Content uploaded by Edgar Cabanas
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Edgar Cabanas on Apr 24, 2019
Content may be subject to copyright.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354317747988
Theory & Psychology
2018, Vol. 28(1) 3 –19
© The Author(s) 2018
Reprints and permissions:
sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/0959354317747988
journals.sagepub.com/home/tap
Positive Psychology and the
legitimation of individualism
Edgar Cabanas
Universidad Camilo José Cela, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Center for the History of
Emotions
Abstract
Positive Psychology (PP) has been firmly institutionalized as a worldwide phenomenon, especially
in the last decade. Its promise of well-being has captured many people’s longings for solutions in
times of significant social uncertainty, instability, and insecurity. The field, nevertheless, has been
severely criticized on multiple fronts. This article argues that positive psychology is characterized
by a narrow sense of the social as well as by a strong individualistic bias that reflects the core
beliefs of neoliberal ideology. In this regard, the present paper aims to illustrate the extent to
which individualism is essential to understanding the theoretical and empirical foundations of PP’s
conceptualization of happiness. Additionally, the paper questions whether positive psychology
and its individualist conception of human well-being are not themselves contributing to sustain
and create some of the dissatisfaction to which they promise a solution.
Keywords
critical psychology, happiness, individualism, positive psychology, subjectivity
In the book The Minimal Self, Christopher Lasch (1984) argued that in times of trouble
everyday life tends to become an exercise of “psychic survival”—one in which people,
confronted with an unstable, risky, and unpredictable environment, take recourse to a
sort of emotional retreat from any commitment other than their psychic self-improve-
ment and personal well-being. Similarly, Isaiah Berlin noted that “the retreat to the inner
citadel”—an individualistic doctrine that prompts us to escape into the fortress of our
true self—“seems to arise when the external world has proved to be exceptionally arid,
cruel, or unjust” (1968, p. 139). Jack Barbalet made similar observations, pointing out
that in times “when opportunities meaningfully to influence economic, political, and
other processes are low, then persons are likely to experience themselves as centers of
Corresponding author:
Edgar Cabanas, Universidad Camilo Jose Cela, C/ Castillo de Alarcón, 49, Villafranca del Castillo,
Madrid, 28692, Spain.
Email: ecabanas@ucjc.edu
747988TAP0010.1177/0959354317747988Theory & PsychologyCabanas
research-article2018
Article
Cabanas 17
Jun, K.-H. (2015). Re-exploration of subjective well-being determinants: Full-model approach
with extended cross-contextual analysis. International Journal of Wellbeing, 5(4), 17–59.
doi: 10.5502/ijw.v5i4.405
Kristjánsson, K. (2012). Positive psychology and positive education: Old wine in new bottles?
Educational Psychologist, 47(2), 86–105. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2011.610678
Lamont, M. (2016). Trump’s triumph and social science adrift …what is to be done? American
Sociological Association. Retrieved from http://www.asanet.org/trumps-triumph-and-social-
science-adrift-what-be-done
Lasch, C. (1984). The minimal self: Psychic survival in troubled times. New York, NY: W. W.
Norton & Company.
Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. London, UK: Allen.
Lipovetsky, G. (2007). La felicidad paradójica [Paradoxical happiness]. Barcelona, Spain:
Editorial Anagrama.
Mauss, I. B., Tamir, M., Anderson, C. L., & Savino, N. S. (2011). Can seeking happiness make
people unhappy? Paradoxical effects of valuing happiness. Emotion, 11(4), 807–815. doi:
10.1037/a0022010
McNulty, J. K., & Fincham, F. D. (2012). Beyond positive psychology? Toward a contextual
view of psychological processes and well-being. American Psychologist, 67(2), 101–110.
doi: 10.1037/a0024572
Miller, A. (2008). A critique of positive psychology—Or “the new science of happiness”. Journal
of Philosophy of Education, 42, 591–608. doi: 10.1111/j.1467–9752.2008.00646.x
Mongrain, M., & Anselmo-Matthews, T. (2012). Do positive psychology exercises work? A
replication of Seligman et al. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68, 382–389. doi: 10.1002/
jclp.21839
Nandy, A. (2013). Regimes of narcissism, regimes of despair. New Delhi, India: Oxford University
Press.
Oishi, S. (2000). Goals as cornerstones of subjective well-being. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.),
Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 87–112). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). OECD guidelines on measur-
ing subjective well-being. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264191655-en
Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2006). Moral competence and character strengths among adolescents:
The development and validation of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for Youth.
Journal of Adolescence, 29(6), 891–909. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.04.011
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The Satisfaction with Life Scale and the emerging con-
struct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(2), 137–152. doi:
10.1080/17439760701756946
Pérez-Álvarez, M. (2015). Reflexividad, escritura y génesis del sujeto moderno [Reflexivity, writ-
ing and genesis of the modern subject]. Revista de Historia de La Psicología, 36(1), 53–90.
Pérez-Álvarez, M. (2016). The science of happiness: As felicitous as it is fallacious. Journal of
Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 36(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1037/teo0000030
Ponocny, I., Weismayer, C., Stross, B., & Dressler, S. G. (2015). Are most people happy?
Exploring the meaning of subjective well-being ratings. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(6),
2635–2653. doi: 10.1007/s10902–015–9710–0
Richardson, F. C., & Guignon, C. B. (2008). Positive psychology and philosophy of social science.
Theory & Psychology, 18, 605–627. doi: 10.1177/0959354308093398
Rose, N. (1998). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power and personhood. London, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
Rose, P., & Campbell, K. W. (2004). Greatness feels good: A telic model of narcissism and subjec-
tive well-being. Advances in Psychology Research, 31, 3–26.
