Available via license: CC BY-NC 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
© 2018 Milani and Sparavigna. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.
php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work
you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For
permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology 2018:11 51–57
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology Dovepress
submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
Dovepress 51
CLINICAL TRIAL REPORT
open access to scientific and medical research
Open Access Full Text Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S153905
Antiaging efcacy of melatonin-based day and
night creams: a randomized, split-face,
assessor-blinded proof-of-concept trial
Massimo Milani1
Adele Sparavigna2
1Medical Department, Cantabria Labs
Difa Cooper, Caronno Pertusella,
2Derming, Clinical Research and
Bioengineering Institute, Milan, Italy
Background: Skin is a complete and independent melatoninergic system. At the skin level,
melatonin (Mel) acts as a relevant antioxidant and cytoprotective substance. Topical application
of Mel is considered meaningful, since it can easily penetrate the stratum corneum. Exogenous
Mel can be expected to represent a potent antioxidative defense system against skin aging
mechanisms. Day and night creams containing Mel, carried in lipospheres (Melatosphere™),
have been developed (Nutriage SPF 30 day cream and Nutriage night cream).
Study aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a Mel-based cream as antiag-
ing treatment.
Subjects and methods: In a randomized, split-face, assessor-blinded, prospective 3-month
study, 22 women (mean age 55 years) with moderate–severe skin aging were enrolled (clinical trial
registration number: NCT03276897). Study products were applied in the morning (Nutriage day
cream) and evening (Nutriage night cream) on the right or left side of the face. Primary outcomes
were: 1) clinical evaluation of wrinkles’ grade (crow’s feet and nasolabial folds), surface microre-
lief, skin tonicity (resistance to pinching and traction, recovery after pinching) and skin dryness
and 2) instrumental evaluation of skin roughness and 3D photographic documentation (Vectra
H1 images system). Assessments of both clinical and instrumental evaluations were performed at
baseline and after 1, 2 and 3 months of treatment by an investigator unaware of treatment allocation.
Results: All the subjects completed the study. Crow’s feet was reduced significantly (p=0.05)
by –15% with the creams in comparison with the non-treated side after 3 months. At the end
of the study, surface microrelief (–26.5%), skin profilometry (–13%), skin tonicity (+30%)
and skin dryness (–59.5%) significantly improved with active treatment. Both products were
well tolerated.
Conclusion: In women with skin aging, Mel-based creams improved significantly skin tonicity
and skin hydration with a significant reduction in skin roughness, supporting the skin antiaging
effect of this molecule applied topically.
Keywords: melatonin, skin aging, assessor-blinded trial
Introduction
Skin is a complete and independent melatoninergic system.1,2 Skin can synthesize
melatonin (Mel), and skin cells express melatonin receptors MT1 and MT2.3,4 Mel is a
pleiotropic molecule.5 At the skin level, Mel acts as a relevant antioxidant and cytopro-
tective substance and plays a fundamental role in maintaining the homeostasis of the
skin.6 Skin Mel, and most of its metabolites, exerts a strong protection against oxidative
stress and ultraviolet radiation.2,7–9 Cutaneous melatoninergic and metabolic systems
can act as auto/paracrine protectors against environmentally induced damage.10 Skin
Correspondence: Massimo Milani
Medical Department, Cantabria Labs,
Difa Cooper, Via Milano 160, Caronno
Pertusella, VA, Italy
Email massimo.milani@difacooper.com
Journal name: Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
Article Designation: CLINICAL TRIAL REPORT
Year: 2018
Volume: 11
Running head verso: Milani and Sparavigna
Running head recto: Antiaging efficacy of melatonin-based day and night creams
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S153905
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology downloaded from https://www.dovepress.com/ by 168.151.238.25 on 25-Jan-2018
For personal use only.
