ArticlePDF Available

Molecular analysis of CTX-M genes among ESBL producing in Pseudomonas aeru-ginosa isolated from clinical samples by Multiplex-PCR

Authors:

Abstract

Introduction: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the most common pathogens involved in hospital infections, which today has been considered for resistance to a wide range of antibiotics. The causes of drug resistance in P.aeruginosa isolates are the production of broad-spectrum beta-lactamase enzymes. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of CTX-M1, CTX-M2, CTX-M3 genes in P.aeruginosa isolated from Hospitals and health centers in Marand city, East Azarbijan. Methods: Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were collected from different samples of patients referring to hospi-tals and clinics of Marand city during one year from October 2016 to October 2017 and after determining the phe-notypic identity and antibiogram test, the double-disk test of ESBLs phenotype was evaluated in P.aeruginosa bac-teria. Then bacterial DNA was extracted and evaluated by PCR method using specific primers for CTX-M1,CTX-M2 and CTX-M3 genes. Results: The findings showed of the 85 Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria, the highest resistance was to amikacin antibiotics (82.35%), nalidixic acid (80%) and ceftazidime (72.94%), and the highest susceptibility was observed to ampicillin(38.82%) and cefotaxime (38.82%) %). There was no significant relationship between age, sex, and P.ae-ruginosa infections (P> 0.05). The highest gene frequencies of ESBLs are related to the genes of CTX-M1 (29 samples), CTX-M2 (24 samples) and CTX-M3 (11 samples), respectively. Conclusion: The studied genes in this research were all on the chromosome of P.aeruginosa bacteria. Therefore, further examination of ESBL genes such as the CTX-M1 gene seems necessary to control this bacterium. Keywords: P.aeruginosa, Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases, CTX-M1, CTX-M2, CTX-M3.
Molecular analysis of CTX-M genes among ESBL producing in Pseudomonas aeru-
ginosa isolated from clinical samples by Multiplex-PCR
Received: Jan 01, 2018; Revised: Feb. 18, 2018; Accepted: Feb. 20, 2018
HOZAN; a Scientific Journal of Environmental Sciences
https://sites.google.com/site/hozanjournalcom/Home
PISSN: 2476-3764; eISSN: 2476-5716
Original article
Abstract
Introduction: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the most common pathogens involved in hospital infections,
which today has been considered for resistance to a wide range of antibiotics. The causes of drug resistance in
P.aeruginosa isolates are the production of broad-spectrum beta-lactamase enzymes. The aim of this study was to
determine the frequency of CTX-M1, CTX-M2, CTX-M3 genes in P.aeruginosa isolated from Hospitals and health
centers in Marand city, East Azarbijan.
Methods: Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were collected from different samples of patients referring to hospi-
tals and clinics of Marand city during one year from October 2016 to October 2017 and after determining the phe-
notypic identity and antibiogram test, the double-disk test of ESBLs phenotype was evaluated in P.aeruginosa bac-
teria. Then bacterial DNA was extracted and evaluated by PCR method using specific primers for CTX-M1,CTX-
M2 and CTX-M3 genes.
Results: The findings showed of the 85 Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria, the highest resistance was to amikacin
antibiotics (82.35%), nalidixic acid (80%) and ceftazidime (72.94%), and the highest susceptibility was observed to
ampicillin(38.82%) and cefotaxime (38.82%) %). There was no significant relationship between age, sex, and P.ae-
ruginosa infections (P> 0.05). The highest gene frequencies of ESBLs are related to the genes of CTX-M1 (29
samples), CTX-M2 (24 samples) and CTX-M3 (11 samples), respectively.
Conclusion: The studied genes in this research were all on the chromosome of P.aeruginosa bacteria. Therefore,
further examination of ESBL genes such as the CTX-M1 gene seems necessary to control this bacterium.
Keywords: P.aeruginosa, Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases, CTX-M1, CTX-M2, CTX-M3.
This article may be cited as: Jafari-Sales A, Shadi-Dizaji A. Molecular analysis of CTX-M
genes among ESBL producing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from clinical samples by Mul-
tiplex-PCR. HOZAN J Environment Sci; 2018:2(5):17-29.
Abolfazl Jafari-Sales *1, Azizeh Shadi-Dizaji 2
1. Department of Microbiology, Kazeroon branch, Islamic Azad University, Kazeroon, Iran.
2. Department of Biotechnology, Ataturk University, Turkey.
(*Corresponding Author: a.jafari_1392@yahoo.com ); Tel: +98(0)914-7611841; Fax: +98(0)414-2274746
2018, vol. 2 (no. 5): page 17-29 HOZAN J Environment Sci

CTX-M


Multiplex-PCR




 a.jafari_1392@yahoo.com








CTX-M1,CTX-M2,CTX-M3





ESBL


DNAPCR
CTX-M1 CTX-M2CTX-M3




CTX-M124CTX-M2CTX-M3



ESBLCTX-M1


CTX-M1, CTX-M2, CTX-M3

CTX-M





   
       
 
     

  
 

 



 -








    

 -




  AmpC 
OprD
   
IIIV

   





     
 




     
ESBLESBL
 
        




CTX-M

 -
  Kluyvera


CTX-M
CTX-M



CTX-M




    






