Content uploaded by Kim P. C. Kuypers
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Kim P. C. Kuypers on May 04, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Medical Hypotheses
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mehy
Out of the box: A psychedelic model to study the creative mind
K.P.C. Kuypers
Department of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
ARTICLE INFO
Keywords:
Psychedelics
Psilocybin
Divergent flexible thinking
Brain networks
Creativity
Psychedelic model
ABSTRACT
Our creativity is challenged daily when facing new situations asking for novel solutions. Creativity, a multi-
component construct includes flexible divergent and rigid convergent thinking. Psychedelic drugs like psilocybin
can enhance creativity and affect state of mind (mood, empathy, openness). Of note, flexible thinking is dis-
turbed in psychopathological conditions like anxiety disorders and depression and preliminary findings have
shown psychedelics to be efficacious in the treatment of those conditions.
The question how psychedelics induce this state of enhanced flexible thinking remains to be answered and
investigating the neurobiology underlying this phenomenon will not only help in understanding why psyche-
delics are of use in the therapeutic setting but also in other settings where flexible thinking is challenged. A
model including neuronal networks, neurotransmitters and personal factors playing a role in this process will be
proposed which can be put to the test by means of placebo-controlled pharmaco-imaging studies in healthy
volunteers.
Introduction
In daily life people are challenged by situations of all kinds asking
for creative problems solving skills [1,2]. Being able to come up with
alternative solutions to a problem is one aspect of creativity which is
called (flexible) divergent thinking. It is different from (rigid) con-
vergent thinking which is about finding the best solution to a problem.
Divergent thinking has been shown to be a more useful estimate of
creative thoughts in daily life than convergent thinking [3]. Flexible
thinking is also known to be decreased in certain psychopathological
conditions like depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder
(PTSD) [4–10].
Interestingly, anecdotal evidence, historical examples and (quasi-)
experimental studies suggest that psychedelic drugs like LSD, psilocybin
and ayahuasca enhance creative flexible thinking in the neuro-typical
population [11–16]. In addition, the therapeutic potential of these
substances is now being investigated in the treatment of aforemen-
tioned mental disorders [17–19]. Preliminary findings in patient sam-
ples are promising showing beneficial therapeutic outcomes lasting up
to a few weeks after treatment [20–22]. It is hypothesized that these
effects are due to a shift from rigid thinking patterns to more flexible
thinking patterns, facilitating psychotherapeutic interventions [15].
The question how psychedelics induce this state of enhanced flex-
ible thinking remains to be answered and investigating the neuro-
biology underlying this phenomenon will not only help in under-
standing why psychedelics are of use in the therapeutic setting but also
in other settings where flexible thinking is challenged. A model in-
cluding neuronal networks, neurotransmitters and personal factors
playing a role in this process will be proposed which can be put to the
test by means of placebo-controlled pharmaco-imaging studies in
healthy volunteers.
Creativity and brain networks
The biological base underlying creativity has been suggested to
consist of a dynamic interplay between several brain regions including
the three core brain networks, the central executive network (CEN), the
default mode network (DMN) and the salience network (SN) [23,24].
The CEN links the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and pos-
terior parietal cortices (PPC) and is engaged in higher-order cognitive
and attentional control [25]. The DMN has 2 important key nodes, the
ventromedial (vm) PFC, implicated in self-referential processing, and
the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), a critical connector hub to all
regions of the DMN [25–28]. The SN consists of the anterior insula (AI)
and the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), both implicated in
empathy [25,29–31]. It monitors events occurring outside of the body
as well as internal consciousness, and is able to direct attention to
whatever is more important at a certain moment in time.
Increased coupling between DMN and SN regions was demonstrated
at the beginning of a divergent thinking task, followed by increased
coupling between DMN and CEN regions at later stages [32].Itis
suggested that the shifts between these externally (CEN) and internally
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2018.03.010
Received 8 February 2018; Accepted 22 March 2018
E-mail address: k.kuypers@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Medical Hypotheses 115 (2018) 13–16
0306-9877/ © 2018 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-NC-ND/4.0/).
T
(DMN) oriented cognitive networks, facilitated by SN, are very im-
portant in the process of divergent thinking [24]. Of note, it has been
shown that the SN becomes active shortly before an insightful solution
is reached [33]. Furthermore, the DMN is considered to be involved in
daydreaming and self-reflection and responsible for the capacity to
imagine past, future, or hypothetical scenarios [25,27,28]. A positive
association between divergent thinking and resting state functional
connectivity in the vmPFC and the PCC was demonstrated [27].
