ArticlePDF Available

Cardiovascular Reactivity During Marital Conflict in Laboratory and Naturalistic Settings: Differential Associations with Relationship and Individual Functioning Across Contexts

Authors:

Abstract

Cardiovascular reactivity during spousal conflict is considered to be one of the main pathways for relationship distress to impact physical, mental, and relationship health. However, the magnitude of association between cardiovascular reactivity during laboratory marital conflict and relationship functioning is small and inconsistent given the scope of its importance in theoretical models of intimate relationships. This study tests the possibility that cardiovascular data collected in laboratory settings downwardly bias the magnitude of these associations when compared to measures obtained in naturalistic settings. Ambulatory cardiovascular reactivity data were collected from 20 couples during two relationship conflicts in a research laboratory, two planned relationship conflicts at couples' homes, and two spontaneous relationship conflicts during couples' daily lives. Associations between self-report measures of relationship functioning, individual functioning, and cardiovascular reactivity across settings are tested using multilevel models. Cardiovascular reactivity was significantly larger during planned and spontaneous relationship conflicts in naturalistic settings than during planned relationship conflicts in the laboratory. Similarly, associations with relationship and individual functioning variables were statistically significantly larger for cardiovascular data collected in naturalistic settings than the same data collected in the laboratory. Our findings suggest that cardiovascular reactivity during spousal conflict in naturalistic settings is statistically significantly different from that elicited in laboratory settings both in magnitude and in the pattern of associations with a wide range of inter- and intrapersonal variables. These differences in findings across laboratory and naturalistic physiological responses highlight the value of testing physiological phenomena across interaction contexts in romantic relationships.
Cardiovascular Reactivity During Marital Conflict in
Laboratory and Naturalistic Settings: Differential
Associations with Relationship and Individual
Functioning Across Contexts
BRIAN R. W. BAUCOM*
KATHERINE J. W. BAUCOM*
JASARA N. HOGAN*
ALEXANDER O. CRENSHAW*
STACIA V. BOURNE*
SHEILA E. CROWELL*
PANAYIOTIS GEORGIOU
MATTHEW S. GOODWIN
Cardiovascular reactivity during spousal conflict is considered to be one of the main path-
ways for relationship distress to impact physical, mental, and relationship health. However,
the magnitude of association between cardiovascular reactivity during laboratory marital con-
flict and relationship functioning is small and inconsistent given the scope of its importance in
theoretical models of intimate relationships. This study tests the possibility that cardiovascu-
lar data collected in laboratory settings downwardly bias the magnitude of these associations
when compared to measures obtained in naturalistic settings. Ambulatory cardiovascular
reactivity data were collected from 20 couples during two relationship conflicts in a research
laboratory, two planned relationship conflicts at couples’ homes, and two spontaneous relation-
ship conflicts during couples’ daily lives. Associations between self-report measures of relation-
ship functioning, individual functioning, and cardiovascular reactivity across settings are
tested using multilevel models. Cardiovascular reactivity was significantly larger during
planned and spontaneous relationship conflicts in naturalistic settings than during planned
relationship conflicts in the laboratory. Similarly, associations with relationship and individ-
ual functioning variables were statistically significantly larger for cardiovascular data col-
lected in naturalistic settings than the same data collected in the laboratory. Our findings
suggest that cardiovascular reactivity during spousal conflict in naturalistic settings is statis-
tically significantly different from that elicited in laboratory settings both in magnitude and in
the pattern of associations with a wide range of inter- and intrapersonal variables. These dif-
ferences in findings across laboratory and naturalistic physiological responses highlight the
value of testing physiological phenomena across interaction contexts in romantic relationships.
Keywords: Heart Rate Reactivity; Romantic Relationships; Marital Conflict
Fam Proc x:1–17, 2018
*Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Department of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Brian R. W. Baucom, Department of
Psychology, University of Utah, 380 South 1350 East, BEHS 502, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.
E-mail: brian.baucom@psych.utah.edu.
This manuscript was supported in part by start-up funding from the University of Utah and a Vice
President for Research Seed Grant from the University of Utah awarded to Brian Baucom.
1
Family Process, Vol. x, No. x, 2018 ©2018 Family Process Institute
doi: 10.1111/famp.12353
Cardiovascular reactivity is one of the major pathways by which marital conflict is
thought to impact overall relationship functioning, mental health, and physical well-
being (e.g., Robles & Kiecolt-Glaser, 2003; Whisman & Uebelacker, 2003). For example,
faster heart rate (HR) during couple conflict is associated with lower levels of concurrent
relationship satisfaction and greater longitudinal decline in relationship satisfaction (e.g.,
Levenson & Gottman, 1985), higher levels of negative communication behaviors (e.g.,
Newton & Sanford, 2003), and increased risk for hypertension and cardiovascular disease
(e.g., Robles & Kiecolt-Glaser, 2003). These effects are generally understood to occur due
to distress that partners experience during stressful couple interactions (e.g., Robles &
Kiecolt-Glaser, 2003). However, empirical evidence has thus far failed to support the theo-
rized magnitude of association between conflict-related cardiovascular reactivity and rela-
tionship functioning. For example, Robles and colleagues (Robles, Slatcher, Trombello, &
McGinn, 2014) reported meta-analytic effect sizes of r=.10, .18, and .18 (ps<.001)
for associations between relationship satisfaction and HR, diastolic blood pressure (DBP),
and systolic blood pressure (SBP) reactivity, respectively.
Existing research on cardiovascular reactivity during marital conflict is primarily
based on physiological data collected in laboratory settings while spouses discuss an area
of disagreement in their relationship (Robles et al., 2014). This methodology grew out of
a behavior analytic tradition that emphasized the utility of directly observing spouses’
behavior during arguments recorded in laboratory settings (for a review see Heyman,
2001). However, empirical evidence suggests that while conflict behavior enacted in a
laboratory is generally representative of how spouses typically behave, it tends to be less
negative and more positive than conflict that occurs outside of a laboratory (e.g., at
home; Gottman & Krokoff, 1989). Romantic relationship researchers have frequently
explained this finding as reflecting a social desirability effect wherein spouses do not
want to behave badly when being recorded (e.g., Heyman, 2001). While researchers have
not viewed this behavioral discrepancy as an impediment to studying marital conflict in
the laboratory generally, it may have a more pernicious effect when one seeks to identify
representative psychophysiological processes associated with spousal conflict in natural-
istic settings.
Additional concern about the generalizability of laboratory-based psychophysiological
reactivity during marital conflict arises from the literature examining the consistency of
an individual’s cardiovascular reactivity during stress tasks across time and place. The
fields of health psychology and behavioral medicine have long been concerned with the
consistency of an individual’s physiological reactivity to stressors because stable individ-
ual differences in physiological reactivity are a key component of stress-related process
models of disease. Early research into the stability of physiological reactivity to stress,
and cardiovascular reactivity specifically, found that within-person correlations between
cardiovascular reactivity during repeated laboratory stressors varies considerably from
small (e.g., r=.15; Smith & O’Keeffe, 1988) to large (r=.68; Gerin et al., 1998). Larger
correlations typically emerge between cardiovascular reactivity during identical stress
tasks performed on different occasions than cardiovascular reactivity during different
tasks performed either on the same or different occasions.
Conversely, varying the context or location of a stress task has been associated with
lower within-person correlations in cardiovascular reactivity relative to correlations that
emerge for stress tasks that occur in the same place or similar settings. For example,
Gerin et al. (1998) measured three indices of cardiovascular reactivityHR,
1
DBP, and
SBPduring a serial subtraction task performed in the laboratory, a classroom, and
1
Correlations between measures of HR reactivity are not reported because they were all very small, and
study authors suggest that they are unreliable because of measurement imprecision.
www.FamilyProcess.org
2
/
FAMILY PROCESS
participants’ homes. Reactivity scores were larger, though not statistically significantly
so, in naturalistic settings than in laboratory settings. Furthermore, within-person corre-
lations between (1) laboratory and classroom and (2) laboratory and home blood pressure
reactivity (average r=.37) were smaller than those observed between classroom and
home (average r=.51), which were in turn smaller than those observed between repeated
laboratory stressors (average r=.65). Study authors interpreted these findings to indicate
that correlations between repeated measurements of cardiovascular reactivity are highest
when comparing measures obtained under similar circumstances (i.e., laboratory vs. natu-
ralistic) even if the actual location varies.
As may be expected from variability in the magnitude and rank ordering of cardiovascu-
lar reactivity across settings, the predictive utility of cardiovascular measures obtained in
different settings is also widely variable. A prime example of this phenomenon is research
examining the association between hypertension and risk for cardiovascular outcomes.
Individuals who exhibit hypertension (i.e., elevated SBP) in both a clinic setting and dur-
ing daily life are at significantly greater risk for cerebrovascular and coronary events rela-
tive to individuals who exhibit hypertension only in a clinic setting (e.g., Khattar, Senior,
& Lahiri, 1998). Such “white coat” hypertension findings have been interpreted as evi-
dence that SBP can be artificially elevated due to the stress of being in a clinic setting,
rather than a true index of overall health. Extending this phenomenon to physiological
assessments of marital conflict in the laboratory invites the possibility that cardiovascular
reactivity in the laboratory may also be less strongly related to individual and relationship
functioning than would be observed in the real world.