2018, vol. 2 (no. 5): page 17-29 HOZAN J Environment Sci
  
 
 S
2
H
   
DNaseO-F

TSBTryptic soy broth 
Kirby Baur
NCCLS



 



ESBL
  ESBL

      Invitek Stratec
Business    DNA 

CTX-M1
CTX-M2CTX-M3     
PCR
Multiplex PCRMultiplex PCR
µL PCR µL
dNTPµL  µLTag polymeraseµL
MgCl2µLDNA

mg/mL
 Gel Document USA, Bio Rad 

SPSS
>p




±




p >
      



   p>
ESBL

-



CTX-M






ESBL

   
CTX-M1CTX-M2
CTX-
M3 
ESBLESBL

     
ESBL   
ESBL
     -
<p




PCRM: DNA
Ladder 1: CTX-M12: CTX-M23: CTX-M3CTX-M1
54%
46%
 
0
10
20
30
40
50
60


   




2018, vol. 2 (no. 5): page 17-29 HOZAN J Environment Sci







MDR


  
 
   
 

MDR 
    

MDR-



   
    
   
    
 



Wesam



  Rajat Rakesh 
    
Kianpour

    Ahadi

       







 -
JemimaVerghese
ESBL
        
ESBLPCR



ESBL

ESBL
  
    
0
20
40
60
80
100
CTXM1 CTXM2 CTXM3


ESBL + ESBL -

CTX-M




ESBL
   

       

ESBL


       


     


ESBL



ESBL




ESBL


       VEB,OXA-
10,CTX-M,PER-1,GES-1,OXA-1,OXA-4

ESBLCTX-M
     
CTX-M1
CTX-M1  
CTX-M2  CTX-M3 


CTX-M
 CTX-M1  CTX-M2
CTX-M3
CTX-M1CTX-M2CTX-
M3

ESBL
 CTX-M2
ESBL
 CTX-M1  




CTX-M


      


   



  


-






2018, vol. 2 (no. 5): page 17-29 HOZAN J Environment Sci
1. Acton A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: new
insights for the healthcare professional.
Scholarly Brief. Scholarly Editions. 2013; pp:
11-32.
2. Quinn P, Markey B, Leonard F, Hartigan
P, Fanning S, Fitzpatrick E. Veterinarymi-
crobiology and microbial disease. 2ndedition.
John Wiley & Sons, 2011; pp: 225-243 .
3. Vanhems P,lepape A, Savey A, Jambou
P, Fabry J. Nosocomial pulmonary infec-
tion by antimicrobial resistant bacteria
of patients hospitalized in intensive care
units risk factors and survival. J Hosp
Infect2000; 45(2):98-106.
4. Ryall B, Davies JC, Wilson R, Shoemark A,
Williams HD. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, cya-
nide accumulation and lung function in cystic
fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis bronchiecta-
sis patients. Eur Respir J. 2008; 32:740-7.
5. Hacker J, Carniel E. Ecological fitness, ge-
nomic islands and bacterial pathogenicity a
Darwinian view of the evolution of microbes.
EMBO Rep. 2001; 2:376-81.
6. Tramper-Stranders GA, van der ENT CK,
Wolfs TF. Detection of Pseudomonas aeru-
ginosa in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst
Fibros. 2005; 54:37-43.
7. Sales AJ, Fathi R, Mobaiyen H, et al. Molec-
ular Study of the Prevalence of CTX-M1,
CTX-M2, CTXM3 in Pseudomonas aeru-
ginosa Isolated from Clinical Samples in Ta-
briz Town, Iran. Electronic J Biol, 13:3
8. Rajat Rakesh M, Ninama Govind L, Mistry
Kalpesh, Parmar Rosy, Patel Kanu, Vegad
MM. National Journal of Medical Research
Natl J Med Res. 2012; 2(2):156-9.
9. Mahmoud AB, Zahran WA, Hindawi GR,
Labib AZ, Galal R. Prevalence of Multi-
drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosain
patients with nosocomial infections at a
university hospital in Egypt, with special
reference to typing methods. J Virol Micro-
biol 2013; 2013: ID290047
10. Pool k. Efflux-mediated resistance to fluoro-
quinolones in gram-negative bacteria. Anti-
microbials. Agents Chemoth. 2000;
44(22):3341.
11. Rastegar Lari A, Alaghebandan R, Akhlaghi
L. Burn wound infections and antimicrobial
resistance in Tehran, Iran .An increasing
problem Burns. 2005;28: 174-8
12. Brooks GF, Butel J, Morse SA. Jawetz Med-
ical Microbiology, 23th edition, New York,
McGraw-Hill. 2004; 262-4.
13. Gailiene G, Pavilonis A, Kareiviene V. The
peculiarities of Pseudomonas aeruginosa re-
sistance to antibiotics and prevalence of
serogroups. Medicina (Kaunas). 2007; 43
(1):36-42.
14. Philippon A, Arlet G, Lagrange PH (1994)
Origin and import of plasmid- mediated ex-
tended- spectrum B-lactamases. Eurjclin mi-
crobial Infect Dis,V(13) .S17-29.

