Content uploaded by Mavis Machirori
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Mavis Machirori on Mar 05, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
Content uploaded by Mavis Machirori
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Mavis Machirori on Mar 05, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
Machirori et al., Cogent Medicine (2018),
5: 1442636
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2018.1442636
ONCOLOGY | RESEARCH ARTICLE
Study of the relationship between Black men,
culture and prostate cancer beliefs
Mavis Machirori
1
*, Christine Patch
1
and Alison Metcalfe
1
Abstract:Prostate cancer is the leading cancer for men worldwide, with increas-
ing incidence in Sub-Saharan Africa. In the UK and USA, Black men of dierent
backgrounds are at higher risk of developing prostate cancer but continue to have
little involvement with related health services. Lack of knowledge and culture have
been implicated as reasons for this but culture in Black ethnic groups has not been
very well explored. This scoping study asks how ethnicity, as represented by culture,
interacts with Black men’s beliefs around prostate cancer. The objective is to under-
stand the meaning of prostate cancer and the role of culture in Black men’s beliefs
about the disease. Using a symbolic interactionist approach to explore meaning-
making in Black men around culture and prostate cancer reveals varied ways in
which culture aects interaction with health services. A thematic analysis of 25
studies included in the final scoping study shows that there are three main themes
under which cultural issues can be examined: personal, societal and structural. The
study reveals that knowledge is contextual and that personal and societal beliefs
and structural factors intertwine to create a system that can preclude Black men
from taking part in prostate cancer-related health practices, and discusses some of
the ways in which these can be addressed.
Subjects: Social Sciences; Health and Social Care; Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health
Keywords: ethnicity; culture; beliefs; Black men; minority; Black and Minority Ethnic (BME)
prostate cancer
*Corresponding author: Mavis Machirori,
Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing,
Midwifery, Palliative Care, King’s College
London, 1.32 James Clerk Maxwell
Building, 57 Waterloo Road, London SE1
8WA, UK
E-mail: mavis.machirori@kcl.ac.uk
Reviewing editor:
Noy Kay, Indiana University
Bloomington, USA
Additional information is available at
the end of the article
ABOUT THE AUTHORS
The authors include a PhD student examining
how knowledge of cancer genetics is constructed
by patients from ethnic minorities, working as
part of a team whose research interests focus on
family health and genetic risk communication.
The research team undertake funded projects to
understand what aects patients understanding
of genetic risk and how best to facilitate the
communication and sharing of genetic risk
information, leading to improved care and service
provision. The work includes a focus on improving
health outcomes and reducing inequalities in
treatments and service use.
PUBLIC INTEREST STATEMENT
Black men have some of the highest risk of
developing prostate cancer compared to men from
other ethnic groups. Black men make little use
of health services related to prostate health and
may end up being diagnosed late or with more
severe forms of prostate cancer. Reasons such as
culture and lack of knowledge have been given as
influencing the behaviours of Black men towards
cancer service use. This review questions what
culture is and how it influences what men know of
prostate cancer and as well as what they believe
about prostate cancer. Cultural influences and
prostate cancer beliefs are multi-level and centre
on personal, social and wider structural factors.
Knowing how these factors interact helps to create
ways to encourage more interaction with prostate
cancer services and ensure men are diagnosed
earlier and have better health outcomes than they
currently do.
Received: 06 October 2017
Accepted: 15 February 2018
© 2018 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons
Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
Page 1 of 13
Page 2 of 13
Machirori et al., Cogent Medicine (2018),
5: 1442636
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2018.1442636
1. Background
The burden of cancer and the cost of survival and living with chronic disease have increased in the last
two decades, with prostate cancer as the most common cancer among men (Global Burden of Disease
Cancer Collaboration, 2017). Discrepancies and inequalities in access to health systems and knowl-
edge across the world, contribute to varying levels of health outcomes and survival among popula-
tions (Adeloye et al., 2016; Thakare & Chinegwundoh, 2015). Compared with Caucasian men, Black
men are faced with an unequal disease burden—experiencing more aggressive prostate cancer with
earlier onset (Aizer et al., 2014; Shenoy, Packianathan, Chen, & Vijayakumar, 2016; Thompson, 2013).
In the UK alone, men from Black ethnic backgrounds are up to 2–3 times more likely to be diag-
nosed with prostate cancer—a figure much higher than the national average (Jones & Chinegwundoh,
2014; Prostate Cancer UK, 2016). Ongoing research shows that despite these figures, men from Black
backgrounds do not readily access health services in relation to concerns about prostate cancer
(Thompson, 2013). Generally, inequalities in incidence and mortality have sometimes been linked to
dierences in socio-economic status, where those in lower socio-economic groups face poorer relat-
ed health outcomes than those in higher socio-economic groups in some cases than those in higher
economic groups for instance (Singh & Jemal, 2017; Thakare & Chinegwundoh, 2015; Thompson,
2013). Globally, lack of knowledge, fear, and cultural beliefs have been implicated in the past as con-
tributing to men’s screening behaviours. Cultural beliefs have been increasingly attached to studies
of ethnicity without much explication of what they are or how they come to be held. A search of the
literature suggested that many of the studies on the topic focussed mainly on assessment of knowl-
edge around prostate cancer, with “culture” not specifically defined. Literature is also mostly concen-
trated on the UK and USA. This scoping study (Arksey & O’Malley, 2005; Daudt, van Mossel, & Scott,
2013; Levac, Colquhoun, & O’Brien, 2010) gathers wide-reaching research over the last decade and
explores the meaning of prostate cancer in Black men, aiming to unravel the contemporary meaning
of culture and what contribution it currently plays in prostate cancer beliefs.
2. Methods
This scoping study is based on methodological steps described in Arksey and O’Malley’s (2005)
framework, with attendance to issues raised by Levac et al. (2010), such as conducting a consulta-
tion phase. However, following Daudt et al. (2013), who suggest flexibility in how this can be done,
the consultation was conducted informally both before and towards the latter stages of the review.
Those consulted included individuals with extensive work in prostate cancer programmes for Black
men; as well as researchers who have conducted work recruiting Black men for community health
programmes. Their insights into why men did not engage in prostate cancer-related services are
reflected in some of the themes discussed below. A symbolic interactionist approach (Blumer, 1986)
towards understanding men’s cultural beliefs was taken which enabled exploration of their individ-
ual and group creation of the meaning of prostate cancer. Symbolic interaction suggests that indi-
viduals create their social worlds and direct meaning towards objects based on their shared and
personal knowledge acquired through interaction with said object and other people.
