Background
Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is an effective tool for detecting and staging prostate cancer (PCa), guiding interventional therapy, and monitoring PCa treatment outcomes. MRI‐guided focal laser ablation (FLA) therapy is an alternative, minimally invasive treatment method to conventional therapies, which has been demonstrated to control low‐grade, localized PCa while preserving patient
... [Show full abstract] quality of life. The therapeutic success of FLA depends on the accurate placement of needles for adequate delivery of ablative energy to the target lesion. We previously developed an MR‐compatible mechatronic system for prostate FLA needle guidance and validated its performance in open‐air and clinical 3T in‐bore experiments using virtual targets.
Purpose
To develop a robust MRI‐to‐mechatronic system registration method and evaluate its in‐bore MR‐guided needle delivery accuracy in tissue‐mimicking prostate phantoms.
Methods
The improved registration multifiducial assembly houses thirty‐six aqueous gadolinium‐filled spheres distributed over a 7.3 × 7.3 × 5.2 cm volume. MRI‐guided needle guidance accuracy was quantified in agar‐based tissue‐mimicking prostate phantoms on trajectories (N = 44) to virtual targets covering the mechatronic system's range of motion. 3T gradient‐echo recalled (GRE) MRI images were acquired after needle insertions to each target, and the air‐filled needle tracks were segmented. Needle guidance error was measured as the shortest Euclidean distance between the target point and the segmented needle trajectory, and angular error was measured as the angle between the targeted trajectory and the segmented needle trajectory. These measurements were made using both the previously designed four‐sphere registration fiducial assembly on trajectories (N = 7) and compared with the improved multifiducial assembly using a Mann–Whitney U test.
Results
The median needle guidance error of the system using the improved registration fiducial assembly at a depth of 10 cm was 1.02 mm with an interquartile range (IQR) of 0.42–2.94 mm. The upper limit of the one‐sided 95% prediction interval of needle guidance error was 4.13 mm. The median (IQR) angular error was 0.0097 rad (0.0057–0.015 rad) with a one‐sided 95% prediction interval upper limit of 0.022 rad. The median (IQR) positioning error using the previous four‐sphere registration fiducial assembly was 1.87 mm (1.77–2.14 mm). This was found to be significantly different (p = 0.0012) from the median (IQR) positioning error of 0.28 mm (0.14–0.95 mm) using the new registration fiducial assembly on the same trajectories. No significant difference was detected between the medians of the angular errors (p = 0.26).
Conclusion
This is the first study presenting an improved registration method and validation in tissue‐mimicking phantoms of our remotely actuated MR‐compatible mechatronic system for delivery of prostate FLA needles. Accounting for the effects of needle deflection, the system was demonstrated to be capable of needle delivery with an error of 4.13 mm or less in 95% of cases under ideal conditions, which is a statistically significant improvement over the previous method. The system will next be validated in a clinical setting.