CTX-M



15. Jarlier V, Nicolas MH, Fornier G. (1988) Ex-
tended broad- spectrum B Lactomases con-
ferring transferable resistance to newer B lac-
tam agents in Enterobacteriaceae: Hospital
prevalence and susceptibility patterns. Rev.
infect. Dis. V (10). P:867-878
16. Jafari Sales A, Mobaiyen H. Frequency and
resistance patterns in clinical isolates of
Escherichia coli Extended Spectrum Beta
Lactamase producing treatment Centers in
Marand city, Iran. NCMBJ. 2017; 7 (26) :19-
26
17. Dizaji AS, Fathi R, Sales AJ. Molecular study
of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (TEM-
1) gene in Escherichia Coli isolates collected
from Ostad Alinasab Hospital in Tabriz Iran.
Marmara Medical Journal. 2016; 29(1):35-
40.
18. Tzouvelekis LS, Tzelepi E, Tassios PT,
Legakis NJ. CTX-M-type beta-lactamases:
an emerging group of extended-spectrum en-
zymes. Int J Antimicrob Agents.
2000;14(2):137-42
19. Falagas ME, Karageorgopoulos DE. Ex-
tended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing or-
ganisms. J Hosp Infect. 2009; 73(4):345-54.
20. Mirzaee M, Pourmand MR, Chitsaz M,
Mansouri S. [Antibiotic resistance to third
generation cephalosporin due to CTX-M-
Type extended-spectrum β-lactamases in
clinical isolates of Escherichia coli (Per-
sian)]. Iranian Journal of Public Health. 2009;
38(1):10-7.
21. Khan SA, Nawaz MS, et al. Molecular char-
acterization of multidrug resistant Enterococ-
cus spp. from poultry and dairy farms: detec-
tion of virulence and vancomycin resistance
gene markers by PCR. Mol Cell Probes
2005;19 (1): 2734.
22. Bameri, Z., Chitsaz, M. and Owlia, P. Detec-
tion of CTX-M Lactamases in Isolated
Klebsiella pneumonia. Iran J Pathol. 2010;
5(3), 137-42.
23. Chaudhari V, Gunjal S, Mehta M. Antibiotic
resistance patterns of Pseudomonas aeru-
ginosa in a tertiary care hospital in Central In-
dia. International Journal of Medical Science
and Public Health. Int J Med Sci Public
Health. 2013; 2(2). 386-9
24. Wirth FW, Picoli SU, Cantarelli VV, Gon-
çalves ALS, Brust FR, Santos LMO, et
al. Metallo-ß-Lactamase and Pseudomonas
aeruginosa in two hospitals from Southern
Brazil. Braz J Infect Dis 2009; 13:170-2.
25. Das Neves MT, de Lorenzo ME, Almeida
RA, Fotaleza CM. Antimicrobial use and in-
cidence of multidrug resistant Pseudomonas
aeruginosa in a teaching hospital: An ecolog-
ical approach. "Rev Soc Bras Med Trop.
2010; 43(6):629-32.
26. Lim KT, Yasin RM, et al. Genetic finger-
printing and antimicrobial susceptibility pro-
files of Pseudomonas aeruginosa hospital iso-
lates in Malaysia. J Microbial Immunol In-
fect. 2009; 42(3):197-209.
27. Mirsalehian A, Feizabadi M, et al. Detection
of VEB-1, OXA- 10 and PER-1 genotypes in
extended spectrum beta-lactamase-producing
Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated
from burn patients. Burns. 2010; 36(1):70-4.
28. Ullah F, Malik SA, Ahmed J. Antimicrobial
2018, vol. 2 (no. 5): page 17-29 HOZAN J Environment Sci
susceptibility and ESBL prevalence in Pseu-
domonas aeruginosa isolated from burn pa-
tients in the North West of Pakistan. Burns.
2009; 35(7):1020-25.
29. Tredget EE, Shankowsky HA, Rennie R,
Burrell RE, Logsetty S. Pseudomonas infec-
tions in the thermally injured patient. Burns.
2004; 30(1):3-26.
30. Salehi, M., Hekmatdoost, M., Hosseini, F.
Quinolone resistance associated with efflux
pumps mexAB-oprM in clinical isolates of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of Micro-
bial World, 2014; 6(4): 290-298.
31. Mihani F, Khosravi A. MBL-producing
Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated
from patients with burn wound infections and
PCR methods to identify blaVIM, blaIMP
genes. Iran J Microbiol. 2007; 1(1): 23-31.
32. Wesam, A. and Hassanein. Molecular Iden-
tification of Resistant Pseudomonas Aeru-
ginosa Wt. Aust. j. basic appl. sci. 2009; 3,
2144-53.
33. Taghvaee R, Shojapour M, Sadeghi A,
Pourbabaie A. The study of antibiotic re-
sistance pattern and the frequency of ex-
tended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) in
Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated
from medical centers in Arak city, Iran. Qom
Univ Med Sci J. 2013;7(4):36-41
34. Kianpour F, Havaei SA, Hosseini MM. Eval-
uation of Pseudomonas aeroginosa isolated
from cutaneous infections and determination
of drug resistance pattern in patients of Al-
zahra hospital in Esfahan. J Isfahan Med Sch.
2010; 28(110):503-9.
35. Ahadi A, Sharif Zadeh A, Golshani Z. Identi-
fication of antibiotic resistance patterns of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from pa-
tients admitted with multiple resistances.
Journal of Veterinary Laboratory Research.
2012; 4(1):119-22.
36. Pitout JD, Gregson DB, Poirel L, McClure
JA, Le P, Church DL. Detection of Pseudo-
monas aeruginosa producing metallo beta
lactamases in a large centralized laboratory. J
Clin Microbiol. 2005; 43(7):3129-35.
37. Jemima, A.S. and Verghese, S. (2008) Multi-
plex PCR for blaCTX-M &blaSHV in the ex-
tended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) pro-
ducing Gram-negative isolates. Indian J Med
Res. 128, 313-317.
38. Kownani M, Baserisalehi M, Bahador N. Fre-
quency of Extended Spectrum β-Lactamase
Genes in Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Isolates
from Shiraz Hospital, Iran. J Isfahan Med Sch
2013; 31(243): 1007-17
39. Lee S, Park YJ, kim M, Lee HK, Han K.
Prevalence of Ambler class A and D beta -
lactamases among clinical isolates of Pseudo-
monas aerugionsa in Korea. J Antimicrob
Chemother. 2005; 56: 122-7.
40. Celenza G, Pellegrini C, Caccamo M. Spread
of bla (CTX-M-type) and bla(PER-2) beta-
lactamase genes in clinical isolates from Bo-
livian hospitals. J Antimicrob Chemother.