18 Theory & Psychology 28(1)
Rusk, R. D., & Waters, L. E. (2013). Tracing the size, reach, impact, and breadth of positive psychol-
ogy. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(3), 207–221. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2013.777766
Schimmack, U., Oishi, S., & Diener, E. (2005). Individualism: A valid and important dimension of
cultural differences between nations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(1), 17–31.
doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_2
Schwarz, N., Knäuper, B., Oyserman, D., & Stich, C. (2008). The psychology of asking questions.
In E. D. de Leeuw, J. J. Hox, & D. A. Dillman (Eds.), International handbook of survey meth-
odology (pp. 18–36). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Seidman, E. (2016). Fourteen ways to jump for joy. In Time Magazine (Eds.), The science of hap-
piness: New discoveries for a more joyful life (pp. 34–41). New York, NY: Time Magazine.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your
potential for lasting fulfillment. New York, NY: Free Press.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A new understanding of happiness and well-being–and how
to achieve them. London, UK: Nicholas Brealey.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction.
American Psychologist, 55, 5–14. doi: 10.1177/0022167801411002
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2001). “Positive psychology: An introduction”:
Reply. American Psychologist, 56, 89–90. doi: 10.1037/0003–066X.56.1.89
Seppälä, E. (2016). 6 secrets to a happier life. In Time Magazine (Eds.), The science of happiness:
New discoveries for a more joyful life (pp. 11–17). Retrieved from http://time.com/collection/
guide-to-happiness/4856944/secrets-happier-life/
Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J., Ryan, R. M., Chirkov, V., Kim, Y., Wu, C., …Sun, Z. (2004).
Self-concordance and subjective well-being in four cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural
Psychology, 35(2), 209–223. doi: 10.1177/0022022103262245
Slife, B. D., & Richardson, F. C. (2008). Problematic ontological underpinnings of positive psy-
chology: A strong relational alternative. Theory & Psychology, 18, 699–723. doi: 10.1177/
0959354308093403
Smelser, N. J. (1989). Self-esteem and social problems: An introduction. In A. M. Mecca, N. J.
Smelser, & J. Vaconcellos (Eds.), The social importance of self-esteem (pp. 1–23). Berkeley:
University of California Press.
Steele, L. G., & Lynch, S. M. (2013). The pursuit of happiness in China: Individualism, collectiv-
ism, and subjective well-being during China’s economic and social transformation. Social
Indicators Research, 114(2), 441–451. doi: 10.1007/s11205–012–0154–1
Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2013). Subjective well-being and income: Is there any evidence of
satiation? American Economic Review, 103(3), 598–604. doi: 10.3386/w18992
Sugarman, J. (2015). Neoliberalism and psychological ethics. Journal of Theoretical and
Philosophical Psychology, 35(2), 103–116.
Suh, E. M., Diener, E., & Updegraff, J. A. (2009). From culture to priming conditions: Self-
construal influences on life satisfaction judgments. In E. Diener (Ed.), Culture and well-
being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 129–142). London, UK: Springer.
Sundararajan, L. (2005). Happiness donut: A Confucian critique of positive psychology. Journal
of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 25(1), 35–60.
Tan, H. B., & Forgas, J. P. (2010). When happiness makes us selfish, but sadness makes us fair:
Affective influences on interpersonal strategies in the dictator game. Journal of Experimental
Social Psychology, 46(3), 571–576. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.01.007
Taylor, E. (2001). Positive psychology and humanistic psychology: A reply to Seligman. Journal
of Humanistic Psychology, 41, 13–29. doi: 10.1177/0022167801411003
The Happiness Research Institute. (2014). The Happy Danes: Exploring the reasons behind the
high levels of happiness in Denmark. Copenhagen, Denmark. Retrieved from https://docs.
wixstatic.com/ugd/928487_7f341890e9484a279416ffbc9dc95ff4.pdf
Cabanas 19
Tomyn, A. J., & Cummins, R. A. (2011). Subjective wellbeing and homeostatically protected
mood: Theory validation with adolescents. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(5), 897–914.
doi: 10.1007/s10902–010–9235–5
Tov, W., & Diener, E. (2009). Culture and subjective well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), Culture and
well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 9–42). London, UK: Springer.
Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2007). The psychological structure of pride: A tale of two fac-
ets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 506–525. doi: 10.1037/0022–
3514.92.3.506
Vázquez, C. (2009). El bienestar de las naciones [The well-being of nations]. In C. Vázquez &
G. Hervás (Eds.), La ciencia del bienestar: Fundamentos de una Psicología Positiva [The
science of well-being: Foundations of a positive psychology] (pp. 103–142). Madrid, Spain:
Alianza Editorial.
Veenhoven, R. (2010). Life is getting better: Societal evolution and fit with human nature. Social
Indicators Research, 97(1), 105–122. doi: 10.1007/s11205–009–9556–0
Watters, E. (2010). Crazy like us: The globalization of the American psyche. New York, NY: Free
Press.
Whitaker, R. (2010). Anatomy of an epidemic: Magic bullets, psychiatric drugs, and the astonish-
ing rise of mental illness in America. New York, NY: Crown.
Zupančič, A. (2008). The odd one in. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author biography
Edgar Cabanas is an Associate Professor at the Universidad Camilo José Cela and Adjunct
Researcher at the Center for the History of Emotions (Max Planck Institute for Human
Development), in Berlin, where he has previously held a Postdoctoral Research position. His main
field of research focuses on the political, economic, and social uses of the contemporary notion of
happiness. He has published several papers and book chapters on this topic, such as The Making of
a “Happy Worker”: Positive Psychology in Neoliberal Organizations.