ArticlePDF Available

Consumption of ultra-processed foods and associated sociodemographic factors in the USA between 2007 and 2012: Evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Objectives To compare ultra-processed food consumption across sociodemographic groups and over time (2007–2008, 2009–2010, 2011–2012) in the USA. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007–2012. Participants All individuals aged ≥2 years with at least one 24-hour dietary recall were included (n=23 847). Main outcome measures Average dietary contribution of ultra-processed foods (expressed as a percentage of the total caloric value of the diet), obtained after classifying all food items according to extent and purpose of industrial food processing using NOVA classification. Data analysis Linear regression was used to evaluate the association between sociodemographic characteristics or NHANES cycles and dietary contribution of ultra-processed foods. Results Almost 60% of calories consumed in the period 2007–2012 came from ultra-processed foods. Consumption of ultra-processed foods decreased with age and income level, was higher for non-Hispanic whites or non-Hispanic blacks than for other race/ethnicity groups and lower for people with college than for lower levels of education, all differences being statistically significant. Overall contribution of ultra-processed foods increased significantly between NHANES cycles (nearly 1% point per cycle), the same being observed among males, adolescents and high school education-level individuals. Conclusions Ultra-processed food consumption in the USA in the period 2007–2012 was overall high, greater among non-Hispanic whites or non-Hispanic blacks, less educated, younger, lower-income strata and increased across time.
Content may be subject to copyright.
1
BaraldiLG, etal. BMJ Open 2018;8:e020574. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020574
Open Access
Consumption of ultra-processed foods
and associated sociodemographic factors
in the USA between 2007 and 2012:
evidence from a nationally
representative cross-sectional study
Larissa Galastri Baraldi,1,2 Euridice Martinez Steele,1,2 Daniela Silva Canella,2,3
Carlos Augusto Monteiro1,2
To cite: BaraldiLG, Martinez
SteeleE, CanellaDS, etal.
Consumption of ultra-
processed foods and associated
sociodemographic factors
in the USA between 2007
and 2012: evidence from a
nationally representative cross-
sectional study. BMJ Open
2018;8:e020574. doi:10.1136/
bmjopen-2017-020574
Prepublication history for
this paper is available online.
To view these les, please visit
the journal online (http:// dx. doi.
org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-
020574).
Received 14 November 2017
Revised 5 January 2018
Accepted 31 January 2018
1Department of Nutrition, School
of Public Health, University of
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
2Center for Epidemiological
Studies in Health and Nutrition,
University of São Paulo, São
Paulo, Brazil
3Department of Applied
Nutrition, Institute of Nutrition,
Rio de Janeiro State University,
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Correspondence to
DrCarlos AugustoMonteiro;
carlosam@ usp. br
Research
ABSTRACT
Objectives To compare ultra-processed food consumption
across sociodemographic groups and over time (2007–
2008, 2009–2010, 2011–2012) in the USA.
Design Cross-sectional study.
Setting National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
(NHANES) 2007–2012.
Participants All individuals aged ≥2 years with at least
one 24-hour dietary recall were included (n=23 847).
Main outcome measures Average dietary contribution of
ultra-processed foods (expressed as a percentage of the
total caloric value of the diet), obtained after classifying all
food items according to extent and purpose of industrial
food processing using NOVA classication.
Data analysis Linear regression was used to evaluate the
association between sociodemographic characteristics or
NHANES cycles and dietary contribution of ultra-processed
foods.
Results Almost 60% of calories consumed in the
period 2007–2012 came from ultra-processed foods.
Consumption of ultra-processed foods decreased with age
and income level, was higher for non-Hispanic whites or
non-Hispanic blacks than for other race/ethnicity groups
and lower for people with college than for lower levels of
education, all differences being statistically signicant.
Overall contribution of ultra-processed foods increased
signicantly between NHANES cycles (nearly 1% point
per cycle), the same being observed among males,
adolescents and high school education-level individuals.
Conclusions Ultra-processed food consumption in the
USA in the period 2007–2012 was overall high, greater
among non-Hispanic whites or non-Hispanic blacks, less
educated, younger, lower-income strata and increased
across time.
INTRODUCTION
Ultra-processed food and drink products
are packaged formulations resulting from
several sequences of industrial processes
(hence ‘ultra-processed’). They are manu-
factured mostly or entirely from substances
derived from foods and several additives
used to imitate sensory properties of foods
or to disguise unpalatable aspects of the final
product. They typically contain little or no
intact foods, and are ready to drink, eat or
heat up.1 2
Worldwide, the relationship between
consumption of specific ultra-processed
foods such as soft drinks and diet-related
chronic non-communicable diseases is
Strengths and limitations of this study
Use of a large, nationally representative sample of
the US population, increasing generalisability.
Unlike most articles which have focused on specic
food items such as soft drinks or fast food, our study
evaluates the impact of a comprehensive group of
products whose consumption is increasing rapidly
in most countries.
Dietary data recallbias may lead to underestimation
of ultra-processed food consumption, especially
if some individuals tend to under-report these
types of food items. Should this under-reporting
have increased with time in response to a growing
awareness of health effects of ultra-processed
foods, this could result in a greater underestimation
of ultra-processed foods in later years.
Information indicative of food processing is not
consistently determined for all food items in National
Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which could
lead to modest overestimation or underestimation of
the consumption of ultra-processed foods.
Social desirability bias may lead to underestimation
of ultra-processed food consumption. Should
this under-reporting have increased with time in
response to a growing awareness of the health
effects of ultra-processed foods, this could result
in a greater underestimation of ultra-processed
food consumption in later years. Differential social
desirability bias across socioeconomic groups
(should this exist) could lead to both underestimation
or overestimation of the studied associations.
group.bmj.com on March 10, 2018 - Published by http://bmjopen.bmj.com/Downloaded from
2BaraldiLG, etal. BMJ Open 2018;8:e020574. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020574
Open Access
well documented.3 4 Cross-sectional studies have also
shown an association between ultra-processed food
intake and outcomes such as obesity and metabolic
syndrome.5–7 Increased risks of obesity, hypertension and
dyslipidaemia among higher consumers of ultra-processed
foods have also been reported by cohort studies.8 9 There-
upon, the rise in obesity and chronic diseases observed in
the USA in the last decades10 11 may have been triggered
by the increase in ultra-processed food and drink product
availability12 13 and its negative impact on dietary quality.
Indeed, studies have shown that in the USA, ultra-pro-
cessed foods are the major dietary contributors of added
sugars with the mean added sugars content almost tripling
between the first and last quintiles of ultra-processed food
consumption1 14 An increase in dietary contribution of
ultra-processed foods has also been associated with both
a decrease in protein, fibre, vitamins A, C, D and E, zinc,
potassium, phosphorus, magnesium and calcium densi-
ties, and with an increase of carbohydrate, added sugar
and saturated fat contents.14
Although the USA has been recognised to be one of
the first countries to suffer a meaningful rise in ultra-pro-
cessed food and drink product market availability,12 13
there is a lack of evidence regarding recent consumption
changes and also differences among sociodemographic
strata. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare ultra-pro-
cessed food consumption across different sociodemo-
graphic groups of the US population and to describe the
recent evolution of ultra-processed food consumption in
this population.
METHODS
Study population and data collection
This study included data from three cycles of National
Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES):
2007–2008, 2009–2010 and 2011–2012. NHANES is a
continuous, nationally representative, cross-sectional
survey of non-institutionalised, civilian US residents.15
NHANES sample was obtained using a complex, multi-
stage, probability sampling design.
In the first step of the survey, all participants receive
an interviewer at home and complete questionnaires
about health history, housing characteristics and family
demographic background. Within 1 or 2 weeks, phys-
ical examinations and laboratory studies are performed
at a mobile examination centre (MEC). During these
examinations, participants complete a dietary interview
component that includes one 24-hour dietary recall.
A follow-up dietary recall is carried out 3–10 days after
the MEC examination with all examinees by telephone.
Both dietary recalls are administered by trained inter-
viewers using US Department of Agriculture Automated
Multiple-Pass Method. Portion sizes were estimated by
NHANES as further explained in NHANES Manual.16
Shortly, each MEC dietary interview room contains a
standard set of measuring guides that are used to help
the respondent report the volume and dimensions of the
food items consumed. On completion of the in-person
interview, participants are given measuring cups, spoons,
a ruler and a food model booklet to use for reporting
food amounts during the telephone interview.
For children under 9 years of age, the interview was
conducted with a proxy; for children between 6 and 8
years of age, in the presence of the child. Children aged
9–11 years provided their own data assisted by an adult
household member (assistant). The preferred proxy/
assistant was the most knowledgeable person about the
child’s consumption on the day before the interview. If
the child had more than one caregiver, several individuals
could contribute to the intake data.