One way spouses can behave less negatively in the laboratory than in more naturalistic
environments is to inhibit impulses to engage in negative behaviors. Such a process could
be described as “editing” from a relationship science perspective (Gottman, Notarius,
Gonso, & Markman, 1976) or as “suppression” from an emotion regulation perspective
(e.g., Gross & Levenson, 1993). Editing refers to refraining from engaging in negative
behaviors and is viewed as a relationship enhancing process (Gottman et al., 1976), while
suppression refers to inhibiting emotional expression and is linked to poorer interpersonal
functioning (e.g., Gross & John, 2003). Of relevance to this study, editing should lead to
lower cardiovascular reactivity during relationship conflict to the extent that it reduces
overall level of negative behavior (e.g., Gottman & Krokoff, 1989), whereas suppression
typically (e.g., Butler et al., 2003), but not always (e.g., Butler, Gross, & Barnard, 2014),
leads to higher levels of cardiovascular reactivity.
Building on the theory and findings presented above, the aims of this study were two-
fold. First, we sought to test mean level differences in cardiovascular reactivity during
repeated marital conflict that occurs in and outside of a laboratory setting. Second, we
sought to evaluate the magnitude of associations between individual and relationship
functioning variables and cardiovascular reactivity during marital conflicts across labora-
tory and naturalistic settings. Consistent with the general pattern of mean level differ-
ences in cardiovascular reactivity observed in stress tasks completed in laboratory and
naturalistic settings (e.g., Gerin et al., 1998), we hypothesized that cardiovascular reactiv-
ity occurring in the real-world environment would be larger in magnitude than cardiovas-
cular reactivity elicited in the laboratory. We also hypothesized that cardiovascular
reactivity in naturalistic settings would be more strongly related to individual and rela-
tionship functioning variables relative to cardiovascular reactivity recorded in the labora-
tory. Finally, exploratory analyses were conducted to examine differences in the
magnitude and strength of associations involving cardiovascular reactivity during
planned and spontaneous marital conflicts that took place in naturalistic settings (i.e., the
home).
Fam. Proc., Vol. x, xxxx, 2018
BAUCOM ET AL.
/
3
METHODS
Participants
Participants were 20 married, heterosexual, community couples (N=40 individuals)
recruited for a study of couple communication. Inclusion criteria included being legally
married for at least 1 year, living within 20 miles of the University, both spouses being
between 18 and 65 years of age, reliable access to the Internet throughout the day, and
ability to speak fluent English. Exclusion criteria included self-reports of moderate to sev-
ere physical aggression assessed using the Conflict Tactics Scale-Revised (Straus, Hamby,
Boney-McCoy, & Sugarman, 1996), history of medical conditions that affect the cardiovas-
cular system (e.g., Coronary Artery Disease), current or previous medication use associ-
ated with cardiovascular disease (e.g., angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors) or
current medication use that affects cardiovascular functioning (e.g., Beta-blockers), cur-
rent use of tobacco products, consuming an average of more than 10 alcoholic beverages
per week, the wife being pregnant, and the presence of other family members (e.g., chil-
dren or parents) or individuals (e.g., tenants or friends) living in the couple’s home and
sharing the same living space. Finally, one spouse was required to report a score of 18 or
less on the Couple Satisfaction Inventory, 4-item version (CSI4; Funk & Rogge, 2007) dur-
ing the screening assessment to increase the likelihood of spontaneous conflict occurring
during the week of daily data collection (described below). A score of 18 on the CSI4 is
approximately 0.5 SD below the maximum possible score of 21 based on established norms
for the scale (SD =4.7, Funk & Rogge, 2007).
Participants ranged from 22 to 64 years old, with a mean age for men of 29.3 (SD =7.8)
years and a mean age for women of 28.1 (SD =9.0) years. They were, on average, college
educated and earned a median annual household income of $32,400. Spouses largely self-
identified as Caucasian (80%), with 12.5% Asian or Pacific Islander, and 7.5% “Other.”
Self-reported religious identity was 40% Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
(LDS), 20% Atheist, 17.5% Spiritual/Agnostic, 5% Non-LDS Christian, and 17.5% chose
not to answer.
Procedures
Couples completed a 3- to 4-hour laboratory assessment that included self-report ques-
tionnaires, physiological baselines, and four videotaped discussions. After consent,
spouses were outfitted with physiological recording equipment that continuously recorded
HR (described below) and then completed two 5-minute resting physiological baselines;
one resting baseline was collected while spouses were in the same room and the other was
collected while spouses were in separate rooms. The order of the two resting baselines was
randomized and counterbalanced. While continuing to wear physiological recording equip-
ment, spouses then completed a battery of self-report questionnaires that took approxi-
mately 4590 minutes followed by four videotaped conversations consisting of a: (1) 5-
minute events of the day conversation; (2) 7-minutes relationship history conversation; and
(34) two 10-minutes relationship conflict discussions. Each spouse determined the topic
for one of the two relationship conflict discussions; the order of which spouse’s topic was
discussed first was randomized and counterbalanced. In addition, all spouses completed
the events of the day conversation first and the order of remaining types of discussions
(i.e., relationship history vs. relationship conflict) were randomized and counterbalanced.
Following completion of the laboratory procedures, participants completed 67 days of
data collection during their daily lives. Data collection included continuous measurement
of HR during all waking hours collected using the same equipment as used to collect HR in
the laboratory as well as completion of daily diaries twice a day. Daily diaries assessed the
www.FamilyProcess.org
4
/
FAMILY PROCESS
beginning and ending time of interpersonal conflict (including conflict with the spouse) and
self-reported relationship functioning, mood, and stress, as well as physiological covariates
(e.g., timing and duration of eating, drinking, and exercise); daily diaries were completed
between 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. and between 8:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. each day.
On the final day of data collection, participants were asked to spend the day with their
spouse and to generate a continuous audio recording as well as a videotaped session
repeating the two conflict discussions they had during the laboratory assessment. Partici-
pants were provided with a video-recorder, given a written reminder of the conflict topics
discussed during the laboratory assessment, and asked to discuss the same two areas of
conflict in reverse order. For example, if the wife’s topic was discussed first during the lab-
oratory assessment, the husband’s topic was discussed first at home. The order of which
spouse’s topic was discussed first was counterbalanced between laboratory and home set-
tings to minimize any potential order effects. Participants were also asked to sit in an
arrangement as similar as possible to the session in the laboratory, follow the same set of
instructions as the laboratory conflict (e.g., discuss the same topic for 10 minutes, do not
get up and move around, etc.), and video-record the entirety of their discussions. Finally,
participants were provided with a digital timer to help them know when 10 minutes had
elapsed. All procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Univer-
sity of Utah.
Heart rate data for this study were based on the average of the two resting baselines,
the two 10-minutes relationship conflict discussions from the laboratory assessment, the
two 10-minutes relationship conflict discussions participants video-recorded in their
homes, and the first 10 minutes of the first two spontaneous relationship conflicts partici-
pants reported in their daily diaries.
2
We selected these periods of measurement for analy-
sis because they maximize the similarity of the stressors by indexing the first 10 minutes
of relationship conflict in all instances and included up to two assessments of conflict in
each interaction context.
3
HR during the two resting baselines were averaged to improve
stability of the estimate by including a maximum amount of data; this decision was judged
to be reasonable given that HR values were highly correlated across the two baselines,
r=.93, p<.001. All self-report measures used in our analyses were collected during the
laboratory assessment.
Measures
Heart rate reactivity
Continuous HR data during the laboratory assessment and daily life portions of the
study were collected using ambulatory Actiheart biosensors (CamNtech Ltd U.K., 2014).
The Actiheart is a two-lead, miniaturized biosensor validated against gold standard clini-
cal/laboratory (3-lead, medical grade electrocardiogram [ECG] recordings) and ambulatory
(e.g., Holter monitor) equipment at rest (Brage, Brage, Franks, Ekelund, & Wareham,
2005; Kristiansen et al., 2011), while exercising (Brage et al., 2005), and during activities
of daily living (Kristiansen et al., 2011). The biosensor connects to standard ECG elec-
trodes placed at midline and left ventral positions of V4. Waveform data were sampled at
2
As expected, not every couple reported having a spontaneous conflict. Twelve couples reported having
at least one spontaneous conflict during the week of daily data collection. HR data from the planned home
conflicts in two couples were missing because of equipment malfunction. In addition, one couple opted not
to complete the daily data collection procedures; data for planned and spontaneous naturalistic conflict
were not collected for this couple.
3
Including multiple measurements of physiological reactivity across contexts has been shown to increase
the stability of reactivity within and across contexts and is the currently recommended method for studies
comparing reactivity across contexts (e.g., Kamarck, Debski, & Manuck, 2000).
Fam. Proc., Vol. x, xxxx, 2018
BAUCOM ET AL.
/
5
128 Hz and processed in real-time to generate 15-seconds epochs of HR values, which were
manually inspected for outliers and poor signal quality prior to analysis. Standard regres-
sion diagnostics were used to test for outliers, and signal quality was assessed using the
percent of missing data for each epoch provided by the Actiheart software. Signal quality
was considered to be acceptable if 10% or fewer data points were missing in any epoch. No
HR values were identified as outliers or poor quality using these methods.
