Content uploaded by Sumaya Farooq
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Sumaya Farooq on Mar 31, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
Antioxidant Activity of Different Forms of Green Tea:
Loose Leaf, Bagged and Matcha
SUMAYA FAROOQ and AMIT SEHGAL*
Department of Zoology, School of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Lovely Professional University,
Phagwara 144411, India.
Abstract
Green tea is commercially available in three forms: loose leaf, bagged and
powdered. The objective of this study was to compare the radical scavenging
capacity of different forms of green tea like loose leaf (3), bagged (2) and
powdered matcha (2) of various brands. The green tea forms were prepared
at 95-100 °C for 5 min., to mimic conditions usually used for tea preparations
at home. The comparison of combined IC50 values of different green tea forms
(loose leaf, bagged and matcha) showed no significant difference in their radical
scavenging activity except bagged tea that exhibited slightly more DPPH radical
scavenging potential as compared to matcha. Individually, the Bud white loose
leaf demonstrated highest antioxidant activity followed by Laplant bag, Lipton
bag, Laplant loose, Gourmet matcha, Wow matcha and Lipton loose. These
findings revealed that on the basis of form, it may not be possible to generalize
which form of tea whether loose leaf, bagged or matcha, is more effective in
scavenging free radicals.
Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science
Journal Website:www.foodandnutritionjournal.org
ISSN: 2347-467X, Vol. 06, No. (1) 2018, Pg.
CONTACT Amit Sehgal sehgalamitres@gmail.com Department of Zoology, School of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Lovely
Professional University, Phagwara 144411, India.
© 2018 The Author(s). Published by Enviro Research Publishers
This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted NonCommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in
any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
To link to this article:
Article History
Received: 13 November
2017
Accepted: 20 March
2018
Keywords
Antioxidant,
Camellia sinensis,
Free radical,
Green tea,
Matcha.
Introduction
Green tea is obtained from the dried leaves of tea plant
Camellia sinensis and is one of the drinks gaining
popularity throughout the world1. It is manufactured
from newly picked leaves that are exposed to heat,
and then pan fried or steamed prior to rolling or
shaping and drying2. It is widely consumed, due to its
refreshing taste, aroma and various other properties
like antioxidant, anticarcinogenic, antimutagenic
and antihypertensive3-10. All the above mentioned
properties are mainly attributed to high polyphenolic
content present in the green tea11. The catechins
constitute the major part of the polyphenolic content
in green tea, main catechins and its derivatives
present are: (-) – epigallocatechin (EGC), (-) -
epigallocatechin 3- gallate (EGCG), (-) - epicatechin
gallate (ECG), (-) - gallocatechin gallate (GCG) and
(-) – epicatechin (EC)12-15. It is reported that EGCG is
one of the major and biologically effective catechin
of green tea16.
2
Green tea is commercially available in the market
in three forms: Loose leaf, bagged and powdered
(matcha). There have been few comparative
studies conducted on different forms of tea and
their association with antioxidant potential. It
was demonstrated that antioxidant capability of
different forms of tea (bagged and loose leaf) was
similar at 80 0C/5'17 but another study showed
that maximum extraction efficiency for green tea
bioactive compounds also depends on steeping
time at constant temperature for different tea types
i.e. 5' (powder), 15' (bagged) and 30' (loose leaf) at
80 0C18. The powdered form of green tea revealed
greater scavenging effect on the production of
reactive oxygen species (ROS) in vitro compared
with the same amount of loose leaf tea19. Matcha is
a powdered form of green tea that is produced from
shade grown tea leaves that are briefly steamed after
harvesting and then grinded in a stone mill19,20. It is
found to be effective in quenching reactive oxygen
species, inhibition of blood glucose accumulation
and stimulation of lipid metabolism21. The aim of
this study was to assess and compare the effect
of different forms of green tea such as loose leaf
(Bud white, Lipton and Laplant loose), bagged
(Lipton and Laplant bag) and powdered (Gourmet
and Wow matcha) on their antioxidant potential
at conditions usually used for tea preparations at
home.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and Reagents
Methanol, 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,
2'- azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)
(ABTS). All these chemical are of analytical grade
and procured from Himedia (Mumbai, India).
