ArticlePDF Available

Figures

Content may be subject to copyright.
1
WHO DOES THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT HELP AND WHO
DOES IT FAIL?
Zhen Cui*
Devika Hazra
California State University, Los Angeles
December 2017
Abstract
This study uses the 2007 and 2013 Annual Social and Economic Supplement of the Current
Population Survey to examine the effect of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on health insurance
coverage among adults in the U.S. It finds that the ACA has improved coverage for men, youth,
minorities, and low-income and less-educated individuals. However, those who are self-employed
or do not work full-time have been negatively impacted.
* California State University - Los Angeles, Email: zcui@calstatela.edu
California State University - Los Angeles, Email: dhazra@calstatela.edu
2
I. Introduction
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) has been a contention for policymakers since its inception.
While evidence on actual health outcomes is still sparse, a few studies have shown a decrease in
the number of the uninsured. A study done by Sommers, Buchmueller, Decker, Carey, and Kronick
(2013) found sizable coverage gains for adults aged 19–25. The gains continued to grow
throughout 2011, with the largest gains seen in unmarried adults, non-students, and men.
According to Sommers, Gunja, and Finegold (2015), low-income adults within the states that
expanded Medicaid reported significant gains in insurance coverage and access compared with
adults within the states that did not expand Medicaid. Moreover, Sommers, Maylone, Blendon,
Orav, and Epstein (2017) assessed changes in health care use and self-reported health after three
years of the ACA’s coverage expansion, using survey data collected from low-income adults
through the end of 2016 in two states (Arkansas and Kentucky) that expanded coverage, and Texas
that did not expand coverage. By the end of 2016, the uninsurance rate in the two expansion states
had dropped by more than 20 percentage points relative to the non-expansion state. Finally, Figure
1 shows the percentage of adults aged 18–64 who were uninsured or had private or public coverage
at the time of interview in the U.S. between 1997–2016.
Figure 1 Percentages of adults aged 18–64 who were
uninsured or had private or public coverage at the time of interview:
United States, 1997–2016
After the main ACA provisions went into effect in 2014, racial disparities in coverage
declined slightly as the percentage of adults who were uninsured decreased by 7.1 percentage
3
points for Hispanics, 5.1 percentage points for Blacks, and 3 percentage points for Whites
(Buchmueller et. al. 2016). McMorrow, Long, Kenny, and Anderson (2015) found significant
improvements in insurance coverage for all racial and ethnic groups between the second and third
quarters of 2013 as well as 2014, which translated into reductions in absolute disparities in the
uninsurance rates for Blacks and Hispanics in both expansion and non-expansion states.
Furthermore, Chen, Vargas-Bustamante, Mortensen, and Ortega (2016) demonstrated that racial
and ethnic disparities in access had been reduced significantly during the initial years of the ACA
implementation.
Despite coverage improvement for men, single adults, and minorities, the ACA has a
negative effect on other subpopulations. For example, Blumberg, Corlette, and Lucia (2014)
roughly estimated that the number of uninsured self-employed individuals and entrepreneurs
would relatively increase by more than 11 percent following the ACA.
Against the above background, the present study applies a probit regression separately to
the 2007 and 2013 Annual Social and Economic Supplement of the Current Population Survey
(ASEC CPS). It then compares the effects of main demographic traits and socioeconomic factors
on health insurance coverage in the U.S. for adults across all ages before and after the signing of
the ACA. We find that the coverage has improved for men, youth, minorities, and low-income and
less-educated individuals, while adversely impacting those who are self-employed or do not work
full-time. These findings are largely consistent with the existing studies. Thus, this study makes
two major contributions to the literature. First, it adds more empirical evidence regarding the
impact of the ACA on health insurance coverage for the adult population in the U.S. Second, it
provides practical policy and business insights by identifying specific groups which policymakers
and practicing managers should focus on extending the insurance coverage to in the post-ACA era.
The rest of the paper proceeds as follows. Section 2 describes the data and the econometric
model. Section 3 explains the regression results. Section 4 presents the concluding remarks and
makes policy and business recommendations.