In sum, this activity pattern suggests that divergent flexible thinking
involves cooperation between brain networks linked to cognitive con-
trol and spontaneous thought, which may reflect focused internal at-
tention and top-down control of spontaneous cognition during creative
idea production [32].
Creativity, networks and neurotransmitters
It has been shown that the three core networks interact during di-
vergent thinking via cortico-striatal–thalamo-cortical loops [24,34–36].
The extensive connectivity between the SN and CEN, and subcortical
structures like the dorsomedial thalamus and the putamen on the one
hand and the anterior thalamus and the dorsal caudate nucleus on the
other hand being important in this light [25].
It has been shown that the thalamus, one of the aforementioned
subcortical structures, together with the dopamine 2 (D2) receptor
system, play an important role in divergent thinking. Decreased D
2
receptor densities are suggested to lower thalamic gating thresholds,
increasing thalamo-cortical information flow, which might lead to en-
hanced performance on divergent thinking tests [36]. The role of do-
pamine (DA) in creative thinking has been suggested by multiple stu-
dies [37–39] with too high levels being linked with impaired divergent
thinking and medium levels to high levels of flexible thinking [37–39].
Of note, the activity of DA neurons in the SN, more specific the
ventral tegmental area (VTA), is under the excitatory control of ser-
otonin (5-HT) 2A receptors in the PFC [25,40]; the 5-HT
2A
receptors
being the principle site via which psychedelics exert their effects [17].
Psychedelics and creativity networks
A decrement in the functional connectivity in parts of the DMN was
demonstrated after administration psychedelics [41,42]. A hypothe-
sized consequence of this effect being enhanced cognitive flexibility and
creative thinking [43]. Furthermore, the increased frontal activation
and divergent prefrontal-subcortical activation pattern induced by
psychedelics might be attributed to a disruption of thalamic gating of
sensory and cognitive information. Thalamic gating is under the control
of glutamatergic cortico-striatal pathways projecting to thalamic nuclei
[13]. It is known that psychedelics have secondary effects on gluta-
matergic, dopaminergic, and noradrenergic pathways [13,14] and that
stimulation of the 5-HT
2A
receptors, can lead to an alteration of tha-
lamo-cortical transmission [13,44,45].
Psychedelics, personal factors and creativity
Psychedelics generate positive mood effects in healthy participants
[12,46] which lead to openness to novel experiences [47,48], and in-
creases in empathy [49]. The ‘facilitatory theory’proposes that positive
mood states tend to result in activation of a rich and complex set of
positive memories and thoughts, which promotes flexibility and in-
novation [50–52]. Furthermore two personality traits, openness to ex-
perience and empathy have been linked with enhanced divergent
thinking [48,53].
Psychedelics, personal factors, creativity and brain networks
The induction of positive mood has been associated with increased
activity in the left dlPFC [52], a brain regions which has been
associated with enhanced divergent thinking and the goal-directed
planning of novel solutions [54–56]. Numerous studies have reported a
positive relationship between creativity and openness [27,48,57] and
the trait has been studied in relation to the neurobiological basis of
creativity [28]. Apparently both openness and creativity are associated
with increased functional connectivity in the DMN [28]. With respect to
empathy a positive relation between levels of empathy and creativity
has been shown [58]. Both divergent thinking and empathizing have
been associated with the DMN [25] and activity in this network has
shown to be increased during high-level social cognitive tasks
[30,59,60].
Psychedelics, personal factors, creativity and neurotransmitters
Openness seems to facilitate awareness of both one’s own and
others’emotions and is related to empathy [28]. Research has shown
that empathy [61,62] and openness to experience [63] are positively
related to oxytocin levels; intranasal administration of oxytocin led to
higher levels of empathy in response to positive and negative valence
stimuli [61] and to higher self-ratings of openness [63]. Interestingly,
De Dreu and colleagues (2014) showed that intranasal application of
oxytocin can also lead to enhanced divergent thinking and creative
performance [64].