A scoping review is undertaken to rapidly map the key concepts underpinning the area of investi-
gation and to provide an overview of the studies undertaken in a complex area where there has been
little research previously (Arksey & O’Malley, 2005; Daudt et al., 2013; Levac et al., 2010). To identify
relevant studies, a database search was carried out over four weeks between January and February
2017, covering a period from January 2007 until February 2017. Seven main databases were identi-
fied: Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL, BNI, OVID, OVIDSp (Embase, Ovid Medline, Global
Health, HMIC, Journals@Ovid, PsycINFO and Social Policy and Practice), King’s Fund Library and
Opengrey. Weekly updates were set up to run until the second week of March to identify any new
articles within the search time-frame. In line with our chosen approach and to obtain a broad over-
view of the relationships under study, we applied broad inclusion and exclusion, starting widely and
becoming more refined according to the search results and how closely studies aligned with our
research focus. Grey literature and studies from countries outside the UK and USA were included to
capture the widest possible cultural meanings and influences towards prostate cancer. Key word
Page 3 of 13
Machirori et al., Cogent Medicine (2018),
5: 1442636
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2018.1442636
searching in databases, with truncations or phrases as appropriate, grey literature and free hand
searching of journals, reference lists and Google and Google Scholar, identified 3478 articles in total.
Duplicate studies identified by title and abstract were removed from the review.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria decided by the research team were used to identify relevant studies.
Studies were included if they met the following criteria: empirical studies focusing on men, Black ethnic-
ity and prostate cancer. Studies were excluded if they focused on mental health, quality of life, knowl-
edge evaluation, screening behaviours only as well as surgery, biologic and tumor-related concerns.
After applying exclusions, a full-text reading was conducted of the remaining 195 articles on
which further exclusions were made based on studies addressing women’s views only, risk percep-
tions, trend data and intervention studies assessing education and service use, leaving 67 remaining
studies. The final level of review ascertained information that answered the review question and led
to the removal of articles that were psychosocial in nature, were quotations or results not attribut-
able to ethnicity or men, as well as studies undertaken about health provider views. Any articles not
in English and for which full-text could not be obtained, including conference proceedings and ab-
stracts only were not included. Overall studies that only assessed knowledge, education and risk
levels without giving a cultural interpretation of why this might be the case were not included.
Additionally, studies that only assessed knowledge, education and risk levels without giving a cul-
tural interpretation of why this might the case were not included in the final review. Both qualitative
and quantitative studies were included but only if they provided information about the cultural com-
ponents and beliefs by Black men in relation to prostate cancer.
The final remaining 25 articles were representative of the diverse heritage of Black men, with stud-
ies based and representing men from the UK, USA, Barbados, Nigeria, Trinidad and Tobago, Uganda
and Zimbabwe. The ethnicities were recorded in various ways including African-American, Black,
Caribbean, Afro-Caribbean and Nigerian with participants either migrants or born in the countries in
which research was conducted. Additionally, studies included study participants with no history of
disease to a mixed personal and family history of prostate cancer. Finally, reported ages ranged
from 15 to 100 years old.
Quality assessments are a debated issue in qualitative research and reporting (Hannes, 2011) and
are an accepted method in systematic reviews. However, in this study, quality of the studies were
not assessed (Levac et al., 2010) as the aim was to understand an immeasurable concept of men’s
meanings and beliefs which would be better answered by an inclusive approach to the question than
by excluding studies based on quality criteria (Arksey & O’Malley, 2005). Therefore, all 25 studies
were included to ensure the depth and the breadth of contemporary studies was captured, with any
potential problems with a study carefully considered in the reporting of the findings.
To collate the results, a data extraction sheet was created and used to keep a first level record,
listing all information that related to what participants spoke of in relation to their culture and pros-
tate cancer. Using a thematic analysis approach (Braun & Clarke, 2006) the main themes emerging
from the studies were identified, and the findings summarised on the data extraction sheet before
grouping the shared sub-themes into over-arching themes that were shared across the studies.
These overarching themes were subsequently explored in depth using a series of questions related
to the focus of the review using a symbolic interactionist approach (Blumer, 1986) and answering
the question, “what is this data relating to?”. The findings were grouped depending on whether the
men attributed the beliefs to themselves or to a wider general community, that is from individual
meaning-making, a group process or from an externally noted source. This approach resulted in the
creation of three linked thematic labels into which topics were grouped. Comparisons were made
across the studies to identify themes that were both complementary and contrasting to avoid gen-
eralising across participants. The emergent cultural themes were self-defined and collated mostly
from the qualitative work, which iteratively informed how the quantitative studies were read. As the
themes emerged, the findings were discussed within the research team, a process which
Page 4 of 13
Machirori et al., Cogent Medicine (2018),
5: 1442636
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2018.1442636
encouraged a reflexive approach and tested assumptions of the person (MM) undertaking the data
extraction in how they identified and created the emergent themes. Results are reported in a
descriptive manner and discussed below.
3. Results
Overall, participants mainly held beliefs that resulted from individual and group understanding of
prostate cancer. The group understanding covered influences towards social relationships, expecta-
tions of responsibilities, as well as socially acceptable behaviours which in turn influenced some in-
dividual beliefs the men held. In addition, the men identified external factors that at times dictated
their engagement in prostate health-related practices. These were factors that the men sometimes
were not able to change, and emerged from input from health professionals, community advisers
and government agencies to name a few. The main discourses were around health and illness be-
liefs and practices, and the issues that aected these. The final thematic analysis revealed that
three main themes—personal, social and structural—were factors that contributed to men’s beliefs
around prostate cancer, each exerting various influences at a time (Figure 1). The factors intertwined
and contributed to some cultural beliefs and behaviours.
Although there are three distinct themes, personal and social themes are more closely intertwined
in how they influence each other while the structural factors create a more external view. In the fol-
lowing discussion, the personal and the social factors are grouped together to show how the cultural
beliefs are closely tied together. This does not negate the fact that individuals will sometimes at-
tempt to have agency over their own health and the beliefs they hold might not align with the wider
social beliefs of those around them. The attempt at making individual decisions is nuanced but is an
important distinction as it suggests that while there might be similarities between Black men, not all
Black men will behave the same way. Finally, the men, in their everyday lives, are likely to experience
these factors to varying degrees and so these factors should not be looked at as independent fac-
tors, rather as contributing to the culture-informed cancer beliefs, where changing various aspects
of the factors might aect the beliefs Black men hold.
3.1. Personal and social factors
The beliefs that Black men hold emerge from a mix of individual meaning-making (personal factors)
and interaction with others around them (social factors). The two themes are both complementary
and at times conflicting since the personal views that men held could be strengthened by the so-
cially accepted views. In other times, those individual views could result in conflict if the social view
contrasted and challenged the wider social view that those around them held. Where personal views
clash with wider social views, men dier in their health behaviours, justifying them by personal ex-
perience or re-evaluating certain aspects of their lives. Social factors form the collectively held
Figure 1. Culture-informed
prostate cancer beliefs of Black
men.
