ArticlePDF Available

LEARNER AUTONOMY ON ESSAY WRITING ACCURACY

Authors:
  • STKIP PGRI Bangkalan

Abstract

Learner autonomy on writing is independently teaching and learning that keeps students’ control to explore their knowledge and experiences in written language, find out and evaluate their errors based on the conceptual courses to make accurately simple essay. The aim was to know the effectiveness of the learner autonomy on writing accuracy. This quantitative research conducted in one group pretest and posttest design. The number of samples was 21 students in Bangkalan. The instrument were tests to gain students’ writing score before and after treatment. Researcher statistically analyzed the data using SPSS 23 version by running a Paired Samples Test. The result shown the means of pretes score was 66,83 and posttest score was 74,57, Paired Samples Correlations was 0,614 (strong correlation). Significance was 0,005, it means that a (0,05) is higher than r value (0,005) with high variance of mean value (14,091). As a result, the hypothesis (H1­) was received that learner autonomy contributed effectively to learners’ in organizing own ideas (Ene, 2006) such as making a topic map becomes some explanable sub-topics, writing down main and supporting idea, clustering some objects, editing next and learners absolutely accumulate some selected vocabularies inappropriate topics (Chengping W, 2008).Keyword: Learner Autonomy, Learning process, outcomesAbsrak: Pembelajaran otonomi adalah pembelajaran mandiri yang mengontrol mahasiswa untuk menyampaikan gagasan dan pengalamannya, mencatat dan mengevaluasi kesalahan yang terjadi dalam penulisan esai sederhana berdasarkan pembelajaran yang tersetruktur. Tujuan adalah untuk mengetahui efektifitas pembelajaran otonomi terhadap akurasi tulisan secara statistik. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan desain tes awal dan akhir. Jumlah sampel terdiri dari 21 siswa di Bangkalan. Isntrumen yang digunakan adalah tes untuk mengetahui hasil nilai mahasiswa sebelum dan sesudah melakukan pembelajaran otonomi. Peneliti menganalisa data dengan menggunakan versi SPSS 23 dengan menggunakan sampel tes yang berpasangan. Hasil rata-rata tes awal adalah 66,83 dan tes akhir adalah 74,57, dengan corelasi sampel berpasangannya adalah 0,614 (kuat). Sedangkan signifikansinya adalah 0,005, artinya a (0,05) lebih besar daripada r value (0,005) dengan varian nilai rata-rata yang tinggi (14,091). Hasil hipotesis (H1)-nya diterima bahwa pembelajara otonomi berkontribusi secara efektif terhadap pengorganisasian gagasan mahasiswa sendiri (Ene, 2006) seperti memetakan suatu topik menjadi sub-topik yang mudah dijelaskan, pengelompokan objek tertentu untuk dijadikan topik, kemudian mengeditnya dan tentunya dapat memilih kosakat-kosakata yang sesuai dengan topiknya (Chengping W, 2008).Kata Kunci: pemanfaatan media, pembelajaran sains
JPE (Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama) Vol. 5 No. 1 Januari 2018
P-ISSN : 2339-2258 (Print) E-ISSN: 2548-821X (Online)
http://ejurnal.ikippgribojonegoro.ac.id/index.php/JPE
9
LEARNER AUTONOMY ON ESSAY WRITING ACCURACY
Moh. Hafidz
Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, STKIP PGRI Bangkalan
email: mohhafidz@stkippgri-bkl.ac.id
Abstract :Learner autonomy on writing is independently teaching and learnin that keeps
students’ control to explore their knowledge and experiences in written language, find out
and avaluate their errors based on the conceptual courses to make accurately simple
essay. The aim was to know the effectiveess of the learner autonomy on writing accuracy.
