Content uploaded by C.Jaya Subba Reddy
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by C.Jaya Subba Reddy on Jan 29, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
Annals of Pure and Applied Mathematics
Vol. 16, No. 1, 2018, 127-131
ISSN: 2279-087X (P), 2279-0888(online)
Published on 5 January 2018
www.researchmathsci.org
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22457/apam.v16n1a14
127
Annals of
Left Generalized Derivations on Prime Γ-Rings
C. Jaya Subba Reddy
1
, K. Nagesh
2
and A. Sivakameshwara Kumar
3
1
Department of Mathematics, Sri Venkateswara University
Tirupati-517502, India. E-mail: cjsreddysvu@gmail.com
2
Department of Mathematics, Rayalaseema University
Kurnool, Andhrapradesh, India. E-mail: nagesh.kunda100@gmail.com
3
Department of Mathematics, Rayalaseema University
Kurnool, Andhrapradesh, India. E-mail: kamesh1069@gmail.com
Received 6 December 2017; accepted 26 December 2017
Abstract. Let be a prime -ring with 2-torsion free, a nonzero ideal of M and
a left generalized derivation of , with associated nonzero derivation d on .
If for all , then is a commutative -ring.
Keywords: Gamma ring, prime gamma ring, derivation, generalized derivation, left
generalized derivation, commutators.
AMS Mathematics Subject Classification (2010): 06F25
1. Introduction
The notion of -ring was first introduction by Nobusawa [9] and also shown that -ring,
more general than rings. Barnes [1] slightly weakened the conditions in the definitions of
a -rings in the sense of Nobusawa. After the study of -rings by Nobusawa [9] and
Barnes [1], many researchers have a done lot of work and have obtained some
generalizations of the corresponding results in ring theory [6][8]. Barnes [1] and kyuno
[8] studied the structure of -ring and obtained various generalizations of the
corresponding results of ring theory. Hvala [4] introduced the concept of Generalized
derivations in rings. Dey, Paul and Rakhimov [3] discussed some properties of
Generalized derivations in semiprime gamma rings Bresar [2] studied on the distance of
the composition of two derivations to the generalized derivations. Jaya Subba Reddy. et
al. [5] studied centralizing and commutating left generalized derivation on prime ring is
commutative. Jaya Subba Reddy et al. [12] studied some results of symmetric reverse
bi-derivations on prime rings, Ozturk et al. [10] studied on derivations of prime gamma
rings. Khan et al. [6,7] studied on derivations and generalized derivations on prime -
rings is a commutative. In this paper we extended some results on left generalized
derivations on prime -ring is a commutative.
2. Preliminaries
If and are additive abelian groups and there exists a mapping
which satisfies the following conditions:
For all and ,
C. Jaya Subba Reddy, K. Nagesh and A. Sivakameshwara Kumar
128
(i) , denoted by , is an element of
(ii) , ,
(iii)
then is called a -ring [1]. It is known that from (i), (iii) the following follows:
(A)
for all and in and all in [1].
Every ring is a -ring with . However a -ring need not be a ring. Let be a -
ring, then is called a prime -ring, if implies or , for all
and is called a semiprime -ring, if implies , for all
. Every prime-ring is obviously semiprime. If is a -ring, then is said to be 2-
torsion free if implies , for all . An additive subgroup of is
called a left (right) ideal of if . If is both left and right ideal of ,
then we say is an ideal of . Moreover, the set
s called the centre of the -ring . We shall write
, for
all and . We shall make use of the basic commutator identities:
and
, for all
and . If -ring satisfies the assumption (B) , for all
and . Let be a -ring. An additive mapping is called a
derivation on if holds for all and . An
additive mapping is called a generalized derivation if there exists a derivation
such that holds for all and . An
additive mapping is called a left generalized derivation if there exists a
derivation such that holds for all and
. A derivation of the form where are fixed elements of and
is called generalized inner derivation. An additive mapping is called a
left (right) centralizer if for all and
.
Lemma 2.1. Let be a prime -ring with 2-torsion free and a nonzero ideal of . Let
be a left generalized derivation of , associated with derivation d. If
, for all , then .
Proof: For all and , . That is, , which
implies . Let . The last relation along with (A) gives,
. Since is prime -ring and is a nonzero ideal, so , for all
. Hence , by hypothesis, , for all , and , and . That is,
, which gives Let . The last relation
along with (A), implies . Since is nonzero and primeness of , gives
.
Lemma 2.2. Let be a nonzero ideal of a prime -ring , and is a left
generalized derivation of , with associated nonzero derivation , then
(i) If for all and , then ,
(ii)If for all and , then .
Proof:
Left Generalized Derivations on Prime Γ-Rings
129
(i) For any and , . That is,
Which implies, . Since is a
nonzero ideal of and , we get .
(ii) Proof is similar to (i).
3. Main results
Theorem 3.1. Let be a prime -ring with 2-torsion free and a nonzero ideal of .
Let be a left generalized derivation of , with associated nonzero derivation d
on . If for all , then is a commutative -ring.