Of the 10 149 people screened in NHANES 2007–2008,
9255 (91.2%) participated in the dietary interview in the
MEC and 7838 (77.2%) answered the follow-up dietary
recall. Similarly, in the second NHANES cycle (2009–
2010) of 10 537 people screened, 9754 (92.6%) and 8406
(79.8%) completed the first and the follow-up dietary
recall, respectively. In 2011–2012, of the 9756 individuals
screened, 8519 (87.3%) responded to the first dietary
recall and 7605 (78.0%) completed the second dietary
recall.
In our study, all individuals aged 2 years— who
completed at least one dietary recall—were considered
eligible. Pregnant women and breastfeeding mothers
were excluded, resulting in a final study sample of 23 847
individuals. For adjusted analyses, we evaluated those
individuals who had complete information on sociode-
mographic variables. Since 4307 participants had missing
values on family income and/or educational attainment,
multivariable-adjusted analysis included 19 540 individ-
uals. These individuals with missing values had similar
sociodemographic characteristics (gender, age, race/
ethnicity) and similar mean consumption of ultra-pro-
cessed foods to the full sample of interviewed participants
aged 2 years.
Sociodemographic variables
The sociodemographic variables considered in this study
were: gender (male and female); age group (2–9 years,
10–19 years, 20–39 years, 40–59 years, 60+ years); race/
ethnicity (American non-Hispanic white, American
non-Hispanic black, Mexican-American, other Hispanic
and other race, including Asians and multiracial).
Educational attainment of respondents for participants
aged more than 24 years and of household reference
person otherwise (less than high school, high school
and college). There were 113 households (1.51% of the
sample) where the reference person was younger than
25 years old. In these households, the education achieve-
ment of the interviewee (in all cases aged between 18 and
24 years) was adopted.
Ratio of family income to poverty categorised based on
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program eligibility
(low, 0.00–1.30; medium, >1.30–3.50 and high, >3.50 and
above).15 Income-to-poverty ratio is defined as ‘the
ratio of family or unrelated individual income to their
group.bmj.com on March 10, 2018 - Published by http://bmjopen.bmj.com/Downloaded from
3
BaraldiLG, etal. BMJ Open 2018;8:e020574. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020574
Open Access
appropriate poverty threshold. Ratios below 1.00 indi-
cate that the income for the respective family or unre-
lated individual is below the official definition of poverty,
while a ratio of 1.00 or greater indicates income above the
poverty level’.17
Food classication according to processing
All recorded food items from the three NHANES cycles
were classified according to NOVA (a name, not an
acronym), a food classification based on the extent and
purpose of industrial food processing.2 NOVA includes
four groups: ‘unprocessed or minimally processed foods’
(such as fresh, dry or frozen fruits or vegetables; pack-
aged grains and pulses; grits, flakes or flours made from
corn, wheat or cassava; pasta, fresh or dry, made from
flours and water; eggs; fresh or frozen meat and fish and
fresh or pasteurised milk); ‘processed culinary ingredi-
ents’ (including sugar, oils, fats, salt and other substances
extracted from foods and used in kitchens to season and
cook unprocessed or minimally processed foods and to
make culinary preparations), ‘processed foods’ (including
canned foods, sugar-coated dry fruits, salted meat prod-
ucts, cheeses and freshly made unpackaged breads, and
other ready-to-consume products manufactured with the
addition of salt or sugar or other substances of culinary
use to unprocessed or minimally processed foods) and
‘ultra-processed foods’.
Ultra-processed foods, of particular interest in this study,
include soft drinks, sweet or savoury packaged snacks,
confectionery and industrialised desserts, mass-produced
packaged breads and buns, poultry and fish nuggets and
other reconstituted meat products, instant noodles and
soups, and many other ready-to-consume formulations
of several ingredients. Besides salt, sugar, oils and fats,
these ingredients include food substances not commonly
used in culinary preparations, such as modified starches,
hydrogenated oils, protein isolates and classes of addi-
tives whose purpose is to imitate sensorial qualities of
unprocessed or minimally processed foods and their culi-
nary preparations, or to disguise undesirable qualities
of the final product. These additives include colourants,
flavourings, non-sugar sweeteners, emulsifiers, humec-
tants, sequestrants, and firming, bulking, de-foaming,
anticaking and glazing agents. Unprocessed or minimally
processed foods represent a small proportion of or are
even absent from the list of ingredients of ultra-processed
products. The rationale underlying the classification, a
detailed definition of each NOVA food group and exam-
ples of food items classified in each group has been previ-
ously published.1
For all food items (Food Codes) judged to be a hand-
made recipe, the classification was applied to the under-
lying ingredients (Standard Reference Codes or SR
Codes) obtained from the US Department of Agriculture
(USDA) Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies
(FNDDS 4.0, 5.0 and 6.6). For example, for cakes, cookies
or pies underlying SR Codes were used unless underlying
SR Codes or ingredients were unlikely to be used in home
recipe (ie, ‘cellulose (alpha-cellulose, powdered cellu-
lose and poly-cellulose)’ or ‘oil, industrial, soy (partially
hydrogenated), multiuse for non-dairy butter flavour’
or ‘shortening, industrial, soybean (hydrogenated) and
cottonseed’, or ‘whey, sweet, dried’).
Other examples are ‘salsa, red, cooked, not home-
made’ and ‘salsa, red, cooked, homemade’. Food Code
‘salsa, red, cooked, not homemade’ was classified as
ultra-processed based on information from a similar
product included in the Food Code website (‘Red Gold
Salsa, Mild’: tomato concentrate (water, tomato paste),
diced tomatoes, jalapeno peppers, green chiles, yellow
chiles, vinegar, salt, dried onion, dried garlic, cilantro,
natural flavour). On the other hand, for Food Code
‘salsa, red, cooked, homemade’ it was each underlying SR
Code (salt, table; garlic, raw; onions, raw; tomatoes, red,
ripe, canned, packed in tomato juice; peppers, hot chiles,
sun dried; water, tap, drinking; vegetable oil) instead, that
was classified according to NOVA, as further explained in
a previously published paper.1
Assessing energy content
For this study, Food code energy values were used as
provided by NHANES.
For handmade recipes, the underlying ingredient
(SR Code) energy values were calculated using variables
from both FNDDS (4.0, 5.0 or 6.6) and USDA National
Nutrient Database for SR, Release 23, 24 or 25 (SR23,
SR24 or SR25) depending on the NHANES cycle.
Data analysis
Dietary intake was assessed using means of both recall
days when available and 1 day otherwise.
Food items were sorted into mutually exclusive food
subgroups within unprocessed or minimally processed
foods (n=11 subgroups), processed culinary ingredi-
ents (n=4), processed foods (n=5) and ultra-processed
foods (n=11), as shown in table 1. The dietary intake was
described according to the average absolute (total daily
energy intake) and relative (expressed as a percentage of
the total caloric value of the diet) consumption, provided
by each NOVA food group and subgroups within these
groups.
Crude and multivariate-adjusted linear regressions
were used to evaluate the association between socio-
demographic characteristics and dietary contribution
of ultra-processed foods. Tests of linear trend were
performed in order to assess the effect of age, education
and income as single continuous variables. Linear regres-
sion was also used to assess how the mean dietary share
of ultra-processed foods varied across the three studied
cycles, both overall and according to age group, gender,
education, income and ethnicity. In order to estimate the
evolution of ultra-processed food consumption, Wald tests
were performed to compare 2007–2008 and 2011–2012
values. Interaction tests were used to explore differential
effects of time across sociodemographic variables. Tests of
linear trend across the whole period were also performed.
group.bmj.com on March 10, 2018 - Published by http://bmjopen.bmj.com/Downloaded from
4BaraldiLG, etal. BMJ Open 2018;8:e020574. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020574
Open Access
Table 1 Distribution of daily energy intake according to NOVA food groups
Food groups
Mean energy intake
(kcal) SE
Mean percentage of
total energy intake SE
Unprocessed or minimally processed foods 537.3 6.4 27.4 0.3
Cereal 99.4 2.8 5.0 0.1
Meat 94.2 2.3 4.6 0.1
Milk 88.6 1.6 4.5 0.1
Poultry 67.3 1.8 3.4 0.1
Fruits 58.2 1.3 3.2 0.1
Roots and tubers 34.6 0.9 1.8 0.0
Eggs 29.8 0.7 1.5 0.0
Legumes 17.8 0.8 0.9 0.0
Fish 15.4 0.9 0.8 0.0
Vegetables 13.9 0.4 0.8 0.0
Other* 18.1 0.7 0.9 0.0
Processed culinary ingredients 85.2 1.5 4.1 0.1
Plant oils 32.1 0.9 1.5 0.9
Sugar 26.3 0.7 1.3 0.7
Animal fats 25.1 0.8 1.2 0.8
Other† 1.6 0.2 0.1 0.2
Processed foods 215.3 4.8 10.0 0.2
Cheese 79.4 1.7 3.7 0.1
Ham and other salted, smoked or canned meat
or sh 28.1 0.7 1.4 0.0
Vegetables and other plant foods preserved in
brine 14.9 0.5 0.7 0.0
Fruits in syrup, jams, marmalades 9.1 0.4 0.5 0.0
Other‡ 83.8 2.7 3.7 0.1
Ultra-processed foods 1205.4 7.8 58.5 0.3
Breads 197.6 2.6 9.9 0.1
Frozen/shelf-stable dishes§ 185.7 3.9 8.6 0.1
Confectionery 128.0 2.6 6.3 0.1
Fruit and milk drinks 114.3 1.8 5.8 0.1
Cakes, cookies and pies 123.6 2.2 5.7 0.1
Soft drinks 96.0 3.2 4.6 0.2
Saltysnacks 85.4 1.9 4.1 0.1
Breakfast cereals 56.8 1.1 3.0 0.1
Sauces, dressings and gravies 51.7 1.2 2.5 0.1
Sausages, hamburgers, reconstituted meat
products
51.0 1.3 2.4 0.1
Other¶ 115.3 1.8 5.6 0.0
All foods 2043.2 9.6 100.0
US population aged≥2 years(NHANES 2007–2012).
