Some notes on phylogenetic view-points may be added here. In quite a few species, a very irregular distribution of the stomata could be observed. Stomata were neither united in groups nor were they distributed homogeneously over the surface, but appeared here and there leaving parts of the surface completely free. Besides, they varied very much in size, the majority appearing in a normal size,
... [Show full abstract] while very large stomata were often confined to the ribs, occurring in their closest vicinity or above them. This irregular distribution is considered more primitive than a regular arrangement of stomata. Most regular and highest developed is, certainly, the arrangement of stomata in holes or crypts. Eventually, stomata occurred first on both leaf surfaces and only later were confined to the lower surface. However, species where stomata also occur on the upper side are very infrequent in the studied material. The very large stomata which often are distinguished from the regular ones by their staining affinities may eventually serve as hydathodes. In any case, it is very surprising how many tropical species develop stomata of different size, some of the larger stomata reaching a considerable length and width. Likewise, a discontinuous irregular hypodermis formation suggests a ‘neoformation’ from the phylogenetic point of view.