ArticlePDF Available

The Most Important Leadership Competencies, According to Leaders Around the World

Authors:
  • Quantum Leadership Group

Abstract

What makes an effective leader? This question is a focus of my research as an organizational scientist, executive coach, and leadership development consultant. Looking for answers, I recently completed the first round of a study of 195 leaders in 15 countries over 30 global organizations. Participants were asked to choose the 15 most important leadership competencies from a list of 74. I’ve grouped the top ones into five major themes that suggest a set of priorities for leaders and leadership development programs. While some may not surprise you, they’re all difficult to master, in part because improving them requires acting against our nature.
Giles, Sunnie. "The most important leadership competencies, according to leaders around the
world." Harvard Business Review (March 15, 2016).
What makes an effective leader? This question is a focus of my research as an
organizational scientist, executive coach, and leadership development consultant. Looking
for answers, I recently completed the first round of a study of 195 leaders in 15 countries
over 30 global organizations. Participants were asked to choose the 15 most important
leadership competencies from a list of 74. I’ve grouped the top ones into five major themes
that suggest a set of priorities for leaders and leadership development programs. While
some may not surprise you, they’re all difficult to master, in part because improving them
requires acting against our nature.
Demonstrates strong ethics and provides a sense of safety.
This theme combines two of the three most highly rated attributes: “high ethical and moral
standards” (67% selected it as one of the most important) and “communicating clear
expectations” (56%).
Taken together, these attributes are all about creating a safe and trusting environment. A
leader with high ethical standards conveys a commitment to fairness, instilling confidence
that both they and their employees will honor the rules of the game. Similarly, when
leaders clearly communicate their expectations, they avoid blindsiding people and ensure
that everyone is on the same page. In a safe environment employees can relax, invoking the
brain’s higher capacity for social engagement, innovation, creativity, and ambition.
Neuroscience corroborates this point. When the amygdala registers a threat to our safety,
arteries harden and thicken to handle an increased blood flow to our limbs in preparation
for a fight-or-flight response. In this state, we lose access to the social engagement system
of the limbic brain and the executive function of the prefrontal cortex, inhibiting creativity
and the drive for excellence. From a neuroscience perspective, making sure that people feel
safe on a deep level should be job #1 for leaders.
But how? This competency is all about behaving in a way that is consistent with your
values. If you find yourself making decisions that feel at odds with your principles or
justifying actions in spite of a nagging sense of discomfort, you probably need to reconnect
with your core values. I facilitate a simple exercise with my clients called “Deep Fast
Forwarding” to help with this. Envision your funeral and what people say about you in a
eulogy. Is it what you want to hear? This exercise will give you a clearer sense of what’s
important to you, which will then help guide daily decision making.
To increase feelings of safety, work on communicating with the specific intent of making
people feel safe. One way to accomplish this is to acknowledge and neutralize feared results
or consequences from the outset. I call this “clearing the air.” For example, you might
approach a conversation about a project gone wrong by saying, “I’m not trying to blame
you. I just want to understand what happened.”
Empowers others to self-organize.
Providing clear direction while allowing employees to organize their own time and work
was identified as the next most important leadership competency.
No leader can do everything themselves. Therefore, it’s critical to distribute power
throughout the organization and to rely on decision making from those who are closest to
the action.
Research has repeatedly shown that empowered teams are more productive and proactive,
provide better customer service, and show higher levels of job satisfaction and
commitment to their team and organization. And yet many leaders struggle to let people
self-organize. They resist because they believe that power is a zero-sum game, they are
reluctant to allow others to make mistakes, and they fear facing negative consequences
from subordinates’ decisions.
To overcome the fear of relinquishing power, start by increasing awareness of physical
tension that arises when you feel your position is being challenged. As discussed above,
perceived threats activate a fight, flight, or freeze response in the amygdala. The good news
is that we can train our bodies to experience relaxation instead of defensiveness when
stress runs high. Try to separate the current situation from the past, share the outcome you
fear most with others instead of trying to hold on to control, and remember that giving
power up is a great way to increase influence which builds power over time.
Fosters a sense of connection and belonging.
Leaders who “communicate often and openly” (competency #6) and “create a feeling of
succeeding and failing together as a pack” (#8) build a strong foundation for connection.