*Including nuts and seeds (unsalted); yeast; dried fruits (without added sugars) and vegetables; non-presweetened, non-whitened,
non-avoured coffee and tea; coconut water and meat; homemade soup and sauces; ours; tapioca.
†Including starches; coconut and milk cream; unsweetened baking chocolate, cocoa powder and gelatin powder; vinegar; baking
powder and baking soda.
‡Including salted or sugared nuts and seeds; peanut, sesame, cashew and almond butter or spread; beer and wine.
§Including pizzas and ready-to-eat dishes.
¶Including soy products such as meatless patties and sh sticks; baby food and baby formula; dips, spreads, mustard and catsup;
margarine; sugar substitutes, sweeteners and all syrups (excluding 100% maple syrup); distilled alcoholic drinks.
NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
group.bmj.com on March 10, 2018 - Published by http://bmjopen.bmj.com/Downloaded from
5
BaraldiLG, etal. BMJ Open 2018;8:e020574. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020574
Open Access
NHANES sample weights were used in all analyses to
account for differential probabilities of selection for the
individual domains, non-response to survey instruments
and differences between the final sample and the total
US population. The Taylor series linearisation variance
approximation procedure was used for variance estima-
tion, in order to account for the complex sample design
and the sample weights.15
Statistical hypotheses were tested using a two-tailed
P<0.05 level of significance. Data were analysed using
Stata/SE statistical software package version 14.1.
RESULTS
Distribution of total energy intake according to NOVA food
groups
The average US daily energy intake in 2007–2012 was
2042.5 kcal, and most calories (58.5%) came from
ultra-processed foods. Unprocessed or minimally
processed foods contributed 27.5% of total energy,
processed foods an additional 10.0% and processed culi-
nary ingredients the remaining 4.0% (table 1).
Within ultra-processed foods, most calories came from
breads and frozen/shelf-stable meals (9.9% and 8.6% of
total daily intake, respectively), followed by confectionery
(6.1%), fruit and milk drinks (5.8%), cakes, cookies and
pies (5.7%), soft drinks (4.6%), salty snacks (4.1%) and
breakfast cereals (3.0%) (table 1).
All together food of animal origin accounted for more
than a half of calories of unprocessed or minimally
processed foods (approximately 15% of total calories),
with milk corresponding to 4.7% of total calories, meat
4.5%, poultry 3.4% and eggs 1.5%. Among processed
foods, most calories came from cheese (3.7% of daily calo-
ries) and ham or other salted, smoked or canned meat
or fish (1.4%). Plant oils (1.5%) and table sugar (2.3%)
were the highest calorie contributors among processed
culinary ingredients (table 1).
Association of sociodemographic characteristics with the
dietary contribution of ultra-processed foods
Except for gender, all other sociodemographic charac-
teristics were associated with the dietary contribution of
ultra-processed foods. Both the crude and adjusted contri-
bution decreased with age, education and income. The
non-adjusted contribution was highest among non-His-
panic blacks (62.1% of total energy intake), followed
by non-Hispanic whites (59.2%), Mexican-American
(57.7%), other Hispanic (53.5%) and other (49.9%).
Adjusted estimates indicated similar consumption among
non-Hispanic black and non-Hispanic white but did not
change substantially the consumption of the other ethnic
groups (table 2).
Time changes in the dietary contribution of ultra-processed
foods
As shown in table 3, the overall dietary contribution of
ultra-processed foods linearly increased across the three
cycles (P<0.05): from 57.6% in 2007–2008 to 59.7% in
2011–2012 (nearly +1% per cycle). The same statistically
significant linear time trend was found for men, adoles-
cents and respondents with high school education. These
linear trends remained unchanged after adjusting for
sociodemographic variables (data not shown). Further-
more, when comparing the last cycle against the first one,
an increase in the consumption of ultra-processed foods
was observed for all sociodemographic strata, ranging
from a minimum of +1.4% (in high income/poverty family
ratio) and a maximum of +3.6% (in other race). Signif-
icant interaction terms were found for gender-year and
age-year (P<0.05).
DISCUSSION
This study of recent and representative data of US popula-
tion shows that ultra-processed foods represented nearly
60% of dietary calories over a 6-year period. Small differ-
ences in consumption within the population reflect how
ultra-processed foods have permeated and reached all
social strata, modifying eating behaviours by displacing
handmade meals and turning ultra-processed food
consumption into an important eating pattern. Individ-
uals with a college education consumed the least ultra-pro-
cessed foods whereas adolescents and American black
and white ethnic groups were the highest consumers.
Ultra-processed food consumption was inversely associ-
ated with both age and income levels and did not vary
according to sex.
There was an overall time trend increase in ultra-pro-
cessed consumption between 2007–2008 and 2011–2012,
and more specifically among men, adolescents and
individuals with high school education. Among middle
income-to-poverty ratio individuals and non-Hispanic
white Americans, an increase in ultra-processed food
consumption was observed between the first and last
cycles.
Population-based studies evaluating ultra-processed
food consumption according to sociodemographic vari-
ables carried out in different countries obtained similar
results. In the UK (2008–2009), the average ultra-pro-
cessed food consumption was 53% of total energy intake
and decreased with age (from 58.2% among 18–29
years to 50.6% among 70+ years).18 In Canada (2004),
the average consumption of ultra-processed foods was
47.7% remaining high in all socioeconomic groups,
especially among children and adolescents (55.1%) and
less educated individuals (51.7%).19 In Chile (2010) and
Mexico (2012), ultra-processed food consumption was
much lower than in USA—28.6% and 29.8%, respec-
tively—and also decreased with age.20 21 In Chile, ultra-pro-
cessed food consumption increased with family income
from 25.8% to 30.1% of total energy intake.20 In Mexico,
ultra-processed food consumption increased with socio-
economic status (SES).21 In a cohort study carried out in
France (including participants recruited between 2009
and 2014), ultra-processed foods contributed 35.9% of
group.bmj.com on March 10, 2018 - Published by http://bmjopen.bmj.com/Downloaded from
6BaraldiLG, etal. BMJ Open 2018;8:e020574. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020574
Open Access
total energy intake and consumption was higher among
younger aged and lower educated individuals.22
While our study observed an increase in ultra-processed
food consumption between 2007 and 2012, an investiga-
tion using the alternative index of diet quality showed an
increase in US adult diet quality between 1999 and 2012.23
This stands in apparent contradiction if we take into
account results from studies on NHANES food intake and
on national US household food purchases. Indeed, these
studies have demonstrated that the dietary contribution
of ultra-processed foods is inversely associated with the
dietary content of protein, fibre, and most micronutri-
ents and directly associated with carbohydrate, saturated
fat, total sugar, added sugar and sodium contents.14 24
Still, it must be noted that more than 50% of the improve-
ment in AHEI-2010 overall score was attributed to a
reduction in trans fat intake,25 which is not inconsis-
tent with an increasing consumption of ultra-processed
foods, especially in view of the reduction in trans fat use
in industrial products. The limits of ultra-processed food
reformulation have been discussed elsewhere.26
The negative gradient between age group and
ultra-processed food consumption is consistent with
the significant positive association observed between
age and dietary quality in US adults from 1999 to
2010.23 This negative gradient may be shaped by differ-
ential age-dependent food preferences.27 Indeed,
children and adolescents may have a higher demand
of ultra-processed foods because of a greater promo-
tion through marketing and advertising among these
age groups,28 and also availability in school food
environment. The influence of the school food envi-
ronment, including school vending machines and
school stores/canteens/snack bars, on children and
adolescents’ dietary intake is well known.29 Indeed, in
recent years, the healthiness of diets among children
Table 2 Dietary contribution of ultra-processed foods according to sociodemographic variables
Variables
% of energy intake from ultra-
processed foods
Crude mean (95% CI) Adjusted mean† (95% CI)
Gender
Male 58.4(57.6to59.1) 58.3(57.6to59.0)
Female 58.6(57.9to59.4) 58.8(58.1to59.5)
Age group
2–9 65.2(64.3to66.1) 65.9(65.0to66.8)
10–19 66.7(65.9to67.5) 66.8(65.9to67.7)
20–39 59.0(58.0to60.1) 59.5(58.7to60.3)
40–59 55.2(54.0to56.3) 55.2(54.1to56.4)
≥60 53.5(52.5to54.4)* 52.8(51.9to53.7)*
Education‡
Less than high school 59.0(57.9to60.0) 59.5(58.4to60.6)
High school 59.9(59.2to60.6) 59.7(59.1to60.3)
College or higher 55.4(54.2to56.8)* 55.9(54.6to57.2)*
Family income-to-poverty ratio§
≤1.30 61.1(60.0to62.2) 59.6(58.6to60.7)
1.31–1.50 58.9(57.9to59.9) 58.7(57.8to59.7)
>1.50 56.8(55.9to57.8)* 57.7(56.9to58.6)*
Ethnicity
Non-Hispanic white 59.2(58.4to60.1) 60.2(59.4to60.9)
Non-Hispanic black 62.1(61.1to63.3) 60.6(59.7to61.5)
Mexican-American 57.7(56.7to58.8) 54.8(53.2to56.3)
Other Hispanic 53.3(51.5to55.1) 52.0(50.3to53.7)
Other 49.9(47.7to52.2) 49.6(47.3to51.8)*
US population aged≥2 years(NHANES 2007–2012).