Note: *Factors in the same
colour are inter-related.
Structural factors
medical
relationships and
access to
information
health focus,
medical
insurance and
treatment costs
Social factors*
language
health practices
and illness beliefs
prostate cancer
practices
Personal factors*
health practices
prostate cancer
disease
Page 5 of 13
Machirori et al., Cogent Medicine (2018),
5: 1442636
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2018.1442636
beliefs around prostate cancer and what it means to Black men but are themselves based on an in-
dividual understanding of what it is to be a Black man. The individual perception or enactment of
being a Black man then influences and creates the personal factors that create personal beliefs to-
wards prostate cancer. It is, therefore, a subtle way in which the individual creates personal beliefs
out of personal factors and social factors. Collective beliefs arise out of interaction, although these
are constantly negotiated as everyone balances theirs and others’ belief systems. Sub-factors like
language and health practices define the discourse on prostate cancer and contribute to its overall
cultural meanings.
3.1.1. Language
Meaning-making relies on language and there appears to be a consensus that certain medical terms
such as prostate and cancer are heavily implicated with negative connotations. To start, perceptions
of a lack of shared language result in reduced interaction with health systems (Sanchez, Bowen,
Hart, & Spigner, 2007) as taboos around its open discussion lead to use of euphemisms or other ways
to describe prostate cancer. Where no local translations or everyday equivalents exist, discussion of
prostate health becomes dicult as people have no words of their own comfort to use (Olapade-
Olaopa et al., 2014). In some studies, in African and Caribbean communities, descriptors reference
prostate cancer by its eects, for example by creating a name relating to issues with urinary flow
(Nanton & Dale, 2011; Olapade-Olaopa et al., 2014). In another study (Moyo, 2017), cancer is de-
scribed as an internal disease that is not easy to spot, with reference made to a plant being de-
stroyed from the inside by a well-known local rodent. Additionally, because of the internal position
of the prostate, referencing the aected organ becomes dicult (Moyo, 2017). Language, therefore,
plays a crucial role in creating prostate cancer beliefs in these men, as it makes prostate cancer both
invisible and mysterious.
3.1.2. Inter-related factors: Health practices and illness beliefs
Besides language, various other practices are important in understanding cultural beliefs in Black
men.
Health practices, illness beliefs and behaviours are influenced by Black men’s ideas about being
macho or manly. Socially, Black men are said to take pride in the ability to have and maintain a good
amount of health without needing to consult a health care practitioner (Allen et al., 2007) such that
being ill threatens what it means to be a man (Harvey & Alston, 2011; Sanchez et al., 2007). These
social views mean care-seeking or screening behaviours are then regarded as feminine and not
something macho men do (Akpuaka, Clarke-Tasker, Nichols-English, Daniel, & Akpuaka, 2013;
Mulugeta, 2014; Ng et al., 2013; Ocho & Green, 2013). The personal worries about one’s health
(Nakandi et al., 2013) or a diagnosis of prostate cancer (Wray et al., 2009) provide a stronger reason
to change behaviours than do social views.
Engaging in asymptomatic health practices is not considered the norm (Hughes et al., 2007; Ng et
al., 2013; Sanchez et al., 2007) especially when coupled with a need to maintain perception of being
super men who overcome malaise (Friedman, Corwin, Dominick, & Rose, 2009; Harvey & Alston,
2011). These views and behaviours are reported as learned from parents (Oliver, 2007; Wray et al.,
2009; Seymour-Smith et al., 2016), yet other suggestions are that views against asymptomatic
health practices are because Black men do not like being told what to do (Owens, Jackson, Thomas,
Friedman, & Hebert, 2015; Sanchez et al., 2007). However, if personal views towards prostate cancer
dier from the social views, conflict arises. Men must balance concerns about their health against
attempts to maintain a social meaning of being manly. Deferring to the social view stops them seek-
ing help, expressing concern or showing any emotion towards prostate cancer concerns (Nanton &
Dale, 2011).
One factor underpinning and influencing beliefs was the cultural practice about not speaking back
to those in authority, which hampered raising concerns or discussions about prostate cancer if initial
consultations appeared to dismiss concerns (Allen et al., 2007). This was noted mostly in African
Page 6 of 13
Machirori et al., Cogent Medicine (2018),
5: 1442636
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2018.1442636
American and Caribbean men. Interactions with health professionals are lessened even further if
men believe that health is a private matter which stops them discussing prostate health altogether
(Ng et al., 2013; Oliver, 2007). These cultural views are compounded if men are faced with female
health practitioners as their discomfort increases (Anderson, Marshall-Lucette, & Webb 2013). There
was an additional associated societal fear of medical institutions as they were regarded as places of
death and disease (Allen et al., 2007; Hughes et al., 2007).
Generally, the perceptions of who was aected by disease were divergent. Socially, men did not
agree on their susceptibility, with some convinced prostate cancer was a Black man’s disease (Owens
et al., 2015), and others believing that it was more prevalent in Caucasian men (Atulomah,
Olanrewaju, Amosu, & Adedeji, 2010). Men however, reportedly held the view that prostate cancer
was something they could control by regulating diet and working hard (Friedman et al., 2009; Hughes
et al., 2007). Akpuaka et al. (2013) and Sanchez et al. (2007) on the other hand suggest that several
Black men held the belief that those who thought about or screened for disease ended up being di-
agnosed with it. While some men personally believed prostate cancer and death were part of ageing
and the life process, therefore not for younger men to worry about (Anderson et al., 2013; Atulomah
et al., 2010; Bache et al., 2012; Nakandi et al., 2013; Nanton & Dale, 2011; Owens et al., 2015), there
remained a societal underlying fear of prostate cancer and related death (Cobran, Hall, & Aiken,
2017).
A more personal belief saw prostate cancer as a punishment from God (Bache, Bhui, Dein, &
Korszun, 2012), with religion necessary to enable one to cope with a diagnosis (Nanton & Dale,
2011). Faith reversed the collective and personal macho discourse and led Black men to take care of
their health as they saw it as their responsibility to be role models for their children and community
(Maliski, Connor, Williams, & Litwin, 2010; Maliski, Rivera, Connor, Lopez, & Litwin, 2008) and to keep
the family intact and undisrupted by disease, especially if financial resources were inadequate
(Friedman et al., 2009; Ng et al., 2013). Personal faith was reason to engage with health profession-
als to seek treatment thereby strengthening both faith in God and in medicine (Allen et al., 2007;
Maliski et al., 2010).
