ArticlePDF Available

Left Generalized Derivations on Prime gamma Rings

Authors:

Abstract

Let be a prime-ring with 2-torsion free, a nonzero ideal of M and : → a left generalized derivation of , with associated nonzero derivation d on. If () ∈ () for all ∈ , then is a commutative-ring.
Annals of Pure and Applied Mathematics
Vol. 16, No. 1, 2018, 127-131
ISSN: 2279-087X (P), 2279-0888(online)
Published on 5 January 2018
www.researchmathsci.org
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22457/apam.v16n1a14
127
Annals of
Left Generalized Derivations on Prime Γ-Rings
C. Jaya Subba Reddy
1
, K. Nagesh
2
and A. Sivakameshwara Kumar
3
1
Department of Mathematics, Sri Venkateswara University
Tirupati-517502, India. E-mail: cjsreddysvu@gmail.com
2
Department of Mathematics, Rayalaseema University
Kurnool, Andhrapradesh, India. E-mail: nagesh.kunda100@gmail.com
3
Department of Mathematics, Rayalaseema University
Kurnool, Andhrapradesh, India. E-mail: kamesh1069@gmail.com
Received 6 December 2017; accepted 26 December 2017
Abstract. Let be a prime -ring with 2-torsion free, a nonzero ideal of M and
  a left generalized derivation of , with associated nonzero derivation d on .
If    for all   , then is a commutative -ring.
Keywords: Gamma ring, prime gamma ring, derivation, generalized derivation, left
generalized derivation, commutators.
AMS Mathematics Subject Classification (2010): 06F25
1. Introduction
The notion of -ring was first introduction by Nobusawa [9] and also shown that -ring,
more general than rings. Barnes [1] slightly weakened the conditions in the definitions of
a -rings in the sense of Nobusawa. After the study of -rings by Nobusawa [9] and
Barnes [1], many researchers have a done lot of work and have obtained some
generalizations of the corresponding results in ring theory [6][8]. Barnes [1] and kyuno
[8] studied the structure of -ring and obtained various generalizations of the
corresponding results of ring theory. Hvala [4] introduced the concept of Generalized
derivations in rings. Dey, Paul and Rakhimov [3] discussed some properties of
Generalized derivations in semiprime gamma rings Bresar [2] studied on the distance of
the composition of two derivations to the generalized derivations. Jaya Subba Reddy. et
al. [5] studied centralizing and commutating left generalized derivation on prime ring is
commutative. Jaya Subba Reddy et al. [12] studied some results of symmetric reverse
bi-derivations on prime rings, Ozturk et al. [10] studied on derivations of prime gamma
rings. Khan et al. [6,7] studied on derivations and generalized derivations on prime -
rings is a commutative. In this paper we extended some results on left generalized
derivations on prime -ring is a commutative.
2. Preliminaries
If and are additive abelian groups and there exists a mapping       
which satisfies the following conditions:
For all   and   ,
C. Jaya Subba Reddy, K. Nagesh and A. Sivakameshwara Kumar
128
(i)   , denoted by , is an element of
(ii)      ,       ,      
(iii)   
then is called a -ring [1]. It is known that from (i), (iii) the following follows:
       (A)
for all and in and all in [1].
Every ring is a -ring with   . However a -ring need not be a ring. Let be a -
ring, then is called a prime -ring, if    implies    or   , for all
  and is called a semiprime -ring, if    implies   , for all  
. Every prime-ring is obviously semiprime. If is a -ring, then is said to be 2-
torsion free if    implies   , for all    . An additive subgroup of is
called a left (right) ideal of if      . If is both left and right ideal of ,
then we say is an ideal of . Moreover, the set   
  s called the centre of the -ring . We shall write  
   , for
all   and    . We shall make use of the basic commutator identities:
 
 
   
and  
 
   
, for all
   and   . If -ring satisfies the assumption (B)   , for all
   and   . Let be a -ring. An additive mapping   is called a
derivation on if     holds for all     and  . An
additive mapping   is called a generalized derivation if there exists a derivation
  such that     holds for all   and  . An
additive mapping   is called a left generalized derivation if there exists a
derivation    such that    holds for all   and
  . A derivation of the form    where   are fixed elements of and
   is called generalized inner derivation. An additive mapping   is called a
left (right) centralizer if     for all   and
  .
Lemma 2.1. Let be a prime -ring with 2-torsion free and a nonzero ideal of . Let
  be a left generalized derivation of , associated with derivation d. If
, for all   , then  .
Proof: For all   and   ,  . That is,    , which
implies   . Let   . The last relation along with (A) gives,
  . Since is prime -ring and is a nonzero ideal, so  , for all
  . Hence , by hypothesis,  , for all   , and   , and   . That is,
   , which gives   Let   . The last relation
along with (A), implies  . Since is nonzero and primeness of , gives
  .
Lemma 2.2. Let be a nonzero ideal of a prime -ring ,    and   is a left
generalized derivation of , with associated nonzero derivation , then
(i) If    for all    and   , then   ,
(ii)If   for all    and   , then   .
Proof:
Left Generalized Derivations on Prime Γ-Rings
129
(i) For any   and  ,  . That is,
     Which implies,   . Since is a
nonzero ideal of and   , we get   .
(ii) Proof is similar to (i).
3. Main results
Theorem 3.1. Let be a prime -ring with 2-torsion free and a nonzero ideal of .
Let   be a left generalized derivation of , with associated nonzero derivation d
on . If    for all   , then is a commutative -ring.
Proof: Using hypothesis, we have  
 , for all   ,  , which
gives   
 