To account for baseline differences in cardiovascular functioning across settings, aver-
age HR during the two resting baselines was subtracted from the average HR during all
relationship conflicts prior to analysis to create change scores. We decided to use the labo-
ratory baseline to calculate heart rate reactivity (HRR) in all relationship conflicts because
there are no currently established methods for selecting baselines for naturally occurring
stressors, and cardiovascular baselines have been shown to be stable across laboratory
and naturalistic settings (e.g., average within-subject correlation: for SBP and DPB,
r=.73; Gerin et al., 1998; for HR, SBP, and DPB, r=.70; Cohen et al., 2000). While this
decision makes interpretation of cardiovascular reactivity scores during the naturalistic
stressors less precise, it allowed HRR values across settings to be maximally comparable
to one another because they were all calculated relative to the same resting baseline
value.
Relationship functioning variables
Relationship satisfaction was assessed using the total score on the Couples Satisfaction
Index, 4-item version (CSI4; Funk & Rogge, 2007), where higher scores indicate greater
relationship satisfaction. Perceived emotional flooding during relationship conflict was
assessed using the total score on the 10-item Flooding questionnaire (Gottman, 1999),
where higher scores indicate feeling more overwhelmed by emotion during relationship
conflict.
Individual functioning variables
Emotion dysregulation was assessed using the total score on the 36-item Difficulties in
Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS; Gratz & Roemer, 2004), where higher scores indicate
greater emotion dysregulation. Emotion regulation strategies were assessed using the
Reappraisal (six items) and Suppression (four items) scales of the Emotion Regulation
Questionnaire (Gross & John, 2003), where higher scores on both scales indicate a stron-
ger tendency to use that emotion regulation strategy. Psychological distress was assessed
using the total score on the 21-item version of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale
(DASS; Antony, Bieling, Cox, Enns, & Swinson, 1998), where higher scores indicate
greater psychological distress. Positive and negative mood were assessed using the Posi-
tive (10 items) and Negative (10 items) scales of the 20-item version of the Positive and
Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988), where higher scores
indicate a stronger general experience of the respective mood.
Body Mass Index
Body Mass Index was computed as BMI =703 *weight in lb./height in inches
2
. Height
was measured using a stadiometer, and weight was measured using a beam scale.
RESULTS
Descriptive Statistics
Table 1 presents descriptive statistics for and correlations between all study vari-
ables. Of particular note, HRR during laboratory conflict and during planned conflict at
www.FamilyProcess.org
6
/
FAMILY PROCESS
TABLE 1
Descriptive Statistics for and Correlations Between All Study Variables
Variable
Correlations
123 4 5 6789101112
1
2 .70***
3.17 .34
4.05 .29 .07
5.04 .20 .66** .14
6.01 .06 .44* .55*** .38*
7.22 .21 .31 .26 .38* .23
8 .22 .30 .05 .22 .22 .54* .02
9.08 .07 .45* .42** .05 .41** .09 .21
10 .12 .21 .40* .47** .08 .35* .39* .10 .19
11 .02 .02 .19 .57*** .00 .49* .14 .27 .58*** .31
12 .34* .03 .20 .05 .08 .08 .09 .19 .04 .20 .19
Mean 0.44 8.17 9.05 17.09 1.29 74.18 32.80 13.91 20.87 38.02 19.70 26.21
SD 6.24 9.87 8.16 3.19 9.33 16.94 4.96 5.49 13.57 5.67 6.39 5.25
Alpha ——.92 .86 .89 .71 .78 .89 .83 .85
Notes. 1HRR
lab
;2HRR
at-home planned
;3HRR
at-home spontaneous
;4CSI; 5flooding; 6DERS; 7reappraisal; 8suppression; 9DASS; 10PANAS
positive; 11PANAS negative; 12BMI.
*p<.05; **p<.01; ***p<.001.
Fam. Proc., Vol. x, xxxx, 2018
BAUCOM ET AL.
/
7
TABLE 2
Heart Rate Reactivity in the This Study, Other Studies of Marital Conflict, and Studies of Other Social Stressors
This study Other studies of marital conflict Trier studies
Laboratory Homeplanned Homespontaneous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Mean 0.44 8.17 9.05 3.71 2.45 1.37 1.21 2.2 3.6 30.63 19.47
Minimum 11.16 11.54 14.64 20.85 —————— —
Maximum 16.43 33.86 31.16 23.05 —————— —
SD 6.43 9.65 8.98 4.23 ————0.18 ——
Note. 1Gottman et al. (1995); 2Levenson and Gottman (1985); 3Levenson et al. (1994); 4Denton, Burleson, Hobbs, Von Stein, and Rodriguez
(2001); 5Nealey-Moore et al. (2007); 6Smith et al. (2009); 7Ditzen et al. (2007); 8Larson et al. (2001).
www.FamilyProcess.org
8
/
FAMILY PROCESS
home was statistically significantly and positively associated (r=.7, p<.001). How-
ever, correlations between HRR during laboratory conflict and spontaneous conflict at
home and between planned and spontaneous conflict at home were nonsignificant
(ps>.05).
To better contextualize mean levels of HRR presented in Tables 1 and 2 presents
descriptive statistics from other published studies of laboratory marital conflict that pro-
vide descriptive statistics for HRR and of the Trier Social Stress Task (TSST; Kirschbaum
et al., 1993), considered to be a gold standard laboratory social stress task that reliably
provokes a cardiovascular response (Larson, Ader, & Moynihan, 2001). Descriptive statis-
tics for the TSST are taken from a meta-analysis of the TSST (Larson et al., 2001) and
from the only existing study of the TSST that recruited couples and reported HRR (Ditzen
et al., 2007). The mean level of HRR during laboratory conflict observed in this study was
somewhat lower than, though within 1 SD of, HRR reported in other studies of marital
conflict. In addition, the minimum and maximum levels of HRR obtained in this study
were consistent with those in the only study that reported these values (Gottman, Jacob-
son, Rushe, & Shortt, 1995). Mean levels of HRR during planned and spontaneous conflict
in this study were also between mean HRR values reported in previous studies of labora-
tory marital conflict and laboratory studies of the TSST (Ditzen et al., 2007; Gottman
et al., 1995; Larson et al., 2001; Levenson, Carstensen, & Gottman, 1994; Levenson &
Gottman, 1985; Nealey-Moore, Smith, Uchino, Hawkins, & Olson-Cerny, 2007; Smith
et al., 2009). Finally, maximum HRR values during marital conflict in naturalistic set-
tings in this study were consistent with mean HRR values during TSST reported in Ditzen
et al. (2007). Taken together, the consistency of HRR values in this study and those
reported in previous work on social stress indicates that HRR during laboratory and natu-
ralistic conflicts is consistent with values that would be expected based on similar previous
work.
Differences in the Magnitude of HRR Across Settings
A 3-level, multilevel model (MLM) was used to test differences in the magnitude of
HRR during conversations in the laboratory, planned conversations at home, and sponta-
neous conflicts outside of the laboratory, where HRR was regressed onto dummy-coded
variables indicating planned conversations at home (0 =laboratory conflict, 1 =planned
conversations at home) and spontaneous conflicts outside of the laboratory (0 =laboratory
conflict, 1 =spontaneous conflict outside of the laboratory), an effect-coded spouse vari-
able (0.5 =husband, 0.5 =wife), and grand-mean centered BMI as a covariate,
4
as illus-
trated by the following series of equations:
Level-1: YðHRRÞijk ¼p0jk þp1jk ðPlannedijkÞþp2jk ðSpontaneousijk Þþeijk
Level-2:p0jk ¼b00kþb01kðSpousejkÞþb02kðBMIjk Þþr0jk
for i¼1;2:pijk ¼bi0kþbi1kðSpousejkÞþbi2kðBMIjk Þ
Level-3: b00k¼c000 þu00k
for i¼0to2;j¼0;1:bijk ¼cij0
where iindexes conversations, jindexes spouses, and kindexes couples.
4
BMI was included in models to statistically control for variability in baseline heart rate associated with
obesity in young adults (e.g., Rossi et al., 2015).
Fam. Proc., Vol. x, xxxx, 2018
BAUCOM ET AL.
/
9
Consistent with our hypotheses, HRR during planned conflicts and spontaneous con-
flicts outside of the laboratory were statistically significantly greater than HRR during
laboratory conflicts (B=8.18, p<.001; B=8.14, p<.001, respectively). HRR was not sta-
tistically significantly different during planned conflicts outside of the laboratory and
spontaneous conflicts outside of the laboratory (B=.04, p>.50). As such, we refer to con-
flict in the naturalistic setting as “naturalistic conflict” below.
Differences in the Strength of Association with HRR Across Settings
The 3-level MLM used to test differences in the magnitude of HRR was expanded by
adding predictors at levels 2 and 3 to test differences in the strength of association with
cardiovascular reactivity across settings (represented by the cross-level interactions
between predictor and planned/spontaneous dummy-coded variables
5
) as illustrated by
the following series of equations:
Level-1: YðHRRÞijk ¼p0jk þp1jk ðPlannedijkÞþp2jk ðSpontaneousijk Þþeijk
Level-2:p0jk ¼b00kþb01kðSpousejkÞþb02kðBMIjkÞþb03kðPredictorcouple centered;jkÞþr0jk
fori¼1;2:pijk ¼bi0kþbi1kðSpousejkÞþbi2kðBMIjkÞþbi3kðPredictorcouple centered;jkÞ
Level-3: b00k¼c000 þc001 ðPredictorgrand centered;jkÞþu00k
for i¼1;2;j¼0:bijk ¼cij0þci01 ðPredictorgrand centered;jkÞ
for i¼0to2;j¼1;2;3:bijk ¼cij0
where iindexes conversations, jindexes spouses, and kindexes couples. Separate models
were run for each variable resulting in eight total models.