II. Empirical Strategy
The ASEC CPS is a rich dataset that has detailed information on employment,
demographics, and health insurance. The data used in this study are extracted from its 2007 and
2013 series, marking the three years before and after the signing of the ACA. After removing
missing values and restricting respondents to civilians aged 18–79, the number of individual
observations in our final sample is 247,943 (125,851 for 2007 and 122,092 for 2013).
The dataset has a constructed variable that indicates whether a respondent had any health
insurance coverage (private or public) in the previous year. This study considers a respondent
covered by health insurance if the answer is yes, and not covered by health insurance if the answer
is no. Per this definition, about 82% of our sample had health insurance (83% for 2007 and 82%
for 2013). Clearly, not everyone was covered even three years after the ACA was signed into law.
This highlights the relevance and importance of studying the determinants of health insurance
coverage in the post-ACA era. All statistics reported in this study are appropriately weighted.
Existing studies on the determinants of health insurance coverage typically employ a binary
response model (i.e., logit or probit regression). For example, Gius (2010) used the 2008 National
Health Interview Survey and adopted a logit regression to examine the determinants of health
insurance coverage for young adults. Cantiello, Fottler, Oetjen, and Zhang (2015) used the 2005
and 2008 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to investigate the factors that influence young adults’
4
decision to have private health insurance. They incorporated structural equation modeling into a
standard logit regression.
Following those studies, we apply the probit regression below to the 2007 and 2013 data
separately. A comparison of results from these two years would enable us to examine the effect of
the ACA on adult health insurance coverage in the U.S.
coveredi = α + β1 agei + β2 malei + β3 log_incomei + β4 fulltimei + β5 self_empi
+ β6 highschooli + β7 collegei + β8 graduatei + β9 whitei + ui,
where coveredi is a dummy variable that takes 1 if individual i has health insurance coverage and
0 otherwise, agei denotes the individual’s age, malei is a dummy variable that takes 1 if the
individual is male and 0 otherwise, log_incomei denotes the individual’s logged annual pre-tax
wage and salary income,
1
fulltimei is a dummy variable that takes 1 if the individual has a full-time
job and 0 otherwise, self_empi is a dummy variable that takes 1 if the individual is self-employed
and 0 otherwise, highschooli is a dummy variable that takes 1 if the individual has completed 12
years of schooling or received a high school diploma and 0 otherwise, collegei is a dummy variable
that takes 1 if the individual has some college education or received an Associate’s or a Bachelor’s
degree and 0 otherwise, graduatei is a dummy variable that takes 1 if the individual has a Master’s
degree or above and 0 otherwise, whitei is a dummy variable that takes 1 if the individual is White
and 0 otherwise, and ui denotes the standard classical error term. Therefore, our analysis takes into
account both basic demographic traits (i.e., age, gender, and race) and various socioeconomic
factors (i.e., income, employment, and educational attainment). Table 1 describes the summary
statistics of all the variables.
Table 1 Summary statistics
2007
2013
VARIABLES
MEAN
STANDARD
DEVIATION
MIN
MEAN
STANDARD
DEVIATION
covered
0.83
0.38
0
0.82
0.39
age
44.14
16.03
18
45.05
16.40
male
0.49
0.50
0
0.49
0.50
log_income
5.99
5.80
-2.30
5.55
5.91
fulltime
0.57
0.50
0
0.51
0.50
self_emp
0.08
0.26
0
0.07
0.25
highschool
0.33
0.47
0
0.31
0.46
college
0.46
0.50
0
0.49
0.50
graduate
0.09
0.29
0
0.10
0.31
white
0.81
0.39
0
0.79
0.41
III. Results
Table 2 shows the average marginal effects estimated using the probit regression model for
the 2007 and 2013 data, respectively. The estimates suggest that all marginal effects are highly
1
The income amounts have been adjusted for inflation using the Consumer Price Index (1999 =
100). Also, striving for the maximum number of observations, we use log (inflation-adjusted income + 0.1)
to account for income value of zero.