Sample Preparation
Different forms of green tea such as loose [Bud white
(BW), Lipton loose (LL), and Laplant loose (LAL)],
bagged [Lipton bag (LB) and Laplant bag (LB)] and
matcha [Gourmet matcha (GM) and Wow matcha
(WM)] of various brands were evaluated in this
study. Various tea samples were prepared by adding
0.2 g of tea in 10 ml of distilled water and steeped
for 5 minutes at 95-100 0C. The hot water samples
were filtered using Whatman’s filter paper and the
filtrate was used for further investigations22.
Antioxidant Potential
DPPH Free Radical Scavenging Assay
The scavenging activity of different tea extracts
against stable DPPH free radical was examined
spectrophotometrically. DPPH solution (0.3 mM)
was prepared by dissolving DPPH in methanol.
The optical density (OD) of DPPH solution was set
between 0.8-1 by diluting it with 50% methanol.
Different concentrations of tea extracts were added
separately to 2 ml of DPPH solution23. After 30
minutes of incubation, the discoloration of the
purple to yellow color was observed at 520 nm.
Methanol was taken as blank and 2 ml of DPPH
solution was taken as control. The test was carried
out in triplicates. Radical scavenging potential was
determined applying the following relationship:
% Scavenging activity = A520(c) – A520(s) / A520(c)
x 100
Where, A(c) = absorbance of control and
A(s) = absorbance of sample.
ABTS Free Radical Scavenging Activity
This assay depends on the ability of different
substances to scavenge ABTS [2, 2'- azino-bis
(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)]. The radical
cation was generated by reacting ABTS stock
solution (7 mM) with potassium persulfate (2.4
mM) in 1: 1 ratio. The reaction mixture was kept in
dark for 16 hours at room temperature. The optical
density (OD) of ABTS solution was set between
0.8-1 by diluting it with 50% methanol. Different
concentrations of tea extracts were added to every
2 ml of ABTS solution24. After 30 minutes of
incubation, absorbance of respective samples was
taken at 745 nm. The scavenging potential of the test
samples was determined by following equation:
% Scavenging activity = A745(c) – A745(s)/A745(c) × 100,
Where, A(c) = absorbance of control and
A(s) = absorbance of sample.
Statistical Analysis
The data was expressed as mean ± S.D for
triplicate readings. The inter group comparisons
were performed by one way analysis of variance
(ANOVA) succeded by Tukey’s honestly significant
difference test using SPSS software (version 18).
3
The observations were considered statistically
significant when the p-values are 0.05 or less.
Results and Discussion
Antioxidant activity of different forms of green tea
was determined using DPPH and ABTS tests as
shown in Figure 1 and 2.
DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity
The DPPH free radical scavenging activity of
different forms of green tea were ranked upon IC50
values as followed: Lipton loose, LL (30.48 µg/ml) >
Wow matcha, WM (29.93 µg/ml) > Gourmet matcha,
GM (27.55 µg/ml) > Laplant loose, LAL (26.26 µg/
ml) > Lipton bag, LB (24.42 µg/ml) > Laplant bag,
LAB (20.38 µg/ml) > Bud white loose leaf, BW
(18.93 µg/ml) as depicted in Figure 1. Lesser the
IC50 value, greater is the antioxidant potential. It was
observed that BW and LAB are significantly more
effective in scavenging DPPH radical followed by LB,
LAL, GM, WM and LL.
