Content uploaded by Radek Stocek
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Radek Stocek on Mar 20, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
Content uploaded by Radek Stocek
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Radek Stocek on Mar 20, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
tread compound candidates.
The CC phenomenon is complex, yet traditional CC test meth-
ods for the rubber laboratory employ simple, non-instrumented
devices where sample weight loss is the only measurement (refs.
1-4). This article describes a new laboratory instrument for char-
acterization of CC behavior which has several test conditions that
can be independently controlled. It measures multiple force and
displacement data channels during testing of rubber specimens.
The testing principle and typical results for model rubber com-
pounds that are typical of tire tread applications will be discussed.
In particular, the methodology which can predict actual CC rank-
ings for tires from laboratory testing of tread compounds will be
highlighted.
Experimental details
Polymers used in this study were natural rubber (NR; SMR CV
60) and high cis butadiene rubber (BR; Buna CB 24 from Ar-
lanxeo). The reinforcing filler was an N339 grade of carbon black
(CB). All other ingredients were rubber grade chemicals. The
rubber formulations are given in table 1.
Rubber compounds were prepared in two mixing stages. For
the first stage, all ingredients except CBS accelerator and sulfur
were mixed for five minutes in an internal mixer (SYD-2L from
Everplast, Taiwan) at 50 rpm with a chamber wall temperature of
80°C. The CBS and sulfur curatives were added in the second
mixing stage on a two-roll mill at a temperature of 60°C.
Curing properties were determined by a moving die rheometer
(MDR 3000 Basic, MonTech, Germany) according to ASTM
6204 at 160°C. Rubber specimens with an outer diameter of 55
mm and thickness of 13 mm (see geometry shown in figure 2)
were cured in a heated press (LaBEcon 300, Fontijne Presses,
Netherlands) at 160°C according to the curing time t90 + 1 minute
per 1 mm of the thickness (13 minutes total added for specimen
thickness of 13 mm).
Laboratory chip and cut testing was performed on the rubber
specimens using an instrumented chip and cut analyzer (ref. 5)
(ICCATM) manufactured by Coesfeld GmbH, Germany (figure
2), and distributed in the Americas by Endurica LLC, USA. The
Characterizing rubber's resistance against
chip and cut behavior
E\ 5DGHN 6WRþHN 35/ 3RO\PHU 5HVHDUFK /DERUDWRU\ DQG
7RPDV%DWD 8QLYHUVLW\&]HFK5HSXEOLF:LOOLDP90DUVDQG
&KULVWRSKHU* 5REHUWVRQ(QGXULFD//&DQG5HLQKROG.LS-
VFKROO&RHVIHOG*PE+&R.**HUPDQ\
Cutting and chipping of tread rubber is a significant concern for
tires that are used in off-road or poor road conditions, where the
tires are in contact with gravel, rocks and uneven road surfaces.
Some examples of cut and chip (CC) damage to tire treads are
illustrated in figure 1. Due to the usual difficulty in predicting CC
resistance of tire treads from laboratory testing of rubber com-
pounds, it is often necessary to resort to expensive development
programs involving iterative tire building and field testing of new
38 RUBBERWORLD.COM JANUARY 2018
Figure 2 - photograph of instrumented chip
and cut analyzer (ICCA) showing expanded
view of impacting device and sample (left)
and diagram of rubber sample geometry
with 55 mm outer diameter and 13 mm
thickness (right)
Ø 26
Ø 55
Figure 1 - examples of various extents of
chip and cut damage to the treads of: TBR/
heavy truck tires (a) and (b); OTR/
construction vehicle tire (c); and mud-
terrain light truck tire (d)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Table 1 - rubber formulations
NR
BR
CB (N339)
Zinc oxide
Stearic acid
IPPD(a)
CBS(b)
Sulfur
NR/BR 50CB
75
25
50
3
1
1.5
2.5
1.7
NR/BR 65CB
75
25
65
3
1
1.5
2.5
1.7
(a) N-isopropyl-N’-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine
(b) N-cyclohexyl-2-benzothiazole sulfonamide
ed rotation speed and striking the sample with a stainless steel
impactor at a given frequency. The impact is produced using a
pneumatic cylinder, where the impact normal force, frequency
and contact (sliding) time with the rubber surface can all be sepa-
rately controlled. A schematic of the impacting device is shown in
figure 3, the impactor geometry is described in figure 4, and an
example of the data generated for each impact event is presented
in figure 5. The types of parameter inputs and outputs, along with
their ranges, are summarized in table 2, which emphasizes the
highly instrumented and flexible nature of the testing equipment.
One key characterization factor that is evaluated from the
multi-channel data acquisition is the chip and cut propensity, P.
The parameter P is determined from integrating the fluctuations in
friction force, related to roughness of the damaged surface, over a
number of impact cycles. The P value of tread compounds was
proven to be a very good predictor of actual tire cut and chip field
test results for a variety of agricultural tires, truck and bus radial
(TBR) tires, and light truck tires. The details cannot be shared due
to confidentiality considerations with major tire manufacturers.
The cut and chip behavior as a function of number of impact
ICCA equipment and test-
ing approach will be fur-
ther described in the next
section. Samples were
tested at a rotation speed
of 150 rpm, normal force
of 125 N, impact frequen-
cy of 5 Hz, and sliding
time of 30 ms for a varied
number of cycles.