Again consistent with our hypotheses, there were statistically significant interactions
between measurement context and most predictors in predicting HRR; differences in the
strength of associations between HRR during laboratory conflict and HRR during natural-
istic conflict emerged for relationship satisfaction, flooding, suppression, difficulties with
emotion regulation, positive affect, and negative affect (all ps<.034); trends for differ-
ences in the strength of associations emerged for psychological distress (see Table 3). In
all cases, associations between HRR and predictor variables were larger in magnitude for
HRR during naturalistic conflict than during laboratory conflict. In addition, decomposing
these interactions revealed that simple slopes for the effects of naturalistic conflict HRR
were statistically significant in eight of nine interactions (and 10 of 13 statistically signifi-
cant interactions and nonsignificant, trend-level interactions considered jointly), indicat-
ing that HRR measured in naturalistic contexts was significantly associated with most
expected predictors. None of the associations between any predictor variable and HRR
during laboratory conflict (i.e., c
001
and c
031
) were statistically significant, indicating HRR
measured in the laboratory context was not significantly associated with expected
predictors.
5
The coefficients for these cross-level interactions indicate the magnitude and significance of the fixed
effect regression coefficients in the planned/spontaneous at-home relative to the same association in the
laboratory conflict. For example, a significant cross-level interaction between a couple centered predictor
and the dummy code for planned at home conflict (b
13k
) would indicate that the association between the
predictor and HRR was significantly different for HRR during planned laboratory conflict and planned at-
home conflict; the sign of this interaction coefficient indicates the relative magnitude of the association
across settings. If the interaction term was positive, it would indicate that the association between the pre-
dictor and HRR was more positive/less negative for planned conflict at home relative to planned conflict in
the laboratory.
www.FamilyProcess.org
10
/
FAMILY PROCESS
TABLE 3
Parameter Estimates of Multilevel Models Regressing HRR onto Relationship Functioning, Emotion Regulation, Psychological Well-Being, and Mood Variables
Variable 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Predictor
Intercept 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44
Predictor
Between-couple
0.15 0.03 0.25 0.53 0.02 0.05 0.21 0.14
Predictor
Within-couple
0.12 0.96 0.32 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.37 0.05
At-home planned 8.18*** 11.12*** 8.15*** 8.39*** 8.20*** 8.11*** 8.42*** 8.62*** 8.28***
At-home planned 9Predictor
Between-couple
2.35** 0.2 0.37 0.67* 0.01 0.1 0.49
0.47
At-home planned 9Predictor
Within-couple
0.16 1.02 0.26 0.44 0.23* 0.16 0.43 0.27
At-home spontaneous 8.14*** 8.6*** 8.27*** 7.97*** 8.37*** 7.07*** 9.9*** 7.37*** 6.63***
At-home spontaneous 9Predictor
Between-couple
0.21 0.4*** 0.13 0.31 0.43*** 0.53
0.41 1.14***
At-home spontaneous 9Predictor
Within-couple
0.75 1.64* 0.24 0.39 0.04 0.19
0.95*** 0.54*
Simple slopes
a
Between-couple
At-home planned 2.50** —— 1.20** ——0.71* 0.34
At-home spontaneous —— 0.36** —— 0.41*** 0.56
1.02*
Within-couple
At-home planned —————0.24* ———
At-home spontaneous ——0.68 ———0.21* 0.58* 0.49*
Variance components
Level-1 33.29 32.00 30.09 32.48 31.18 27.07 36.03 28.78 29.88
Level-2 13.41*** 10.56*** 13.45*** 12.65*** 14.03*** 14.34*** 4.08** 15.86*** 12.83***
Level-3 13.17*** 11.93*** 8.85** 11.29** 6.00* 13.48*** 14.18*** 8.86* 14.55***
Notes. 0Baseline model; 1CSI; 2Flooding; 3Reappraisal; 4Suppression; 5DERS; 6DASS; 7PANAS positive; 8PANAS negative.
a
Parameter estimates for simple slopes are unstandardized regression coefficients.
p<.10; *p<.05; **p<.01; ***p<.001.
Fam. Proc., Vol. x, xxxx, 2018
BAUCOM ET AL.
/
11
Taken together, our collection of findings indicates that HRR during marital conflict in
daily life is robustly associated in expected directions with a wide range of relationship
and individual functioning variables, that these associations are statistically significantly
greater than those involving HRR during laboratory conflict. Moreover, none of the associ-
ations involving HRR during laboratory conflict are predictive of individual or relationship
functioning variables,
6
which may indicate that laboratory associations are downwardly
biased.
DISCUSSION
This study examined differences in the magnitude of HRR during relationship conflict
in- and outside of the laboratory and differences in the magnitude of associations of HRR,
individual functioning, and relationship functioning variables across laboratory and natu-
ralistic contexts. Consistent with our hypotheses, there were significant interactions
between measurement context and individual and relationship functioning on HRR such
that HRR during naturalistic conflict was larger in magnitude and more strongly associ-
ated with both individual and relationship functioning variables relative to HRR during
laboratory conflict. Moreover, when decomposing these interactions, statistically signifi-
cant associations emerged in expected directions between seven of eight variables and
HRR during naturalistic conflict, but no statistically significant associations emerged
between any variable and HRR during laboratory conflict.
This collection of findings has both conceptual and methodological implications for the
study of psychophysiology, behavior, emotion, and psychological distress in romantic rela-
tionships. In contrast to meta-analytic findings documenting weak and inconsistent asso-
ciations between HRR and relationship adjustment, this study found strong and
consistent associations between HRR during relationship conflict, relationship functioning
variables, and individual functioning variablesbut only when HRR was measured in
naturalistic settings. These findings for HRR in naturalistic settings are consistent with
theoretical models that consider physiological reactivity during conflict to be a primary
mechanism by which romantic relationships impact overall well-being (e.g., Robles & Kie-
colt-Glaser, 2003) and support the notion that HRR during marital conflict is robustly
associated with a wide variety of individual and relationship functioning domains.
In addition to supporting the general premise of theoretical models (e.g., Robles & Kie-
colt-Glaser, 2003; Robles et al., 2014), the findings in this study suggest that such theoret-
ical models would benefit by incorporating context as a moderator of associations.
Statistically significant effects only emerged in HRR data collected during relationship
conflict in daily life. This pronounced difference in the strength of association involving a
wide range of individual and relationship variables suggests that HRR is not associated
with individual and relationship functioning variables in all interaction contexts.
Future research on HRR, and autonomic and endocrine reactivity more broadly, during
conjoint couple therapy is an area of particular need (e.g., Karvonen, Kykyri, Kaartinen,
Penttonen, & Seikkula, 2016). Spontaneous and planned (e.g., re-enactments of recent
arguments) couple conflict during couple therapy are both assumed to be representative of
couple conflict that occurs outside of the therapy room (e.g., Epstein & Baucom, 2002).
This assumed similarity includes form (i.e., how the couple behaves during and experi-
ences conflict) and functional implications (i.e., associations with other aspects of relation-
ship adjustment).
6
Because of the dummy coding scheme used to test differences in associations across interaction con-
texts, the conditional main effects in the MLMs represent the associations between each predictor and
HRR in planned laboratory conflicts.
www.FamilyProcess.org
12
/
FAMILY PROCESS
Study of autonomic and endocrine reactivity during conjoint couple therapy would be
beneficial not only because it would provide a further test of contextually dependent physi-
ological activation during couple conflict but also because it could provide practitioners
with information that could be used to guide treatment decisions. For example, if assump-
tions that conflicts during couple therapy are representative of how the couple normally
argues during daily life are correct, it is possible that physiological reactivity during
psychotherapy sessions may be associated with domains of emotional functioning similar
to those that were associated with at home HRR in this study (e.g., flooding, emotional
suppression, difficulties with emotion regulation). High levels of emotional reactivity
during couple conflict have been linked to poor treatment outcomes in couple therapy
(Baucom, Atkins, Simpson, & Christensen, 2009; Baucom, Weusthoff, Atkins, & Hahlweg,
2012) and an improved understanding of the physiological underpinnings of these associa-
tions could help therapists decide when and how to heighten versus dampen emotion
during couple therapy sessions (e.g., Baucom & Crenshaw, in press).
It is important to note that the individual and relationship functioning variables
included in this study were global assessments of what typically occurs in a relationship,
enduring psychological states that persisted over at least the previous week, and stable
individual differences in affectivity. While these findings demonstrate that HRR during
marital conflict in naturalistic settings is more consistently associated with such vari-
ables, it is unknown whether these findings will extend to other more proximal measures,
such as behavior during (or perceptions of) an instance of marital conflict. Examination of
differential patterns of associations involving HRR and proximal measures during marital
conflict in laboratory and naturalistic settings should be explored in future research.