Fig. 1: DPPH radical scavenging activity of different brands and forms of green tea (mean ± sd,
n=3). Different alphabets symbolize significant variation between different tea brands. Bud white
(BW), Gourmet matcha (GM), Laplant bag (LAB), Laplant loose (LAL), Lipton bag (LB), Lipton
loose (LL) and Wow matcha (WM) are various brands of different forms of green tea
ABTS Radical Scavenging Activity
The results obtained from the ABTS test shown
in Figure 2. The IC50 values of different forms of
green tea based upon their scavenging activity
are as followed: LL (13.62 µg/ml) > WM (11.95
µg/ml) > GM (11.44 µg/ml) > LAL (11.16 µg/ml) >
LB (10.89 µg/ml) > LAB (9.75 µg/ml) > BW loose
leaf (8.84 µg/ml). It was demonstrated that BW was
significantly more effective in radical scavenging
activity followed by LAB, LB, LAL, GM, WM and
LL.
Fig. 2: ABTS radical scavenging activity of different brands and forms of green tea (mean ± sd,
n=3). Different alphabets symbolize significant variation between different tea brands. Bud white
(BW), Gourmet matcha (GM), Laplant bag (LAB), Laplant loose (LAL), Lipton bag (LB), Lipton
loose (LL) and Wow matcha (WM) are various brands of different forms of green tea
4
The fluctuations in antioxidant activity of green
tea from various brands were reported. This is in
agreement with previous studies, which concluded
that phytochemical content of tea is affected by the
cultivation conditions, horticultural practices, cultivar,
age of leaf, grade, geographical area, storaging and
type of processing25-27.
The combined IC50 values of different forms of green
tea such as loose (Bud white, Lipton and Laplant
loose), bagged (Lipton and Laplant bag) and matcha
(Wow and Gourmet matcha) showed no statistical
significant difference in both the antioxidant assays
except in case of DPPH radical scavenging, bagged
tea demonstrated a small but significant difference
in radical quenching ability as compared to matcha
as depicted in Table 1.
Table 1: Average values of combined IC50 (µg/ml) of loose, bagged and
powdered form of green tea (mean ± sd, n=3)
Green tea form DPPH ABTS
Bag tea (Lipton and Laplant bag) 22.40 ± 2.26 10.32 ± 0.77
Loose tea (Bud white green tea, 25.45 ± 5.12 11.21 ± 2.10
Lipton and Laplant loose)
Matcha tea (Wow and Gourmet matcha) 28.74 ± 1.57 * 11.70 ± 0.65
2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2, 2' azino- bis (3- ethylbenzothiazoline-6-
sulfonic acid) (ABTS). * Represents a significant difference as compared to
bagged tea at p ≤ .05
A previous study on different forms of green tea
such as powdered (Matcha), loose leaf (Kukicha,
Gyokuro, Longjing, Sencha J, Bancha, Yunnan,
Sencha CH, Gunpowder and Rose of the Orient) and
bagged (Twinings of London, Taylors of Harrogate
and Franck) demonstrated that antioxidant potential
of different forms of tea varies with extraction time
and temperature. The same study also showed that
antioxidant potential and total phenolic content was
found to be maximum for all green tea forms at 100
0C/3', the bagged tea possess highest scavenging
activity followed by powdered and then loose leaf
tea18. In vivo studies demonstrated that regular
consumption of green tea exerts protection against
benzo(a)pyrene mediated toxicity in mice model28,29.
In the present work, no significant difference was
found between the radical quenching ability of
different forms of tea except bagged tea, which
exhibited slightly more scavenging potential in case
of DPPH radical. Interestingly, earlier studies also
revealed that antioxidant capability of different forms
of green tea were similar for steeping time of 5' and
10' at 80 0C17-18. It was also suggested that high
water temperature and short steeping time is best
for extraction of tea bioactive compounds18,30,31. Our
investigation was concentrated on shor t steeping
time (5') and high water temperature (95-100 0C)
as these conditions mimic the household method
of tea preparation.