It is suggested that the link between creativity and oxytocin is
mediated by DA [64]. The interaction between oxytocin and DA sys-
tems is supported by animal research where co-located oxytocin and D
2
receptors in the striatum played an important role in social and emo-
tional behavior [65,66]. Elevated striatal DA is often associated with
reduced DA in the PFC and reduced latent inhibition [67]. Latent in-
hibition is a filtering mechanism which tags novel information as re-
levant. When this mechanism is reduced, known stimuli or information
is treated as novel, independently of the number of times we have seen
it before. This reduced filtering has been associated with elevated
creativity [2,68].
Psychedelic model to study the creative mind
Psilocybin has been shown to produce a well-controllable altered
state of consciousness marked by stimulation of affect, enhanced ability
for introspection, increased empathy [69,70]. It has been widely used in
psychopharmacological research without reports of severe adverse
events [46,70,71]. Placebo-controlled mechanistic experimental studies
in healthy volunteers being administered psilocybin in combination
with a D
2
R, 5-HT
2A
R and oxytocin receptors blockers when assessing
flexible thinking, mood states, openness and empathy, will shed light on
the neurotransmitters involved in the facilitation of psychedelic-in-
duced flexible thinking. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (
1
H
MRS), a non-invasive neuroimaging technique that allows in vivo
quantification of glutamate-related metabolites in localized brain re-
gions [72], will help determining the role of glutamate in this process.
Functional connectivity analysis will allow determining the network
underlying psychedelic-induced flexible thinking.
It is hypothesized that blockade of 5-HT
2A
receptors will lead to an
absence of effects on glutamatergic levels and divergent thinking.
Furthermore it is hypothesized that heightened empathy and openness
will lead to enhanced divergent thinking and that D
2
R blockade and/or
oxytocin receptor blockade in combination with psilocybin will lead to
the absence of an oxytocin response, and no enhancement in divergent
thinking.
Psilocybin as tool to investigate the neurobiology underlying the
creative mind will help to answer the question why psychedelics can be
beneficial in the treatment of psychopathologies in which flexible
thinking is disturbed.
K.P.C. Kuypers Medical Hypotheses 115 (2018) 13–16
14
Conflict of interest statement
The author has no conflict of interest to declare.
References
[1] Hennessey BA, Amabile TM. Creativity. Annu Rev Psychol 2009;61(1):569–98.
[2] Carson S. Leveraging the 'mad genius' debate: why we need a neuroscience of
creativity and psychopathology. Front Hum Neurosci 2014;8:1–4.
[3] Runco MA. Divergent thinking. Westport, CT, US: Ablex Publishing; 1991. xi, 199 p.
[4] Todd AR, Forstmann M, Burgmer P, Brooks AW, Galinsky AD. Anxious and ego-
centric: how specific emotions influence perspective taking. J Exp Psychol Gen
2015;144(2):374–91. PubMed PMID: 25602753. Epub 2015/01/21. eng.
[5] Nietlisbach G, Maercker A, Rossler W, Haker H. Are empathic abilities impaired in
posttraumatic stress disorder? Psychol Rep 2010;106(3):832–44. PubMed PMID:
20712172. Epub 2010/08/18. eng.
[6] Parlar M, Frewen P, Nazarov A, Oremus C, MacQueen G, Lanius R, et al. Alterations
in empathic responding among women with posttraumatic stress disorder asso-
ciated with childhood trauma. Brain and Behavior 2014;4(3):381–9. PubMed PMID:
24944867. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC4055188. eng.
[7] Davis MA. Understanding the relationship between mood and creativity: a meta-
analysis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2009;108(1):25–38.
[8] Baas M, De Dreu CK, Nijstad BA. A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity
research: hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychol Bull
2008;134(6):779–806. PubMed PMID: 18954157. Epub 2008/10/29. eng.
[9] Aldao A, Nolen-Hoeksema S, Schweizer S. Emotion-regulation strategies across
psychopathology: a meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev 2010;30(2):217–37.
PubMed PMID: 20015584. Epub 2009/12/18. eng.
[10] Tull MT, Barrett HM, McMillan ES, Roemer L. A Preliminary investigation of the
relationship between emotion regulation difficulties and posttraumatic stress
symptoms. Behav Ther 2007;38(3):303–13.
[11] Harman WW, McKim RH, Mogar RE, Fadiman J, StolaroffMJ. Psychedelic agents in
creative problem-solving: a pilot study. Psychol Rep 1966;19:211–27.