Health practices and illness beliefs around prostate cancer also encompassed ideas related to
sexual practices, religion and responsibility. The discussions provided a part insight into the health
and social environments in the participants’ countries which in turn influenced the views the men
held towards prostate cancer. One view was the belief that prostate cancer resulted from sex-relat-
ed practices that were generally frowned upon in these dierent communities. Some studies’ partici-
pants, particularly of African backgrounds (more than African American or Caribbean), thought
prostate cancer was a sexually transmitted disease (Atulomah et al., 2010). Some thought engaging
in too much sex with women of loose morals led to an accumulation of dirt which they linked to
prostate cancer (Friedman et al., 2009). While societal moral beliefs appeared to be that engaging in
too much sex led to prostate cancer, aecting younger men more as they tended to be more sexu-
ally prolific (Moyo, 2017; Nakandi et al., 2013; Olapade-Olaopa et al., 2014), individual beliefs held by
some men diered. Personal beliefs instead were that not having enough sex would lead to a build-
up of sperm which eventually led to prostate cancer disease (Friedman et al., 2009).
For those who came from areas where the HIV/AIDS discourse was more prevalent, sexual moral-
ity was largely linked to protection from disease. This put prostate cancer in a less severe light that
men set aside and were not necessarily interested in (Nakandi et al., 2013), confessing to being more
afraid of HIV/AIDS than they were of prostate cancer. Apart from the health and illness beliefs and
practices, additional centred on views towards specific practices around the disease.
3.1.3. Prostate cancer disease and practices
Like ideas in health practices, some men believed ignorance towards prostate cancer caused un-
necessary worry and was protective from disease (Atulomah et al., 2010; Friedman et al., 2009). This
enabled men to avoid being identified or labelled as “sick”—identities that impacted on their
Page 7 of 13
Machirori et al., Cogent Medicine (2018),
5: 1442636
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2018.1442636
perceptions of manhood (Wray et al., 2009). Sexual relations proved very important to Black men
and prostate cancer was perceived as something that caused one to lose their ability to maintain
sexual function and limited one’s sexual prowess. Therefore, any screening or testing that was re-
lated to sexual function was avoided (Hughes et al., 2007; Maliski et al., 2008; Nanton & Dale, 2011).
In Akpuaka et al.’s study (2013), a third of the men surveyed held similar views on sexual dysfunc-
tion and screening avoidance. In the same survey, over 80% indicated not being afraid of cancer or
its screening practices suggesting that some men could separate fear of cancer from fear of sexual
dysfunction. This also suggests that their fear of sexual dysfunction impacted more negatively on
their behaviours, than did their lack of fear of screening practices. In addition, inability to maintain
sexual function was linked to a fear that one would lose their partner to other men (Akpuaka et al.,
2013; Anderson et al., 2013). This fear elicited varied reactions to possibility of partner involvement
to allay those fears. In one (Akpuaka et al., 2013) men were adamant that partners did not have to
be informed or involved in prostate cancer discussions, yet in another, the men reported a prefer-
ence to seek support and information from their partners (Cobran et al., 2017). However, these men
reported that a lack of partner support would aect their coping mechanisms and would instead
lead to avoidance behaviours towards prostate cancer screening or treatments.
For both personal and social reasons, prostate cancer practices mostly represented by the digital
rectal examination (DRE) had considerable stigma attached to them. Firstly, men believed DRE in-
creased likelihood of diagnosis and therefore preferred to avoid it, (Harvey & Alston, 2011; Nanton &
Dale, 2011). DRE was primarily seen as an invasion of someone’s privacy and a threat to masculinity
to be avoided. It was additionally not something men wanted others to connect them with (Allen et
al., 2007; Harvey & Alston, 2011; Ocho & Green, 2013; Sanchez et al., 2007). This led to much secrecy
around the practice and fear of impact of one’s sexuality if they underwent DRE (Harvey & Alston,
2011). DRE was linked to homosexuality in many African and Caribbean countries where it was con-
sidered illegal and religiously unacceptable (Mulugeta, 2014; Ng et al., 2013; Sanchez et al., 2007;
Seymour-Smith et al., 2016), with an additional view that touching another man’s genitals was un-
manly (Akpuaka et al., 2013). The societal pressure to conform to these views, with fear of discrimi-
nation if one was found to have undertaken DRE or if one was gay were stronger for some men than
the personal need for screening (Ocho & Green, 2013). There was social consensus that bending over
or bowing are positions that some men find uncomfortable and unwelcome, which suggested a
vulnerability Black men tried to avoid (Akpuaka et al., 2013; Hughes et al., 2007; Ng et al., 2013; Ocho
& Green, 2013).
However, on a personal level, not all men thought the practice was bad especially if they would be
provided with more information about diagnosis and treatment (Anderson et al., 2013; Hughes et al.,
2007). Such a view was substantiated socially as men suggested DRE could be undertaken if one was
very ill or directed by a doctor. The medical directive to undergo the practice rather than personally
request it took the shame out of their hands, reducing stigma and enabling men to keep their identi-
ties (Ocho & Green, 2013; Seymour-Smith et al., 2016). Not only do all these factors lead to complex
cultural beliefs, they also operate under wider structural influences.
Despite these various beliefs, there remained an interest in getting more information about pros-
tate cancer (Oladimeji, Bidemi, Yetunde, Arulogun, & Sola, 2009; Olapade-Olaopa et al., 2014). In
one study, more than 80% of men were interested in receiving more information about causes and
practices of prostate cancer and undertaking regular screening with over 90% believing in the e-
cacy of early detection in increasing survival chances (Oladimeji et al., 2009). Not only do all these
personal and social factors lead to complex cultural beliefs, they also operate under wider structural
influences.
3.2. Structural factors
Structural factors provide an extra dimension to the meaning given to prostate cancer and tend to
be institutional rather than personal or social. The factors, as discussed below, come together to
Page 8 of 13
Machirori et al., Cogent Medicine (2018),
5: 1442636
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2018.1442636
enable or disable prostate cancer screening and treatment practices and how Black men engage
with them.
3.2.1. Medical relationships and access to information
Relationships between Black men and medical systems are two-pronged. In some communities,
Black men do not engage in prostate cancer screening as they perceive the system views them with-
out respect and as uneducated (Allen et al., 2007; Oliver, 2007; Wray et al., 2009). Linked to this was
the belief that because of past events such as the Tuskegee Trial for African-Americans and
Caribbeans, as well as negative experiences of care in general (Allen et al., 2007; Hughes et al., 2007;
Oliver, 2007), the medical system was not to be trusted (Cobran et al., 2017). Health care providers
or researchers who went out into the community were viewed with suspicion as some men were
convinced that those levels of engagement only occurred where the former had something to gain
and did not benefit Black men (Hughes et al., 2007).