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) 1 / 1
This article was published in the following Dove Press journal:
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology 2018:11
submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
Dovepress
Dovepress
52
Milani and Sparavigna
rapidly metabolizes Mel.11 Therefore, exogenous Mel can
be expected to represent one of the most potent antioxida-
tive defense systems against skin aging mechanisms.12 Oral
administration of Mel shows a prominent first-pass effect
with very low systemic level.13,14 Topical administration
could circumvent this problem. Topical application of Mel
is considered meaningful, since it can penetrate the stratum
corneum due to its distinct lipophilic chemical structure.15
So far, no clinical data regarding the efficacy of topical Mel
as an antiaging molecule has been reported. Recently, day
and night creams containing Mel, vehiculated in lipospheres
(Melatosphere™), have been developed (Nutriage day cream
and Nutriage night cream; Cantabria Labs, Difa Cooper,
Caronno Pertusella, VA, Italy). The liposphere carrier system
could further improve the penetration of the Mel molecules
through the skin layers.16
Study aim
The aim of this study was to assess the antiaging effect of
0.1% Mel-based creams (a day formulation and a night
formulation).
Subjects and methods
We planned a randomized, split-face, assessor-blinded, pro-
spective 3-month study.
Subjects
In all, 22 women (mean age 55 years) with moderate–severe
skin aging were enrolled after receiving their written informed
consent. The subjects also provided consent to the publica-
tion of any pictures. The inclusion criterion was women aged
≥45 years with moderate–severe facial skin aging (Glogau score
of 3 or 4). The exclusion criteria were any acute or chronic skin
conditions, which could interfere with the parameters of evalu-
ation and a positive history of allergic contact dermatitis to any
of the component of the creams. Study products were applied
one in the morning (Nutriage day cream) and one in the eve-
ning (Nutriage night cream) on the right or left side of the face
according to a randomization list. The randomization list was
generated using a dedicated software. The local institutional
review board (IRB; Independent Ethical Committee, c/o Derm-
ing Clinic, Milan, Italy) approved the trial protocol on March
10, 2017 (clinical trial registration Number: NCT03276897).
The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical prin-
ciples of the Declaration of Helsinki and consistent with the
Good Clinical Practice (GCP) regulatory requirements.17 Com-
pliance to the treatment was evaluated counting the returned
used cream blisters at visits during months 1, 2 and 3.
Study outcomes
Primary outcomes were: 1) clinical evaluation of wrinkles’
grade (crow’s feet and nasolabial folds), surface microrelief,
skin firmness/tonicity (resistance to pinching and traction,
recovery after pinching) and skin dryness and 2) instrumental
evaluation of skin roughness and 3D photographic documen-
tation (Vectra H1 images system). Assessments of both clini-
cal and instrumental evaluations were performed at baseline
and after 1, 2 and 3 months of treatment by an investigator
unaware of treatment allocation. Secondary outcome was the
local tolerability of the products evaluated. Sky dryness was
evaluated using a 6-point score scale (from 0: very hydrated
to 5: very dry). Resistance to traction, resistance to pinching
and recovery after pinching were evaluated using a 5-point
score scale (from 0: very strong to 4: very weak). Wrinkles’
grade and surface microrelief were scored visually on the base
of high-definition pictures using the Glogau18 (crow’s feet)
and Monheit et al19 (nasolabial) photographic 6-point scales.
Surface microrelief was evaluated using a 4-point scale (from
1: very regular to 4: very irregular). Instrumental evaluation
of wrinkles using profilometry was performed at the crow’s
feet area using Primos compact portable device (GFMesste-
chinck, Konstanz; Germany). The Primos software is able to
elaborate 3D representations of skin wrinkles and to measure
skin principal profilometric parameters. Pictures with the
Vectra device were performed in a standardized (distance
and illumination) manner with the subjects with open eyes
and relaxed face muscles. Finally, the Spiderming™ radial
graph was used to “visualize” the global antiaging effect of
the treatment.20 This graph (Derming S.r.l. Clinical Research
Institute, Milan, Italy) allows the results to be evaluated and
the effect of an antiaging cosmetic product to be visualized,
taking into account that a smaller area of the graph coincides
with a younger skin; the activity of the products in terms of
antiaging activity could be quantified.
Statistical analysis and sample size
calculation
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Statisti-
cal Software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).
Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard
deviation (SD). The primary outcomes of the study were to
evaluate scores of skin parameters at month 3 in comparison
with baseline values (intragroup evaluation) using paired
nonparametric test (Wilcoxon test) and to compare at month
3, the same skin parameters between treated and non-treated
sides (intergroup evaluation) using unpaired nonparametric
test (Mann–Whitney test). The secondary outcome was to
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology downloaded from https://www.dovepress.com/ by 168.151.238.25 on 25-Jan-2018
For personal use only.
