ArticlePDF Available

The slow professor: challenging the culture of speed in the academy, by Maggie Berg and Barbara K. Seeber

Authors:

Abstract

This paper explores the principles of the Slow Movement to counter work-stress among university and college teachers. We believe that a Slow approach to teaching and learning may be the most effective way to counter the erosion of humanistic education by the corporate ethos of consumerism, efficiency, accountability, and standardisation We explore the principles of Slow not only to counter the consumer model of education but also to foster better teachers and learners. It is well-documented that changes in academic work have created significant stress among academic teachers (Catano, Francis, Haines, Kirpalani, Shannon, Stringer, & Lozanksi, 2007; Miller, Buckholdt & Shaw, 2008), and students (Dabney, 1995; Brown & Ralph 1999; Rowbotham and Julian 2006), but what requires further attention is the link between the corporate reliance on efficiency and the problem of lack of time in learning and teaching. Corporatisation has sped up the clock. The Slow Movement—originating in the Slow Food Movement—has gained recognition as a way to resist both globalization and the frantic pace of contemporary life. While slowness has been lauded in architecture, business, urban life and interpersonal relations, among others, it has yet to be applied to academia. Yet, if there is one sector of society that should be cultivating deep thought in themselves and others it is academic teachers. The consumerism that has taken hold in higher education propels the belief that time is money, resulting in superficial learning (Coté & Allahar, 2011b; Readings, 1996). Perhaps the most damaging effect of corporatisation in the universities is that individual educators feel paralysed in the face of overwhelming odds. Our focus on individuals and their own professional practice is conceived as political resistance to corporatisation.
Peer Review Proof - Not Final Version
The Slow Professor: C
hallenging the Culture of Speed in the
Academy
Journal:
Academy of Management Learning & Education
Manuscript ID
AMLE-2017-0282-BRR
Manuscript Type:
Book & Resource Reviews - BY INVITATION ONLY
Submission Keywords:
Strategy Education, Management education
Academy of Management Learning & Education
Peer Review Proof - Not Final Version
1
Copyright Academy of Management Learning and Education
Reviews
The Slow Professor: Challenging the Culture of Speed in the Academy
By Maggie Berg and Barbara K. Seeber, 2016. 115 pages, paperback. Toronto: University of
Toronto Press.
Reviewed by Oliver Laasch, University of Nottingham Ningbo China and Center for
Responsible Management Education (email: olaasch@responsiblemanagement.net )
“The Slow Professor” is the first book bringing together slow principles, as in slow food or slow
fashion, with a concern for the acceleration of academia. The authors, Maggie Berg and Barbara
Seeger, provide a thought-provoking critical appraisal of academic life, with a clear political
agenda to slow it down, one professor at a time.
In the book’s preface, the authors prime readers with “The Slow Professor Manifesto,”
outlining the motivation and main tenets of slow professorship. Then, in the introductory chapter
they make a case for de-accelerating academic life for the wellbeing of all involved in order to,
ultimately, fulfil the purpose of the academic profession. Chapter 1, “Time Management and
Timelessness,” includes a discussion about how common approaches to time management,
centred on doing more in less time and on multitasking, fall short in the academic context. The
authors build upon this context to propose a type of time management through which faculty
members embrace the ultimate goal of doing less, in order to create spaces for “timeless time”
where one can be fully and deeply immersed in meaningful academic pursuits. Chapters 2-4 are
dedicated to describing slowness in particular areas of academic practices. For example, in
Chapter 2, titled “Pedagogy and Pleasure,” Berg and Seeger discuss how to slow-teach in order
Page 1 of 6 Academy of Management Learning & Education
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Peer Review Proof - Not Final Version
2
to make teaching more enjoyable and meaningful for both educators and students. In Chapter 3,
“Research and Understanding,” they highlight the importance of “slow knowledge” (p.58)
development, necessitating a non-linear, iterative process of research that naturally takes time.
As a final example, in Chapter 4 titled “Collegiality and Community,” the authors question the
mutual instrumentalisation of colleagues seeing each other as resources for quick career
progression. Rather than using this approach, they suggest fostering a collegiality that serves as a
holding environment, with the improvement of the welfare of all involved as both its purpose and
outcome. In each of these chapters, the authors not only question the acceleration in key
practices of academic life, but also provide actionable practical advice. Finally, in the concluding
chapter, Chapter 5, titled ”Collaboration and Thinking Together,” the authors include a reflection
on the characteristics of the slow process between themselves that ultimately led to the creation
of this book.