CTX-M



2006; 57: 975-8.
41. Strateva T, Ouzounova-Raykova V, et al.
Problematic clinical isolates of Pseudomonas
aeruginosa from the university hospitals in
Sofia, Bulgaria: current status of antimicro-
bial resistance and prevailing resistance
mechanisms. J Med Microbiol. 2007; 56:
956-63.
42. Mirsalehian A. Broad-spectrum Of beta-lac-
tamase in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates
in burn patient. Journal of Tehran University
of Medical Sciences. 2008; 66(5): 333-7.
43. Shakibaie M, Shahcheraghi F, Hashemi A,
Saeed Adeli N. Detection of TEM, SHV and
PER Type extended-spectrum β-lactamas
gene among clinical strains of Pseudomonas
aeruginosa isolated from Burnt Patients at
Shafa-Haspital, Kerman, Iran. Iran J Basic
Med Sci. 2008; 11(2): 104-11.
44. Shahcheraghi F, Nasiri S, Noveiri H. The sur-
vey of genes encoding beta-lactamases, in
Esherichia coli resistant to beta-lactam anti-
biotics. IJBMS. 2009; 13(1): 230-7.
45. Farzali Shirehjini F, Amini K, Fatahi H. Iden-
tification of blaCTX-M, blaSHV, and
blaTEM Genes in Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
Strains Isolated from Human and Animal
Samples Using Multiplex-PCR Method. Qom
Univ Med Sci J. 2017; 10 (11) :51-60
46. Shacheraghi, F., Shakibaie, M.R., and
Noveiri, H. Molecular Identification of ESBL
Genes bla GES-1, bla VEB-1,bla CTX-M,bla
OXA-1,bla OXA-4,bla OXA-10 and bla
PER-1 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains
Isolated from Burn Patients by PCR, RFLP
and Sequencing Techniques Int. J. Biol. Sci,
2010;6(3), 138-42.
47. Tavajjohi Z, Moniri R, Khorshidi A, Rohani
M. Detection of the bla Genes (TEM-1, SHV-
1, SHV-5, CTXM-1, CTX-M-2, CTX-M-3,
CTX-M-9, OXA-1, GES-1 and GES-2) in
Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated
from clinical and environmental samples of
Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Kashan . J Zan-
jan Univ Med Sci. 2012; 20(82):42-51.
48. Kownani M, Baserisalehi M, Bahador N. Fre-
quency of extended spectrum β-Lactamase
genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates
from Shiraz hospitals, Iran. J Isfahan Med
Sch. 2013; 31(234):1007-17.
49. Polotto M, Casella T. Detection of Pseudo-
monas aeruginosa harboring blaCTX-M-2,
blaGES-1and blaGES-5, bla IMP-1 and
blaSPM-1 causing infections in Brazilian ter-
tiary-care hospitals. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;
12:176.
50. Chaudhary M, Payasi A. Molecular charac-
terization and In vitro susceptibilities of ß lac-
tamase producing Escherichia coli,
Klebsiella species, Acinetobacter baumannii,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococ-
cus aureus to CSE1034 and other ß-lactams.
Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2014; 7:217-23.
51. Naas T, Cuzon G, Truong H, Bernabeu S,
Nordmann P. Evaluation of a DNA microar-
ray, the check-points ESBL/KPC array, for
rapid detection of TEM, SHV, and CTX-M
extended spectrum-β-lactamases and KPC
carbapenemases. Antimicrob Agents
Chemother. 2010; 54(8):3086-92.
52. Yamasaki K, Komatsu M, et al. Production of
CTX-M-3 extended-spectrum ß-lactamase
2018, vol. 2 (no. 5): page 17-29 HOZAN J Environment Sci
and IMP-1 metallo ß-lactamase by five Gram
negative bacilli: survey of clinical isolates
from seven laboratories collected in 1998 and
2000, in the Kinki region of Japan. J Antimi-
crob Chemother. 2003; 51(3):631-8.
53. .
... Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) is one of the 5 opportunistic human pathogens, especially in immunocompromised patients, which is the cause of hospitalacquired opportunistic infections and carries multiple drug resistance (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). Hospital-acquired infections are one of the significant medical problems in developed and developing countries which cause the spread of infectious diseases in the society (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). ...
Article
Full-text available
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) is one of the most common bacteria isolated from clinical samples, with a rising incidence in hospital infections. This pathogen is inherently resistant to many antibacterial agents. This study aimed to investigate the frequency of carbapenemase genes in P. aeruginosa strains isolated from patients admitted to hospitals in northwestern Iran. A total of 500 P. aeruginosa samples were collected from different clinical samples. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines, and the frequency of the target genes was assessed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The antibiotic resistance results of the samples by disc diffusion method showed that imipenem 98.4%, gentamicin 98%, meropenem 91.8%, amikacin 91.6% and cefepime 91% had the highest resistance; also, out of 500 P. aeruginosa isolates, 309 (61.8%) samples were carbapenemase producers. Using the PCR method, it was determined that the blaOXA-48 (39.16%), blaGES (31.72%), and blaIMP (22.01%) genes were the dominant genes. Our results showed that the prevalence of carbapenemase genes in P. aeruginosa strains isolated from patients admitted to hospitals in northwestern Iran is very high; indicating a need for effective infection control measures to prevent the spread of P. aeruginosa in hospitals.