This quatitative research conducted in one group pretest and postes design. The number
of sample was 21 students in Bangkalan. The instrument were tests to gain students’
writing score before and after treatment. Researcher statistically analyzed the data using
SPSS 23 version by running a Paired Samples Test. The result shown the means of pretes
score was 66,83 and posttes score was 74,57, Paired Samples Correlations was 0,614
(strong correlation). Significance was 0,005, it means that
(0,05) is higher than
value (0,005) with high variance of mean value (14,091). As a result, the hypothesis (H1)
was recepted that learner autonomy contributed effectively to learners’ in organizing own
ideas (Ene, 2006) such as making a topic map becomes some explanable sub-topics,
writing down main and supporting idea, clustering some objects, editing next and
learners absolutey accumulate some selected vocabularies in appropriate topics
(Chengping W, 2008).
Keyword: Learner Autonomy, Learning process, outcomes
Absrak: Pembelajaran otonomi adalah pembelajaran mandiri yang mengontrol
mahasiswa untuk menyampaikan gagasan dan pengalamannya, mencatat dan
mengevaluasi kesalahan yang terjadi dalam penulisan esai sederhana berdasarkan
pembelajaran yang tersetruktur. Tujuaa adala untuk mengetahui efektifitas pembelajaran
otonomi terhadap akurasi tulisan secara statistic. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan
menggunakan desain tes awal dan akhir. Jumlah sampel terdiri dari 21 siswa di
Bangkalan. Isntrumen yang digunakan adalah tes untuk mengetahui hasil nilai
mahasiswa sebelum dan sesudah melakukan pembelajaran otonomi. Peneliti menganalisa
data dengan menggunakan versi SPSS 23 dengan menggunakan sampel tes yang
berpasangan. Hasil rata-rata tes awal adalah 66,83 dan tes akhir adalah 74,57, dengan
corelasi sampel berpasangannya adalah 0,614 (kuat). Sedangkan signifikansinya adalah
0,005, artinya
(0,05) lebih besar daripada
value (0,005) dengan varian nilai rata-
rata yang tinggi (14,091). Hasil hipotesis (H1)-nya diterima bahwa pembelajara otonomi
berkontribusi secara efektif terhadap pengorganisasian gagasan mahasiswa sendiri (Ene,
2006) seperti memetakan suatu topik menjadi sub-topik yang mudah dijelaskan,
pengelompokan objek tertentu untuk dijadikan topik, kemudian mengeditnya dan tentunya
dapat memilih kosakat-kosakata yang sesuai dengan topiknya (Chengping W, 2008).
Kata kunci: Pembelajaran otonomi, proses pembelajaran, hasil
INTRODUCTION
Writing is behavioral process to
deliver some written messages in
mechanical products (Langan, 2010).
Writing as skill absolutely requires habitual
acts to force a writing competence through
student’s leraning activities. The basics
cocepts on writing are type, purpose and
length. The first, type is ditermining the
writing format such as letter, notes, report,
project, essay, thesis or disertation and
article or paper. The second, purpose is an
aim of the final products, those are formal
or informal information. The last, lenght is
number of words which suits with type’s
necessity (Bailey, 2003). Maesuring this
10 JURNAL PENDIDIKAN EDUTAMA, Vol.5, No.1 Januari 2018
concept (Hogue, 2007) assesses essay
writing aspects through format,
punctuaition and mechanics, content,
organization, grammar and sentence
structure.
Furthermore, this basic writing
concept conducted in leaning autonomy
when the students are conciousely believe
that their skill, knowledge, experience and
environment support to develop writing
skill (Vazquez, 2015). This statement
stresses on the student’s control and
responsibily which learning adjusts the
student’s writing competence. On his
journal, Illes (2015) argues:
“when developing LA, the
emphasis should shift from aspects
related to the learning process (e.g.
setting learning objectives,
monitoring learning, evaluating
learning outcomes, etc.) to
communicative processes since the
teacher’s main concern should be to
develop learners’ autonomy as
language users”
It means that students are able to
transfer the own kognitive aspect and
formulate the own surrounding facts in
written message (William, 2003), the
students understand the material, target and
appropriate strategy while learning process.
Moreover, students due to the competence
based and get more responsibilities to
enhance their result tasks in the own rules
and determine some choices which need
evaluation or the final written product
(Ahmadzadeh, 2014).