[12] Sessa B. Is it time to revisit the role of psychedelic drugs in enhancing human
creativity? J Psychopharmacol 2008;22(8):821–7.
[13] Geyer MA, Vollenweider FX. Serotonin research: contributions to understanding
psychoses. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2008;29(9):445–53.
[14] Majic T, Schmidt T, Gallinat J. Peak experiences and the afterglow phenomenon:
when and how do therapeutic effects of hallucinogens depend on psychedelic ex-
periences? J Psychopharmacol 2015;1–13.
[15] Kuypers KPC, Riba J, de la Fuente Revenga M, Barker S, Theunissen EL, Ramaekers
JG. Ayahuasca enhances creative divergent thinking while decreasing conventional
convergent thinking. Psychopharmacology 2016;1–9.
[16] Frecska E, More CE, Vargha A, Luna LE. Enhancement of creative expression and
entoptic phenomena as after-effects of repeated ayahuasca ceremonies. J
Psychoactive Drugs 2012;44(3):191–9. PubMed PMID: 23061318. Epub 2012/10/
16. eng.
[17] Vollenweider FX, Kometer M. The neurobiology of psychedelic drugs: implications
for the treatment of mood disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci 2010;11:642–51.
[18] Carhart-Harris RL, Goodwin GM. The therapeutic potential of psychedelic drugs:
past, present, and future. Neuropsychopharmacology 2017. PubMed PMID:
28443617. Epub 2017/04/27. eng.
[19] Nichols DE, Johnson MW, Nichols CD. Psychedelics as medicines: an emerging new
paradigm. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2017;101(2):209–19. PubMed PMID: 28019026.
Epub 2016/12/27. eng.
[20] Bogenschutz MP, Forcehimes AA, Pommy JA, Wilcox CE, Barbosa P, Strassman RJ.
Psilocybin-assisted treatment for alcohol dependence: a proof-of-concept study. J
Psychopharmacol 2015;29(3):289–99. PubMed PMID: 25586396.
[21] Bogenschutz MP, Pommy JM. Therapeutic mechanisms of classic hallucinogens in
the treatment of addictions: from indirect evidence to testable hypotheses. Drug
Test Anal 2012;4(7–8):543–55.
[22] Carhart-Harris RL, Bolstridge M, Rucker J, Day CMJ, Erritzoe D, Kaelen M, et al.
Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: an open-
label feasibility study. The Lancet Psychiatry 2016;3(7):619–27.
[23] Pinho AL, Ullén F, Castelo-Branco M, Fransson P, de Manzano Ö. Addressing a
paradox: dual strategies for creative performance in introspective and extrospective
networks. Cereb Cortex 2015 June;17:2015.
[24] Jung RE, Mead BS, Carrasco J, Flores RA. The structure of creative cognition in the
human brain. Front Hum Neurosci 2013;7.
[25] Bressler SL, Menon V. Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods
and principles. TrendsCogn Sci 2010;14(6):277–90.
[26] Gerlach KD, Spreng RN, Gilmore AW, Schacter DL. Solving future problems: default
network and executive activity associated with goal-directed mental simulations.
NeuroImage 2011;55(4):1816–24.
[27] Takeuchi H, Taki Y, Hashizume H, Sassa Y, Nagase T, Nouchi R, et al. The asso-
ciation between resting functional connectivity and creativity. Cereb Cortex
2012;22:2921–9.
[28] DeYoung CG. Openness/intellect: dimension of personality reflecting cognitive
exploration. In: Cooper ML, Larsen RJ, editors. APA handbook of personality and
social psychology: personality processes and individual differences. 4. Washington
DC: American Psychological Association; 2014. p. 369–99.
[29] Uddin LQ, Menon V. The anterior insula in autism: under-connected and under-
examined. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2009;33(8):1198–203.
[30] Walter H. Social cognitive neuroscience of empathy: concepts, circuits, and genes.
Emotion Rev 2012;4(1):9–17.
[31] Fan Y, Duncan NW, de Greck M, NorthoffG. Is there a core neural network in
empathy? An fMRI based quantitative meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev
2011;35(3):903–11.
[32] Beaty RE, Benedek M, Kaufman SB, Silvia PJ. Default and executive network cou-
pling supports creative idea production. Sci Rep 2015;5:10964.