... Jafari-Sales et al. studied the PCR method for detecting ESBL genes in Escherichia coli isolates. The study showed that fifty-two percent of the isolates contained the TEM gene, which was compatible with the findings of the present study (1,(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31). Recent studies have indicated that resistance to Beta-lactam induced by ESBL is increasing rapidly. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Broad-spectrum antibiotic resistance genes are one of the most common developing resistance genes worldwide. Accordingly, it is of paramount importance to study the extended-spectrum beta-lactamase genes to report them to physicians to select the most appropriate treatment. Objectives: This study aimed to detect three genes of ESBL such as TEM, AmpC, and KPC simultaneously. Methods: Primers were designed for ESBL genes such as TEM, AmpC, and KPC with Genscript software. In this study, control-positive genes were used for the PCR set-up. Fifty isolates of Escherichia coli isolated in the Baqiyatallah Hospital were confirmed and checked by Multiplex PCR. Results: This study revealed that TEM, AmpC, and KPC primers could detect positive control genes. The sensitivity and specificity of the multiplex PCR technique for these genes were 0.001 ng and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: This study revealed that a Multiplex PCR with a sensitivity of 0.001 ng and 100% specificity can detect ESBL genes precisely. Accordingly, the rapid and precise detection of the antibiotic resistance genes and the recommendation of an appropriate treatment pattern can decrease the distribution of antibiotic resistance occurrence and economic cost.
... Recently, CTX-M-3 was identified from several P. aeruginosa isolates from China [47] . Jafari [48] reported that in Marand city, East Azarbijan of the 85 P. aeruginosa, the highest resistance was to amikacin antibiotics (82.35 %), nalidixic acid (80 %) and ceftazidime (72.94 %), and the highest susceptibility was observed to ampicillin (38.82 %) and cefotaxime (38.82 %). The highest gene frequencies of ESBLs are related to the genes of CTX-M1 (34.12 %), CTX-M2 (28.24 %) and CTX-M3 (12.94 %), respectively. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Introduction and purpose: With the increasing antibiotic resistance of bacteria, it has provided the basis for replacing antimicrobial agents with plant origin and with fewer side effects. This study was conducted with the aim of investigating the antibacterial effects of the ethanolic extract of Carum copticum L. on Klebsiella pneumoniae producing broad-spectrum beta-lactamase. Materials and methods: The ethanolic extract of the plant was prepared by the Soxhlet method. Different concentrations of extract were prepared in equal volumes of dimethyl sulfoxide and ethanol solvent. Identification of beta-lactamase-producing isolates was done by phenotypic method with cefotaxime antibiotic disks and cefotaxime and clavulanic acid combined disks. Antibacterial activity against 100 isolates of beta-lactamase-producing bacteria was investigated by the well diffusion and tube dilution methods. Results: The results of the well diffusion and tube dilution methods showed that the ethanolic extract of Carum copticum L plant had antibacterial effects on 38 beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteria in both methods, which increases with increasing concentration of their antibacterial effect. Conclusion: The results showed that the ethanolic extract of Carum copticum L has an antibacterial effect on beta-lactamase-producing bacteria. Therefore, this extract can be a suitable option for future studies in vivo to prepare antibacterial drugs.
Preprint
Full-text available
Introduction and purpose: With the increasing antibiotic resistance of bacteria, it has provided the basis for replacing antimicrobial agents with plant origin and with fewer side effects. This study was conducted with the aim of investigating the antibacterial effects of the ethanolic extract of Achillea wilhelmsii on Escherichia coli producing broad-spectrum beta-lactamase. Materials and methods: The ethanolic extract of the plant was prepared by the Soxhlet method. Different concentrations of extract were prepared in equal volumes of dimethyl sulfoxide and ethanol solvent. Identification of beta-lactamase-producing isolates was done by phenotypic method with cefotaxime antibiotic disks and cefotaxime and clavulanic acid combined disks. Antibacterial activity against 100 isolates of beta-lactamase-producing bacteria was investigated by the well diffusion and tube dilution methods. Results: The results of the well diffusion and tube dilution methods showed that the ethanolic extract of Achillea wilhelmsii plant had antibacterial effects on 21 beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli bacteria in both methods, which increases with increasing concentration of their antibacterial effect. Conclusion: The results showed that the ethanolic extract of Achillea wilhelmsii has an antibacterial effect on beta-lactamase-producing bacteria. Therefore, this extract can be a suitable option for future studies in vivo to prepare antibacterial drugs.
Preprint
Full-text available
Introduction and purpose: Nowadays, with the increase of resistance of bacteria against a wide range of chemical antibiotics, it has caused the failure of the treatment process and the use of medicinal plants has been welcomed. The purpose of this study is to determine the antibacterial properties of the ethanolic extract of Rosemary on standard
Preprint
Full-text available
Introduction and purpose: Nowadays, with the increase of resistance of bacteria against a wide range of chemical antibiotics, it has caused the failure of the treatment process and the use of medicinal plants has been welcomed. The purpose of this study is to determine the antibacterial properties of the ethanolic extract of Stachys
Preprint
Full-text available