In language teaching process (Al-
Busaidi, 2012), professional language
learner autonomy fulfills some characterics
such autonomy is a construct of capacity,
autonomy involves a willingness on the part
of the learner to take responsibility for their
own learning, the capacity and willingness
of learners to take such responsibility is not
necessarily innate, complete autonomy is an
idealistic goal, there are degrees of
autonomy, the degrees of autonomy are
unstable and variable, autonomy is not
simply a matter of placing learners in
situations where they have to be
independent, developing autonomy requires
conscious, awareness of the learning
process i.e. conscious reflection and
decision-making, promoting autonomy is
not simply a matter of teaching strategies,
autonomy can take place both inside and
outside the classroom, autonomy has a
social as well as an individual dimension,
the promotion of autonomy has a political
as well as psychological dimension,
autonomy is interpreted differently by
different cultures.
Learning aoutonomy does not as
simply as teacher center learning which the
teacher is more dominant in learning, the
students take appluse to the teacher’s
activities and understimate their skill,
knowledge, experiences eventhough neglect
the power of environment, learner
autonomy conceptualized in students’
classroom situation which disting to other
ones, are: students manage in their own
class, students do based on their skill,
students’ innate ability is supported by
classroom instruction, students are
evaluated for their process, student’s chose
their learning porpuses (David Nunan,
2003).
So, all of student’s ctivities are
dependent and the learning outcomes are
out of learning set because the students can
not explore their ability and imatate the
innovative ones out of the classroom.
Studetns’ background knowledges
determine the own process of learnig
specially on te results of writing skill
products.
Motivating structurally the
autonomous student’s ideas and creativities
conducts a suite approach such as workshop
Hafidz, Learner Outonomy on……………… 11
which focuses on discovery based
approach, this approach drills students’ skill
more active than teacher learning center,
because the teacher encourage students to
due some activities that related with learner
autonomy concept o writing. Ray (2001)
states:
“Basically, a writing workshop
consists of three components: (1) a
15-minute mini lesson; (2)
approximately 20 minutes of
independent student writing; and
(3) 10 minutes of some form of
sharing to wrap up the workshop.
......”
In early meeting of writing class,
some learners were scary when the
researcher was asking them to write in free
writing at home. The next, All of students
fulfilled the tasks in vary formats, content,
and orgnanization. The students who
submitted the product (free writing) are
absolutely the writer because they are able
to describe the fact in written text,
moreover they are not a novelist or
journalist (William, 2003). Learners writing
skill appears when researcher asked them to
mention their writing products such as
diary, short story and writing portofolios.
Researcher intended to due an
effective learning through learner
autonomy. Learner autonomy is
conceptualized independently teaching and
learnin that keeps students’ control to
actualize their own knowledge and
experiences, take notes and avaluate their
own faults themselves (Ene, 2006). Learner
autonomy makes students are more active
than teacher. Moreover, the teacher
acquires some rules to conduct teaching and
learning in and out of the class which bases
on students activities. The teacher is not
fasilitator only, but also manager. Students
process of actualizing their idea into written
format absolutely have own technique
which empowers their knowledge and
experiences while they are writing some
topics.
In contrast, Learner autonomy that
investigated in West Anhui University
found some unpleased results such as the
lack of students vocabularies, unappropriate
subject and different understanding
between teacher and students (Chengping
W, 2008). This indicates that learner
autonomy is not as simple as dependent
learning which most of teachers assume
that student’s knowledge is on the teacher’s
authorized which all of student’s written
products are their responsibility to be
evaluated and corrected (Kulsirisawad,
2012) then, published to the students in
order to find out their written faults.
METHODOLOGY
A total participants of this research
were 30 students in Bangkalan. The
participants were from different graduation
background such as senior high school was
34%, vocational school 33% and islamic
senior high school 33%. The everage of
participants english score was 7,0 and took
English language teachers. Paired Samples
test was used in this research. Instrument of
this research is test (Darmadi, 2014) to
investigate the learner autonomy of the
subjects, the tes was designed which consits
of format (5 points), punctuaition and
mechanics (5 points), content (20 points),
organization (35 points), grammar and
sentence structure (35 points) (Alice
Oshima, 2007).