We are a social species we want to connect and feel a sense of belonging. From an
evolutionary perspective, attachment is important because it improves our chances of
survival in a world full of predators. Research suggests that a sense of connection could
also impact productivity and emotional well-being. For example, scientists have found that
emotions are contagious in the workplace: Employees feel emotionally depleted just by
watching unpleasant interactions between coworkers.
From a neuroscience perspective, creating connection is a leader’s second most important
job. Once we feel safe (a sensation that is registered in the reptilian brain), we also have to
feel cared for (which activates the limbic brain) in order to unleash the full potential of our
higher functioning prefrontal cortex.
There are some simple ways to promote belonging among employees: Smile at people, call
them by name, and remember their interests and family members’ names. Pay focused
attention when speaking to them, and clearly set the tone of the members of your team
having each other’s backs. Using a song, motto, symbol, chant, or ritual that uniquely
identifies your team can also strengthen this sense of connection.
Shows openness to new ideas and fosters organizational learning.
What do “flexibility to change opinions” (competency #4), “being open to new ideas and
approaches” (#7), and “provides safety for trial and error” (#10) have in common? If a
leader has these strengths, they encourage learning; if they don’t, they risk stifling it.
Admitting we’re wrong isn’t easy. Once again, the negative effects of stress on brain
function are partly to blame in this case they impede learning. Researchers have
found that reduced blood flow to our brains under threat reduces peripheral vision,
ostensibly so we can deal with the immediate danger. For instance, they have observed a
significant reduction in athletes’ peripheral vision before competition. While tunnel vision
helps athletes focus, it closes the rest of us off to new ideas and approaches. Our opinions
are more inflexible even when we’re presented with contradicting evidence, which makes
learning almost impossible.
To encourage learning among employees, leaders must first ensure that they are open to
learning (and changing course) themselves. Try to approach problem-solving discussions
without a specific agenda or outcome. Withhold judgment until everyone has spoken, and
let people know that all ideas will be considered. A greater diversity of ideas will emerge.
Failure is required for learning, but our relentless pursuit of results can also discourage
employees from taking chances. To resolve this conflict, leaders must create a culture that
supports risk-taking. One way of doing this is to use controlled experiments think A/B
testing that allow for small failures and require rapid feedback and correction. This
provides a platform for building collective intelligence so that employees learn from each
other’s mistakes, too.
Nurtures growth.
“Being committed to my ongoing training” (competency #5) and “helping me grow into a
next-generation leader” (#9) make up the final category.
All living organisms have an innate need to leave copies of their genes. They maximize their
offspring’s chances of success by nurturing and teaching them. In turn, those on the
receiving end feel a sense of gratitude and loyalty. Think of the people to whom you’re most
grateful parents, teachers, friends, mentors. Chances are, they’ve cared for you or taught
you something important.
When leaders show a commitment to our growth, the same primal emotions are tapped.
Employees are motivated to reciprocate, expressing their gratitude or loyalty by going the
extra mile. While managing through fear generates stress, which impairs higher brain
function, the quality of work is vastly different when we are compelled by appreciation. If
you want to inspire the best from your team, advocate for them, support their training and
promotion, and go to bat to sponsor their important projects.
These five areas present significant challenges to leaders due to the natural responses that
are hardwired into us. But with deep self-reflection and a shift in perspective (perhaps
aided by a coach), there are also enormous opportunities for improving everyone’s
performance by focusing on our own.
Dr. Sunnie Giles is a professionally certified executive coach, leadership development
consultant and organizational scientist. She is President of Quantum Leadership Group. She
has an MBA from the University of Chicago and PhD from Brigham Young University.
... According to the percentage of responders, high ethics and safety ranked as the top category. This group included the most highly rated attributes, high ethical and moral standards and communicating clear expectations (Giles, 2016). This suggests that even, leaders themselves value integrity. ...