*P for linear trend<0.05.
†Adjusted for all the other variables in the table.
‡For individuals under 25 years, the education of the household head was considered.
§Income-to-poverty ratios represent the ratio of family or unrelated individual income to their appropriate poverty threshold. Categories based
on SNAP eligibility.38
NHANES,National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; SNAP, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
group.bmj.com on March 10, 2018 - Published by http://bmjopen.bmj.com/Downloaded from
7
BaraldiLG, etal. BMJ Open 2018;8:e020574. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020574
Open Access
and adolescents are the ones to have declined the
most. Snacks, pizzas, pastries, sweetened fruit juices
and ready-made Mexican dishes (mixed dishes with
corn or flour tortillas and corn-based dishes), most
of them ultra-processed foods, were the ones to
present the greatest caloric intake increase in the last
20 years among American children aged 2–6 years.30
In addition, in the last decades among adolescents,
a total of 17% of all calories came from fast food.24
All these previous findings are consistent with our
findings of higher ultra-processed food consumption
among younger age groups and positive time trend in
ultra-processed food intake among adolescents.
Although some studies have reported that non-His-
panic black Americans have less favourable dietary
patterns than non-Hispanic white Americans,31 in our
study both groups presented the highest consumption of
ultra-processed foods. A previous study also showed that
in most NHANES survey cycles between 1999 and 2010,
non-Hispanic whites had a significantly lower dietary
quality than Mexican-Americans adults.23 A possible
explanation for differences between non-Hispanic white
and non-Hispanic black Americans and the remaining
ethnicities may be greater promotion and advertising
of ultra-processed foods to these race/ethnicities.32
Differences may also arise from the fact that house-
holds with foreign-born reference persons tend to cook
more dinners at home than those with US-born refer-
ence person32 perhaps in an attempt to maintain their
culinary traditions or out of simple routine and not
having been fully acculturated to the fast food culture
yet. However, it is known that throughout the process
of acculturation (at least among Mexicans), migrants
progressively incorporate negative eating habits and
with the passing of the generations end up adhering to
the North American diet.33
Table 3 Time changes in the dietary contribution of ultra-processed foods (% or total energy intake) according to
sociodemographic variables
Variables 2007–2008 2009–2010 2011–2012
Pvalue for linear
trend
Gender
Male 57.3 58.8 59.7 0.0368
Female 57.9 58.9 59.6 0.1834
Age group
2–9 63.4 63.9 65.4 0.4518
10–19 64.9 67.0 68.3 0.0128
20–39 58.0 59.2 59.9 0.3529
40–59 54.2 55.0 56.3 0.3821
≥60 52.1 54.2 54.0 0.1800
Education
Less than high school 58.0 58.6 60.4 0.1632
High school 58.4 60.2 61.1 0.0122
College 54.4 55.9 56.0 0.4667
Family income-to-poverty ratio†
≤1.30 60.6 60.9 62.6 0.1910
1.31–3.50 57.7 59.5 60.1 0.0380
>3.50 56.1 57.4 57.5 0.2310
Ethnicity
Non-Hispanic white 57.9 59.4 60.4* 0.0749
Non-Hispanic black 61.6 61.1 63.6 0.1512
Mexican-American 56.4 58.4 58.3 0.0501
Other Hispanic 51.4 55.3 53.1 0.2563
Other Race 47.4 50.5 51.0 0.4002
Total 57.6 58.9 59.7 0.038
US population aged≥2 years(NHANES 2007–2012).
*P<0.05 Wald test for difference in consumption between the rst (2007–2008) and the last (2011–2012) cycles.
†Income-to-poverty ratios represent the ratio of family or unrelated individual income to their appropriate poverty threshold. Categories based
on SNAP eligibility.38
NHANES,National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; SNAP, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
group.bmj.com on March 10, 2018 - Published by http://bmjopen.bmj.com/Downloaded from
8BaraldiLG, etal. BMJ Open 2018;8:e020574. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020574
Open Access
The small inverse association between education and
ultra-processed food consumption is consistent with
previous findings of direct association between education
and dietary quality of adults in all cycles between 1999
and 2010.23 Increased knowledge about nutrition and
concern with health may lead individuals to value nutri-
tion over taste and convenience when choosing foods
among more highly educated individuals.27
Also for income, the small inverse association with
ultra-processed food consumption is consistent with
previous findings of direct association between income
and dietary quality (AHEI-2010) of adults from 1999 to
2010.23 On the other hand, the fact that only a small nega-
tive gradient was found between SES and ultra-processed
food consumption, counters the stereotype that lower-in-
come individuals are higher consumers of ultra-processed
foods because of price. As previously highlighted in others
studies eating ‘junk food’ is not necessarily cheaper than
eating ‘real food’.34–36 Our results are also consistent with
those from a recent US study showing little evidence of
a gradient in adult fast-food consumption in regards to
income/wealth.27 If consumer’s food choices should
depend on price, income, household manager’s time
and preferences,37 our study shows that the cumulative
effect of all four did not lead to an important differen-
tial consumption of ultra-processed foods across income
strata.
SES disparities in health are thought to be partially
caused by an SES gradient in nutrition23 31 Our study
suggests that a gradient in ultra-processed food consump-
tion is probably not the main or only underlying reason
for these health inequities. Indeed, ultra-processed food
consumption was high overall, despite being slightly
higher among less educated, younger, lower income and
American non-Hispanic black and non-Hispanic white
strata. Healthier eating should be encouraged among
all sociodemographic strata especially by promoting
healthier food environments (in schools among others)
and regulating marketing.28 29
The probabilistic nature of the studied sample and
the national representativeness of the American popula-
tion are strengths of this study. Study limitations should
be considered. Recall bias may lead to underestimation
of ultra-processed food consumption, especially if some
individuals tend to under-report these types of food
items. Should this under-reporting have increased with
time in response to a growing awareness of health effects
of ultra-processed foods, this could result in a greater
underestimation of ultra-processed foods in later years.
Still, recall bias should be minimised through the use of
the five-step validated USDA’s Automated Multiple-Pass
Method. As NHANES was not specifically designed to
classify food items according to degree of processing,
misclassification errors may lead to underestimation or
overestimation of ultra-processed food consumption.
Cases of classification uncertainty were solved using a
conservative approach, opting for the lesser degree of
processing or assuming a homemade recipe, which could
have led to underestimation of ultra-processed food
consumption.
Social desirability bias may lead to underestimation of
ultra-processed food consumption. Should this under-re-
porting have increased with time in response to a growing
awareness of the health effects of ultra-processed foods,
this could result in a greater underestimation of ultra-pro-
cessed food consumption in later years. Differential social
desirability bias across socioeconomic groups (should this
exist) could lead to both underestimation or overestima-
tion of the studied associations.
Even though data from two 24-hour dietary recalls may
not represent the usual diet of individuals, these data can
be useful to estimate group means as was done in this
study. Though analyses were controlled for several socio-
demographic variables, residual confounding by variables
such as region or urban/rural area is always possible.
CONCLUSION
In this study, we show that ultra-processed food consump-
tion in the USA in the period 2007–2012 was overall high,
greater among less educated, younger, lower income and
American non-Hispanic black and non-Hispanic white
strata, and increased across time. Healthier eating should
be promoted among all sociodemographic groups, espe-
cially among children and adolescents, which have been
shown to be the highest consumers of ultra-processed
foods in several countries.
