Introduction: Somatotype was developed by W.H. Sheldon (1940) based on the constitutional
psychology which attempted to associate human temperament with body type. The present study was aimed
to find out if any association presented between somatotype and depression.
Methods: 62 male and female
college students, age ranged from 18-21 yr, were studied. Somatotype was calculated using Heath-Carter
method (1990) and Beck Depression Inventory (1996) method was used for depression.
Results: Normal
depression level were observed in Mesomorphic endomorph category (35.7%), in Endomorphic ectomorph
category (25 %), in Ectomorphic endomorph category (50%), in Balance ectomorph category (85.7 %), in
Endomorphic mesomorph category (75 %) and in Balanced ectomorph category (50%). Mild depression was
observed in Mesomorphic endomorph category (28.6%), in Endomorphic ectomorph category (37.5%), in
Ectomorphic endomorph category (25%), in Balanced endomorph category (14.3%), in Endomorphic
mesomorph category (25%), and in Balanced ectomorph category (50%). Border line depression were
observed in Mesomorphic endomorph category (10.7%), in Endomorphic ectomorph category (25 %), in
Ectomorphic endomorph category (12.5 %). Moderate depression was observed in Mesomorphic endomorph
category (14.3 %), and in Endomorphic ectomorph category (12.5%). Severe and extreme depression levels
were observed only in Mesomorphic endomorph category (7.2 % and 3.6% respectively). Depression level of
75 % Mesomorphic endomorph category were non-clinical and rest were clinical. 87.5 % students with
Endomorphic ectomorph category were with non-clinical depression level, rest were with clinical depression
level. Depression level of 87.5 % Ectomorphic endomorph category were non-clinical, only 12.5 % were
clinical. The correlation coefficients (r) were 0.2 (between endomorphy and depression), 0.1 (between
mesomorphy and depression) and 0.1 (between ectomorphy and depression).
Conclusion: Thus, from the
above study, it could be concluded that somatotype categories did not have any significant association with
depression level. Further study is recommended. Somatotype is just a description of body shape and size,
rather than a reflection of mind.
Conflict of Interest : It doesn’t exist.
References
Beck, A.T., Steer, R.A., Ball, R., Ranieri, W. (1996). Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories -IA and -II in
psychiatric outpatients, Journal of Personality Assessment, 67 (3), 588–97. doi: 10.1207/s15327752.
Bulbena, A.R.M., Santos, M., Porta, J.C., Duró, J., Gago, J., Sangorrín, Gratacós, M. (1996). Somatotype in
Panic patients, Anxiety, 2, 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-7154
Carter, J.E.L., Heath, B.H. (1990). Somatotyping - Developments and Applications, Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge.
Čeřovská, J., Válek, J., Kaucká, J., Křikava, L., Honzák, R. (1980). Somatotype of Men Suffering from Ischaemic
Heart Disease. Anthropologie. 18(1), 3–13.
Marta, C., Marinho, D.A., Costa, M.A., M., Barbosa, T.M., Marques, M.C., (2011). Somatotype is More
Interactive with Strength than Fat Mass and Physical Activity, Journal of Human Kinetics Special Issue, 83-91.
19
Vertinsky, P. (2007). Physique as destiny: William H. Sheldon, Barbara Honeyman Heath, and the struggle for
hegemony in the science of somatotyping. Canadian Bulletin of Medical History, 24(2), 291-316.
doi:10.3138/cbmh.24.2.291. PMID 18447308
Zu, P., Zhao, Y.Q., Xu, S.J. (2011). Association between self-assessed somatotypes and symptom depression
among children and adolescents, Zhonghua liu Xing Bing xue za zhi = Zhonghua Liuxingbingxue Zazhi.
32(12), 1208-1211.