... Given that integrity has been variously described by management experts and leadership researchers as the leader's "currency" (Michael, 2024;Ponomarenko, 2016;Giles, 2016), it is clear that it is an indispensable tool for leadership success, as it is foundational in building trust with followers and upholding ethical standards (Bauman, 2013). To secure an organization's growth, the study examines the importance of leadership integrity and how it might be institutionalized. ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper critically examines integrity as a foundational element of leadership and its impact on moral decision-making, organizational trust, and sustained success. A thorough analysis of interdisciplinary literature highlights the need to develop integrity-driven leadership cultures and stresses the incorporation of ethical frameworks into healthcare leadership education. The results offer doable tactics for promoting accountability, openness, and moral coherence in a variety of organizational settings. Effective and long-lasting leadership is built on integrity. Between leaders and their staff, it creates an unbreakable bond of trust that promotes credibility, inspiration, moral decision-making, and a robust corporate culture. Integrity in leadership has the power to leave a lasting impression on a company's clients, staff members, and prospective customers. They contribute to a happy workplace by keeping the company's values. It is the pillar of leadership, serving as a beacon of trust and credibility for followers. Leaders who maintain high decent standards and demonstrate consistency between their words and actions inspire confidence and loyalty among their teams. When leaders act with integrity, they create clear evidence for others to follow, fostering a culture of honesty, transparency, and accountability within the organization. It is on the basis above that this article reviewed literature bringing to light the role of integrity in leadership. The article presents that integrity impacts an organization’s success and that leaders who embody integrity are better equipped to navigate challenges and crises effectively. It also presents creating an organizational culture to nurture Integrity Leadership. Finally, it touches on the integrity in the training of healthcare professionals. The article concludes that as a pillar of leadership, integrity is not just a nice to have; it is essential for long-term success. By embodying integrity in all that they do, leaders can inspire greatness in themselves and in those they lead.
... Empathy is an important tool for preventing burnout in working women of color, and it "may represent the type of systemic support that previously has not been available to them." (Deloitte, 2023; Lazányi & Bilan, 2017) (Giles, 2016) Building on the previously discussed competencies and leadership styles, the paper "Leadership Styles and Employee Expectations", involving 185 employees from 10 ...
... This goes hand in hand with the increased importance of purpose for employees (Väth, 2016) and the importance put on a leader's ability to develop a vision and to be inspirational -to convey purpose -which both rank within the top 15 Abilities. This focus on values are tied to strong ethics which is required in the modern world according to Dr. Giles (Giles, 2016) which can be confirmed. Ethics and morale is among the third most important Abilities leaders need to display. ...
Thesis
Full-text available
In the rapidly changing landscape of the corporate world, the significance of effective leadership has never been more pronounced. This research delves into the pivotal question: What are the key leadership competencies in the post-pandemic era? The backdrop of this inquiry is set against the shifts in the New World of Work due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which has not only redefined leadership but also posed challenges and opportunities for leaders globally. The central finding of this study underscores the evolution of leadership dynamics in response to the pandemic. Traditional leadership models require augmentation to cater to the demands of a transformed work environment. The research reveals that leadership in the post-pandemic world places a heightened emphasis on empathy, agility, resilience, and a pronounced focus on health and well-being. Furthermore, the study highlights the importance of understanding the unique characteristics and expectations of Generation Z, as they play an increasingly influential role in shaping the future of work. In conclusion, this research offers a robust framework for understanding leadership in the New World of Work. The insights gained are not just academic but have profound practical implications, aiding leaders in their journeys in this ever-evolving landscape. The significance of this work lies in its timely exploration of leadership competencies, providing a roadmap for practitioners to navigate the challenges and opportunities of a post-pandemic world.
... Giles (2016) identified what survey respondents reported what they considered to be the top ten leadership competencies. These were then grouped into five themes. ...
... These communal styles are routinely juxtaposed against strictly agentic approaches-such as autocratic leadership and management by exception-that promote employee turnover and reduce leader effectiveness if not complemented with certain communal behaviors (Lowe et al., 1996;Van Vugt et al., 2004). Practitioners have begun to tout more communal styles, identifying characteristics like openness, relationship-building, and emotional intelligence as critical leadership competencies (Giles, 2016). The increasing focus on leader communality is further reflected in recent advances on dominance and prestige pathways to social influence. ...
Article
Full-text available
Widespread narratives about leadership often emphasize the importance of exhibiting agentic traits like assertiveness, ambition, and confidence. Counter to this perspective, the present research suggests that when evaluating leaders, followers especially value communal traits, such as honesty, open-mindedness, and compassion—even at the expense of agentic traits. Eight preregistered studies (N = 3,682) support our theorizing. In Study 1, we find that people describe their ideal leader as more communal than the typical leader, representing a divide between preferred versus prototypical leaders. We then examine the preference for communality in leaders at the trait level (Studies 2 and 3) and in evaluations of candidates for leadership positions (Studies 4a–5). Further, we find that followers’ preference for communal leaders is explained, in part, by the anticipation that a communal leader will create a more psychologically safe climate than an agentic leader (Study 6). Finally, we evince one reason communal leaders may not emerge—communality does not predict self-selection into leadership pathways (Study 7). Taken together, our findings suggest that prominent narratives about leadership have tended to downplay the importance and appeal of communal traits for followers.