The observed differences in the statistical significance and magnitude of associations
involving HRR during planned naturalistic conflict and those involving laboratory conflict
is particularly noteworthy given that couples were videotaped discussing the same two
topics for the same amount of time in similar physical settings during both data collection
settings. Given these similarities, it is not surprising that HRR values during laboratory
and planned naturalistic conflict were strongly correlated, r=.7, but it is surprising that
the statistical significance and magnitude of associations with individual and relationship
functioning variables were so different across the two contexts. One possible explanation
for these differences is that, even though couples were aware they were being videotaped
at home, there were fewer cues to remind them that they were participating in a study
during their home conversations. It is also possible that being at home contributed to
spouses behaving more naturalistically because they were in a more familiar environ-
ment. While such explanations are plausible, future research would benefit from including
a self-report measure of the representativeness of interactions in both settings to directly
test these possibilities.
Planned and spontaneous naturalistic conflict produced similar levels of HRR when
averaged across participants as a group, but HRR values during the two types of conflicts
were only modestly correlated, r=.34, and associations involving individual and relation-
ship functioning variables were inconsistent across the two types of conflict. No hypothe-
ses were made regarding differences in the strength of association across the two types of
conflict, and it is not immediately clear why such differences emerged. One possibility is
that HRR during spontaneous conflict may be considerably more variable than HRR dur-
ing planned conflict, and may be differentially associated with variables as a result. For
example, the topics discussed during planned conflicts both in and outside of the labora-
tory are topics that one or both spouses identified as being among the most upsetting in
their relationship. In contrast, spontaneous conflicts could have involved topic areas of a
wide range of importance to spouses.
Fam. Proc., Vol. x, xxxx, 2018
BAUCOM ET AL.
/
13
The patterns of associations with HRR across interaction contexts have the potential to
create valuable new avenues for relationship scientists to study marital conflict. The
field’s original goal of studying behavior and physiological reactivity during marital con-
flict in laboratory settings was to improve the quality of such data through tight experi-
mental control of the topics being discussed and the environments in which they occurred.
The results of this study suggest that studying HRR during marital conflict as it naturally
occurs during daily life with few or no constraints placed on topics, timing, or location of
discussions offers valuable insights into well-being. This pattern of findings has implica-
tions for a wide range of important domains of functioning (e.g., relationship satisfaction,
emotion regulation, and mood) that cannot be similarly assessed using laboratory conflict
data. As passive data acquisition technologies (i.e., methods for collecting data from partic-
ipants that involve little or no direct effort from participants themselves; e.g., Atkins &
Baucom, 2016; Goodwin, Velicer, & Intille, 2008) continue to develop, relationship scien-
tists will have an increasingly large number of options for collecting high quality data
about marital conflict using designs that maximize ecological validity (e.g., Hogan & Bau-
com, 2016; Walls, H
oppner, & Goodwin, 2007).
There are a number of limitations to keep in mind when considering this study’s
results. First, the sample size of couples in this study was small by current standards in
relationship science. The repeated measurement of HRR during conflict across contexts
reduces this concern because of the increase in precision of HRR estimates generated from
repeated measures. However, it is possible that this sample size of couples resulted in
Type II error in failing to find relationships between HRR in the laboratory and self-report
measures. Second, the timing of spontaneous naturalistic conflicts was based on self-
reports. The timing of the daily diaries was designed to assess potential relationship con-
flicts shortly after participants typically parted in the mornings and again after partici-
pants reunited in the evening, thereby minimizing reporting inaccuracies. Imprecision in
the reported timing of spontaneous conflicts could result in the inclusion of HR values out-
side of conflict and such data would likely reduce the magnitude of HRR and their
strength of associations with individual and relationship variables. Thus, while impreci-
sion in the timing of reported spontaneous conflicts may have occurred, concerns about its
impact on findings are reduced given the statistical significance and consistency of find-
ings across multiple individual and relationship variables. Third, the planned conflict dis-
cussions at home always occurred after the planned conflict discussions in the laboratory
and it is therefore not possible to disentangle order effects from locations effects in tests of
laboratory versus planned at home data. It is possible that HRR was higher during the
planned at home discussions simply because it was the second time that partners dis-
cussed the same topics within a week’s time. Significantly greater HRR during sponta-
neous conflicts relative to laboratory conflicts and nonsignificant differences in HRR
between planned at home and spontaneous conflicts mitigates this concern. Replication of
these findings with data from a fully factorial, order (1st vs. 2nd) by location (laboratory
vs. at home) design is an important direction for future research. Fourth, equipment mal-
function resulted in the unavailability of HRR data during planned conflicts for two cou-
ples. These malfunctions appeared to be random, but it is possible that these missing data
biased results. Finally, participants were largely Caucasian and did not have children. In
addition, the average age of men (M=29.3) in the sample was below that for first time
fathers in the United States (M=30.9; Khandwala, Zhang, Lu, & Eisenberg, 2017), but
the average age of women in the sample (M=28.1) was above that for first time mothers
in the United States (M=26.4; CIA, 2017). These demographic characteristics of the sam-
ple may limit its generalizability and highlight the importance of replicating study find-
ings in a larger and more diverse sample of couples.
www.FamilyProcess.org
14
/
FAMILY PROCESS
Despite these limitations, the results of this study suggest that assessing HRRand
potentially physiological reactivity more broadlyduring relationship conflict outside of
the laboratory may improve relationship scientists’ ability to understand various ways
that physiological reactivity during conflict can differentially associate with individual
and relational functioning. Assessing physiological reactivity outside of the laboratory can
involve loss of experimental control, decrease measurement precision, and add noise to
data. However, these drawbacks appear to be outweighed by the unique associations with
multiple variables provided by data acquired outside of laboratory settings. Studying asso-
ciations involving physiological reactivity across multiple contexts appears to be a fruitful
direction for future research, and relationship scientists interested in physiological mech-
anisms are encouraged to consider incorporating ambulatory methods to complement labo-
ratory measurement.
REFERENCES
Antony, M. M., Bieling, P. J., Cox, B. J., Enns, M. W., & Swinson, R. P. (1998). Psychometric properties of the 42-
item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a community sample.
Psychological Assessment,10, 176181. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.176.
Atkins, D. A., & Baucom, B. R. (2016). Emerging methodological and statistical techniques in couple research. In
E. Lawrence & K. Sullivan (Eds.), Oxford handbook of relationship science and couple interventions (pp. 148
163). New York: Oxford University Press.
Baucom, B. R., Atkins, D., Simpson, L., & Christensen, A. (2009). Prediction of response to treatment in a ran-
domized clinical trial of couple therapy: A 2-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,
77, 160173. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014405.
Baucom, B. R. W., & Crenshaw, A. O. (in press). Evaluating the efficacy of couple and family therapy. In B. Fiese,
M. Whisman, M. Celano, K. Deater-Deckard, & E. Jouriles (Eds.), APA handbook of contemporary family psy-
chology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Baucom, B. R., Weusthoff, S., Atkins, D., & Hahlweg, K. (2012). Greater emotional arousal predicts poorer long-
term memory of communication skills in couples. Behaviour Research and Therapy,50, 442447. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.brat.2012.03.010.
Brage, S., Brage, N., Franks, P., Ekelund, U., & Wareham, N. (2005). Reliability and validity of the combined
heart rate and movement sensor Actiheart. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition,59, 561570. https://doi.
org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602118.
Butler, E. A., Egloff, B., Wilhelm, F. H., Smith, N. C., Erickson, E. A., & Gross, J. J. (2003). The social conse-
quences of expressive suppression. Emotion,3,4867. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.3.1.48.
Butler, E. A., Gross, J. J., & Barnard, K. (2014). Testing the effects of suppression and reappraisal on emotional
concordance using a multivariate multilevel model. Biological Psychology,98,618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
biopsycho.2013.09.003.
CamNTech Inc. (2014). Actiheart [equipment]. Boerne, TX: CamNTech Inc.
Central Intelligence Agency (2017). The World Factbook. Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/library/publi
cations/the-world-factbook/fields/2256.html
Cohen, S., Hamrick, N. M., Rodriguez, M. S., Feldman, P. J., Rabin, B. S., & Manuck, S. B. (2000). The stability of
and intercorrelations among cardiovascular, immune, endocrine, and psychological reactivity. Annals of
Behavioral Medicine,22, 171179. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02895111
Denton, W. H., Burleson, B. R., Hobbs, B. V., Von Stein, M., & Rodriguez, C. P. (2001). Cardiovascular reactivity
and initiate/avoid patterns of marital communication: A test of Gottman’s psychophysiologic model of marital
interaction. Journal of Behavioral Medicine,24, 401421. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1012278209577.
Ditzen, B., Neumann, I. D., Bodenmann, G., von Dawans, B., Turner, R. A., Ehlert, U. et al. (2007). Effects of dif-
ferent kinds of couple interaction on cortisol and heart rate responses to stress in women. Psychoneuroen-
docrinology,32, 565574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2007.03.011.
Epstein, N. B., & Baucom, D. H. (2002). Enhanced cognitive-behavioral therapy for couples: A contextual
approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10481-000
Funk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measure-
ment for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology,21, 572
583. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572.
Gerin, W., Christenfeld, N., Pieper, C., Derafael, D. A., Su, O., Stroessner, S. J. et al. (1998). The generalizability
of cardiovascular responses across settings. Journal of Psychosomatic Research,44, 209218. https://doi.org/
10.1016/S0022-3999(97)00207-9
BAUCOM ET AL.