Contributors CAM and LGB designed the research. LGB and EMS took care of
data management. LGB, EMS and DSC analysed the data. LGB, EMS and CAM
wrote the paper. CAM and LGB had primary responsibility for the nal content. All
authors revised critically the nal version to be published, had full access to all of
the data (including statistical reports and tables), read and ofcially approved the
nal version. All authors absolutely agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the
study.
Funding This work was supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento
Cientíco e Tecnológico, Edital MCTI/CNPq/Universal (Processo CNPq number
443477/2014-0) and from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
(Processo FAPESP number 2015/14900-9).
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Obtained.
Ethics approval Secondary publicly available data from NHAES were used in this
study. NHANES obtained Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board approval by
NCHS Research Ethics Review Board under Continuation of Protocol #2005-06 and
Protocol #2011-17 for 2007–2008/2009–2010 cycles and for 2011–2012 cycle,
respectively.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement This study is based on open data of the American
population that is available by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in their
website: https://www. cdc. gov/ nchs/ nhanes/ index. htm.
Open Access This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which
permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially,
and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is
properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http:// creativecommons. org/
licenses/ by- nc/ 4. 0/
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the
article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise
expressly granted.
group.bmj.com on March 10, 2018 - Published by http://bmjopen.bmj.com/Downloaded from
9
BaraldiLG, etal. BMJ Open 2018;8:e020574. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020574
Open Access
REFERENCES
1. Martínez Steele E, Baraldi LG, Louzada ML, et al. Ultra-processed
foods and added sugars in the US diet: evidence from a nationally
representative cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2016;6:e009892.
2. Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Moubarac JC, et al. The UN Decade of
Nutrition, the NOVA food classication and the trouble with ultra-
processing. Public Health Nutr 2018.21.
3. Micha R, Khatibzadeh S, Shi P, et al. Global, regional and national
consumption of major food groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic
analysis including 266 country-specic nutrition surveys worldwide.
BMJ Open 2015;5:e008705.
4. Singh GM, Micha R, Khatibzadeh S, et al. Global, regional, and
national consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, fruit juices,
and milk: a systematic assessment of beverage intake in 187
Countries. PLoS One 2015;10:e0124845.
5. Louzada ML, Baraldi LG, Steele EM, et al. Consumption of ultra-
processed foods and obesity in Brazilian adolescents and adults.
Prev Med 2015;81:9–15.
6. Canella DS, Levy RB, Martins AP, et al. Ultra-processed food
products and obesity in Brazilian households (2008-2009). PLoS One
2014;9:e92752.
7. Tavares LF, Fonseca SC, Garcia Rosa ML, et al. Relationship
between ultra-processed foods and metabolic syndrome in
adolescents from a Brazilian Family Doctor Program. Public Health
Nutr 2012;15:1–6.
8. Mendonça RD, Pimenta AM, Gea A, et al. Ultraprocessed food
consumption and risk of overweight and obesity: the University
of Navarra Follow-Up (SUN) cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr
2016;104:1433–40.
9. Rauber F, Campagnolo PD, Hoffman DJ, et al. Consumption of ultra-
processed food products and its effects on children's lipid proles: a
longitudinal study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2015;25:116–22.
10. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK, et al. Prevalence of obesity and trends
in the distribution of body mass index among us adults, 1999-2010.
JAMA 2012;307:491–7.
11. Murray CJ, Atkinson C, Bhalla K, et al. The state of US health,
1990-2010: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. JAMA
2013;310:591–608.
12. Hawkes C. Uneven dietary development: linking the policies and
processes of globalization with the nutrition transition, obesity and
diet-related chronic diseases. Global Health 2006;2:4.
13. Stuckler D, McKee M, Ebrahim S, et al. Manufacturing epidemics:
the role of global producers in increased consumption of unhealthy
commodities including processed foods, alcohol, and tobacco. PLoS
Med 2012;9:e1001235.
14. Martínez Steele E, Popkin BM, Swinburn B, et al. The share of ultra-
processed foods and the overall nutritional quality of diets in the
US: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study.
Popul Health Metr 2017;15:6.
15. Johnson CL, Paulose-Ram R, Cl O, et al. National Health and
Nutrition Examination Survey: Analytic guidelines, 1999–2010.
National Center for Health Statistics 2013.
16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). NC for HS
(NCHS. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Measuring
Guides for the Dietary Recall Interview. 2015. https://www. cdc. gov/
nchs/ nhanes/ measuring_ guides_ dri/ measuringguides. htm
17. U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division,Fertility & Family Statistics
Branch. Current Population Survey: denitions and explanations.
2004. http://www. census. gov/ population/ www/ cps/ cpsdef. html
(accessed 18 Aug 2017).
18. Adams J, White M. Characterisation of UK diets according to degree
of food processing and associations with socio-demographics and
obesity: cross-sectional analysis of UK National Diet and Nutrition
Survey (2008-12). Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2015;12:160.
19. Moubarac JC, Batal M, Louzada ML, et al. Consumption of
ultra-processed foods predicts diet quality in Canada. Appetite
2017;108:512–20.
20. Cediel G, Reyes M, da Costa Louzada ML, et al. Ultra-processed
foods and added sugars in the Chilean diet (2010). Public Health Nutr
2017.9.
21. Marrón-Ponce JA, Sánchez-Pimienta TG, Louzada M, et al.
Energy contribution of NOVA food groups and sociodemographic
determinants of ultra-processed food consumption in the Mexican
population. Public Health Nutr 2018.21.
22. Julia C, Martinez L, Allès B, et al. Contribution of ultra-processed
foods in the diet of adults from the French NutriNet-Santé study.
Public Health Nutr 2018.21.
23. Wang DD, Leung CW, Li Y, et al. Trends in dietary quality among
adults in the United States, 1999 through 2010. JAMA Intern Med
2014;174:1587–95.
24. Poti JM, Popkin BM. Trends in energy intake among US children
by eating location and food source, 1977-2006. J Am Diet Assoc
2011;111:1156–64.
25. Wang DD, Li Y, Chiuve SE, et al. Improvements In US diet helped
reduce disease burden and lower premature Deaths, 1999-2012;
Overall Diet Remains Poor. Health Aff 2015;34:1916–22.
26. Reformulation SG. fortication and functionalization: big food
corporations’ nutritional engineering and marketing strategies. J
Peasant Stud 2016;43:17–37.
27. Zagorsky JL, Smith PK. The association between socioeconomic
status and adult fast-food consumption in the U.S. Econ Hum Biol
2017;27:12–25.
28. Boyland EJ, Nolan S, Kelly B, et al. Advertising as a cue to consume:
a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of acute
exposure to unhealthy food and nonalcoholic beverage advertising
on intake in children and adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2016;103:519–33.
29. Kubik MY, Wall M, Shen L, et al. State but not district nutrition
policies are associated with less junk food in vending machines
and school stores in US public schools. J Am Diet Assoc
2010;110:1043–8.
30. Ford CN, Slining MM, Popkin BM. Trends in dietary intake among
US 2- to 6-year-old children, 1989-2008. J Acad Nutr Diet
2013;113:35–42.
31. Kirkpatrick SI, Dodd KW, Reedy J, et al. Income and race/ethnicity
are associated with adherence to food-based dietary guidance
among US adults and children. J Acad Nutr Diet 2012;112:624–35.
32. Virudachalam S, Long JA, Harhay MO, et al. Prevalence and patterns
of cooking dinner at home in the USA: National Health and Nutrition
Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2008. Public Health Nutr
2014;17:1022–30.
33. Batis C, Hernandez-Barrera L, Barquera S, et al. Food acculturation
drives dietary differences among Mexicans, Mexican Americans, and
Non-Hispanic Whites. J Nutr 2011;141:1898–906.
34. Bittman M. Is junk food really cheaper? The New York Times 2011.
http://www. nytimes. com/ 2011/ 09/ 25/ opinion/ sunday/ is- junk- food-
really- cheaper. html (accessed 6 Oct 2017).
35. Rao M, Afshin A, Singh G, et al. Do healthier foods and diet patterns
cost more than less healthy options? A systematic review and meta-
analysis. BMJ Open 2013;3:e004277.
36. Kern DM, Auchincloss AH, Robinson LF, et al. Healthy and unhealthy
food prices across neighborhoods and their association with
neighborhood socioeconomic status and proportion black/hispanic.
J Urban Health 2017;94:494–505.
37. Becker GS. A theory of the allocation of time. Econ J
1965;75:493–517.
38. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Poverty guidelines,
research, and measurement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Health & Human Services, 2012.
group.bmj.com on March 10, 2018 - Published by http://bmjopen.bmj.com/Downloaded from
study
nationally representative cross-sectional
USA between 2007 and 2012: evidence from a
associated sociodemographic factors in the
Consumption of ultra-processed foods and
and Carlos Augusto Monteiro
Larissa Galastri Baraldi, Euridice Martinez Steele, Daniela Silva Canella
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020574
2018 8: BMJ Open
http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/8/3/e020574
Updated information and services can be found at:
These include:
References http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/8/3/e020574#ref-list-1
This article cites 29 articles, 7 of which you can access for free at:
Open Access
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/non-commercial. See:
provided the original work is properly cited and the use is
non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms,
permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work
Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative
service
Email alerting box at the top right corner of the online article.
Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up in the
Notes
http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
To request permissions go to:
http://journals.bmj.com/cgi/reprintform
To order reprints go to:
http://group.bmj.com/subscribe/
To subscribe to BMJ go to:
group.bmj.com on March 10, 2018 - Published by http://bmjopen.bmj.com/Downloaded from
... Consistent with other studies, we found that lower educational status (less than 7 years of schooling) was associated with higher UPP consumption [32,56]. Additionally, consistent with other studies, the current study found that more men than women reportedly consumed UPP [56,57]. ...
... Consistent with other studies, we found that lower educational status (less than 7 years of schooling) was associated with higher UPP consumption [32,56]. Additionally, consistent with other studies, the current study found that more men than women reportedly consumed UPP [56,57]. Females are reported to be more aware of nutrition information due to higher exposure to food-and health-related information [58]. ...
... Being above 60 years of age was positively associated with increased UPP consumption in the current study, contrary to findings by other authors who reported lower UPP among older people [56,59]. According to Marchese et al. [57], it is not uncommon for older adults to indulge in unhealthy dietary behaviors. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective: To investigate the perceived healthfulness, nutrient content awareness, consumption, and intention to purchase selected ultraprocessed products (UPP) and their sociodemographic determinants. Design: Cross-sectional study involving secondary data analysis. Setting: This study was conducted in all nine provinces of South Africa. Participants: In total, 1951 adults (18–50 years), with 63.5% females and 66.3% from low socioeconomic group. Methods: Participants were shown A4 images of mock-branded UPP, with no nutrition information provided. Questions asked were based on the images to determine the nutrient content awareness, healthfulness perception, consumption frequency, and intention to purchase the UPP based on sociodemographic characteristics. Analysis: Descriptive statistics were conducted for nutrient content awareness, perceived healthfulness, consumption, and intention to purchase UPP. Associations with sociodemographic variables were determined using regression analyses: logistic regression for perceived healthfulness and nutrient content awareness, ordinary least square regression for UPP consumption, and intention to purchase was modeled as a latent variable in a multiple indicators multiple cause (MIMIC) model. Results: Over a third of participants (41.8%) were not aware that fruit juice is high in sugar. Only 13% of the participants perceived fruit juice as unhealthy and more than 50% showed the intention to purchase fruit juice, cereals, and yoghurt in the future. More than 50% reported consuming most UPP either daily or weekly. Perceived healthfulness was associated with gender, while UPP consumption was associated with education, age, gender, and being unemployed. Intention to purchase UPP was the only variable associated with socioeconomic status. Conclusion and Implications: Intervention strategies such as simplified front-of-pack labeling may have a role in improving nutrition awareness and discouraging UPP consumption.
... By age, younger individuals, particularly adolescents, consume more UPFs than older adults. 24,25,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38] Socioeconomic status, represented by variables such as income, education, and residence, strongly influence UPF consumption; however, the patterns vary by national economic status. ...
... In high-income countries such as the US, UK, and France, low-income and less-educated individuals tend to consume more UPFs than those with higher socioeconomic status. 34,35,38 In contrast, in middle-and low-income countries, those with higher education and income and those living in urban areas consume more UPFs than their lower-income and rural counterparts. 32,36,37,39,40 ...
... Por ejemplo, se ha observado que muchos padres desconocen la asociación entre los azúcares libres presentes en los alimentos procesados y el riesgo de caries y enfermedades periodontales (12,15), en comunidades con menor acceso a educación en salud, como las rurales y marginadas, este desconocimiento es aún Sanitas Revista arbitrada de ciencias de la salud Vol. 3(Especial odontología UNIANDES), 290-296, 2024 Consecuencias dentales por ingesta excesiva de alimentos procesados en niños de 10 a 12 años Dental consequences of excessive intake of processed foods in children aged 10 to 12 years old Katy May Keery-Torres Melanie Nahomy Bonilla-Salgado Patricio Alejandro Tingo-Valencia Gladys Viviana Urrego-Cueva 292 más pronunciado (2,7). En este contexto, los programas educativos dirigidos a padres y cuidadores han demostrado ser efectivos para reducir el consumo de alimentos perjudiciales, mejorando tanto los hábitos alimenticios como las prácticas de higiene oral en los niños (1,15). ...
Article
Full-text available
Objetivo: analizar las consecuencias dentales por ingesta excesiva de alimentos procesados en niños de 10 a 12 años. Método: descriptiva observacional en 86 participantes. Resultados y Conclusión: En términos generales, el 98.8% de los padres reconoce que los alimentos procesados impactan la salud, lo que refleja una percepción significativa sobre sus efectos perjudiciales. Sin embargo, solo el 41.9% cree que los programas educativos podrían ser efectivos para reducir el consumo de estos alimentos, mientras que un 48.8% mostró incertidumbre sobre su impacto.
... UPFs have become central to modern diets, offering convenience and enhanced flavors, but are calorie dense and high in refined grains, added salt, sugar, and saturated fats [73,74]. All nations are shifting toward UPFdominated diets, especially in the West [75], where they now account for nearly half of total caloric intake in the United States [76][77][78], the United Kingdom [79], Canada [80], and Australia [81], with rising consumption also noted in Asia [82,83]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Food allergies are increasing globally, particularly in Asia; however, the etiologies of allergic diseases remain poorly understood despite comprehensive studies conducted across a variety of populations. Epidemiological research demonstrates that food allergy is more prevalent in Westernized or urbanized societies than in rural or developing ones. As such, comparing the distribution and patterns of food allergies as well as the environmental exposures between regions may provide insight into potential causal and protective factors of food allergy. Diet is an important exposome that has been shown to modulate the immune system both directly and indirectly via pathways involving the microbiota. Changes in dietary patterns, especially the shift to a Westernized diet with reduced dietary fiber and an abundance of processed foods, impact the gut and skin epithelial barrier and contribute to the development of chronic inflammatory diseases, such as food allergy. Although dietary intervention is believed to have tremendous potential as a strategy to promote immunological health, it is essential to recognize that diet is only one of many factors that have changed in urbanized societies. Other factors, such as pollution, microplastics, the use of medications like antibiotics, and exposure to biodiversity and animals, may also play significant roles, and further research is needed to determine which exposures are most critical for the development of food allergies.
... Despite the recognized differences in food consumption patterns caused by the age of individuals 6,7,22 , in this study this variable was not added to the mixed linear model, as it did not show a significant effect on consumption when considering the different intersections with the other sociodemographic factors. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective: To evaluate the heterogeneity in the consumption of fresh or minimally processed foods (FMPF) and ultra-processed foods (UPF) in the Brazilian population ≥10 years of age. Methods: Cross-sectional study that used data from the food consumption and resident module from the 2017–2018 edition of the Family Budget Survey. Variables relating to sex, region of residence, household status and per capita family income in minimum wages were used. The outcomes were dietary participation in percentage of FMPF and UPF. Heterogeneity was assessed using random effects produced by linear mixed-effects models. Results: Thirty-two random effects were obtained for the consumption of FMPF and 34 for UPF. Living in the urban area of the South and Southeast regions, as well as having a higher income were driving factors in the consumption of UPF and reducing the consumption of FMPF. Living in a rural area and having low income were mainly reducing factors in the consumption of UPF and driving factors in the consumption of FMPF. Conclusions: The consumption of UPF and FMPF was determined by the set of factors that represented easy access to these foods, whether geographic or economic such as income. Keywords: Processed food,; Diet; Brazil; Food consumption; Diet surveys
... However, the discrepancy could also be due to differences in the tools used to measure UPF intake. Although this study used the ASA24, previous estimates have used in-person interviews, which was not feasible for this project [1]. Although the ASA24 provides a rich, item-by-item measure of food intake, which is more rigorous than food frequency questionnaires, the current study's system for classifying foods as UPFs was certainly imperfect. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Ultra‐processed foods (UPFs) are harmful to health but ubiquitous in the modern food environment, comprising almost 60% of the average American diet. This study assessed the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a novel behavioral intervention designed to reduce UPF intake. Methods Fourteen adults participated in an 8‐week pilot intervention, which consisted of weekly group sessions, individual meal planning sessions, and financial support. Dietary intake was assessed using three Automated Self‐Administered 24‐h Dietary Recalls (ASA24) at both baseline and post‐treatment. Results The intervention was highly feasible and acceptable. Qualitative data demonstrated that participants were enthusiastic about the benefits of reducing UPF intake and found the intervention highly valuable. Participants reduced average daily calories from UPF by 48.9%, number of UPFs consumed by almost half, total daily calorie intake by 612 calories/day, sodium consumption by 37% and sugar consumption by 50%. There were no significant changes in fruit or vegetable intake. Participants lost an average of 3.5 kg (SD = 3.0 kg). Conclusion This pilot data suggests that behavioral interventions to reduce UPF intake will be well‐received and are capable of success despite the barriers of the United States food environment. Future research should prioritize behavioral interventions targeting UPF consumption alongside policy changes.