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) 1 / 1
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology 2018:11 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
Dovepress
Dovepress
53
Antiaging efcacy of melatonin-based day and night creams
evaluate the evolution of the skin variables during the study
at each visit (baseline, month 1, month 2 and month 3) using
analysis of variance (ANOVA) test for repeated measures.
Inferential statistical analysis was done based on intention-
to-treat principle. In view of the proof-of-concept nature of
the present trial, a formal sample size calculation was not per-
formed. We decided to enroll at least 20 evaluable subjects.
Results
The trial was conducted between March 2017 and September
2017 in an outpatient derma-esthetic clinic. All the subjects
completed the study. In comparison with baseline value, skin
dryness was significantly (p=0.001; Wilcoxon test) reduced
by 59.5% (from 3.6±0.7 to 1.5±0.4) on the side treated with
Mel creams. Skin dryness score was significantly lower in the
active-treated side in comparison with the non-treated side
(p=0.01; Mann–Whitney U test; 1.5±0.4 vs 3.5±0.6; Figure
1A). Skin tonicity (resistance to traction, resistance to pinch-
ing and recovery after pinching) significantly improved by
33% in comparison with the baseline value on the side treated
with Mel creams only (from 3.0±0.5 to 2.1±0.4; Figure 1B
and C). Crow’s feet photographic severity score was reduced
significantly (p=0.05) by -15% with the creams in compari-
son with both baseline value (2.3±0.2 vs. 2.7±0.3) and value
of the non-treated side after 3 months. Surface microrelief
photographic score was significantly reduced by -26.5% at
the end of treatment in comparison with both baseline value
(2.4±0.5 vs. 3.4±0.6; p=0.001; Wilcoxon test) and value of
the control side at month 3 (2.4±0.5 vs. 3.3±0.6; p=0.001;
Mann–Whitney U test). Significant improvements were also
observed starting from month 1 on the sides treated with the
active product (ANOVA test; data not shown). For all the skin
parameters evaluated, nonstatistical significant modifications
have been observed in the control side comparing baseline
and 3-month values. Figure 2 shows the evolution of the
Spiderming graph with a significant reduction in the total area
after active treatment in comparison with baseline and non-
treated sides. Skin profilometry evaluation showed a -13%
Figure 1 Evolution of skin parameters and treatment.
Notes: (A) Skin dryness evaluation (score from 0: very hydrated to 5: very dry; *p=0.001 in comparison with baseline, Wilcoxon test; **p=0.01 in comparison with the
control side; Mann–Whitney U test). (B) Skin tonicity evaluation: resistance to traction (score from 0: very relevant to 4: very weak; *p=0.05 in comparison with baseline,
Wilcoxon test; **p=0.05 in comparison with the control side, Mann–Whitney U test). (C) Skin tonicity evaluation: recovery after pinching (score from 0: very relevant to 4:
very weak; *p=0.05 in comparison with baseline, Wilcoxon test; **p=0.05 in comparison with the control side, Mann–Whitney U test).
Abbreviation: Mel, melatonin.
Dryness severity score Skin tonicity: resistance to traction
Skin tonicity: recovery after pinching
0
1
2
3
Score
4
5
AB
C
0
1
2
3
Score
4
Score
0
1
2
3
4
*
**
*
**
*
**
Mel cream Control
Baseline
Month 3
Baseline
Month 3
Baseline
Month 3
Mel cream Control
Mel cream Control
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology downloaded from https://www.dovepress.com/ by 168.151.238.25 on 25-Jan-2018
For personal use only.
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) 1 / 1
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology 2018:11
submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
Dovepress
Dovepress
54
Milani and Sparavigna
reduction in roughness profile, –13% reduction in wrinkles’
maximum depth and –7.2% reduction in total wrinkles’ height
in comparison with baseline and control sides. However,
these reductions, although clinically relevant, did not reach a
statistical significant difference. Figure 3 shows two subjects’
pictures performed with Vectra at baseline and after 3 months
of treatment. Both products (day and night creams) were well
tolerated. No side effects were reported. Compliance to the
treatment was >90% in all the enrolled subjects.