/
15
Fam. Proc., Vol. x, xxxx, 2018
Goodwin, M. S., Velicer, W. F., & Intille, S. S. (2008). Telemetric monitoring in the behavior sciences. Behavioral
Research Methods,40, 328341. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.40.1.328.
Gottman, J. M. (1999). The marriage clinic: A scientifically-based marital therapy. New York: WW Norton &
Company.
Gottman, J. M., Jacobson, N. S., Rushe, R. H., & Shortt, J. W. (1995). The relationship between heart rate reactiv-
ity, emotionally aggressive behavior, and general violence in batterers. Journal of Family Psychology,9, 227
248. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.9.3.227.
Gottman, J. M., & Krokoff, L. J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view. Journal of Con-
sulting and Clinical Psychology,57,4752. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.57.1.47.
Gottman, J., Notarius, C., Gonso, J., & Markman, H. (1976). A couple’s guide to communication. Champaign, IL:
Research Press.
Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Devel-
opment, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psy-
chopathology and Behavioral Assessment,26,4154. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.9.3.227.
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for
affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,85, 348362. https://doi.
org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348.
Gross, J. J., & Levenson, R. W. (1993). Emotional suppression: Physiological, self-report, and expressive behavior.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,64, 970986. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.6.970.
Heyman, R. E. (2001). Observation of couple conflicts: Clinical assessment applications, stubborn truths, and
shaky foundations. Psychological Assessment,13,535. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.13.1.5.
Hogan, J. N., & Baucom, B. R. (2016). Behavioral, affective, and physiological monitoring. In J. K. Luiselli & A. J.
Fischer (Eds.), Computer-assisted and web-based innovations in psychology, special education, and health (pp.
332). New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802075-3.00001-2
Kamarck, T. W., Debski, T. T., & Manuck, S. B. (2000). Enhancing the laboratory-to-life generalizability of cardio-
vascular reactivity using multiple occasions of measurement. Psychophysiology,37, 533542. https://doi.org/
10.1111/1469-8986.3740533
Karvonen, A., Kykyri, V. L., Kaartinen, J., Penttonen, M., & Seikkula, J. (2016). Sympathetic nervous system
synchrony in couple therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy,42, 383395. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmf
t.12152
Khandwala, Y. S., Zhang, C. A., Lu, Y., & Eisenberg, M. L. (2017). The age of fathers in the USA is rising: An
analysis of 168 867 480 births from 1972 to 2015. Human Reproduction,32, 21102116. https://doi.org/10.
1093/humrep/dex267
Khattar, R. S., Senior, R., & Lahiri, A. (1998). Cardiovascular outcome in white-coat versus sustained mild hyper-
tension: A 10-year follow-up study. Circulation,98, 18921897. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.98.18.1892.
Kirschbaum, C., Pirke, K. M., & Hellhammer, D. H. (1993). The ‘Trier Social Stress Test’: A tool for investigating
psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology,28, 76–81.
Kristiansen, J., Korshøj, M., Skotte, J. H., Jespersen, T., Søgaard, K., Mortensen, O. S. et al. (2011). Comparison
of two systems for long-term heart rate variability monitoring in free-living conditions-a pilot study. Biomedi-
cal Engineering Online,10, 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925x-10-27.
Larson, M. R., Ader, R., & Moynihan, J. A. (2001). Heart rate, neuroendocrine, and immunological reactivity in
response to an acute laboratory stressor. Psychosomatic Medicine,63, 493501. https://doi.org/10.1097/
00006842-200105000-00020.
Levenson, R. W., Carstensen, L. L., & Gottman, J. M. (1994). Influence of age and gender on affect, physiology,
and their interrelations: A study of long-term marriages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,67,
5668. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.1.56.
Levenson, R. W., & Gottman, J. M. (1985). Physiological and affective predictors of change in relationship satis-
faction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,49,8594. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.85.
Nealey-Moore, J. B., Smith, T. W., Uchino, B. N., Hawkins, M. W., & Olson-Cerny, C. (2007). Cardiovascular reac-
tivity during positive and negative marital interactions. Journal of Behavioral Medicine,30, 505519.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-007-9124-5.
Newton, T. L., & Sanford, J. M. (2003). Conflict structure moderates associations between cardiovascular reactiv-
ity and negative marital interaction. Health Psychology,22, 270278. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.22.3.
270.
Robles, T. F., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (2003). The physiology of marriage: Pathways to health. Physiology &
Behavior,79, 409416. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9384(03)00160-4.
Robles, T. F., Slatcher, R. B., Trombello, J. M., & McGinn, M. M. (2014). Marital quality and health: A meta-ana-
lytic review. Psychological Bulletin,140, 140187. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031859.
Rossi, R. C., Vanderlei, L. C. M., Gonc
ßalves, A. C. C. R., Vanderlei, F. M., Bernardo, A. F. B., Yamada, K. M. H.
et al. (2015). Impact of obesity on autonomic modulation, heart rate and blood pressure in obese young people.
Autonomic Neuroscience,193, 138141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2015.07.424
16
/
FAMILY PROCESS
www.FamilyProcess.org
Smith, T. W., & O’Keeffe, J. L. (1988). Cross-situational consistency of cardiovascular reactivity. Biological Psy-
chology,27, 237243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(88)90033-6
Smith, T. W., Uchino, B. N., Berg, C. A., Florsheim, P., Pearce, G., Hawkins, M. et al. (2009). Conflict and collabo-
ration in middle-aged and older couples: II. Cardiovascular reactivity during marital interaction. Psychology
and Aging,24, 274286. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016067
Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales:
Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues,17, 283316. https://doi.org/10.
1177/019251396017003001.
Walls, T. A., H
oppner, B. B., & Goodwin, M. S. (2007). Statistical issues in intensive longitudinal data analysis.
In A. Stone, S. Shiffman, A. Atienza, & L. Nebelling (Eds.), The science of real-time data capture (pp. 338
360). New York: Oxford University Press.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of Positive and
Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,54, 10631070. https://doi.
org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.
Whisman, M. A., & Uebelacker, L. A. (2003). Comorbidity of relationship distress and mental and physical health
problems. In D. K. Snyder & M. A. Whisman (Eds.), Treating difficult couples: Helping clients with coexisting
mental and relationship disorders (pp. 326). New York: The Guilford Press.
Fam. Proc., Vol. x, xxxx, 2018
BAUCOM ET AL.
/
17
... Similarly, for each person that a participant indicates they had an argument with, they are asked to provide approximately when the argument began and ended, as well as how distressed they felt and how satisfied they felt with the outcome of the event (using the same 10-point response scale). This measure has been used previously to successfully identify the approximate timing of various distressing events throughout the day [66]. In this study, it is administered nightly during the 7-day intensive data collection phase of this study. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Computational psychiatry has the potential to advance the diagnosis, mechanistic understanding, and treatment of mental health conditions. Promising results from clinical samples have led to calls to extend these methods to mental health risk assessment in the general public; however, data typically used with clinical samples are neither available nor scalable for research in the general population. Digital phenotyping addresses this by capitalizing on the multimodal and widely available data created by sensors embedded in personal digital devices (eg, smartphones) and is a promising approach to extending computational psychiatry methods to improve mental health risk assessment in the general population. Objective Building on recommendations from existing computational psychiatry and digital phenotyping work, we aim to create the first computational psychiatry data set that is tailored to studying mental health risk in the general population; includes multimodal, sensor-based behavioral features; and is designed to be widely shared across academia, industry, and government using gold standard methods for privacy, confidentiality, and data integrity. Methods We are using a stratified, random sampling design with 2 crossed factors (difficulties with emotion regulation and perceived life stress) to recruit a sample of 400 community-dwelling adults balanced across high- and low-risk for episodic mental health conditions. Participants first complete self-report questionnaires assessing current and lifetime psychiatric and medical diagnoses and treatment, and current psychosocial functioning. Participants then complete a 7-day in situ data collection phase that includes providing daily audio recordings, passive sensor data collected from smartphones, self-reports of daily mood and significant events, and a verbal description of the significant daily events during a nightly phone call. Participants complete the same baseline questionnaires 6 and 12 months after this phase. Self-report questionnaires will be scored using standard methods. Raw audio and passive sensor data will be processed to create a suite of daily summary features (eg, time spent at home). Results Data collection began in June 2022 and is expected to conclude by July 2024. To date, 310 participants have consented to the study; 149 have completed the baseline questionnaire and 7-day intensive data collection phase; and 61 and 31 have completed the 6- and 12-month follow-up questionnaires, respectively. Once completed, the proposed data set will be made available to academic researchers, industry, and the government using a stepped approach to maximize data privacy. Conclusions This data set is designed as a complementary approach to current computational psychiatry and digital phenotyping research, with the goal of advancing mental health risk assessment within the general population. This data set aims to support the field’s move away from siloed research laboratories collecting proprietary data and toward interdisciplinary collaborations that incorporate clinical, technical, and quantitative expertise at all stages of the research process. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/53857
... It's important to emphasized caution when interpreting these results. While our findings are consistent with previous studies that have employed similar procedures, its crucial to acknowledge the existence of studies that have failed to found a relationship between laboratory reactivity measures and those observed in everyday life (Gerin et al., 1998;Baucom et al., 2018;De Calheiros Velozo et al., 2023). This potential disparity could impact the external validity of our current study. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Cardiovascular reactivity refers to changes in blood pressure and heart rate in response to internal or external stimuli. Previous research has shown that excessively high and low cardiovascular reactivity are associated with an increased risk of cardiac problems. Dispositional optimism has been associated with numerous health benefits, including better cardiovascular responses to stressors, and reduced mortality risk. Conversely, pessimism has been associated with negative health outcomes and worse cardiovascular reactivity to stress. Mood, comprising positive and negative affect, can significantly impact psychological adjustment and physical health. Therefore, it is important to consider mood as a potential confounding variable in the link between optimism and cardiovascular reactivity. The study hypothesized that optimism and pessimism would still influence cardiovascular reactivity even when mood variables were controlled for. Methods A within-subjects correlational design with 107 young adult participants was used. Sociodemographic and clinical questionnaires were administered to collect information on participants’ characteristics. The Dispositional Optimism Scale (LOT-R) and the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) were used to assess participants’ levels of optimism, pessimism, and mood. Measures of cardiovascular reactivity, including systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and heart rate (HR), were taken during a stressor task (PASAT). Results There is a moderate positive correlation between dispositional optimism and positive affect, while pessimism demonstrated a moderate positive association with negative affect. Linear regression analyses were conducted, controlling baseline reactivity variables, gender, and body mass index. The results showed that pessimism had a significant negative effect on SBP reactivity, suggesting that higher levels of pessimism decreased SBP response. Optimism had a significant positive effect on DBP reactivity, while pessimism had a significant negative effect. Discussion Overall, these results suggest that dispositional optimism and pessimism are related to cardiovascular reactivity, even after controlling for positive and negative affect. Pessimism was associated with lower SBP reactivity, while both optimism and pessimism influenced DBP reactivity. These findings are consistent with previous research indicating that optimism enables more effective stress management during challenging events, whereas pessimism can serve as a risk factor, heightening the likelihood of experiencing future cardiac issued caused by blunted cardiovascular reactivity.