Conclusion
The study on the antioxidant activity of different
forms of commercially available green tea like loose
(Bud white, Lipton loose and Laplant loose),
bag (Lipton and Laplant bag) and matcha
(Gourmet matcha and Wow matcha) prepared at
95-100 0C and steeped for 5 min, showed no
significant difference in the IC50 value against DPPH
and ABTS radical except bagged tea that displayed
slightly more DPPH radical scavenging potential
in comparison to matcha. But individually, BW
(loose leaf) showed the highest antioxidant activity
followed by LAB (bagged), LB (bagged), LAL
(loose leaf), GM (powder), WM (powder) and LL
(loose leaf). Moreover, this study reported it might not
be possible to rank the radical scavenging potential
on the basis of green tea form.
5
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the financial support by Lovely
Professional University to do the necessary research
work and to use departmental facilities.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial
or otherwise.
References
1. Yu Y, Deng Y, Lu B. M, Liu Y. X, Li J, Bao
J. K. Green tea catechins: a fresh flavor to
anticancer therapy. Apoptosis; 19(1): 1-18:
(2014).
2. Santana-Rios G, Orner G. A, Amantana
A, Provost C, Wu S.Y, Dashwood R. H.
Potent antimutagenic activity of white tea in
comparison with green tea in the Salmonella
assay. Mutation Research; 495(1): 61–74:
(2001).
3. Inoue M, Tajima K, Hirose K, Hamajima N,
Takezaki T, Kuroishi T, Tominaga S. Tea and
coffee consumption and the risk of digestive
tract cancers: data from a comparative case-
referent study in Japan. Cancer Causes and
Control; 9(2): 209-216: (1998).
4. Skrzydlewsja E, Augustyniak A, Ostrowska
J, Luczaj W, Tarasiuk E. Green tea protection
against aging – induced oxidative stress.
Free Radical Biology and Medicine; 33: 555:
(2002).
5. Chung F. L, Schwartz j, Herzog C. R, Yang
Y. M. Tea and cancer prevention: studies in
animals and humans. Journal of Nutrition;
133 (10): 3268S-3274S: (2003).
6. Lambert J. D, Yang C. S. Mechanisms of
cancer prevention by tea constituents. Journal
of Nutrition; 133 (10): 3262–3267: (2003).
7. Kumar M, Sharma V. L, Sehgal A, Jain M.
Protective effects of green and white tea
against benzo (a) pyrene induced oxidative
stress and DNA damage in murine model.
Nutrition Cancer; 64 (2): 300-306: (2012).
8. Mittal A, Pate M. S, Wylie R. C, Tollesfsbol
T. O, Katiyar S. K. EGCG down regulates
telomerase in human breast carcinoma
MCF-7 cells, leading to suppression of
cell viability and induction of apoptosis.
International Journal of Oncology; 24(3):
703–710: (2004).
9. Negishi H, Xu J. W, Ikeda K, Njelekela M, Nara
Y, Yamory Y. Black and green tea polyphenols
attenuate blood pressure increases in stroke-
prone spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Journal of Nutrition; 134 (1): 38–42: (2004).
10. Yang J, Meyers K. J, Van der Heide J, Liu R.
H. Varietal differences in phenolic content
and antioxidant and antiproliferative activities
of onions. Journal of Agriculture and Food
Chemistry; 52 (22): 6787-6793: (2004).
11. Hsu Y. W, Tsai C. F, Chen W. K, Huang C. F,
Yen C. C. A subacute toxicity evaluation of
green tea (Camellia sinensis) extract in mice.
Food Chemistry and Toxicology; 49(10): 2624-
2630: (2011).
12. Wang H, Provan G. J, Helliwell K. HPLC
determination of catechins in tea leaves and
tea extracts using relative response factors.
Food Chemistry; 81(2): 307–312: (2003).
13. Williamson G, Manach C. Bioavailability
and bioefficacy of polyphenols in humans. II.
Review of 93 intervention studies. American
Journal Clinical Nutrition; 81(1): 243S–55S:
(2005).
14. Khan N, Mukhtar H. Tea polyphenols for
health promotion. Life Sciences; 81(7):
519–533: (2007).
15. Yang C. S, Lambert J. D, Sang S. Antioxidative
and anticarcinogenic activities of tea
polyphenols. Archives of Toxicology; 83 (1):
11–21: (2009).