The data are gained from prepared
test (pre-test) to know the participants
writing skill by one group pretest posttest
design (Creswell, 2009). The purpose of
this study is to identify learner autonomy
contribute to the students’ essay writing
accuracy. Further, learning autonomy
applied in workshop approach which
students got 10 treatments and 4 exercises,
12 JURNAL PENDIDIKAN EDUTAMA, Vol.5, No.1 Januari 2018
those devided in two assessments were
individual and peer assessments. Own
assessments conducted after training then
made an essay and evaluated by theirselves,
peer assessments due to make an essay
than, evaluated by their patner end gaving
back after corrrecting.
To get information of student’s
achievement, reseacher tested participants
(post-tes) to make an essay and submitted it
to know the learner autonomy effects on
essay writing aspects, researcher used a
statistical technique was used to identify
whether the mean and standards error of
mean and standard deviation of the test.
The test was standardised by Oshimas
creterias which used in English language
learning.
DISCUSSION
The data currently were obtained
from a pretest and posttest. Pretest early
conducted to measure the learner’s writing
ability before threatment class. In the class,
learner’s autonomy applied to threat the
learner as long as learning process
including learner’s activities, individual or
group work tasks and final test. Posttest
was gained from final test to measure the
the learner’s autonomy contributed
statistically on learners’ essay writing
accuracy. The result of
Pretest and posttest designed and
calculated based on Oshimas scoring
rubrics. Statiscal analyzed data was SPSS
23 version by running a Paired Samples
Test. The result of this analyze to answer
the tentatively hypothesis that learners’
authonomy contributes signifcantly on
learners’ essay writing accuracy. In
addition, if the learners have higher score
after the treatment class, the hypothesis
(H1) is recepted and H0 is rejected in
contrast.
Testing the hypothesis
The hypothesis was tested in Paired
Samples Test to analyze the result of pretest
and postest statistically after computing
both scores (table.3).
Table 1. Describing the Statisticcally Paired Samples of Learner Autonomy Contribute to the
Students’ Essay Writing Accuracy
Paired Samples Statistics indicates
the mean of pretes score is 66,83 and
posttes score is 74,57. So, posttest score is
higher than posttest.
Paired Samples Statistics
Mean
N
Std.
Deviatio
n
Std.
Error
Mean
Prete
st
66,83
30
17,835
3,256
Poste
st
74,57
30
11,628
2,123
Hafidz, Learner Outonomy on……………… 13
Table 2 Describing the Paired Samples Correlations of Learner Autonomy Contribute to the
Students’ Essay Writing Accuracy.
Paired Samples Correlations shows
that both pretest and posttes has stongly
correlation after applying Learner
Autonomy in treatmen class. The table 2
points out 0,614.
Table 3 Describing the Paired Samples Test of Learner Autonomy Contribute to the Students’
Essay Writing Accuracy.
Paired Samples Test is statistically
design to analyze the pretest and postest
result after threatmen class. The table 3 in
Sig. (2-tailed) column shows 0,005, it
means that learner autonomy contributes
signficantly to the students’ essay writing
accuracy. In other words, (0,05) is higher
than value (0,005) with high variance of
mean value which pointed it out in standard
deviation coloumn is 14,091. As a result,
the hypothesis (H1) is recepted.
Learner autonomy is learner-centred
approach to language teaching (David
Nunan, 2003) contribute effectively to
learners’ in organizing alternatively own
ideas (Ene, 2006) because the learners are
able to make a topic map becomes some
explanable sub-topics and chose the
selected ones which support to the
structurally paragraphs becomes simple
essay which completely arranged in outline
format (Langan, 2010).
