... Chipped stone flakes, bifacial thinning flakes, and irregularly shaped chunks or blocky fragments have been used as tools throughout the entirety of Maya existence, extending from preceramic (e.g., Stemp and Harrison-Buck 2019) to contemporary times (e.g., Hayden and Nelson 1981; see Deal and Hayden 1987 for glass). Documented use of debitage as tools can be associated with small, mobile or semi-sedentary pre-Maya foraging populations in the lowlands (Stemp and Harrison-Buck 2019; see Rosenswig et al. 2014 for utilized flakes), the populous, sedentary, hierarchically organized, state-level societies of the Preclassic, Classic, and Postclassic periods (e.g., Aldenderfer 1991;Aldenderfer et al. 1989;Aoyama 1999Aoyama , 2009Graham 1994;Lewenstein 1987;Sievert 1992;Stemp 2001Stemp , 2004Stemp and Graham 2006;Stemp et al. 2010Stemp et al. , 2013Stemp et al., 2018c), and the Maya communities that persisted into Colonial times (Stemp 2001(Stemp , 2004(Stemp , 2016; see Oland 2013 for utilized flakes). From a global archaeological perspective, common explanations for the use of formal and curated versus informal and expedient technology have incorporated discussions of mobility versus sedentism, the ability to stockpile raw material in anticipation of use, local versus non-local access to raw material, the overall knapping quality of lithic raw material, knapping skill, time commitments, the time-cost of different reduction strategies, the scheduling of activities, the need or lack thereof for specialized or task-specific tools, and tool efficiency, among others (Andrefsky 1994(Andrefsky , 2009Bamforth 1986;Binford 1977Binford , 1979Bleed 1986;Bousman 1993;Kelly 1988;McCall 2012;McAnany 1988;Nelson 1991;Parry and Kelly 1987;Shott 2018;Tomka 2001;Torrence 1983Torrence , 1989. ...