... 195 vezető rangsorolt 74 jellemzőt egy kutatás során (Giles, 2016). Ez alapján meghatározták a 10 legfontosabb vezetői tulajdonságot. ...
Article
Full-text available
Háttér és célkitűzések: A vezetői kompetenciák vizsgálata alulkutatott terület, a rendelkezésre álló szakirodalom sokkal inkább a vezetői személyiségdimenziókra fókuszál, kevéssé a vezetői kompetenciákra. Hasonlóképpen kevés forrás áll rendelkezésünkre a köz- és versenyszféra vezetőivel kapcsolatosan. Jelen vizsgálatban arra vállalkoztunk, hogy összehasonlítsuk a közép- és felső vezetők, valamint a köz- és versenyszféra vezetőinek kompetenciáit. Feltételeztük, hogy a versenyszféra vezetői nagyobb önállósággal jellemezhetőbbek, míg a közszféra vezetőire inkább végrehajtó kompetenciák jellemzőek. Módszer: Vizsgálatunkban 303 felső és középvezető adatait elemeztük 19 szervezetnél (11 a versenyszférában, 8 a közszférában működik). A vezetői kompetenciák mérésére a CAPTain Analízis & Szubjektív Kompetenciatesztet használtuk, amelynek 11 kompetenciadimenziója mentén hasonlítottuk össze a vezetői szint és a szféra közötti különbségeket. Eredmények: Szignifikáns különbséget találtunk a felső és középvezetők között Önállóság, Vezetői stílus, Delegálás, Befolyásolás, Aktuális vezetői képesség, valamint az Önbizalom kompetenciadimenzióiban. A felsorolt dimenziókban a felső vezetők magasabb pontszámot értek el. Szignifikáns különbségeket találtunk a köz- és versenyszféra vezetői közötti is: a versenyszféra vezetői magasabb Önállóság, Delegálás, Befolyásolás, Aktuális vezetői képesség és Önbizalom kompetencia-pontszámokat értek el, mint a közszféra vezetői. Következtetések: Eredményeink alapján elmondható, hogy a felső vezetőkre jellemzőbb, hogy munkájukat általánosabb irányelvek mentén, magabiztosabban végzik, míg a középvezetők nagyobb igényt mutatnak a konkrét instrukciókra. A versenyszféra vezetőire hasonló profil jellemző, ráadásul párhuzam vonható a versenyszféra közép- és a közszféra felső vezetői között.
... Las Instituciones de Educación deben considerar un Liderazgo Situacional en su plantilla docente, Kurt Lewin relaciona el estilo de liderazgo con el tipo de personas a los que hay que liderar, relacionando el estilo de dirección con el grado de madurez del grupo, ya que se tienen elementos de transformación que contemplan diferentes estilos de liderazgo en entornos que se pueden utilizar dentro de su gestión en la docencia como: [27]. ...
Article
Full-text available
El propósito de este trabajo es presentar una revisión teórica de los aspectos más relevantes que contribuyan a una nueva perspectiva de investigación orientada hacia el liderazgo en la formación de docente en la era digital para las organizaciones educativas. Se plantea la necesidad de identificar y definir las características y cualidades de un líder formador de docentes acorde al fenómeno digital actual presente en las Instituciones Educativas (IE), haciendo énfasis en la importancia de las Tecnologías de la Información (TIC) utilizando el modelo TPACK (Conocimiento Técnico Pedagógico del Contenido) como elemento distintivo en la formación y en la búsqueda de competencias dentro del liderazgo. Se concluye en que es importante pensar y establecer los patrones que hacen que el liderazgo en la formación del docente dentro de las organizaciones educativas sea considerado líder en el contexto tecnológico.
... Teaching ethics, first and foremost, is the core of every Jesuit university, and there is no doubt that ethics and moral standards are essential for effective leadership (Giles, 2016). Second, Seidman's element of "stop and think" is found in Ignatian teaching as the element of reflection, which is important not only for leadership but also for learning. ...