The content of essay, the learners
trained to discuss, analyze, write and edit
(in peer) the interesting topics (Ray, 2001),
the learners have unique and various
knowledge and experience to explore their
ideas in written language because of their
variety writing technique such as writing
down main idea and supporting idea of the
essay title, clustering some objects based on
the title and directly writing an essay by
editing next.
Training class conducted to manage
the situation (David Nunan, 2003) that
learners are formal writers (Bailey, 2003),
(William, 2003) who communicate in
written language (Illes, 2015) especially in
essay type. This type requires accurately
information to make readers easily
Paired Samples Correlations
N
Correlati
on
Sig.
Pair
1
Pretest &
Postest
30
,614
,000
Paired Samples Test
Paired Differences
T
df
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean
Std.
Deviation
Std. Error
Mean
95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
Lower
Upper
Pair 1
Pret
est
Post
est
-7,733
14,091
2,573
-12,995
-2,472
-3,006
29
,005
14 JURNAL PENDIDIKAN EDUTAMA, Vol.5, No.1 Januari 2018
understand. Moreover, learners absolutey
accumulate some selected sufficient
vocabularies in actual and appropriate
topics (Chengping W, 2008). Students
vocabularies are more daily words that
utilized in sentences and pragraph.
CONCLUSION
Learner autonomy contributes
effectively on essay writing accuracy by
providing the means of pretes score was
66,83 and posttes score was 74,57, Paired
Samples Correlations was 0,614 (strong
correlation). Significance was 0,005, it
means that (0,05) is higher than value
(0,005) with high variance of mean value
(14,091). As a result, the hypothesis (H1)
was recepted that learner autonomy
contributed effectively to learners’ in
organizing alternatively own ideas (Ene,
2006) such as make a topic map becomes
some explanable sub-topics, writing down
main and supporting idea, clustering some
objects, editing next and learners absolutey
accumulate some selected vocabularies in
actual and appropriate topics (Chengping
W, 2008).
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ahmadzadeh, R. (2014). Learner
Autonomy in Practice.
International Journal on New
Trends in Education and Their
Implications , 54-55.
Al-Busaidi, S. B. (2012). Learner
Autonomy: English Language
Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices.
UK: British Council.
Alice Oshima, A. H. (2007).
Introduction to Academic Writing.
United Stated of America:
Longman.
Bailey, S. (2003). Academic Writing A
Practical Guide for Students.
New York: Routledge Falmer
Taylor & Francis Group.
Chengping W, R. H. (2008). Net-Based
Learner Autonomy, Its Problems
and Possible Solutions-A Case
Study in WAHU, China. English
Language Teaching , 108-110.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Qualitative,
Quantitative, and Mixed Method
Approach. California: Sage.
Darmadi, H. (2014). Metode Penelitian
Pendidikan dan Sosial Teori dan
Konsep. Bandung: Alfabeta.
David Nunan, J. C. (2003). English As
A Second Or Foreign Language.
London: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
Ene, C. H. (2006). Grammatical
Accuracy and Learner Autonomy
in Advanced Writing. ELT
Journal , 1.
Hogue, A. O. (2007). Introduction to
Academic Writing. United States
of America: Longman.
Kulsirisawad, P. (2012). Developing
Learner Autonomy in EFL
Writing Classrooms via Peer
Feedback. CULI National
Seminar (pp. 3-5). Bangkok:
Chulalongkorn University
Language Institute.
Hafidz, Learner Outonomy on ……………… 15
Langan, J. (2010). Exploring Writing
Sentences and Paragraphs. New
York: Connect Learn Succed.
Vazquez, B. M. (2015). Learner
Autonomy as a Defensible
Educational Goal in Modern
Language Education. Journal of
English and Spanish Studies ,
101-102.
William, J. D. (2003). Preparing to
Teach riting: Research, Theory
and Practice. New Jersey:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16 JURNAL PENDIDIKAN EDUTAMA, Vol.5, No.1 Januari 2018
... Second, research by Mardiyah (2018) shows that autonomy in learning improves the reading ability of Mochammad Husni Thamrin University students in Jakarta. Third, research by Hafidz (2018) also proves that learning autonomy is effective at increasing accuracy in writing essays. The three studies link self-assessment and learning autonomy with increased proficiency in language skills. ...