 
 
  
  
  
Using hypothesis, we get
 
  
  
        
Using (B), from the last equation we get
        
    , for all   ,  
. (1)
Let   . Replacing by  in equation (1), we get
    
Which along with equation (1) and (B) gives ,
    
 
 , for all   and   .
Since is a nonzero ideal of and   , therefore is a commutative - ring.
Theorem 3.2. Let be a prime -ring with 2-torsion free and a nonzero ideal of .
Let   be a generalized derivation and left generalized derivation of , with
associated derivation d on . If    and  
 , for all  ,    , then
either    or  .
Proof: Using hypothesis, we have
 
  for any   ,    and   .
This gives   
 
 
 
 
The last equation gives
 
 
  
  
  
Using hypothesis, from the last equation we get
 
 
  
 
         
Using (B), from the last equation we get
         
        (2)
Let   . Replacing by  in equation (2), we get
       
        
 
Using equation (2), from the last equation we get
C. Jaya Subba Reddy, K. Nagesh and A. Sivakameshwara Kumar
130
       
 
       
 
Using (B), from the last equation we get
   
 
 
   
 
Replacing by from the last equation, we get
 
   
 
 
  , for all   ,    and    .
Since is nonzero ideal of prime -ring , therefore either   or   .
Corollary 3.2.1. Let be a prime -ring with 2-torsion free and a nonzero ideal of
. Let   be a left generalized derivation of , with associated derivation d on
. If  
 , for all   ,  , then is a commutative -ring.
Proof: Using Theorem 3.2, we have   , we get the corollary 3.2.1 proof.
Theorem 3.3. Let be a prime -ring with 2-torsion free and a nonzero ideal of .
Let   be a left generalized derivation of , with associated derivation d on . If
  , for all   ,  , then  .
Proof:   , for any   ,   .
   (3)
Let   ,  .Then replacing by  in equation (3), we get
  
  , for all   , and   .
Since is a nonzero ideal of the prime -ring , therefore either     for all
   or   for all   . If   , then   for all   . Replacing
by  in the last equation, we get  , which implies 
  , which gives     . That is   , for all   ,
  . Thus   for all    for both cases. So   .
Theorem 3.4. Let be a prime -ring with 2-torsion free and a nonzero ideal of .
Let   be a left generalized derivation of , with associated derivation d on . If
  , for all   ,   , then  .
Proof:    , for all   ,  .
    (4)
Let   ,   . Replacing by  in equation (4), we get
   
    
Using (B), from the last equation we get
    
  (5)
Let   ,  . Then replacing  by , we get
 
Using equation (5) in above equation, we get
 
Using (B), from the last equation we get
Left Generalized Derivations on Prime Γ-Rings
131
   
 
 
Since is a nonzero ideal of the prime -ring . Therefore either   for all   
or  
for all   and . Let      and  
   
    . Obviously and are additive subgroups of .
Moreover is the set theoretic union of and . But a group cannot be set theoretic
union of two proper sub groups . Hence either   or    . If    , we have
 , which completes the proof. If  , then    
  