Discussion
Mel is considered as a strong antioxidant molecule, and it
is one of the most potent ·OH radical scavenger in nature.21
Experimental studies have shown that Mel is a stronger
radical scavenger than vitamins C and E.22 Extrapineal Mel
production has been demonstrated in bone marrow, cerebro-
spinal fluid, ovary, eye, lymphocytes, gastric mucosa and
skin.23–25 Human skin and skin-derived cells can produce and
metabolize Mel, and Mel exerts many effects on cell growth
“Crow’s feet”
Resistance to traction
Recovery after pinching
Resistance to pinching
Vascular and pigmentary homogeneity
Skin dryness
Surface microrelief
Nasolabial folds
Figure 2 Evaluation of skin parameters.
Notes: The Spidermig™ graph. Black line: baseline values; red line: one month application of melatonin (Mel)-products; green line: two-month application of Mel products;
blue line: three-month application of Mel-products.
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology downloaded from https://www.dovepress.com/ by 168.151.238.25 on 25-Jan-2018
For personal use only.
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) 1 / 1
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology 2018:11 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
Dovepress
Dovepress
55
Antiaging efcacy of melatonin-based day and night creams
regulation and skin tissue homeostasis via Mel receptors
MT1 and MT2.26 Skin can produce large amount of Mel.27,28
The protective effects of Mel against ultraviolet (UV) solar
skin damage are mediated through direct and indirect radical
scavenging and antioxidative enzyme-stimulating actions.29
Several data support the concept that at the skin level. Mel and
its metabolites serve as protectors against physicochemical
(oxidative damage, ultraviolet radiation [UVR], chemicals)
and biological stressors. The antioxidant action of Mel has
also genomic influences, regulating the expression of several
genes.30 Mel stimulates both antioxidant enzyme activity and
cellular mRNA levels for these enzymes.31 Mel could also
protect DNA from oxidative damage.32 Mel can maintain
mitochondrial membrane potential in UVR-exposed kera-
tinocytes.33,34 Therefore, Mel is a good cytoprotective and
antiaging molecule.35 As stated by Fischer et al,36 for applica-
tion in clinical dermatology, exogenous Mel should be used
topically rather than orally, since orally administered Mel
appears in rather low levels in the blood due to prominent
first-pass degradation in the liver, thus limiting skin access.
Topical administration circumvents this problem. Therefore,
in contrast with oral administration, topical application of Mel
Figure 3 Vectra 3D images.
Notes: Subject 1: (A) baseline and (B) after 3 months of active treatment (active products were applied on the left side). Subject 2: (C) baseline and (D) after 3 months of
active treatment (active products were applied on the right side).
AB
CD
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology downloaded from https://www.dovepress.com/ by 168.151.238.25 on 25-Jan-2018
For personal use only.
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) 1 / 1
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology 2018:11
submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
Dovepress
Dovepress
56
Milani and Sparavigna
is considered meaningful, since it can penetrate the stratum
corneum due to its distinct lipophilic chemical structure. In
the present study, the tested products contain Mel molecules
incorporated in lipospheres (Melatosphere) with the aim to
further increase the skin penetration of the molecule. So far,
no clinical data regarding the efficacy of topical Mel as an
antiaging molecule has been reported. In our study, we evalu-
ated for the first time, the efficacy of two Mel-based products
in women with skin aging. The results we observed show that
in comparison with the non-treated control side, these topical
Mel formulations improve skin hydration and skin tonicity
with a clinical improvement in the aspect of wrinkles. Some
limitations should be taken into account in evaluating our
results. First, this is a proof-of-concept study. Future trials with
larger sample size are warranted to evaluate the real clinical
effects of these products in the treatment of skin aging. A
second limitation of this study is that this is not a double-blind
trial. However, to increase the internal validity of our results,
we adopted a split face, assessor-blinded study design.
Conclusion
In women with skin aging, Mel-based creams improved sig-
nificantly skin tonicity and skin hydration with a significant
reduction in skin roughness, supporting the skin antiaging
effect of this molecule applied topically.
Acknowledgment
Difa Cooper Spa, IFC Group, supported this trial with an
unrestricted grant.
Author contributions
AS conducted the trial performing visits and instrumental
evaluations. MM was involved in study protocol design.