Article
Full-text available
Resumen El propósito de esta revisión es analizar la convergencia de dos pilares fundamentales en el campo educativo: el liderazgo transformacional según la teoría de Burns (1978), y el trabajo colaborativo desde la perspectiva de Vygotsky (1978), centrándose en el aprendizaje a través de la interacción social y la colaboración entre pares, que servirá de insumo para examinar las estrategias y acciones propuestas desde el enfoque práctico de aula que propone Díaz (2006). Se pretende examinar cómo la integración de estos enfoques puede fomentar un entorno educativo enriquecedor que conduzca al desarrollo integral de los educandos. Desde la teoría del liderazgo transformacional de Burns (1978), se estudia sus ideas clave e influencia dentro del campo educativo, se revisa en paralelo con el trabajo colaborativo de Vygotsky (1978), desde el enfoque práctico de aula de Díaz (2006), y cómo la relación entre estas teorías puede favorecer la cultura de liderazgo participativo y motivador entre docentes y estudiantes. Finalmente, se espera generar un impacto social que no se centre únicamente en las conclusiones y recomendaciones sino también, en los procesos de construcción, discusión y escritura del documento que, con cada palabra, contribuye a mejorar la comprensión de una forma más holística sobre el liderazgo, el trabajo colaborativo y su relación desde el aula, dentro del ámbito educativo. Palabras clave liderazgo, enfoque colaborativo, prácticas de aula Abstract The purpose of this literature review is to analyze the convergence of two fundamental pillars in the educational field: transformational leadership according to Burns' (1978), theory, and collaborative work from Vygotsky's (1978), perspective focusing on learning through social interaction and peer collaboration, which will serve as input to examine the strategies and actions proposed from the practical classroom approach proposed by Díaz (2006). This review aims to examine how the integration of these approaches can foster an enriching educational environment conducive to the integral development of learners. From the transformational leadership theory of Burns (1978), its key ideas and influence within the educational field will be studied, the parallel with the collaborative work of Vygotsky (1978), will be reviewed from the practical classroom approach of Díaz (2006), and how the relationship between these theories can favor the culture of participative and motivating leadership among teachers and students. Finally, it is expected to generate a social impact that is not only focused on the conclusions and recommendations but also on the processes of construction, discussion and writing of the document that, with each word, contributes to improve the understanding of a more holistic way about leadership, collaborative work and its relationship from the classroom, within the educational environment.
Article
Full-text available
The main aim of this research is to explore and analyse leadership in the very democratic Batak tribe in Indonesia from the perspective of Batak customary law. The research method used is normative juridical legal research with a qualitative descriptive analysis method approach and also uses an existing conceptual approach model on leadership to then generate new ideas. as well as processing primary data and secondary data. The findings of this study are that the leadership style resulting from Machiavelli's political philosophy tends to be expensive, and there is a political dowry. Then, leadership in the Trias Politics conception tends to manipulate and abuse power such as corruption, tyranny and dynastic power. As a result, gave birth to leaders who behave like immoral wolves, homo homini lupus. On the other hand, the leadership style of the Batak tribe from the perspective of Batak customary law tends to mean maintaining harmony, which is a noble cultural value in terms of organizational leadership related to social relations, a well-organized organization and power distributed evenly. Thus, it is hoped that this study will be useful for the government, legislators and other stakeholders to use as an idea and reference approach in making efforts to choose a harajaon leadership based on dalihan natolu, which is a medium that contains objective legal principles based on kinship, brotherhood and cooperation by the mandate of paragraph IV of the Preamble to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Article
In the era of globalization and information technology, when companies are becoming more and more important participants in public life, issues of social responsibility are becoming particularly acute. However, despite the positive aspects of business social responsibility, such as improving the company’s image, increasing employee and consumer loyalty, there are also negative aspects of this concept that require careful analysis. The negative aspects of the concept of social responsibility of business are not only the potential decrease in economic efficiency due to increased spending on social programs, but also the possibility of abuse of this concept for marketing purposes without a real contribution to the social development of territories. There is a risk that social responsibility may turn into a corporate propaganda tool that covers up companies’ unethical practices. This casts doubt on the effectiveness and sincerity of business social initiatives, as well as raises the problem of insufficient transparency and control over the implementation of the principles of social responsibility. The study of the negative aspects of the concept of social responsibility of business allows identifying the weaknesses of this approach, which is important for the development of more effective strategies and mechanisms for the implementation of social responsibility. The study provides examples for revising and modernizing the concept of business social responsibility, taking into account different economic systems.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.