5
statistically significant. The age and gender gap in health insurance coverage has shrunk. A one
year decrease in age reduced the average probability of having health insurance by 0.54 percentage
point in 2007, but by 0.50 percentage point in 2013. The probability of adult males having health
insurance was 3.32 percentage points lower than that of adult females in 2007; this number dropped
to 2.99 in 2013.
Table 2 Average marginal effects of probit model, 2007 vs. 2013
VARIABLES
2007
2013
age
0.0054***
0.0050***
(7.30e-05)
(7.28e-05)
male
-0.0332***
-0.0299***
(0.0025)
(0.0025)
log_income
0.0031***
0.0007**
(0.0003)
(0.0003)
fulltime
0.0040
0.0330***
(0.0034)
(0.0034)
self_emp
-0.0859***
-0.1130***
(0.0044)
(0.0047)
highschool
0.0884***
0.0801***
(0.0033)
(0.0037)
college
0.1850***
0.1780***
(0.0033)
(0.0036)
graduate
0.2890***
0.2740***
(0.0069)
(0.0064)
white
0.0391***
0.0368***
(0.0029)
(0.0029)
number of observations
125,851
122,092
Standard errors in parentheses. *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1.
The race and income gap in health insurance coverage has also shrunk. For example,
Whites were 3.91 percentage points more likely to have health insurance than non-Whites in 2007,
but were 3.68 percentage points more likely in 2013. A 10% decrease in income reduced the
average probability of having health insurance by 0.031 percentage point in 2007, but by 0.007
percentage point in 2013.
In addition, the education gap in health insurance coverage has shrunk. High school
graduates were 8.84 percentage points more likely to have health insurance than those with below
high school education in 2007; this number fell to 8.01 in 2013. For college-educated individuals,
the probability of having health insurance was 18.5 percentage points higher than those who did
not go to college in 2007, but were 17.8 percentage points higher in 2013. Individuals with
graduate degrees or higher were 28.9 percentage points more likely to have health insurance than
those who did not have graduate degrees in 2007; this number fell by 1.5 in 2013.
Unfortunately, health insurance coverage has deteriorated for individuals who are self-
employed or do not have full-time jobs. The self-employed were 8.59 percentage points less likely
to have health insurance than their non-self-employed counterparts in 2007, but were 11.3
percentage points less likely in 2013. For people without full-time jobs, they were 0.4 percentage
point less likely to have health insurance than full-time job holders in 2007, but were 3.3
percentage points less likely in 2013. These two marginal effect changes are the biggest among all
the factors examined.
6
Lastly, despite the changes observed between 2007 and 2013, the magnitudes of most
changes are fairly small. Also, men, minorities, and young people are still less likely to have health
insurance, so are low-income and less-educated individuals as well as those who are self-employed
or do not have full-time jobs.
IV. Conclusion
This study examines the determinants of adult health insurance coverage in the U.S.
between 2007 (pre-ACA) and 2013 (post-ACA). We find that after the signing of the ACA, health
insurance coverage has improved among males, youth, minorities, and low-income and less-
educated individuals, but deteriorated for people who are self-employed or do not work full-time.
While the first set of findings are encouraging, the observed changes are still rather small.
Moreover, the ACA did not expand health insurance coverage as fast and drastically as expected.
Perhaps more public outreach and education are needed to magnify the positive impact. Also,
future research should re-examine this topic when more recent data become available.
The second set of findings are troubling. In light of these findings, we make the following
recommendations to policymakers and practicing managers. For policymakers, we suggest that
future policies offer companies more incentives to provide their part-time employees with health
insurance. Also, policymakers should pay more attention to people who are self-employed by
encouraging them to obtain coverage and making health insurance more affordable to them. This
group of people will grow rapidly in size in the near future as technology advancement makes
freelancing and entrepreneurship more accessible to the general public.