16. Yang C. S, Hong J. Prevention of chronic
diseases by tea: possible mechanisms and
human relevance. Annual Review of Nutrition;
33: 161–181: (2013).
17. Rusak G, Komes D, Likic S, Horzic D, Kovac
M. Phenolic content and antioxidative capacity
of green and white tea extracts depending on
extraction conditions and the solvent used.
Food Chemistry; 110(4): 852–858: (2008).
18. Komes D, Horzic D, Belscak A, Ganic K. K,
Vulic I. Green tea preparation and its influence
6
on the content of bioactive compounds. Food
Research International; 43(1): 167-176:
(2010).
19. Fujioka K, Iwamoto T, Shima H, Tomaru K,
Saito H, Ohtsuka M, Yoshidome A, Kawamura
Y, Manome Y. The powdering process with a
set of ceramic mills for green tea promoted
catechin extraction and the ROS inhibition
effect. Molecular; 21(4): 474: (2016).
20. Yamabe N, Kang K. S, Hur J. M, Yokozawa T.
Matcha, a powdered green tea, ameliorates
the progression of renal and hepatic damage
in type 2 diabetic OLETF rats. Journal of
Medicinal Food; 12(4): 714-721: (2009).
21. Xu P, Ying L, Hong G, Wang Y. The effects of
the aqueous extract and residue of matcha
on the antioxidant status and lipid and
glucose levels in mice fed a high-fat diet. Food
Function; 7(1): 294-300: (2016).
22. Tsai P. J, Tsai T. H, Yu C. H, Ho S. C.
Comparison of NO - scavenging and NO-
suppressing activities of different herbal teas
with those of green tea. Food Chemistry;
103(1): 181-187: (2007).
23. Mensor L.L, Menezes F.S, Leitao G.G, Reis
A.S, Santos T.C.D, Coube C.S. Screening of
Brazilian plant extracts for antioxidant activity
by the use of DPPH free radical method.
Phytotherapy Research; 15(2): 127-130:
(2001).
24. Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala
A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C. Antioxidant activity
applying an improved ABTS radical cation
decolorization assay. Free Radical Biology
and Medicine; 26(9): 1231-1237: (1999).
25. Nicoli M. C, Anese M, Parpinel M, Franceschi
S, Lerici C.R. Loss and/or formation of
antioxidants during food processing and
storage. Cancer Letters; 114(1-2): 71–74:
(1997).
26. Vinson J. A, Dabbagh Y. A. Tea phenols:
Antioxidant effectiveness of teas, tea
components, tea fractions and their binding
with lipoproteins. Nutrition Research; 18(6):
1067–1075: (1998).
27. Damiani E, Bacchetti T, Padella L, Tiano
L, Carloni P. Antioxidant activity of different
white teas: Comparison of hot and cold tea
infusions. Journal of Food Composition and
Analysis; 33(1): 59-66: (2014).
28. Kumar M, Jain M, Sehgal A, Sharma V.L.
Modulation of CYP1A1, CYP1B1 and DNA
adducts level by green and white tea in Balb/c
mice. Food and chemical toxicology; 50(12):
4375-4381: (2012a).
29. Kumar M, Sharma V.L, Sehgal A, Jain
M. Protective effects of green and white
tea against benzo (a) pyrene induced
oxidative stress and DNA damage in murine
model. Nutrition and cancer; 64(2): 300-306
(2012b).
30. Friedman M, Kim S. Y, Lee S. J, Han G. P,
Han J. S, Lee K. R, Kozukue N. Distribution
of catechins, theaflavines, caffeine, and
theobromine in 77 teas consumed in the
United States. Journal of Food Science; 70(9):
550-559: (2005).
31. Perva-UzunalicaL A, Skerget M, Knez Z,
Weinreich B, Otto F, Gruner S. Extraction of
active ingredients from green tea (Camellia
sinensis): Extraction efficiency of major
catechins and caffeine. Food Chemistry;
96(4): 597–605: (2006).