Both authors contributed toward data analysis, drafting and
critically revising the paper and agree to be accountable for
all aspects of the work.
Disclosure
MM is an employee of Cantabria Lab, Difa Cooper. The other
author reports no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
1. Slominski A, Baker J, Rosano TG, et al. Metabolism of serotonin to
N-acetylserotonin, melatonin, and 5-methoxytryptamine in hamster
skin culture. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(21):12281–12286.
2. Slominski A, Wortsman J, Tobin DJ. The cutaneous serotoninergic⁄
melatoninergic system: securing a place under the sun. FASEB J.
2005;19(2):176–194.
3. Slominski RM, Reiter RJ, Schlabritz-Loutsevitch N, Ostrom RS,
Slominski AT. Melatonin membrane receptors in peripheral tissues:
distribution and functions. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012;351(2):152–166.
4. Slominski A, Chassalevris N, Mazurkiewicz J, Maurer M, Paus R.
Murine skin as a target for melatonin bioregulation. Exp Dermatol.
1994;3(1):45–50.
5. Pandi-Perumal SR, Srinivasan V, Maestroni GJ, Cardinali DP, Poeggeler
B, Hardeland R. Melatonin: nature’s most versatile biological signal?
FEBS J. 2006;273(13):2813–2838.
6. Tunali T, Sener G, Yarat A, Emekli N. Melatonin reduces oxidative
damage to skin and normalizes blood coagulation in a rat model of
thermal injury. Life Sci. 2005;76(11):1259–1265.
7. Slominski AT, Kleszczyński K, Semak I, et al. Local melatoninergic
system as the protector of skin integrity. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(10):
17705–17732.
8. Bangha E, Elsner P, Kistler GS. Suppression of UV-induced er ythema by
topical treatment with melatonin (N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine). Influ-
ence of the application time point. Dermatology. 1997;195(3):248–252.
9. Kim TK, Kleszczynski K, Janjetovic Z, et al. Metabolism of melatonin
and biological activity of intermediates of melatoninergic pathway in
human skin cells. FASEB J. 2013;27(7):2742–2755.
10. Fischer T, Wigger-Alberti W, Elsner P. Melatonin in dermatology.
Experimental and clinical aspects. Hautarzt. 1999;50(1):5–11.
11. Slominski AT, Semak I, Fischer TW, et al. Metabolism of melatonin in
the skin: why is it important? Exp Dermatol. 2017;26(7):563–568.
12. Kleszczynski K, Fisher TW. Melatonin and human skin aging. Derma-
toendocrinol. 2012;4(3):245–252.
13. Lane EA, Moss HB. Pharmacokinetics of melatonin in man: first pass
hepatic metabolism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1985;61(6):1214–1216.
14. DeMuro RL, Nafziger AN, Blask DE, Menhinick AM, Bertino JS
Jr. The absolute bioavailability of oral melatonin. J Clin Pharmacol.
2000;40(7):781–784.
15. Fischer TW, Greif C, Fluhr JW, Wigger-Alberti W, Elsner P. Percutaneous
penetration of topically applied melatonin in a cream and an alcoholic
solution. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2004;17(4):190–194.
16. Domb AJ. Lipospheres for controlled delivery of substances. Micro-
encapsulation: Methods and Industrial Applications. Abingdon, UK:
CRC Press. 2005:297.
17. World Medical Association, et al. Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Prin-
ciples for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. 2008. Available
from: http://www.who.int/bulletin/archives/79%284%29373.pdf.
18. Glogau RG. Photoaging and aging skin. Basic Clin Dermatol.
2004;28:65–72.
19. Monheit GD, Gendler EC, Poff B, et al. Development and validation
of a 6-point grading scale in patients undergoing correction of naso-
labial folds with a collagen implant. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36(suppl
3):1809–1816.
20. Sparavigna A, Tenconi B, De Ponti I, Guglielmini G. Evaluation of the
activity and tolerability of a cosmetic treatment for the periocular area
on the aging face: controlled clinical and instrumental evaluation vs.
placebo. Cosmetics. 2014;1(2):105–116.
21. Tan DX, Chen LD, Poeggeler B, Manchester LC, Reiter RJ. Mela-
tonin: a potent, endogenous hydroxyl radical scavenger. Endocr J.
1993;1:57–60.