Background and Aim: Urinary tract infection (UTI) refers to the presence of pathogenic microbes in the urinary tract. Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) is the most common bacterium that causes urinary tract infection. The present study investigated the susceptibility and antibiotic resistance patterns of the strains.
Preprint
Full-text available
Introduction & Objective: Escherichia coli is a natural inhabitant of the intestines of humans and animals, but is also found in water, soil and even plants. Escherichia coli is one of the most common bacterial agents isolated from human infections. The drug resistance of this bacterium is very important, especially in hospitalized patients. This bacterium is one of the most common microbial causes in urinary tract infections and is the cause of many nosocomial infections such as sepsis, wound infections, gastroenteritis and neonatal meningitis. Escherichia coli is one of the opportunistic pathogens of the hospital and has become resistant to beta-lactam antibiotics due to the acquisition of plasmids encoding broad-spectrum beta-lactamases. Because of this, the treatment of Escherichia coli infections is difficult. Improper use of these antimicrobial drugs has led to increased drug resistance to different antibiotics in most bacteria. This has been one of the reasons for the growing use of plants as low-risk, available and inexpensive natural ingredients in the treatment of bacterial infections compared to synthetic antibiotics. Also, these herbal medicines are more popular among the people. These reasons have led to a new wave of global studies and the introduction of antibacterial effects of various plants in recent years. Ziziphora clinopodioides belongs to the genus Ziziphora and the genus Mint. In Iran, there are 49 genera of the mint genus with several hundred naturally distributed species. The geographical distribution of Ziziphora clinopodioides in the world is in the Eastern Balkans, southwest Asia and Central Asia to the Pamir and Himalayas (Iran, Iraq and central and eastern parts of Turkey) and Africa. This study intends to investigate the chemical composition and antibacterial effects of mountain cactus essential oil on antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli. Materials and Methods: After collecting plants and changing its scientific name by botanists, Ziziphora clinopodioides essential oil was extracted by steam distillation by Clevenger method and the antimicrobial effects of essential oil were studied by well diffusion method on the mentioned bacteria. The 100 samples used in this study were selected from the samples of Urmia Clinical Hospital and cultured on the dedicated culture media of mannitol salt agar and blood agar. Biochemical tests such as oxidase, fermentation of sugars, movement, indole, urease, nitrate reduction, MR, VP, H2S, Simon citrate, amino acid breakdown (lysine, arginine, phenlanolanine and ornithine) were performed and cultured in KIA medium. Isolates were then isolated on the Mollerinton agar culture medium by Kirby-Bauer method and their sensitivity to antibiotics was required. Antibiotics used in this study include ceftriaxone (30μg), imipenem (10μg), nalidixic acid (30μg), cotrimoxazole (25μg), amikacin (30μg), gentamicin (10μg), tetracycline (30μg), n, 10μg), cotrimoxazole (25μg), ampicillin (10μg), tobramycin (10μg), amoxicillin (10μ), ciprofloxacin (5μg) and cefotaxime (30μg) made by Padten Teb, after 37 hours C ° halo diameter The inhibitor was measured and the sensitivity and strength of the isolates were determined and the results were changed with the standard table. Results: The results showed that the essential oils were isolated from plants to investigate the antimicrobial effect. The antibacterial activity of several antibiotics against isolates obtained in vitro was observed. The results of this experiment showed that each bacterial isolate showed a similar behavior in the presence of antibiotics, but despite these differences between isolates in antibiotic resistance or sensitivity was observed. In addition to different types, antibiotics were also observed in the inhibitory mechanism, during which the antibiotics penicillin and erythromycin showed the least antibiotic effect. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that I can consider Ziziphora clinopodioides from the group of medicinal plants with its bacterial properties, which after operating their effects in vivo and identifying the active ingredients, it can be considered as real for common chemical drugs. Used in the treatment of infections.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the most common pathogen causing nosocomial infections. One of the reasons for the drug resistance in the Pseudomonas aeroginosa strains is the production of Extended-Spectrum Beta-lactamases enzymes. This study aimed to determine the antibiotic resistance and the frequency of the Extended-Spectrum Beta-lactamases enzymes (CTX-M1, CTX-M2, CTX-M3) in the Pseudomonas aeroginosa strains isolated in the hospitals of Tabriz Town. Methods: The Pseudomonas aeroginosa strains were collected from different samples of patients admitted to hospitals and medical centers in Tabriz Town during the period from 26 th December, 2014 to 25 th December 2015. After identifying the phenotypic and genotypic identity (16Sr RNA) and performing antibiogram test, the phenotype of ESBLs in the bacterium of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was evaluated by double-disk synergy method. Then the bacterial DNA was extracted, studied and evaluated by PCR method and using special primers for the frequency of genes. Results: 110 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains were identified from 1500 clinical specimens collected from the hospitals and medical centers in Tabriz Town that their highest resistance was related to the antibiotics of Amikacin (81.81%), Nalidixic acid (89.09%) and Ceftriaxone (75.45%) and the lowest one was related to the antibiotics of Tetracycline (44.54%) and Gentamicin (50.09%). The highest gene frequencies of ESBLs are related to the genes of CTX-M1 (27.27%), CTX-M2 (23.63%) and CTX-M3 (9.09%), respectively. Conclusion: The genes studied in this research were all on the chromosomes of the bacterium of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. So, investigating the genes of ESBL such as CTX-M1 which has the maximum frequency in the clinical specimens of Pseudomonas aeruginosa seems necessary.