Article
Full-text available
(1) Background: The consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) constitutes a public health problem given their high availability and easy accessibility among children and young people and their influence on the development of non-communicable diseases in the long term. In this context, culture and religion may be modulating factors for the consumption of processed food. The aim of this study is to assess the consumption of UPFs in Spanish schoolchildren living in Melilla (North Africa), together with the possible impact of religion on this. (2) Methods: A cross-sectional study of 590 Christian and Muslim schoolchildren aged 15–17 years was conducted. The NOVA food classification was used to identify UPFs. Associations between religion and daily consumption were identified using risk analysis (Odds Ratio). (3) Results: Muslim schoolchildren had a higher consumption of industrial juices [OR = 2.700, 95%CI = 1.830–4.037], milkshakes [OR = 2.925, 95% = 1.850–4.748], industrial pastries [OR = 2.217, 95% = 1.440–3.510], sweets [OR = 2.197, 95%CI = 1.437–3.541], chocolates [OR = 2.272, 95%CI = 1.482–3.606] and savory snacks [OR = 3.431, 95%CI = 1.844–6.579] compared to that observed among Christians. (4) Conclusions: Both Muslim and Christian schoolchildren had a high consumption of UPFs. Regarding the potential impact of religion on the consumption of UPF, we observed that Muslim schoolchildren consumed three to four times more UPF than Christian schoolchildren. These results show a shift away from a healthy eating pattern, especially among Muslim schoolchildren. Thus, it is necessary to implement nutritional education strategies in order to understand and control the consumption of UPF in adolescents, thereby reducing the occurrence of non-communicable diseases in the long term.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: To evaluate the heterogeneity in the consumption of fresh or minimally processed foods (FMPF) and ultra-processed foods (UPF) in the Brazilian population ≥10 years of age. Methods: Cross-sectional study that used data from the food consumption and resident module from the 2017–2018 edition of the Family Budget Survey. Variables relating to sex, region of residence, household status and per capita family income in minimum wages were used. The outcomes were dietary participation in percentage of FMPF and UPF. Heterogeneity was assessed using random effects produced by linear mixed-effects models. Results: Thirty-two random effects were obtained for the consumption of FMPF and 34 for UPF. Living in the urban area of the South and Southeast regions, as well as having a higher income were driving factors in the consumption of UPF and reducing the consumption of FMPF. Living in a rural area and having low income were mainly reducing factors in the consumption of UPF and driving factors in the consumption of FMPF. Conclusions: The consumption of UPF and FMPF was determined by the set of factors that represented easy access to these foods, whether geographic or economic such as income. Keywords: Processed food,; Diet; Brazil; Food consumption; Diet surveys
Article
Full-text available
Objective To identify the energy contributions of NOVA food groups in the Mexican diet and the associations between individual sociodemographic characteristics and the energy contribution of ultra-processed foods (UPF). Design We classified foods and beverages reported in a 24 h recall according to the NOVA food framework into: (i) unprocessed or minimally processed foods; (ii) processed culinary ingredients; (iii) processed foods; and (iv) UPF. We estimated the energy contribution of each food group and ran a multiple linear regression to identify the associations between sociodemographic characteristics and UPF energy contribution. Setting Mexican National Health and Nutrition Survey 2012. Subjects Individuals ≥1 years old ( n 10 087). Results Unprocessed or minimally processed foods had the highest dietary energy contribution (54·0 % of energy), followed by UPF (29·8 %), processed culinary ingredients (10·2 %) and processed foods (6·0 %). The energy contribution of UPF was higher in: pre-school-aged children v . other age groups (3·8 to 12·5 percentage points difference (pp)); urban areas v . rural (5·6 pp); the Central and North regions v . the South (2·7 and 8·4 pp, respectively); medium and high socio-economic status v . low (4·5 pp, in both); and with higher head of household educational level v . without education (3·4 to 7·8 pp). Conclusions In 2012, about 30 % of energy in the Mexican diet came from UPF. Our results showed that younger ages, urbanization, living in the North region, high socio-economic status and high head of household educational level are sociodemographic factors related to higher consumption of UPF in Mexico.
Article
Full-text available
This paper evaluates variation in food prices within and between neighborhoods to improve our understanding of access to healthy foods in urbanized areas and potential economic incentives and barriers to consuming a higher-quality diet. Prices of a selection of healthier foods (dairy, fruit juice, and frozen vegetables) and unhealthy foods (soda, sweets, and salty snacks) were obtained from 1953 supermarkets across the USA during 2009-2012 and were linked to census block group socio-demographics. Analyses evaluated associations between neighborhood SES and proportion Black/Hispanic and the prices of healthier and unhealthy foods, and the relative price of healthier foods compared with unhealthy foods (healthy-to-unhealthy price ratio). Linear hierarchical regression models were used to explore geospatial variation and adjust for confounders. Overall, the price of healthier foods was nearly twice as high as the price of unhealthy foods (0.590vs0.590 vs 0.298 per serving; healthy-to-unhealthy price ratio of 1.99). This trend was consistent across all neighborhood characteristics. After adjusting for covariates, no association was found between food prices (healthy, unhealthy, or the healthy-to-unhealthy ratio) and neighborhood SES. Similarly, there was no association between the proportion Black/Hispanic and healthier food price, a very small positive association with unhealthy price, and a modest negative association with the healthy-to-unhealthy ratio. No major differences were seen in food prices across levels of neighborhood SES and proportion Black/Hispanic; however, the price of healthier food was twice as expensive as unhealthy food per serving on average.
Article
Full-text available
Objective To assess the consumption of ultra-processed foods and analyse its association with the content of added sugars in the Chilean diet. Design Cross-sectional study of national dietary data obtained through 24 h recalls and classified into food groups according to the extent and purpose of food processing (NOVA classification). Setting Chile. Subjects A probabilistic sample of 4920 individuals (aged 2 years or above) studied in 2010 by a national dietary survey (Encuesta Nacional de Consumo Alimentario). Results Ultra-processed foods represented 28·6 ( se 0·5) % of total energy intake and 58·6 ( se 0·9) % of added sugars intake. The mean percentage of energy from added sugars increased from 7·7 ( se 0·3) to 19·7 ( se 0·5) % across quintiles of the dietary share of ultra-processed foods. After adjusting for several potential sociodemographic confounders, a 5 percentage point increase in the dietary share of ultra-processed foods determined a 1 percentage point increase in the dietary content of added sugars. Individuals in the highest quintile were three times more likely (OR=2·9; 95 % CI 2·4, 3·4) to exceed the 10 % upper limit for added sugars recommended by the WHO compared with those in the lowest quintile, after adjusting for sociodemographic variables. This association was strongest among individuals aged 2–19 years (OR=3·9; 95 % CI 2·7, 5·9). Conclusions In Chile, ultra-processed foods are important contributors to total energy intake and to the consumption of added sugars. Actions aimed at limiting consumption of ultra-processed foods are being implemented as effective ways to achieve WHO dietary recommendations to limit added sugars and processed foods, especially for children and adolescents.