Some participants in the studies were convinced that health providers, especially if white, did not
tell the truth, were unsupportive or disinterested in Black men’s health (Nanton & Dale, 2011;
Sanchez et al., 2007) believing too that care or treatment was better for white or rich people (Cobran
et al., 2017; Oliver, 2007; Owens et al., 2015). In addition, inconsistencies in the advice surrounding
prostate cancer screening and management resulted in uncertainty and reduced engagement with
health professionals (Sanchez et al., 2007) with many keeping any concerns away from their health
providers. A lack of general screening programmes, advertisements or open discussions was also
said to discourage normalisation of prostate health-related behaviours in the same way that women
and breast cancer campaigns had done (Nakandi et al., 2013; Oladimeji et al., 2009).
For other men, the value of health care providers was emphasised, as their contribution was wel-
comed to tackle prostate cancer concerns (Anderson et al., 2013). More Black health care providers
were requested for example, with the perception that this would improve access to and use of ser-
vices by creating a connection between patients and doctors. It was presumed that communication
styles would be more responsive to cultural preferences and language, as discussed in the first sec-
tion above, (Allen et al., 2007; Hughes et al., 2007; Mulugeta, 2014; Wray et al., 2009) which would
increase trust and make it easier for men to address feelings of fatalism for instance (Bache et al.,
2012). Men believed if their providers and their community leaders together showed more interest
or gave specific advice or access, they would undertake more screening (Nakandi et al., 2013; Wray
et al., 2009) and expressed disappointment that this was not always the case (Atulomah et al., 2010;
Friedman et al., 2009; Oladimeji et al., 2009).
3.2.1.1. Health focus, medical insurance and treatment costs. The second prong of medical systems
that influence cultural beliefs are the health policies in many African and Caribbean countries. Health
prevention and screening programmes have mostly targeted HIV/AIDS, diabetes and cardiovascular
disease, resulting in a state-wide diversion of resources from, as well as deferred community inter-
est in, prostate cancer. This is given as a reason for men believing prostate cancer is less important
in their communities (Moyo, 2017; Nakandi et al., 2013; Ng et al., 2013; Olapade-Olaopa et al., 2014).
Outside of the UK, restrictive economic barriers such as high treatment costs, lack of insurance,
sometimes coupled with little or no income, result in some men preferring to divert funds to care for
their families. This means they suer disproportionately compared to those with access to care
(Allen et al., 2007; Cobran et al., 2017; Friedman et al., 2009; Oladimeji et al., 2009) which fuels be-
liefs of prostate cancer and related discussions as something to be avoided because of its links with
suering and death.
Viewing media discourse of prostate cancer shows that it excludes Black men as suerers of dis-
ease (Allen et al., 2007) and is also reported to show ignorance towards their preferences of where
information is advertised, such as churches, barber shops and community fairs (Hughes et al., 2007).
Page 9 of 13
Machirori et al., Cogent Medicine (2018),
5: 1442636
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2018.1442636
These lead some Black men to believe that the information in the public domain is not representa-
tive of them, therefore perpetuating the negative meaning of prostate cancer in Black men.
4. Discussion
As shown in the diagram and presentation above, the main themes converge and point to the exist-
ence of several complex beliefs held by Black men regarding prostate cancer, which lead to its cul-
tural meaning. Cultural beliefs are created from individual and social commentary on issues of health
and illness practices. They mix with ideas around identity, responsibility and sexuality and are addi-
tionally influenced by the institutional factors which define the extent to which practices and beliefs
are created and legitimised. Beliefs emerge out of personal meaning, interaction with others who
endorse some of the personal beliefs as well as interactions with structural objects such as institu-
tional practices and health providers. The beliefs do not always align, but may overlap or conflict, and
contextually determine one’s cultural belief system. Several issues of importance are noted.
Although on the surface, Black men appear to face similar concerns regarding prostate cancer, the
impact of the three main themes varies based on the specific ethnic identities and historical con-
texts. Across all Black ethnic groups, prostate cancer is tied in with various perspectives of sexuality,
masculinity and identity. In healthy men, the discourses for masculinity and being a man is strongly
linked to being sexually active and taking care of one’s family. Inability to fulfil these roles threatens
this idea of masculinity resulting in men staying away from anything that might suggest that loss.
In the studies conducted in Africa and specifically on men from African backgrounds, there was a
real fear that men would lose their partners to others if they failed to keep up their sexual relations.
Threats of discrimination and fear of stigma are also discussed, particularly around practices of DRE,
as for most men, implications of homosexuality are illegal. The conflict arises when social recrimina-
tions stop individuals voicing health concerns. Although these ideas of masculinity appear fixed,
they are mediated by diagnosis, one’s faith and paying attention to medical directives to engage in
health practices. Responsibility to one’s family and community become the new discourses that can
help men to maintain their identities of masculinity while attending to health concerns.
The dierent studies suggest that cultural factors are not limited to individuals only. Most knowl-
edge appears to either be taken for granted or learned through behaviours and interactions with
community or family members as well as interactions with health care institutions. A factor that
stands out in the results, is trust in the healthcare system as well as the call for doctors of similar
ethnicities. It appears linked to the experiences of health services that Black men in the UK and USA
have encountered and leads to creation of cultural beliefs based on mistrust of the medical system.
The calls for compassion and matched ethnicities do not appear as profound in African countries
where, as the majority, Black men tend to be exposed to health providers of like ethnicity. There
seems to be more trust towards doctors in these countries although the men face other barriers
such as high medical costs or reduced treatment options with related low incomes. Health relation-
ships, therefore, exert diverse influences on cultural meanings.
The discussions around sexual activities are more prevalent in men of African descent than in their
African-American counterparts, while media representations of prostate cancer in the UK and USA,
rather than a focus on sexual activities, produced a dierent perspective towards the disease. The
focus on dierent health programmes such as HIV/AIDS in Africa and cardiovascular disease and
diabetes in Caribbean countries has diverted interest from prostate cancer. Influences of health
practitioners, media and community impact dierently on men from these diverse Black back-
grounds, as they draw on historical engagement with health and are shown to contribute to the
cultural meaning of prostate cancer.
5. Implications
While ethnicity and culture tend to be spoken of in similar breaths, neither are fixed (Hunt & Bhopal,
2004). Culture can be more closely used to explain a substantial amount of Black men’s behaviours
than ethnicity alone would, with Geertz saying cultural behaviours make sense when placed in the
Page 10 of 13
Machirori et al., Cogent Medicine (2018),
5: 1442636
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2018.1442636
context around them rather than compared to other cultures (Geertz, 1973). Black men’s cultural
prostate cancer beliefs form around dierent contexts as presented above. The reviewed studies
show that while some beliefs are collective, there are ways in which individuals hold diering opin-
ions and create their own divergent beliefs.