[33] Perlovsky LI, Levine DS. The drive for creativity and the escape from creativity:
neurocognitive mechanisms. Cognitive Computation. 2012;4:292–305.
[34] Chávez-Eakle RA, Graff-Guerrero A, García-Reyna J-C, Vaugier V, Cruz-Fuentes C.
Cerebral blood flow associated with creative performance: a comparative study.
NeuroImage. 2007;38:519–28.
[35] Fink A, Grabner RH, Benedek M, Reishofer G, Hauswirth V, Fally M, et al. The
creative brain: investigation of brain activity during creative problem solving by
means of EEG and FMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 2009;30(3):734–48.
[36] de Manzano Ö, Cervenka S, Karabanov A, Farde L, Ullén F. Thinking outside a less
intact box: thalamic dopamine D2 receptor densities are negatively related to
psychometric creativity in healthy individuals. PLoS one 2010;5(5):e10670.
[37] Akbari Chermahini S, Hommel B. The (b)link between creativity and dopamine:
spontaneous eye blink rates predict and dissociate divergent and convergent
thinking. Cognition 2010;115:458–65.
[38] Mohamed AD. The effects of modafinil on convergent and divergent thinking of
creativity: a randomized controlled trial. The Journal of Creative Behavior 2014. n/
a–n/a.
[39] Kowal MA, Hazekamp A, Colzato LS, van Steenbergen H, van der Wee NJA, Durieux
J, et al. Cannabis and creativity: highly potent cannabis impairs divergent thinking
in regular cannabis users. Psychopharmacology 2015;232:1123–34.
[40] Bortolozzi A, Díaz-Mataix L, Scorza MC, Celada P, Artigas F. The activation of 5-
HT2A receptors in prefrontal cortex enhances dopaminergic activity. J Neurochem
2005;95(6):1597–607.
[41] Carhart-Harris RL, Erritzoe D, Williams T, Stone JM, Reed LJ, Colasanti A, et al.
Neural correlates of the psychedelic state as determined by fMRI studies with psi-
locybin. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2012;109(6):2138–43.
[42] Palhano-Fontes F, Andrade KC, Tofoli LF, santos AC, Crippa JAS, Hallak JEC, et al.
The psychedelic state induced by Ayahuasca modulates the activity and con-
nectivity of the default mode network. PLoS one 2015;1–13.
[43] Carhart-Harris RL, Kaelen M, Nutt D. How do hallucinogens work on the brain?
Psychologist 2014;27(9):662–5.
[44] Nichols DE. Hallucinogens. Pharmacol Ther. 2004 2//;101(2):131–81.
[45] Fantegrossi WE, Murnane KS, Reissig CJ. The behavioral pharmacology of hallu-
cinogens. Biochem Pharmacol 2008;75(1):17–33.
[46] Kraehenmann R, Preller KH, Scheidegger M, Pokorny T, Bosch OG, Seifritz E, et al.
Silocybin-induced decrease in amygdala reactivity correlates with enhanced posi-
tive mood in healthy volunteers. Biol Psychiatry 2014.
[47] Hysek CM, Schmid Y, Simmler LD, Domes G, Heinrichs M, Eisenegger C, et al.
MDMA enhances emotional empathy and prosocial behavior. Soc Cogn Affective
Neurosci 2014;9:1645–52.
[48] Sánchez-Ruiz MH-TDP-GJBMPK. The relationship between trait emotional in-
telligence and creativity across subject domains. Motivation Emotion
2011;35(4):461–73.
[49] Kuypers KPC, de la Torre R, Farre M, Yubero-Lahoz S, Dziobek I, van den Bos W,
et al. No evidence that MDMA-induced enhancement of emotional empathy is re-
lated to peripheral oxytocin levels or 5-HT1a receptor activation. PLoS one
2014;9(6):e100719.
[50] Baas M, DeDreu C, Nijstad B. A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity re-
search: hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychol Bull
2008;134:779–806.
[51] Baas M, De Dreu CKW, Nijstad BA. When prevention promotes creativity: the role of
mood, regulatory focus, and regulatory closure. J Pers Soc Psychol
2011;100(5):794–809. PubMed PMID: 2011-04646-001.
[52] Mitchell RLC, Phillips LH. The psychological, neurochemical and functional neu-
roanatomical mediators of the effects of positive and negative mood on executive
functions. Neuropsychologia 2007;45(4):617–29.