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Nowadays, overuse of the antibiotics culminates in existence of antibiotic resistant bacteria with high frequency. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the most important pathogenic bacteria because of its resistance to beta lactam antibiotics. This character in Pseudomonas aerugionsa occurs because of extended spectrum β lactamase (ESBL) genes, which carry by transposons, plasmids and mutation. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate frequency of existence of OXA, PER, CTX-M1, CTX-M2 and CTX-M genes in pathogenic Pseudomonas aerugionsa isolates from different hospitals in Shiraz, Iran. Methods: The pathogenic bacteria were isolated from hospitals in Shiraz during six months. Then, the isolates were identified and their antimicrobial sensitivity assessed by antibiogram test. In addition, ESBL genes in Pseudomonas aerugionsa were tested by disk double diffusion. Afterward, DNA of the isolates was extracted and the genes amplified by PCR method. Findings: Out of 728 bacteria isolated from the clinical samples obtained from the patients of the hospitals in Shiraz, 62 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates harbored ESBL genes. The high level resistance character of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates was related to erythromycin, ampicillin, tetracycline and imipenem. In additiont highest frequency of ESBL was related to OXA-10, PER-1, CTX-M1, CTX-M2 and CTX-M3. Conclusion: All of the antibiotic resistant genes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa located in choromosom. Hence, more investigations on ESBL genes such as OXA and the other genes in Pseudomonas areuginosa are necessary.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: To study the prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) among 663 clinical isolates obtained from various parts of India and to study the occurrence of different variants of ESBLs among these isolates. Methods: Phenotypic characterization and susceptibility studies were performed according to the methods described in Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. The occurrence of ESBL variants was analyzed with PCR using the previously reported primers. Results: Among the six hundred sixty three isolates, the identified isolates were Acinetobacter baumannii (72), Escherichia coli (218), Klebsiella pneumoniae (30), Klebsiella oxytoca (63), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (264) and Staphylococcus aureus (16). PCR results revealed that approximately 89.0% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were positive for ESBL followed by Escherichia coli (85.3%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (76.6%), Klebsiella oxytoca (73.0%), Acinetobacter baumannii (72.2%) and Staphylococcus aureus (31.2%). The overall prevalence of ESBL was 82.5%. The presence of TEM type ESBLs were the predominant (in 186 isolates), followed by SHV (138), OXA (92), CTX-M (65), AmpC (33), KPC (28) and blaZ (5). Of the drugs involved in the study, CSE1034 was found to be the most efficacious against all of ESBL positive clinical isolates showing susceptibility approximately 95.7% with minimal inhibitory concentration values between 0.125 and 8.000 μg/mL for all strains tested. The susceptibilities of penems (meropenem and imipenem and cilastatin) ranged between 83% and 93% for all the isolates. The susceptibilities of other drugs like piperacillin and tazobactam, amoxicillin and clavulanic acid, cefoperazone and sulbactam were <45% for all the isolates. Conclusions: Results of the present study indicated that majority of the isolates was susceptible to CSE1034 and it could be a potent antibacterial agent for the treatment of severe bacterial infections caused by such organisms.
Article
Full-text available
Background Nosocomial infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa presenting resistance to beta-lactam drugs are one of the most challenging targets for antimicrobial therapy, leading to substantial increase in mortality rates in hospitals worldwide. In this context, P. aeruginosa harboring acquired mechanisms of resistance, such as production of metallo-beta-lactamase (MBLs) and extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) have the highest clinical impact. Hence, this study was designed to investigate the presence of genes codifying for MBLs and ESBLs among carbapenem resistant P. aeruginosa isolated in a Brazilian 720-bed teaching tertiary care hospital. Methods Fifty-six carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa strains were evaluated for the presence of MBL and ESBL genes. Strains presenting MBL and/or ESBL genes were submitted to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for genetic similarity evaluation. Results Despite the carbapenem resistance, genes for MBLs (blaSPM-1 or blaIMP-1) were detected in only 26.7% of isolates. Genes encoding ESBLs were detected in 23.2% of