... Future work might incorporate discussions of conflict between partners to determine whether the way that power is associated with markers of challenge and threat generalizes to other contexts. Further, although we view the in vivo method of this study as a strength, there are some tradeoffs to internal validity that come at the expense of using this type of immersive method (Baucom et al., 2018;Kamarck et al., 2003). Specifically, we did not experimentally manipulate power in our study, and even though we suggest that actors who are high in power may experience more avoidance-oriented motivation when their power feels threatened, we did not directly measure or manipulate threats to power. ...
Article
Full-text available
Power, the capacity to influence others while resisting their attempts at influence, has implications for a wide variety of individual- and relationship-level outcomes. One potential mechanism through which power may be associated with various outcomes is motivation orientation. High power has been linked to greater approach-oriented motivation, whereas low power has been linked to greater avoidance-oriented motivation. However, current research has mostly relied on artificially created relationships (and the power dynamics therein) in the lab to assess the associations between power and motivation orientations. Utilizing the Biopsychosocial Model of Challenge and Threat framework, the current study examined how power is related to physiological responses indicative of psychological challenge (i.e., approach) and threat (i.e., avoidance) during discussions of problems outside of the relationship between romantic partners. The primary hypothesis that higher power would be associated with more approach-oriented challenge and less avoidance-oriented threat was supported via self-reports, but not via physiological assessments. Instead, physiological assessments revealed that for those disclosing problems to high-power partners, greater power was associated with reactivity consistent with more avoidance-oriented threat and less approach-oriented challenge. This is the first research to examine associations between power and in vivo indices of challenge and threat during interactions between romantic partners. It advances our understanding of how power elicits motivation orientations and influences the stress response system by highlighting the importance of situational attributes (e.g., role during a conversation) that may undermine power during disclosures with a high-power partner.
... For instance, one area ripe for ongoing work is research that examines physiological linkages between various relationship dynamics and relationship outcomes, an area explored in 13 articles (2.8%) included in our review. For example, Kiecolt-Glaser et al. (2003) found that newlywed couples who were more reactive physiologically during conflict were more likely to be dissatisfied or divorced 10 years later, and another study found that couples had greater heart rate reactivity and that it had more significant effects on relationship functioning during conflicts in naturalistic than in laboratory settings (Baucom et al., 2018). A daily diary study also showed that men with higher vagal tone (measured via respiratory sinus arrhythmia) were described by their female partners as more understanding and connected during their daily interactions compared to men with lower vagal tone (Diamond et al., 2011). ...
Article
Full-text available
Longitudinal dyadic research provides significant benefits for our understanding of romantic couple relationships. In this systematic review, we begin by providing a broad overview of topical trends and approaches in longitudinal couple relationships research from 2002 through 2021. Then, we narrow our review to dyadic relationship quality articles, highlighting key themes as well as noting important gaps in the research. Using an intersectional perspective that acknowledges multiple ways that disadvantage, power, and oppression may be seen in both research and in couples’ lived experience, we note prominent paradigms used in examining couple relationships, what types of questions have been most valued, and what groups and approaches are underrepresented in the literature. Most longitudinal couple relationships research is quantitative, relies on self-report approaches from American couples in the early-to-middle years of their relationships, concentrates more on negative aspects of relationships than positives, and takes a communication-satisfaction paradigm in studying couples. We see a clear need to increase the use of methodologies beyond self-report measures, conduct more studies with within-group minority, older adult, culturally-diverse, and context-specific samples to explore the diversity of relationships and fully consider both strengths and positive processes in relationships as well as the challenges couples experience.
... EMA may be leveraged in future studies to address potential shortcomings of self-report recall measures and capture additional microlongitudinal dynamics in the relationship between conflict behaviors and alcohol use. Additionally, there may be significant differences in physiological responding to laboratory conflict and conflict at home among couples (Baucom et al., 2018), suggesting an EMA and/or multimethod assessment approach to compare controlled and naturalistic outcomes may be necessary to replicate and extend the current findings. Similarly, while the current laboratory study was rigorously controlled, it is also cross-sectional in that visits took place on 1 day. ...
Article
Full-text available
A robust literature links social stress exposure to alcohol use and associated cognitions such as craving. Romantic relationships are a particularly salient social stressor and conflict interactions are a risk factor for alcohol misuse. Understanding the relationship between couples’ return to baseline neuroendocrine levels following conflict may help to identify important individual and dyadic differences associated with alcohol misuse. The present study is a secondary data analysis (see [blinded]). Participants were 30 different-sex couples (N = 60) with current alcohol or drug misuse. Couples participated in a 10-min conflict conversation with salivary cortisol measured before conflict (Time 1), immediately following conflict (Time 2) and after a 45-min rest period (Time 3), with increased cortisol indicating an increased stress response. Partners who had more decrease in cortisol from Time 2 to Time 3 had significantly less days of alcohol use over the previous 90 days (B = −69.94, SE = 30.62, p = .022). Additionally, partners with lower relationship satisfaction had significantly more days of alcohol use over the previous 90 days (B = −.57, SE = .15, p < .001), and significantly more standard drinks over the previous 90 days (B = −4.87, SE = 2.49, p = .05). These findings were qualified by an interaction such that partners with lower decrease in cortisol and lower relationship functioning reported significantly more drinking days and total standard drinks. These findings suggest that greater alcohol use may be associated with poorer relationship functioning. Additionally, in a controlled laboratory setting, slower neuroendocrine recovery from the stress of relationship conflict may be a risk factor for alcohol misuse, regardless of relationship satisfaction.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: Modern lifestyles are triggering stress at a disproportionate rate for longer periods of time. Chronic or long-lasting stress can pose a risk to our health. Despite advances in physiological recording methods, mental stress remains challenging to quantify and monitor. Methods: We describe an Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) device with electrocardiogram (ECG) recording features. The recorded ECG signal is processed on-the-fly to calculate, in real time, heart rate, heart rate variability, energy expenditure and mental stress. Data are sent to an online platform using a standard Internet of Things (IoT) publish-subscribe messaging transport protocol for continuous monitoring. Results: The system functionality is first validated by performing hardware-in-the-loop measurements connected to a patient simulator. We then monitored induced stress by recording ECG in subjects using liquid metal electrodes performing a plank walking task in a virtual reality (VR) environment with high heights exposure. The results demonstrate our IoMT system’s ability to provide accurate ECG metrics using novel liquid metal electrodes by detecting continuously increased stress values in a VR setting and at-home. Conclusion: The IoMT measurement device presented provides a novel strategy for monitoring stress in real time. Significance: Our work provides the opportunity for future research on psychological stress and emotion regulation within daily life and the physiological mechanisms through which it influences the health of both children and adults.