Being able to address issues of masculinity and fear in relation to prostate cancer, for example,
will enable men to better cope with diagnosis and decisions to visit one’s doctor (Campbell, Keefe,
McKee, Waters, & Moul, 2012; Hale, Grogan, & Willott Sarah, 2007) Tied in with masculinity were
ideas around the practice of DRE, which continue to feature highly in men’s knowledge and practices
of screening (Gilbert, 2016; Pedersen, Armes, & Ream, 2012). Encouraging men to undergo DRE
needs to consider ways in which men might not feel emasculated, for example changing positions
from bending over to lying on the side (Romero, Romero, Tambara Filho, Brenny Filho, & Oliveira
Júnior, 2011) with the least handling of one’s genitals possible.
Tackling some institutional beliefs and systems can be multi-faceted. Community-based prostate
cancer initiatives that target Black men away from the confines of a GP clinic or hospital setting, can
address communication preferences. An example of understanding community needs is shown in a
study using photo-voice by Gilbert (2016), showcasing some of the ways in which some community
interventions can make use cultural knowledge to enhance information sharing. For men who are
religious or for whom faith is important, an approach that might be suitable is by using local faith
groups to address prostate cancer beliefs and find ways for men in those settings to become more
engaged in prostate cancer screening behaviours (Wilson, 2014). Regarding language, where the
terms “prostate” or “cancer” are not part of everyday speak, there is a need to identify local varia-
tions of the same terms or the nearest possible phrases, that will enable men to start having discus-
sions in ways that are familiar to them and in which they feel comfortable. Examples of initiatives in
the UK targeting both local settings and language include flexible information, recruitment and out-
reach strategies in London (Ream, Finnegan-John, & Pedersen, 2012; Wheelwright, 2016) as well as
“Check Tings Out” campaigns in Nottingham (BME Cancer Communities, 2016; The Voice, 2016). In
the USA, several studies suggest that external settings and more community-based approaches to
discussions around prostate cancer are more likely to reach and engage more Black men than ex-
pectations to go to see one’s physician of their own accord would (Allen et al., 2007; Luque et al.,
2011; Wray et al., 2009).
An essay by Livingston (2013) for example, explores some of these dierent social and structural
reasons that lead to reduced participation in prostate cancer-related services in Sub-Saharan Africa
while a recent meta-analysis highlights the need to tackle institutional contexts of cancer in African
countries. It calls for a dierent approach to prostate cancer priorities (Adeloye et al., 2016) and
reports that the burden of cancer in Black men suggests that there is urgent need to explore all is-
sues contributing to health (International Agency for Research on Cancer & Cancer Research UK,
2014).
Structural barriers and calls for more ethnic matched health providers are discussed as influencing
the experiences Black men have and the ways in which cultural meanings of prostate cancer can be
addressed in response. They show the diversity of men’s interactions with health services, notwith-
standing the multiple barriers they might face; and point to the need to individually assess commu-
nities instead of assuming similarities across Black ethnic groups (Bache et al., 2012; Cuevas, O’Brien,
& Saha, 2016; Stefan, 2015).
It is important that the link between beliefs and prostate cancer be separated from lack of educa-
tion but also made clearer, taking into consideration all the factors raised in this scoping study.
Considering the multiple beliefs Black men hold, education about prostate cancer is important but
alone is inadequate to address reasons that men do not make use of health services.
Page 11 of 13
Machirori et al., Cogent Medicine (2018),
5: 1442636
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2018.1442636
6. Strengths and limitations
The growing burden of cancer globally suggests that policy should not limit itself to categorising
men from Black backgrounds, as there are nuanced dierences in how they view their culture and
the concerns they have regarding prostate cancer. One strength of the scoping study is the iterative
way it was conducted, allowing the researcher to incorporate and refine the study question and
criteria to answer the question. In addition, merging wide literature sources proved useful as it is
from these home countries that some men created their beliefs and something that had been lack-
ing in the wider literature. This study goes some way to show how these dierent beliefs are articu-
lated by the dierent sub-categories of “Black” men. Studies, although wide-reaching, should not be
used to generalise across all Black men as migration patterns, access to information, acculturation
and global communication have not been considered in this study.
A possible weak point of the study might be the lack of quality assessments and inclusion of grey
literature; however, the study is a scoping study of an acutely under-researched area that has signifi-
cant implications in health inequality. Balance is necessary between assessing the information pro-
vided in the studies and the extent to which their methods are described. Usually, where no assessments
are made, a close reading of any study methods and results allows one to assess the utility of the
findings and studies in question. It is the same approach used in this scoping study, where the reader
is invited to assess the study’s rigour based on the description of the methodological decisions made.
Results should be taken with the understanding that study settings diered widely from rural to urban
areas, which in themselves came with varied levels of education, medical access and health status.
Despite these caveats, the results remain important. Black men’s cultural reasons for what they be-
lieve about prostate cancer are varied, and their beliefs are a mesh of personal, social as well as struc-
tural factors. Understanding how these come together to create meaning for prostate cancer is
important in tackling intervening factors that contribute to Black men’s cultural beliefs and behaviours.
Targeting only low knowledge without understanding why people hold the beliefs they do will only
continue to create a gap between knowledge and practice. Multiple approaches are needed to address
the various beliefs that men hold, with generalising across Black ethnic backgrounds likely to be unsuc-
cessful. More individualised and targeted cultural rather than ethnic group focus might produce dier-
ent results, where it is not about education only, but using the views dierent people hold to inform
interventions. Scoping studies can bring in nuanced information from already existing studies, and
provide a better understanding of what culture is and how it can be used to explain the views of men
towards prostate cancer. In this study, fully exploring concepts is useful in creating more meaningful
understanding of beliefs and ways to interpret these into service and health policy changes.
Acknowledgements
We thank reviewers for their comments and suggestions
on an earlier draft. We also thank Rose Thompson and
Lindsay Thompson of BME Cancer Communities and Dr Jo
Armes for their insight into discussions around prostate
cancer and Black men.
Funding
The authors received no direct funding for this research.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Author details
Mavis Machirori
1
E-mail: mavis.machirori@kcl.ac.uk
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9006-3157
Christine Patch
1
E-mail: christine.patch@kcl.ac.uk
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4191-0663
Alison Metcalfe
1
E-mail: alison.metcalfe@kcl.ac.uk
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6466-918X
1
Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery, Palliative
Care, King’s College London, 1.32 James Clerk Maxwell
Building, 57 Waterloo Road, London SE1 8WA, UK.
Citation information
Cite this article as: Study of the relationship between Black
men, culture and prostate cancer beliefs, Mavis Machirori,
Christine Patch & Alison Metcalfe, Cogent Medicine(2018),
5: 1442636.