22. Fischer TW, Scholz G, Knoll B, Hipler UC, Elsner P. Melatonin
suppresses reactive oxygen species in UV-irradiated leukocytes
more than vitamin C and trolox. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol.
2002;15(5):367–373.
23. Car rillo-Vico A, Calvo JR, Abreu P, et al. Evidence of melatonin synthe-
sis by human lymphocytes and its physiological significance: possible
role as intracrine, autocrine, and ⁄ or paracrine substance. FASEB J.
2004;18(3):537–539.
24. Tan DX, Manchester LC, Reiter RJ, et al. Identification of highly
elevated levels of melatonin in bone marrow: its origin and significance.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1472(1–2):206–214.
25. Fischer TW, Sweatman TW, Semak I, Sayre RM, Wortsman J, Slominski
A. Constitutive and UV-induced metabolism of melatonin in keratino-
cytes and cell-free systems. FASEB J. 2006;20(9):1564–1566.
26. Slominski A, Pisarchik A, Semak I, et al. Serotoninergic and melatonin-
ergic systems are fully expressed in human skin. FASEB J. 2002;16(8):
896–898.
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology downloaded from https://www.dovepress.com/ by 168.151.238.25 on 25-Jan-2018
For personal use only.
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) 1 / 1
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology 2018:11 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
Dovepress
Dovepress
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
Publish your work in this journal
Submit your manuscript here: https://www.dovepress.com/clinical-cosmetic-and-investigational-dermatology-journal
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology is an interna-
tional, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal that focuses on
the latest clinical and experimental research in all aspects of skin
disease and cosmetic interventions. This journal is included
on PubMed. The manuscript management system is completely online
and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system, which is all easy
to use. Visit http://www.dovepress.com/testimonials.php to read real
quotes from published authors
Dovepress
57
Antiaging efcacy of melatonin-based day and night creams
27. Kim TK, Lin Z, Tidwell WJ, Li W, Slominski AT. Melatonin and its
metabolites accumulate in the human epidermis in vivo and inhibit
proliferation and tyrosinase activity in epidermal melanocytes in vitro.
Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2015;404:1–8.
28. Slominski A, Fischer TW, Zmijewski MA, et al. On the role of melatonin
in skin physiology and pathology. Endocrine. 2005;27(2):137–148.
29. Fischer TW, Scholz G, Knoll B, Hipler UC, Elsner P. Melatonin reduces
UV induced reactive oxygen species in a dose-dependent manner in
IL-3-stimulated leukocytes. J Pineal Res. 2001;31(1):39–45.
30. Mayo JC, Sainz RM, Antoli I, Herrera F, Martin V, Rodriguez C. Mela-
tonin regulation of antioxidant enzyme gene expression. Cell Mol Life
Sci. 2002;59(10):1706–1713.
31. Rodriguez C, Mayo JC, Sainz RM, et al. Regulation of antioxidant
enzymes: a significant role for melatonin. J Pineal Res. 2004;36(1):
1–9.
32. Sliwinski T, Rozej W, Morawiec-Bajda A, Morawiec Z, Reiter R,
Blasiak J. Protective action of melatonin against oxidative DNA dam-
age – chemical inactivation versus base-excision repair. Mutat Res.
2007;634(1):220–227.
33. Slominski AT, Zmijewski MA, Semak I, et al. Melatonin, mitochondria,
and the skin. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017;74(21):3913–3925.
34. Fischer TW, Zmijewski MA, Wortsman J, Slominski A. Melatonin
maintains mitochondrial membrane potential and attenuates activation
of initiator (casp-9) and effector caspases (casp-3 ⁄ casp-7) and PARP in
UVR-exposed HaCaT keratinocytes. J Pineal Res. 2008;44(4):397–407.
35. Armstrong SM, Redman JR. Melatonin: a chronobiotic with anti-aging
properties? Med Hypotheses. 1991;34(4):300–309.
36. Fischer TW, Slominski A, Zmijewski MA, Reiter RJ, Paus R. Melatonin
as a major skin protectant: from free radical scavenging to DNA damage
repair. Exp Dermatol. 2008;17(9):713–730.
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology downloaded from https://www.dovepress.com/ by 168.151.238.25 on 25-Jan-2018
For personal use only.
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) 1 / 1