In my reading of “The Slow Professor,” I encountered two main messages. First, there
was a clear message of humanism via a concern for human wellbeing and flourishing which
originates in the authors’ focus on academics’ stress and overwork. I was pleased to discover that
they also shared a message of concern for the wellbeing of people academics relate to, most
prominently students in “humanistic education” (p. ix). This humanistic message is visible across
academic practices, from listening to students and understanding their emotions, to the pleasure
derived from teaching and the self-actualization of doing meaningful research, as well as the
relational aspect of a flourishing academic community. The message of humanism is also visible
in a number of sub-themes, such as personal becoming, mindfulness and a healthy work-life
balance. The second message is more on an individual-level: professorial activism against the
trend towards managerialism and its resultant “corporatization of higher education” (p. ix) in
Page 2 of 6Academy of Management Learning & Education
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Peer Review Proof - Not Final Version
3
universities. The authors present these trends as the root causes of acceleration and
homogenization of academic life through an emphasis on efficiency, measurable progress (e.g.,
through annual reviews), narrow publication standards, time-consuming managerial meetings,
and the standardization of research assessment, to mention a few. Berg and Seeber’s argument is
that these developments threaten the fulfillment of the societal role of professors and universities
to co-create deep, diverse, and critical knowledge. Becoming a slow professor is positioned as a
protest against “corporatization” and its “culture of speed” (p. x). I believe, these arguments are
particularly relevant in the business school context. As business school professors, we may be
more prone to accept corporatization and managerialism as givens than faculty in other
disciplines. After all, they are two topics that serve, for many of us, as central tenets of our
studies.
Upon reflection, I have come to realize that I am a fast professor. However, my reading
of this book was motivated by an emerging appreciation that being fast might be problematic and
create manifold tensions in my life. Working in the area of sustainable development, I constantly
feel the need to speed up, driven by a feeling of urgency that we are running out of time to solve
the world’s social and environmental issues. I am sufficiently egomaniacal to believe I can make
a difference, albeit a small one, through research and teaching. Opportunities to do so appear to
be everywhere. This means I work on too many projects, with too many people at the same time.
I ruthlessly prioritize one project over another based on their potential impact. My days are
fragmented into neat work packages, which I tend to complete. I do not like disruptions, no
matter how well-intended, or socially desirable they may be. I start working while still in bed
before the sun rises, and keep going just as long as concentration and social commitments allow
throughout day, regularly “finishing up one more thing” just before falling asleep. I love goals
Page 3 of 6 Academy of Management Learning & Education
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Peer Review Proof - Not Final Version
4
and don’t mind personal hardship to achieve them. Superiors and colleagues have described me
with adjectives like “fast paced,” “productive,” “reliable,” and “hard working;” all of which
perfectly describe what Berg and Seeger critically call the “machine” (p. 58). Through my life of
constant drive, I now realize that I have a deep longing for de-acceleration, exacerbated by past
episodes of stress-related illness. Reading, reflecting on, and discussing “The Slow Professor”
has helped me to channel a creeping feeling of exhaustion and emerging discontent into a deeper
reflection about what to change and most importantly, why! While only a portion of faculty will
identify themselves with my self-reflection, it exemplifies the potential use of the book for self-
reflection and understanding more broadly, by slow and fast professors and for everyone in
between.
For colleagues who already embrace practices of slowness in their academic lives, the
book may serve to legitimize and defend their “slowness” with the well-researched arguments
made by Berg and Seeger. The book may also be used to review and possibly improve ones’
slow practices, using the very hands-on “practical advice” checklists (e.g. p. 84) that highlight
key aspects of slow teaching, research, and collegiality. I am thinking about printing out these
lists and hanging them on my office wall, to remind me of slowing down, to do fewer, but more
meaningful, things in more time. This may remind me to take time, for instance, to feel the
pleasant anticipation experienced during teaching preparation; to really read key papers and to
enjoy the ideas; to become deeply immersed in conversations with students and to find joy in
exploring how to contribute to their development and help them flourish. I have begun to
cultivate a habit of saying no to less meaningful activities, to free time for the things that matter,
and I am beginning to learn to accept the consequences.
Page 4 of 6Academy of Management Learning & Education
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Peer Review Proof - Not Final Version
5
I genuinely enjoyed the book’s focus on academic practices organized under the larger
areas of teaching, researching, and collegiality while also including individual practices like class
preparation, marking, or “the walk to the library” (p. 66). The book’s how-to advice and
actionable implications are thoroughly grounded in critical reflection and based on extant
literature, both theoretical and empirical. The book is engaging and radiates the authors’ passion
for slowness. Sometimes, I would have liked to see a broader selection of issues and topics, in a
bit less of an auto-ethnographic style. For instance, I found myself wondering for what
percentage of the book’s readership is stage fright in teaching a major concern justifying its
extensive coverage. That being said, writing a book is often a personal expression of oneself, and
might lose authenticity if there was an attempt to cover things that the authors had not lived
themselves. Berg and Seeber make explicit the collaborative nature of the book project and share
their voices through a first person narrative, particularly in Chapters 2 (on teaching) and chapter
3 (on research). However, at times, I found myself struggling to understand who was speaking
and from what perspective. In my opinion, Chapter 4 on collegiality might have been set up with
a somewhat broader coverage. After the deep discussions on teaching and research in Chapters 3
and 4, I was looking for a chapter that covered a wider range of other academic practices. The
narrow, albeit important, focus on collegiality left me wanting for more. Also, in comparison to
previous chapters, Chapter 4 falls a bit short in terms of actionable advice, which appears to have
been added more as an afterthought, as one of the “anonymous reviewers expressed
disappointment at their absence” (p. 84). In the end, these are minor points in the context of a
highly contributory book.