References
Adeloye, D., David, R. A., Aderemi, A. V., Iseolorunkanmi, A.,
Oyedokun, A., Iweala, E. E. J., … Ayo, C. K. (2016). An
estimate of the incidence of prostate cancer in Africa: A
systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 11(4).
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153496
Aizer, A. A., Wilhite, T. J., Chen, M.-H. H., Graham, P. L., Choueiri, T.
K., Homan, K. E., … Nguyen, P. L. (2014). Lack of reduction in
racial disparities in cancer-specific mortality over a 20-year
period. Cancer, 120(10), 1532–1539. doi:10.1002/cncr.28617
Akpuaka, S. O., Clarke-Tasker, V. A., Nichols-English, G. J., Daniel,
M. G., & Akpuaka, A. I. (2013). Knowledge and perceptions
of prostate cancer among Nigerian male immigrants. ABNF-
Association Of Black Nursing Faculty Journal, 24(1), 23–27.
Page 12 of 13
Machirori et al., Cogent Medicine (2018),
5: 1442636
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2018.1442636
Allen, J. D., Kennedy, M., Wilson-Glover, A., & Gilligan, T. D.
(2007). African-American men’s perceptions about
prostate cancer: Implications for designing educational
interventions. Social Science & Medicine, 64(11),
2189–2200. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.01.007
Anderson, B., Marshall-Lucette, S., & Webb, P. (2013). African
and Afro-Caribbean men’s experiences of prostate cancer.
British Journal of Nursing, 22(22), 1296–1307.
https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2013.22.22.1296
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a
methodological framework. International Journal of Social
Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32.
doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
Atulomah, N. O., Olanrewaju, M. F., Amosu, A. M., & Adedeji, O.
(2010). Level of awareness, perception and screening
behavior regarding prostate cancer among men in a rural
community of ikenne local government area, Nigeria. Primary
Prevention Insights, 2, 11–20. doi:10.4137/PPRI.S5955
Bache, R. A., Bhui, K. S., Dein, S., & Korszun, A. (2012). African
and Black Caribbean origin cancer survivors: A qualitative
study of the narratives of causes, coping and care
experiences. Ethnicity & Health, 17(1–2), 187–201. doi:10.
1080/13557858.2011.635785
Blumer, H. (1986). Symbolic interacionism: Perspective and
method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
BME Cancer Communities. (2016). Prostate cancer risk
assessment. In Check tings out. Retrieved from http://
www.tings.org.uk/
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in
psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–
101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Campbell, L. C., Keefe, F. J., McKee, D. C., Waters, S. J., & Moul, J.
W. ( 2012). Masculinity beliefs predict psychosocial
functioning in African American prostate cancer survivors.
American Journal of Men’s Health, 6(5), 400–408.
doi:10.1177/1557988312450185
Cobran, E. K., Hall, J. N., & Aiken, W. D. (2017, January). African-
American and Caribbean-born men’s perceptions of
prostate cancer fear and facilitators for screening
behavior: A pilot study. Journal of Cancer Education, 1–9.
doi:10.1007/s13187-017-1167-x
Cuevas, A. G., O’Brien, K., & Saha, S. (2016). African American
experiences in healthcare: “I always feel like I’m getting
skipped over”. Health Psychology, 35(9), 987–995.
Retrieved from http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&P
AGE=reference&D=psyc13&NEWS=N&AN=2016-23417-00
1 https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000368
Daudt, H. M. L., van Mossel, C., & Scott, S. J. (2013). Enhancing
the scoping study methodology: A large, inter-professional
team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework.
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(1), 19.
doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-48
Friedman, D. B., Corwin, S. J., Dominick, G. M., & Rose, I. D.
(2009). African American Men’s Understanding and
perceptions about prostate cancer: Why multiple
dimensions of health literacy are important in cancer
communication. Journal of Community Health, 34(5),
449–460. doi:10.1007/s10900-009-9167-3
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected
essays. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Gilbert, L. R. (2016). Photovoice: A link between research and
practice for prostate cancer advocacy in black
communities. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health
Disparities, 4, 364. doi:10.1007/s40615-016-0237-9
Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration. (2017). Global,
Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of
Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted
Life-years for 32 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2015: A Systematic
Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA
Oncology, 3(4), 524–548. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688
Hale, S., Grogan, S., & Willott, S. (2007). Patterns of self-
referral in men with symptoms of prostate disease.
British Journal of Health Psychology, 12(3), 403–419.
doi:10.1348/135910706X118413
Hannes, K. (2011). Critical appraisal of qualitative research. In
J. Noyes, A. Booth, K. Hannes, A. Harden, J. Harris, S.
Lewin, & C. Lockwood (Eds.), Supplementary guidance for
inclusion of qualitative research in cochrane systmeatic
reviews of interventions (Vol. 1, pp. 1–14). Retrieved from
http://cqrmg.cochrane.org/
supplemental-handbook-guidance
Harvey, I. S., & Alston, R. J. (2011). Understanding preventive
behaviors among mid-Western African-American men: A
pilot qualitative study of prostate screening. Journal of
Men’s Health, 8(2), 140–151.
doi:10.1016/j.jomh.2011.03.005
Hughes, G. D., Sellers, D. B., Fraser, L., Teague, R., &
Bern’Nadette Knight, M. S. P. H. (2007). Prostate cancer
community collaboration and partnership: Education,
awareness, recruitment, and outreach to southern
African-American males. Journal of Cultural Diversity,
14(2), 68–73.
Hunt, S. M., & Bhopal, R. (2004). Self report in clinical and
epidemiological studies with non-English speakers: The
challenge of language and culture. Journal of
Epidemiology & Community Health, 58(7), 618–622.
doi:10.1136/jech.2003.010074
International Agency for Research on Cancer and Cancer
Research UK. (2014). World cancer factsheet. In Cancer
Research UK (Eds.), World Health Organization. London.
doi:10.1002/ijc.27711
Jones, A. L. C., & Chinegwundoh, F. (2014). Update on prostate
cancer in Black Men within the UK. Ecancermedicalscience.
Cancer Intelligence, 8.
doi:10.3332/ecancer.2014.455
Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping
studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation
Science, 5(1), 1386. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
Livingston, J. (2013). Cancer in the Shadow of the AIDS
Epidemic in Southern Africa. The Oncologist, 18(7), 783–
786. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0215
Luque, J. S., Rivers, B. M., Gwede, C. K., Kambon, M.a, Lee Green,
B., & Meade, C. D. (2011). Barbershop communications on
prostate cancer screening using barber health advisers.
American Journal of Men’s Health, 5(2), 129–139.
doi:10.1177/1557988310365167
Maliski, S. L., Connor, S. E., Williams, L., & Litwin, M. S. (2010).