[53] Carlozzi AF, Bull KS, Eells GT, Hurlburt JD. Empathy as related to creativity,
dogmatism, and expressiveness. J Psychol 1995;129(4):365–73.
[54] Huang P, Qiu L, Shen L, Zhang Y, Song Z, Qi Z, et al. Evidence for a left-over-right
inhibitory mechanism during figural creative thinking in healthy nonartists. Hum
Brain Mapp 2013;34(10):2724–32.
[55] Aziz-Zadeh L, Liew S-L, Dandekar F. Exploring the neural correlates of visual
creativity. Soc Cogn Affective Neurosci 2013;8(4):475–80.
[56] Shah C, Erhard K, Ortheil H-J, Kaza E, Kessler C, Lotze M. Neural correlates of
creative writing: an fMRI Study. Hum Brain Mapp 2013;34(5):1088–101.
[57] Li W, Li X, Huang L, Kong X, Yang W, Wei D, et al. Brain structure links trait
creativity to openness to experience. Soc Cogn Affective Neurosci
2015;10(2):191–8.
[58] Takeuchi H, Taki Y, Sekiguchi A, Nouchi R, Kotozaki Y, Nakagawa S, et al.
Creativity measured by divergent thinking is associated with two axes of autistic
characteristics. Front Psychol 2014;5. English.
[59] Takeuchi H, Taki Y, Nouchi R, Sekiguchi A, Hashizume H, Sassa Y, et al. Association
between resting-state functional connectivity and empathizing/systemizing.
NeuroImage 2014;99:312–22.
[60] Shamay-Tsoory SG. The neural bases for empathy. Neuroscientist
2011;17(1):18–24.
[61] Hurlemann R, Patin A, Onur OA, Cohen MX, Baumgartner T, Metzler S, et al.
Oxytocin enhances amygdala-dependent, socially reinforced learning and emo-
tional empathy in humans. J Neurosci 2010;30(14):4999–5007.
[62] Palgi S, Klein E, Shamay-Tsoory SG. Intranasal administration of oxytocin increases
K.P.C. Kuypers Medical Hypotheses 115 (2018) 13–16
15
compassion toward women. Soc Cogn Affective Neurosci 2015;10(3):311–7.
[63] Cardoso C, Ellenbogen M, Linnen A-M. Acute intranasal oxytocin improves positive
self-perceptions of personality. Psychopharmacology 2012;220(4):741–9. English.
[64] De Dreu CKW, Baas M, Roskes M, Sligte DJ, Ebstein RP, Chew SH, et al. Oxytonergic
circuitry sustains and enables creative cognition in humans. Soc Cogn Affective
Neurosci 2014;9(8):1159–65.
[65] Baskerville TA, Douglas AJ. Dopamine and oxytocin interactions underlying be-
haviors: potential contributions to behavioral disorders. CNS Neurosci Ther
2010;16(3):e92–123.
[66] Romero-Fernandez W, Borroto-Escuela DO, Agnati LF, Fuxe K. Evidence for the
existence of dopamine d2-oxytocin receptor heteromers in the ventral and dorsal
striatum with facilitatory receptor-receptor interactions. Mol Psychiatry
2013;18(8):849–50.
[67] DeYoung CG, Grazioplene RG, Peterson JB. From madness to genius: the Openness/
Intellect trait domain as a paradoxical simplex. J Res Pers 2012;46(1):63–78.
[68] Carson SH, Peterson JB, Higgins DM. Decreased latent inhibition is associated with
increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. J Pers Soc Psychol
2003;85(3):499–506. PubMed PMID: 2003-07329-008.
[69] Passie T, Seifert J, Schneider U, Emrich HM. The pharmacology of psilocybin.
Addict Biol 2002;7(4):357–64.
[70] Pokorny T, Preller KH, Kometer M, Dziobek I, Vollenweider FX. Effect of psilocybin
on empathy and moral decision-making. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2017.
[71] TylšF, Páleníček T, Horáček J. Psilocybin –Summary of knowledge and new per-
spectives. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2014;24(3):342–56.
[72] Schubert F, Gallinat J, Seifert F, Rinneberg H. Glutamate concentrations in human
brain using single voxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 3 Tesla.
NeuroImage 2004;21(4):1762–71.
K.P.C. Kuypers Medical Hypotheses 115 (2018) 13–16
16