Article
Full-text available
The objective of this research is to describe how the use of self-assessment could improve learners’ autonomy. This study employed an action research design involving freshmen of English Education Study Program University of Bengkulu as the subject of the research. This action research was conducted in the Intensive English Course. The cycle of research consisted of plan, action, observation, and reflection. The cycle consisted of fifteen meetings covering four themes of materials. During the meetings, students were instructed to do self-assessment guided by the instructor after they have finished learning each theme. The indicator of success for this research was at least 25% students were categorized as having Very High level of autonomy, while the rest were at High level of autonomy. To measure the level of learners’ autonomy, a questionnaire was used. The questionnaire covers nine aspects of autonomy with the total fifty items. It was given to the subject at the end of the cycle. From the analyzed data, it was found that after only conducting one cycle of the action research, the indicator of success in this research was achieved. Hence, there was no need to continue it to the second cycle. From the result, 30% of students were categorized as having Very High Learning Autonomy.
Article
Full-text available
Abstrak: Grammatical or sound variety in scientific writing (Academic Voices) is a method used by writers to convey their own ideas and other people's ideas in the standard of scientific writing both in the form of Writer's Voice, Direct Voice, Voice indirect (Indirect Voice), additional voice (External Voice). The purpose of this study is to improve the ability of writers about quotations, to distinguish writers' voice, direct voice, indirect voice and external voice and reduce the level of plagiarism in writing journal articles. This study uses research in the form of Electronic Literature Study (E-Library Research) using observation and documentation. The result is 90% (ninety percent) of authors use author's voice (Writer's Voice) rather than direct voice (Direct Voice), indirect voice (Indirect Voice), additional voice (External Voice) in E-journal, formality of writing style scientific works are very varied and e-mail address (e-mail) is one of the conditions for the publication of articles as scientific papers. Kata kunci: Grammatical or Sound Variety (Academic Voices), Quotation and E-Journal Pendahuluan Ragam gramatikal atau suara dalam karya tulis ilmiah (academic voices) sangat luas definisinya tetapi peneliti hanya mendefinisikan bahwa suara (voice) adalah ungkapan yang disampaikan melalui tulisan atau bacaan dengan menggunakan kiasan dari sumber pribadi maupun sumber lain (Davina, 2015). Definisi ini lebih memfokuskan penggunaan ragam gramatikal yang dibutuhkan penulis dalam menulis artikel ilmiah. Artikel ilmiah adalah salah satu syarat untuk memenuhi kelulusan di dunia akademik, syarat ini menuntut penulis untuk menulis sesuai dengan kaidah penulisan karya ilmiah. Penulisan artikel ilmiah membutuhkan keterampilan menulis yang khas untuk menghasilkan artikel yang bermutu dan menarik (Bali, 2017). Penulis mempunyai cara masing-masing untuk mengungkapkan suara atau ragam gramatikal (academic voices) meskipun mengalami kesulitan karena hal ini sangat personal dan tergantung pada waktu dan tujuan penulis
Article
Full-text available
Grammatical or sound variety in scientific writing (Academic Voices) is a method used by writers to convey their own ideas and other people's ideas in the standard of scientific writing both in the form of Writer's Voice, Direct Voice, Voice indirect (Indirect Voice), additional voice (External Voice). The purpose of this study is to improve the ability of writers about quotations, to distinguish writers' voice, direct voice, indirect voice and external voice and reduce the level of plagiarism in writing journal articles. This study uses research in the form of Electronic Literature Study (E-Library Research) using observation and documentation. The result is 90% (ninety percent) of authors use author's voice (Writer's Voice) rather than direct voice (Direct Voice), indirect voice (Indirect Voice), additional voice (External Voice) in E-journal, formality of writing style scientific works are very varied and e-mail address (e-mail) is one of the conditions for the publication of articles as scientific papers.
