have underestimated an important fraction of the total number of dispersed seeds. Moreover, this fraction of seeds should correspond to plant species with particular fruit and seed traits (eg large linear dimensions) differing from those of plant species dispersed exclusively or mostly through defecation. Importantly, the seeds of some species are unlikely to survive passage through the ruminant lower digestive tract so that spitting from the cud may represent their only, or at least their main, dispersal mechanism. It is therefore essential to investigate the effectiveness of this overlooked mechanism of seed dispersal in various habitats and systems.
Full-text available
Carbon storage by ecosystems is valuable for climate protection. Biodiversity conservation may help increase carbon storage, but the value of this influence has been difficult to assess. We use plant, soil, and ecosystem carbon storage data from two grassland biodiversity experiments to show that greater species richness increases economic value: Increasing species richness from 1 to 10 had twice the economic value of increasing species richness from 1 to 2. The marginal value of each additional species declined as species accumulated, reflecting the nonlinear relationship between species richness and plant biomass production. Our demonstration of the economic value of biodiversity for enhancing carbon storage provides a foundation for assessing the value of biodiversity for decisions about land management. Combining carbon storage with other ecosystem services affected by biodiversity may well enhance the economic arguments for conservation even further.
Full-text available
The alliance between the natural and social sciences has proven to be a successful analytical approach to understand and conserve ecosystems worldwide, while seeing humans as key agents within these (1971 Man and the Biosphere Programme, 1972 Stockholm Declaration, 1992 Rio Conference). In this context, authors from various areas of expertise have stressed the importance of recognizing the inextricable link between biological and cultural diversity and the need to raise awareness of these interactions for global sustainability. Despite scientific research repeatedly insisting on the importance of such a link, there remains a gap calling to highlight the concrete ways in which this diversity of long-held biocultural relations manifests and is generated. In fact, many of the works demonstrating the aforementioned bond are focused on the bioecological consequences of human diversity. At the same time, when they introduce a more sociocultural focus, they most often make linguistic indexes, their main measure for culture and/or use quantitative and macro-geographical approaches. In this sense, the general trend of this type of works, although always valuable, seems somewhat reductionist or incomplete. A less hard science and more detailed ethnographic-humanist analysis of this diversity and its groundings are still lacking. In order to address the exposed problem, I will present my preliminary works comparing agro-pastoral transhumant systems of the High Atlas of Marrakech and the Central Spanish Pyrenees. The ultimate goal is to push for an increasingly holistic approach to biocultural analysis including the humanities to a greater extent, and a broader spectrum of the social sciences.
These proceedings contain 123 papers which are divided into 5 main sessions. The first session includes the characterization of silvopastoral systems in a global context while the second session deals with the effects of the management tools on the productivity and quality of silvopastoral systems. The ecological implications of the silvopastoral systems is discussed in the third session, with emphasis on the biodiversity and sustainable management aspects. The fourth session, on the other hand, examines the main economical, social and cultural aspects of silvopastoral systems. Lastly, the fifth session evaluates the perspectives of these systems in a global and European context.
Pastoral farming systems have always adapted to the seasonal availability of forage resources and climate variability by moving animals. However, the role of animal mobility as a possible mitigating strategy in response to climate change has not been clearly documented. To understand this role, we investigated (i) the major methodological challenges linked to the diversity of grazing areas and other forage resources exploited by these systems and enteric emissions of methane; (ii) the impacts of grazing practices (carbon sequestration/emission) on soil and biomass carbon fluxes. We developed an approach based on two existing models (OSTRAL: Outil de Simulation du TRoupeau ovin ALlaitant and CASA: Carnegie Ames Stanford Approach) that we adapted and used in combination. This approach was applied to three French Mediterranean sheep and crop farming systems with different degrees of flock mobility (sedentary, single transhumance and double transhumance). The preliminary results produced by the whole farm model OSTRAL showed that two systems (sedentary and double transhumance) causing low carbon emissions. In the sedentary system, higher animal productivity offsets the increase in GHG emissions (in CO 2 eq) caused by feed production. In the pastoral system, grazing reduced total GHG emissions (in CO 2 eq). The CASA model proved to be useful to simulate the carbon balance under dynamic land cover in natural environments, whether used for grazing or not. This model can help assess the impact of grazing practices and carbon fluxes in systems linked to natural environments. The results of the first application showed that seasonal mobility of livestock increases the contribution of rangeland to feeding systems and improves the non-renewable energy balance of the system. It is thus extremely important to include the specificities of animals grazing in rangelands outside the structural limits of the farm when evaluating GHG emissions.
Pastoralist systems are complex production systems able to thrive in areas with scarce and unpredictable plant productivity. However, they have been negatively impacted by poorly designed development interventions and negative media portrayals. Investment guided by careful understanding and consultation with local communities can take advantage of improvement in technologies and markets to achieve a fairer and balanced improvement in pastoralist livelihoods. Read-only version available at