for all   ,   and   . Thus, we obtain   , Using Theorem
3.2, we get   .
Acknowledgements. We are thankful to the reviewers for their comments to improve the
presentation of the paper.
REFERENCES
1. W.E.Barnes, On the Γ-rings of Nobusawa, Pacific J. Math., 18 (3) (1966) 411-422.
2. M.Bresar, On the distance of the composition of two derivations to the generalized
Derivations, Glasgow Math. J., 33 (1) (1991) 89-93.
3. K.K.Dey, A.C.Paul and I.S.Rakhimov, Generalized derivations in semiprime
gamma rings, IJMMS, 2012.
4. B.Hvala, Generalized derivations in rings, Comm. Algebra, 26 (4) (1998) 1147-1166.
5. C.Jaya Subba Reddy, S.Mallikarjuna Rao and V.Vijaya Kumar, Centralizing and
commuting left generalized derivations on prime rings, Bulletin of Mathematical
Science and Applications, 11 (2015) 1-3.
6. A.R.Khan, M.Anwar Chaudhry and Imran Javaid, Generalized derivations on prime
-rings, World Applied Sciences Journal, 23 (12) (2013) 59-64.
7. A.R.Khan, I.Javaid and M.Anwar Chaudhry: Derivations on semiprime
Γ
-rings,
Utilitas Mathematica, 90 (2013) 171-185.
8. S.Kyuno, On prime gamma rings, Pacific J. Math., 75 (1) (1978) 185-190.
9. N.Nobusawa, On the generalization of the ring theory, Osaka J. Math., 1 (1964) 81-
89.
10. M.A.Ozturk, Y.B.Jun and K.H.Kim, On derivations of prime gamma rings. Turk.
J. Math., 26 (2002) 317-327.
11. C.Yilmaz, and M.A.Ozturk, On Jordan generalized derivations in gamma rings,
Hacet. J. Math. Stat.,33 (2004) 11-14.
12. C. Jaya Subba Reddy, A. Sivakameshwara Kumar and B. Ramoorthy Reddy, Results
of Symmetric Reverse bi-derivations on Prime Rings, Ann. Pure and Applied
Math,16(1)(2018) 1-6.
13. A.K.Kadhim,H.Sulaiman and A.R.H.Majeed, Gamma * derivation pair and jordan
gamma*derivation pair on gamma-ring M with involution, Ann. Pure and Applied
Math, 10(2) (2015) 169-177.
... To prove that R is Г-regular Let (α ̶ α ω α) ∈ J and there is a unit ω ∈ R * and where α ∈ R such that α ̶ α ω α = (α ̶ α ω α)ߛ(α ̶ α ω α) where ߛ ∈ I * . Then α = α ̶ α ω α + α ω α= (α ̶ α ω α) ߛ (α ̶ α ω α) + α ω α = (α γ⎼ α ω α γ)(α ⎼ α ω α)+ α ω α= α γ α ⎼α γ α ω α ⎼α ω α γ α + α ω α γ α ω α+ α ω α = α(ߛ ̶ ߛ α ω ̶ ω α ߛ ̶ + ω α ߛ α ω + ω)α=α ߜ α, Where ߜ = γ ̶ ߛ α ω ⎼ω α ߛ ̶ + ω α ߛ α ω + ω ∈ R * [11]. Since I * ⊆R * and R * is an ideal in (R, Г).Hence R is Гregular. ...
Article
Full-text available
Let R be a prime ring and d a derivation on R . If is a left generalized derivation on R such that ƒ is centralizing on a left ideal U of R, then R is commutative.
Article
Full-text available
We define generalized derivations and Jordan generalized derivations on Γ-rings and show that a Jordan generalized derivation on some Γ-ring is a generalized derivation.
Article
Full-text available
Let M be a 2-torsion free semiprime Γ-ring. If there exists a derivation D:M→M, such that [[D(x),x] α ,x] α =0, then [D(x),x] α =0 for all x∈M and α∈Γ.
Article
Full-text available
We consider some results in a Γ-ring M with derivation which is related to Q, and the quotient Γ-ring of M.
Article
Full-text available
Let M be a 2-torsion-free semiprime Γ -ring satisfying the condition a α b β c = a β b α c for all a , b , c ∈ M , α , β ∈ Γ , and let D : M → M be an additive mapping such that D ( x α x ) = D ( x ) α x + x α d ( x ) for all x ∈ M , α ∈ Γ and for some derivation d of M . We prove that D is a generalized derivation.
Article
Let R be a 2-torsion free *-prime ring and F be a generalized derivation of R with associated derivation d. If U is a *-Lie ideal of R then in the present paper, we shall show that U ⊆ Z(R) if R admits a generalized derivation F(with associated derivation d) satisfying any one of the properties: (i)F[u, v] = [F(u), v], (ii)F(u o v) - F(u) o υ, (iii)F[u, w] = [F(u), w] + [d(w), u], (iv)F(u o v) = F(u) o v + d(v) o u, (v)F(uv) ± uv = 0 and (vi)d(u)F(v) ± uv = 0 for all u, v ∈ U.
Article
N. Nobusawa recently introduced the notion of a Γ-uring, more general than a ring, and obtained analogues of the Wedderburn theorems for Γ-rings with minimum condition on left ideals. In this paper the notions of Γ-homomorphism, prime and (right) primary ideals, m-systems, and the radical of an ideal are extended to Tarings, where the defining conditions for a Γ-ring have been slightly weakened to permit defining residue class Γ-rings. The radical R of a Γ-ring M is shown to be an ideal of M, and the radical of M/R to be zero, by methods similar to those of McCoy. If M satisfies the maximum condition for ideals, the radical of a primary ideal is shown to be prime, and the ideal Q ≠ M is P-primary if and only if Pn ⫅ Q for some n, and AB ⫅ Q, A ⫋ P implies B ⫅ Q. Finally, in Γ-rings with maximum condition, if an ideal has a primary representation, then the usual uniqueness theorems are shown to hold by methods similar to those of Murdoch.
Article
A well-known theorem of E. Posner [10] states that if the composition d 1 d 2 of derivations d 1 d 2 of a prime ring A of characteristic not 2 is a derivation, then either d 1 = 0 or d 2 = 0. A number of authors have generalized this theorem in several ways (see e.g. [1], [2], and [5], where further references can be found). Under stronger assumptions when A is the algebra of all bounded linear operators on a Banach space (resp. Hilbert space), Posner's theorem was reproved in [3] (resp. [12]). Recently, M. Mathieu [8] extended Posner's theorem to arbitrary C * -algebras.