Article
Typical measures of laboratory reactivity (i.e. difference between control and stress) and recovery (i.e. difference between stress and post-stress) were compared with a conventional measure of daily-life reactivity, best known as event-related stress. Fifty-three healthy individuals between 19 and 35 years of age took part in a laboratory session where stress was induced using the repeated Montreal Imaging Stress Task and eight days of experience sampling method. Measures of negative affect, heart rate, heart rate variability, and skin conductance level were collected. Findings show no strong associations between laboratory and daily life measures with the exception of laboratory affective recovery and daily life reactivity. Findings and their implications are discussed. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Article
Objectives: Social-emotional well-being is said to improve over adulthood, and studies of couples' age differences have focused primarily on marital conflict. The way couples discuss their relationship story predicts marital quality among newlyweds and long-married couples alike, yet older and younger couples' accounts have never been compared. The current study examined age differences in couples' use of I/we-talk, emotion words, and immediacy (i.e., an urgent, unresolved style) during a relationship history discussion, and their subsequent mood reactivity and appraisals. Method: Married couples (N = 186 individuals within 93 couples, ages 22-77) recounted the story of their relationship then rated the discussion and their negative mood. Mediation models assessed the three linguistic features as parallel dyadic mediators linking couple age to negative mood responses and appraisals, controlling for global marital satisfaction and baseline negative mood. Secondary analyses examined partners' concordance in language use. Results: Compared to younger couples, older couples used more positive than negative words and less immediacy, which in turn, was associated with husbands' and wives' less negative mood and more positive appraisals, only among husbands. Partners in older couples used more similar I/we-talk and emotional language, but these were unrelated to mood or appraisals. Discussion: This study extends our understanding of how marital interactions differ by age in the understudied context of relationship history discussions, which may grow increasingly important for couples' well-being with older age. Findings broadly align with social-emotional aging theories and uncover novel linguistic features relevant to the age-related emotional benefits of joint reminiscing.
Article
The quality of romantic relationships influences physical and mental health. However, maintaining happy and healthy relationships is challenging; relationship satisfaction declines over time, and relationship dissolution is frequent. This raises the question of which factors contribute to the maintenance versus decline of relationship satisfaction. In this Review, we examine the key factors that have been linked to relationship satisfaction in both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Specifically, we describe how self-reported perceptions (subjective perceptions of the self, the partner or the relationship), implicit evaluations (automatic evaluations of one’s partner assessed indirectly) and objective indexes (demographics, life events, communication patterns and biological indexes) relate to relationship satisfaction. This synthesis suggests that self-reported perceptions are not always the most reliable predictors of longitudinal changes in relationship satisfaction. Thus, to uncover why some relationships flourish and others struggle over time, future research should not solely focus on self-reported perceptions, but also on implicit evaluations, demographics, life events, communication patterns and biological factors, and their combination. The quality of romantic relationships influences physical and mental health. However, maintaining happy and healthy relationships is challenging. In this Review, Righetti et al. examine the key factors that have been linked to relationship satisfaction in both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.
Article
Full-text available
Self-reported affect and autonomic and somatic physiology were studied during three 15-min conversations (events of the day, problem area, pleasant topic) in a sample of 151 couples in long-term marriages. Couples differed in age (40–50 or 60–70) and marital satisfaction (satisfied or dissatisfied). Marital interaction in older couples was associated with more affective positivity and lower physiological arousal (even when controlling for affective differences) than in middle-age couples. As has previously been found with younger couples, marital dissatisfaction was associated with less positive affect, greater negative affect, and greater negative affect reciprocity. In terms of the relation between physiological arousal and affective experience, husbands reported feeling more negative the more they were physiologically aroused; for wives, affect and arousal were not correlated. These findings are related to theories of socioemotional change with age and of gender differences in marital behavior and health.
Article
Full-text available
Two longitudinal studies of marital interaction were conducted using observational coding of couples attempting to resolve a high-conflict issue. We found that a different pattern of results predicts concurrent marital satisfaction than predicts change in marital satisfaction over 3 years. Results suggest that some marital interaction patterns, such as disagreement and anger exchanges, which have usually been considered harmful to a marriage, may not be harmful in the long run. These patterns were found to relate to unhappiness and negative interaction at home concurrently, but they were predictive of improvement in marital satisfaction longitudinally. However, three interaction patterns: were identified as dysfunctional in terms of longitudinal deterioration: defensiveness (which includes: whining), stubborness, and withdrawal from interaction. Hypotheses about gender differences in roles for the maintenance of marital satisfaction are presented.
Article
Given recent attention to emotion regulation as a potentially unifying function of diverse symptom presentations, there is a need for comprehensive measures that adequately assess difficulties in emotion regulation among adults. This paper (a) proposes an integrative conceptualization of emotion regulation as involving not just the modulation of emotional arousal, but also the awareness, understanding, and acceptance of emotions, and the ability to act in desired ways regardless of emotional state; and (b) begins to explore the factor structure and psychometric properties of a new measure, the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). Two samples of undergraduate students completed questionnaire packets. Preliminary findings suggest that the DERS has high internal consistency, good test–retest reliability, and adequate construct and predictive validity.
Article
Study question: How has the mean paternal age in the USA changed over the past 4 decades? Summary answer: The age at which men are fathering children in the USA has been increasing over time, although it varies by race, geographic region and paternal education level. What is known already: While the rise in mean maternal age and its implications for fertility, birth outcomes and public health have been well documented, little is known about paternal characteristics of births within the USA. Study design, size, duration: A retrospective data analysis of paternal age and reporting patterns for 168 867 480 live births within the USA since 1972 was conducted. Participants/materials, setting, methods: All live births within the USA collected through the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were evaluated. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to reduce bias due to missing paternal records. Main results and the role of chance: Mean paternal age has increased over the past 44 years from 27.4 to 30.9 years. College education and Northeastern birth states were associated with higher paternal age. Racial/ethnic differences were also identified, whereby Asian fathers were the oldest and Black fathers were the youngest. The parental age difference (paternal age minus maternal age) has decreased over the past 44 years. Births to Black and Native American mothers were most often lacking paternal data, implying low paternal reporting. Paternal reporting was higher for older and more educated women. Limitations, reasons for caution: Although we utilized IPW to reduce the impact of paternal reporting bias, our estimates may still be influenced by the missing data in the NVSS. Wider implications of the findings: Paternal age is rising within the USA among all regions, races and education levels. Given the implications for offspring health and demographic patterns, further research on this trend is warranted. Study funding/competing interest(s): No funding was received for this study and there are no competing interests. Trial registration number: N/A.
Chapter
A tremendous amount of research has been devoted to developing methods and technologies for assessing biological, psychological, and social factors associated with psychological well-being and dysfunction. The biopsychosocial model (Engel, 1977), which has been the prevailing conceptual model of psychological disorders since its introduction in the late 1970s, suggests that psychological disorders are best understood as a combination of biological, psychological, and social factors. Thus, the ability to efficiently and reliably measure components of these three factors has long been a top priority for researchers and clinicians alike. There are well-established methods for assessing numerous components of each of these factors in research settings, but, thus far, there has been a lag in the development of methods and technologies for assessing similar biological, psychological, and social factors in applied settings. Recent technological developments are beginning to correct this imbalance, making it ever more practical and feasible to reliably and efficiently measure biological, psychological, and social factors in real world settings; and to do so in a way that integrates components and examines the interplay between them. This chapter provides an introduction to these recent technological and methodological advances with a specific focus on the assessment of enacted behavior, affective expression, and physiological activity. The chapter begins with a brief review of established laboratory-based methods, and describes recent and ongoing technological developments for collecting similar data outside of the research laboratory. The chapter closes with a discussion of how these technologies could help inform clinical practices and presents a research agenda for future technological development and implementation.
Article
Download early view of the article: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmft.12152/abstract The aim of this study was to test whether there is statistically significant sympathetic nervous system (SNS) synchrony between participants in couple therapy. To our knowledge, this is the first study to measure psychophysiological synchrony during therapy in a multiactor setting. The study focuses on electrodermal activity (EDA) in the second couple therapy session from 10 different cases (20 clients, 10 therapists working in pairs). The EDA concordance index was used as a measure of SNS synchrony between dyads, and synchrony was found in 85% of all the dyads. Surprisingly, co-therapists exhibited the highest levels of synchrony, whereas couples exhibited the lowest synchrony. The client-therapist synchrony was lower than that of the co-therapists, but higher than that of the couples.
Article
Obesity can be understood as a comorbidity of increasing systemic impact, including a deficit in the autonomic nervous system. To analyze cardiac autonomic behavior and hemodynamic parameters in obese young people. 92 individuals (20.58±1.48years) were evaluated, divided into two groups: obese and eutrophic. Heart rate (HR) was captured for 30min in the supine position whilst breathing spontaneously. Blood pressure (BP) values were obtained prior to performance of the protocol. For the autonomic analysis, 1000 beats were used for the calculation of heart rate variability indices in the time (Mean RR, SDNN and RMSSD) and frequency (LF, HF and LF/HF) domains, in addition to the Poincaré plot (SD1, SD2, SD1/SD2 and qualitative visual analysis). The obese group presented higher baseline BP and HR values compared to the eutrophic. Regarding autonomic modulation a significant decrease was observed in the RMSSD; SD1, HFms and HFnu indices in the obese group, indicating a decrease in vagal activity and reduced SDNN and SD2 rates, with statistical significance for the former, suggesting a reduction in overall variability. The high value of the LFnu index and decrease in Mean RR in the obese group pointed to relative sympathetic predominance in these individuals. The visual analysis of the Poincaré plot showed less dispersion of the points in the obese group. The obese group presented higher BP and HR values at rest and autonomic impairment, characterized by a reduction in parasympathetic activity and relative predominance of sympathetic activity. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.