Overall, I believe “The Slow Professor” will be an exciting and engaging read for
everyone interested in the acceleration of academic life. As compliments to this book, for readers
Page 5 of 6 Academy of Management Learning & Education
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Peer Review Proof - Not Final Version
6
who want to learn more about the underlying themes of becoming a slow professor,, I would
recommend “In Praise of Slow” (Honoré, 2009), a seminal publication of the slow movement.
Additionally, to extend the humanistic argument as it relates to the development of both
professors and students, I recommend the humanistic management education book “Business
Schools under Fire” (Amann, Pirson, Dierksmeier, Von Kimakowitz, & Spitzeck, 2011), and
“The Knowledge Factory” for a critical appraisal of the corporatization of universities
(Aronowitz, 2000). It is surely time for each of us to take a moment to pause, reconsider, and
appreciate the possibilities of becoming slow.
REFERENCES
Amann, W., Pirson, M., Dierksmeier, C., Von Kimakowitz, E., & Spitzeck, H. 2011. Business
schools under fire: Humanistic management education as the way forward. New York:
Palgrave Macmillan.
Aronowitz, S. 2000. The knowledge factory: Dismantling the corporate university and creating
true higher learning: Beacon Press.
Honoré, C. 2009. In praise of slow: How a worldwide movement is challenging the cult of
speed. Toronto: Vintage Canada.
Page 6 of 6Academy of Management Learning & Education
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
This paper uses elements of Weberian and Foucauldian social theory to speculate on the consequences of recent higher education change in the UK. We argue that changes in the political, institutional and funding environment have produced forms of HE organization that increase the power of management and diminish the autonomy of professional academics. These new forms of organization, which are increasingly bureaucratic and utilize sophisticated systems of surveillance, will make academics increasingly instrumental in their attitudes and behaviour. We conclude that the rationalization of HE should be resisted, but that nostalgia for a previous order should not be part of that resistance. `Mass' higher education organizations are not simply good or bad, but their rationale and consequences need to be clearly thought through if their negative aspects are to be addressed.
Book
Until very recently, American universities were led mainly by their faculties, which viewed intellectual production and pedagogy as the core missions of higher education. Today, as Benjamin Ginsberg warns in this eye-opening, controversial book, "deanlets"--administrators and staffers often without serious academic backgrounds or experience--are setting the educational agenda. The Fall of the Faculty examines the fallout of rampant administrative blight that now plagues the nation's universities. In the past decade, universities have added layers of administrators and staffers to their payrolls every year even while laying off full-time faculty in increasing numbers--ostensibly because of budget cuts. In a further irony, many of the newly minted--and non-academic--administrators are career managers who downplay the importance of teaching and research, as evidenced by their tireless advocacy for a banal "life skills" curriculum. Consequently, students are denied a more enriching educational experience--one defined by intellectual rigor. Ginsberg also reveals how the legitimate grievances of minority groups and liberal activists, which were traditionally championed by faculty members, have, in the hands of administrators, been reduced to chess pieces in a game of power politics. By embracing initiatives such as affirmative action, the administration gained favor with these groups and legitimized a thinly cloaked gambit to bolster their power over the faculty. As troubling as this trend has become, there are ways to reverse it. The Fall of the Faculty outlines how we can revamp the system so that real educators can regain their voice in curriculum policy.