isolates. The blaCTX-M-2 was the most prevalent ESBL gene (19.6%), followed by blaGES-1 and blaGES-5 detected in one isolate each. In all isolates presenting MBL phenotype by double-disc synergy test (DDST), the blaSPM-1 or blaIMP-1 genes were detected. In addition, blaIMP-1 was also detected in three isolates which did not display any MBL phenotype. These isolates also presented the blaCTX-M-2 gene. The co-existence of blaCTX-M-2 with blaIMP-1 is presently reported for the first time, as like as co-existence of blaGES-1 with blaIMP-1. Conclusions In this study MBLs production was not the major mechanism of resistance to carbapenems, suggesting the occurrence of multidrug efflux pumps, reduction in porin channels and production of other beta-lactamases. The detection of blaCTX-M-2,blaGES-1 and blaGES-5 reflects the recent emergence of ESBLs among antimicrobial resistant P. aeruginosa and the extraordinary ability presented by this pathogen to acquire multiple resistance mechanisms. These findings raise the concern about the future of antimicrobial therapy and the capability of clinical laboratories to detect resistant strains, since simultaneous production of MBLs and ESBLs is known to promote further complexity in phenotypic detection. Occurrence of intra-hospital clonal dissemination enhances the necessity of better observance of infection control practices.
Article
Background: Nosocomial infections are one of the most important medical problems in developed and under developing countries which cause the spread of infections diseases in society. Pseudomonas aeroginosa is one of the most important causes of hospital infections, especially in wounds from operated patients. Increase in antibiotic-resistance of pseudomonas aeroginosa cause a lot of problems for patients and in some cases lead to septicemia and death of patients. The aim of this study is to isolate and determine the drug resistance pattern of indigenous pseudomonas leading to cutaneous infections of patients in Alzahra hospital. Methods: In this study 770 samples were obtained from cutaneous wounds of patients hospitalized in Azahra hospital. Biochemical tests were used for identification of Pseudomonas aeroginosa. Antibacterial susceptibility test for antibiotics amikacin, cephtazidin, ciprofloxacin, tasocin, imipinim was performed using disk diffusion (Kirby- Buer) methods. Findings: Among 770 patients, 56 patients (7.3%) showed cutaneous infection caused by pseudomonas aeroginosa. Antibiotic resistance pattern showed that 82. 14% samples were resistant to ceftriaxone and for amikacin 57.14%, ceftazidime 53.57%, ciprofloxacin 42.85%, tazocin 39.28%, imipenem 14.28% respectively. Conclusion: These results indicate the necessity of culturing and antibiogram tests before treatment of bacterial cutaneous infections. Antibiotic resistance- patterns can be very helpful in choosing the appropriate drug. Also in the first phase, it cold be considered for treatment of the disease. Key words: Nosocomial infections, Skin infection, Pseudomonas aeroginosa, Drug resistance, Antibiotic.
Article
The analysis of 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence is a good tool for the detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in clinical specimens. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Wt strain was confirmed for the identification to the species level based on alignment of 16S rRNA gene sequence available in Genbank. DNA product at the predicted size 1kb was obtained. BLAST search indicated the homology between deduced sequence of Wt strain and P. aeruginosa D12A06 16S rRNA gene (accession number FJ655799.1). The antibiotic susceptibility of tested Wt strain against different antibiotics was carried using disk diffusion method. The inhibition zones were recorded only for 5 antibiotics. Resistance of Wt to tested antibiotics was arranged in the following order tetracycline (TE), nalidixic acid (NA) > norfloxacin (NOR) > chloramphilinical (C) > ciprofloxacin (CIP). Antibiotic susceptibility of the tested strain Wt to selected antibiotics and the diameter of inhibition zones were affected by different cultural conditions as incubation periods, incubation temperatures, pH values, carbon and nitrogen sources and types of agar media. Using agar dilution method MICs (minimum inhibitory concentrations) of TE and CIP were 100 and 80 μg/ml respectively for tested P. aeruginosa Wt. On the other hand plasmid profile analysis indicated that resistance of the tested Wt strain to CIP may be plasmid DNA carrier while it may be chromosomal DNA for TE.
Article
The compositions of bacterial genomes can be changed rapidly and dramatically through a variety of processes including horizontal gene transfer. This form of change is key to bacterial evolution, as it leads to 'evolution in quantum leaps'. Horizontal gene transfer entails the incorporation of genetic elements transferred from another organism-perhaps in an earlier generation-directly into the genome, where they form 'genomic islands', i.e. blocks of DNA with signatures of mobile genetic elements. Genomic islands whose functions increase bacterial fitness, either directly or indirectly, have most likely been positively selected and can be termed 'fitness islands'. Fitness islands can be divided into several subtypes: 'ecological islands' in environmental bacteria and 'saprophytic islands', 'symbiosis islands' or 'pathogenicity islands' (PAIs) in microorganisms that interact with living hosts. Here we discuss ways in which PAIs contribute to the pathogenic potency of bacteria, and the idea that genetic entities similar to genomic islands may also be present in the genomes of eukaryotes.