Article
Full-text available
Given evident multiple threats to food systems and supplies, food security, human health and welfare, the living and physical world and the biosphere, the years 2016–2025 are now designated by the UN as the Decade of Nutrition, in support of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. For these initiatives to succeed, it is necessary to know which foods contribute to health and well-being, and which are unhealthy. The present commentary outlines the NOVA system of food classification based on the nature, extent and purpose of food processing. Evidence that NOVA effectively addresses the quality of diets and their impact on all forms of malnutrition, and also the sustainability of food systems, has now accumulated in a number of countries, as shown here. A singular feature of NOVA is its identification of ultra-processed food and drink products. These are not modified foods, but formulations mostly of cheap industrial sources of dietary energy and nutrients plus additives, using a series of processes (hence ‘ultra-processed’). All together, they are energy-dense, high in unhealthy types of fat, refined starches, free sugars and salt, and poor sources of protein, dietary fibre and micronutrients. Ultra-processed products are made to be hyper-palatable and attractive, with long shelf-life, and able to be consumed anywhere, any time. Their formulation, presentation and marketing often promote overconsumption. Studies based on NOVA show that ultra-processed products now dominate the food supplies of various high-income countries and are increasingly pervasive in lower middle- and upper-middle-income countries. The evidence so far shows that displacement of minimally processed foods and freshly prepared dishes and meals by ultra-processed products is associated with unhealthy dietary nutrient profiles and several diet-related non-communicable diseases. Ultra-processed products are also troublesome from social, cultural, economic, political and environmental points of view. We conclude that the ever-increasing production and consumption of these products is a world crisis, to be confronted, checked and reversed as part of the work of the UN Sustainable Development Goals and its Decade of Nutrition. (NOVA, Ultra-processing)
Article
Full-text available
Background Recent population dietary studies indicate that diets rich in ultra-processed foods, increasingly frequent worldwide, are grossly nutritionally unbalanced, suggesting that the dietary contribution of these foods largely determines the overall nutritional quality of contemporaneous diets. Yet, these studies have focused on individual nutrients (one at a time) rather than the overall nutritional quality of the diets. Here we investigate the relationship between the energy contribution of ultra-processed foods in the US diet and its content of critical nutrients, individually and overall. Methods We evaluated dietary intakes of 9,317 participants from 2009 to 2010 NHANES aged 1+ years. Food items were classified into unprocessed or minimally processed foods, processed culinary ingredients, processed foods, and ultra-processed foods. First, we examined the average dietary content of macronutrients, micronutrients, and fiber across quintiles of the energy contribution of ultra-processed foods. Then, we used Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to identify a nutrient-balanced dietary pattern to enable the assessment of the overall nutritional quality of the diet. Linear regression was used to explore the association between the dietary share of ultra-processed foods and the balanced-pattern PCA factor score. The scores were thereafter categorized into tertiles, and their distribution was examined across ultra-processed food quintiles. All models incorporated survey sample weights and were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, family income, and educational attainment. ResultsThe average content of protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, D, and E, zinc, potassium, phosphorus, magnesium, and calcium in the US diet decreased significantly across quintiles of the energy contribution of ultra-processed foods, while carbohydrate, added sugar, and saturated fat contents increased. An inverse dose–response association was found between ultra-processed food quintiles and overall dietary quality measured through a nutrient-balanced-pattern PCA-derived factor score characterized by being richer in fiber, potassium, magnesium and vitamin C, and having less saturated fat and added sugars. Conclusions This study suggests that decreasing the dietary share of ultra-processed foods is a rational and effective way to improve the nutritional quality of US diets.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Ultraprocessed food consumption has increased in the past decade. Evidence suggests a positive association between ultraprocessed food consumption and the incidence of overweight and obesity. However, few prospective studies to our knowledge have investigated this potential relation in adults. Objective: We evaluated the association between ultraprocessed food consumption and the risk of overweight and obesity in a prospective Spanish cohort, the SUN (University of Navarra Follow-Up) study. Design: We included 8451 middle-aged Spanish university graduates who were initially not overweight or obese and followed up for a median of 8.9 y. The consumption of ultraprocessed foods (defined as food and drink products ready to eat, drink, or heat and made predominantly or entirely from processed items extracted or refined from whole foods or synthesized in the laboratory) was assessed with the use of a validated semiquantitative 136-item food-frequency questionnaire. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted HRs and 95% CIs for incident overweight and obesity. Results: A total of 1939 incident cases of overweight and obesity were identified during follow-up. After adjustment for potential confounders, participants in the highest quartile of ultraprocessed food consumption were at a higher risk of developing overweight or obesity (adjusted HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.10, 1.45; P-trend = 0.001) than those in the lowest quartile of consumption. Conclusions: Ultraprocessed food consumption was associated with a higher risk of overweight and obesity in a prospective cohort of Spanish middle-aged adult university graduates. Further longitudinal studies are needed to confirm our results. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02669602.
Article
Full-text available
Abstract BACKGROUND: Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), fruit juice, and milk are components of diet of major public health interest. To-date, assessment of their global distributions and health impacts has been limited by insufficient comparable and reliable data by country, age, and sex. OBJECTIVE: To quantify global, regional, and national levels of SSB, fruit juice, and milk intake by age and sex in adults over age 20 in 2010. METHODS: We identified, obtained, and assessed data on intakes of these beverages in adults, by age and sex, from 193 nationally- or subnationally-representative diet surveys worldwide, representing over half the world's population. We also extracted data relevant to milk, fruit juice, and SSB availability for 187 countries from annual food balance information collected by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization. We developed a hierarchical Bayesian model to account for measurement incomparability, study representativeness, and sampling and modeling uncertainty, and to combine and harmonize nationally representative dietary survey data and food availability data. RESULTS: In 2010, global average intakes were 0.58 (95%UI: 0.37, 0.89) 8 oz servings/day for SSBs, 0.16 (0.10, 0.26) for fruit juice, and 0.57 (0.39, 0.83) for milk. There was significant heterogeneity in consumption of each beverage by region and age. Intakes of SSB were highest in the Caribbean (1.9 servings/day; 1.2, 3.0); fruit juice consumption was highest in Australia and New Zealand (0.66; 0.35, 1.13); and milk intake was highest in Central Latin America and parts of Europe (1.06; 0.68, 1.59). Intakes of all three beverages were lowest in East Asia and Oceania. Globally and within regions, SSB consumption was highest in younger adults; fruit juice consumption showed little relation with age; and milk intakes were highest in older adults. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis highlights the enormous spectrum of beverage intakes worldwide, by country, age, and sex. These data are valuable for highlighting gaps in dietary surveillance, determining the impacts of these beverages on global health, and targeting dietary policy.
Article
Objective Concerns have been raised about the potential health impact of ultra-processed foods (UPF) in the diet. Our objective was to investigate the contribution of UPF in the diet in a large French population and its association with sociodemographic factors and dietary patterns. Design Cross-sectional analysis of dietary data from 74 470 participants in the web-based NutriNet-Santé cohort. UPF were identified in repeated 24 h records and the proportion (in weight) of UPF in the total diet (UPFp) was computed for each participant. Associations of sociodemographic characteristics and UPFp in quartiles were assessed using multivariate multinomial logistic regression. Food group consumption and nutrient intakes across quartiles of UPFp were estimated using linear regression adjusted for sociodemographic factors and energy intake. Setting France. Results UPF contributed 18·4 % of the foods consumed in weight and 35·9 % of total energy intake. Higher UPFp consumption was independently associated with male gender, younger age, lower education, smoking, and overweight and obesity (all P <0·0001). Participants in the highest UPFp quartile consumed lower amounts of fruit and vegetables (difference between quartile 4 and quartile 1 of UPFp, Δ=−180·3 g/d) and higher amounts of sweet products (Δ=68·5 g/d) and soft drinks (Δ=98·6 g/d; all P <0·0001). They had higher intakes of energy (Δ=610 kJ/d (145·7 kcal/d)) and added sugar (Δ=17·1 g/d), and lower intakes of fibre (Δ=−4·04 g/d), β-carotene (Δ=−1019·6 μg/d) and Ca (Δ=−87·8 mg/d; all P <0·0001). Conclusions UPF represent an important part of the diet in adults from the French general population and are associated with unbalanced nutritional intakes.
Article
Health follows a socioeconomic status (SES) gradient in developed countries with disease prevalence falling as SES rises. This pattern is partially attributed to differences in nutritional intake, with the poor eating the least healthy diets. This paper examines whether there is an SES gradient in one specific aspect of nutrition: fast-food consumption. Fast food is generally high in calories and low in nutrients. We use data from the 2008, 2010, and 2012 waves of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY79) to test whether adult fast-food consumption in the United States falls as monetary resources rise (n = 8,136). This research uses more recent data than previous fast-food studies and includes a comprehensive measure of wealth in addition to income to measure SES.
Article
This study describes food consumption patterns in Canada according to the types of food processing using the Nova classification and investigates the association between consumption of ultra-processed foods and the nutrient profile of the diet. Dietary intakes of 33,694 individuals from the 2004 Canadian Community Health Survey aged 2 years and above were analyzed. Food and drinks were classified using Nova into unprocessed or minimally processed foods, processed culinary ingredients, processed foods and ultra-processed foods. Average consumption (total daily energy intake) and relative consumption (% of total energy intake) provided by each of the food groups were calculated. Consumption of ultra-processed foods according to sex, age, education, residential location and relative family revenue was assessed. Mean nutrient content of ultra-processed foods and non-ultra-processed foods were compared, and the average nutrient content of the overall diet across quintiles of dietary share of ultra-processed foods was measured. In 2004, 48% of calories consumed by Canadians came from ultra-processed foods. Consumption of such foods was high amongst all socioeconomic groups, and particularly in children and adolescents. As a group, ultra-processed foods were grossly nutritionally inferior to non-ultra-processed foods. After adjusting for covariates, a significant and positive relationship was found between the dietary share of ultra-processed foods and the content in carbohydrates, free sugars, total and saturated fats and energy density, while an inverse relationship was observed with the dietary content in protein, fiber, vitamins A, C, D, B6 and B12, niacin, thiamine, riboflavin, as well as zinc, iron, magnesium, calcium, phosphorus and potassium. Lowering the dietary share of ultra-processed foods and raising consumption of hand-made meals from unprocessed or minimally processed foods would substantially improve the diet quality of Canadian.