Article
Full-text available
This questionnaire study examined the beliefs, practices and constraints related to learner autonomy reported by 359 teachers (mainly expatriate) working on an English Preparatory Year Programme (PYP) at a university in Saudi Arabia. The teachers associated learner autonomy primarily with notions of independence and control and saw it as the ability and motivation to complete tasks, individually and/or collaboratively, in and/or outside the classroom, and with no/little teacher involvement. They believed that promoting learner autonomy was a desirable goal and described how they tried to achieve this goal in their teaching. Most were, however, less positive about the feasibility of promoting learner autonomy and explained this in relation to curricular, societal and, above all, learner factors (such as lack of motivation and independence and low proficiency in English). In discussing these findings, several avenues for further research are identified and through which teachers’ conceptualizations of learner autonomy can be understood using mixed methods research and with reference to a range of socio-cultural, intercultural, professional, occupational and institutional forces.
Article
Full-text available
The notion of learner autonomy has become a central pillar of education over the last years (see Lamb and Reinders, 2008; Vieira, 2009; or Benson, 2011). However, despite the general agreement on the importance of promoting autonomous learning in the school context, there are voices that question whether it is a feasible and desirable goal so as to be pursued in the classroom (e.g. Cuypers, 1992; Pennycook, 1997; Hand, 2006). The purpose of the present paper is to discuss why learner autonomy constitutes a defensible educational goal in education and, more specifically, in modern language education. Thus, the paper begins by reviewing some of the most relevant definitions of learner autonomy in the specialised literature. Next, it moves on to examine some of the main criticisms which have been levelled against this concept. It concludes by considering different reasons which support the significance of learner autonomy in language education.
Article
Full-text available
The paper presents a study investigating the net-based learner autonomy of the first-year non-English major students studying in West Anhui University (WAHU). Through questionnaires and interviews, the study shows the problems in learner autonomy and presents a new perspective for the development of an auto-learning environment. The study reveals that students had difficulty adapting to net-based learning mode. Some proposals that the college, teachers and students could unite to tackle the problems in learning have been put forth as the solutions to the problems.
Article
Full-text available
This paper aims to explore advanced ESL learners' ability to make improvements in grammatical accuracy by autonomously noticing and correcting their own grammatical errors. In the recent literature in SLA, it is suggested that classroom tasks can be used to foster autonomous language learning habits (cf. Dam 2001). Therefore, it is important to consider classroom tasks that encourage autonomous language learning behaviour. Working with 13 advanced ESL composition students, we engaged the subjects in an explicit task in which they compared their own use of grammatical form in their own written output to the use of grammatical form as used in a text written by a native speaker. Based on the comparison between their own written output and the native speaker text, subjects subsequently corrected their grammatical errors. Results suggest that such a comparison task is beneficial in allowing learners to make gains in grammatical accuracy.
Book
Preparing to Teach Writing, Fourth Edition is a comprehensive survey of theories, research, and methods associated with teaching composition successfully at the middle, secondary, and college levels. Research and theory are examined with the aim of informing teaching. Practicing and prospective writing teachers need the information and strategies this text provides to be effective and well prepared for the many challenges they will face in the classroom. Features • Current-combines discussions and references to foundational studies that helped define the field of rhetoric and composition, with updated research, theories, and applications • Research based-thorough examination of relevant research in education, literacy, cognition, linguistics, and grammar • Steadfast adherence to best practices based on how students learn and on how to provide the most effective writing instruction • A Companion Website provides sample assignments and student papers that can be analyzed using the research and theory presented in the text.
Introduction to Academic Writing. United Stated of America: Longman
  • Alice Oshima
Alice Oshima, A. H. (2007). Introduction to Academic Writing. United Stated of America: Longman.
Metode Penelitian Pendidikan dan Sosial Teori dan Konsep
  • H Darmadi
Darmadi, H. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan dan Sosial Teori dan Konsep. Bandung: Alfabeta.
English As A Second Or Foreign Language
  • J C David Nunan
David Nunan, J. C. (2003). English As A Second Or Foreign Language. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd.