ArticlePDF Available

Challenges for rural school leaders in a developing context: A case study on leadership practices of effective rural principals

Authors:

Abstract

School leaders in all settings require suitable integration of leadership knowledge and skills to respond effectively to the many challenges that beset them in their daily work. However, it is argued that the rural context creates additional and distinctive challenges for school leaders, as rural schools have unique challenges and traits that differentiate them markedly from those in urban areas. To help understand how rural leaders in rural schools deal with the challenges and complexity in their work five schools were selected for the study. A qualitative research paradigm was selected. The selection process involved a purposive sample. Three of the five principals on whom the case studies were based were in their first year and the other two, were in their third and fourth year as a permanent teaching principal, respectively. Principals were interviewed using semi-structured, in-depth interviews. It was found that the desirability of principals acquiring a rural lens as a strategy for enhancing leadership has important implications for their initial preparation and also for their ongoing professional training. https://doi.org/10.19108/KOERS.82.3.2337
2017 | https://doi.org/10.19108/KOERS.82.3.2337 Page 1 of 10
Original Research www.koersjournal.org.za
AUTHOR:
Pierre du Plessis
AFFILIATION:
Faculty of Education University of
Johannesburg
CORRESPONDENCE TO:
Pierre du Plessis
EMAIL:
pierredp@uj.ac.za
POSTAL ADDRESS:
University of Johannesburg, Faculty
of Education, Auckland Park Campus,
Kingsway Avenue , Auckland Park,
2006
DATES:
Published: 27 Dec 2017
HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE:
du Plessis, P., 2017. Challenges for
rural school leaders in a developing
context: A case study on leadership
practices of eective rural principals.
KOERS — Bulletin for Christian
Scholarship, 82(3). Available at: https://
doi.org/10.19108/KOERS.82.3.2337
COPYRIGHT:
© 2017. The Author(s).
Published under the Creative
Commons Attribution License.
CHALLENGES FOR RURAL SCHOOL
LEADERS IN A DEVELOPING
CONTEXT: A CASE STUDY ON
LEADERSHIP PRACTICES OF
EFFECTIVE RURAL PRINCIPALS
ABSTRACT
School leaders in all settings require suitable integration of leadership knowledge and skills to
respond eectively to the many challenges that beset them in their daily work. However, it is
argued that the rural context creates additional and distinctive challenges for school leaders,
as rural schools have unique challenges and traits that dierentiate them markedly from those
in urban areas. To help understand how rural leaders in rural schools deal with the challenges
and complexity in their work five schools were selected for the study. A qualitative research
paradigm was selected. The selection process involved a purposive sample. Three of the five
principals on whom the case studies were based were in their first year and the other two were
in their third and fourth year as a permanent teaching principal, respectively. Principals were
interviewed using semi-structured, in-depth interviews.
It was found that the desirability of principals acquiring a rural lens as a strategy for enhancing
leadership has important implications for their initial preparation and also for their ongoing
professional training.
Keywords: Principal, development, leadership, challenge, rural school.
1. INTRODUCTION
This study examined the leadership practices of rural school principals who have led
their schools to signicant improvements in learner academic achievement. It is argued
that the rural context creates additional and distinctive challenges for school leaders.
These unique challenges, in turn (Arnold, 2004), impede school leaders’ attempts to carry
out their multifaceted roles eectively. Sustained improvement in learners’ academic
performance is placed more at risk, with an ever-widening learning outcomes gap
between rural and urban learners (Lamkin, 2006). Nobody much cares to talk about
the challenge of educating poor rural learners. In reality poverty’s eect as a cultural
condition does not discriminate on geography; it matters little whether a learner levels
in single-wide trailer or in a double-story house. What does matter is this: the challenge
of educating our country’s poor rural children has not received the attention it deserves
(Lamkin, 2006). Most of what we know about eective leadership practice, the type of
practice that leads to meaningful (Arnold, 2004) academic reform has been gleaned from
studying urban and suburban school leaders. Conversely, the leadership practices of
rural school principals have generated little academic interest and even less scholarship.
As a result, there exists a signicant gap in the knowledge base regarding the work and
practice of eective rural school leaders.
In 2006, Waters and Marzano published their meta-analysis of eective school leadership
practice. In this authoritative work, Waters and Marzano reviewed hundreds of previous
studies on school leadership in order to identify those certain leadership practices
that could be directly linked with improving learner achievement. In the end, their
research identied six specic leadership responsibilities or correlates that were linked
in a statistically signicant way, to improved levels of learner achievement. Waters and
2017 | https://doi.org/10.19108/KOERS.82.3.2337 Page 2 of 10
Original Research www.koersjournal.org.za
Marzano’s six correlates now present the current standard for eective school leadership
practice. Today’s school principals are accountable for learner performance on high stake
assessments regardless of disparities in resources (Clarke & Wildy, 2004). To promote and
positively inuence student success, principals must understand the factors that inuence
success, and must reect upon and working towards improving their practice (Starr & White,
2008). Principals must also possess an understanding of the context in which they work in
order to meet the needs of the learners and community to which they are accountable
(Riley, 2013).
2. PROBLEM STATEMENT
The accountability movement has resulted in increased demands on principal leaders.
School principals are expected to serve as instructional leaders for their schools by devoting
time and attention to teacher evaluation, curriculum and assessment development and
student achievement data analysis (Monk, 2007). At the same time, principals continue to
serve as managers of their schools. They create schedules, supervise sta, and in many cases
call substitutes. Despite increased responsibility for instruction and student achievement,
principals continue to spend more than 60% of their time on managerial tasks (Robinson,
Hohepe & Lloyd, 2009).
Rural circumstances create challenges for rural school principals. Rural school districts
often are not able to oer learners the same resources oered in suburban, and sometimes
urban, school districts (Oakes & Maday, 2009). Although rural school communities are
characterised by benets such as smaller schools, close-knit communities and strong
relationships between learners and teachers, rural school, districts and communities face
a number of barriers to achieving academic success. These barriers include lack of funding,
diculty in recruiting and retaining highly qualied teachers, outdated facilities, limited
technology, and a community culture that does not value higher education (Jimmerson,
2005). Lack of resources and limited advanced course oerings in rural school districts,
according to Halsey (2011) have been linked with academic performance decits.
High-stakes testing creates stress and frustration in schools that are struggling to meet
achievement benchmarks. The level of concern is compounded in rural schools, where
resources to improve student achievement are not readily available (Starr & White, 2008).
Regardless of uncontrollable factors that negatively inuence learner achievement,
accountability for learner success as measured by standardised tests rests with the school
principal.
3. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY
The purpose of the study was to examine the leadership practices and challenges of rural
school principals. The principals who were the focus of this case study had a track record of
academic improvement and increased learner achievement in schools they had previously
led. The reason for doing the study will also provide some contextual background to the
article. The rst is their numerical signicance: a large number of schools in the Limpopo
province fall into the category of rural schools, led by a principal who has a substantial
teaching commitment. According to Southworth (2004), principals of rural schools tend
to have more direct inuence on the quality of teaching, providing them with powerful
opportunities to bring about change and improvement.
Rural schools particularly when they are remote or isolated can be vulnerable if their
communities decline in employment opportunities and infrastructure (Pegg, 2007). Thus
from a social justice perspective it is vital that principals located in rural and isolated
environments are able to take full advantage of powerful opportunities for change and
improvement because parents and learners may have little opinion but to accept the
2017 | https://doi.org/10.19108/KOERS.82.3.2337 Page 3 of 10
Original Research www.koersjournal.org.za
educational provision on oer from the local school. Considering the exigencies of
recognising, clarifying and valuing leadership of rural schools, the dearth of research into
leadership of these organisations (Southworth, 2004) is surprising and provides another
reason for the interest on investigating leadership in this specic context.
4. RATIONALE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
Educational researchers have long sought to establish a correlation between eective
principal leadership and student achievement. The assertion that principals impact student
achievement is widely accepted; the inuence of the principal on student achievement,
though indirect, has been found to be second only to the inuence of the teacher (Johnson
& Strange, 2007). A review of historical research on principal leadership indicated that
beliefs and expectations about the role of the principal in South Africa in the last decades
were reective of the nation’s political and social conditions at the time, according to Monk
(2007). As the importance of student achievement moved to the forefront, the principal’s
role was redened with an increasing focus on instructional leadership. However, despite
principals increasing accountability for student achievement, management responsibilities
continued (Catano & Strange, 2006).
The study was designed to contribute to the body of knowledge on leadership practices of
eective rural principals. Studies point to the importance of understanding the inuence of
context in principal leadership. Though much time and attention have been devoted to the
study of principal leadership in urban schools and districts, research on principal leadership
for academic success in rural schools and districts is not prevalent (Oakes & Maday, 2009).
In the nation’s current accountability system, nding out what principals do to eect
student achievement is of prime importance to educational leaders. Johnson and Strange
(2007) argued that research was needed that explored how leaders responded exibility to
manage their schools and to create conditions for learner success.
5. METHODOLOGY
This study uses a qualitative research approach. For the qualitative researcher, the goal
is to seek answers to questions that stress how social experience is created and given
meaning (Denzin & Lincoln, 2003; Lingam, 2012). This study of leadership practices of
eective principals lends itself to the qualitative methods precisely because gaining a better
understanding of what constitutes eective leadership practice is by nature a subjective
value- laden pursuit.
Marshall and Rossman (2006) describe qualitative research as a broad approach to the
study of a social phenomenon. They described the characteristics of qualitative research
as: (a) taking place in the natural world, (b) using multiple methods that are interactive
and humanistic, (c) focussing on context, (d) being emergent rather than tightly pregured,
and (e) being fundamentally interpretive. The study of leadership practices of eective
principals reects many of these same characteristics. First, principal leadership takes place
in the natural or real world and not in a scientic laboratory. Thus it would be appropriate
to approach this study of school leadership within that same natural setting. The study of
school principal leadership practices within certain Lephalale rural schools in the Limpopo
province, where learner academic achievement has improved over the past ve years,
provides a unique contextual focus.
This study’s intent is to gain special insight through rst-person accounts of the ways in
which individuals experience school leadership in rural schools where learner achievement
is on the rise. In this fashion, this study views the question of eective leadership practices
through the experiences of both school principals and the people who observe their work. By
2017 | https://doi.org/10.19108/KOERS.82.3.2337 Page 4 of 10
Original Research www.koersjournal.org.za
studying the phenomenon of eective rural principals who lead schools through a process
of rising student achievement and asking them to share their leadership experiences, a case
study approach with a phenomenological lens best uncover useful, pragmatic insights into
the leadership practices of these successful principals.
According to Stake (2003), the most unique aspect of case study research lies in the
selection of the particular cases to be studied. Because the goal is to select those cases
that provide the best opportunity to learn, qualitative researchers often use purposeful
sampling (Creswell, 2007). With purposeful sampling, the researcher purposefully selects
those individuals and sites for study that hold the greatest potential for providing a better
understanding of a study’s research problem and central phenomenon. For this study, the
criterion-based methodology was used. The subject pool consisted of all the rural schools
in the Lephalale school district in the Limpopo province. Twenty one principals were invited
to take part. Through the criterion- based methodology the sample was narrowed to ve
school principals.
The case study approach to qualitative analysis is a specic way of collecting, organising
and analysing data (Stake, 2003). Standardisation, open-ended interviews were the primary
source of data collection for this research study. Interviews were conducted on each of the
ve rural Lephalale school sites with each principal. Additionally, interviews, was conducted
with at least one principal, teacher and a school governing body member from each school.
Each interview was approximately 45–60 minutes in length, audio taped and transcribed
for analytical purposes. According to Horst and Martin (2007), the goal of the case records
is to take the reader into the case situation in this instance the working lives of each of the
ve principals.
Triangulation serves to clarify the meaning of the data collected for the researcher by
identifying dierent ways the phenomenon is being seen (Stake, 2003; Creswell, 2007). In this
regard, the study collected data through multiple sources (principals, teacher and governing
body member) and multiple data types (interview, observation and written communication)
instead of relying strictly on interviews with the ve principals. Data analysis in qualitative
research follows a familiar pattern (Barley & Beesley, 2007). Data is collected, analysed,
coded and sorted into themes. These themes are then presented in table or gure form
and published for discussion (Creswell, 2007). For this study, participant interviews served
as the primary source of data. Each participant’s interviewed information was transcribed
and analysed for citations related to specic leadership practices. Data analysis focussed
on examining thematic similarities and dierences in leadership practice among the study’s
ve principal subjects. For this study, the thematic focus was on identifying those principal’s
practices and habits that have helped a select group of rural school leaders improve learner
academic performance in their schools.
The interviews transcripts were reviewed and references to specic leadership practices
were highlighted and identied. In total, 223 specic citations were identied among the 15
interviews. For data verication and authentication purposes, each leadership practice had
to have been cited by at least two interview participants in order to be recognised for this
study. The most frequently referenced practices are listed in Table 1.
Table 1 : Most frequently cited principal leadership practices
Practice Citations
Teaching sta develops school’s curriculum 24
Has an open door policy 22
No limitations to principal’s authority 21
Encourages professional development for teachers 20
2017 | https://doi.org/10.19108/KOERS.82.3.2337 Page 5 of 10
Original Research www.koersjournal.org.za
Classroom management and discipline 19
Teaching strategies and delivery 17
Teacher motivation 13
Teacher recruitment 12
Student achievement data is analysed for GAPS 11
Secures money for technology upgrades 9
6. DISCUSSION
The data revealed a few interesting facts regarding leadership practices. Several references
to teacher motivation and teacher recruitment were expected, several practices contained
in Table 1 were not expected. The practice on the principal’s authority was sited 21 times –
the third highest in the study. Most of the ve principals responded in a manner similar to
that given by Principal B. “We can make any decision as long as we take responsibility for it.
All our actions are based on trust, performance and respect”.
Principal E said that “Although we are going to make mistakes in making decisions, to trust
us make a world of dierence”. This sentiment is echoed by Steyn (2012) in saying that
new conditions and expectations in education can create new challenges and perspectives
for the role of the principal. “My principal is a man you can trust at all times and takes
responsibility for most things at our school”, one teacher commented.
The highest leadership practice “Teaching sta develops school’s curriculum” has reference.
In order for curriculum planning to be eective, the school curriculum must address the
school’s needs both at local level and also as articulated in the education policy. School
curriculum planning works on developing an awareness of these needs, not only in terms
of managing the local environment of the school, but also in terms of the wider needs of the
learners as members of society.
Principal C indicated that she aims at the holistic development of learners who attend
the school. In order to achieve this aim “I expect proper and systematic planning from
teachers including lesson plans and scheme of work”. One teacher at the same school (C)
indicated that when “I came to this school I went to class without any written lesson plan,
but the principal identied the gaps and expects interactive teaching and full involvement
of learners in the teaching learning process”.
Another teacher said that “the principal is actively involved in curriculum planning, and he
expects us to take extra responsibilities and leadership roles in developing the curriculum”.
The principals in the study, conveyed their expectation regarding curriculum development,
to teachers (through planned class visits, sta meetings, individual meetings and planning
sessions).
“It is not easy to be the instructional leader” principal D said. He explained that principals
often travel to district oces to make administrative arrangements. The more remote the
school is, the longer the principal is away from the school, and the less time spent by the
principal on supervising curriculum structuring and planning. Mulkeen (2005) indicated that
principals might have curriculum structuring and planning problems in rural areas for the
above mentioned reason.
“We are not visited by ocials from district very often and therefore the principal became
the curriculum leader for us” one governing body member said. Teachers indicated that
they planned the curriculum according to the needs of the schools. School curriculum
planning works on developing an awareness of these needs, not only in terms of managing
the local environment of the school but also in terms of the wider needs of the learners.
2017 | https://doi.org/10.19108/KOERS.82.3.2337 Page 6 of 10
Original Research www.koersjournal.org.za
Principals in the study help teachers to perform as designer and implementer of instruction.
Teachers at every level prepare plans that aid in the organisation and delivery of their
daily lessons. Regardless of the format, all teachers need to make wise decisions about
the strategies and methods they will employ to help learners move systematically toward
learner goals. Principal E indicated that “the more organised a teacher is, the more eective
the teaching and learning that would take place. Remember I am teaching as well, because
of the small school. So I need to be on top of my game as well, regarding curriculum”.
A third cited leadership practice was has an open door policy. Principal B said “whether it be
a learner, a parent or a teacher, I am always willing to discuss issues they might have. At rst
people were scared to come to my oce but they are not afraid of me anymore, and I think
it rubs o on teachers and parents”.
A forth leadership practice, viz. Encourage the professional development of teachers, highly
inuences the practices and attitude of the teachers. Teachers from all the schools in
the study said that a teacher could not be able to develop lesson plans and to teach in
an interactive way if he/she lacks pedagogical knowledge. Though some teachers in the
schools have pre-service professional qualications, principals encourage them to further
their studies. “Even with a qualication teachers have not developed their required
pedagogical skills due to some deciencies in the curriculum and assessment procedure of
the institutions oering these courses (Principal D)”.
“With the limited money we have available for professional development the principal tries
hard to send at least two teachers every year for in-service programs” one governing body
member commented. Whereas teachers lack updated professional knowledge, school
based teacher development activities provide the best opportunity for teachers to develop
themselves professionally (Lingam, 2012).
All principals in the study expect that teachers should collaborate with one another and
consult the principal if they have teaching and learning issues. The sta meetings, some
planning sessions, and sharing expertise at classroom level were the examples of in-house
teacher development activities and collaboration given by the principals.
A fth leadership practice Classroom management and discipline in rural areas present
additional diculties for school principals. One concern is that teacher absenteeism, which
may be very high in rural areas, could perhaps create serious constraints on eective
classroom management and discipline. Medical problems of teachers in isolated areas may
also weaken the control and discipline of teachers. A visit to a doctor which might take an
hour or two in an urban area, can involve an absence of three days for a rural teacher.
“It will be unfair to see all classroom diculties in terms of policing, teacher misbehaviour”
principal A said. “Systems fail teachers and can undermine teacher morale for example
failure to pay teachers on time and a delay in promotion” (Principal E). That is why my
“governing body chairperson and I try everything we can to see that teachers get their
salary on time and if they are transferred to another school, everything runs smoothly”,
according to principal D. Teachers in rural areas often feel neglected by the authorities.
Such perceptions may lower morale among rural teachers and deepen management and
discipline problems (Burke, Marx & Knowenstein, 2012).
A sixth leadership practice referred to teacher motivation and the extent to which teachers
are motivated is a signicant factor in inuencing the delivery of quality education according
to Riley (2013). A good working environment according to Herzberg’s two factor theory
(motivation and hygiene), will determine the quantity and quality of knowledge children
receive, the level of skills to enhance the development of young minds; and the sense of
security learners feel. ”The diculties we have in rural schools, make it not easy to motivate
teachers and to retain teachers in rural schools. We are trying to make working conditions
2017 | https://doi.org/10.19108/KOERS.82.3.2337 Page 7 of 10
Original Research www.koersjournal.org.za
as attractive as possible and to keep our sta happy and hope they will stay at our school”,
according to Principal B.
Working conditions have continually played a large role in teacher decisions to migrate or
leave the profession (Jimmerson, 2005). “We hope by assisting teachers with administrative
support, resources if available and with decision-making, it will help to motivate them”,
most of the principals echoed.
A seventh leadership practice is teacher recruitment. In tough economic times, money, or the
lack thereof, can be a key deterrent when enticing quality educators to a rural school. Rural
teachers also reportedly feel unprepared to meet the array of unique needs of learners in
these communities (Semke & Sheridan, 2012; Strange, 2011).
“Our principal leaves cards with positive notes on our tables in the class room, and even
mail some motivating notes to our homes to keep us motivated” one teacher commented.
“My principal is a respected person in the community and she listens and respects us”,
another teacher said. One governing body member (School B) indicated that they meet with
universities to identify nal year students that will t into rural schools and communities.
An eighth leadership practice student achievement data is analysed for gaps. All principals
indicated that they now use test results data to improve on teaching and learning. They
encourage teachers to use the data from assessment tasks and tests or examinations to set
new targets for their respective subjects.
The ninth leadership practice is to secure money for technology upgrades. Teachers should be
able to utilize information-communication technology (ICT) as teaching and learning tools
(Monk, 2007). However, this is still not feasible in many of the rural schools where basic
amenities such as electricity supply are still inaccessible.
“We do not have many computers, but we try and keep up with technology in sending
our teachers for computer training. The ideal is to have more computers and teaching
programmes so that learners can benet as well” (Principal E, teacher). “It is not easy
because we do not have the money to support us in improving technology” (governing body
member from school C).
It is imperative that appreciable numbers of new teaching positions - many of which will
be in rural areas, need to be lled and equipped with modern facilities that will make rural
teachers teach with ease (Clarke & Wildy, 2004).
7. RECOMMENDATIONS
As education in the accountability era continues to evolve, rural school principals will be
expected to ensure that all learners demonstrate academic achievement at increasing
levels of prociency. Distinguished levels of leadership will be required in order for rural
educational leaders to meet the rigorous demands placed upon them. Rural school
principals will need to balance leadership responsibilities and priorities, while at the same
time building sta trust and relationships, to sustain educational outcomes for all learners.
A good plan has to address poverty and sustainable development, as well as promoting
social cohesion that is, the need to work together to solve problems (Oakes & Maday,
2009).
In order to improve a rural school coupled with the motivation of teachers, both the principal
and the teachers need further professional and pedagogical skills to perform their expected
roles more eectively. The study demonstrated that the specic leadership practices
presented in Table 1 provided a comprehensive foundation for evaluating rural school
leadership. This framework of leadership practices should be considered by educational
2017 | https://doi.org/10.19108/KOERS.82.3.2337 Page 8 of 10
Original Research www.koersjournal.org.za
leaders as a foundation for professional assessment, self-assessment and for planning
professional growth for building rural school principals.
Professional development for school leaders at both the local school district and university
levels should focus on both the learning-centred leadership framework and on change
principles. If education systems as a whole are to embrace a constructive approach (Lewis,
2003) to succession planning in rural and remote districts, it is helpful to refer to the notion of
the rural lens. Policy makers and administrators who examine the implications of succession
planning through a rural lens must be more inclined to consider the distinctiveness of
rural and remote communities in order to rethink ways in which appropriate educational
leadership can be nurtured with these environments. These strategies should include a re-
examination of how rural principals are currently prepared, developed and supported to
work in rural communities, so they are more likely to nd such postings appealing and are
better equipped to make a dierence to the performance and vitality of the schools they
serve.
There must be provision for job-embedded and real-time opportunities for teachers to
improve their practice and connect professionally, observing and co-teaching with others,
sharing successful strategies and lessons learned, and visiting other schools. Leaders need
to nd eective, rural-specic responses to address them.
8. CONCLUSION
The study investigated the challenges for rural school principals and the leadership practices
they implement for eective schooling. Rural schools face many challenges that do not exist
in urban areas, such as geographic isolation, poor working conditions of teachers, lack of
resources and poor community involvement.
Given that the school leaders have highlighted the challenges they face in their work, the
authorities concerned cannot be complacent; they must try to take constructive steps to
make rural education as attractive and eective as possible.
Provision of teaching resources and supply of well-qualied teachers together with adequate
funding would make a signicant contribution to facilitating the work of rural school leaders
and in achieving school eectiveness and improvement.
2017 | https://doi.org/10.19108/KOERS.82.3.2337 Page 9 of 10
Original Research www.koersjournal.org.za
9. REFERENCES
Arnold, M.L. 2004. Guiding rural schools and districts: A research agenda. Washington, D.C.
Institute of Educational Services. Retrieved from http://www.edpubs.org.
Barley, Z.A., Beesley, A.D. 2007. Rural school success: What can we learn? Journal of Research
in Rural Education, 22(1), 1-16.
Burke, W., Marx, G.E. & Knowenstein, E. 2012. Leading leadership and learning exploring
new contexts for leadership developments in engaging school environments. Planning and
changing, 424, 113-126.
Catano, N. & Strange, J.H. 2006. What are principals expected to do? Congruence between
principal evaluation and performance standards. NASSP Bulletin, 90 (3), 221-237.
Clarke, S. & Wildy, H. 2004. Context counts: Viewing small school leadership from the inside
out. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(5), 555-572.
Creswell, J.W. 2007. Educational Research: Planning conducting and evaluating quantitative
and qualitative research (3rd ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. 2003. Strategies of qualitative inquiring (2nd ed). Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Halsey, J. 2011. Small schools, big future. Australian Journal of Education, 35(1), 5-13.
Horst, M.D. & Martin, B.N. 2007. A case study: Leadership and its eect on achievement of
children from poverty in rural setting. The Rural Educator, 28(3), 33-40.
Jimmerson, J. 2005. Special challenges of the No Child Left Behind act for rural schools and
districts. The Rural Educator, 27(2), 1-4.
Johnson, J. & Strange, M. 2007. Why rural matters. The realities of rural education growth.
Washington, D.C. The Rural Schools and Community Trust.
Lamkin, M.L. 2006. Challenges and changes faced by rural superintendents. The Rural
Educator, 28(1), 17-24.
Lewis, A.C. 2003. Rural Schools. The Education Digest, 68(8), 69-71.
Lingam, G.I. 2012. Preparing teachers for rural schools. An empirical evidence from a Fiji
case. Greener Journal of Educational Research, 2(2), 001-012.
Marshall, C. & Rossman, G.B. 2006. Designing qualitative research (4th ed). Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
Monk, D. 2007. Recruiting and returning high-quality teachers in rural areas. Future of
Children, 17(1), 155-174.
Mulkeen, A. 2005. Teachers for Rural Schools: A challenge for Africa. Working Paper. Biennale
on Education in Africa (Libreville, March 27 – 31, 2006). Association for the Development of
Education in Africa.
Oakes, A. & Maday, T. 2009. Engaging Native American learners with rigor and cultural
relevance. Washington, D.D. the Centre for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement.
Pegg, J. 2007. Developing a national, holistic approach to addressing issues in rural and
2017 | https://doi.org/10.19108/KOERS.82.3.2337 Page 10 of 10
Original Research www.koersjournal.org.za
regional schools education. In N. Rees, D. Boyd, & E. Terry (eds), 23rd Rural Education
Conference Proceedings, pp2-14. Perth: SPERA.
Riley, K.A. 2013. Walking the leadership tightrope: Building community cohesiveness and
social capital in schools in highly disadvantaged urban communities. British Educational
Research Journal, 39(2), 266-286.
Robinson, V., Hohepe, M. & Lloyd, C. 2009. School leadership and student outcomes.
Identifying what works and why. Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration (BES) Wellington Ministry
of Education.
Semke, C.A. & Sheridan, S.M. 2012. Family-School Connections in Rural Educational Settings.
A systematic Review of the Empirical School Community Journal, 22(1), 2147.
Southworth, G. 2004. Primary school leadership in context: Leading small medium and large
sized schools. London & New York: Routledge Palmer.
Stake, R.E. 2003. Case studies. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds), Strategies of qualitative
inquiry (2nd ed). pp134-164. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Starr, K. & White, S. 2008. The small rural school principalship. Key challenges and cross-
school responses: Journal of Research in Rural Education, 23 (5), 1-12.
Steyn, G.M. 2012. The changing Principalship in South African Schools. From http:UIFUNISA.
AC.ZA
Strange, M. (2011). Finding fairness for rural students. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(6), 8-15.
... leading curriculum and policy development and implementation, 2) supporting and monitoring (du Plessis, 2017;Hallinger, 2005). At Crocodile High School, members of the SMT who participated in the study perceived leading the curriculum and implementing policies of the ...
... This understanding also ignores teacher perspectives and contextual challenges or opportunities that may lead to innovation and improved outcomes. Literature on effective school leadership indicates that effective instructional leaders lead teacher curriculum development to fit the needs and opportunities of the context of the school, rather than rigidly following national curricula (Carl, 2012;du Plessis, 2017;Hallinger, 2005). As Leithwood et al., (2020) assert: ...
... Third, to overcome the challenges of rurality, the SMT members must prioritise instructional leadership practices (Bhengu et al, 2014;du Plessis, 2017;Mestry, 2018). Informed by these assumptions, in this study, I sought to examine how members of the SMT in this rural school understood and enacted their instructional leadership roles. ...
Thesis
Full-text available
The study reported in this thesis aimed to examine the understandings and practices of instructional leadership the School Management Team (SMT) at one rural school I named Crocodile High School located in Moletsi in the Limpopo Province, South Africa. The study was premised on the understanding that if schools such as Crocodile High School are to overcome the multitude of challenges they experience, the SMT must play a vital instructional leadership role. Thus, the study sought to understand how SMT members understood their instructional leadership roles and enacted them, and how rurality, impacted on their understandings and practices of instructional leadership. The study was located in the interpretive paradigm and adopted qualitative research methodology. The SMT members in the school made up the primary study participants, with a group of six teachers making up the secondary participants. To generate data I used in-depth semistructured interviews with each of the seven members of the SMT, a focus group discussion with the group, and week-long observations of each SMT member. I also carried out a focus group discussion with the six teachers to understand their perspectives on the SMT’s instructional leadership roles. To analyse the data, I used the inductive content analysis approach in which the analysis of data comes from a detailed reading and breaking down of raw data into categories, patterns and themes to explain it. The findings suggest that in many ways, members of the SMT do not have an adequate understanding of their instructional leadership role. This negatively impacts their ability to provide effective instructional leadership needed in the school. Moreover, the findings revealed that rurality had a negative impact on the SMT members’ understandings and enactment of their instructional leadership roles. They tended to focus on the lack of resources and failed to mobilise the school and community to develop or access available assets to benefit teaching and learning. Further, negative influences also came from teacher unions in the form of teacher strikes, leading to negative relationships between the SMT and teachers in the schools. However, some members were able to build rapport with teachers, and thus created a positive environment for teaching and learning. These findings have implications for professional development initiatives that target the SMT in the rural context and focuses on their understanding and enactment of instructional leadership roles. Such programmes could motivate the SMT and other participants to seek continuous professional development opportunities in order to improve their leadership. Lastly, the findings also point towards the need for teacher unions to play their part to improve their influence in schools, including on teacher professionalism and effectiveness.
... Another study discusses the creation of sustainable learning environments in South African rural schools [5]. The professional support and assistance required by principals is a topic worthy of attention [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. ...
... Many of the challenges faced by principals at small schools located in rural and remote communities also need to be addressed by principals in suburban and urban areas [31]. Fulfilling the leadership duty of a principal takes work, especially in rural schools [8,17,18,[27][28][29][30][31][32][57][58][59][60]. ...
... These principals lack financial resources, administrative assistance, and specialized staff, making leadership more complex [17]. Despite their resilience, rural principals require targeted professional support to navigate these challenges effectively and sustain educational quality [8,12,45]. Rural schools face such challenges as limited resources, teacher and student mobility, and small student populations. More support is needed to address these issues. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study aims to explore the challenges faced by principals in rural schools in Taiwan and the professional support they require to improve leadership and school management. Utilizing focus group interviews, data was collected from 16 participants (7 women and 9 men), focusing on issues such as limited cultural capital, student retention, teacher shortages, poor student performance, and insufficient school funding. This research highlights the specific challenges of teacher retention, student mobility, and administrative burdens. The key professional support identified includes targeted professional development, curriculum inspection, parental engagement, and collaboration with colleagues and experienced principals. This study suggests that creating professional development communities, fostering collaborative networks, and increasing administrative support can significantly enhance rural school leadership and improve education quality. The findings offer practical insights for policymakers to tailor support systems to meet the unique needs of rural school principals in Taiwan, drawing on successful strategies from both local and international contexts to ensure sustainable educational leadership and development.
... The school principal, as an instructional leader, should demonstrate leadership qualities by communicating the school's vision and mission to ensure that the school reaches its vision, carries out its mission, clearly outlines the instructional goals to reach targets, and effectively carries out teaching and learning activities by creating a school culture and climate conducive to learning (McEwan, 2003). Principals' involvement in monitoring learner progress within individual classrooms and across grades is a potent but underemphasised principal activity (Marishane, 2011) and executing this role effectively is a mammoth task placed on the principals' shoulders (Bafadal et al., 2019) and the contexts in which principals often find themselves in hamper them from effectively carrying out their duties (du Plessis, 2017). Principals have complex multi-faceted roles to play and regarded as team builders, instructional leaders, capacity builders, vision builders, resource managers, and instructional programme designers and directors (Marishane, 2011). ...
... The school enrolment in rural schools ranges between 30 and 120 learners which means that school sizes are often extremely small. Rural schools, districts, and villages can offer advantages such as vital connections between students and teachers and small-town atmospheres (du Plessis, 2017). However, literature has identified challenges that rural schools face. ...
Article
Full-text available
School leadership is regarded as the cornerstone of the successful provisioning of quality education. This qualitative study draws from principals' accounts of their instructional leadership challenges in rural multigrade schools. The research, situated within an interpretivist paradigm and the theoretical lens of instructional leadership, sought to understand the challenges that principals experience as instructional leaders and how they mitigate the challenges they experience in their rural contexts. Ten purposively selected principals from rural multigrade schools situated in the Vhembe district of Limpopo province participated in the study. Data were generated through semi-structured interviews and were analysed using thematic analysis. The findings show that principals in rural multigrade schools do not participate in induction training to equip them with the knowledge and skill to commence their roles as principals. As a result, they struggle to balance their teaching and management roles. However, fostering teamwork with teachers may be a strategy that could assist principals in managing and successfully executing their duties. Lack of access to technological resources and staffing are serious concerns for the participants in their aim to provide quality education. Active parental involvement supports principals and teacher in their multigrade rural context. This study recommends that principals should undergo training for their role as principals in rural multigrade schools and training on multigrade pedagogies is recommended for both principals and teachers. Understanding challenges that principals in rural multigrade schools experience could help policymakers establish relevant policies that address leadership issues in rural schools.
... This happens when learning takes place in totality, which involves cognitive, social, and physical development (Power, 2011). In order to understand the cognitive, social, and physical development of learners, leaders must understand the context in which learning takes place (Du Plessis, 2017). ...
Article
Full-text available
The high level of inequality in South Africa has widened the gap between rural and urban schools, and the performance of rural schools has been continuously declining compared to urban schools. Poor performance in rural schools is perpetuated by parents being absent from their children’s education because the socio-economic conditions and their educational background do not allow them to commit their time and energy towards education. Learners are left on their own to decide their future. The disparity between rural and urban schooling was further exposed by the COVID-19 pandemic. As schools were closed during lockdown, teaching and learning was suspended in rural schools, however, in urban schools teaching and learning continued through online platforms. The lockdowns gave parents an opportunity to teach, advocate, and create conducive spaces to help their children focus on learning. During lockdowns, parents were expected to act as teachers in their homes to educate their children, and therefore, school closure presented opportunities for parents to actively participate in their children’s education. However, their socio-economic conditions and poor educational backgrounds continue to threaten effective parental engagement, posing a threat to the academic success of rural learners. Despite attempts by the government to introduce school governing bodies in schools as a structure to integrate schools and parents, the problem of little parental engagement remains unresolved. The purpose with this study was to empower parents in rural areas to effectively participate in their children’s education.
... It is, therefore, necessary that schools also have a voice and play an active role in local development, as their role is key and energising for the territories and their sustainability. This challenge has also been reflected in several studies placed in some rural areas that have to face stigmas and prejudices that-underestimate the value of rural life (Beach et al., 2019;Corbet, 2016;Du Plessis, 2017;Karlberg-Granlund, 2019;Restrepo et al., 2023). ...
Article
Full-text available
Las escuelas juegan un papel crucial en las zonas rurales para promover el desarrollo local, dinamizar el territorio y contribuir al arraigo de sus habitantes, sobre todo en municipios que se encuentran en proceso de despoblación. Teniendo esto en cuenta, este artículo recoge las opiniones de una amplia muestra de 110 docentes de primaria que trabajan en escuelas rurales de Cataluña, gracias al cuestionario “La escuela rural y la dimensión territorial”, y sobre los proyectos educativos realizados en colaboración con instituciones locales para promover el desarrollo territorial y enfrentar los desafíos y necesidades de las zonas rurales. Las respuestas arrojan luz sobre cómo el profesorado valora el papel de las escuelas rurales en comunidades locales y las acciones realizadas. En concreto, los resultados destacaron la posible influencia de algunos aspectos relacionados con el contenido de los proyectos que la escuela rural realiza en colaboración con las instituciones y administraciones locales y su percepción sobre el rol desempeñado por las y los agentes de ambas instituciones en el desarrollo de la dimensión territorial a través de estos proyectos compartidos. Las conclusiones hacen referencia a la importancia de tener en cuenta la participación de agentes locales en el desarrollo de la dimensión territorial desde estos proyectos, sobre todo debido a la importancia de la escuela en la promoción de la sostenibilidad de los territorios rurales. También en promover acciones que lleven a las y los estudiantes a arraigarse al lugar y a valorarlo.
Article
Full-text available
Tech use in teaching and learning has been considered as a contributory factor aiding academic success. Its lack in rural schools has also been considered as a hindrance to quality education. This study through a qualitative method explored the intersection of innovation and technology use as well as the challenges of disconnection. This was done using a selected rural school in KwaZulu-Natal province of South Africa. Data were collected from a case of a secondary school using observations, field notes and semi-structured interviews from a purposively selected sample of a principal, a head of department, six teachers and an administrative clerk. The collected data were coded, categorised and analysed thematically. The findings show among others that inequalities are due to infrastructure, socioeconomic status and location. The disparities influence how digital inequality is experienced, exposing barriers, and frustrations, through digital disconnection. The experience causes the teachers to utilise less of technology and make use of what they have. This study has shaped our discourse in digital technology theory and humanities about what technology is, what it is for, and what kind of justice we ought to seek from it.
Article
Full-text available
Amaç: Öğrenciler, öğretmenler ve eğitim liderleri arasındaki anlamlı kültürel bağların eksikliği, Siyah/Afrikalı Amerikalı ve Hispanik öğrenci popülasyonlarının akademik başarısızlığına katkıda bulunan önemli bir faktördür. Bu kopukluk, akademik başarı farkını daha da kötüleştirerek öğrencilerin ilerlemesini ve gelecek beklentilerini engeller. Etkili eğitim liderliğinin araştırmaya dayalı en iyi uygulamalarında kültürel olarak duyarlı liderliğin rolüne odaklanan literatürün sistematik bir incelemesi sağlanacaktır. Yöntemler: Bu çalışma, Sistematik İncelemeler ve Meta-Analizler için Tercih Edilen Raporlama Öğeleri'ni (PRISMA) kullanarak sistematik literatürü sunar. Aşağıdaki temel kavramlar için titiz bir arama yürütülmüştür: etkili eğitim liderliği, etkili okul liderliği uygulamaları, çeşitli öğrenci popülasyonları için liderlik ve kültürel olarak duyarlı liderlik. Sonuçlar, araştırma tabanlı liderlik uygulamalarını tanımlamak için kullanılan güncel terminolojinin bir özetini oluşturmak için kullanılmıştır. Sistematik literatür incelemesi için metodoloji titiz ve şeffaftır ve birincil araştırmalarda kullanılan standartlara benzerdir. Bulgular: Sonuçlar, kültürel olarak duyarlı liderliğin etkili eğitim liderliğine ve etkili okul liderliği uygulamalarına katkısının sınırlı olduğunu, her birinden yalnızca bir kez bahsedildiğini göstermektedir. Buna karşılık, çeşitli öğrenci grupları için etkili liderlik incelendiğinde, kavram daha sık ortaya çıkmış ve dört kez görülmüştür. Araştırma ve Uygulama İçin Sonuçlar: Bulgularımız, kültürel olarak duyarlı liderliğin etkili okul liderliği için temel bir beceri seti olarak eğitim araştırmalarına dahil edilmesi gerektiğini önermektedir. Önemi, çeşitliliği ele almanın ötesine uzanır; kapsayıcılığı teşvik etmek ve tüm öğrenci grupları için eğitim sonuçlarını geliştirmek için kapsamlı bir yaklaşımın altını çizer.
Article
Full-text available
Background Occupational well-being as an important factor affecting the stability of the rural teacher team is not only the endogenous driver for the revitalization of rural education but also the source of a good life pursued by teachers. In order to promote the improvement of teachers' occupational well-being and further explore its influencing factors. this research explores the effects of perceived principal’s instructional leadership on rural elementary and middle school teachers, teachers’ instructional efficacy, and teacher awareness of professional development on their occupational well-being. Methods Simple random sampling was conducted on rural elementary and middle school teachers from Henan and Shandong provinces in China. Furthermore, using a quantitative approach, a total of 609 valid questionnaires were collected. A structural equation model was applied to validate and analyze the data collected. Results The results show that the higher the teachers’ perceived principal’s instructional leadership, the higher their occupational well-being, and teaching efficacy and professional development awareness pay a mediating effect between perceived principal’s leadership and occupational well-being. Conclusion The principals’ practices and reflection on instructional leadership should be encouraged, and the teachers’ self-understanding ability and professional development awareness should be promoted in order to enhance their occupational well-being.
Article
Full-text available
The study concentrated on the performance of school leaders in the face of both internal and external obstacles, as well as the leadership challenges they encounter. This study found that the leadership problems faced by school heads had a substantial impact on their domain-based performance. The 52 secondary school principals employed permanently in the Schools Division of Bulacan were the subjects of the study, which employed a descriptive-correlational research design with a standard questionnaire and extensive documentary analysis. This approach supports the use of documentary data as a primary means of data collection. The outcome was processed using descriptive-correlational analysis using the Statistical Packages for Social Science (SPSS) to ascertain the impact of the leadership problems faced by school heads on their domain-based performance. According to the report, the leadership is moderately challenging when it comes to both internal and external issues. Conclusive of the findings, the school heads' external and internal leadership challenges have no significant influence on their performances based on seven (7) Domains of the Philippine Professional Standard for School Heads. The null hypothesis should be accepted as a result of this. Lastly, it is recommended that school leaders' ongoing professional development program create workable add-ons to help them integrate successful practices into their daily administrative performance. They need to fully comprehend the Philippine Professional Standards for School Heads (PPSSH), particularly the various strands that describe the specific aspects of school leadership practices and disseminate the management implications derived from the study as valuable insights for school heads to carry out their obligations and responsibilities effectively and efficiently as school leaders.
Article
Full-text available
This research study was designed to build grounded theory about the challenges faced by rural superintendents. Participating rural superintendents identified five areas that presented a challenge but that also applied to superintendents in other settings: school law, finance, personnel, government mandates, and district or board policies. Further, these superintendents identified challenges related specifically to the rural setting and to their lack of acculturation to the demands of rural school leadership. Focus group research conducted among rural superintendents in New York, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee indicated that the challenges of the rural superintendency were distinct enough to warrant some specialized preparation for such service.
Article
Full-text available
This article explores the responses of school principals of small rural schools in Victoria, Australia to leadership challenges they identify as characteristic of these contexts. The research is an exercise in grounded theory building, with the focus on the principalship as it is enacted in small rural settings. The article also seeks to trace the impact of macro and meso influences on micro rural contexts. While many very positive attributes of small rural schools are evident, this article speaks to principalship engagement with contextual problems - issues concerning work intensification, role multiplicity, school viability, new regulatory funding requirements and the abandonment of equity policies in education - since there is a dearth of information in Australia at this time about how school principals confront these challenges in small rural locations. The research exposes a growing culture of creative collaborative responses to the pervasive impediments of leading small rural schools.
Article
The aim of this study was to examine the pre-service training program of a teacher education institution in Fiji to determine whether it equipped beginning teachers for work in rural schools. Data for the study was gathered by means of interviews with key people in the case study institution and beginning teachers posted to a rural school. Also, analysis of documents such as, the College Handbook was carried out to gather information needed for the study. Analysis of the data showed that a course entitled DPE230, an enrichment activity known as Rural Homestay together with rural teaching practice were the innovations introduced to cater for the preparation of pre-service teachers for work in rural schools. The College staff felt the innovations introduced in the pre-service program had a positive impact in the preparation of teachers’ for work in rural schools. Likewise, the analysis of the feedback obtained from the beginning teachers clearly indicated that they were satisfied with their preparation as they adjusted themselves well to work and life in the rural school. The present study relating to pre-service training of teachers for teachers’ world of work is useful as it has implications also to higher education institutions within and outside Fiji to prepare teachers to meet the challenges of rural work and life.
Article
One-third of American children attend school in rural or small towns, but we overlook their needs and fund their schools poorly.
Article
School leaders in highly disadvantaged urban communities across the globe walk a tightrope, caught between the needs of communities and the requirements of national policies. This article aims to enrich our understanding of the potential of school–community relationships. It examines the policy discourse on urban schools and the practice of community leadership. The policy context is one of UK and international concerns about divisions in society and the rise of political extremism: concerns which, in the UK, have led to a policy focus on community cohesion. The article offers a conceptual framework—a theory of action—as a possible road map for school leaders to manage through this complex and evolving arena of policy and practice. The template—developed through earlier work on urban schools—is underpinned by a focus on trust (as the lubricant to link communities together) and social capital (as a way of harnessing the ‘social energy’ of communities for positive good). The template is tested against the leadership of two school principals in challenging contexts in London and Greater Manchester. The author concludes that there is potential for schools to create space for the voices of the marginalised and disenfranchised to be heard. This analysis will resonate with school leaders serving disadvantaged communities in many international contexts and signals a new departure for leadership.
Article
This study used both quantitative and qualitative methods of content analysis to examine principal evaluation instruments, and state and professional standards for principals in school districts located in a Mid-Atlantic state in the United States. The purposes of this study were to (a) determine the degrees of emphasis that are placed on leadership and management behaviors expected of school principals, (b) explore the congruence of principal evaluation instruments to instructional leadership and management attributes, and (c) explore the congruence of principal evaluation instruments with state and professional standards. Findings revealed school districts focused on instructional leadership, organizational management, and community relations as responsibilities for school principals. Principal evaluation instruments reflected common expectations for principals among school districts and state and professional standards.
Article
This paper proceeds from the basis that leadership can only be understood in context and by viewing it from the inside. In particular, it argues that the contextual complexity of small school leadership warrants attention from researchers, policy makers and system administrators and describes the nature of this complexity as depicted in the literature. It then reports a study being conducted in two states of Australia which examines the ways novice principals of small schools located in rural and remote areas make sense of, and deal with, the contextual complexity of their work. Finally, the paper discusses the implications of the study for promoting understanding of small school leadership and for developing authentic means of professional learning.
Article
Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning (McREL) has identified a research agenda that connects the challenges that rural schools face in implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) provisions. The rural education research agenda crafted by McREL includes nine priority topics: (1) Opportunity to learn; (2) School size and student achievement; (3) Teacher quality; (4) Administrator quality; (5) School and district capacity; (6) School finance; (7) Local control and alternative organizational structure; (8) School choice; and (9) Community and parent aspirations and expectations. These priority topics were developed with the help of McREL?s Rural Advisory Committee (RAC). As a first step, the practitioner and policymaker members of the RAC were asked to evaluate the practical utility of 113 research questions that were developed based on McREL?s review of rural education research. This document examines each topic and includes potential research questions.
Article
Historically, small schools have played a very important role in the provision of schooling in Australia. Numerically, using an enrollment of 200 or less, small schools represent approximately 45% of the schools in Australia. Population growth and the consequences of this, in particular for food production, water and energy, mean that the significance of small schools is likely to increase into the future, because many small schools are in rural areas where the "basics for life" are produced, managed or extracted. This in turn has implications for how small schools are valued and resourced by governments and policy-makers. Research undertaken in 2010 is used to identify potential major improvement in the preparation and support of leaders for small schools, given the importance of leadership to the effectiveness and impact of schooling.