Proof: Using hypothesis, we have
, for all , , which
gives
Using hypothesis, we get
Using (B), from the last equation we get
, for all ,
. (1)
Let . Replacing by in equation (1), we get
Which along with equation (1) and (B) gives ,
, for all and .
Since is a nonzero ideal of and , therefore is a commutative - ring.
Theorem 3.2. Let be a prime -ring with 2-torsion free and a nonzero ideal of .
Let be a generalized derivation and left generalized derivation of , with
associated derivation d on . If and
, for all , , then
either or .
Proof: Using hypothesis, we have
for any , and .
This gives
The last equation gives
Using hypothesis, from the last equation we get
Using (B), from the last equation we get
(2)
Let . Replacing by in equation (2), we get
Using equation (2), from the last equation we get
C. Jaya Subba Reddy, K. Nagesh and A. Sivakameshwara Kumar
130
Using (B), from the last equation we get
Replacing by from the last equation, we get
, for all , and .
Since is nonzero ideal of prime -ring , therefore either or .
Corollary 3.2.1. Let be a prime -ring with 2-torsion free and a nonzero ideal of
. Let be a left generalized derivation of , with associated derivation d on
. If
, for all , , then is a commutative -ring.
Proof: Using Theorem 3.2, we have , we get the corollary 3.2.1 proof.
Theorem 3.3. Let be a prime -ring with 2-torsion free and a nonzero ideal of .
Let be a left generalized derivation of , with associated derivation d on . If
, for all , , then .
Proof: , for any , .
(3)
Let , .Then replacing by in equation (3), we get
, for all , and .
Since is a nonzero ideal of the prime -ring , therefore either for all
or for all . If , then for all . Replacing
by in the last equation, we get , which implies
, which gives . That is , for all ,
. Thus for all for both cases. So .
Theorem 3.4. Let be a prime -ring with 2-torsion free and a nonzero ideal of .
Let be a left generalized derivation of , with associated derivation d on . If
, for all , , then .
Proof: , for all , .
(4)
Let , . Replacing by in equation (4), we get
Using (B), from the last equation we get
(5)
Let , . Then replacing by , we get
Using equation (5) in above equation, we get
Using (B), from the last equation we get
Left Generalized Derivations on Prime Γ-Rings
131
Since is a nonzero ideal of the prime -ring . Therefore either for all
or
for all and . Let and
. Obviously and are additive subgroups of .
Moreover is the set theoretic union of and . But a group cannot be set theoretic
union of two proper sub groups . Hence either or . If , we have
, which completes the proof. If , then
for all , and . Thus, we obtain , Using Theorem
3.2, we get .
Acknowledgements. We are thankful to the reviewers for their comments to improve the
presentation of the paper.
REFERENCES
1. W.E.Barnes, On the Γ-rings of Nobusawa, Pacific J. Math., 18 (3) (1966) 411-422.
2. M.Bresar, On the distance of the composition of two derivations to the generalized
Derivations, Glasgow Math. J., 33 (1) (1991) 89-93.
3. K.K.Dey, A.C.Paul and I.S.Rakhimov, Generalized derivations in semiprime
gamma rings, IJMMS, 2012.
4. B.Hvala, Generalized derivations in rings, Comm. Algebra, 26 (4) (1998) 1147-1166.
5. C.Jaya Subba Reddy, S.Mallikarjuna Rao and V.Vijaya Kumar, Centralizing and
commuting left generalized derivations on prime rings, Bulletin of Mathematical
Science and Applications, 11 (2015) 1-3.
6. A.R.Khan, M.Anwar Chaudhry and Imran Javaid, Generalized derivations on prime
-rings, World Applied Sciences Journal, 23 (12) (2013) 59-64.
7. A.R.Khan, I.Javaid and M.Anwar Chaudhry: Derivations on semiprime
Γ
-rings,
Utilitas Mathematica, 90 (2013) 171-185.
8. S.Kyuno, On prime gamma rings, Pacific J. Math., 75 (1) (1978) 185-190.
9. N.Nobusawa, On the generalization of the ring theory, Osaka J. Math., 1 (1964) 81-
89.
10. M.A.Ozturk, Y.B.Jun and K.H.Kim, On derivations of prime gamma rings. Turk.
J. Math., 26 (2002) 317-327.
11. C.Yilmaz, and M.A.Ozturk, On Jordan generalized derivations in gamma rings,
Hacet. J. Math. Stat.,33 (2004) 11-14.
12. C. Jaya Subba Reddy, A. Sivakameshwara Kumar and B. Ramoorthy Reddy, Results
of Symmetric Reverse bi-derivations on Prime Rings, Ann. Pure and Applied
Math,16(1)(2018) 1-6.
13. A.K.Kadhim,H.Sulaiman and A.R.H.Majeed, Gamma * derivation pair and jordan
gamma*− derivation pair on gamma-ring M with involution, Ann. Pure and Applied
Math, 10(2) (2015) 169-177.