Faith among low-income, African American/Black men
treated for prostate cancer. Cancer Nursing, 33(6), 470–
478. doi:10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181e1f7
Maliski, S. L., Rivera, S., Connor, S., Lopez, G., & Litwin, M. S.
(2008). Renegotiating masculine identity after prostate
cancer treatment. Qualitative Health Research, 18(12),
1609–1620. doi:10.1177/1049732308326813
Moyo, S. (2017). Men’s knowledge about prostate cancer: A
case study of rural Mhondoro-Ngezi, Kadoma District,
Zimbabwe. European Journal of Cancer Care, 26, e12493.
doi:10.1111/ecc.12493
Mulugeta, B. (2014). The influence of culture on the views of
black African/African- Caribbean men living in the UK
towards cancer (PhD diss.). University of Lanakshire.
Nakandi, H., Kirabo, M., Semugabo, C., Kittengo, A., Kitayimbwa,
P., Kalungi, S., & Maena, J. (2013). Knowledge, attitudes
and practices of Ugandan men regarding prostate cancer.
African Journal of Urology, 19(4), 165–170. doi:10.1016/j.
au.2013.08.001
Nanton, V., & Dale, J. (2011). ‘It don’t make sense to worry too
much’: The experience of prostate cancer in African-
Caribbean men in the UK. European Journal of Cancer
Care, 20(1), 62–71. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2009.01155.x
Page 13 of 13
Machirori et al., Cogent Medicine (2018),
5: 1442636
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2018.1442636
Ng, P., Schoenfeld, E. R., Hennis, A., Suh-Yuh, W., Leske, M., &
Nemesure, B. (2013). Factors influencing prostate cancer
healthcare practices in Barbados, West Indies. Journal of
Immigrant and Minority Health, 15(3), 653–660.
doi:10.1007/s10903-012-9654-y
Ocho, O. N., & Green, J. (2013). Perception of prostate
screening services among men in Trinidad and Tobago.
Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 10(3), 186–192.
doi:10.1007/s13178-013-0118-5
Oladimeji, O., Bidemi, Y. O., Yetunde, J.-A., Arulogun, O., & Sola,
O. (2009). Prostate cancer awareness, knowledge, and
screening practices among older men in Oyo State,
Nigeria. International Quarterly of Community Health
Education, 30(3), 271–286. doi:10.2190/IQ.30.3.g
Olapade-Olaopa, E. O., Owoaje, E. T., Kola, L., Ladipo, M. M.,
Adebusoye, L., & Adedeji, T. G. (2014). Knowledge and
perception of Nigerian men 40 years and above regarding
prostate cancer. Journal of the West African College of
Surgeons, 4(1), 1–16. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.
nih.gov/pubmed/26587514
Oliver, J. S. (2007). Attitudes and beliefs about prostate cancer
and screening among rural African American men.
Journal of Cultural Diversity 14 (2): 74–80. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19175247
Owens, O. L., Jackson, D. D., Thomas, T. L., Friedman, D. B., &
Hebert, J. R. (2015). Prostate cancer knowledge and
decision making among african-american men and
women in the Southeastern United States. International
Journal of Men’s Health, 14(1), 55–70.
Pedersen, V. H., Armes, J., & Ream, E. (2012). Perceptions of
prostate cancer in Black African and Black Caribbean
men: A systematic review of the literature. Psycho-
Oncology, 21(5), 457–468. doi:10.1002/pon.2043
Prostate Cancer UK. (2016). A Black man’s risk of prostate
cancer | Prostate Cancer UK. Retrieved May 13, 2017, from
https://prostatecanceruk.org/get-involved/black-men-
and-prostate-cancer/
prostate-cancer-and-your-risk/a-black-mans-risk-of-
prostate-cancer
Ream, E., Finnegan-John, J., & Pedersen, V. H. (2012,
September). Evaluation of a community-based prostate
health clinic in London. London: King’s College.
Romero, F. R., Romero, A. W., Tambara Filho, R. T., Brenny Filho,
T. B., & Oliveira Júnior, F. C. d. (2011). Patient positioning
during digital rectal examination of the prostate:
Preferences, tolerability, and results. International
Brazilian Journal of Urology, 37(3), 371–379. doi:10.1590/
S1677-55382011000300011
Sanchez, M. A., Bowen, D. J., Hart Jr., A., & Spigner, C. (2007).
Factors influencing prostate cancer screening decisions
among African American men. Ethnicity & Disease, 17(2),
374–380.
Seymour-Smith, S., Brown, D., Cosma, G., Shopland, N.,
Battersby, S., & Burton, A. (2016). “Our people has got to
come to terms with that”: Changing perceptions of the
digital rectal examination as a barrier to prostate cancer
diagnosis in African-Caribbean men. Psycho-Oncology,
25(10), 1183–1190. doi:10.1002/pon.4219
Shenoy, D., Packianathan, S., Chen, A. M., & Vijayakumar, S.
(2016). Do African-American men need separate prostate
cancer screening guidelines? BMC Urology, 16(1), 19.
doi:10.1186/s12894-016-0137-7
Singh, G., & Jemal, A. (2017). Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic
disparities in cancer mortality, incidence, and survival in
the United States, 1950–2014: Over six decades of
changing patterns and widening inequalities. Journal of
Environmental and Public Health, 2017, 1–19.
doi:10.1155/2017/2819372
Stefan, D. C. (2015). Cancer care in Africa: An overview of
resources. Journal of Global Oncology, 1(1), 30–36.
doi:10.1200/JGO.2015.000406
Thakare, N., & Chinegwundoh, F. (2015). Prostate cancer in the
African-Caribbean community. Trends in Urology and
Men’s Health, 6(4), 32–35. doi:10.1002/tre.472
The Voice. (2016). Nottingham city launches first BME prostate
cancer project. The Voice Online, 20 May. Retrieved May 1,
2017, from http://www.voice-online.co.uk/article/
nottingham-city-launches-first-bme-prostate-cancer-
project
Thompson, R. (2013, February). Hear me now : The
uncomfortable reality of prostate cancer in Black African-
Caribbean Men. BME Cancer Communities.
Wheelwright, R. (2016). Developing and implementing a
community-based prostate cancer awareness and early
detection campaign for hard to reach men. European
Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO), 42(11), S224–S225.
doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2016.07.042
Wilson, S. M. (2014). Prostate cancer support groups in a local
faith community. Journal of Christian Nursing, 31(4), E8–
11. doi:10.1097/CNJ.0000000000000115
Wray, R. J., McClure, S., Vijaykumar, S., Smith, C., Ivy, A., Jupka,
K., & Hess, R. (2009). Changing the conversation about
prostate cancer among African Americans: Results of
formative research. Ethnicity & Health, 14(1), 27–43.
doi:10.1080/13557850802056448
© 2018 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions
You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.