Book
What happens to the liberal arts and science education when universities attempt to sell it asa form of job training? In Lowering Higher Education, a follow-up to their provocative 2007 book Ivory Tower Blues, James E. Côté and Anton L. Allahar explore the subverted ‘idea of the university’ and the forces that have set adrift the mission of these institutions. Côté and Allahar connect the corporatization of universities to a range of contentious issues within highereducation, from lowered standards and inflated grades to the overall decline of Humanities, Social Sciences, and Natural Sciences instruction. Lowering Higher Education points to a fundamental disconnect between policymakers, who may rarely set foot in contemporary classrooms, and the teachers who must implement their educational policies—which the authors argue are poorly informed—on a daily basis. Côté and Allahar expose stakeholder misconceptions surrounding the current culture of academic disengagement and supposed power of new technologies to motivate students. While outlining what makes the status quo dysfunctional, Lowering Higher Education also offers recommendations that have the potential to reinvigorate liberal education
Book
The present state of the university is a difficult issue to comprehend for anyone outside of the education system. If we are to believe common government reports that changes in policy are somehow making life easier for university graduates, we cannot help but believe that things are going right and are getting better in our universities. Ivory Tower Blues gives a decidedly different picture, examining this optimistic attitude as it impacts upon professors, students, and administrators in charge of the education system. Ivory Tower Blues is a frank account of the contemporary university, drawing on the authors? own research and personal experiences, as well as on input from students, colleagues, and administrators. James E. Côté and Anton L. Allahar offer an insider?s account of the university system, an accurate, alternative view to that overwhelmingly presented to the general public. Throughout, the authors argue that fewer and fewer students are experiencing their university education in ways expected by their parents and the public. The majority of students are hampered by insufficient preparation at the secondary school level, lack of personal motivation, and disillusionment. Contrary to popular opinion, there is no administrative or governmental procedure in place to maintain standards of education. Ivory Tower Blues is an in-depth look at the crisis facing Canadian and American universities, the factors that are precipitating the situation, and the long-term impact this crisis will have on the quality of higher education.
Book
'Eggshell days' is how one teacher in this study describes the experience of stress. Stressed teachers here relate their experiences, perceptions and feelings as they hit rock-bottom. They describe the help and the strategies that enable them to recover and the ways they renegotiate their lives to move forward. Their stories throw light on what has become a crucial personal, family and societal issue that is increasingly prevalent among educators and other public service providers. They also offer hope to others in a similar plight. The book examines the individual psychologies of this group of stressed teachers, their work patterns, roles and relationships - and their steps towards recovery. It also highlights the ways the current education system contributes to teacher stress and indicates how dysfunctional school support systems can be changed so that teachers work in a collegiate and supportive environment. .
Book
In this short and powerful book, celebrated philosopher Martha Nussbaum makes a passionate case for the importance of the liberal arts at all levels of education. Historically, the humanities have been central to education because they have rightly been seen as essential for creating competent democratic citizens. But recently, Nussbaum argues, thinking about the aims of education has gone disturbingly awry both in the United States and abroad. Anxiously focused on national economic growth, we increasingly treat education as though its primary goal were to teach students to be economically productive rather than to think critically and become knowledgeable and empathetic citizens. This shortsighted focus on profitable skills has eroded our ability to criticize authority, reduced our sympathy with the marginalized and different, and damaged our competence to deal with complex global problems. And the loss of these basic capacities jeopardizes the health of democracies and the hope of a decent world. In response to this dire situation, Nussbaum argues that we must resist efforts to reduce education to a tool of the gross national product. Rather, we must work to reconnect education to the humanities in order to give students the capacity to be true democratic citizens of their countries and the world. Drawing on the stories of troubling--and hopeful--educational developments from around the world, Nussbaum offers a manifesto that should be a rallying cry for anyone who cares about the deepest purposes of education.
Article
What makes the modern university different from any other corporation? asked Columbia's Andrew Delbanco recently in the New York Times. There is more and more reason to think: less and less,he answered.In this provocative book, Frank Donoghue shows how this growing corporate culture of higher education threatens its most fundamental values by erasing one of its defining features: the tenured professor.Taking a clear-eyed look at American higher education over the last twenty years, Donoghue outlines a web of forces-social, political, and institutional-dismantling the professoriate. Today, fewer than 30 percent of college and university teachers are tenured or on tenure tracks, and signs point to a future where professors will disappear. Why? What will universities look like without professors? Who will teach? Why should it matter? The fate of the professor, Donoghue shows, has always been tied to that of the liberal arts-with thehumanities at its core. The rise to prominence of the American university has been defined by the strength of the humanities and by the central role of the autonomous, tenured professor who can be both scholar and teacher. Yet in today's market-driven, rank-and ratings-obsessed world of higher education, corporate logic prevails: faculties are to be managed for optimal efficiency, productivity, and competitive advantage casual armies of adjuncts and graduate students now fill the demand for teachers.Bypassing the distractions of the culture wars and other crises,Donoghue sheds light on the structural changes in higher education-the rise of community colleges and for-profit universities, the frenzied pursuit of prestige everywhere, the brutally competitive realities facing new Ph.D.s -that threaten the survival of professors as we've known them. There are no quick fixes in The Last Professors; rather, Donoghue offers his fellow teachers and scholarsan essential field guide to making their way in a world that no longer has room for their dreams.