For practicing managers, as internet-based technology progresses further, freelancing will
become the future of work either by workers’ choice or due to business contingency. Currently,
freelancers are considered as self-employed and are responsible for their medical and dental
insurance entirely on their own. While this group of people are largely neglected by policymakers,
one wonders if there is a solution in the private sector. For example, businesses could offer to
partially contribute to a freelancer’s health insurance if the freelancer agrees to pay into the
company’s account reserved for covering the benefits of their regular employees. Given our
findings, this approach not only demonstrates a company’s commitment to social responsibility
but potentially makes itself more attractive to certain freelancers.
Author Contact Information
Cui, Zhen: zcui@calstatela.edu; Hazra, Devika: dhazra@calstatela.edu.
References
Blumberg, L.J., Corlette, S., and Lucia, K. 2014. The Affordable Care Act: Improving incentives
for entrepreneurship and self-employment. Public Policy & Aging Report, 24(4), 162-7.
Buchmueller, T. C., Levinson, Z. M., Levy, H. G., and Wolfe, B. L. 2016. Effect of the Affordable
Care Act on racial and ethnic disparities in health insurance coverage. American Journal
of Public Health, 106, 1416-21.
Cantiello, J., Fottler, M. D., Oetjen, D., and Zhang, N. J. 2015. The impact of demographic and
perceptual variables on a young adult’s decision to be covered by private health insurance.
BMC Health Services Research, 15, 1-15.
7
Chen, J., Vargas-Bustamante, A., Mortensen, K., and Ortega, A. N. 2016. Racial and ethnic
disparities in health care access and utilization under the Affordable Care Act. Medical
Care, 54(2), 140-6.
Gius, P. M. 2010. An analysis of the health insurance coverage of young adults. International
Journal of Applied Economics, 7(1), 1-17.
McMorrow, S., Long, S. K., Kenney, G.M., and Anderson, N. 2015. Uninsurance disparities have
narrowed for Black and Hispanic adults under the Affordable Care Act. Health Affairs,
34(10), 1774-8.
Sommers, B. D., Buchmueller, T., Decker, S. L., Carey, C., and Kronick, K. 2013. The Affordable
Care Act has led to significant gains in health insurance and access to care for young
adults. Health Affairs, 32(1), 165-74.
Sommers, B. D., Gunja, M. Z., Finegold, K., and Musco, T. 2015. Changes in self-reported
insurance coverage, access to care, and health under the Affordable Care Act. Journal of
the American Medical Association, 314(4), 366-74.
Sommers, B. D., Maylone, B., Blendon, R. J., Orav, E. J., and Epstein, A. M. 2017. Three-year
impacts of the Affordable Care Act: Improved medical care and health among low-income
adults. Health Affairs, 36, 1119-28.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: To examine racial and ethnic disparities in health care access and utilization after the Affordable Care Act (ACA) health insurance mandate was fully implemented in 2014. Research design: Using the 2011-2014 National Health Interview Survey, we examine changes in health care access and utilization for the nonelderly US adult population. Multivariate linear probability models are estimated to adjust for demographic and sociodemographic factors. Results: The implementation of the ACA (year indicator 2014) is associated with significant reductions in the probabilities of being uninsured (coef=-0.03, P<0.001), delaying any necessary care (coef=-0.03, P<0.001), forgoing any necessary care (coef=-0.02, P<0.001), and a significant increase in the probability of having any physician visits (coef=0.02, P<0.001), compared with the reference year 2011. Interaction terms between the 2014 year indicator and race/ethnicity demonstrate that uninsured rates decreased more substantially among non-Latino African Americans (African Americans) (coef=-0.04, P<0.001) and Latinos (coef=-0.03, P<0.001) compared with non-Latino whites (whites). Latinos were less likely than whites to delay (coef=-0.02, P<0.001) or forgo (coef=-0.02, P<0.001) any necessary care and were more likely to have physician visits (coef=0.03, P<0.005) in 2014. The association between year indicator of 2014 and the probability of having any emergency department visits is not significant. Conclusions: Health care access and insurance coverage are major factors that contributed to racial and ethnic disparities before the ACA implementation. Our results demonstrate that racial and ethnic disparities in access have been reduced significantly during the initial years of the ACA implementation that expanded access and mandated that individuals obtain health insurance.