Results and discussion
The principle of measure-
ment for the instrumented
chip and cut analyzer in-
volves rotating the round
rubber sample at a select-
FOLLOW US ON TWITTER @rubberworld 39
Figure 3 - schematic of ICCA measuring
principle, with: pneumatic actuator (1); two-
axis load cell (2); holder plus impactor (3);
and round rubber test sample (4)
Ff
Fn
ai
Z
123 4
Figure 5 - general graph showing multi-
channel data collection for one impact
loading cycle of ICCA measurement
Time of sliding, ts
Time
Normal force, fn
Force
Normal force
Friction force
Table 2 - list of parameters for the instrumented chip and cut analyzer
(ICCA)
Parameter
Rotation speed, Ȧ
Impact frequency, f
Number of impact cycles, n
Time of sliding, ts
Normal force, Fn
Friction force, Ff
Resulting force, Fc
Depth of indentation, ai
Friction distance, af
Normal energy, En
Friction energy, Ef
Friction coefficient, cf
Chip and cut propensity, P
Range
100 to 1,500
0 to 10
0 to undefined
20 to permanent
0 to 500
0 to 900
Calculated
0 to 20
Measured
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Unit
rpm
Hz
-
ms
N
N
N
mm
mm
J
J
-
N/cycle
Defined
¥
¥
¥
¥
¥
Parameter type
Measured
¥
¥
¥
¥
¥
¥
¥
¥
Controlled
¥
¥
¥
¥
¥
Calculated
¥
¥
¥
¥
¥
Figure 4 - geometry of the stainless steel
impactor tool; the width of the impactor is
6.35 mm,which strikes the middle of the
13 mm thick rubber sample
Ra 0.8
Ra 0.8
R5
R2.5
Ra 0.8
60°
9.61
R0.8
16.55
R1
Ra 0.8
19.05
6.35
cycles was compared for two blend compounds: NR/BR 50CB
and NR/BR 65CB (see formulations in table 1). The results are
presented in figures 6 and 7. The slope of the P versus n data
shows very distinct values for the two materials. A greater slope
is associated with less CC resistance. Inspection of the rubber
specimen surfaces and the flat response of P with increasing num-
ber of cycles for the NR/BR 65CB compound both show that no
significant chipping of rubber was evident for this material which
was reinforced with a significantly higher amount of carbon black
compared to the NR/BR 50CB compound, which showed clear
CC damage.
The development of cutting patterns on the rubber surfaces,
and the related chipping away of material that follows, show dis-
tinct characteristics that depend on normal load (not shown here),
number of impact cycles, and especially the rubber formulation
(figure 6). Along with the P values, such differences in visual
damage responses from cyclic impact reveal that the ICCA can
effectively distinguish the CC behavior of different rubber com-
pounds.
Conclusion
The instrumented chip and cut analyzer is a new test device for
the rubber laboratory that controls and records multiple applied
loads and displacements during cyclic impact to mimic and quan-
tify the cut and chip damage experienced by tire tread compounds
on rough terrain. The surface roughness characteristics of the
rubber specimens, created from the repetitive impacting process,
produce fluctuations in the friction force that are quantified using
the P parameter, thus allowing evaluation of the CC tendency of
rubber compounds in the laboratory to predict CC behavior of tire
treads in service.
Abrasion of rubber involves both mechanical fracture and
thermal-oxidative effects (aging/degradation) (ref. 6). Consider-
ing the latter, impact-induced localized temperature increases of
the rubber during ICCA testing are of interest, and a study was
conducted to investigate this using a high speed, thermal imaging
camera. These preliminary results were shown during the presen-
tation of this paper at the 192nd Meeting of the Rubber Division,
ACS, in October 2017.
In addition to cyclic impact, the ICCA can also be used in full
contact mode as a friction and wear measurement device. This is
an area of ongoing research with this flexible instrument.
References
1. J. Beatty and B. Miksch, “A laboratory cutting and chipping
tester for evaluation of off-the-road and heavy duty tire treads,”
Rubber Chem. Technol. 55, 1,531 (1982).
2. C. Nah, B.W. Jo and S. Kaang, “Cut and chip resistance of
NR-BR blend compounds,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 68, 1,537 (1998).
3. M. Scherbakov and M.R. Gurvich, “A method of wear charac-
terization under cut, chip and chunk conditions,” J. Elastom.
Plast. 35, 73 (2003).
4. J.-H. Ma, Y.-X. Wang, L.-Q. Zhang and Y.-P. Wu, “Improvement
of cutting and chipping resistance of carbon black-filled styrene
butadiene rubber by addition of nanodispersed clay,” J. Appl.
Polym. Sci. 125, 3,484 (2012).
((XFKOHU + 0LFKDHO0*HKGH2 .UDWLQD 56WRþHN5
Kipscholl and J.-M. Bunzel, “Wear of technical rubber materials
under cyclic impact loading conditions,” Kautsch. Gummi
Kunstst. 69, 22 (2016).
6. A.N. Gent and C.T.R. Pulford, “Mechanisms of rubber abra-
sion,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 28, 943 (1983).
40 RUBBERWORLD.COM JANUARY 2018
Figure 6 - topology of the abraded surfaces
for the NR/BR 65CB and NR/BR 50CB
compounds after testing using loading
conditions described in the text for the
indicated number of impact cycles
Number of impact cycles, n
1,000
2,500
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
1,000
2,500
5,000
NR/BR 65CB NR/BR 50CB
Figure 7 - effect of number of impact cycles
on P for the NR/BR 65CB and NR/BR 50CB
compounds using conditions described in
the text
Parameter P (N/cycles)
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000
Cycles, n
NR/BR 65CB
NR/BR 50CB
Coming March 2018
Annual Custom Mixing & Custom Services Issue