Article
Full-text available
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) completed its second open enrollment period in February 2015. Assessing the law's effects has major policy implications. To estimate national changes in self-reported coverage, access to care, and health during the ACA's first 2 open enrollment periods and to assess differences between low-income adults in states that expanded Medicaid and in states that did not expand Medicaid. Analysis of the 2012-2015 Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index, a daily national telephone survey. Using multivariable regression to adjust for pre-ACA trends and sociodemographics, we examined changes in outcomes for the nonelderly US adult population aged 18 through 64 years (n = 507 055) since the first open enrollment period began in October 2013. Linear regressions were used to model each outcome as a function of a linear monthly time trend and quarterly indicators. Then, pre-ACA (January 2012-September 2013) and post-ACA (January 2014-March 2015) changes for adults with incomes below 138% of the poverty level in Medicaid expansion states (n = 48 905 among 28 states and Washington, DC) vs nonexpansion states (n = 37 283 among 22 states) were compared using a differences-in-differences approach. Beginning of the ACA's first open enrollment period (October 2013). Self-reported rates of being uninsured, lacking a personal physician, lacking easy access to medicine, inability to afford needed care, overall health status, and health-related activity limitations. Among the 507 055 adults in this survey, pre-ACA trends were significantly worsening for all outcomes. Compared with the pre-ACA trends, by the first quarter of 2015, the adjusted proportions who were uninsured decreased by 7.9 percentage points (95% CI, -9.1 to -6.7); who lacked a personal physician, -3.5 percentage points (95% CI, -4.8 to -2.2); who lacked easy access to medicine, -2.4 percentage points (95% CI, -3.3 to -1.5); who were unable to afford care, -5.5 percentage points (95% CI, -6.7 to -4.2); who reported fair/poor health, -3.4 percentage points (95% CI, -4.6 to -2.2); and the percentage of days with activities limited by health, -1.7 percentage points (95% CI, -2.4 to -0.9). Coverage changes were largest among minorities; for example, the decrease in the uninsured rate was larger among Latino adults (-11.9 percentage points [95% CI, -15.3 to -8.5]) than white adults (-6.1 percentage points [95% CI, -7.3 to -4.8]). Medicaid expansion was associated with significant reductions among low-income adults in the uninsured rate (differences-in-differences estimate, -5.2 percentage points [95% CI, -7.9 to -2.6]), lacking a personal physician (-1.8 percentage points [95% CI, -3.4 to -0.3]), and difficulty accessing medicine (-2.2 percentage points [95% CI, -3.8 to -0.7]). The ACA's first 2 open enrollment periods were associated with significantly improved trends in self-reported coverage, access to primary care and medications, affordability, and health. Low-income adults in states that expanded Medicaid reported significant gains in insurance coverage and access compared with adults in states that did not expand Medicaid.
Article
Full-text available
Background: The large number of uninsured individuals in the United States creates negative consequences for those who are uninsured and for those who are covered by health insurance plans. Young adults between the ages of 18 and 24 are the largest uninsured population subgroup. This subgroup warrants analysis. The major aim of this study is to determine why young adults between the ages of 18 and 24 are the largest uninsured population subgroup. Methods: The present study seeks to determine why young adults between the ages of 18 and 24 are the largest population subgroup that is not covered by private health insurance. Data on perceived health status, perceived need, perceived value, socioeconomic status, gender, and race was obtained from a national sample of 1,340 young adults from the 2005 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and examined for possible explanatory variables, as well as data on the same variables from a national sample of 1,463 from the 2008 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Results: Results of the structural equation model analysis indicate that insurance coverage in the 2005 sample was largely a function of higher socioeconomic status and being a non-minority. Perceived health status, perceived need, perceived value, and gender were not significant predictors of private health insurance coverage in the 2005 sample. However, in the 2008 sample, these indicators changed. Socioeconomic status, minority status, perceived health, perceived need, and perceived value were significant predictors of private health insurance coverage. Conclusions: The results of this study show that coverage by a private health insurance plan in the 2005 sample was largely a matter of having a higher socioeconomic status and having a non-minority status. In 2008 each of the attitudinal variables (perceived health, perceived value, and perceived need) predicted whether subjects carried private insurance. Our findings suggest that among those sampled, the young adult subgroup between the ages of 18 and 24 does not necessarily represent a unique segment of the population, with behaviors differing from the rest of the sample.
Article
Major policy uncertainty continues to surround the Affordable Care Act (ACA) at both the state and federal levels. We assessed changes in health care use and self-reported health after three years of the ACA's coverage expansion, using survey data collected from low-income adults through the end of 2016 in three states: Kentucky, which expanded Medicaid; Arkansas, which expanded private insurance to low-income adults using the federal Marketplace; and Texas, which did not expand coverage. We used a difference-in-differences model with a control group and an instrumental variables model to provide individual-level estimates of the effects of gaining insurance. By the end of 2016 the uninsurance rate in the two expansion states had dropped by more than 20 percentage points relative to the nonexpansion state. For uninsured people gaining coverage, this change was associated with a 41-percentage-point increase in having a usual source of care, a $337 reduction in annual out-of-pocket spending, significant increases in preventive health visits and glucose testing, and a 23-percentage-point increase in "excellent" self-reported health. Among adults with chronic conditions, we found improvements in affordability of care, regular care for those conditions, medication adherence, and self-reported health.
Article
Objectives: To document how health insurance coverage changed for White, Black, and Hispanic adults after the Affordable Care Act (ACA) went into effect. Methods: We used data from the American Community Survey from 2008 to 2014 to examine changes in the percentage of nonelderly adults who were uninsured, covered by Medicaid, or covered by private health insurance. In addition to presenting overall trends by race/ethnicity, we stratified the analysis by income group and state Medicaid expansion status. Results: In 2013, 40.5% of Hispanics and 25.8% of Blacks were uninsured, compared with 14.8% of Whites. We found a larger gap in private insurance, which was partially offset by higher rates of public coverage among Blacks and Hispanics. After the main ACA provisions went into effect in 2014, coverage disparities declined slightly as the percentage of adults who were uninsured decreased by 7.1 percentage points for Hispanics, 5.1 percentage points for Blacks, and 3 percentage points for Whites. Coverage gains were greater in states that expanded Medicaid programs. Conclusions: The ACA has reduced racial/ethnic disparities in coverage, although substantial disparities remain. Further increases in coverage will require Medicaid expansion by more states and improved program take-up in states that have already done so. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print May 19, 2016: e1-e6. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2016.303155).
Article
Black and Hispanic adults have long experienced higher uninsurance rates than white adults. Under the Affordable Care Act, differences in uninsurance rates have narrowed for both black and Hispanic adults compared to their white counterparts, but Hispanics continue to face large gaps in coverage.
Article
The Affordable Care Act enables young adults to remain as dependents on their parents' health insurance until age twenty-six, and recent evidence suggests that as many as three million young adults have gained coverage as a result. However, there has been no evidence yet on the policy's effect on access to care, and questions remain about the coverage impact on important subgroups. Using data from two nationally representative surveys, comparing young adults who gained access to dependent coverage to a control group (adults ages 26-34) who were not affected by the new policy, we found sizable coverage gains for adults ages 19-25. The gains continued to grow throughout 2011 (up 6.7 percentage points from September 2010 to September 2011), with the largest gains seen in unmarried adults, nonstudents, and men. Analysis of the timing of the policy impact suggested that early gains in coverage were greatest for people in worse health. We found strong evidence of increased access to care because of the law, with significant reductions in the number of young adults who delayed getting care and in those who did not receive needed care because of cost.
An analysis of the health insurance coverage of young adults
  • P M Gius
Gius, P. M. 2010. An analysis of the health insurance coverage of young adults. International Journal of Applied Economics, 7(1), 1-17.